Skip to content
“The Symbolic Acts of the True Shepherd”· Zechariah 11:7–14
Translation
King James Version
And I will feed the flock of slaughter, even you, O poor of the flock. And I took unto me two staves; the one I called Beauty, and the other I called Bands; and I fed the flock.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And I will feed H7462 the flock H6629 of slaughter H2028, even you H3651, O poor H6041 of the flock H6629. And I took H3947 unto me two H8147 staves H4731; the one H259 I called H7121 Beauty H5278, and the other H259 I called H7121 Bands H2254; and I fed H7462 the flock H6629.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
So I shepherded the flock for slaughter, truly the most miserable of the sheep; and I took two staffs for myself. I called the one No'am [pleasantness], the other I called Hovalim [bound together], and I shepherded the flock.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
So I pastured the flock marked for slaughter, especially the afflicted of the flock. Then I took for myself two staffs, calling one Favor and the other Union, and I pastured the flock.
Ask
American Standard Version
So I fed the flock of slaughter, verily the poor of the flock. And I took unto me two staves; the one I called Beauty, and the other I called Bands; and I fed the flock.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
So I fed the flock of slaughter, especially the oppressed of the flock. I took for myself two staffs. The one I called “Favor”, and the other I called “Union”, and I fed the flock.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
For I fed the sheepe of slaughter, euen the poore of the flocke, and I tooke vnto me two staues: the one I called Beautie, and the other I called Bandes, and I fed the sheepe.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And I feed the flock of slaughter, even you, ye afflicted of the flock; and I take to me two staves, the one I have called Pleasantness, and the other I have called Bands, and I feed the flock.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 23,036 of 31,102 · 74.1%

Study This Verse

Summary

Zechariah 11:7 initiates a profound prophetic allegory within the book, depicting the Lord (or a prophetic figure representing Him) assuming the role of a shepherd tending a flock destined for slaughter, specifically focusing on the "poor of the flock." The verse introduces two symbolic staves, "Beauty" (or "Graciousness") and "Bands" (or "Union"), which the shepherd takes to guide and protect the sheep. This act signifies God's renewed, albeit temporary, direct care for His people Israel, highlighting His covenantal favor and the intended unity of the nation, even as they face impending judgment due to corrupt leadership and their own rebellion.

Context

Literary Context

Zechariah 11 marks a dramatic shift from the earlier visions of restoration and temple rebuilding to a somber prophetic drama concerning Israel's leadership and destiny. The preceding verses (Zechariah 11:1-3) describe a devastating judgment upon the land, possibly hinting at the Roman destruction of Jerusalem. Immediately before this verse, Zechariah 11:4-6 introduces the divine command to "feed the flock of slaughter," setting the stage for the shepherd's actions described in verse 7. This shepherd is distinct from the corrupt "shepherds" (leaders) mentioned in Zechariah 11:5, who exploit their flock. The narrative arc of chapter 11 then proceeds to describe the shepherd's rejection, the breaking of the staves (Zechariah 11:10 and Zechariah 11:14), and the shepherd being sold for "thirty pieces of silver" (Zechariah 11:12-13).

Historical & Cultural Context

The book of Zechariah was written during the post-exilic period (c. 520-518 BC), as the Jewish exiles had returned to Judah from Babylon. The nation was struggling to rebuild Jerusalem and the Temple under Persian rule. At this time, the people were led by both civil (e.g., Zerubbabel) and religious (e.g., Joshua the high priest) authorities. However, the broader history of Israel was marked by a recurring pattern of corrupt or negligent leadership, particularly among kings and priests, who often failed to shepherd God's people faithfully. This context of failed human leadership and the people's vulnerability to exploitation (as seen in Ezekiel 34) provides the backdrop for Zechariah's shepherd allegory. The use of "staves" or "rods" was common for shepherds in the ancient Near East, serving as tools for guidance, protection, and counting the flock, making them potent symbols of authority and care.

Key Themes

Zechariah 11:7 contributes significantly to several overarching themes within the book and broader prophetic literature. It emphasizes the theme of Divine Shepherdship vs. Corrupt Leadership, contrasting God's compassionate care with the exploitative practices of human rulers. The imagery of the "flock of slaughter" highlights the Vulnerability and Judgment of Israel, a people suffering under poor leadership and facing divine judgment for their unfaithfulness. The specific mention of the "poor of the flock" underscores God's Concern for the Remnant and the Marginalized, those who are humble and discerning amidst the broader spiritual decline. Furthermore, the two staves, "Beauty" and "Bands," symbolize God's Covenantal Grace and National Unity, which are foundational to Israel's well-being. The subsequent breaking of these staves in Zechariah 11:10 and Zechariah 11:14 foreshadows the dissolution of God's covenantal favor and the fracturing of national unity due to Israel's rejection of the true Shepherd.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

slaughter hărêgâh' H2028

This feminine noun (H2028) denotes a state of being destined for killing or massacre. In the context of "the flock of slaughter," it powerfully conveys the dire predicament of the people of Israel, who are not merely oppressed but are, in effect, being led to their doom by their own corrupt leaders and their rejection of God's true shepherd. It emphasizes their vulnerability and the impending judgment.

Beauty nôʻam' H5278

This noun (H5278) signifies "pleasantness," "delight," "grace," or "favor." As the name of one of the staves, it represents God's gracious covenant with Israel, His divine favor, and the pleasantness and security that His direct rule and protection brought to His people. It embodies the blessings and well-being that flow from a right relationship with God, particularly through His covenant.

Bands châbal' H2254

Derived from a root meaning "to wind tightly" or "to bind" (H2254), this word, when used as a noun in this context, refers to "binders" or "union." As the name of the second staff, it symbolizes the unity, brotherhood, and cohesion among the tribes of Israel. It represents the intended solidarity and concord that God desired for His people, preventing internal strife and division, and fostering a united national identity under His divine guidance.

Verse Breakdown

"And I will feed the flock of slaughter, [even] you, O poor of the flock."

This clause introduces the shepherd (likely the Lord or a prophetic representative) taking charge of a flock already condemned or destined for destruction. The phrase "flock of slaughter" highlights their desperate state, facing exploitation and judgment. The specific address, "even you, O poor of the flock," emphasizes God's particular concern and care for the humble, afflicted, and spiritually discerning within Israel—those who are marginalized and recognize their need for a true shepherd, contrasting them with the complacent or rebellious majority.

"And I took unto me two staves; the one I called Beauty, and the other I called Bands;"

The shepherd's action of taking two distinct staves signifies the assumption of authority and a specific methodology for tending the flock. The naming of these staves is highly symbolic: "Beauty" (or "Graciousness") represents God's covenantal favor, the pleasantness of His guidance, and the blessings that flow from His relationship with Israel. "Bands" (or "Union") symbolizes the internal unity and brotherhood that God intended for His people, preventing division and fostering communal solidarity.

"and I fed the flock."

This concluding phrase reiterates the shepherd's immediate and active role in providing for and caring for the flock, despite their precarious state. It signifies the shepherd's commitment to fulfilling his pastoral duty, embodying divine provision and care, even for a flock that is largely rebellious and destined for judgment.

Literary Devices

Zechariah 11:7 is rich in Symbolism. The entire passage functions as an extended Allegory, where the "shepherd" represents God's divine care (or a prophetic figure acting on His behalf), and the "flock" symbolizes the nation of Israel. The "flock of slaughter" is a poignant symbol of Israel's vulnerability and their impending judgment due to their unfaithfulness and corrupt leadership. The "poor of the flock" symbolize the humble, discerning remnant within Israel. Most significantly, the two "staves," "Beauty" and "Bands," are potent symbols. "Beauty" (or "Graciousness") embodies God's covenantal favor, grace, and the pleasantness of His guidance, while "Bands" (or "Union") represents the unity and brotherhood among the tribes of Israel. The act of the shepherd taking these staves is a Metaphor for assuming divine authority and responsibility over the nation, intending to govern them with grace and maintain their unity. The narrative employs Dramatic Irony, as the shepherd's benevolent actions are ultimately met with rejection by the very flock he seeks to save, setting the stage for the tragic events that follow in the chapter.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Zechariah 11:7 profoundly illustrates God's persistent and compassionate engagement with His people, even when they are in a state of spiritual decline and facing judgment. It underscores the divine ideal of shepherd leadership—one characterized by grace ("Beauty") and unity ("Bands")—in stark contrast to the self-serving and destructive leadership that Israel often experienced. The verse highlights God's unwavering commitment to His covenant, even as He prepares to withdraw His direct care due to the people's rejection. It also reveals God's special heart for the humble and afflicted ("the poor of the flock"), demonstrating that His salvation is often directed towards those who recognize their need for Him, even within a broader context of national apostasy. The breaking of these staves later in the chapter signifies the breaking of God's covenant and the dissolution of national unity, a tragic consequence of rejecting divine grace and true leadership.

Reflection and Application

Zechariah 11:7 invites us to reflect deeply on the nature of divine care, human leadership, and our own responsiveness to God's guidance. It challenges us to examine whether we, as individuals and as the collective body of Christ, are truly "the poor of the flock"—those who humbly recognize our need for the Good Shepherd's provision and guidance, or if we are complacent, rebellious, or exploited by those who claim to lead but fail to truly care. The symbolism of "Beauty" and "Bands" reminds us of the twin pillars of God's grace and the vital importance of unity within the Christian community. When grace is undervalued or unity is fractured, the flock becomes vulnerable to spiritual "slaughter." This passage serves as a powerful call to discern true spiritual leadership, to embrace God's covenantal favor, and to actively pursue unity within the church, recognizing that our well-being and effectiveness depend on these foundational principles.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what ways might I be part of "the poor of the flock," recognizing my need for God's direct care and guidance?
  2. How does the concept of "Beauty" (God's gracious covenant) manifest in my daily walk with Christ, and am I living in its pleasantness?
  3. What practical steps can I take to foster "Bands" (unity and brotherhood) within my local church or community?
  4. How can I better discern true spiritual leadership from that which exploits or neglects the flock, both in historical and contemporary contexts?

FAQ

What is the significance of the "flock of slaughter" in Zechariah 11:7?

The "flock of slaughter" refers to the nation of Israel, depicted as sheep destined for destruction. This imagery highlights their vulnerable state due to corrupt leadership and their impending judgment. It signifies that they are a people being led to ruin, not by external enemies alone, but by their own internal failures and the exploitation of their "shepherds" (leaders), as detailed in Zechariah 11:4-6. The divine shepherd steps in to care for them, even in this dire condition, emphasizing God's compassion despite their fate.

What do the two staves, "Beauty" and "Bands," symbolize?

The two staves are powerful symbols of the divine shepherd's method of governing the flock. "Beauty" (Hebrew: No'am) symbolizes God's gracious covenant with Israel, His favor, and the pleasantness and security that His direct rule and protection brought. It represents the blessings and well-being derived from God's presence and guidance. "Bands" (Hebrew: Chabal) symbolizes the unity and brotherhood among the tribes of Israel, representing the intended cohesion and solidarity that God desired for His people. Their subsequent breaking in Zechariah 11:10 and Zechariah 11:14 signifies the dissolution of God's covenantal favor and the fracturing of national unity.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Zechariah 11:7 finds its ultimate and profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the person and ministry of Jesus Christ, the Good Shepherd. The prophet Zechariah, acting as the shepherd in this allegory, foreshadows Christ's incarnation and His compassionate care for His "flock of slaughter," the nation of Israel, who were "harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd" (Matthew 9:36). Jesus came specifically to "feed" or shepherd these "poor of the flock"—the humble, the marginalized, and those who recognized their spiritual destitution, declaring, "Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven" (Matthew 5:3). He took up the "staves" of "Beauty" and "Bands," embodying God's covenantal grace and seeking to unite His people. His entire ministry was a demonstration of divine "Beauty" or "pleasantness," bringing grace and truth (John 1:14). He also sought to gather the dispersed children of God into one unified body, fulfilling the symbolism of "Bands" (John 11:52). However, just as the shepherd in Zechariah was rejected and sold for "thirty pieces of silver" (Zechariah 11:12-13), so too was Jesus rejected by His own people and betrayed for the very same price (Matthew 26:15). His crucifixion and the subsequent destruction of Jerusalem and the dispersion of the Jewish people can be seen as the ultimate breaking of the staves, signifying the temporary cessation of God's direct covenantal favor with the nation in that form and the fracturing of their unity, paving the way for a new covenant and a new, unified flock composed of both Jews and Gentiles (Ephesians 2:14-16).

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Zechariah 11:4–14. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 11 verses
Passage under commentZechariah 11:4–14
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

The prophet here is made a type of Christ, as the prophet Isaiah sometimes was; and the scope of these verses is to show that for judgment Christ came into this world (Joh 9:39), for judgment to the Jewish church and nation, which were, about the time of his coming, wretchedly corrupted and degenerated by the worldliness and hypocrisy of their rulers. Christ would have healed them, but they would not be healed; they are therefore left desolate, and abandoned to ruin. Observe here,

I.The desperate case of the Jewish church, under the tyranny of their own governors.

Their slavery in their own country made them as miserable as their captivity in strange countries had done: Their possessors slay them and sell them, Zac 11:5. In Zechariah's time we find the rulers and the nobles justly rebuked for exacting usury of their brethren; and the governors, even by their servants, oppressive to the people, Neh 5:7, Neh 5:15. In Christ's time the chief priests and the elders, who were the possessors of the flock, by their traditions, the commandments of men, and their impositions on the consciences of the people, became perfect tyrants, devoured their houses, engrossed their wealth, and fleeced the flock instead of feeding it. The Sadducees, who were deists, corrupted their judgments. The Pharisees, who were bigots for superstition, corrupted their morals, by making void the commandments of God, Mat 15:16. Thus they slew the sheep of the flock, thus they sold them. They cared not what became of them so they could but gain their own ends and serve their own interests. And,

1.In this they justified themselves: They slay them and hold themselves not guilty. They think that there is no harm in it, and that they shall never be called to an account for it by the chief Shepherd; as if their power were given them for destruction, which was designed only for edification, and as if, because they sat in Moses's seat, they were not under the obligation of Moses's law, but might dispense with it, and with themselves in the breach of it, at their pleasure. Note, Those have their minds woefully blinded indeed who do ill and justify themselves in doing it; but God will not hold those guiltless who hold themselves so.

2.In this they affronted God, by giving him thanks for the gain of their oppression: They said, Blessed be the Lord, for I am rich, as if, because they prospered in their wickedness, got money by it, and raised estates, God had made himself patron of their unjust practices, and Providence had become particeps criminis - the associate of their guilt. What is got honestly we ought to give God thanks for, and to bless him whose blessing makes rich and adds no sorrow with it. But with what face can we go to God either to beg a blessing upon the unlawful methods of getting wealth or to return him thanks for success in them? They should rather have gone to God to confess the sin, to take shame to themselves for it, and to vow restitution, than thus to mock him by making the gains of sin the gift of God, who hates robbery for burnt-offerings, and reckons not himself praised by the thanksgiving if he be dishonoured either in the getting or the using of that which we give him thanks for.

3.In this they put contempt upon the people of God, as unworthy their regard or compassionate consideration: Their own shepherds pity them not; they make them miserable, and then do not commiserate them. Christ had compassion on the multitude because they fainted and were scattered abroad, as if they had no shepherd (as really they had worse than none); but their own shepherds pitied them not, nor showed any concern for them. Note, It is ill for a church when its pastors have no tenderness, no compassion for precious souls, when they can look upon the ignorant, the foolish, the wicked, the weak, without pity.

II.The sentence of God's wrath passed upon them for their senselessness and stupidity in this condition.

There was a general decay, nay, a destruction, of religion among them, and it was all one to them; they regarded it not. My people love to have it so, Jer 5:31. Though they were oppressed and broken in judgment, yet they willingly walked after the commandment, Hos 5:11. And, as their shepherds pitied them not, so they did not bemoan themselves; therefore God says (Zac 11:6), "I will no more pity the inhabitants of the land. They have courted their own destruction, and so let their doom be." But those are truly miserable whom the God of mercy himself will no more have compassion upon. Those who are willing to have their consciences oppressed by those who teach for doctrines the commandments of men (as the Jews were, who called those Rabbi, Rabbi, that did so, Mat 15:9; Mat 23:7), are often punished by oppression in their civil interests, and justly, for those forfeit their own rights who tamely give up God's rights. The Jews did so; the Papists do so; and who can pity them if they be ruled with rigour? God here threatens them,

1.That he will deliver them into the hand of oppressors, every one into his neighbour's hand, so that they shall use one another barbarously. The several parties in Jerusalem did so; the zealots, the seditious, as they were called, committed greater outrages than the common enemy did, as Josephus relates in his history of the wars of the Jews. They shall be delivered every one into the hand of his king, that is, the Roman emperor, whom they chose to submit to rather than to Christ, saying, We have no king but Caesar. Thus they thought to ingratiate themselves with their lords and masters. But for this God brought the Romans upon them, who took away their place and nation.

2.That he will not deliver them out of their hands: They shall smite the land, the whole land, and out of their hand I will not deliver them; and, if the Lord do not help them, none else can, nor can they help themselves.

III.A trial yet made whether their ruin might be prevented by sending Christ among them as a shepherd; God had sent his servants to them in vain, but last of all he sent unto them his Son, saying, They will reverence my Son, Mat 21:37. Divers of the prophets had spoken of him as the Shepherd of Israel, Isa 40:11; Eze 34:23. he himself told the Pharisees that he was the Shepherd of the sheep, and that those who pretended to be shepherds were thieves and robbers (Joh 10:1, Joh 10:2, Joh 10:11), apparently referring to this passage, where we have,

1.The charge he received from his Father to try what might be done with this flock (Zac 11:4): Thus saith the Lord my God (Christ called his Father his God because he acted in compliance with his will and with an eye to his glory in his whole undertaking), Feed the flock of the slaughter. The Jews were God's flock, but they were the flock of slaughter, for their enemies had killed them all the day long and accounted them as sheep for the slaughter; their own possessors slew them, and God himself had doomed them to the slaughter. Yet "feed them by reproof instruction, and comfort; provide wholesome food for those who have so long been soured with the leaven of the scribes and Pharisees." Other sheep he had, which were not of this fold, and which afterwards must be brought; but he is first sent to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, Mat 15:24.

2.His acceptance of this charge, and his undertaking pursuant to it, Zac 11:7. He does as it were say, Lo, I come to do thy will, O my God! and, since this is thy will, it is mine: I will feed the flock of slaughter. Christ will care for these lost sheep; he will go about among them, teaching and healing even you, O poor of the flock! Christ did not neglect the meanest, nor overlook them for their meanness. The shepherds that made a prey of them regarded not the poor; they were conversant with those only that they could get by; but Christ preached his gospel to the poor, Mat 11:5. It was an instance of his humiliation that his converse was mostly with the inferior sort of people; his disciples, who were his constant attendants, were of the poor of the flock.

3.His furnishing himself with tools proper for the charge he had undertaken: I took unto me two staves, pastoral staves; other shepherds have but one crook, but Christ had two, denoting the double care he took of his flock, and what he did both for the souls and for the bodies of men. David speaks of God's rod and his staff (Psa 23:4), a correcting rod and a supporting staff. One of these staves was called Beauty, denoting the temple, which is called the beauty of holiness and one of its gates beautiful, which Christ called his Father's house, and for which he showed a great zeal when he cleared it of the buyers and sellers; the other he called Bands, denoting their civil state, and the incorporate society of that nation, which Christ also took care of by preaching love and peace among them. Christ, in his gospel, and in all he did among them, consulted the advancement both of their civil and of their sacred interests.

4.His execution of his office, as the chief Shepherd. He fed the flock (Zac 11:7), and he displaced those under-shepherds that were false to their trust (Zac 11:8): Three shepherds I cut off in one month. Through the deficiency and uncertainty of the history of the Jewish church, in its latter ages, we know not what particular event this had its accomplishment in; in general, it seems to be an act of power and justice for the punishment of the sinful shepherds and the redress of the grievances of the abused flock. Some understand it of the three orders of princes, priests, and scribes or prophets, who, when Christ had finished his work, were laid aside for their unfaithfulness. Others understand it of the three sects among the Jews, of Pharisees, Sadducees, and Herodians, all whom Christ silenced in dispute (Mt. 22) and soon after cut off, all in a little time.

IV.Their enmity to Christ, and making themselves odious to him.

He came to his own, the sheep of his own pasture; it might have been expected that between them and him there would be an entire affection, as between the shepherd and his sheep; but they conducted themselves so ill that his soul loathed them, was straitened towards them (so it may be read); he intended them kindness, but could not do them the kindness he intended them, because of their unbelief, Mat 13:58. He was disappointed in them, discouraged concerning them, grieved for them, not only for the shepherds, whom he cut off, but for the people, whom Christ often looked upon with grief in his heart and tears in his eyes. Their provocations even wore out his patience, and he was weary of that faithless and perverse generation. Their soul also it abhorred me; and therefore it was that his soul loathed them; for, whatever estrangement there is between God and man, it begins on man's side. The Jewish shepherds rejected this chief Shepherd, as the Jewish builders rejected this chief corner stone. They had indignation at Christ's doctrine and miracles, and his interest in the people, to whom they did all they could to render him odious, as they had made themselves odious to him. Note, There is a mutual enmity between God and wicked people; they are hateful to God and haters of God. Nothing speaks more the sinfulness and misery of an unregenerate state than this does. The carnal mind, the friendship of the world, are enmity to God, and God hates all the workers of iniquity; and it is easy to foresee what this will end in, if the quarrel be not taken up in time, Isa 27:4, Isa 27:5.

V.Christ's rejecting them as incurable, and leaving them their house desolate, Mat 23:38.

The things of their peace are now hidden from their eyes, because they knew not the day of their visitation. Here we have,

1.The sentence of their rejection passed (Zac 11:9): "Then said I, I will not feed you. I will take no further care of you; you shall not see me again; take your own course. As I will not feed you, so I will not cure you; that that dieth, let it die (the Shepherd will do nothing to save its forfeited life); that that is to be cut off, let it be cut off; that which will make itself a prey to the wolf, let it be a prey, and let the rest so far forget their own mild and gentle nature as to eat the flesh of one another; let these sheep fight like dogs." Those that reject Christ will be certainly and justly rejected by him, and then are miserable of course.

2.A sign of it given (Zac 11:10): I took my staff, even Beauty, and cut it asunder, in token of this, that he would be no longer a shepherd to them, as the lord high steward determines his commission by breaking his white staff, and as Moses's breaking the tables of the law put a stop, for the present, to the treaty between God and Israel. The breaking of this staff signified the breaking of God's covenant which he had made with all the people, the covenant of peculiarity made with all the tribes of Israel, and all other people who, by being proselyted to their religion, were incorporated into their nation. The Jewish church was now stripped of all its glory; its crown was profaned and cast to the ground, and all its honour laid in the dust; for God departed from it, and would no more own it for his. When Christ told them plainly that the kingdom of God should be taken from them, and given to another people, then be broke the staff of Beauty, Mat 21:43. And it was broken in that day, though Jerusalem and the Jewish nation held up forty years longer, yet from that day we may reckon the staff of Beauty broken, Zac 11:11. And though the great men did not, or would not, understand it as a divine sentence, but thought to put it by with a cold God forbid (Luk 20:16), yet the poor of the flock, the disciples of Christ, that waited on him, and understood with what authority he spoke, and could distinguish the voice of their Shepherd from that of a stranger, knew that it was the word of the Lord, and trembled at it, and were confident that it should not fall to the ground. Note, Christ is waited on by the poor of the flock; he chose them to be with him, to be his pupils, to be his witnesses; the poor received him and his gospel, when those that had great possessions turned their backs upon him. And those that wait upon Christ, that sit at his feet, to hear and receive his words, shall know of the doctrine whether it be of God, Joh 7:17.

3.A further reason given for their rejection. It was said before, Their souls abhorred him; and here we have an instance of it, their buying and selling him for thirty pieces of silver, either thirty Roman pence, or rather thirty Jewish shekels; this is here foretold in somewhat obscure expressions, as it is fit that such particular prophecies should be delivered, lest otherwise the plainness of the prophecy might prevent the accomplishment of it. Here,

(1.)The Shepherd comes to them for his wages (Zac 11:12): "If you think good, give me my price; you are weary of me, pay me off and discharge me; and, if not, forbear; if you be willing to continue me longer in your service, I will continue, or, if to turn me off without wages, I am content." Christ was no hireling, and yet the labourer is worthy of his hire. Compare with this what Christ said to Judas when he was going to sell him, "What thou doest do quickly; be at a word with the chief priests; let them either take the bargain or leave it," Joh 13:27. Those that betray Christ are not forced to it; they might have chosen.

(2.)They value him at thirty pieces of silver. Many years' service he had done them as a Shepherd, yet this is all they will now turn him off with - "A goodly price that I with all my care and pains was valued at by them." If Judas fixed this sum in his demand, it is observable that his name was Judah, the same name with that of the body of the people, for it was a national act; or, if (as it rather seems) the chief priests pitched upon this sum in their proffers, they were the representatives of the people; it was part of the priest's office to put a value upon the devoted things (Lev 27:8), and thus they valued the Lord Jesus. it was the ordinary price of a slave, Exo 21:32. Making light of Christ, and undervaluing the love of that great and good Shepherd, are the ruin of multitudes, and justly so.

(3.)The silver being no way proportionable to his worth, it is thrown to the potter with disdain: "Let him take it to buy clay with, or for any use that a little money will serve to, for it is not worth hoarding; it may be enough for a potter's stock, but not for the pay of such a shepherd, much less for his purchase." So the prophet cast the thirty pieces of silver to the potter in the house of the Lord: "Let him take them, and do what he will with them." Now we find a particular accomplishment of this in the history of Christ's sufferings, and reference is had to this prophecy, Mat 27:9, Mat 27:10. Thirty pieces of silver was the very sum for which Christ was sold to the chief priests; the money, when Judas would not keep it, and the chief priests would not take it back was laid out in the purchase of the potter's field. Even that sudden resolve of the chief priests was according to an ancient prophecy and the more ancient counsel and foreknowledge of God.

4.The completing of their rejection in the cutting asunder of the other staff, Zac 11:14. The former denoted the ruin of their church, by breaking the covenant between God and them - that defaced their beauty; this denotes the ruin of their state, by breaking the brotherhood between Judah and Israel, by reviving animosities and contention among them, such as were of old between Judah and Israel, the writing of whom as one stick in the hand of the Lord was one of the blessings promised after their return out of captivity, Eze 37:19. But that union shall now be dissolved; they shall be crumbled into parties and factions, exasperated one against another; and their kingdom, being thus divided, shall be brought to desolation.

(1.)Nothing ruins a people so certainly, so inevitably, as the breaking of the staff of Bands, and the weakening of the brotherhood among them; for hereby they become an easy prey to the common enemy.

(2.)This follows upon the dissolving of the covenant between God and them, and the decay of religion among them. When iniquity abounds love waxes cold. No wonder if those fall out among themselves that have provoked God to fall out with them. When the staff of Beauty is broken the staff of Bands will not hold long. An unchurched people will soon be an undone people.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Fourteen Centuries of Reception

2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

2 quotes · AD 420–1781
Post-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
400500600700800900100011001200130014001500160017001800

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

AD 420JeromePost-NiceneSourceCommentary on Zechariah
(Verse 6, 7) And I will no longer spare those who dwell on the earth, says the Lord. Behold, I will deliver each man into the hand of his neighbor and into the hand of his king, and they shall strike the earth, and I will not deliver it from their hand. And I will feed the sheep of slaughter, O you poor of the flock. LXX: Therefore, I will no longer spare the inhabitants of the earth, says the Lord. And behold, I will deliver each man into the hands of his neighbor and into the hand of his king, and they shall strike the earth, and I will not deliver it from their hand, and I will feed the sheep of slaughter in Canaan. What the Seventy translated in the last chapter: 'And I will feed the sheep of slaughter in the land of Canaan', is not in Hebrew, and is not translated by any other interpreter. Therefore, since their shepherds did not spare them, but themselves devoured my first people, for this reason, I will no longer spare the inhabitants of the land of Judea, says the Lord. For he speaks of this land, of which the discourse was to him, and not of the world, as the Jews, interpreting poorly, want to distort the meaning of God into another part. For after the destruction of the temple (which happened to them because for forty-two years, from the time the Lord suffered, having received opportunity, they refused to repent), he says, 'I will send one against the other, and they will cut each other to pieces with mutual slaughter, whether in the very siege of the temple, when the Roman army will surround Jerusalem, for there will be such wars and dissensions among the Jews that the people will be divided into three parts.' We read the seven books of the Jewish captivity, and we see that this prophecy has been fulfilled, confirmed by historical truth. 'And they will fall,' he says, 'the land, undoubtedly the Romans will destroy all the land and cities of the Jews. And I will not rescue them from their hand.' Listen, O Jews, who hold vain hopes for yourselves, and do not listen to the Lord who says and affirms: 'I will not rescue them from their hands,' that your future captivity among the Romans will be eternal. And I will feed the flock of slaughter, so that the Jews may always be nourished unto death; because this is God's decree: O you who are poor of the flock, that is, the righteous of Israel, who have believed in the Lord Jesus and have received the Son of God, listen to what is being said and learn the sacraments of the following chapter. And as we read in the Septuagint: And I will feed the sheep of slaughter in the land of Canaan, we can understand that the Lord will feed and nourish the Jewish people, who are destined for death and scattered throughout the whole world (that is, in the land of Canaan and among the Gentiles), for the purpose of sacrifice.
AD 1781Richard ChallonerMedieval
Two rods: Or shepherd's staves, meaning the different ways of God's dealing with his people; the one, by sweet means, called the rod of Beauty: the other, by bands and punishments, called the Cord. And where both these rods are made of no use or effect by the obstinacy of sinners, the rods are broken, and such sinners are given up to a reprobate sense, as the Jews were.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Zechariah 11:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.