See on the biblical-era map

Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Numbers 16:12–22. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here is, I. The insolence of Dathan and Abiram, and their treasonable remonstrance. Moses had heard what Korah had to say, and had answered it; now he summons Dathan and Abiram to bring in their complaints (Num 16:12); but they would not obey his summons, either because they could not for shame say that to his face which they were resolved to say, and then it is an instance of some remains of modesty in them; or, rather, because they would not so far own his authority, and then it is an instance of the highest degree of impudence. They spoke the language of Pharaoh himself, who set Moses at defiance, but they forgot how dearly he paid for it. Had not their heads been wretchedly heated, and their hearts hardened, they might have considered that, if they regarded not these messengers, Moses could soon in God's name send messengers of death for them. But thus the God of this world blinds the minds of those that believe not. But by the same messengers they send their articles of impeachment against Moses; and the charge runs very high. 1. They charge him with having done them a great deal of wrong in bringing them out of Egypt, invidiously calling that a land flowing with milk and honey, Num 16:13. Onions, and garlick, and fish, they had indeed plenty of in Egypt, but it never pretended to milk and honey; only they would thus banter the promise of Canaan. Ungrateful wretches, to represent that as an injury to them which was really the greatest favour that ever was bestowed upon any people! 2. They charge him with a design upon their lives, that he intended to kill them in the wilderness, though they were so well provided for. And, if they were sentenced to die in the wilderness, they must thank themselves. Moses would have healed them, and they would not be healed. 3. They charge him with a design upon their liberties, that he meant to enslave them, by making himself a prince over them. A prince over them! Was he not a tender father to them? nay, their devoted servant for the Lord's sake? Had they not their properties secured, their order preserved, and justice impartially administered? Did they not live in ease and honour? And yet they complain as if Moses's yoke were heavier than Pharaoh's. And did Moses make himself a prince? Far from it. How gladly would he have declined the office at first! How gladly would he have resigned it many a time since! And yet he is thus put under the blackest characters of a tyrant and a usurper. 4. They charge him with cheating them, raising their expectations of a good land, and then defeating them (Num 16:14): Thou hast not brought us, as thou promisedst us, into a land that floweth with milk and honey; and pray whose fault was that? He had brought them to the borders of it, and was just ready, under God, to put them in possession of it; but they thrust it away from them, and shut the door against themselves; so that it was purely their own fault that they were not now in Canaan, and yet Moses must bear the blame. Thus when the foolishness of man perverteth his way his heart fretteth against the Lord, Pro 19:3. 5. They charge him in the general with unfair dealing, that he put out the eyes of these men, and then meant to lead them blindfold as he pleased. The design of all he did for them was to open their eyes, and yet they insinuate that he intended to put out their eyes, that they might not see themselves imposed upon. Note, The wisest and best cannot please every body, nor gain the good word of all. Those often fall under the heaviest censures who have merited the highest applause. Many a good work Moses had shown them from the Father, and for which of these do they reproach him?
II.Moses's just resentment of their insolence, Num 16:15.
Moses, though the meekest man, yet, finding God reproached in him, was very wroth; he could not bear to see a people ruining themselves for whose salvation he had done so much. In this discomposure,
1.He appeals to God concerning his own integrity; whereas they basely reflected upon him as ambitious, covetous, and oppressive, in making himself a prince over them, God was his witness,
(1.)That he never got any thing by them: I have not taken one ass from them, not only not by way of bribery and extortion, but not by way of recompence or gratuity for all the good offices he had done them; he never took the pay of a general, or the salary of a judge, much less the tribute of a prince. He got more in his estate when he kept Jethro's flock than when he came to be king in Jeshurun.
(2.)That they never lost any thing by him: Neither have I hurt any one of them, no, not the least, no, not the worst, no, not those that had been most peevish and provoking to him: he never abused his power to the support of wrong. Note, Those that have never blemished themselves need not fear being slurred by others: when men condemn us we may be easy, if our own hearts condemn us not.
2.He begs of God to plead his cause, and clear him, by showing his displeasure at the incense which Korah and his company were to offer, with whom Dathan and Abiram were in confederacy. Lord, says he, Respect not thou their offering. Herein he seems to refer to the history of Cain, lately written by his own hand, of whom it is said that to him and his offering God had not respect, Gen 4:5. These that followed the gainsaying of Korah walked in the way of Cain (these are put together, Jde 1:11), and therefore he prays that they might be frowned upon as Cain was, and put to the same confusion.
III.Issue joined between Moses and his accusers.
1.Moses challenges them to appear with Aaron next morning, at the time of offering up the morning incense, and refer the matter to God's judgment, Num 16:16, Num 16:17. Since he could not convince them by his calm and affectionate reasoning, he is ready to enter into bonds to stand God's award, not doubting but that God would appear, to decide the controversy. This reference he had agreed to before (Num 16:6, Num 16:7), and here adds only one clause, which bespeaks his great condescension to the plaintiffs, that Aaron, against whose advancement they excepted, though now advanced by the divine institution to the honour of burning incense within the tabernacle, yet, upon this trial, should put himself into the place of a probationer, and stand upon the level with Korah, at the door of the tabernacle; nay, and Moses himself would stand with them, so that the complainant shall have all the fair dealing he can desire; and thus every mouth shall be stopped.
2.Korah accepts the challenge, and makes his appearance with Moses and Aaron at the door of the tabernacle, to make good his pretensions, Num 16:18, Num 16:19. If he had not had a very great stock of impudence, he could not have carried on the matter thus far. Had not he lately seen Nadab and Abihu, the consecrated priests, struck dead for daring to offer incense with unhallowed fire? and could he and his accomplices expect to fare any better in offering incense with unhallowed hands? Yet, to confront Moses and Aaron, in the height of his pride he thus bids defiance to Heaven, and pretends to demand the divine acceptance without a divine warrant; thus wretchedly is the heart hardened through the deceitfulness of sin. They took every man his censer. Perhaps these were some of the censers which these heads of families had made use of at their family-altars, before this part of religious service was confined to the priesthood and the altar in the tabernacle (and they would bring them into use and reputation again); or they might be common chafing-dishes, which were for their ordinary use. Now to attend the solemn trial, and to be witness of the issue, one would have thought Moses should have gathered the congregation against the rebels, but it seems Korah gathered them against Moses (Num 16:19), which intimates that a great part of the congregation sided with Korah, were at his beck, and wished him success, and that Korah's hopes were very high of carrying the point against Aaron; for, had he suspected the event, he would not have coveted to make the trial thus public: but little did he think that he was now calling the congregation together to be the witnesses of his own confusion! Note, Proud and ambitious men, while they are projecting their own advancement, often prove to have been hurrying on their own shameful fall.
IV.The judgment set, and the Judge taking the tribunal, and threatening to give sentence against the whole congregation.
1.The glory of the Lord appeared, Num 16:19. The same glory that appeared to instal Aaron in his office at first (Lev 9:23) now appeared to confirm him in it, and to confound those that oppose him, and set up themselves in competition with him. The shechinah, or divine Majesty, the glory of the eternal Word, which ordinarily dwelt between the cherubim within the veil, now was publicly seen over the door of the tabernacle, to the terror of the whole congregation; for, though they saw no manner of similitude, yet probably the appearances of the light and fire were such as plainly showed God to be angry with them; as when he appeared, Num 14:10. Nothing is more terrible to those who are conscious of guilt than the appearances of divine glory; for such a glorious Being must needs be a formidable enemy.
2.God threatened to consume them all in a moment, and, in order to that, bade Moses and Aaron stand from among them, Num 16:21. God thus showed what their sin deserved, and how very provoking it was to him. See what a dangerous thing it is to have fellowship with sinners, and in the least to partake with them. Many of the congregation, it is likely, came only for company, following the crowd, or for curiosity, to see the issue, yet not coming, as they ought to have done, to bear their testimony against the rebels, and openly to declare for God and Moses, they had like to have been all consumed in a moment. If we follow the herd into which the devil has entered, it is at our peril.
V.The humble intercession of Moses and Aaron for the congregation, Num 16:22.
1.Their posture was importuning: they fell on their faces, prostrating themselves before God, as supplicants in good earnest, that they might prevail for sparing mercy. Though the people had treacherously deserted them, and struck in with those that were in arms against them, yet they approved themselves faithful to the trusts reposed in them, as shepherds of Israel, who were to stand in the breach when they saw the flock in danger. Note, If others fail in their duty to us, this does not discharge us from our duty to them, nor take off the obligations we lie under to seek their welfare.
2.Their prayer was a pleading prayer, and it proved a prevailing one. Now God would have destroyed them if Moses had not turned away his wrath (Psa 106:23); yet far be it from us to imagine that Moses was more considerate or more compassionate than God in such a case as this: but God saw fit to show his just displeasure against the sin of sinners by the sentence, and at the same time to show his gracious condescension to the prayers of the saints, by the revocation of the sentence at the intercession of Moses. Observe in the prayer,
(1.)The title they give to God: The God of the spirits of all flesh. See what man is; he is a spirit in flesh, a soul embodied, a creature wonderfully compounded of heaven and earth. See what God is; he is the God of the spirits of all mankind. He forms the spirit, Zac 12:1. He fathers it, Heb 12:9. He has an ability to fashion it (Psa 33:15), and authority to dispose of it, for he has said, All souls are mine, Eze 18:4. They insinuate hereby that though, as the God of the spirits of all flesh, he might in sovereignty consume this congregation in a moment, yet it was to be hoped that he would in mercy spare them, not only because they were the work of his own hands, and he had a propriety in them, but because, being the God of spirits, he knew their frame, and could distinguish between the leaders and the led, between those who sinned maliciously and those who were drawn in by their wiles, and would make a difference accordingly in his judgments.
(2.)The argument they insist on; it is much the same with that which Abraham urged in his intercession for Sodom (Gen 18:23): Wilt thou destroy the righteous with the wicked? Such is the plea here: Shall one man sin and wilt thou be wroth with all the congregation? Not but that it was the sin of them all to join in this matter, but the great transgression was his that first hatched the treason. Note, Whatever God may do in sovereignty and strict justice, we have reason to hope that he will not destroy a congregation for the sin of one, but that, righteousness and peace having kissed each other in the undertaking of the Redeemer, mercy shall rejoice against judgment. Moses knew that all the congregation must perish in the wilderness by degrees, yet he is thus earnest in prayer that they might not be consumed at once, and would reckon it a favour to obtain a reprieve. Lord, let it alone this year.
Continue studying Numbers 16:12 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Numbers 16:12 records a pivotal moment of open defiance during Israel's wilderness journey, capturing the hardened hearts of Dathan and Abiram as they insolently reject Moses' summons with the blunt declaration, "We will not come up." This verse powerfully illustrates their direct challenge to God's divinely appointed leadership and their unwavering commitment to mutiny, setting the stage for the dramatic and severe divine judgment that swiftly follows.
Context
Literary Context
Numbers 16:12 is embedded within the dramatic and tragic account of Korah's rebellion, a narrative detailed comprehensively in Numbers 16. This verse immediately follows the initial, audacious challenge leveled against Moses and Aaron by Korah, Dathan, Abiram, and 250 prominent leaders of the congregation, who accuse Moses and Aaron of exalting themselves above the assembly of the Lord (Numbers 16:1-3). Moses' action of "sending to call" Dathan and Abiram represents a final, measured attempt to address their specific grievances directly and perhaps offer a chance for reconciliation or explanation before divine intervention. Their blunt and unyielding refusal in this verse underscores the depth of their rebellion and their absolute unwillingness to submit to any form of accountability, thereby escalating the conflict and paving the way for the severe and unprecedented judgment that God would soon unleash upon them and their households.
Historical & Cultural Context
The events of Numbers 16 unfold during the Israelites' protracted wilderness wanderings, a period characterized by frequent murmuring, disobedience, and challenges to God's authority and His chosen leaders, Moses and Aaron. This particular rebellion occurs after the devastating consequences of their rebellion at Kadesh-Barnea, which resulted in the 40-year decree of wandering and the death of an entire generation in the wilderness (Numbers 14). In ancient Near Eastern societies, "coming up" to an authority figure, especially one of Moses' stature, typically signified respect, submission, or a willingness to engage in a formal proceeding, whether for judgment, negotiation, or reconciliation. Dathan and Abiram's explicit refusal to "come up" was therefore far more than a logistical inconvenience; it was a profound and public act of insubordination, directly challenging Moses' God-given authority and rejecting the very structure of leadership God had established for Israel. Their defiance was a direct affront to the divinely ordained order.
Key Themes
This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Numbers and the Pentateuch. Foremost is the theme of Divine Authority versus Human Rebellion, highlighting the absolute necessity of submitting to God's chosen representatives and the severe consequences of rejecting them. It also underscores the Sanctity of God's Appointed Leadership, demonstrating that challenging Moses and Aaron was tantamount to challenging God Himself, who had ordained their roles and empowered them (Numbers 16:11). The narrative vividly portrays the Dangers of Pride and Envy, as the rebels, driven by a desire for power, status, and a perceived slight, sought to usurp roles God had not assigned to them. Finally, the verse serves as a stark Warning Against Disobedience, foreshadowing the swift and decisive divine judgment that would follow such open and unrepentant defiance against the Lord's established order and His chosen leadership.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
The verb שָׁלַח (shâlach), meaning "to send away, for, or out," describes Moses' deliberate action of dispatching messengers to Dathan and Abiram. This is not an act of immediate judgment but a measured, procedural step, indicating Moses' patience and his attempt to resolve the conflict through direct communication before resorting to more drastic measures. It highlights Moses' role as a mediator and leader who, even in the face of rebellion, seeks to follow proper protocol and offer an opportunity for the rebels to respond.
The verb קָרָא (qârâʼ), meaning "to call out to, address by name, invite," emphasizes the specific purpose of Moses' sending: to summon Dathan and Abiram into his presence. This "calling" was an invitation to appear before the legitimate authority to account for their actions, a common practice in ancient legal and social contexts. Their refusal to respond to this summons signifies a complete rejection of the established legal and spiritual order.
The verb עָלָה (ʻâlâh), meaning "to ascend, go up," is used here in a broader sense to mean "to come into the presence of" someone, especially an authority figure or to a designated place for a meeting. The strong negative particle לֹא (lo) combined with the imperfect tense of the verb expresses a firm, resolute, and unwavering refusal. Their declaration, "We will not come up," signifies not merely a logistical refusal but a profound act of absolute unwillingness to submit to Moses' authority, or even to engage in dialogue, thereby sealing their fate.
Verse Breakdown
"And Moses sent to call Dathan and Abiram, the sons of Eliab"
This clause establishes Moses' initiative and his specific target within the broader rebellion. Dathan and Abiram, as Reubenites, held a distinct grievance from Korah the Levite. As descendants of Reuben, Jacob's firstborn, they likely felt their tribal claim to preeminence had been overlooked by Moses' leadership and the selection of the tribe of Levi for priestly service. Moses' direct summons to them indicates his awareness of their specific role in the rebellion and his attempt to confront their particular challenge to his political and judicial authority, offering them a chance to present their case or repent.
"which said, We will not come up"
This is the rebels' direct, insolent, and definitive response. Their refusal is not merely a logistical inconvenience but a profound act of insubordination and open contempt. By refusing to appear before Moses, they openly declared their independence from his authority and their unwavering commitment to their mutiny. This blunt statement reveals their hardened hearts, their contempt for established order, and their utter lack of respect for God's chosen leader, effectively sealing their fate and setting the stage for the swift and dramatic divine judgment that would soon follow.
Literary Devices
The verse employs several potent literary devices that amplify its dramatic impact. Antithesis is prominently featured, contrasting Moses' patient, measured, and orderly attempt to summon the rebels with Dathan and Abiram's abrupt, defiant, and insolent refusal. This stark opposition highlights the chasm between legitimate, divinely appointed authority and rebellious insubordination. The direct, quoted dialogue, "We will not come up," serves as a powerful dramatic element, emphasizing the rebels' unyielding stance and their absolute commitment to their mutiny. This verbal defiance also functions as foreshadowing, signaling unequivocally that no reconciliation is possible through human means and that a severe divine judgment is not only imminent but necessary. Furthermore, there is an element of dramatic irony, as the audience, aware of God's power and His history of swift judgment against rebellion, knows the tragic outcome of such open defiance against Him, while Dathan and Abiram remain defiantly ignorant or dismissive of their impending doom.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Numbers 16:12 profoundly underscores the gravity of rebellion against divine authority. Dathan and Abiram's refusal to "come up" is not merely a rejection of Moses' leadership but an affront to God Himself, who ordained Moses and established the order of leadership in Israel. This act encapsulates the perennial human struggle against God's sovereignty and the dangerous allure of pride, envy, and self-exaltation. It serves as a stark reminder that challenging God's established order, whether in leadership, in His revealed will, or in the structures He has put in place, carries severe consequences. The narrative reiterates that true wisdom lies in humble submission to God's ways and His chosen instruments, even when they are imperfect, rather than in defiant self-assertion that ultimately leads to destruction.
Reflection and Application
The narrative of Dathan and Abiram's rebellion, culminating in their defiant refusal, serves as a timeless cautionary tale for believers today. It compels us to honestly examine our own hearts regarding authority—both divine and human. Do we, like Dathan and Abiram, harbor a spirit of resistance, pride, or self-interest that prevents us from submitting to legitimate leadership or God's revealed will? This passage calls us to cultivate a posture of humility, discernment, and trust in God's sovereign plan, even when His ways or His chosen instruments are challenging or difficult to understand. True spiritual maturity involves recognizing that God often works through fallible human vessels, and our ultimate allegiance is to Him. The freedom and blessing of God are found not in rebellion, but in humble obedience and submission to His divine order, recognizing that to resist God's appointed means is to resist God Himself.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What was the specific grievance of Dathan and Abiram, distinct from Korah's?
While Korah, a Levite, primarily challenged the Aaronic priesthood's exclusive right to offer incense and serve at the altar, Dathan and Abiram, from the tribe of Reuben, had a distinct grievance rooted in their tribal heritage. As descendants of Reuben, Jacob's firstborn, they likely felt that their tribe had a historical claim to preeminence and leadership that had been usurped by Moses and the tribe of Levi. Their accusations, articulated in Numbers 16:13-14, centered on Moses' perceived consolidation of power and his failure to bring them into a "land flowing with milk and honey," ironically referring to Egypt and contrasting it with the harsh wilderness. Their rebellion was thus more about political and hereditary leadership, whereas Korah's was about priestly access and privilege, though both converged in their rejection of Moses and Aaron's authority.
Why was their refusal to "come up" so significant?
Their refusal was a profound act of open insubordination and contempt, sealing their fate. In ancient Near Eastern contexts, appearing before an authority figure (especially one divinely appointed like Moses) was a sign of respect, submission, or at least a willingness to engage in a formal process. By explicitly stating, "We will not come up," Dathan and Abiram not only rejected Moses' summons but also openly declared their independence from his authority and their unwavering commitment to their rebellion. It was a public and defiant rejection of God's chosen representative, demonstrating their hardened hearts and leaving no room for reconciliation, thereby necessitating divine judgment. Their words were a direct challenge to the divinely established order and a declaration of war against God's leadership.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The defiant refusal of Dathan and Abiram to "come up" to Moses stands in stark contrast to the perfect obedience and humble submission of Jesus Christ. While these rebels sought to elevate themselves and usurp authority, Jesus, though truly God, did not cling to His divine prerogatives but "emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men" (Philippians 2:7). He did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life as a ransom for many (Mark 10:45). Unlike Dathan and Abiram, who refused to "come up" to an earthly leader, Jesus "came down" from heaven, not to do His own will, but the will of the Father who sent Him (John 6:38). His perfect obedience, even "unto death on a cross" (Philippians 2:8), stands as the ultimate antithesis to human rebellion. Through His submission, Christ became the true and ultimate authority, the great High Priest to whom all knees will one day bow (Philippians 2:10-11), offering a path to reconciliation and life for those who humble themselves and embrace His divine authority, a path tragically rejected by Dathan and Abiram.