TRV
“Jesus Before the Sanhedrin”· Matthew 26:57–68
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 24,123 of 31,102 · 77.6%
LawLawHistoryHistPoetryPoetProphetsProphNew TestamentNT
Study This Verse
Copy as
Historical interpretation
Ten Centuries of Reception
9 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
2003004005006007008009001000110012001300
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
It was necessary for him to teach these things by example, "giving his back to whips and his cheeks to fists" and not turning his face away "from insults and spitting." Thus would he, by suffering these things in our place, deliver us (as I believe) who were worthy to suffer all that disgrace. Truly he did not "die for us" that we might not die but that we might not die for ourselves. And he was spat upon and beaten for us, so that we who were worthy of all these things because of our sins might not just suffer them but, suffering them for the sake of justice, we might gratefully accept them. Paul makes it clear that the Savior "humbled himself becoming obedient all the way to death, even to the death of the cross." … "On account of all this, God exalted him." God not only exalted him because of the death he underwent for our sake but also because of the buffeting and the spitting and all the rest.Christ did not turn his face away "from insult and spitting," so his face might be glorified more than the face of Moses42—with so much glory that comparatively the glorification of Moses' face was outshone, even as the light of a lamp is outshone by that of the sun and even as knowledge, which knows in part, is outshone "when that which is perfect has come." But they also buffeted the holy head of the church. Because of this, they will be beaten by Satan, not that they may not be extolled or may have their power brought to an end but that, once in the hands of the enemy and punisher, they may receive just punishment for the sin they committed in buffeting Jesus.
Not content with spitting in his face and buffeting him, they even struck his face with the palms of their hands, and, mocking him, they said, "Prophesy to us, O Christ! who is it that struck you?" On account of this … they have been struck and punished. Yet they were unwilling to accept any discipline, as Jeremiah had prophesied about them: "You chastened them and they did not grieve; they were unwilling to receive correction." And now whoever harms anyone in the church and does these things to him spits on the very face of Christ, and, buffeting Christ, they slap him with the palms of their hands.
Wherefore did they these things, when they were to put Him to death? What need of this mockery? That thou mightest learn their intemperate spirit by all things, and that having taken Him like a prey, they thus showed forth their intoxication, and gave full swing to their madness; making this a festival, and assaulting Him with pleasure, and showing forth their murderous disposition.
But admire, I pray thee, the self command of the disciples, with what exactness they relate these things. Hereby is clearly shown their disposition to love the truth, because they relate with all truthfulness the things that seem to be opprobrious, disguising nothing, nor being ashamed thereof, but rather accounting it very great glory, as indeed it was, that the Lord of the universe should endure to suffer such things for us. This shows both His unutterable tenderness, and the inexcusable wickedness of those men, who had the heart to do such things to Him that was so mild and meek, and was charming them with such words, as were enough to change a lion into a lamb. For neither did He fail in any things of gentleness, nor they of insolence and cruelty, in what they did, in what they said.
For what could be equal to this insolence? On that face which the sea, when it saw it, had reverenced, from which the sun, when it beheld it on the cross, turned away his rays, they did spit, and struck it with the palms of their hands, and some upon the head; giving full swing in every way to their own madness. For indeed they inflicted the blows that are most insulting of all, buffeting, smiting with the palms of their hands, and to these blows adding the insult of spitting at Him. And words again teeming with much derision did they speak, saying, "prophesy unto us, thou Christ, who is he that smote thee?" because the multitude called Him a prophet.
But another saith, that they covered His face with His own garment, and did these things, as though they had got in the midst of them some vile and worthless fellow. And not freemen only, but slaves also were intemperate with this intemperance towards Him at that time.
These things let us read continually, these things let us hear aright, these things let us write in our minds, for these are our honors. In these things do I take a pride, not only in the thousands of dead which He raised, but also in the sufferings which He endured. These things Paul puts forward in every way, the cross, the death, the sufferings, the revilings, the insults, the scoffs.
Wherefore also they were all assembled together, and it was a council of pestilent men, and they ask some questions, wishing to invest this plot with the appearance of a court of justice. For "neither did their testimonies agree together;" so feigned was the court of justice, and all things full of confusion and disorder.
"But false witnesses came, and said, This fellow said, I will destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it." And indeed He had said, "In three days," but He said not, "I will destroy," but, "Destroy," and not about that temple but about His own body.
What then doth the high priest? Willing to press Him to a defense, that by that he might take Him, he saith, "Hearest Thou not what these witness against Thee? But He held His peace."
For the attempts at defense were unprofitable, no man hearing. For this was a show only of a court of justice, but in truth an onset of robbers, assailing Him without cause, as in a cave, or on a road.
Wherefore "He held His peace," but the other continued, saying, "I adjure Thee by the living God, that Thou tell us whether Thou be the Christ, the Son of the living God. But He said, Thou hast said. Nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds. Then the high priest rent his clothes, saying, He hath spoken blasphemy." And this he did to add force to the accusation, and to aggravate what He said, by the act. For since what had been said moved the hearers to fear, what they did about Stephen, stopping their ears, this high priest doth here also.
And yet what kind of blasphemy was this? For indeed before He had said, when they were gathered together, "The Lord said unto my Lord. Sit Thou on my right hand," and interpreted the saying, and they dared say nothing, but held their peace, and from that time forth gainsaid Him no more. Why then did they now call the saying a blasphemy? And wherefore also did Christ thus answer them? To take away all their excuse, because unto the last day He taught that He was Christ, and that He sitteth at the right hand of the Father, and that He will come again to judge the world, which was the language of one manifesting His full accordance with the Father.
Having rent therefore his clothes, he saith, "What think ye?" He gives not the sentence from himself, but invites it from them, as in a case of confessed sins, and manifest blasphemy. For, inasmuch as they knew that if the thing came to be inquired into, and carefully decided, it would free Him from all blame, they condemn Him amongst themselves, and anticipate the hearers by saying, "Ye have heard the blasphemy;" all but necessitating and forcing them to deliver the sentence. What then say they? "He is guilty of death;" that having taken Him as condemned, they should thus work upon Pilate thereupon to pass sentence. In which matter those others also being accomplices say, "He is guilty of death;" themselves accusing, themselves judging, themselves passing sentence, themselves being everything then.
But wherefore did they not bring forward the Sabbaths? Because He had often stopped their mouths; and moreover they wanted to take Him, and condemn Him by the things then said. And the high priest anticipated them, and gave the sentence as from them, and drew them all on by rending his vestments, and having led Him away as now condemned unto Pilate, thus did all.
When the Chief Priests were thus assembled, this conventicle of ruffians sought to give their conspiracy the character of a legal trial. But it was entirely a scene of confusion and uproar, as what follows shows, Though many false witnesses came, yet found they none.
Why did they not bring forward now His breaking the Sabbath? Because He had so often confuted them on this point.
He said this with a design to draw from Him some indefensible answer which might be made a snare for Him. But Jesus held his peace, for defence had availed nothing when none would listen to it. For here was only a mockery of justice, it was in truth nothing more than the anarchy of a den of robbers.
This He did to give weight to the accusation, and to confirm by deeds what He taught in words.
Then, after rending his garment, he did not give sentence of himself, but asked of others, saying, What think ye? As was always done in undeniable cases of sin, and manifest blasphemy, and as by force driving them to a certain opinion, he anticipates the answer, What need we any further witnesses? Behold, now ye have heard his blasphemy. What was this blasphemy? For before He had interpreted to them as they were gathered together that text, The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, (Matt. 22:44.) and they had held their peace, and had not contradicted Him. How then do they call what He now says blasphemy? They answered and said, He is guilty of death, the same persons at once accusers, examiners, and sentencers.
(Hom. lxxxv.) As hunters who have started their game, so they exhibit a wild and drunken exultation.
Observe how circumstantially the Evangelist recounts all those particulars even which seem most disgraceful, hiding or extenuating nothing, but thinking it the highest glory that the Lord of the earth should endure such things for us. This let us read continually, let us imprint in our minds, and in these things let us boast.
(Verse 68.) But others slapped his face and said: Prophesy to us, Christ, who is it that struck you? It would have been foolish to respond to those who were beating him and to prophesy about the one who was striking him, since it would seem like madness to openly predict someone who was already striking. But just as he did not prophesy this to you, so he prophesied very clearly that Jerusalem would be surrounded by an army and not a single stone would be left upon another in the temple.
He went in, either out of the attachment of a disciple, or natural curiosity, seeking to know what sentence the High Priest would pass, whether death, or scourging.
At last came two false witnesses. How are they false witnesses, when they repeat only what we read that the Lord spoke? A false witness is one who takes what is said in a different sense from that in which it was said. Now this the Lord had spoken of the temple of His Body, and they cavil at His expressions, and by a slight change and addition produce a plausible charge. The Lord's words were, Destroy this temple; (John 2:19.) this they make into, I can destroy the Temple of God. He said, Destroy, not 'I will destroy,' because it is unlawful to lay hands on ourselves. Also they phrased it, And build it again, making it apply to the temple of the Jews; but the Lord had said, And I will raise it up again, thus clearly pointing out a living and breathing temple. For to build again, and to raise again, are two different things.
Headlong and uncontrolled rage, unable to find even a false accusation, moves the High Priest from his throne, the motion of his body showing the emotion of his mind. And the High Priest arose, and said unto him, Answerest thou nothing to the things which these witness against Thee?
For as God, He knew that whatever He said would be twisted into an accusation against Him. But at this His silence before false witnesses and ungodly Priests, the High Priest was exasperated, and summons Him to answer, that from anything He says he may raise a charge against Him.
The same fury which drew the High Priest from his seat, impels him now to rend his clothes; for so it was customary with the Jews to do whenever they heard any blasphemy, or any thing against God.
And by this rending his garments, he shows that the Jews have lost the priestly glory, and that their High Priest's throne was vacant. For by rending his garment he rent the veil of the Law which covered him.
They spit in his face, and buffeted him, to fulfil the prophecy of Esaias, I gave my cheek to the smiters, and turned not away my face from shame and spitting. (Isa. 50:6.)
But it would have been foolish to have answered them that smote Him, and to have declared the smiter, seeing that in their madness they seem to have struck Him openly.
This is clearly a reflection of the holy prophet’s words, “Be appalled at this, O heavens, and shudder with great fear,” says “the Lord,” the one true God, the king of kings and Lord of lords. He was dishonored by us: first he endured blows, and then he endured laughter from the impious, exemplifying the highest forbearance yet presented to us. How can the one who “examines heart and mind,” the one who illumines prophets, not know “who strikes you”?
When they had condemned Him, then they abused Him and mocked Him, wrapping His face in a cloth, as another evangelist says (Lk. 22:64, Mk. 14:65). They mocked Him in this manner because the people considered Him a prophet. To "buffet" is to strike with the hands with the fingers clenched, or, to put it more plainly, to punch with the fist.
(ord) Prophesy unto us is said in ridicule of His claim to be held as a Prophet by the people.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying Matthew 26:68 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Jesus, having been unjustly condemned by the Sanhedrin, endures profound humiliation and physical abuse from His captors. Blindfolded and struck, He is sarcastically challenged to "prophesy" who hit Him, a cruel mockery of His divine claims and prophetic office, highlighting the depth of their rejection and the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies concerning the suffering Messiah.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is situated immediately after Jesus' interrogation and condemnation by the Jewish high council, the Sanhedrin, in the high priest Caiaphas's courtyard. Following Peter's denial (which occurs shortly after this scene, though the narrative order can vary slightly between Gospels), Jesus has just been declared guilty of blasphemy by Caiaphas and the council (Matthew 26:65-66). The events of Matthew 26:67-68 describe the immediate aftermath of this judicial condemnation, where the guards and servants, emboldened by the council's verdict, begin to physically abuse and mock Jesus. This brutal treatment serves as a prelude to His delivery to Pilate and the Roman trial.
Historical & Cultural Context
The trial of Jesus before the Sanhedrin was a highly irregular and illegal proceeding according to Jewish law, taking place at night and lacking proper legal procedures. The Sanhedrin, the supreme Jewish judicial and legislative body, was composed of 71 members, including the high priest, elders, and scribes. Their authority under Roman occupation was limited, particularly concerning capital punishment, which required Roman approval. The act of spitting and striking was a profound act of contempt and dishonor in ancient Near Eastern culture, designed to humiliate and degrade the victim publicly. Blindfolding someone and then striking them, followed by a challenge to identify the assailant, was a common game of mockery, often played with prisoners or slaves, further emphasizing their view of Jesus as utterly powerless and beneath their dignity.
Key Themes
Matthew 26:68 powerfully contributes to several key themes within Matthew's Gospel and the broader biblical narrative. It underscores the mockery and humiliation of Christ, vividly portraying the indignity and physical abuse Jesus willingly endured, a stark contrast to His divine majesty. This scene also highlights the rejection of divine truth, as the command to "Prophesy unto us, thou Christ" is not a genuine request for a demonstration of His power, but a cynical, sarcastic challenge from those who had already rejected His claims as the Messiah. Furthermore, it serves as a poignant fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy, particularly those concerning the suffering servant, who would be scourged and spit upon and wounded for humanity's transgressions. Finally, Jesus' silent endurance in the face of such injustice, without retaliation, exemplifies His willing submission to God's redemptive plan, as foretold in Isaiah 53:7.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
Meaning "to foretell events, divine, speak under inspiration, exercise the prophetic office." In this context, the challenge to "Prophesy unto us" is deeply ironic and sarcastic. They are not genuinely seeking a divine revelation but are mocking Jesus' claims to be a prophet or the Messiah, daring Him to use His supposed supernatural knowledge to identify His blindfolded tormentors. It underscores their cynical disbelief and contempt for His spiritual authority.
Meaning "anointed, i.e. the Messiah, an epithet of Jesus." The use of this title by His tormentors is a profound instance of dramatic irony. While they use it in a derogatory and mocking manner, denying His true identity, they unwittingly proclaim the very truth of who He is – the Anointed One, the Messiah, whose suffering fulfills divine prophecy. This highlights the blindness of their unbelief even as they utter a title that signifies His true nature.
A primary verb meaning "to hit (as if by a single blow and less violently than τύπτω); specially, to sting (as a scorpion)." This word indicates a direct, physical blow, likely with the hand or fist, emphasizing the personal and humiliating nature of the assault. It's not merely a light tap but a forceful strike, contributing to the physical pain and degradation Jesus endured.
Verse Breakdown
"Saying, Prophesy unto us, thou Christ,"
This clause captures the essence of the verbal abuse. The command "Prophesy unto us" is a direct challenge to Jesus' perceived prophetic claims and divine knowledge. The addition of "thou Christ" is deeply sarcastic, using His messianic title to mock His inability (in their eyes) to use His supposed divine power to discern His attackers while blindfolded. It's a taunt designed to humiliate and discredit Him in the most profound way.
"Who is he that smote thee?"
This is the specific question posed to Jesus, following the physical assault. Having been blindfolded and struck, Jesus is challenged to identify His assailant. The question is not posed out of genuine curiosity but as a cruel game, a further attempt to mock His divine omniscience and expose Him as a fraud if He cannot "prophesy" the identity of the one who hit Him. It highlights their intent to degrade Him both physically and spiritually.
Literary Devices
The passage makes effective use of several literary devices. Irony is prominent, particularly in the use of the title "Christ." His tormentors mockingly call Him "Christ," the Anointed One, while simultaneously denying and abusing the very Messiah standing before them. This dramatic irony underscores their spiritual blindness and the profound truth of Jesus' identity despite their contempt. Foreshadowing is also present, as this scene of mockery and suffering anticipates the greater suffering of the cross, where Jesus will again be mocked and humiliated. The contrast between Jesus' divine power and His willing submission to human abuse is striking, emphasizing His humility and obedience to the Father's will. The physical actions—spitting, striking, blindfolding—are a form of symbolism, representing the world's rejection of God's truth and the profound depths of human depravity.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Matthew 26:68 is a pivotal moment that underscores the profound theological truth of Jesus' willing suffering as the Lamb of God. It reveals the depth of human sin and rebellion against divine authority, as those who should have recognized and honored the Messiah instead subjected Him to the utmost contempt and abuse. Jesus' silent endurance in this moment is not a sign of weakness, but of His resolute commitment to God's redemptive plan, demonstrating perfect obedience and trust even unto death. This scene prefigures the ultimate sacrifice on the cross, where He would bear the full weight of humanity's sin, becoming the object of scorn so that humanity might receive grace and reconciliation.
Reflection and Application
The scene in Matthew 26:68 offers a profound opportunity for reflection on the nature of Christ's sacrifice and our response to suffering. Witnessing Jesus, the Son of God, enduring such demeaning and unjust treatment should humble us and deepen our appreciation for the immense cost of our salvation. His silent endurance serves as a powerful model for believers facing injustice, persecution, or mockery for their faith. Rather than retaliating or seeking vengeance, we are called to trust in God's sovereign plan and to respond with grace, mirroring the patience and love of our Savior. This passage challenges us to examine our own hearts: do we truly acknowledge Jesus as Christ, or do we, in our own ways, mock or reject His authority through our actions and attitudes? It reminds us that true faith often involves enduring hardship and misunderstanding, just as our Lord did.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did Jesus not identify who smote Him, given His divine knowledge?
Jesus' silence in Matthew 26:68 was a deliberate act, not an inability to identify His tormentors. As the Son of God, He possessed omniscience. His silence was a profound demonstration of His willing submission to the Father's redemptive plan, fulfilling prophecy (e.g., Isaiah 53:7) and setting an example of patient endurance in the face of injustice. To have identified His assailants would have engaged in their mocking game and potentially diverted from His ultimate purpose of suffering for the sins of humanity. His silence underscored His sovereignty and His commitment to the path of humility and sacrifice, rather than exercising His divine power for personal vindication.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Matthew 26:68 finds its Christ-centered fulfillment in the profound truth that the suffering, mocked, and humiliated Jesus is indeed the promised Messiah, whose endurance of such indignity was essential for humanity's salvation. The very title "Christ" (Messiah), used in derision by His tormentors, points to His true identity as the Anointed One chosen by God to bear the sins of the world. His willingness to be blindfolded and struck, to be mocked as a false prophet, perfectly aligns with the Old Testament prophecies of a suffering servant who would be despised and rejected by men and bear our griefs and carry our sorrows. This scene prefigures the ultimate act of self-giving love on the cross, where the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, would endure the ultimate humiliation and pain to secure eternal life for all who believe. His silent suffering here is a testament to His perfect obedience, demonstrating the humility of God who became flesh to reconcile humanity to Himself, ultimately triumphing over sin and death through His resurrection, proving He was indeed the Christ, not despite, but through His suffering.