Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Yea, they despised the pleasant land, they believed not his word:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Yea, they despised H3988 the pleasant H2532 land H776, they believed H539 not his word H1697:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Next, they rejected the beautiful land, they didn't trust his promise;
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
They despised the pleasant land; they did not believe His promise.
Ask
American Standard Version
Yea, they despised the pleasant land, They believed not his word,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Yes, they despised the pleasant land. They didn’t believe his word,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Also they contemned that pleasant land, and beleeued not his worde,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And they kick against the desirable land, They have not given credence to His word.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Psalms 106:24 serves as a poignant indictment of Israel's profound unbelief and ingratitude, specifically referencing their refusal to enter the Promised Land. Despite God's miraculous deliverance and faithful provision, the generation delivered from Egypt despised the "pleasant land" that was their divine inheritance, choosing instead to believe the fearful report of ten spies over the explicit promise of the Almighty. This verse encapsulates a pivotal moment of rebellion that resulted in severe consequences, highlighting the destructive nature of distrusting God's word and despising His gifts.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Psalm 106 is a historical psalm, part of Book IV of the Psalter (Psalms 90-106). It serves as a communal confession of sin, recounting Israel's long and tragic history of rebellion against Yahweh, from the Exodus through the wilderness wanderings, the period of the Judges, and into the monarchy, culminating in exile. This psalm stands in stark contrast to Psalm 105, which celebrates God's faithfulness to His covenant. Psalm 106, however, focuses on the people's repeated unfaithfulness, framing their history as a cycle of sin, divine judgment, and merciful deliverance. Verse 24 is situated within the wilderness narrative, specifically recalling the events at Kadesh-Barnea as detailed in Numbers 13-14, a foundational moment of national failure that set the trajectory for forty years of wandering.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: The historical backdrop for Psalms 106:24 is the journey of the Israelites from Egypt to the Promised Land. After the miraculous crossing of the Red Sea and receiving the Law at Sinai, they arrived at the border of Canaan, the land promised to their patriarchs. This land, described as "flowing with milk and honey" in Exodus 3:8, was God's gracious inheritance. Culturally, the ancient Near East often viewed land as a divine gift, a symbol of blessing and covenant fidelity. The sending of twelve spies, one from each tribe, was a customary practice before military engagement. However, the people's response to the spies' report, prioritizing the formidable inhabitants over God's power and promise, revealed a deep-seated lack of trust. Their fear of the "giants" (Nephilim/Anakim) and fortified cities, despite witnessing God's overwhelming power against Egypt, demonstrated a profound spiritual amnesia and a failure to grasp the implications of their covenant relationship with Yahweh.

  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within Psalm 106 and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it underscores the theme of unbelief and distrust in God's word and power. The people's failure to "believe his word" was not merely intellectual skepticism but a profound spiritual rejection of God's ability to fulfill His promises, despite overwhelming evidence of His faithfulness. Secondly, it highlights the theme of despising God's gifts and blessings. The "pleasant land" was a tangible expression of God's covenant love and provision, yet it was scorned due to fear. This act of despising reflects a deeper ingratitude and a failure to value what God had graciously provided. Finally, the verse foreshadows the consequences of disobedience and unbelief. The immediate result of this national sin, as detailed in Numbers 14:26-35, was the condemnation of an entire generation to die in the wilderness, never entering the land they had disdained. This serves as a stark warning about the severe repercussions of failing to trust and obey God.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Despised (Hebrew, mâʼaç', H3988): Based on the provided H3988 data, this primitive root means "to spurn; also (intransitively) to disappear." Its semantic range includes "abhor, cast away (off), contemn, despise, disdain, (become) loathe(some), refuse, reject, reprobate." In Psalms 106:24, it signifies Israel's active, willful, and contemptuous rejection of God's gracious gift, the land of Canaan. It implies a deep-seated disrespect and disdain for God's provision and promise, viewing it as vile or worthless rather than delightful.
  • Pleasant (Hebrew, chemdâh', H2532): As the feminine form of H2532, this word denotes "delight," "desire," "goodly," or "precious." When applied to the land (H776, ʼerets), it highlights the inherent desirability, beauty, and goodness of Canaan as God's chosen inheritance for His people. The psalm uses this term to emphasize the profound irony: God presented them with a land that was truly delightful and precious, yet they actively despised it, showcasing their ingratitude and flawed perception.
  • Believed (Hebrew, ʼâman', H539): This primitive root (H539) fundamentally means "to build up or support; to foster as a parent or nurse; figuratively to render (or be) firm or faithful, to trust or believe, to be permanent or quiet; morally to be true or certain." The negative construction "believed not" (Hebrew: lo' he'eminu) signifies a failure to put trust or faith in God's reliability and His spoken word (H1697, dâbâr). It indicates a fundamental breakdown of relational trust, which is the cornerstone of the covenant, leading to a rejection of God's truth and promises.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Yea, they despised the pleasant land,": This clause immediately establishes the core sin: a contemptuous rejection of God's gracious gift. The "pleasant land" refers to Canaan, the promised inheritance, described in terms of its beauty and desirability by God Himself. The people's act of despising it reveals a profound ingratitude and a failure to value what God had prepared for them, prioritizing their fears over His promises.
  • "they believed not his word:": This second clause identifies the root cause of their despising the land. Their rejection stemmed from a fundamental lack of faith in God's spoken promise. Despite all the miracles they had witnessed – the Exodus, the parting of the Red Sea, the manna from heaven – they chose to believe the fearful report of the spies over the omnipotent word of God. This highlights that their primary sin was not just disobedience, but the underlying distrust in God's faithfulness and power to fulfill what He had declared.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several powerful literary devices. Parallelism is evident, as the two clauses, "they despised the pleasant land" and "they believed not his word," are syntactically and semantically linked, with the second clause explaining the first. The despising of the land is a direct consequence of their unbelief in God's word. There is also a strong sense of Irony, as the people rejected a land described as "pleasant" or "delightful," a divine gift, because of their fear and lack of faith. This highlights the tragic contrast between God's benevolent provision and humanity's shortsightedness. The "pleasant land" itself functions as a Symbol of God's covenant blessings and faithfulness, and their rejection of it symbolizes their rejection of God's covenant promises. The psalm also uses Retrospection by looking back at a critical historical event, drawing a lesson from the past for the present generation.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Psalms 106:24 is a foundational verse for understanding the critical role of faith in the biblical narrative and the severe consequences of unbelief. Theologically, it underscores that God's promises are contingent not on human merit, but on human trust. The "pleasant land" was a tangible expression of God's covenant faithfulness, and the people's rejection of it was, in essence, a rejection of God Himself. This event serves as a powerful Old Testament paradigm for the dangers of a hardened heart and a failure to appropriate God's grace through faith. It reveals that unbelief is not merely a passive state but an active rebellion against the character and word of God, leading to exclusion from His promised blessings. The New Testament frequently draws upon this historical example as a solemn warning for believers.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Psalms 106:24 serves as a timeless and sobering warning for all who claim to follow God. It challenges us to honestly examine the state of our faith, particularly when faced with obstacles or perceived "giants" in our lives. Do we allow fear, doubt, or the intimidating nature of circumstances to overshadow the clear, powerful promises of God? This verse calls us to cultivate a robust, active faith that trusts God's word more than our senses or the reports of the world. It reminds us that God's blessings, like the "pleasant land," are often received through courageous faith, not through human strength or perfect understanding. To despise God's gifts, whether spiritual or material, because of unbelief is to forfeit the fullness of His purposes for our lives. We are called to value His promises, embrace His provisions, and walk in confident obedience, knowing that His word is utterly reliable, even when the path ahead seems daunting.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "pleasant lands" or divine promises might I be despising or neglecting in my life due to fear or unbelief?
  • In what areas of my life am I struggling to believe God's word, and what are the underlying reasons for this distrust?
  • How does my response to challenges reveal the true object of my trust – God's power or my own limitations/circumstances?
  • What practical steps can I take to cultivate a deeper, more resilient faith in God's promises?

FAQ

What does "despised the pleasant land" truly mean in this context?

Answer: "Despised the pleasant land" means that the Israelites actively rejected and scorned the land of Canaan, which God had promised them and described as a land of delight and abundance. This rejection was not merely a passive dislike but a willful act of contempt, stemming from their fear of the land's inhabitants (the "giants") and their profound unbelief in God's ability to deliver on His promise. They saw the obstacles as greater than God's power, effectively devaluing and turning away from the very gift God intended as their inheritance and blessing. This act of despising the land was a direct manifestation of their deeper sin: despising God's word and His faithfulness. The full account is found in Numbers 13-14, where ten of the twelve spies brought back a fearful report that led the people to weep, complain, and even desire to return to Egypt, rejecting the land God had prepared for them.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Psalms 106:24, with its stark portrayal of Israel's unbelief and their forfeiture of the physical promised land, finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the New Covenant. The "pleasant land" of Canaan, though a tangible blessing, was ultimately a shadow of a greater, spiritual inheritance. In Christ, believers are offered not merely a physical land, but an eternal "rest" and a spiritual inheritance in the heavenly places (as described in Hebrews 4:1-11). Just as Israel's unbelief prevented them from entering Canaan, so too does unbelief prevent people from entering into God's eternal rest and experiencing the fullness of salvation found in Jesus. Christ is the ultimate "pleasant land," the true embodiment of God's promises and the source of all blessing. He is the faithful One whom Israel failed to trust. Through His perfect obedience and atoning sacrifice, He has secured for His people an inheritance that cannot perish, spoil, or fade (1 Peter 1:3-5). Those who believe in Him, unlike the generation in the wilderness, are not condemned to wander in a spiritual wilderness but are brought into the very presence of God, inheriting eternal life and all spiritual blessings in Him (Ephesians 1:3). Thus, the warning of Psalms 106:24 serves to highlight the supreme importance of faith in Christ, the ultimate fulfillment of all God's promises, through whom we receive access to the true and everlasting "pleasant land."

Copy as

Commentary on Psalms 106 verses 13–33

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

This is an abridgment of the history of Israel's provocations in the wilderness, and of the wrath of God against them for those provocations: and this abridgment is abridged by the apostle, with application to us Christians (Co1 10:5, etc.); for these things were written for our admonition, that we sin not like them, lest we suffer like them.

I. The cause of their sin was disregard to the works and word of God, Psa 106:13. 1. They minded not what he had done for them: They soon forgot his works, and lost the impressions they had made upon them. Those that do not improve God's mercies to them, nor endeavour in some measure to render according to the benefit done unto them, do indeed forget them. This people soon forgot them (God took notice of this, Exo 32:8, They have turned aside quickly): They made haste, they forgot his works (so it is in the margin), which some make to be two separate instances of their sin. They made haste; their expectations anticipated God's promises; they expected to be in Canaan shortly, and because they were not they questioned whether they should ever be there and quarrelled with all the difficulties they met with in their way; whereas he that believeth does not make haste, Isa 28:16. And, withal, they forgot his works, which were the undeniable evidences of his wisdom, power, and goodness, and denied the conclusion as confidently as if they had never seen the premises proved. This is mentioned again (Psa 106:21, Psa 106:22): They forgot God their Saviour; that is, they forgot that he had been their Saviour. Those that forget the works of God forget God himself, who makes himself known by his works. They forgot what was done but a few days before, which we may suppose they could not but talk of, even then, when, because they did not make a good use of it, they are said to forget it: it was what God did for them in Egypt, in the land of Ham, and by the Red Sea, things which we at this distance cannot, or should not, be unmindful of. They are called great things (for, though the great God does nothing mean, yet he does some things that are in a special manner great), wondrous works, out of the common road of Providence, therefore observable, therefore memorable, and terrible things, awful to them, and dreadful to their enemies, and yet soon forgotten. Even miracles that were seen passed away with them as tales that are told. 2. They minded not what God had said to them nor would they depend upon it: They waited not for his counsel, did not attend his word, though they had Moses to be his mouth to them; they took up resolves about which they did not consult him and made demands without calling upon him. They would be in Canaan directly, and had not patience to tarry God's time. The delay was intolerable, and therefore the difficulties were looked upon as insuperable. This is explained (Psa 106:24): They believed not his word, his promise that he would make them masters of Canaan; and (Psa 106:25), They hearkened not to the voice of the Lord, who gave them counsel which they would not wait for, not only by Moses and Aaron, but by Caleb and Joshua, Num 14:6, Num 14:7, etc. Those that will not wait for God's counsel shall justly be given up to their own hearts' lusts, to walk in their own counsels.

II. Many of their sins are here mentioned, together with the tokens of God's displeasure which they fell under for those sins.

1.They would have flesh, and yet would not believe that God could give it to them (Psa 106:14): They lusted a lust (so the word is) in the wilderness; there, where they had bread enough and to spare, yet nothing would serve them but they must have flesh to eat. They were now purely at God's finding, being supported entirely by miracles, so that this was a reflection upon the wisdom and goodness of their Creator. They were also, in all probability, within a step of Canaan, yet had not patience to stay for dainties till they came thither. They had flocks and herds of their own, but they will not kill them; God must give them flesh as he gave them bread, or they will never give him credit, or their good word. They did not only wish for flesh, but they lusted exceedingly after it. A desire, even of lawful things, when it is inordinate and violent, becomes sinful; and therefore this is called lusting after evil things (Co1 10:6), though the quails, as God's gift, were good things, and were so spoken of, Psa 105:40. Yet this was not all: They tempted God in the desert, where they had had such experience of his goodness and power, and questioned whether he could and would gratify them herein. See Psa 78:19, Psa 78:20. Now how did God show his displeasure against them for this. We are told how (Psa 106:15): He gave them their request, but gave it them in anger, and with a curse, for he sent leanness into their soul; he filled them with uneasiness of mind, and terror of conscience, and a self-reproach, occasioned by their bodies being sick with the surfeit, such as sometimes drunkards experience after a great debauch. Or this is put for that great plague with which the Lord smote them, while the flesh was yet between their teeth, as we read, Num 11:33. It was the consumption of the life. Note, (1.) What is asked in passion is often given in wrath. (2.) Many that fare deliciously every day, and whose bodies are healthful and fat, have, at the same time, leanness in their souls, no love to God, no thankfulness, no appetite to the bread of life, and then the soul must needs be lean. Those wretchedly forget themselves that feast their bodies and starve their souls. Then God gives the good things of this life in love, when with them he gives grace to glorify him in the use of them; for then the soul delights itself in fatness, Isa 55:2.

2.They quarrelled with the government which God had set over them both in church and state (Psa 106:16): They envied Moses his authority in the camp, as generalissimo of the armies of Israel and chief justice in all their courts; they envied Aaron his power, as saint of the Lord, consecrated to the office of high priest, and Korah would needs put in for the pontificate, while Dathan and Abiram, as princes of the tribe of Reuben, Jacob's eldest son, would claim to be chief magistrates, by the so-much-admired right of primogeniture. Note, Those are preparing ruin for themselves who envy those whom God has put honour upon and usurp the dignities they were never designed for. And justly will contempt be poured upon those who put contempt upon any of the saints of the Lord. How did God show his displeasure for this? We are told how, and it is enough to make us tremble (Psa 106:17, Psa 106:18); we have the story, Num 16:32, Num 16:35. (1.) Those that flew in the face of the civil authority were punished by the earth, which opened and swallowed them up, as not fit to go upon God's ground, because they would not submit to God's government. (2.) Those that would usurp the ecclesiastical authority in things pertaining to God suffered the vengeance of heaven, for fire came out from the Lord and consumed them, and the pretending sacrificers were themselves sacrificed to divine justice. The flame burnt up the wicked; for though they vied with Aaron, the saint of the Lord, for holiness (Num 16:3, Num 16:5), yet God adjudged them wicked, and as such cut them off, as in due time he will destroy the man of sin, that wicked one, notwithstanding his proud pretensions to holiness.

3.They made and worshipped the golden calf, and this in Horeb, where the law was given, and where God had expressly said, Thou shalt neither make any graven image nor bow down to it; they did both: They made a calf and worshipped it, Psa 106:19.

(1.)Herein they bade defiance to, and put an affront upon, the two great lights which God has made to rule the moral world: - [1.] That of human reason; for they changed their glory, their God, at least the manifestation of him, which always had been in a cloud (either a dark cloud or a bright one), without any manner of visible similitude, into the similitude of Apis, one of the Egyptian idols, an ox that eateth grass, than which nothing could be more grossly and scandalously absurd, Psa 106:20. Idolaters are perfectly besotted, and put the greatest disparagement possible both upon God, in representing him by the image of a beast, and upon themselves, in worshipping it when they have so done. That which is here said to be the changing of their glory is explained by St. Paul (Rom 1:23) to be the changing of the glory of the incorruptible God. [2.] That of divine revelation, which was afforded to them, not only in the words God spoke to them, but in the works he wrought for them, wondrous works, which declared aloud that the Lord Jehovah is the only true and living God and is alone to be worshipped, Psa 106:21, Psa 106:22.

(2.)For this God showed his displeasure by declaring the decree that he would cut them off from being a people, as they had, as far as lay in their power, in effect cut him off from being a God; he spoke of destroying them (Psa 106:23), and certainly he would have done it if Moses, his chosen, had not stood before him in the breach (Psa 106:23), if he had not seasonably interposed to deal with God as an advocate about the breach or ruin God was about to devote them to and wonderfully prevailed to turn away his wrath. See here the mercy of God, and how easily his anger is turned away, even from a provoking people. See the power of prayer, and the interest which God's chosen have in heaven. See a type of Christ, God's chosen, his elect, in whom his soul delights, who stood before him in the breach to turn away his wrath from a provoking world, and ever lives, for this end, making intercession.

4.They gave credit to the report of the evil spies concerning the land of Canaan, in contradiction to the promise of God (Psa 106:24): They despised the pleasant land. Canaan was a pleasant land, Deu 8:7. They undervalued it when they thought it not worth venturing for, no, not under the guidance of God himself, and therefore were for making a captain and returning to Egypt again. They believed not God's word concerning it, but murmured in their tents, basely charging God with a design upon them in bringing them thither that they might become a prey to the Canaanites, Num 14:2, Num 14:3. And, when they were reminded of God's power and promise, they were so far from hearkening to that voice of the Lord that they attempted to stone those who spoke to them, Num 14:10. The heavenly Canaan is a pleasant land. A promise is left us of entering into it; but there are many that despise it, that neglect and refuse the offer of it, that prefer the wealth and pleasure of this world before it, and grudge the pains and hazards of this life to obtain that. This also was so displeasing to God that he lifted up his hand against them, in a way of threatening, to destroy them in the wilderness; nay, in a way of swearing, for he swore in his wrath that they should not enter into his rest (Psa 95:11; Num 14:28); nay, and he threatened that their children also should be overthrown and scattered (Psa 106:26, Psa 106:27), and the whole nation dispersed and disinherited; but Moses prevailed for mercy for their seed, that they might enter Canaan. Note, Those who despise God's favours, and particularly the pleasant land, forfeit his favours, and will be shut out for ever from the pleasant land.

5.They were guilty of a great sin in the matter of Peor; and this was the sin of the new generation, when they were within a step of Canaan (Psa 106:28): They joined themselves to Baal-peor, and so were entangled both in idolatry and in adultery, in corporeal and in spiritual whoredom, Num 25:1-3. Those that did often partake of the altar of the living God now ate the sacrifices of the dead, of the idols of Moab (that were dead images, or dead men canonized or deified), or sacrifices to the infernal deities on the behalf of their dead friends. Thus they provoked God to anger with their inventions (Psa 106:29), in contempt of him and his institutions, his commands, and his threatenings. The iniquity of Peor was so great that, long after, it is said, They were not cleansed from it, Jos 22:17. God testified his displeasure at this, (1.) By sending a plague among them, which in a little time swept away 24,000 of those impudent sinners. (2.) By stirring up Phinehas to use his power as a magistrate for the suppressing of the sin and checking the contagion of it. He stood up in his zeal for the Lord of hosts, and executed judgment upon Zimri and Cozbi, sinners of the first rank, genteel sinners; he put the law in execution upon them, and this was a service so pleasing to God that upon it the plague was stayed, Psa 106:30. By this, and some other similar acts of public justice on that occasion (Num 25:4, Num 25:5), the guilt ceased to be national, and the general controversy was let fall. When the proper officers did their duty God left it to them, and did not any longer keep the work in his own hands by the plague. Note, National justice prevents national judgments. But, Phinehas herein signalizing himself, a special mark of honour was put upon him, for what he did was counted to him for righteousness to all generations (Psa 106:31), and, in recompence of it, the priesthood was entailed on his family. He shall make an atonement by offering up the sacrifices, who had so bravely made an atonement (so some read it, Psa 106:30) by offering up the sinners. Note, It is the honour of saints to be zealous against sin.

6.They continued their murmurings to the very last of their wanderings; for in the fortieth year they angered God at the waters of strife (Psa 106:32), which refers to that story, Num 20:3-5. And that which aggravated it now was that it went ill with Moses for their sakes; for, though he was the meekest of all the men in the earth, yet their clamours at that time were so peevish and provoking that they put him into a passion, and, having now grown very old and off his guard, he spoke unadvisedly with his lips (Psa 106:33), and not as became him on that occasion; for he said in a heat, Hear now, you rebels, must we fetch water out of this rock for you? This was Moses's infirmity, and is written for our admonition, that we may learn, when we are in the midst of provocation, to keep our mouth as with a bridle (Psa 39:1-3), and to take heed to our spirits, that they admit not resentments too much; for, when the spirit is provoked, it is much ado, even for those that have a great deal of wisdom and grace, not to speak unadvisedly. But it is charged upon the people as their sin: They provoked his spirit with that with which they angered God himself. Note, We must answer not only for our own passions, but for the provocation which by them we give to the passions of others, especially of those who, if not greatly provoked, would be meek and quiet. God shows his displeasure against this sin of theirs by shutting Moses and Aaron out of Canaan for their misconduct upon this occasion, by which, (1.) God discovered his resentment of all such intemperate heats, even in the dearest of his servants. If he deals thus severely with Moses for one unadvised word, what does their sin deserve who have spoken so many presumptuous wicked words? If this was done in the green tree, what shall be done in the dry? (2.) God deprived them of the blessing of Moses's guidance and government at a time when they most needed it, so that his death was more a punishment to them than to himself. It is just with God to remove those relations from us that are blessings to us, when we are peevish and provoking to them and grieve their spirits.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 13–33. Public domain.
Copy as
Augustine of HippoAD 430
Exposition on Psalm 106
"Yea, they thought scorn of that pleasant land" [Psalm 106:24]. But had they seen it? How then could they scorn that which they had not seen, except as the following words explain, "and believed not in His words." Indeed, unless that land which was styled the land that flowed with milk and honey, [Exodus 3:8] signified something great, through which, as by a visible token, He was leading those who understood His wondrous works to invisible grace and the kingdom of heaven, they could not be blamed for scorning that land, whose temporal kingdom we also ought to esteem as nothing, that we may love that Jerusalem which is free, the mother of us all, [Galatians 4:26] which is in heaven, and truly to be desired. But rather unbelief is here reproved, since they gave no credence to the words of God, who was leading them to great things through small things, and hastening to bless themselves with temporal things, which they carnally savoured of, they "abided not His counsel," as is said above.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Psalms 106:24 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.