TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Mark 14:66–72. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
We have here the story of Peter's denying Christ.
1.It began in keeping at a distance from him. Peter had followed afar off (Mar 14:54), and now was beneath in the palace, at the lower end of the hall. Those that are shy of Christ, are in a fair way to deny him, that are shy of attending on holy ordinances, shy of the communion of the faithful, and loth to be seen on the side of despised godliness.
2.It was occasioned by his associating with the high priest's servants, and sitting among them. They that think it dangerous to be in company with Christ's disciples, because thence they may be drawn in to suffer for him, will find it much more dangerous to be in company with his enemies, because there they may be drawn in to sin against him.
3.The temptation was, his being charged as a disciple of Christ; Thou also wert with Jesus of Nazareth, Mar 14:67. This is one of them (Mar 14:69), for thou art a Galilean, one may know that by thy speaking broad, Mar 14:70. It doth not appear that he was challenged upon it, or in danger of being prosecuted as a criminal for it, but only bantered upon it, and in danger of being ridiculed as a fool for it. While the chief priests were abusing the Master, the servants were abusing the disciples. Sometimes the cause of Christ seems to fall so much on the losing side, that every body has a stone to throw at it, and even the abjects gather themselves together against it. When Job was on the dunghill, he was had in derision of those that were the children of base men, Job 30:8. Yet, all things considered, the temptation could not be called formidable; it was only a maid that casually cast her eye upon him, and, for aught that appears, without design of giving him any trouble, said, Thou art one of them, to which he needed not to have made any reply, or might have said, "And if I be, I hope that is no treason."
4.The sin was very great; he denied Christ before men, at a time when he ought to have confessed and owned him, and to have appeared in court a witness for him. Christ had often given notice to his disciples of his own sufferings; yet, when they came, they were to Peter as great a surprise and terror as if he had never heard of them before. He had often told them that they must suffer for him, must take up their cross, and follow him; and yet Peter is so terribly afraid of suffering, upon the very first alarm of it, that he will lie and swear, and do any thing, to avoid it. When Christ was admired and flocked after, he could readily own him; but now that he is deserted, and despised, and run down, he is ashamed of him, and will own no relation to him.
5.His repentance was very speedy. He repeated his denial thrice, and the third was worst of all, for then he cursed and swore, to confirm his denial; and that the third blow, which, one would think, should have stunned him, and knocked him down, startled him, and roused him up. Then the cock crew the second time, which put him in mind of his Master's words, the warning he had given him, with that particular circumstance of the cock crowing twice; by recollecting that, he was made sensible of his sin and the aggravations of it; and when he thought thereon, he wept. Some observe that this evangelist, who wrote, as some have thought, by St. Peter's direction, speaks as fully of Peter's sin as any of them, but more briefly of his sorrow, which Peter, in modesty, would not have to be magnified, and because he thought he could never sorrow enough for great a sin. His repentance here is thus expressed, epibalōn eklaie, where something must be supplied. He added to weep, so some; making it a Hebraism; he wept, and the more he thought of it, the more he wept; he continued weeping; he flung out, and wept; burst out into tears; threw himself down, and wept; he covered his face, and wept, so some; cast his garment about his head, that he might not be seen to weep; he cast his eyes upon his Master, who turned, and looked upon him; so Dr. Hammond supplies it, and it is a probable conjecture. Or, as we understand it, fixing his mind upon it, he wept. It is not a transient thought of that which is humbling, that will suffice, but we must dwell upon it. Or, what if this word should mean his laying a load upon himself, throwing a confusion into his own face? he did as the publican that smote his breast, in sorrow for sin; and this amounts to his weeping bitterly.
Historical interpretation
Four Centuries of Reception
4 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Peter when he had not the Spirit yielded and lost courage at the voice of a girl, though with the Spirit he was not afraid before princes and kings.
But in a mystical sense, the first maid means the wavering, the second, the assent, the third man is the act. This is the threefold denial which the remebrance of the word of the Lord washes away through tears. The cock then crows for us when some preacher up our hearts by repentance to compunction. We then begin to weep, when we are set on fire within by the spark of knowledge, and we go forth, when we cast out what we were within.
(upi. sup.) But what can be meant by his being first recognised by a woman, when men were more able to know him, if it be not that that sex might be seen to sin in the death of our Lord, and that sex be redeemed by His Passion? It goes on: But he denied, saying, I know not, neither understand I what thou sayest.
(ubi sup.) The other Evangelists do not mention this crowing of the cock; they do not however deny the fact, as also some pass over many other things in silence, which others relate. There follows: And a maid saw him again, and began to say to them that stood by, This is one of them
(ubi sup.) By this denial of Peter we learn, that not only he denies Christ, who says that He is not the Christ, but he also, who although he is a Christian, denies himself to be such. For the Lord did not say to Peter, Thou shalt deny thyself to be my disciple, but, Thou shalt deny me; he therefore denied Christ, when he said that he was not His disciple. There follows: And a little after, they that stood by said again to Peter, Surely thou art one of them, for thou art a Galilæan, and thy speech agreeth thereto. Not that the Galilæans spoke a different tongue from the inhabitants of Jerusalem, for they were both Hebrews, but that each province and region has its own peculiarities, and cannot avoid a vernacular pronunciation.
(ubi sup.) How hurtful is it to speak with the wicked. He denies before infidels that he knows the man, whom amongst the disciples, he had confessed to be God. But the Scripture is wont to point out a Sacrament of the causes of things, by the state of the time; thus Peter, who denied at midnight, repented at cock crow; wherefore it is added: And the second time the cock crew. And Peter called to mind the word which Jesus said unto him, Before the cock crow twice, thou shalt deny me thrice. And he began to weep.
And he went out before the courtyard, and the cock crowed. Of this crowing of the cock, the other evangelists are silent, though they do not deny that it happened, just as many others pass over in silence many things which others recount.
The Lord allowed this to happen to him by His providence, that is, lest he should be too much elated, and at the same time, that he might prove himself merciful to sinners, as knowing from himself the result of human weakness. There follows: And he went out into the porch; and the cock crew.
Therefore Peter was seized with fear, and for-getting the word of the Lord, which said, Whosoever shall confess me before men, him will I confess before my Father, (Matt. 30, 32) he denied our Lord; wherefore there follows: But he began to curse and to swear, saying, I know not this man of whom ye speak.
For tears brought Peter by penitence to Christ. Confounded then be the Novatians, who say that he who sins after receiving baptism, is not received to the remission of his sin. For behold Peter, who had also received the Body and Blood of the Lord, is received by penitence; for the failings of saints are written, that if we fall by want of caution, we also may be able to run back through their example, and hope to be relieved by penitence.
Continue studying Mark 14:68 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Mark 14:68 captures the initial, emphatic denial by Peter of his association with Jesus, fulfilling the first part of Jesus' prophecy concerning Peter's threefold betrayal. Amidst the tension and danger of the high priest's courtyard following Jesus' arrest, Peter, confronted by a servant girl, vehemently disavows any knowledge of Jesus or understanding of the accusation, subsequently retreating to the relative obscurity of the porch as the first cockcrow signals the unfolding of divine foreknowledge through human weakness.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is situated within the intensely dramatic and sorrowful narrative of Jesus' passion. Immediately preceding Mark 14:68, Jesus has been unjustly arrested in the Garden of Gethsemane (Mark 14:43-52), abandoned by His disciples, and brought before the Sanhedrin for a sham trial (Mark 14:53-65). Peter, despite his earlier bold declaration of unwavering loyalty (Mark 14:29-31), follows "at a distance" (Mark 14:54), entering the high priest's courtyard. The immediate context is one of fear, betrayal, and the unfolding of prophetic events, with Peter's denial standing in stark contrast to Jesus' steadfast confession before the authorities.
Historical & Cultural Context
The setting is the courtyard of the high priest's house in Jerusalem, likely late at night or in the early hours of the morning, during the Passover festival. This was a time of heightened religious and political tension. Jewish law prohibited trials at night, making Jesus' trial illegal. High priests' houses often had large courtyards where servants and guards would gather, especially to warm themselves by a fire during the cool night, as mentioned in Mark 14:54. Peter, as a Galilean, would have had a distinct accent that could betray his origin, making him conspicuous among the Judean populace. The presence of a "servant girl" (paidiske) in such a public but restricted area highlights the social dynamics of the time, where even those of lower status could challenge and identify individuals. The crowing of a cock was a common occurrence in urban and semi-urban areas, serving as a natural time marker for the early morning hours.
Key Themes
This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in Mark's Gospel. Firstly, it underscores the theme of human frailty and failure, particularly among Jesus' closest followers. Despite Peter's earlier fervent pledge to die with Jesus (Mark 14:31), his fear of identification leads to a profound moral collapse. Secondly, it highlights the unquestionable fulfillment of prophecy, as Jesus' precise prediction in Mark 14:30 begins to unfold with chilling accuracy. This emphasizes Jesus' divine foreknowledge and the sovereign control of God over unfolding events, even through human sin. Lastly, the passage touches on the theme of discipleship under pressure, illustrating the immense challenge of remaining faithful when faced with social ostracism, physical threat, or the fear of association with a condemned figure. Peter's denial serves as a cautionary tale for all who claim allegiance to Christ.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This verb means "to contradict, i.e. disavow, reject, abnegate." Peter's denial is not merely a statement of ignorance but an active disassociation and repudiation of any connection to Jesus. It signifies a profound act of unfaithfulness, a complete turning away from his previous confession and commitment. The force of the word indicates a deliberate and strong renunciation.
While primarily meaning "to see (literally or figuratively)," in its perfect tense (as used here in "I know not"), it carries the implication "to know." Peter's assertion "I know not" is a claim of complete unfamiliarity, a denial of any personal acquaintance with Jesus. This is a direct lie, as Peter had spent years intimately following Jesus, but it serves to create distance and sever any perceived link to the accused.
This noun refers to "a forecourt, i.e. vestibule (alley-way)." Peter's movement "out into the porch" suggests a strategic retreat from the immediate vicinity of the fire and the direct gaze of his accusers. It implies a desire for greater anonymity and a physical distancing from the scene of the trial, perhaps hoping to escape further scrutiny or to simply gain a moment to compose himself. This physical movement underscores his internal turmoil and desire to avoid further confrontation.
Verse Breakdown
"But he denied, saying, I know not, neither understand I what thou sayest."
This clause captures Peter's initial, emphatic response to the servant girl's accusation. His denial is twofold: first, a claim of complete ignorance ("I know not") regarding Jesus, and second, a feigned lack of comprehension ("neither understand I what thou sayest") concerning the very nature of her accusation. This layered denial is designed to deflect suspicion entirely, portraying himself as an innocent bystander utterly disconnected from the events unfolding. The Greek structure with "neither... nor" (οὐδὲ... οὐδὲ) emphasizes the totality of his disavowal.
"And he went out into the porch;"
Following his denial, Peter physically withdraws from the immediate area where he was warming himself by the fire. Moving into the "porch" or vestibule, which was likely a less crowded and darker area, represents his attempt to escape further identification and the intense scrutiny of those around him. This movement is a physical manifestation of his desire to distance himself from the dangerous situation and the identity of a disciple of Jesus.
"and the cock crew."
This brief, stark statement is profoundly significant. The crowing of the cock serves as an immediate, undeniable, and divinely orchestrated sign. It marks the precise moment of the first fulfillment of Jesus' prophecy from Mark 14:30, signaling to the reader (and implicitly to Peter, though he may not immediately grasp its full import) that Jesus' words are true and that Peter's failure is unfolding exactly as foretold. It introduces a moment of profound spiritual gravity and foreshadows Peter's subsequent realization and repentance.
Literary Devices
Mark employs several potent literary devices in this concise verse. Dramatic Irony is evident as the reader is fully aware of Peter's true identity and his earlier fervent vows of loyalty, making his emphatic denial ("I know not, neither understand I what thou sayest") deeply ironic and tragic. The verse also functions as a powerful instance of Prophecy Fulfillment, as the crowing of the cock immediately after Peter's denial directly actualizes Jesus' earlier prediction in Mark 14:30. This highlights Jesus' divine foreknowledge and the inerrancy of His word. Furthermore, the cock's crow acts as a potent Symbolism, serving as a stark, auditory signal of Peter's betrayal and the dawning of a new, painful reality for him. The movement "into the porch" can be seen as Symbolic Action, representing Peter's attempt to retreat from the light of truth and the public eye, seeking refuge in a darker, more obscure space, mirroring his spiritual withdrawal.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Mark 14:68 stands as a poignant testament to the profound vulnerability of even the most devoted followers of Christ under extreme pressure. Peter's denial, despite his earlier bold declarations, underscores the pervasive reality of human weakness and the insidious power of fear. Theologically, this moment highlights the stark contrast between human fallibility and divine sovereignty; while Peter falters, Jesus' prophecy remains steadfastly true, demonstrating God's ultimate control over the unfolding of His redemptive plan. This incident serves as a crucial reminder that our strength is not inherent but derived from God, and without constant reliance on Him, even the most zealous among us can stumble. Yet, it is also a testament to the depth of grace, as this failure sets the stage for Peter's later repentance and restoration, revealing God's unwavering commitment to His chosen ones despite their shortcomings.
Reflection and Application
Mark 14:68 offers a sobering yet ultimately hopeful mirror for contemporary believers. Peter's denial serves as a stark reminder that even those who walk closely with Christ are susceptible to fear, compromise, and failure when faced with societal pressure or personal danger. It compels us to honestly examine our own lives: In what ways do we deny Christ, perhaps not with explicit words, but through our silence when we should speak, our inaction when we should serve, or our conformity to the world when we should stand apart? This passage urges vigilance and humility, recognizing that our spiritual strength is not self-generated but sustained by God's grace and constant communion with Him. Just as Peter's failure was part of a larger narrative of restoration, this verse also offers profound hope: even in our moments of deepest spiritual failure, God's grace is sufficient to forgive, restore, and re-commission us for His purposes. It calls us to cultivate a deeper reliance on Christ, to pray for strength in temptation, and to remember that true discipleship often requires courage in the face of adversity.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did Peter deny Jesus, especially after his bold declaration of loyalty?
Peter's denial stemmed from a complex interplay of fear, self-preservation, and human weakness. Despite his genuine love and loyalty for Jesus, the immediate threat of arrest and persecution, coupled with the overwhelming pressure of being identified with a condemned man, caused him to falter. His earlier declaration of loyalty in Mark 14:31 was made in a moment of confidence, but the reality of the situation in the high priest's courtyard was far more terrifying and immediate. His actions highlight the universal human tendency to succumb to fear under extreme duress, even for those with strong convictions.
What is the significance of the cock crowing in this verse?
The crowing of the cock is profoundly significant because it serves as the immediate and undeniable fulfillment of Jesus' prophecy to Peter in Mark 14:30. It acts as a divine timestamp, marking the precise moment Peter's first denial occurs. For the reader, it underscores Jesus' divine foreknowledge and the absolute certainty of His words. For Peter, as the narrative progresses, the cock's crow becomes a piercing reminder of his failure and a catalyst for his bitter repentance (Mark 14:72). It is a powerful symbol of divine truth breaking through human deceit.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Mark 14:68, detailing Peter's profound failure, paradoxically magnifies the perfect faithfulness of Christ. While Peter denies knowing Jesus out of fear, Jesus, at that very moment, is steadfastly confessing His divine identity before the Sanhedrin, even unto death (Mark 14:61-62). Jesus, the sinless Son of God, perfectly fulfilled the Law and endured the full weight of human sin, including the very denial Peter was committing. His foreknowledge of Peter's betrayal (Mark 14:30) was not a passive observation but an active part of His redemptive plan, demonstrating His sovereignty even over the failures of His disciples. The crowing of the cock, a sign of Peter's sin, simultaneously points to the dawning of the day of salvation, secured by Jesus' unwavering obedience and sacrificial love. Christ's perfect obedience, even to the point of death on a cross, stands in stark contrast to Peter's momentary unfaithfulness, highlighting that our salvation rests not on our fleeting loyalty but on the unshakeable faithfulness of the Lamb of God, who bore our sins and secures our restoration (Isaiah 53:5; Romans 5:8). Jesus, our sympathetic High Priest, understands our weaknesses, having been tempted in every way, yet without sin (Hebrews 4:15), and it is through His perfect work that Peter, and all believers, find forgiveness and restoration.