Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And he sware unto her, Whatsoever thou shalt ask of me, I will give it thee, unto the half of my kingdom.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And G2532 he sware G3660 unto her G846, Whatsoever G3754 G3739 G1437 thou shalt ask G154 of me G3165, I will give G1325 it thee G4671, unto G2193 the half G2255 of my G3450 kingdom G932.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
and he made a vow to her, "Whatever you ask me, I will give you, up to half my kingdom."
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
And he swore to her, “Whatever you ask of me, I will give you, up to half my kingdom!”
Ask
American Standard Version
And he sware unto her, Whatsoever thou shalt ask of me, I will give it thee, unto the half of my kingdom.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
He swore to her, “Whatever you shall ask of me, I will give you, up to half of my kingdom.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And he sware vnto her, Whatsoeuer thou shalt aske of me, I will giue it thee, euen vnto the halfe of my kingdome.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and he sware to her--`Whatever thou mayest ask me, I will give to thee--unto the half of my kingdom.'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Mark Sites (Jerusalem)
All Mark Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
Mark 6:14-28
Mark 6:14-28 View full PDF
All Mark Sites (Levant)
All Mark Sites (Levant) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 24,431 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Mark 6:23 captures the pivotal, rash, and ultimately tragic oath made by Herod Antipas to Salome, the daughter of Herodias, during his birthday celebration. In a moment of drunken revelry and a desire to impress his guests, Herod pledges to grant Salome "whatsoever thou shalt ask of me, unto the half of my kingdom," an extravagant and ill-considered promise that sets in motion the events leading to the unjust execution of John the Baptist. This verse encapsulates Herod's moral weakness and sets the stage for a profound act of injustice driven by malice and a king's foolish pride.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Mark 6:23 is situated within the broader narrative of John the Baptist's imprisonment and martyrdom, a significant interlude in Mark's account of Jesus's ministry. Immediately preceding this verse, the narrative details Herod's conflicted relationship with John: he feared John, knew him to be a righteous and holy man, and even enjoyed listening to him, yet he had imprisoned him due to John's condemnation of Herod's unlawful marriage to Herodias, his brother Philip's wife (Mark 6:17-20). The verse itself follows Salome's captivating dance, which so pleased Herod and his dinner guests that he felt compelled to make a public, extravagant vow. This promise, made in the presence of his officials and leading men of Galilee (Mark 6:21), creates an inescapable trap for Herod, leading directly to Herodias's vengeful demand for John's head and Herod's reluctant but ultimately compliant execution of the prophet (Mark 6:24-28).
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Herod Antipas, a tetrarch appointed by Rome, ruled over Galilee and Perea. His marriage to Herodias was a scandalous affair, as she was his brother Philip's wife, a union explicitly forbidden by Jewish law (Leviticus 18:16). John the Baptist's public condemnation of this marriage was a bold act of prophetic witness, challenging the moral authority of the ruling elite. Oaths in the ancient Near East, especially those made by rulers in public, carried immense weight and were considered binding, often invoking divine witness. For a king to renege on such a promise would result in a severe loss of face, honor, and perceived legitimacy. Herod's desire to uphold his public image and the solemnity of his oath, even when faced with a morally repugnant request, underscores the cultural pressure and the personal weakness that led to John's death. The "half of my kingdom" was a hyperbolic expression, signifying an almost limitless offer within his domain, akin to a king offering "anything" to a favored subject.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several key themes within the Gospel of Mark and broader biblical theology. Firstly, it highlights the danger of rash and ill-considered vows, demonstrating how impulsive promises, especially when made under social pressure or compromised judgment, can lead to catastrophic and irreversible consequences. Herod's oath, though seemingly generous, becomes a noose around his own conscience. Secondly, it exposes moral compromise and the corrupting influence of power. Despite Herod's internal conflict and his recognition of John's righteousness (Mark 6:20), his concern for his reputation and the perceived inviolability of his oath ultimately superseded his moral compass and sense of justice. This reveals a ruler more concerned with appearances than with righteousness, a theme echoed in other biblical accounts of corrupt leadership. Finally, the verse underscores the destructive power of malice and manipulation. Herodias's deep-seated hatred for John, fueled by his public rebuke of her illicit marriage, drives her to exploit Herod's rash promise through her daughter, demonstrating how personal vendettas can lead to extreme cruelty and injustice, even against a prophet of God.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • sware (Greek, omnȳō', G3660): This verb means "to swear, i.e. take (or declare on) oath." Its use here emphasizes the solemn and binding nature of Herod's declaration. In the ancient world, an oath was a serious commitment, often made with an appeal to divine authority, making it extremely difficult for Herod to retract without losing face or inviting perceived divine judgment. This highlights the gravity of his promise.
  • ask (Greek, aitéō', G154): This word means "to ask (in genitive case)." It denotes a request or demand. The use of this word underscores the agency given to Salome to determine the content of the promise. Herod's offer is not merely a gift but a response to whatever specific request she might formulate, placing the burden of the choice, and its potential consequences, directly on her and, by extension, Herodias.
  • give (Greek, dídōmi', G1325): This verb means "to give (used in a very wide application, properly, or by implication, literally or figuratively; greatly modified by the connection)." In this context, it signifies Herod's commitment to bestow, grant, or deliver whatever is requested. The breadth of its meaning in the Greek lexicon reinforces the boundless nature of Herod's promise, indicating his willingness to surrender almost anything within his power, even to the detriment of his own moral standing.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And he sware unto her": This opening clause establishes the solemnity and binding nature of Herod's declaration. The act of swearing an oath was a profound commitment in the ancient world, often invoking divine witness. Herod's oath to Salome, made publicly, traps him in a promise that he will find difficult, if not impossible, to retract without significant loss of honor and political standing.
  • "Whatsoever thou shalt ask of me": This phrase reveals the limitless scope of Herod's offer. He places no conditions or boundaries on the request, granting Salome complete freedom to name her desire. This open-ended promise, made impulsively, is the critical hinge upon which the tragic events turn, demonstrating Herod's recklessness and lack of foresight.
  • "I will give [it] thee": This reinforces Herod's firm commitment to fulfill his oath. It is a direct, personal pledge of action, emphasizing his resolve, however misguided, to honor his word. The implied "it" refers to whatever Salome chooses to ask for, reiterating the blank check he has offered her.
  • "unto the half of my kingdom": This hyperbolic expression signifies the extreme generosity and vastness of Herod's promise. It is not meant literally to divide his territory but to convey that he would give almost anything within his power and dominion. This phrase underscores the extravagance of his oath and the depth of his desire to impress his guests and fulfill his word, even if it meant sacrificing a significant portion of his wealth or authority.

Literary Devices

Mark 6:23 is rich with Hyperbole, as Herod's promise to give "unto the half of my kingdom" is an exaggerated statement not meant to be taken literally, but rather to convey the extreme extent of his generosity and the boundless nature of his offer. This dramatic overstatement highlights his impulsiveness and the potentially ruinous nature of his vow. The verse also employs Dramatic Irony, as the audience, knowing the tragic outcome of John the Baptist's death, understands the terrible implications of Herod's seemingly magnanimous promise in a way that Herod himself does not fully grasp at the moment of utterance. This creates tension and foreshadows the impending injustice. Furthermore, there is an element of Foreshadowing, as this rash oath directly sets the stage for the fulfillment of Herodias's malicious desire and the subsequent execution of John, making the promise itself a dark harbinger of the violence to come.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Mark 6:23 serves as a stark biblical warning against the dangers of making rash promises and the moral compromises that can arise from a desire for human approval over divine righteousness. Herod's oath, born of pride and intoxication, entraps him, illustrating how the pursuit of worldly honor can lead to grave injustice. The narrative underscores the immense value of human life and the sanctity of truth, both of which are tragically violated in the subsequent events. It also highlights the contrast between earthly kings, whose power is limited and often wielded imperfectly or unjustly, and the ultimate sovereignty of God, whose promises are always true and whose justice is perfect. The story implicitly calls believers to integrity in their speech and to prioritize moral courage over social expediency, even when faced with difficult choices.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Mark 6:23 offers profound lessons for contemporary believers, urging us to cultivate wisdom and integrity in our words and actions. Herod's tragic mistake reminds us that words carry immense power, especially promises and oaths, and that impulsive commitments can lead to unforeseen and devastating consequences. We are called to be people of our word, but also to be thoughtful and discerning before making pledges, recognizing that "death and life are in the power of the tongue" (Proverbs 18:21). Furthermore, Herod's choice to uphold a foolish oath and save face rather than do what was morally right challenges us to examine our own priorities. Are we willing to stand for truth and justice, even when it is unpopular, costly, or threatens our reputation? The narrative compels us to prioritize righteousness and a clear conscience over social approval or the avoidance of discomfort. Finally, the manipulation by Herodias serves as a cautionary tale, encouraging us to develop spiritual discernment to recognize and resist schemes that tempt us toward sin or compromise our convictions, always seeking to align our will with God's.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of your life might you be tempted to make rash promises or commitments, perhaps under pressure or emotion?
  • How can you cultivate greater integrity and thoughtfulness in your speech, ensuring your "yes" means yes and your "no" means no?
  • When have you faced a choice between upholding your reputation or doing what you know is morally right, and what did you learn from that experience?
  • How can you develop greater spiritual discernment to recognize and resist manipulative influences in your life?

FAQ

Why did Herod make such an extravagant promise to Salome?

Answer: Herod's promise was likely a combination of factors: the celebratory atmosphere of his birthday feast, the influence of alcohol, and a desire to impress his guests and show off his generosity and power. Salome's dance had greatly pleased him and his company, and in that moment of heightened emotion and public display, he made an impulsive and hyperbolic vow, perhaps not fully considering the potential implications or the malicious intent of Herodias. It was a classic example of a ruler's pride leading to a foolish commitment.

What is the significance of "unto the half of my kingdom"?

Answer: The phrase "unto the half of my kingdom" (Mark 6:23) is a hyperbolic expression, not meant to be taken literally as a partition of his territory. Instead, it signifies the extreme generosity and vastness of Herod's promise, conveying that he would give almost anything within his power and dominion. It underscores the boundless nature of his offer, highlighting his recklessness and the immense pressure he placed upon himself to fulfill such a grand public declaration, regardless of the consequences.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The tragic narrative of Mark 6:23 and its aftermath stands in stark contrast to the perfect kingship and unwavering integrity of Jesus Christ. Herod, an earthly king, makes a rash, self-serving promise that leads to the unjust murder of a righteous man, driven by human weakness, pride, and fear of losing face. His kingdom is one of earthly power, susceptible to corruption and manipulation. In contrast, Jesus, the true King, operates not by impulsive oaths but by divine will and perfect wisdom. His promises are not born of human weakness but of divine faithfulness, always leading to life and redemption, not death. While Herod offers "half of his kingdom" for a fleeting pleasure, Christ offers His very life as a sacrifice for the sins of the world (John 1:29), establishing a spiritual kingdom that is eternal and incorruptible (Colossians 1:13). Unlike Herod, who succumbs to the demands of a vengeful woman, Jesus willingly gives Himself, fulfilling the Father's perfect plan (Philippians 2:8). The ultimate fulfillment of all righteous promises is found in Christ, who is the "Amen, the faithful and true witness" (Revelation 3:14), and whose kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36), but offers eternal life to all who believe.

Copy as

Commentary on Mark 6 verses 14–29

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Here is, I. The wild notions that the people had concerning our Lord Jesus, Mar 6:15. His own countrymen could believe nothing great concerning him, because they knew his poor kindred; but others that were not under the power of that prejudice against him, were yet willing to believe any thing rather than the truth - that he was the Son of God, and the true Messias: they said, He is Elias, whom they expected; or, He is a prophet, one of the Old Testament prophets raised to life, and returned to this world; or as one of the prophets, a prophet now newly raised up, equal to those under the Old Testament.

II. The opinion of Herod concerning him. He heard of his name and fame, of what he said and what he did; and he said, "It is certainly John Baptist, Mar 6:14. As sure as we are here, It is John, whom I beheaded, Mar 6:16. He is risen from the dead; and though while he was with us he did no miracle, yet, having removed for awhile to another world, he is come again with greater power, and now mighty works do show forth themselves in him."

Note, 1. Where there is an idle faith, there is commonly a working fancy. The people said, It is a prophet risen from the dead; Herod said, It is John Baptist risen from the dead. It seems by this, that the rising of a prophet from the dead, to do mighty works, was a thing expected, and was thought neither impossible nor improbable, and it was now readily suspected when it was not true; but afterward, when it was true concerning Christ, and a truth undeniably evidenced, yet then it was obstinately gainsaid and denied. Those who most wilfully disbelieve the truth, are commonly most credulous of errors and fancies.

2.They who fight against the cause of God, will find themselves baffled, even when they think themselves conquerors; they cannot gain their point, for the word of the Lord endures for ever. They who rejoiced when the witnesses were slain, fretted as much, when in three or four days they rose again in their successors, Rev 11:10, Rev 11:11. The impenitent unreformed sinner, that escapeth the sword of Jehu, shall Elisha slay.

3.A guilty conscience needs no accuser or tormentor but itself. Herod charges himself with the murder of John, which perhaps no one else dare charge him with; I beheaded him; and the terror of it made him imagine that Christ was John risen. He feared John while he lived, and now, when he thought he had got clear of him, fears him ten times worse when he is dead. One might as well be haunted with ghosts and furies, as with the horrors of an accusing conscience; those therefore who would keep an undisturbed peace, must keep an undefiled conscience, Act 24:16.

4.There may be the terrors of strong conviction, where there is not the truth of a saving conversion. This Herod, who had this notion concerning Christ, afterward sought to kill him (Luk 13:31), and did set him at nought (Luk 23:11); so that he will not be persuaded, though it be by one risen from the dead; no, not by a John the Baptist risen from the dead.

III. A narrative of Herod's putting John Baptist to death, which is brought in upon this occasion, as it was in Matthew. And here we may observe,

1.The great value and veneration which Herod had some time had for John Baptist, which is related only by this evangelist, Mar 6:20. Here we see what a great way a man may go toward grace and glory, and yet come short of both, and perish eternally.

(1.)He feared John, knowing that he was a just man, and a holy. It is possible that a man may have a great reverence for good men, and especially for good ministers, yea, and for that in them that is good, and yet himself be a bad man. Observe, [1.] John was a just man, and a holy; to make a complete good man, both justice and holiness are necessary; holiness toward God, and justice toward men. John was mortified to this world, and so was a good friend both to justice and holiness. [2.] Herod knew this, not only by common fame, but by personal acquaintance with him. Those that have but little justice and holiness themselves, may yet discern it with respect in others. And, [3.] He therefore feared him, he honoured him. Holiness and justice command veneration, and many that are not good themselves, have respect for those that are.

(2.)He observed him; he sheltered him from the malice of his enemies (so some understand it); or, rather, he had a regard to his exemplary conversation, and took notice of that in him that was praiseworthy, and commended it in the hearing of those about him; he made it appear that he observed what John said and did.

(3.)He heard him preach; which was great condescension, considering how mean John's appearance was. To hear Christ himself preach in our streets will be but a poor plea in the great day, Luk 13:26.

(4.)He did many of those things which John in his preaching taught him. He was not only a hearer of the word, but in part a doer of the work. Some sins which John in his preaching reproved, he forsook, and some duties he bound himself to; but it will not suffice to do many things, unless we have respect to all the commandments.

(5.)He heard him gladly. He did not hear him with terror as Felix heard Paul, but heard him with pleasure. There is a flashy joy, which a hypocrite may have in hearing the word; Ezekiel was to his hearers as a lovely song (Eze 33:32); and the stony ground received the word with joy, Luk 8:13.

2.John's faithfulness to Herod, in telling him of his faults. Herod had married his brother Philip's wife, Mar 6:17. All the country, no doubt, cried shame on him for it, and reproached him for it; but John reproved him, told him plainly, It is not lawful for thee to have thy brother's wife. This was Herod's own iniquity, which he could not leave, when he did many things that John taught him; and therefore John tells him of this particularly. Though he were a king, he would not spare him, any more than Elijah did Ahab, when he said, Hast thou killed and also taken possession? Though John had an interest in him, and he might fear this plain-dealing would destroy his interest, yet he reproved him; for faithful are the wounds of a friend (Pro 27:6); and though there are some swine that will turn again, and rend those that cast pearls before them, yet, ordinarily, he that rebuketh a man (if the person reproved has any thing of the understanding of a man), afterwards shall find more favour than he that flattereth with his tongue, Pro 28:23. Though it was dangerous to offend Herod, and much more to offend Herodias, yet John would run the hazard rather than be wanting in his duty. Note, Those ministers that would be found faithful in the work of God, must not be afraid of the face of man. If we seek to please men, further than is for their spiritual good, we are not the servants of Christ.

3.The malice which Herodias bore to John for this (Mar 6:19); She had a quarrel with him, and would have killed him; but when she could not obtain that, she got him committed to prison, Mar 6:17. Herod respected him, till he touched him in his Herodias. Many that pretend to honour prophesying, are for smooth things only, and love good preaching, if it keep far enough from their beloved sin; but if that be touched, they cannot bear it. No marvel if the world hate those who testify of it that its works are evil. But it is better that sinners persecute ministers now for their faithfulness, than curse them eternally for their unfaithfulness.

4.The plot laid to take off John's head. I am apt to think that Herod was himself in the plot, notwithstanding his pretences to be displeased and surprised, and that the thing was concerted between him and Herodias; for it is said to be when a convenient day was come (Mar 6:21), fit for such a purpose. (1.) There must be a ball at court, upon the king's birthday, and a supper prepared for his lords, high captains, and chief estates of Galilee. (2.) To grace the solemnity, the daughter of Herodias must dance publicly, and Herod must take on him to be wonderfully charmed with her dancing; and if he be, they that sit with him cannot but, in compliment to him, be so too. (3.) The king hereupon must make her an extravagant promise, to give her whatever she would ask, even to the half of the kingdom; and yet, that, if rightly understood, would not have reached the end designed, for John Baptist's head was worth more than his whole kingdom. This promise is bound with an oath, that no room might be left to fly off from it; He sware unto her, Whatsoever thou shalt ask, I will give. I can scarcely think he would have made such an unlimited promise, but that he knew what she would ask. (4.) She, being instructed by Herodias her mother, asked the head of John Baptist; and she must have it brought her in a charger, as a pretty thing for her to play with (Mar 6:24, Mar 6:25); and there must be no delay, no time lost, she must have it by and by. (5.) Herod granted it, and the execution was done immediately while the company were together, which we can scarcely think the king would have done, if he had not determined the matter before. But he takes on him, [1.] To be very backward to it, and that he would not for all the world have done it, if he had not been surprised into such a promise; The king was exceeding sorry, that is, he seemed to be so, he said he was so, he looked as if he had been so; but it was all sham and grimace, he was really pleased that he had found a pretence to get John out of the way. Qui nescit dissimulare, nescit regnare - The man who cannot dissemble, knows not how to reign. And yet he was not without sorrow for it; he could not do it but with great regret and reluctancy; natural conscience will not suffer men to sin easily; the very commission of it is vexatious; what then will the reflection upon it be? [2.] He takes on him to be very sensible of the obligation of his oath; whereas if the damsel had asked but a fourth part of his kingdom, I doubt not but he would have found out a way to evade his oath. The promise was rashly made, and could not bind him to do an unrighteous thing. Sinful oaths must be repented of, and therefore not performed; for repentance is the undoing of what we have done amiss, as far as is in our power. When Theodosius the emperor was urged by a suitor with a promise, he answered, I said it, but did not promise it if it be unjust. If we may suppose that Herod knew nothing of the design when he made that rash promise, it is probable that he was hurried into the doing of it by those about him, only to carry on the humour; for he did it for their sakes who sat with him, whose company he was proud of, and therefore would do any thing to gratify them. Thus do princes make themselves slave to those whose respect they covet, and both value and secure themselves by. None of Herod's subjects stood in more awe of him than he did of his lords, high captains, and chief estates. The king sent an executioner, a soldier of his guard. Bloody tyrants have executioners ready to obey their most cruel and unrighteous decrees. Thus Saul has a Doeg at hand, to fall upon the priests of the Lord, when his own footmen declined it.

5.The effect of this is, (1.) That Herod's wicked court is all in triumph, because this prophet tormented them; the head is made a present of to the damsel, and by her to her mother, Mar 6:28. (2.) That John Baptist's sacred college is all in tears; the disciples of John little thought of this; but, when they heard of it, they came, and took up the neglected corpse, and laid it in a tomb; where Herod, if he had pleased, might have found it, when he frightened himself with the fancy that John Baptist was risen from the dead.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 14–29. Public domain.
Copy as
Pseudo-Jerome (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Or else, The head of the law, which is Christ, is cut off from his own body, that is, the Jewish people, and is given to a Gentile damsel, that is, the Roman Church, and the damsel gives it to her adulterous mother, that is, to the synagogue, who in the end will believe. The body of John is buried, his head is put in a dish; thus the human Letter is covered over, the Spirit is honoured, and received on the altar.
JosephusAD 100
Antiquities of the Jews - Book XVIII, Chapter 5, Section 2
Now some of the Jews thought that the destruction of Herod's army came from God, and that very justly, as a punishment of what he did against John, that was called the Baptist: for Herod slew him, who was a good man, and commanded the Jews to exercise virtue, both as to righteousness towards one another, and piety towards God, and so to come to baptism; for that the washing [with water] would be acceptable to him, if they made use of it, not in order to the putting away [or the remission] of some sins [only], but for the purification of the body; supposing still that the soul was thoroughly purified beforehand by righteousness. Now when [many] others came in crowds about him, for they were very greatly moved [or pleased] by hearing his words, Herod, who feared lest the great influence John had over the people might put it into his power and inclination to raise a rebellion, (for they seemed ready to do any thing he should advise,) thought it best, by putting him to death, to prevent any mischief he might cause, and not bring himself into difficulties, by sparing a man who might make him repent of it when it would be too late. Accordingly he was sent a prisoner, out of Herod's suspicious temper, to Macherus, the castle I before mentioned, and was there put to death. Now the Jews had an opinion that the destruction of this army was sent as a punishment upon Herod, and a mark of God's displeasure to him.
John ChrysostomAD 407
BAPTISMAL INSTRUCTIONS 10.26-27
So the princess danced and, after the dance, committed another more serious sin. For she persuaded that senseless man to promise with an oath to give her whatever she might ask. Do you see how easily swearing makes one witless? Thus, whatever she asked, he swore to give. What, then, if she were to have asked for your head, Herod? What if she were to have asked for your whole kingdom? Yet he took no thought of these things. The devil had set his trap, making it strong, and from the moment the oath was complete, he both cast his snares and stretched his net on every side. The request was abominable, but she persuaded him, and he gave the order to bridle John’s holy tongue. But even now it continues to speak. For even today in every church, you can hear John still crying aloud through the Gospels and saying: “It is not lawful for you to have the wife of your brother Philip.” He cut off the head, but he did not cut off the voice. He curbed the tongue, but he did not curb the accusation. Do you see what swearing leads to? It cuts off the heads of prophets. You saw the bait. Dread, then, the ruin it brings.
John ChrysostomAD 407
THE GOSPEL OF ST MATTHEW, HOMILY 49
So much did he value his kingdom, such a captive was he to his passion, that he would give it to her for her dancing. And why do you wonder that this happened then, when even now, after so much instruction in sound doctrine, many men give away their soul for the dancing of these effeminate young men with no oath needed? They have been made captives by their pleasure and are led around like sheep wherever the wolf may drag them.
Remigius of Rheims (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 533
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
For his lustful will drove him to lay hands on a man, whom he knew to be just and holy. And by this, we may see how a less fault became the cause to him of a greater; as it is said, (Rev. 22:11) He which is filthy, let him be filthy still. It goes on, And when a convenient day was come, that Herod on his birthday made a supper to his lords, high captains, and chief estates of Galilee.
Gregory the Dialogist (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 604
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(Mor. 3, 7) I cannot, without the greatest wonder, reflect that he, who was filled even in his mother's womb with the spirit of prophecy, and who was the greatest that had arisen amongst those born of women, is sent into prison by wicked men, is beheaded for the dancing of a girl, and though a man of so great austerity, meets death through such a foul instrument. Are we to suppose that there was something evil in his life, to be wiped away by so ignominious a death? When, however, could he commit a sin even in his eating, whose food was only locusts and wild honey? How could he offend in his conversation, who never quitted the wilderness? How is it that Almighty God so despises in this life those whom He has so sublimely chosen before all ages, if it be not for the reason, which is plain to the piety of the faithful, that He thus sinks them into the lowest place, because He sees how He is rewarding them in the highest, and outwardly He throws them down amongst things despised, because inwardly He draws them up even to incomprehensible things. Let each then infer from this what they shall suffer, whom He rejects, if He so grieves those whom he loves.
Bede (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 735
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(ubi sup.) Ancient history relates, that Philip, the son of Herod the great, under whom the Lord fled into Egypt, the brother of this Herod, under whom Christ suffered, married Herodias, the daughter of king Aretas; but afterwards, that his father-in-law, after certain disagreements had arisen with his son-in-law, had taken his daughter away, and, to the grief of her former husband, had given her in marriage to his enemy; therefore John the Baptist rebukes Herod and Herodias for contracting an unlawful union, and because it was not allowed for a man to marry his brother's wife during his lifetime.

(ubi sup.) For Herodias was afraid, lest Herod should repent at some time, or be reconciled to his brother Philip, and so the unlawful marriage be divorced. It goes on, For Herod feared John, knowing that he was a just man, and an holy.

(ubi sup.) The only men whom we read of, as celebrating their birthdays with festive joys are Herod and Pharaoh, but each, with an evil presage, stained his birthday with blood; Herod, however, with so much the greater wickedness, as he slew the holy and guiltless teacher of truth, and that, by the wish, and at the instance of a female dancer. For there follows. And when the daughter of the said Herodias came in, and danced, and pleased Herod and them that sat with him, the king said unto the damsel, Ask of me whatsoever thou wilt, and I will give it thee.

(ubi sup.) His oath does not excuse his murder, for perchance his reason for swearing was, that he might find an opportunity for slaying, and if she had demanded the death of his father and mother, he surely would not have granted it. It goes on, And she went forth, and said unto her mother, What shall I ask? And she said, The head of John the Baptist. Worthy is blood to be asked as the reward of such a deed as dancing. It goes on, And she came in straightway with haste, &c.

(ubi sup.) It is usual with Scripture, that the historian should relate events as they were then believed by all, thus Joseph is called the father of Jesus by Mary herself. So now also Herod is said to be exceeding sorry, for so the guests thought, since the hypocrite bore sadness on his face, when he had joy in his heart; and he excuses his wickedness by his oath, that he might be impious under pretence of piety. Wherefore there follows, For his oath's sake, and for their sakes who sat with him, he would not reject her.

(ubi sup.) In that again which is added, And for their sakes who sat with him, he wishes to make all partakers in his guilt, that a bloody feast might be set before luxurious and impure guests. Wherefore it goes on, But sending an executioner, he commanded his head to be brought in a charger.

Now Herod was not ashamed to bring before his guests the head of a murdered man; but we do not read of such an act of madness in Pharaoh. From both examples, however, it is proved to be more useful, often to call to mind the coming day of our death, by fear and by living chastely, than to celebrate the day of our birth with luxury. For man is born in the world to toil, but the elect pass by death out of the world to repose. It goes on, And he beheaded him in prison, &c.

(ubi sup.) There follows, And when his disciples heard of it, they came and took up his corpse, and laid it in a tomb. Josephus relates, that John was brought bound into the castle of Macheron, and there slain; and ecclesiastical history (Theodoret. Hist. Eccles. 3:3) says that he was buried in Sebaste, a city of Palestine, once called Samaria. But the beheading of John the Baptist signifies the lessening of that fame, by which he was thought to be Christ by the people, as the raising of our Saviour on the cross typifies the advance of the faith, in that He Himself, who was first looked upon as a prophet by the multitude, was recognised as the Son of God by all the faithful; wherefore John, who was destined to decrease, was born when the daylight begins to wax short; but the Lord at that season of the year in which the day begins to lengthen.
Theophylact of Ohrid (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1107
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
The Evangelist Mark, taking occasion from what went before, here relates the death of the Forerunner, saying, For Herod himself had sent forth and laid hold upon John, and bound him in prison for Herodias' sake, his brother Philip's wife: for he had married her.

The law also commanded a brother to marry his brother's wife, if he died without children; but in this case there was a daughter, which made the marriage criminal: there follows, Therefore Herodias had a quarrel against him, and would have killed him; but she could not.

But see how great is the fury of lust, for though Herod had such an awe and fear of John, he forgets it all, that he may minister to his fornication.

For during the banquet, Satan danced in the person of the damsel, and the wicked oath is completed. For it goes on, And he sware unto her, Whatsoever thou shalt ask of me, I will give it thee, unto the half of my kingdom.

The malignant woman begs that the head of John be given to her immediately, that is, at once, in that very hour, for she feared lest Herod should repent. There follows, And the king was exceeding sorry.

Herod not being his own master, but full of lust, fulfilled his oath, and slew the just man; it would have been better however to break his oath, than to commit so great a sin.

'Spiculator' is the name for the public servant commissioned to put men to death.

In a mystical way, however, Herod, whose name means, 'of skin,' is the people of the Jews, and the wife to whom he was wedded means vain glory, whose daughter even now encircles the Jews with her dance, namely, a false understanding of the Scriptures; they indeed beheaded John, that is, the word of prophecy, and hold to him without Christ, his head.
Glossa Ordinaria (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1274
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(non occ.) He feared him, I say, because he revered him, for he knew him to be just in his dealings with men, and holy towards God, and he took care that Herodias should not slay him. And when he heard him, he did many things, for he thought that he spake by the Spirit of God, and heard him gladly, because he considered that what he said was profitable.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Mark 6:23 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.