Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Pilate answered and said again unto them, What will ye then that I shall do unto him whom ye call the King of the Jews?
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And G1161 Pilate G4091 answered G611 and said G2036 again G3825 unto them G846, What G5101 will ye G2309 then G3767 that I shall do G4160 unto him whom G3739 ye call G3004 the King G935 of the Jews G2453?
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Pilate again said to them, "Then what should I do with the man you call the King of the Jews?"
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
So Pilate asked them again, “What then do you want me to do with the One you call the King of the Jews?”
Ask
American Standard Version
And Pilate again answered and said unto them, What then shall I do unto him whom ye call the King of the Jews?
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Pilate again asked them, “What then should I do to him whom you call the King of the Jews?”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Pilate answered, and said againe vnto them, What will ye then that I doe with him, whom ye call the King of the Iewes?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And Pilate answering, again said to them, `What, then, will ye that I shall do to him whom ye call king of the Jews?'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Mark Sites (Jerusalem)
All Mark Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
All Mark Sites (Levant)
All Mark Sites (Levant) View full PDF
The Last Week of Jesus' Life (With Reference Table)
The Last Week of Jesus' Life (With Reference Table) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 24,839 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Mark 15:12 captures a pivotal moment in Jesus' trial before Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor. Despite Pilate's earlier attempts to find Jesus innocent, he now confronts the agitated crowd and their religious leaders with a direct question, pressing them to articulate their desired fate for the one they ironically label "the King of the Jews." This verse underscores Pilate's moral dilemma, the volatile nature of mob rule, and the profound irony of the people rejecting their true Messiah.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated at the climax of Jesus' trial before Pilate, immediately following the crowd's manipulation by the chief priests to demand the release of Barabbas instead of Jesus (Mark 15:11). Pilate's question in Mark 15:12 is his final, desperate appeal to the crowd's reason or conscience, attempting to avert the condemnation of a man he perceives as innocent. It sets the stage for the crowd's decisive cry for crucifixion in the subsequent verses (Mark 15:13-14). This moment highlights the dramatic tension between Roman authority, Jewish religious power, and the divine will unfolding through Jesus' passion.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events occur during the Passover festival in Jerusalem, a time of heightened religious and political tension. The city was overflowing with Jewish pilgrims, and Roman authorities were acutely aware of the potential for unrest. Pontius Pilate, as the Roman prefect of Judea, held ultimate judicial authority, including the power of capital punishment. It was customary during Passover for the Roman governor to release a prisoner chosen by the crowd, a practice intended to appease the Jewish populace. Pilate's repeated questioning and efforts to release Jesus (as also seen in Luke 23:13-16) reflect his awareness of Jesus' innocence and his reluctance to condemn him without just cause, while simultaneously navigating the immense political pressure from the Jewish leadership who threatened to accuse him of disloyalty to Caesar if he released one claiming to be a king (John 19:12).
  • Key Themes: Mark 15:12 powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in the Gospel of Mark. It underscores Pilate's Moral Compromise, showcasing his internal struggle between justice and political expediency, ultimately leading to his capitulation. The verse also centralizes the theme of Jesus' Kingship, albeit in an ironic and misunderstood way. The title "King of the Jews," initially a political accusation, becomes the very inscription on the cross (Mark 15:26), highlighting the profound theological truth of Jesus' true identity as the Messiah, rejected by His own people. Furthermore, the scene vividly portrays the Power of Mob Mentality and the ease with which public opinion can be swayed by influential figures, leading to the rejection of truth and the embrace of injustice, a tragic echo of humanity's broader rejection of God's chosen one throughout salvation history.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • answered (Greek, apokrínomai', G611): This word (G611) signifies more than a simple reply; it implies a considered response, often in a judicial or confrontational context. Pilate's "answering" here is not merely reactive but a deliberate engagement with the crowd's demands, reflecting his attempt to reassert control or to appeal to their better judgment after their initial clamor for Barabbas. It highlights his active, albeit ultimately futile, participation in the unfolding drama.
  • will ye (Greek, thélō', G2309): Derived from thélō (G2309), this verb denotes a strong desire, choice, or determination stemming from subjective impulse. By asking "What will ye then," Pilate places the burden of decision squarely on the crowd, forcing them to articulate their deliberate preference. This reveals the crowd's active role in Jesus' condemnation, emphasizing their conscious choice to reject Him, rather than merely being passive observers.
  • King (Greek, basileús', G935): The term basileús (G935) refers to a sovereign or ruler. In this context, "King of the Jews" is the formal charge against Jesus, implying sedition against Rome. However, for many Jews, it carried profound messianic connotations, referring to the promised deliverer from the line of David. Pilate's repetition of this title, even as a question, underscores the central issue of Jesus' identity and claim to authority, which was simultaneously a political threat to the Roman Empire and a theological challenge to the Jewish religious establishment.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Pilate answered and said again unto them": This phrase emphasizes Pilate's persistent engagement with the crowd. The inclusion of "again" (G3825, pálin) indicates that this is not his first attempt to reason with them or to find a way to release Jesus. It suggests a renewed effort, perhaps born of frustration, reluctance, or a final, desperate hope that the crowd might reconsider their initial, manipulated demand.
  • "What will ye then that I shall do [unto him]": Here, Pilate directly challenges the crowd, shifting the responsibility for Jesus' fate back onto them. The interrogative "What" combined with "will ye" (their desire/choice) forces them to articulate their specific demand concerning Jesus. This is a rhetorical maneuver, designed to expose the irrationality or the gravity of their choice, and to highlight his own position as merely the executor of their expressed will.
  • "whom ye call the King of the Jews?": This concluding clause is laden with irony and significance. Pilate uses the very title the Jewish leaders and crowd have applied to Jesus, which is the basis of the accusation against Him. By saying "whom ye call," Pilate distances himself from the title's implications while simultaneously highlighting the absurdity of their demanding the crucifixion of someone they themselves acknowledge, even mockingly, as their "King." It underscores the profound paradox of the scene: the people rejecting their true sovereign.

Literary Devices

Mark 15:12 is rich with Irony, primarily in the crowd's rejection of Jesus, whom they themselves (or their leaders) label "the King of the Jews." This title, meant to be an accusation of sedition, is in fact Jesus' true identity, yet it is used by those who demand His death. Pilate's question itself functions as a Rhetorical Question, not genuinely seeking information but rather challenging the crowd, attempting to expose the irrationality or moral bankruptcy of their choice. It serves to highlight the governor's own reluctance to condemn an innocent man and to place the onus of the decision squarely on the agitated populace. Furthermore, the scene carries a strong element of Foreshadowing, as the title "King of the Jews" will later be affixed to the cross, ironically proclaiming Jesus' true identity to the world even in His moment of ultimate humiliation and death (Mark 15:26).

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Mark 15:12 profoundly illustrates the clash between divine sovereignty and human will, revealing the tragic extent to which humanity, when swayed by sin and fear, can reject God's appointed King. Pilate's question serves as a stark reminder that while God's plan for salvation would ultimately unfold, human choices, even those born of malice and political pressure, play a role in the drama of redemption. The crowd's manipulated cry for Jesus' crucifixion, despite Pilate's attempts to release Him, underscores the world's inherent resistance to the true King and His kingdom, which is "not of this world" (John 18:36). This rejection, however, was not an unforeseen tragedy but a necessary part of God's redemptive plan, leading to the ultimate sacrifice for the sins of humanity.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Mark 15:12 confronts us with the sobering reality of human complicity in injustice and the immense pressure to conform to popular opinion, even when it contradicts truth and righteousness. Pilate's struggle, though flawed, highlights the moral compromises we often face when caught between our convictions and external pressures. This verse challenges us to examine our own hearts: Do we, like the crowd, allow ourselves to be swayed by the prevailing currents of society, rejecting Christ's true authority in favor of worldly desires, political expediency, or popular trends? Acknowledging Jesus as "the King of the Jews" and, more broadly, as "King of kings" (Revelation 19:16), demands a radical commitment that often stands in opposition to the world's values. It calls us to courageous conviction, to stand for truth and justice even when it is unpopular, and to recognize Jesus' ultimate sovereignty over all aspects of our lives, regardless of societal acceptance or personal cost.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of your life are you most tempted to compromise your convictions due to external pressure or popular opinion?
  • How does Jesus' kingship challenge your understanding of power, authority, and true leadership?
  • What "Barabbas" (worldly desires, comforts, or allegiances) might you be tempted to choose over Jesus in your own life?

FAQ

Why did Pilate keep asking the crowd what they wanted to do with Jesus?

Answer: Pilate repeatedly questioned the crowd because he found no basis for a capital charge against Jesus and wished to release Him. He likely hoped that by forcing them to articulate their demand for Jesus' fate, they might reconsider or choose to release Him, especially given the Passover custom of releasing a prisoner. His persistent questioning, as seen in John 18:38 and Luke 23:4, reveals his internal struggle between his duty to justice and the immense political pressure from the Jewish leaders who threatened to report him to Caesar if he released Jesus, whom they accused of sedition by claiming to be a king (John 19:12).

What was the significance of the title "King of the Jews" in this context?

Answer: The title "King of the Jews" was highly significant and deeply ironic. For the Romans, it was a political charge implying sedition against Caesar, as only Caesar was king. For the Jewish religious leaders, it was a blasphemous claim if Jesus was not the Messiah, or a dangerous political claim if He was, threatening their own power and Roman occupation. However, for many Jews, it was a messianic title, referring to the promised deliverer from the line of David. Pilate's use of this title, even as the crowd rejected Jesus, underscored the profound truth of Jesus' identity as the Messiah, the true King, even as He stood condemned by His own people. This title would later be affixed to the cross, ironically proclaiming His true identity to the world (Mark 15:26).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Mark 15:12, with Pilate's question concerning Jesus, "whom ye call the King of the Jews," stands as a poignant moment foreshadowing the ultimate fulfillment of Jesus' kingship. Though rejected by His own people and condemned by Roman authority, Jesus' true reign was not of this world, as He Himself declared to Pilate (John 18:36). His willingness to be rejected and crucified, even as the "King of the Jews," was the very path to His universal sovereignty. The crowd's cry for His crucifixion, though born of malice, was paradoxically the means by which God enacted His redemptive plan, fulfilling prophecies of a suffering servant who would bear the sins of many (Isaiah 53:5). Through His death and resurrection, Jesus was not merely a king for the Jews, but He was exalted to the right hand of God, becoming King of kings and Lord of lords over all creation (Philippians 2:9-11). Thus, Pilate's question, intended to expose the crowd's irrationality, inadvertently highlighted the divine irony that the one they condemned was indeed the true and everlasting King, whose kingdom would ultimately triumph over all earthly powers and whose reign brings salvation to all who believe (Romans 10:9-10).

Copy as

Commentary on Mark 15 verses 1–14

Here we have, I. A consultation held by the great Sanhedrim for the effectual prosecution of our Lord Jesus. They met early in the morning about it, and went into a grand committee, to find out ways and means to get him put to death; they lost no time, but followed their blow in good earnest, lest there should be an uproar among the people. The unwearied industry of wicked people in doing that which is evil, should shame us for our backwardness and slothfulness in that which is good. They that war against Christ and thy soul, are up early; How long then wilt thou sleep, O sluggard?

II. The delivering of him up a prisoner to Pilate; they bound him. He was to be the great sacrifice, and sacrifices must be bound with cords, Psa 118:27. Christ was bound, to make bonds easy to us, and enable us, as Paul and Silas, to sing in bonds. It is good for us often to remember the bonds of the Lord Jesus, as bound with him who was bound for us. They led him through the streets of Jerusalem, to expose him to contempt, who, while he taught in the temple, but a day or two before, was had in veneration; and we may well imagine how miserably he looked after such a night's usage as he had had; so buffeted, spit upon, and abused. Their delivering him to the Roman power was a type of ruin of their church, which hereby they merited, and brought upon themselves; it signified that the promise, the covenant, and the oracles, of God, and the visible state church, which were the glory of Israel, and had been so long in their possession, should now be delivered up to the Gentiles. By delivering up the king they do, in effect, deliver up the kingdom of God, which is therefore, as it were, by their own consent, taken from them, and given to another nation. If they had delivered up Christ, to gratify the desires of the Romans, or to satisfy and jealousies of theirs concerning him, it had been another matter; but they voluntarily betrayed him that was Israel's crown, to them that were Israel's yoke.

III. The examining of him by Pilate upon interrogatories (Mar 15:2); "Art thou the king of the Jews? Dost thou pretend to be so, to be that Messiah whom the Jews expect as a temporal prince?" - "Yea," saith Christ, "it is as thou sayest, I am that Messiah, but not such a one as they expect." He is the king that rules and protects his Israel according to the spirit, who are Jews inwardly by the circumcision of the spirit, and the king that will restrain and punish the carnal Jews, who continue in unbelief.

IV. The articles of impeachment exhibited against him, and his silence under the charge and accusation. The chief priests forgot the dignity of their place, when they turned informers, and did in person accuse Christ of many things (Mar 15:3), and witness against him, Mar 15:4. Many of the Old Testament prophets charge the priests of their times with great wickedness, in which well did they prophesy of these priests; see Eze 22:26; Hos 5:1; Hos 6:9; Mic 3:11; Zep 3:4; Mal 1:6; Mal 2:8. The destruction of Jerusalem by the Chaldeans is said to be for the iniquity of the priests that shed the blood of the just, Lam 4:13. Note, Wicked priests are generally the worst of men. The better any thing is, the worse it is when it is corrupted. Lay persecutors have been generally found more compassionate than ecclesiastics. These priests were very eager and noisy in their accusation; but Christ answered nothing, Mar 15:3. When Pilate urged him to clear himself, and was desirous he should (Mar 15:4), yet still he stood mute (Mar 15:5), he answered nothing, which Pilate thought very strange. He gave Pilate a direct answer (Mar 15:2), but would not answer the prosecutors and witnesses, because the things they alleged, were notoriously false, and he knew Pilate himself was convinced they were so. Note, As Christ spoke to admiration, so he kept silence to admiration.

V. The proposal Pilate made to the people, to have Jesus released to them, since it was the custom of the feast to grace the solemnity with the release of one prisoner. The people expected and demanded that he should do as he had ever done to them (Mar 15:8); it was not an ill usage, but they would have it kept up. Now Pilate perceived that the chief priests delivered up Jesus for envy, because he had got such a reputation among the people as eclipsed theirs, Mar 15:10. It was easy to see, comparing the eagerness of the prosecutors with the slenderness of the proofs, that it was not his guilt, but his goodness, not any thing mischievous or scandalous, but something meritorious and glorious, that they were provoked at. And therefore, hearing how much he was the darling of the crowd, he thought that he might safely appeal from the priests to the people, and that they would be proud of rescuing him out of the priests' hands; and he proposed an expedient for their doing it without danger of an uproar; let them demand him to be released, and Pilate will be ready to do it, and stop the mouths of the priests with this - that the people insisted upon his release. There was indeed another prisoner, one Barabbas, that had an interest, and would have some votes; but he questioned not but Jesus would out-poll him.

VI. The unanimous outrageous clamours of the people have Christ put to death, and particularly to have him crucified. It was a great surprise to Pilate, when he found the people so much under the influence of the priests, that they all agreed to desire that Barabbas might be released, Mar 15:11. Pilate opposed it all he could; "What will ye that I shall do to him whom ye call the King of the Jews? Would not ye then have him released too?" Mar 15:12. No, say they, Crucify him. The priests having put that in their mouths, the insist upon it; when Pilate objected, Why, what evil has he done? (a very material question in such a case), they did not pretend to answer it, but cried out more exceedingly, as they were more and more instigated and irritated by the priests, Crucify him, crucify him. Now the priests, who were very busy dispersing themselves and their creatures among the mob, to keep up the cry, promised themselves that it would influence Pilate two ways to condemn him. 1. It might incline him to believe Christ guilty, when there was so general an out-cry against him. "Surely," might Pilate think, "he must needs be a bad man, whom all the world is weary of." He would now conclude that he had been misinformed, when he was told what an interest he had in the people, and that the matter was not so. But the priest had hurried on the prosecution with so much expedition, that we may suppose that they who were Christ's friends, and would have opposed this cry, were at the other end of the town, and knew nothing of the matter. Note, It has been the common artifice of Satan, to put Christ and his religion into an ill name, and so to run them down. When once this sect, as they called it, comes to be every where spoken against, though without cause, then that is looked upon as cause enough to condemn it. But let us judge of persons and things by their merits, and the standard of God's word, and not prejudge by common fame and the cry of the country. 2. It might induce him to condemn Christ, to please the people, and indeed for fear of displeasing them. Though he was not so weak as to be governed by their opinion, to believe him guilty, yet he was so wicked as to be swayed by their outrage, to condemn him, though he believed him innocent; induced thereunto by reasons of state, and the wisdom of the world. Our Lord Jesus dying as a sacrifice for the sins of many, he fell a sacrifice to the rage of many.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–14. Public domain.
Copy as
Pseudo-Jerome (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Here are two goats; one is the scape goat, that is, one loosed and sent out into the wilderness of hell with the sin of the people; the other is slain, as a lamb, for the sins of those who are forgiven. The Lord's portion is always slain; the devil's part, (for he is the master of those men, which is the meaning of Barabbas,) when freed, is cast headlong into hell.
Augustine of HippoAD 430
Those who cried out that he should be crucified were the Lord’s real crucifiers, rather than those who simply discharged their service to their chief according to their duty. .
Augustine of Hippo (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 430
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(ubi sup.) No one can feel it a difficulty that Matthew is silent as to their asking some one to be released unto them, which Mark here mentions; for it is a thing of no consequence that one should mention a thing which another leaves out. There follows: But Pilate answered them, saying, Will ye that I release unto you the King of the Jews? For he knew that the Chief Priests had delivered him for envy. Some one may ask, which were the words of which Pilate made use, those which are related by Matthew, or those which Mark relates; for there seems to be a difference between, Whom will ye that I release unto you? Barabbas, or Jesus which is called Christ? as Matthew has it; and, Will ye that I release unto you the King of the Jews? (Matt. 27:17) as is here said. But since they gave to kings the name of Christs, he who said this man or that must have asked whether they wished the King of the Jews to be released unto them, that is, Christ. It makes no difference to the sense that Mark has said nothing of Barabbas, wishing only to mention what belonged to the Lord, since by their answer he sufficiently showed whom they wished to have released to them. For there follows, But the Chief Priests moved the people that he should rather release unto them Barabbas.

(ubi sup.) It now is clear enough that Mark means by King of the Jews what Matthew means by the word Christ; for no kings but those of the Jews were called Christs. For in this place according to Matthew it is said, What then shall I do with Jesus which is called Christ? There follows, And they cried out again, Crucify him. (Matt. 27:22)
Bede (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 735
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(ubi sup.) Pilate furnished many opportunities of releasing Jesus, in the first place contrasting a robber with the Just One. Wherefore it is said, Now at that feast he released unto them one prisoner, whomsoever they desired.

(ubi sup.) This demand which the Jews made with such toil to themselves still sticks to them. Because, when the choice was given to them, they chose a robber instead of Christ, a murderer instead of the Saviour, they deservedly lost their salvation and their life, and they subjected themselves to such a degree to robbery and sedition, that they lost their country and their kingdom which they preferred to Christ, and never regained their liberty, body or soul. Then Pilate gives another opportunity of releasing the Saviour, when there follows, And Pilate answered and said again unto them, What will ye then that I should do unto the King of the Jews?

(ubi sup.) But the Jews giving loose to their madness do not answer the question of the judge. Wherefore it goes on, And they cried out the more exceedingly, Crucify him, that those words of the Prophet Jeremiah might be fulfilled, Mine heritage is unto me as a lion in the forest, it crieth out against me. (Jer. 12:8) There follows, And so Pilate, willing to content the people, released Barabbas unto them, and delivered Jesus, when he had scourged him, to be crucified.

(ubi sup.) We must understand that Jesus was scourged by no other than Pilate himself. For John writes, Pilate took Jesus, and scourged him, (John 13:1) which we must suppose that he did, that the Jews might be satisfied with His pains and insults, and cease from thirsting for His blood.
BedeAD 735
On the Gospel of Mark
But Pilate again, answering, said to them: What then do you want me to do with the king of the Jews? But they again shouted: Crucify him. However, Pilate was saying to them: What evil has he done? Pilate gave many opportunities to free the Savior: first, comparing him to the thief, then saying: What then do you want me to do with the king of the Jews? And when they answered, "Crucify him," he did not immediately comply, but, according to the suggestion of his wife who had sent word to him, as Matthew writes: Have nothing to do with that just man (Matthew 27), he himself also seriously responding: What, he said, has he done wrong? By saying this, Pilate absolved Jesus.
Theophylact of Ohrid (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1107
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Now see the wickedness of the Jews, and the moderation of Pilate, though he too was worthy of condemnation for not resisting the people. For they cried out, Crucify; he faintly tries to save Jesus from their determined sentence, and again puts a question to them. Wherefore there follows, Then Pilate said unto them, Why, what evil hath he done? For he wished in this way to find an opportunity for releasing Christ, who was innocent.

He wished indeed to satisfy the people, that is, to do their will, not what was agreeable to justice and to God.
Glossa Ordinaria (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1274
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(non occ.) Which indeed he was accustomed to do, to obtain favour with the people, and above all, on the feast day, when the people of the whole province of the Jews flocked to Jerusalem. And that the wickedness of the Jews might appear the greater, the enormity of the sin of the robber, whom they preferred to Christ, is next described. Wherefore there follows: And there was one Barabbas, who lay bound with them that had made insurrection with him, who had committed murder in the insurrection. In which words their wickedness is shown both from the heinousness of his signal crime, in that he had committed murder, and from the way in which he did it, because he had in doing it raised a sedition and disturbed the city, and also because his crime was notorious, for he was bound with seditious persons. It goes on: And the multitude, when it had come up, began to desire him to do as he had ever done unto them.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Mark 15:12 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.