TRV
“Jesus Before the Sanhedrin”· Matthew 26:57–68
Translation
King James Version
Then did they spit in his face, and buffeted him; and others smote him with the palms of their hands,
Complete Jewish Bible
Then they spit in his face and pounded him with their fists; and those who were beating him
American Standard Version
Then did they spit in his face and buffet him: and some smote him with the palms of their hands,
World English Bible Messianic
Then they spit in his face and beat him with their fists, and some slapped him,
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then spet they in his face, and buffeted him, and other smote him with roddes,
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 24,122 of 31,102 · 77.6%
LawLawHistoryHistPoetryPoetProphetsProphNew TestamentNT
Study This Verse
Copy as
Historical interpretation
Ten Centuries of Reception
9 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
2003004005006007008009001000110012001300
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
It was necessary for him to teach these things by example, "giving his back to whips and his cheeks to fists" and not turning his face away "from insults and spitting." Thus would he, by suffering these things in our place, deliver us (as I believe) who were worthy to suffer all that disgrace. Truly he did not "die for us" that we might not die but that we might not die for ourselves. And he was spat upon and beaten for us, so that we who were worthy of all these things because of our sins might not just suffer them but, suffering them for the sake of justice, we might gratefully accept them. Paul makes it clear that the Savior "humbled himself becoming obedient all the way to death, even to the death of the cross." … "On account of all this, God exalted him." God not only exalted him because of the death he underwent for our sake but also because of the buffeting and the spitting and all the rest.Christ did not turn his face away "from insult and spitting," so his face might be glorified more than the face of Moses42—with so much glory that comparatively the glorification of Moses' face was outshone, even as the light of a lamp is outshone by that of the sun and even as knowledge, which knows in part, is outshone "when that which is perfect has come." But they also buffeted the holy head of the church. Because of this, they will be beaten by Satan, not that they may not be extolled or may have their power brought to an end but that, once in the hands of the enemy and punisher, they may receive just punishment for the sin they committed in buffeting Jesus.
Not content with spitting in his face and buffeting him, they even struck his face with the palms of their hands, and, mocking him, they said, "Prophesy to us, O Christ! who is it that struck you?" On account of this … they have been struck and punished. Yet they were unwilling to accept any discipline, as Jeremiah had prophesied about them: "You chastened them and they did not grieve; they were unwilling to receive correction." And now whoever harms anyone in the church and does these things to him spits on the very face of Christ, and, buffeting Christ, they slap him with the palms of their hands.
Wherefore did they these things, when they were to put Him to death? What need of this mockery? That thou mightest learn their intemperate spirit by all things, and that having taken Him like a prey, they thus showed forth their intoxication, and gave full swing to their madness; making this a festival, and assaulting Him with pleasure, and showing forth their murderous disposition.
But admire, I pray thee, the self command of the disciples, with what exactness they relate these things. Hereby is clearly shown their disposition to love the truth, because they relate with all truthfulness the things that seem to be opprobrious, disguising nothing, nor being ashamed thereof, but rather accounting it very great glory, as indeed it was, that the Lord of the universe should endure to suffer such things for us. This shows both His unutterable tenderness, and the inexcusable wickedness of those men, who had the heart to do such things to Him that was so mild and meek, and was charming them with such words, as were enough to change a lion into a lamb. For neither did He fail in any things of gentleness, nor they of insolence and cruelty, in what they did, in what they said.
For what could be equal to this insolence? On that face which the sea, when it saw it, had reverenced, from which the sun, when it beheld it on the cross, turned away his rays, they did spit, and struck it with the palms of their hands, and some upon the head; giving full swing in every way to their own madness. For indeed they inflicted the blows that are most insulting of all, buffeting, smiting with the palms of their hands, and to these blows adding the insult of spitting at Him. And words again teeming with much derision did they speak, saying, "prophesy unto us, thou Christ, who is he that smote thee?" because the multitude called Him a prophet.
But another saith, that they covered His face with His own garment, and did these things, as though they had got in the midst of them some vile and worthless fellow. And not freemen only, but slaves also were intemperate with this intemperance towards Him at that time.
These things let us read continually, these things let us hear aright, these things let us write in our minds, for these are our honors. In these things do I take a pride, not only in the thousands of dead which He raised, but also in the sufferings which He endured. These things Paul puts forward in every way, the cross, the death, the sufferings, the revilings, the insults, the scoffs.
Wherefore also they were all assembled together, and it was a council of pestilent men, and they ask some questions, wishing to invest this plot with the appearance of a court of justice. For "neither did their testimonies agree together;" so feigned was the court of justice, and all things full of confusion and disorder.
"But false witnesses came, and said, This fellow said, I will destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it." And indeed He had said, "In three days," but He said not, "I will destroy," but, "Destroy," and not about that temple but about His own body.
What then doth the high priest? Willing to press Him to a defense, that by that he might take Him, he saith, "Hearest Thou not what these witness against Thee? But He held His peace."
For the attempts at defense were unprofitable, no man hearing. For this was a show only of a court of justice, but in truth an onset of robbers, assailing Him without cause, as in a cave, or on a road.
Wherefore "He held His peace," but the other continued, saying, "I adjure Thee by the living God, that Thou tell us whether Thou be the Christ, the Son of the living God. But He said, Thou hast said. Nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds. Then the high priest rent his clothes, saying, He hath spoken blasphemy." And this he did to add force to the accusation, and to aggravate what He said, by the act. For since what had been said moved the hearers to fear, what they did about Stephen, stopping their ears, this high priest doth here also.
And yet what kind of blasphemy was this? For indeed before He had said, when they were gathered together, "The Lord said unto my Lord. Sit Thou on my right hand," and interpreted the saying, and they dared say nothing, but held their peace, and from that time forth gainsaid Him no more. Why then did they now call the saying a blasphemy? And wherefore also did Christ thus answer them? To take away all their excuse, because unto the last day He taught that He was Christ, and that He sitteth at the right hand of the Father, and that He will come again to judge the world, which was the language of one manifesting His full accordance with the Father.
Having rent therefore his clothes, he saith, "What think ye?" He gives not the sentence from himself, but invites it from them, as in a case of confessed sins, and manifest blasphemy. For, inasmuch as they knew that if the thing came to be inquired into, and carefully decided, it would free Him from all blame, they condemn Him amongst themselves, and anticipate the hearers by saying, "Ye have heard the blasphemy;" all but necessitating and forcing them to deliver the sentence. What then say they? "He is guilty of death;" that having taken Him as condemned, they should thus work upon Pilate thereupon to pass sentence. In which matter those others also being accomplices say, "He is guilty of death;" themselves accusing, themselves judging, themselves passing sentence, themselves being everything then.
But wherefore did they not bring forward the Sabbaths? Because He had often stopped their mouths; and moreover they wanted to take Him, and condemn Him by the things then said. And the high priest anticipated them, and gave the sentence as from them, and drew them all on by rending his vestments, and having led Him away as now condemned unto Pilate, thus did all.
When the Chief Priests were thus assembled, this conventicle of ruffians sought to give their conspiracy the character of a legal trial. But it was entirely a scene of confusion and uproar, as what follows shows, Though many false witnesses came, yet found they none.
Why did they not bring forward now His breaking the Sabbath? Because He had so often confuted them on this point.
He said this with a design to draw from Him some indefensible answer which might be made a snare for Him. But Jesus held his peace, for defence had availed nothing when none would listen to it. For here was only a mockery of justice, it was in truth nothing more than the anarchy of a den of robbers.
This He did to give weight to the accusation, and to confirm by deeds what He taught in words.
Then, after rending his garment, he did not give sentence of himself, but asked of others, saying, What think ye? As was always done in undeniable cases of sin, and manifest blasphemy, and as by force driving them to a certain opinion, he anticipates the answer, What need we any further witnesses? Behold, now ye have heard his blasphemy. What was this blasphemy? For before He had interpreted to them as they were gathered together that text, The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, (Matt. 22:44.) and they had held their peace, and had not contradicted Him. How then do they call what He now says blasphemy? They answered and said, He is guilty of death, the same persons at once accusers, examiners, and sentencers.
(Hom. lxxxv.) As hunters who have started their game, so they exhibit a wild and drunken exultation.
Observe how circumstantially the Evangelist recounts all those particulars even which seem most disgraceful, hiding or extenuating nothing, but thinking it the highest glory that the Lord of the earth should endure such things for us. This let us read continually, let us imprint in our minds, and in these things let us boast.
He went in, either out of the attachment of a disciple, or natural curiosity, seeking to know what sentence the High Priest would pass, whether death, or scourging.
At last came two false witnesses. How are they false witnesses, when they repeat only what we read that the Lord spoke? A false witness is one who takes what is said in a different sense from that in which it was said. Now this the Lord had spoken of the temple of His Body, and they cavil at His expressions, and by a slight change and addition produce a plausible charge. The Lord's words were, Destroy this temple; (John 2:19.) this they make into, I can destroy the Temple of God. He said, Destroy, not 'I will destroy,' because it is unlawful to lay hands on ourselves. Also they phrased it, And build it again, making it apply to the temple of the Jews; but the Lord had said, And I will raise it up again, thus clearly pointing out a living and breathing temple. For to build again, and to raise again, are two different things.
Headlong and uncontrolled rage, unable to find even a false accusation, moves the High Priest from his throne, the motion of his body showing the emotion of his mind. And the High Priest arose, and said unto him, Answerest thou nothing to the things which these witness against Thee?
For as God, He knew that whatever He said would be twisted into an accusation against Him. But at this His silence before false witnesses and ungodly Priests, the High Priest was exasperated, and summons Him to answer, that from anything He says he may raise a charge against Him.
The same fury which drew the High Priest from his seat, impels him now to rend his clothes; for so it was customary with the Jews to do whenever they heard any blasphemy, or any thing against God.
And by this rending his garments, he shows that the Jews have lost the priestly glory, and that their High Priest's throne was vacant. For by rending his garment he rent the veil of the Law which covered him.
They spit in his face, and buffeted him, to fulfil the prophecy of Esaias, I gave my cheek to the smiters, and turned not away my face from shame and spitting. (Isa. 50:6.)
But it would have been foolish to have answered them that smote Him, and to have declared the smiter, seeing that in their madness they seem to have struck Him openly.
(Verse 67.) Then they spat in his face and struck him with their fists. As it was foretold: I have given my cheeks to those who struck me; I have not turned my face from disgrace and spitting. (Lamentations 3:30)
(Quaest. Ev. i. 44.) That, they did spit in his face, signifies those who reject His proffered grace. They likewise buffet Him who prefer their own honour to Him; and they smite Him on the face, who, blinded with unbelief, affirm that He is not yet come, disowning and rejecting His person.
This is clearly a reflection of the holy prophet’s words, “Be appalled at this, O heavens, and shudder with great fear,” says “the Lord,” the one true God, the king of kings and Lord of lords. He was dishonored by us: first he endured blows, and then he endured laughter from the impious, exemplifying the highest forbearance yet presented to us. How can the one who “examines heart and mind,” the one who illumines prophets, not know “who strikes you”?
(ord) Prophesy unto us is said in ridicule of His claim to be held as a Prophet by the people.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying Matthew 26:67 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Matthew 26:67 profoundly details the immediate, brutal aftermath of Jesus' condemnation by the Jewish Sanhedrin, where He was subjected to extreme physical abuse and profound humiliation. This verse captures a pivotal moment in His passion, revealing the depth of human malice and the unwavering resolve of Christ as He endured spitting, striking with fists, and slapping—acts designed to degrade and dishonor, all while fulfilling ancient prophecies concerning the suffering Messiah.
Context
Literary Context
This verse immediately follows the climactic moment of Jesus' trial before the Sanhedrin, as recorded in Matthew 26:57-66. After a series of false testimonies failed to secure a conviction, the High Priest Caiaphas directly challenged Jesus, asking if He was "the Christ, the Son of God" (Matthew 26:63). Jesus' affirmative, unequivocal response—"You have said it, and in fact, you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven" (Matthew 26:64)—was immediately deemed blasphemy by Caiaphas, who tore his robes in a dramatic gesture of outrage. The entire council then condemned Him to death. Matthew 26:67 marks the abrupt transition from a pseudo-legal proceeding to a raw, unrestrained outburst of contempt and violence, illustrating the intense hatred and rejection Jesus faced from the religious establishment before He was handed over to the Roman authorities for further trial and execution.
Historical & Cultural Context
In the ancient Near East, spitting in someone's face was an act of profound disrespect and utter contempt, signifying the deepest possible revulsion and dishonor. It was a public shaming ritual, stripping the victim of dignity and status. Similarly, "buffeting" (striking with the fist, often on the head or face) and "smoting with the palms of their hands" (slapping) were not merely forms of physical assault but deliberate acts of humiliation. For a person of any standing, let alone one claiming divine authority, such treatment was the ultimate insult, designed to break their spirit and publicly shame them. The Jewish Sanhedrin, while having the authority to condemn Jesus for blasphemy, lacked the legal power under Roman occupation to carry out a death sentence. Therefore, this physical abuse served as an expression of their immediate fury and contempt, a prelude to the Roman trial that would ultimately lead to His crucifixion.
Key Themes
Matthew 26:67 contributes significantly to several overarching themes within Matthew's Gospel and the broader biblical narrative. It powerfully highlights the profound humiliation and mockery Jesus endured, underscoring the depths to which humanity would sink in rejecting divine truth. This abuse serves as a stark depiction of the suffering of Christ, an early stage of the physical and emotional agony that would culminate in His crucifixion, emphasizing the immense personal cost of His mission to redeem humanity. Crucially, these indignities directly contribute to the theme of fulfillment of prophecy, particularly those concerning the Suffering Servant in Isaiah, such as Isaiah 50:6 where the servant declares, "I offered my back to those who beat me, my cheeks to those who pulled out my beard; I did not hide my face from mocking and spitting." The verse also vividly portrays the injustice and human depravity inherent in the rejection of God's Anointed One, revealing the dark side of humanity's capacity for malice and violence when confronted with divine truth.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
Derived from "en" (in) and "ptyo" (to spit), this word means "to spit at or on." In ancient cultures, spitting on someone was an act of extreme contempt, revulsion, and public shaming. It was a deliberate act of defilement and dishonor, designed to degrade the recipient to the lowest possible status. The use of this word here emphasizes the profound disrespect and utter scorn directed at Jesus.
This term comes from a derivative of the base of "kolazo" (to punish). It specifically means "to rap with the fist," implying striking with closed hands, often on the head or face. This was a forceful, repeated form of physical abuse that went beyond mere insult, inflicting pain and further degrading the victim. The action suggests a violent outburst of anger and malice, not just a casual slap.
From a derivative of a primary word meaning "to let fall" or "rap," this word means "to slap" or "strike with an open hand," particularly on the face or cheeks. While perhaps less forceful than "buffeting," it was still a common and deeply insulting form of personal abuse, often used to express contempt or to silence someone. The combination of these actions—spitting, punching, and slapping—paints a picture of comprehensive physical and emotional assault.
Verse Breakdown
"Then did they spit in his face"
This clause immediately follows the Sanhedrin's condemnation of Jesus. The act of spitting in someone's face was not merely a physical assault but a profound cultural insult, signifying utter contempt, disgust, and public humiliation. It was a deliberate attempt to defile and dishonor Jesus, stripping Him of any dignity or respect in the eyes of His accusers and onlookers.
"and buffeted him;"
Following the spitting, they escalated the physical abuse by "buffeting" Him. This refers to striking Him with their fists, likely on the head and face. This action implies forceful, repeated blows, designed to inflict pain and further degrade Him. It demonstrates a raw, violent outpouring of hatred from those who had just condemned Him.
"and others smote [him] with the palms of their hands,"
This final clause indicates that the abuse was widespread, with "others" joining in the assault. "Smote with the palms of their hands" refers to slapping, specifically on the face or cheeks. This act, while perhaps less violent than punching, was equally insulting and humiliating, a common form of personal abuse meant to demean and dishonor. The cumulative effect of these actions underscores the intense malice and widespread rejection Jesus faced.
Literary Devices
Matthew 26:67 employs several powerful literary devices to convey its profound message. The vivid description of physical abuse serves as Pathos, evoking deep sympathy and sorrow for Jesus' suffering, highlighting the immense personal cost of His mission. The actions themselves—spitting, buffeting, and slapping—are rich in Symbolism, representing the ultimate human rejection and contempt for divine truth. This scene also functions as powerful Foreshadowing, hinting at the greater physical and emotional agony Jesus would endure on the cross, making it clear that His suffering began long before Calvary. Furthermore, there is a profound Irony in this scene: the Son of God, the rightful King and Judge of all humanity, is treated as the lowest criminal by those He came to save, highlighting humanity's spiritual blindness and rebellion against its Creator.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Matthew 26:67 stands as a stark testament to the depth of human depravity and the unwavering commitment of Christ to His redemptive mission. The abuse Jesus endured was not random violence but a deliberate act of humiliation, fulfilling ancient prophecies and demonstrating the extent of His self-emptying love. Theologically, it underscores the reality of sin's ugliness and humanity's rebellion against God, even as it magnifies the grace and sovereignty of God who allowed His Son to suffer for the sake of humanity's salvation. This moment is a crucial component of Christ's atoning work, where He, though innocent, bore the shame and suffering due to a sinful humanity, thereby paving the way for reconciliation with God.
Reflection and Application
Matthew 26:67 offers a profound invitation for believers to contemplate the depth of Christ's sacrifice and the nature of true discipleship. Witnessing Jesus' silent endurance in the face of such profound indignity calls us to a deeper appreciation for the cost of our salvation—not merely physical pain, but utter humiliation and rejection. It challenges us to consider how we respond when faced with scorn, injustice, or opposition for our faith. Jesus' example teaches us patience, grace, and non-retaliation, reminding us that suffering for righteousness' sake aligns us with our Lord. This verse encourages us to identify with Christ in His suffering, understanding that our own experiences of rejection or ridicule in a world often hostile to spiritual truth are but faint echoes of what He willingly endured for us. It fosters humility and strengthens our resolve to live lives worthy of such a sacrifice, prioritizing love and truth even when it comes at a personal cost.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did they treat Jesus with such extreme physical abuse and contempt?
The abuse Jesus endured in Matthew 26:67 was a direct consequence of the Sanhedrin's condemnation of Him for blasphemy. After Jesus unequivocally affirmed His divine identity as the Son of God and the Messiah (Matthew 26:63-64), the High Priest tore his clothes, declaring Jesus guilty of a capital offense. In their eyes, Jesus' claim to be the Son of God was the ultimate affront to God's holiness and an unforgivable sacrilege. The physical acts of spitting, buffeting, and slapping were not merely expressions of anger but culturally significant gestures of extreme contempt, public shaming, and utter rejection. They sought to degrade and dishonor Jesus, stripping Him of any perceived dignity or authority, reflecting the intense hatred and spiritual blindness of those who refused to accept His claims. This treatment also served to fulfill Old Testament prophecies concerning the suffering Messiah, such as those found in Isaiah 50:6.
What is the deeper significance of these specific acts of abuse (spitting, buffeting, slapping)?
The specific acts of spitting, buffeting (striking with fists), and slapping were chosen for their profound symbolic and cultural significance, going far beyond mere physical pain. In ancient societies, spitting on someone, especially in the face, was the ultimate sign of contempt, disgust, and public defilement. It was an act designed to strip a person of all honor and dignity, marking them as utterly despicable. Buffeting, or striking with the fist, particularly on the head or face, was a forceful and humiliating form of assault, meant to inflict both pain and degradation. Slapping, especially on the face, was also a common gesture of insult and disrespect, often used to demean or silence someone. Together, these actions represent a comprehensive assault on Jesus' person, not just His body. They were designed to break His spirit, publicly shame Him, and demonstrate the absolute rejection of His claims and His very being. This intentional humiliation underscores the depth of the sacrifice Jesus made, as He willingly endured such profound dishonor for the salvation of humanity, fulfilling prophecies that spoke of the Messiah being "despised and rejected by mankind" (Isaiah 53:3).
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Matthew 26:67 powerfully illustrates the Christ-centered fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy and the very nature of His atoning work. In enduring the spitting, buffeting, and slapping, Jesus perfectly embodied the Suffering Servant foretold in Isaiah 50:6, who "offered my back to those who beat me, my cheeks to those who pulled out my beard; I did not hide my face from mocking and spitting." This profound humiliation, far from diminishing His divine authority, actually magnified it, revealing His unparalleled humility and unwavering obedience to the Father's will. As the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, Jesus willingly subjected Himself to the ultimate human contempt and violence, bearing the shame and indignity that rightfully belonged to sinful humanity. His silent endurance in the face of such abuse—a stark contrast to the world's expectation of a conquering Messiah—demonstrates the very heart of His mission: to redeem humanity not through force, but through self-sacrificial love and suffering. This moment foreshadows His ultimate victory on the cross, where through His humiliation, He secured eternal glory and reconciliation for all who believe, setting the ultimate example of humility and obedience for His followers, as seen in Philippians 2:8.