Skip to content
“The Symbolic Acts of the True Shepherd”· Zechariah 11:7–14
Translation
King James Version
Then I cut asunder mine other staff, even Bands, that I might break the brotherhood between Judah and Israel.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Then I cut asunder H1438 mine other H8145 staff H4731, even Bands H2254, that I might break H6565 the brotherhood H264 between Judah H3063 and Israel H3478.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Then I snapped in two my other staff Hovalim [bound together], in order to break up the brotherhood between Y'hudah and Isra'el.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Then I cut in two my second staff called Union, breaking the brotherhood between Judah and Israel.
Ask
American Standard Version
Then I cut asunder mine other staff, even Bands, that I might break the brotherhood between Judah and Israel.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Then I cut apart my other staff, even Union, that I might break the brotherhood between Judah and Israel.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then brake I mine other staffe, euen the Bandes, that I might dissolue the brotherhood betweene Iudah and Israel.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And I cut asunder my second staff, Bands, to break the unity between Judah and Israel.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 23,043 of 31,102 · 74.1%

Study This Verse

Summary

Zechariah 11:14 is a profound prophetic declaration within an allegorical passage, depicting the Lord's decisive act of breaking the staff named "Bands." This action symbolizes the dissolution of the internal unity and spiritual brotherhood between the historically divided kingdoms of Judah and Israel, signifying a divine judgment upon a people who had rejected their true Shepherd. The verse underscores the severe consequences of national and spiritual disunity, leading to a fracturing of the covenant community.

Context

Literary Context

Zechariah 11 presents a complex allegorical prophecy where the prophet assumes the role of a shepherd tending a flock destined for slaughter. The shepherd carries two symbolic staffs: "Beauty" (or "Graciousness") and "Bands" (or "Union"). In Zechariah 11:10, the staff "Beauty" was broken, symbolizing the breaking of God's covenant of grace and protection with His people. Verse 14 describes the breaking of the second staff, "Bands," which represents the internal cohesion and brotherhood of the nation. This act completes the shepherd's symbolic actions of judgment, setting the stage for the rise of a "worthless shepherd" in the subsequent verses, further emphasizing the consequences of rejecting the true divine leadership.

Historical & Cultural Context

While Zechariah prophesied in the post-exilic period, the imagery in this chapter draws heavily on the historical division of the united monarchy into the Northern Kingdom (Israel) or Ephraim, and the Southern Kingdom (Judah), which occurred after the reign of Solomon, as detailed in 1 Kings 12. This historical schism serves as a powerful backdrop for the prophecy of a deeper, spiritual fracturing. The concept of "brotherhood" was paramount for a covenant people, emphasizing their shared heritage, faith, and divine election. The breaking of this bond would have been understood as a catastrophic internal collapse, undermining the very identity and strength of God's chosen nation. The prophecy looks beyond the initial political split to a more profound and enduring spiritual disunity.

Key Themes

This verse significantly contributes to several overarching themes within Zechariah and broader biblical theology. It highlights Divine Judgment, as the breaking of the staffs represents God's active withdrawal of His protective hand and the imposition of judgment due to the people's persistent disobedience and rejection of His guidance. The central theme is Broken Unity, specifically the profound and lasting division among God's people, leading to internal conflict and weakness rather than spiritual strength and cohesion. This disunity is a direct Consequence of Rejection of the true Shepherd; when the nation rejects God's gracious covenant and leadership, as foreshadowed in Zechariah 11:10, the natural outcome is internal strife and vulnerability, ultimately leading to their desolation, a theme echoed in Jesus' lament over Jerusalem in Matthew 23:37-38.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

cut asunder gâdaʻ' H1438

This primitive root signifies a forceful and decisive act of destruction. It means "to fell a tree; generally, to destroy anything; cut (asunder, in sunder, down, off), hew down." In this context, it emphasizes the Lord's deliberate and complete severance of the bonds that held Judah and Israel together, indicating a divine judgment that is both intentional and irreversible.

Bands châbal H2254

While the root châbal means "to wind tightly (as a rope), i.e. to bind," the noun form (here, chabalim) refers to cords, ropes, or bands. Its use here powerfully symbolizes the ties, connections, and unity that bound the tribes of Israel together. The breaking of "Bands" therefore means the destruction of these unifying ties, leading to disarray and fragmentation.

brotherhood ʼachăvâh H264

Derived from the word for "brother" (אָח), this term explicitly denotes "fraternity" or "brotherhood." Its presence in the verse clarifies the precise nature of the unity being shattered: the familial, national, and spiritual solidarity that was meant to characterize God's people, Judah and Israel, as members of one covenant family.

Verse Breakdown

"Then I cut asunder mine other staff"

The "I" refers to the Lord, or the prophet acting as the Lord's representative, highlighting divine agency in this destructive act. The "other staff" is explicitly identified as "Bands," distinguishing it from the previously broken staff, "Beauty." The phrase "cut asunder" denotes a violent, decisive, and complete severance, emphasizing the finality of the action.

"even Bands"

This phrase identifies the specific staff being broken. "Bands" symbolizes the internal unity, cohesion, and covenant bonds that were meant to hold the nation of Israel together, representing their shared identity and purpose as God's chosen people.

"that I might break the brotherhood between Judah and Israel"

This clause reveals the explicit purpose and devastating consequence of breaking the staff "Bands." It signifies the dissolution of the familial, national, and spiritual unity between the two primary divisions of God's people. This breaking of brotherhood implies a state of internal strife, disunity, and a complete fracturing of the covenant community, leaving them vulnerable and without their former solidarity.

Literary Devices

Zechariah 11:14 makes effective use of several literary devices to convey its powerful message. Symbolism is central, with the staff named "Bands" serving as a potent symbol for the internal unity and fraternal bonds within the nation of Israel. Its breaking symbolizes the destruction of that unity. The entire chapter functions as an Allegory, where the prophet's actions as a shepherd, along with the two staffs and the flock, represent God's dealings with His people, their rejection of Him, and the subsequent divine judgment. Furthermore, Anthropomorphism is present as God is depicted performing a human action ("I cut asunder"), making the divine judgment tangible and comprehensible to the audience. The direct statement of purpose, "that I might break the brotherhood," functions as a clear Statement of Intent, leaving no ambiguity about the divine will behind the symbolic act.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Zechariah 11:14 profoundly illustrates the theological principle that divine judgment often manifests as the withdrawal of God's unifying presence and the allowing of internal division. When a people reject God's gracious covenant and the leadership of His true shepherd, the natural consequence is the fracturing of their communal bonds and spiritual solidarity. This verse underscores the sacred importance of unity within God's people, revealing that its absence is not merely a social problem but a spiritual one with severe divine implications. The breaking of "Bands" signifies God's allowing His people to experience the full weight of their own choices, leading to self-inflicted disarray and vulnerability.

Reflection and Application

Zechariah 11:14 serves as a sobering reminder for believers today about the critical importance of unity within the body of Christ. Just as the ancient nation of Israel suffered fragmentation due to their rejection of God's ways, so too can the church be weakened and its witness compromised by internal strife, theological disagreements, personal agendas, and a lack of genuine love and reconciliation. This verse calls us to examine our own hearts and communities, urging us to actively pursue and preserve the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace (Ephesians 4:3). True spiritual unity is not merely an ideal but a divine imperative, essential for the church to effectively fulfill its mission, reflect God's character to the world, and stand strong against external pressures. We are called to be peacemakers, bridge-builders, and cultivators of brotherly love, ensuring that the "bands" of fellowship are strengthened, not broken.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How does disunity within a community of faith hinder its mission and witness to the world?
  2. What practical steps can individuals take to foster unity and reconciliation in their local church or broader Christian community?
  3. In what ways might our own actions, attitudes, or theological stances inadvertently contribute to the "breaking of bands" among believers today?

FAQ

What is the significance of the two staffs in Zechariah 11?

The two staffs, "Beauty" (or "Graciousness") and "Bands" (or "Union"), are central to the allegory in Zechariah 11. "Beauty" represents God's gracious covenant and protective favor over His people, which is broken in Zechariah 11:10, signifying the end of His direct, benevolent rule. "Bands" symbolizes the internal unity and brotherhood among the tribes of Israel, broken in Zechariah 11:14. Their breaking signifies God's withdrawal of favor and the consequent internal dissolution of the nation due to their rejection of His shepherd, leading to chaos and desolation.

Did the "brotherhood between Judah and Israel" ever truly break?

Yes, the historical division of the united monarchy into the Northern Kingdom (Israel) and Southern Kingdom (Judah) after Solomon's reign (1 Kings 12) was a significant initial fracturing. However, Zechariah's prophecy points to a deeper, ongoing, and ultimate spiritual disunity that characterized the Jewish people, especially leading up to and during the time of Christ. This disunity, marked by internal strife and factionalism, culminated in the rejection of their Messiah and the subsequent destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD, demonstrating a profound and lasting breakdown of their national and spiritual solidarity.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Zechariah 11:14 finds its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment in the rejection of Jesus, the true Good Shepherd, by His own people, and the subsequent consequences. The prophetic act of breaking the staff "Bands" foreshadows the profound internal division and spiritual fracturing that would characterize Israel after they refused to acknowledge and follow their Messiah. Jesus lamented over Jerusalem's unwillingness to be gathered under His protective care, a rejection that led to their desolation (Matthew 23:37-38). However, Christ's mission was not only to confront this disunity but also to ultimately restore true unity. He is the one who breaks down the "dividing wall of hostility" (Ephesians 2:14) between Jew and Gentile, creating "one new humanity" (Ephesians 2:15) in Himself. Through His sacrifice, Jesus gathers His scattered sheep, forming a new spiritual brotherhood—the Church—where all believers are united in Him, regardless of their former divisions (John 10:16). Thus, while the "bands" of national Israel were broken due to their rejection, Christ establishes an unbreakable spiritual unity in His body, founded on His love and the Holy Spirit (Ephesians 4:3-6).

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Zechariah 11:4–14. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 11 verses
Passage under commentZechariah 11:4–14
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

The prophet here is made a type of Christ, as the prophet Isaiah sometimes was; and the scope of these verses is to show that for judgment Christ came into this world (Joh 9:39), for judgment to the Jewish church and nation, which were, about the time of his coming, wretchedly corrupted and degenerated by the worldliness and hypocrisy of their rulers. Christ would have healed them, but they would not be healed; they are therefore left desolate, and abandoned to ruin. Observe here,

I.The desperate case of the Jewish church, under the tyranny of their own governors.

Their slavery in their own country made them as miserable as their captivity in strange countries had done: Their possessors slay them and sell them, Zac 11:5. In Zechariah's time we find the rulers and the nobles justly rebuked for exacting usury of their brethren; and the governors, even by their servants, oppressive to the people, Neh 5:7, Neh 5:15. In Christ's time the chief priests and the elders, who were the possessors of the flock, by their traditions, the commandments of men, and their impositions on the consciences of the people, became perfect tyrants, devoured their houses, engrossed their wealth, and fleeced the flock instead of feeding it. The Sadducees, who were deists, corrupted their judgments. The Pharisees, who were bigots for superstition, corrupted their morals, by making void the commandments of God, Mat 15:16. Thus they slew the sheep of the flock, thus they sold them. They cared not what became of them so they could but gain their own ends and serve their own interests. And,

1.In this they justified themselves: They slay them and hold themselves not guilty. They think that there is no harm in it, and that they shall never be called to an account for it by the chief Shepherd; as if their power were given them for destruction, which was designed only for edification, and as if, because they sat in Moses's seat, they were not under the obligation of Moses's law, but might dispense with it, and with themselves in the breach of it, at their pleasure. Note, Those have their minds woefully blinded indeed who do ill and justify themselves in doing it; but God will not hold those guiltless who hold themselves so.

2.In this they affronted God, by giving him thanks for the gain of their oppression: They said, Blessed be the Lord, for I am rich, as if, because they prospered in their wickedness, got money by it, and raised estates, God had made himself patron of their unjust practices, and Providence had become particeps criminis - the associate of their guilt. What is got honestly we ought to give God thanks for, and to bless him whose blessing makes rich and adds no sorrow with it. But with what face can we go to God either to beg a blessing upon the unlawful methods of getting wealth or to return him thanks for success in them? They should rather have gone to God to confess the sin, to take shame to themselves for it, and to vow restitution, than thus to mock him by making the gains of sin the gift of God, who hates robbery for burnt-offerings, and reckons not himself praised by the thanksgiving if he be dishonoured either in the getting or the using of that which we give him thanks for.

3.In this they put contempt upon the people of God, as unworthy their regard or compassionate consideration: Their own shepherds pity them not; they make them miserable, and then do not commiserate them. Christ had compassion on the multitude because they fainted and were scattered abroad, as if they had no shepherd (as really they had worse than none); but their own shepherds pitied them not, nor showed any concern for them. Note, It is ill for a church when its pastors have no tenderness, no compassion for precious souls, when they can look upon the ignorant, the foolish, the wicked, the weak, without pity.

II.The sentence of God's wrath passed upon them for their senselessness and stupidity in this condition.

There was a general decay, nay, a destruction, of religion among them, and it was all one to them; they regarded it not. My people love to have it so, Jer 5:31. Though they were oppressed and broken in judgment, yet they willingly walked after the commandment, Hos 5:11. And, as their shepherds pitied them not, so they did not bemoan themselves; therefore God says (Zac 11:6), "I will no more pity the inhabitants of the land. They have courted their own destruction, and so let their doom be." But those are truly miserable whom the God of mercy himself will no more have compassion upon. Those who are willing to have their consciences oppressed by those who teach for doctrines the commandments of men (as the Jews were, who called those Rabbi, Rabbi, that did so, Mat 15:9; Mat 23:7), are often punished by oppression in their civil interests, and justly, for those forfeit their own rights who tamely give up God's rights. The Jews did so; the Papists do so; and who can pity them if they be ruled with rigour? God here threatens them,

1.That he will deliver them into the hand of oppressors, every one into his neighbour's hand, so that they shall use one another barbarously. The several parties in Jerusalem did so; the zealots, the seditious, as they were called, committed greater outrages than the common enemy did, as Josephus relates in his history of the wars of the Jews. They shall be delivered every one into the hand of his king, that is, the Roman emperor, whom they chose to submit to rather than to Christ, saying, We have no king but Caesar. Thus they thought to ingratiate themselves with their lords and masters. But for this God brought the Romans upon them, who took away their place and nation.

2.That he will not deliver them out of their hands: They shall smite the land, the whole land, and out of their hand I will not deliver them; and, if the Lord do not help them, none else can, nor can they help themselves.

III.A trial yet made whether their ruin might be prevented by sending Christ among them as a shepherd; God had sent his servants to them in vain, but last of all he sent unto them his Son, saying, They will reverence my Son, Mat 21:37. Divers of the prophets had spoken of him as the Shepherd of Israel, Isa 40:11; Eze 34:23. he himself told the Pharisees that he was the Shepherd of the sheep, and that those who pretended to be shepherds were thieves and robbers (Joh 10:1, Joh 10:2, Joh 10:11), apparently referring to this passage, where we have,

1.The charge he received from his Father to try what might be done with this flock (Zac 11:4): Thus saith the Lord my God (Christ called his Father his God because he acted in compliance with his will and with an eye to his glory in his whole undertaking), Feed the flock of the slaughter. The Jews were God's flock, but they were the flock of slaughter, for their enemies had killed them all the day long and accounted them as sheep for the slaughter; their own possessors slew them, and God himself had doomed them to the slaughter. Yet "feed them by reproof instruction, and comfort; provide wholesome food for those who have so long been soured with the leaven of the scribes and Pharisees." Other sheep he had, which were not of this fold, and which afterwards must be brought; but he is first sent to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, Mat 15:24.

2.His acceptance of this charge, and his undertaking pursuant to it, Zac 11:7. He does as it were say, Lo, I come to do thy will, O my God! and, since this is thy will, it is mine: I will feed the flock of slaughter. Christ will care for these lost sheep; he will go about among them, teaching and healing even you, O poor of the flock! Christ did not neglect the meanest, nor overlook them for their meanness. The shepherds that made a prey of them regarded not the poor; they were conversant with those only that they could get by; but Christ preached his gospel to the poor, Mat 11:5. It was an instance of his humiliation that his converse was mostly with the inferior sort of people; his disciples, who were his constant attendants, were of the poor of the flock.

3.His furnishing himself with tools proper for the charge he had undertaken: I took unto me two staves, pastoral staves; other shepherds have but one crook, but Christ had two, denoting the double care he took of his flock, and what he did both for the souls and for the bodies of men. David speaks of God's rod and his staff (Psa 23:4), a correcting rod and a supporting staff. One of these staves was called Beauty, denoting the temple, which is called the beauty of holiness and one of its gates beautiful, which Christ called his Father's house, and for which he showed a great zeal when he cleared it of the buyers and sellers; the other he called Bands, denoting their civil state, and the incorporate society of that nation, which Christ also took care of by preaching love and peace among them. Christ, in his gospel, and in all he did among them, consulted the advancement both of their civil and of their sacred interests.

4.His execution of his office, as the chief Shepherd. He fed the flock (Zac 11:7), and he displaced those under-shepherds that were false to their trust (Zac 11:8): Three shepherds I cut off in one month. Through the deficiency and uncertainty of the history of the Jewish church, in its latter ages, we know not what particular event this had its accomplishment in; in general, it seems to be an act of power and justice for the punishment of the sinful shepherds and the redress of the grievances of the abused flock. Some understand it of the three orders of princes, priests, and scribes or prophets, who, when Christ had finished his work, were laid aside for their unfaithfulness. Others understand it of the three sects among the Jews, of Pharisees, Sadducees, and Herodians, all whom Christ silenced in dispute (Mt. 22) and soon after cut off, all in a little time.

IV.Their enmity to Christ, and making themselves odious to him.

He came to his own, the sheep of his own pasture; it might have been expected that between them and him there would be an entire affection, as between the shepherd and his sheep; but they conducted themselves so ill that his soul loathed them, was straitened towards them (so it may be read); he intended them kindness, but could not do them the kindness he intended them, because of their unbelief, Mat 13:58. He was disappointed in them, discouraged concerning them, grieved for them, not only for the shepherds, whom he cut off, but for the people, whom Christ often looked upon with grief in his heart and tears in his eyes. Their provocations even wore out his patience, and he was weary of that faithless and perverse generation. Their soul also it abhorred me; and therefore it was that his soul loathed them; for, whatever estrangement there is between God and man, it begins on man's side. The Jewish shepherds rejected this chief Shepherd, as the Jewish builders rejected this chief corner stone. They had indignation at Christ's doctrine and miracles, and his interest in the people, to whom they did all they could to render him odious, as they had made themselves odious to him. Note, There is a mutual enmity between God and wicked people; they are hateful to God and haters of God. Nothing speaks more the sinfulness and misery of an unregenerate state than this does. The carnal mind, the friendship of the world, are enmity to God, and God hates all the workers of iniquity; and it is easy to foresee what this will end in, if the quarrel be not taken up in time, Isa 27:4, Isa 27:5.

V.Christ's rejecting them as incurable, and leaving them their house desolate, Mat 23:38.

The things of their peace are now hidden from their eyes, because they knew not the day of their visitation. Here we have,

1.The sentence of their rejection passed (Zac 11:9): "Then said I, I will not feed you. I will take no further care of you; you shall not see me again; take your own course. As I will not feed you, so I will not cure you; that that dieth, let it die (the Shepherd will do nothing to save its forfeited life); that that is to be cut off, let it be cut off; that which will make itself a prey to the wolf, let it be a prey, and let the rest so far forget their own mild and gentle nature as to eat the flesh of one another; let these sheep fight like dogs." Those that reject Christ will be certainly and justly rejected by him, and then are miserable of course.

2.A sign of it given (Zac 11:10): I took my staff, even Beauty, and cut it asunder, in token of this, that he would be no longer a shepherd to them, as the lord high steward determines his commission by breaking his white staff, and as Moses's breaking the tables of the law put a stop, for the present, to the treaty between God and Israel. The breaking of this staff signified the breaking of God's covenant which he had made with all the people, the covenant of peculiarity made with all the tribes of Israel, and all other people who, by being proselyted to their religion, were incorporated into their nation. The Jewish church was now stripped of all its glory; its crown was profaned and cast to the ground, and all its honour laid in the dust; for God departed from it, and would no more own it for his. When Christ told them plainly that the kingdom of God should be taken from them, and given to another people, then be broke the staff of Beauty, Mat 21:43. And it was broken in that day, though Jerusalem and the Jewish nation held up forty years longer, yet from that day we may reckon the staff of Beauty broken, Zac 11:11. And though the great men did not, or would not, understand it as a divine sentence, but thought to put it by with a cold God forbid (Luk 20:16), yet the poor of the flock, the disciples of Christ, that waited on him, and understood with what authority he spoke, and could distinguish the voice of their Shepherd from that of a stranger, knew that it was the word of the Lord, and trembled at it, and were confident that it should not fall to the ground. Note, Christ is waited on by the poor of the flock; he chose them to be with him, to be his pupils, to be his witnesses; the poor received him and his gospel, when those that had great possessions turned their backs upon him. And those that wait upon Christ, that sit at his feet, to hear and receive his words, shall know of the doctrine whether it be of God, Joh 7:17.

3.A further reason given for their rejection. It was said before, Their souls abhorred him; and here we have an instance of it, their buying and selling him for thirty pieces of silver, either thirty Roman pence, or rather thirty Jewish shekels; this is here foretold in somewhat obscure expressions, as it is fit that such particular prophecies should be delivered, lest otherwise the plainness of the prophecy might prevent the accomplishment of it. Here,

(1.)The Shepherd comes to them for his wages (Zac 11:12): "If you think good, give me my price; you are weary of me, pay me off and discharge me; and, if not, forbear; if you be willing to continue me longer in your service, I will continue, or, if to turn me off without wages, I am content." Christ was no hireling, and yet the labourer is worthy of his hire. Compare with this what Christ said to Judas when he was going to sell him, "What thou doest do quickly; be at a word with the chief priests; let them either take the bargain or leave it," Joh 13:27. Those that betray Christ are not forced to it; they might have chosen.

(2.)They value him at thirty pieces of silver. Many years' service he had done them as a Shepherd, yet this is all they will now turn him off with - "A goodly price that I with all my care and pains was valued at by them." If Judas fixed this sum in his demand, it is observable that his name was Judah, the same name with that of the body of the people, for it was a national act; or, if (as it rather seems) the chief priests pitched upon this sum in their proffers, they were the representatives of the people; it was part of the priest's office to put a value upon the devoted things (Lev 27:8), and thus they valued the Lord Jesus. it was the ordinary price of a slave, Exo 21:32. Making light of Christ, and undervaluing the love of that great and good Shepherd, are the ruin of multitudes, and justly so.

(3.)The silver being no way proportionable to his worth, it is thrown to the potter with disdain: "Let him take it to buy clay with, or for any use that a little money will serve to, for it is not worth hoarding; it may be enough for a potter's stock, but not for the pay of such a shepherd, much less for his purchase." So the prophet cast the thirty pieces of silver to the potter in the house of the Lord: "Let him take them, and do what he will with them." Now we find a particular accomplishment of this in the history of Christ's sufferings, and reference is had to this prophecy, Mat 27:9, Mat 27:10. Thirty pieces of silver was the very sum for which Christ was sold to the chief priests; the money, when Judas would not keep it, and the chief priests would not take it back was laid out in the purchase of the potter's field. Even that sudden resolve of the chief priests was according to an ancient prophecy and the more ancient counsel and foreknowledge of God.

4.The completing of their rejection in the cutting asunder of the other staff, Zac 11:14. The former denoted the ruin of their church, by breaking the covenant between God and them - that defaced their beauty; this denotes the ruin of their state, by breaking the brotherhood between Judah and Israel, by reviving animosities and contention among them, such as were of old between Judah and Israel, the writing of whom as one stick in the hand of the Lord was one of the blessings promised after their return out of captivity, Eze 37:19. But that union shall now be dissolved; they shall be crumbled into parties and factions, exasperated one against another; and their kingdom, being thus divided, shall be brought to desolation.

(1.)Nothing ruins a people so certainly, so inevitably, as the breaking of the staff of Bands, and the weakening of the brotherhood among them; for hereby they become an easy prey to the common enemy.

(2.)This follows upon the dissolving of the covenant between God and them, and the decay of religion among them. When iniquity abounds love waxes cold. No wonder if those fall out among themselves that have provoked God to fall out with them. When the staff of Beauty is broken the staff of Bands will not hold long. An unchurched people will soon be an undone people.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Historical Reception

One surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.

1 quote · AD 420
AD 420JeromePost-NiceneSourceCommentary on Zechariah
(Verse 14) And I cut off my second staff, called 'Favor,' in order to break the brotherhood between Judah and Israel. Septuagint: And I threw away my second staff, called 'Favor,' in order to annul the covenant that existed between Judah and Israel. And in this place, I came across a long explanation, or rather, intricate puzzles, that I read in the volume of Ezekiel, bringing together the two staffs into one community, and all the things that should be spiritually understood about the harmony between Judah and Ephraim, fitting in with this chapter. But let us follow the order of events. After the Lord was crucified by the Jews, being valued at thirty pieces of silver, and the price of his blood was thrown into the burial place of the Gentiles, who were strangers to the Law and the commandments of God, immediately the Lord, not delaying his judgment any longer, said, 'Cut off my second staff, which was properly mine, and which clung to me in such a way that in Jeremiah it is called a loincloth and a belt and a girdle, or, using the customary word, a hip-band: this second staff, once called a rope and my portion, has been cast away by me, in order that I might dissolve the covenant and brotherhood and harmony that existed between Judah and Israel, and separate brothers from one another.' That in numbering the apostles and those who repented, Judas was called again and confessed his God; but Israel and Ephraim and Joseph were called, who, remaining in the hardness of their hearts, said: We have no king but Caesar (John 19:15). Therefore, he did not introduce it to make void the covenant or testament, which I had with Judah and Israel (for even to this day he extends his hand to those who repent), but to divide believers and non-believers from one people among themselves, saying: Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and a man's foes will be those of his own household. (Matthew 10:34-35).
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Zechariah 11:14 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.