Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And G5037 love G5368 the uppermost rooms G4411 at G1722 feasts G1173, and G2532 the chief seats G4410 in G1722 the synagogues G4864,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
they love the place of honor at banquets and the best seats in the synagogues,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
They love the places of honor at banquets, the chief seats in the synagogues,
Ask
American Standard Version
and love the chief place at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
and love the place of honor at feasts, the best seats in the synagogues,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And loue the chiefe place at feastes, and to haue the chiefe seates in the assemblies,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
they love also the chief couches in the supper, and the chief seats in the synagogues,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Matthew Sites (Jerusalem)
All Matthew Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
The Last Week of Jesus' Life (With Reference Table)
The Last Week of Jesus' Life (With Reference Table) View full PDF
The Last Week of Jesus' Life (Map Only)
The Last Week of Jesus' Life (Map Only) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 23,925 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

In Matthew 23:6, Jesus sharply condemns the scribes and Pharisees, exposing their profound hypocrisy and pride. He highlights their insatiable desire for public recognition and prominent social standing, specifically their love for the most honorable places at banquets and the most visible seats in the synagogues. This verse serves as a piercing indictment of religious leaders who prioritize outward show and human applause over genuine humility and service to God.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Matthew 23 is a pivotal chapter, marking Jesus' final public discourse in Jerusalem before His passion. It is a scathing denunciation, a series of "woes" pronounced against the scribes and Pharisees, the religious elite of His day. This chapter follows Jesus' confrontations with various Jewish leaders in the temple, solidifying His opposition to their corrupt leadership. Verse 6, along with Matthew 23:5, describes how they demonstrate their hypocrisy, setting the stage for the subsequent woes that detail the consequences and nature of their spiritual failings. The entire discourse contrasts their external piety with their internal corruption, culminating in Jesus' lament over Jerusalem's rejection of Him.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Jewish society, seating arrangements at public gatherings, particularly feasts (dinners) and in synagogues, were highly significant indicators of social status, honor, and religious authority. At banquets, guests reclined on couches (triclinium), and the "uppermost rooms" (or chief reclining places) were the most prestigious, reserved for the host and honored guests. Similarly, in synagogues, the "chief seats" were typically located at the front, facing the congregation and near the ark where the Torah scrolls were kept. These positions afforded visibility and implied deference. The desire for such places reflected a deep-seated cultural value placed on public honor and recognition, which the scribes and Pharisees aggressively pursued, believing these positions validated their perceived righteousness and authority.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in Matthew and the broader New Testament. It directly exposes the hypocrisy and pride of religious leaders, demonstrating how their actions were driven by a desire for public acclaim and status, rather than genuine devotion to God or sincere service to others. This highlights the theme of seeking human approval over divine approval, a motivation Jesus consistently critiques (compare Matthew 6:1-6 and John 5:44). Furthermore, it underscores the misuse of authority, contrasting their self-exalting leadership with Jesus' teaching on true spiritual authority, which is characterized by humility and self-sacrificial service, as exemplified in Matthew 20:26-28.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • love (Greek, philéō', G5368): Data, this word denotes a personal attachment, a matter of sentiment or feeling, often translated as "to be a friend to" or "have affection for." In this context, it highlights the Pharisees' deep fondness and strong desire for these positions, indicating their emotional investment in worldly honor rather than spiritual pursuits. It's a love for prestige, not for God or people.
  • uppermost rooms (Greek, prōtoklisía', G4411): Data, this term literally means "a reclining first (in the place of honor) at the dinner-bed." It refers to the most prestigious reclining places at a banquet or feast. This signifies their ambition for social preeminence and the highest status in dining settings, where social hierarchies were visibly expressed.
  • chief seats (Greek, prōtokathedría', G4410): Data, this means "a sitting first (in the front row), i.e., preeminence in council." It refers to the most prominent chairs in the synagogue, often at the front or in a place of honor. This indicates their desire for religious preeminence and public display of authority within the sacred assembly.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And love the uppermost rooms at feasts": This clause reveals the Pharisees' deep-seated desire and affection for the most honorable reclining positions at banquets. In a culture where seating at meals conveyed social status, their active pursuit of these "first places" demonstrated a preoccupation with outward appearance and human recognition rather than genuine humility or hospitality. Their "love" here is not for people or for God, but for the honor derived from their position.
  • "and the chief seats in the synagogues": This second clause extends their prideful ambition to the religious sphere. The "chief seats" in the synagogue were reserved for the most esteemed members, often at the front, providing visibility and signifying spiritual authority. By actively seeking these seats, the Pharisees revealed their desire for public veneration and religious preeminence, using their spiritual roles as a means to gain human applause and elevate their own status within the community.

Literary Devices

Jesus employs several literary devices in this verse to underscore His condemnation. Irony is prominent, as those who claim spiritual leadership and devotion to God are shown to be driven by worldly ambition. Their "love" for these seats stands in stark contrast to the love for God and neighbor commanded by the Law. Symbolism is also at play, with the "uppermost rooms" and "chief seats" serving as potent symbols of worldly power, status, and human recognition, which the Pharisees covet. This pursuit of outward display, as highlighted by these symbolic positions, directly contrasts with Jesus' emphasis on internal righteousness and humble service. The verse also implicitly uses contrast, setting the Pharisees' self-exalting behavior against the true nature of God's kingdom, where the greatest are servants.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Matthew 23:6 is a profound theological statement on the nature of true spiritual leadership and the dangers of religious hypocrisy. It teaches that genuine righteousness is not found in outward displays of piety or the pursuit of human honor, but in an internal disposition of humility and a heart devoted to God and service to others. The Pharisees' actions demonstrate a fundamental misunderstanding of God's kingdom, where status is inverted, and true greatness is measured by servanthood, not by positions of power. This verse challenges believers to constantly examine their motivations, ensuring that their actions stem from a desire to please God rather than to gain human applause or elevate themselves.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Matthew 23:6 remains a timeless warning for all who claim to follow Christ, especially those in positions of leadership within the church or community. It compels us to deeply introspect our motivations: are we seeking recognition, titles, or status from others, or are we genuinely serving God and our neighbor with humility and integrity? In an age that often glorifies visibility and influence, this verse reminds us that true spiritual authority and impact flow from a heart devoted to Christ, willing to take the lowest place, rather than from outward displays or coveted positions. It challenges us to resist the temptation to perform for an audience of people and instead cultivate a heart that seeks only the approval of God. Our actions, whether in public or private, should be driven by love for God and others, not by a desire for personal aggrandizement.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "chief seats" or "uppermost rooms" might I be subtly seeking in my own life, whether in my church, workplace, or social circles?
  • How can I cultivate a heart that genuinely prefers humility and service over public recognition and status?
  • Am I more concerned with how my spiritual actions are perceived by others, or with their authenticity before God?
  • In what ways can I actively demonstrate humility and self-sacrificial service, following Christ's example, rather than seeking personal honor?

FAQ

What was so wrong with wanting the best seats? Weren't they just showing respect for their leaders?

Answer: While respect for leaders is biblical, Jesus' condemnation in Matthew 23:6 was not about the seats themselves, but the motivation behind seeking them. The scribes and Pharisees actively loved and pursued these positions, not out of a desire to serve or to be accessible, but out of a craving for public honor, prestige, and deference. Jesus highlights their hypocrisy: their outward show of piety was a means to gain human applause and elevate themselves, rather than a genuine expression of devotion to God. Their actions revealed a heart focused on self-exaltation, which is contrary to the humility God desires from His people, especially His leaders.

How does this verse relate to leadership in the church today?

Answer: This verse serves as a crucial warning for all leaders, particularly within the church. It underscores that true spiritual leadership is characterized by humility, service, and a focus on God's glory, not by the pursuit of titles, positions, or public acclaim. Leaders should not "lord it over" others but rather be servants of all, just as Jesus taught in Matthew 20:26-28. The temptation to seek prominence, control, or the honor of men remains a significant danger. This verse calls church leaders to examine their hearts, ensuring their ministry flows from genuine love for Christ and His people, rather than from a desire for personal status or recognition.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Matthew 23:6, with its stark portrayal of the Pharisees' pride and self-exaltation, finds its profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the absolute humility and self-emptying service of Jesus Himself. While the Pharisees craved the "uppermost rooms" and "chief seats," Jesus, though God incarnate, "made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant" (Philippians 2:7). He did not seek honor from men; rather, He taught His disciples that "whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant" (Matthew 20:26). His life was a living antithesis to the Pharisees' ambition. He came not to be served, but to serve, and to give His life as a ransom for many (Matthew 20:28). The ultimate expression of His humility was His willingness to endure the cross, despising its shame, for the joy set before Him (Hebrews 12:2). He is the true King who humbly rode on a donkey (Matthew 21:5), the Lord who washed His disciples' feet (John 13:1-17), and the "Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!" (John 1:29). In every aspect, Jesus demonstrated the divine principle that true greatness and honor come through humble service and self-sacrifice, not through the pursuit of worldly status or the applause of men.

Copy as
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers . Public domain.
Copy as
Origen of AlexandriaAD 253
COMMENTARY ON MATTHEW 12
What are we to say about those who “love the places of honor at banquets and the front seats in synagogues and the highest respect in public places and to be called rabbi by everyone”? We must first admit that this kind of delight is found not only among the scribes and Pharisees but also in the church of Christ, and not only at dinner, while taking places at the table, but also the front seats in church. These are the deacons, or those who wish to become deacons, yet who “squander the savings of widows, praying for a good opportunity” and yet “will receive a greater judgment.” They covet even more avidly the highly visible “first seats” of those called priests. Indeed, however, even they do not put as much effort into their scheming as those who are called bishops, the ones who love “being called rabbi by men.” It is they who ought most clearly to understand that a bishop is to be “above reproach” and so on, so that he would be called “bishop” not by men [only] but rather before God.
Hilary of Poitiers (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 367
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
And that the disciples may ever remember that they are the children of one parent, and that by their new birth they have passed the limits of their earthly origin.
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on the Gospel of Matthew 72
But they not in these only, but in other little things, suffered from this disease.

For, "they love," He saith, "the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues, and greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi." For these things, although one may think them small, yet are they a cause of great evils. These things have overthrown both cities and churches.

And it comes upon me now even to weep, when I hear of the first seats, and the greetings, and consider how many ills were hence engendered to the churches of God, which it is not necessary to publish to you now; nay rather as many as are aged men do not even need to learn these things from us.

But mark thou, I pray thee, how vainglory prevailed; when they were commanded not to be vainglorious, even in the synagogues, where they had entered to discipline others.

For to have this feeling at feasts, to howsoever great a degree, doth not seem to be so dreadful a thing; although even there the teachers ought to be held in reverence, and not in the church only, but everywhere. And like as a man, wherever he may appear, is manifestly distinguished from the brutes; so also ought the teacher, both speaking and holding his peace, and dining, and doing whatever it may be, to be distinguished as well by his gait, as by his look, and by his garb, and by all things generally. But they were on every account objects of ridicule, and in every respect disgraced themselves, making it their study to follow what they ought to flee. For they love them, it is said; but if the loving them be a matter of blame, what a thing must the doing them be; and to hunt and strive after them, how great an evil.
John Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 407
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
The Lord had charged the Scribes and Pharisees with harshness and neglect; He now brings forward their vain-glory, which made them depart from God.

Note the intensive force of the words of His reproofs. He says not merely that they do their works to be seen of men, but added, all their works. And not only in great things but in some things trivial they were vainglorious, They make broad their phylacteries and enlarge the borders of their garments.

Observe where vain glory governed them, to wit, in the synagogues, whither they entered to guide others. It had been tolerable to have felt thus at feasts, notwithstanding that a doctor ought to be had in honour in all places alike, and not in the Churches only. But if it be blameworthy to love such things, how wrong is it to seek to attain them?

Or otherwise; Of the foregoing things with which He had charged the Pharisees, He now passes over many as of no weight, and such as His disciples needed not to be instructed in; but that which was the cause of all evils, namely, ambition of the master's seat, that He insists upon to instruct His disciples.

Not that when Christ is here said to be our Master, the Father is excluded, as neither when God is said to be our Father, is Christ excluded, Who is the Father of men.

Not only does the Lord forbid us to seek supremacy, but would lead His hearer to the very opposite; He that is greatest among you shall be your servant.
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Matthew
(Verse 6.) For they enlarge their phylacteries and magnify their fringes. They love the places of honor at banquets, the chief seats in the synagogues, greetings in the marketplaces, and to be called Rabbi by men. Woe to us, miserable ones, to whom the vices of the Pharisees have been passed on. When the Lord gave the commandments of the Law through Moses, He added at the end: Bind them upon your hand, and they shall be before your eyes (Deut. VI, 8). And the meaning is: Let my precepts be in your hand, so that they may be fulfilled in action: let them be before your eyes, so that day and night you may meditate on them. The Pharisees, by misinterpreting this, wrote the Ten Commandments of Moses on scrolls, folding them up and binding them on their foreheads, making them like a crown on their heads so that they would always be before their eyes. This is still done today by the Indians, Persians, and Babylonians, and those who do this are considered religious among the people. Moses also commanded (Num. XV) that the Israelite people should make blue tassels on the corners of their garments, to distinguish them as the chosen people, just as circumcision is a sign for the Jewish people's bodies, so their clothing should have some distinction. Superstitious teachers, seeking popular applause, and pursuing gains from women, made large phylacteries and bound the sharpest thorns in them so that, as they walked or sat, they would be punctured and, as it were, be drawn by this admonition to the duties of the Lord and to the ministries of his service. Therefore, because the Lord had said that they do all their works to be seen by men, which he had accused in general, he now divides them into parts. Those little tablets of the Decalogue were called phylacteries, which whoever had them would have as a safeguard and a reminder of themselves: the Pharisees not understanding that these things should be carried in the heart, not on the body; otherwise, even cabinets and chests have books, but do not have knowledge of God. This is done among us by superstitious women, in little Gospels, and in the wood of the cross, and in similar things (which indeed they have zeal for God, but not according to knowledge). (Romans 10) Even today, they strain out a gnat and swallow a camel (Below, in the same place). Such was the fringe, small and short, from the Law and the precepts, which was touched by the woman who was flowing with blood, in the cloak of the Lord (Luke 8, above). But she was not moved by the superstitious thorns of the Pharisees; rather, she was healed by touching it. And when they excessively enlarge their phylacteries and make large fringes, seeking glory from men, they are accused in the rest, why they seek the first places at dinners, and the first seats in synagogues; and in public they cut throats and glory; and they are called Rabbi by men, which is said in Latin language, teacher. Denique sequitur:
Jerome (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 420
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
For the Lord, when He had given the commandments of the Law through Moses, added at the end, And thou shalt bind them for a sign upon thine hand, and they shall be ever before thine eyes; (Deut. 6:8.) the meaning of which is, Let my precepts be in thine hand so as to be fulfilled in thy works; let them be before thine eyes so as that thou shalt meditate upon them day and night. This the Pharisees misinterpreting, wrote on parchments the Decalogue of Moses, that is, the Ten Commandments, and folding them up, tied them on their forehead, so making them a crown for their head, that they should be always before their eyes. Moses had in another place given command that they should make fringes of blue in the borders of their garments, to distinguish the people of Israel (Numb. 15:39.); that as in their bodies circumcision, so in their garments the fringe, might discriminate the Jewish nation. But these superstitious teachers, catching at popular favour, and making gain of silly women, made broad hems, and fastened them with sharp pins, that as they walked or sat they might be pricked, and by such monitors be recalled to the duties of God's ministry. This embroidery then of the Decalogue they called phylacteries, that is, conservatories, because those who wore them, wore them for their own protection and security. So little did the Pharisees understand that they were to be worn on the heart and not on the body; for in equal degree may cases and chests be said to have books, which assuredly have not the knowledge of God.

Seeing they thus make broad their phylacteries, and make them broad fringes, desiring to have glory of men, they are convicted also in other things; For they love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues.

(cont. Helvid. 15.) All men may be called brethren in affection, which is of two kinds, general and particular. Particular, by which all Christians are brethren; general, by which all men being born of one Father are bound together by like tie of kindred.

It is a difficulty that the Apostle against this command calls himself the teacher of the Gentiles; and that in monasteries in their common conversation, they call one another, Father. It is to be cleared thus. It is one thing to be father or master by nature, another by sufferance. Thus when we call any man our father, we do it to show respect to his age, not as regarding him as the author of our being. We also call men 'Master,' from resemblance to a real master; and, not to use tedious repetition, as the One God and One Son, who are by nature, do not preclude us from calling others gods and sons by adoption, so the One Father and One Master, do not preclude us from speaking of other fathers and masters by an abuse of the terms.
Desert FathersAD 500
The Desert Fathers, Sayings of the Early Christian Monks
Three brothers once came to a hermit in Scetis. One of them said to him, ‘Abba, I have memorized the Old and New Testaments.’ But the hermit answered, ‘And you have filled the air with words.’ The second said to him, ‘I have written out the Old and New Testaments with my own hand.’ But the hermit said, ‘And you have filled the window-ledge with manuscripts.’ The third said, ‘The grass is growing up my chimney.’ But the hermit answered, ‘And you have driven away hospitality.’
Pseudo-Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 500
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Such also are they who lay a heavy burden upon those who come to penitence, so that while men would avoid present punishment, they overlook that which is to come. For if you lay upon a boy's shoulders a burden more than he can bear, he must needs cither cast it off, or be broken down by it; so the man on whom you lay too grievous a burden of penance must either wholly refuse it, or if he submit himself to it will find himself unable to bear it, and so be offended, and sin worse. Also, if we should be wrong in imposing too light a penance, is it not better to have to answer for mercy than for severity? Where the master of the household is liberal, the steward should not be oppressive. If God be kind, should His Priest be harsh? Do you seek thereby the character of sanctity? Be strict in ordering your own life, in that of others lenient; let men hear of you as enjoining little, and performing much. The Priest who gives licence to himself, and exacts the utmost from others, is like a corrupt tax-gatherer in the state, who to ease himself taxes others heavily.

Every substance breeds in itself that which destroys it, as wood the worm, and garments the moth; so the Devil strives to corrupt the ministry of the Priests, who are ordained for the edification of holiness, endeavouring that this good, while it is done to be seen of men, should be turned into evil. Take away this fault from the clergy, and you will have no further labour in their reform, for of this it comes that a clergyman who has sinned can hardly perform penance. Also the Lord here points out the cause why they could not believe in Christ, because nearly all they did was in order to be seen of men; for he whose desire is for earthly glory from men, cannot believe on Christ who preaches things heavenly. I have read one who interprets this place thus. In Moses' seat, that is, in the rank and degree instituted by Moses, the Scribes and Pharisees are seated unworthily, forasmuch as they preached to others the Law which foretold Christ's coming, but themselves did not receive Him when come. For this cause He exhorts the people to hear the Law which they preached, that is, to believe in Christ who was preached by the Law, but not to follow the Scribes and Pharisees in their disbelief of Him. And He shows the reason why they preached the coming of Christ out of the Law, yet did not believe on Him; namely, because they did not preach that Christ should come through any desire of His coming, but that they might be seen by men to be doctors of the Law.

But after their example do many invent Hebrew names of Angels, and write them, and bind them on themselves, and they seem dreadful to such as are without understanding. Others again wear round their neck a portion of the Gospel written out. But is not the Gospel read every day in the Church, and heard by all? Those therefore who receive no profit from the Gospel sounded in their ears, how shall the having them hung about their neck save them? Further, wherein is the virtue of the Gospel? in the shape of its letters, or in the understanding its meaning? If in the characters, you do well to hang them round your neck; if in their meaning, they are of more profit when laid up in the heart, than hung round the neck. But others explain this place thus, That they made broad their teachings concerning special observances, as phylacteries, or preservatives of salvation, preaching them continually to the people. And the broad fringes of their garments they explain of the same undue stress upon such commandments.

For He rebukes not those who recline in the highest place, but those who love such places, blaming the will not the deed. For to no purpose does he humble himself in place who exalts himself in heart. For some vain men hearing that it was a commendable thing to seat himself in the lowest place, chooses so to do; and thus not only does not put away the vanity of his heart, but adds this additional vain ostentation of his humility, as one who would be thought righteous and humble. For many proud men take the lowest place in their bodies, but in haughtiness of heart think themselves to be seated among the highest; and there are many humble men who, placed among the highest, are inwardly in their own esteem among the lowest.

They love the first salutations, first, that is, not in time only, before others; but in tone, that we should say with a loud voice, Hail, Rabbi; and in body that we should bow low our head; and in place, that the salutation should be in public.

That is, they wish to be called, not to be such; they desire the name, and neglect the duties.

Be not ye called Rabbi, that ye take not to yourselves what belongs to God. And call not others Rabbi, that ye pay not to men a divine honour. For One is the Master of all, who instructs all men by nature. For if man were taught by man, all men would learn that have teachers; but seeing it is not man that teaches, but God, many are taught, but few learn. Man cannot by teaching impart an understanding to man, but that understanding which is given by God man calls forth

And call no man your Father upon earth; because in this world though man begets man, yet there is one Father who created all men. For we have not beginning of life from our parents, but we have our life transmitted through them.a
Remigius of Rheims (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 533
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Which means that every one who thinks highly of his own deserts, shall be humbled before God; and every one who humbles himself concerning his good deeds, shall be exalted with God.
Rabanus Maurus (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 856
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
It should be noted, that He does not forbid those to whom this belongs by right of rank to be saluted in the forum, or to sit or recline in the highest room; but those who unduly desire these things, whether they obtain them or not, these He enjoins the believers to shun as wicked.

And herein they are not without fault, that the same men should be concerned in the litigations of the forum, who in the synagogue in Moses' seat, seek to be called Rabbi by men.
Glossa Ordinaria (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1274
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(non occ.) Because it was clear who was the Father of all, by this which was said, Which art in Heaven, He would teach them who was the Master of all, and therefore repeats the same command concerning a master, Neither be ye called masters; for one is your Master, even Christ.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Matthew 23:6 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.