Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Behold, O LORD, and consider to whom thou hast done this. Shall the women eat their fruit, and children of a span long? shall the priest and the prophet be slain in the sanctuary of the Lord?
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Behold H7200, O LORD H3068, and consider H5027 to whom thou hast done H5953 this H3541. Shall the women H802 eat H398 their fruit H6529, and children H5768 of a span long H2949? shall the priest H3548 and the prophet H5030 be slain H2026 in the sanctuary H4720 of the Lord H136?
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
ADONAI, look and see who it is you have thus tormented! Should women eat the fruit of their wombs, the children they have held in their hands? Should cohanim and prophets be slaughtered in the sanctuary of Adonai?
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Look, O LORD, and consider: Whom have You ever treated like this? Should women eat their offspring, the infants they have nurtured? Should priests and prophets be killed in the sanctuary of the Lord?
Ask
American Standard Version
See, O Jehovah, and behold to whom thou hast done thus! Shall the women eat their fruit, the children that are dandled in the hands? Shall the priest and the prophet be slain in the sanctuary of the Lord?
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Look, LORD, and see to whom you have done thus! Shall the women eat their fruit, the children that are dandled in the hands? Shall the priest and the prophet be killed in the sanctuary of the Lord?
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Beholde, O Lord, and consider to whome thou hast done thus: shall the women eate their fruite, and children of a spanne long? shall the Priest and the Prophet be slaine in the Sanctuarie of the Lord?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
See, O Jehovah, and look attentively, To whom Thou hast acted thus, Do women eat their fruit, infants of a handbreadth? Slain in the sanctuary of the Lord are priest and prophet?
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Lamentations 2:20 presents a harrowing and desperate plea from the prophet to the LORD, vividly portraying the unimaginable atrocities endured during Jerusalem's siege and subsequent fall. It graphically details the ultimate horror of famine-induced cannibalism, where women are driven to consume their own infants, and the profound sacrilege of priests and prophets being slaughtered within the very sanctuary of the Lord. This verse serves as a climactic lament, questioning divine action and appealing for God's compassionate attention in the face of unparalleled human suffering and the desecration of all that was sacred.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Lamentations 2:20 is situated within the second chapter of Lamentations, which attributes Jerusalem's devastation directly to the LORD's active judgment. Unlike Chapter 1, which laments the city's desolate state, Chapter 2 employs strong, active verbs to describe God's wrath as the primary agent of destruction. The verses immediately preceding this one depict widespread death and starvation, with children and infants perishing in the streets and in their mothers' arms, as seen in the heart-wrenching imagery of Lamentations 2:11-12. Verse 20 intensifies this horror, moving from general suffering to the most extreme and taboo acts, directly appealing to God to "Behold, O LORD, and consider" the full extent of the calamity He has brought or allowed. It functions as a climactic expression of despair and a direct, anguished challenge to the divine presence, underscoring the depth of the covenant curses fulfilled.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The historical setting for Lamentations is the catastrophic fall of Jerusalem to the Babylonian Empire in 586 BC. This event involved a prolonged and brutal siege, culminating in the destruction of the First Temple and the forced exile of the Jewish people. Beyond a military defeat, it represented a profound theological crisis for Israel, challenging their understanding of God's covenant faithfulness and His dwelling among them. The siege led to extreme famine, disease, and desperation, vividly documented throughout the book. Culturally, the act of parents consuming their children was the ultimate taboo, a sign of utter societal collapse and a dire curse explicitly prophesied for covenant disobedience in passages such as Deuteronomy 28:53 and Leviticus 26:29. The slaying of priests and prophets within the sanctuary was an act of profound sacrilege, violating the sanctity of the holy place and the sacred office, signifying the complete breakdown of divine protection and human order.
  • Key Themes: Lamentations 2:20 encapsulates several major themes prevalent throughout the entire book. Foremost is the theme of Divine Judgment, where God's righteous wrath against persistent sin and covenant unfaithfulness is fully realized, leading to unprecedented suffering. This judgment is so severe that it results in Unimaginable Suffering and Desperation, pushing humanity to the very brink of survival, as evidenced by the horrifying act of cannibalism. The verse also highlights the theme of Sacrilege and Profanity, where the holy city, the sacred Temple, and even God's consecrated servants (priests and prophets) are subjected to violence and desecration, signifying the complete removal of God's protective hand and the violation of all that was considered sacred. Finally, despite the overwhelming despair, there is an underlying theme of Desperate Appeal to God, as the prophet cries out to the LORD to "Behold, and consider," demonstrating that even in the darkest moments, the only recourse is to turn to the very God who has brought the judgment, seeking His attention and perhaps, ultimately, His compassion, a theme of enduring hope echoed in Lamentations 3:21-23.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Done (Hebrew, ʻâlal', H5953): This word implies more than a simple action. It means "to effect thoroughly," and in a negative context, "to maltreat, abuse, or impose." When the prophet asks, "to whom thou hast done this," the underlying Hebrew suggests a profound questioning of God's active, thorough, and devastating role in allowing or inflicting such severe abuse and suffering upon His people. It conveys a sense of God's comprehensive work of judgment, not merely a passive allowance of events.
  • Span long (Hebrew, ṭippuch', H2949): This term refers to a "nursing" or "span-long" child, indicating an infant or a very young child, perhaps only nine inches long (the length of a hand span). The inclusion of this detail intensifies the horror of the cannibalism described, emphasizing the extreme vulnerability and innocence of the victims. This specificity makes the act even more heinous and the suffering more poignant, underscoring the utter desperation that would drive mothers to such an unthinkable act.
  • Sanctuary (Hebrew, miqdâsh', H4720): This word denotes a "consecrated thing or place," specifically a "holy place" or "sanctuary." The question, "shall the priest and the prophet be slain in the sanctuary of the Lord?" highlights the profound sacrilege and desecration that occurred. The sanctuary was the very place of God's presence, where holiness was maintained. Its defilement by the shedding of innocent blood, especially of those consecrated to God's service, signifies the complete breakdown of the covenant relationship and the removal of divine protection from even the holiest of spaces.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Behold, O LORD, and consider to whom thou hast done this.": This opening clause is a direct, desperate plea to God. The prophet, speaking on behalf of the suffering community, implores the LORD (using the covenant name YHWH, H3068, emphasizing His relational aspect) to actively witness and acknowledge the unparalleled suffering. The phrase "to whom thou hast done this" uses the Hebrew word ʻâlal (H5953), which implies a thorough and severe action, suggesting that this calamity is not merely an unfortunate event but a direct consequence of God's judgment or His allowing of such extreme maltreatment. It is a cry for divine attention and compassion from the very source of their pain.
  • "Shall the women eat their fruit, [and] children of a span long?": This is a rhetorical question that expresses the deepest horror and moral outrage. "Their fruit" refers to their offspring, their own children. The added detail "children of a span long" (H2949, ṭippuch) emphasizes that these are infants or very young children, making the act of cannibalism even more ghastly and unthinkable. This question highlights the extreme famine and desperation that has driven mothers to violate the most fundamental human and natural bonds, fulfilling the dire curses of the covenant for disobedience.
  • "shall the priest and the prophet be slain in the sanctuary of the Lord?": This second rhetorical question points to the profound sacrilege and desecration of holy persons and holy space. Priests (H3548, kôhên) and prophets (H5030, nâbîyʼ) were consecrated to God's service, and the sanctuary (H4720, miqdâsh) was the sacred dwelling place of the Lord (H136, ʼĂdônây). Their slaughter within this holy precinct signifies the complete breakdown of divine protection, the violation of sacred boundaries, and the utter profanity of the judgment. It underscores that even those dedicated to God and the very place of His presence were not spared from the devastating consequences of sin.

Literary Devices

Lamentations 2:20 masterfully employs several literary devices to convey its profound sorrow and horror. The primary device is the Rhetorical Question, repeated twice ("Shall the women eat their fruit...?", "shall the priest and the prophet be slain...?"). These questions are not posed to elicit information but to express outrage, disbelief, and the unspeakable nature of the events, emphasizing that such atrocities should be unimaginable, yet they are tragically occurring. This is coupled with vivid and disturbing Graphic Imagery, particularly the depiction of mothers consuming their infants and holy figures being slain in the sanctuary. While literally true in the context of extreme siege, the imagery serves to shock the audience and underscore the ultimate depths of human suffering and divine judgment. The verse also powerfully evokes Pathos, appealing to the reader's emotions through the depiction of innocent suffering, the violation of natural bonds, and the desecration of the sacred. The opening plea, "Behold, O LORD, and consider," is an urgent cry for divine attention, laden with emotional anguish and a desperate appeal for divine intervention.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Lamentations 2:20 stands as a stark testament to the severity of God's judgment when His covenant people persistently rebel against Him. It underscores the biblical principle that disobedience carries dire consequences, fulfilling the curses outlined in the Mosaic Law. This verse reveals a God who is not merely merciful but also holy and just, willing to allow unimaginable suffering to bring about repentance and demonstrate the gravity of sin. It challenges simplistic notions of divine protection, showing that even the sacred Temple and its ministers are not immune to judgment when the people have forsaken their covenant obligations. The prophet's cry, though filled with anguish, is still directed to the LORD, indicating a deep-seated belief in God's ultimate sovereignty and the hope, however faint, that He might yet "consider" and show compassion.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Lamentations 2:20 confronts us with the profound and terrifying consequences of sin and rebellion against a holy God. It serves as a sobering reminder that God's justice is as real as His mercy, and that turning away from His ways can lead to unimaginable societal and personal brokenness. For us today, this verse calls for deep introspection: Are there areas in our lives, our communities, or our nations where we have neglected God's commands, ignored His warnings, or profaned what is holy? It compels us to cultivate a profound reverence for God's holiness and to take seriously the call to repentance and obedience. Furthermore, it challenges us to consider the suffering in our world, whether from natural disaster, conflict, or moral decay, and to intercede with the same desperate earnestness as the prophet, seeking God's mercy and intervention. It also reminds us of the sanctity of human life, especially the most vulnerable, and the sacredness of places dedicated to God, urging us to protect and honor both.

Questions for Reflection

  • What does this verse reveal about the gravity of sin and its consequences, both individually and corporately?
  • How does the prophet's desperate plea to "Behold, O LORD, and consider" inform our own prayers in times of suffering or perceived divine absence?
  • In what ways might we, even unintentionally, "desecrate the sanctuary" or diminish the holiness of God's presence in our lives or communities today?
  • How does this passage challenge our understanding of God's character, particularly His justice alongside His mercy?

FAQ

What is the significance of "children of a span long"?

Answer: The phrase "children of a span long" (Hebrew: ṭippuch, H2949) specifically refers to infants or very young children, typically measuring about nine inches, the length of a human hand span. Its significance lies in intensifying the horror of the scene. By specifying such vulnerable, innocent victims, the prophet emphasizes the extreme and unthinkable depths of desperation to which the people of Jerusalem were driven by the prolonged siege and famine. It highlights the complete breakdown of natural human bonds and the ultimate violation of societal norms, making the suffering depicted even more poignant and shocking. This detail underscores the profound tragedy and the severity of the judgment.

Why are priests and prophets mentioned specifically as being slain in the sanctuary?

Answer: The mention of priests (H3548, kôhên) and prophets (H5030, nâbîyʼ) being slain in the sanctuary (H4720, miqdâsh) is highly significant for several reasons. Firstly, priests and prophets were consecrated individuals, set apart for God's service, representing the spiritual leadership of Israel. Their death, especially in the holy place, signifies the utter collapse of religious order and the removal of divine protection from even those dedicated to God. Secondly, the sanctuary was the most sacred space in Israel, the dwelling place of God's presence. Its defilement by the shedding of blood, particularly of holy persons, represents the ultimate act of sacrilege and the complete abandonment of Jerusalem by God's protective presence, a direct consequence of the people's persistent sin and idolatry, as prophesied in Ezekiel 8:6. It underscores the profound judgment that spared no one and no place, however sacred.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Lamentations 2:20, with its depiction of ultimate suffering, sacrilege, and divine judgment, finds its profound Christ-centered fulfillment not in a repetition of such horrors, but in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The unimaginable suffering of Jerusalem, particularly the innocent, points to the ultimate innocent sufferer, Jesus, who bore the full weight of God's judgment for humanity's sin on the cross. The prophet's cry, "to whom thou hast done this," finds its echo in Christ's cry, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?" (Matthew 27:46), as He became sin for us, experiencing a spiritual desolation far deeper than any physical famine. The slaying of priests and prophets in the sanctuary, a place of sacrifice and atonement, foreshadows the ultimate sacrifice of the true High Priest, Jesus, whose blood shed outside the city gates (Hebrews 13:12) cleansed not just a physical sanctuary but opened the way to the heavenly one. He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29), enduring the covenant curses so that those who believe might receive blessing. Through His death, the old temple system was made obsolete, and He became the true temple (John 2:19-21) through whom we have access to God, transforming a place of judgment into a source of grace and reconciliation. In Christ, the desperate plea for God to "consider" is answered by His ultimate act of love, providing redemption from the very judgment depicted in Lamentations.

Copy as

Commentary on Lamentations 2 verses 10–22

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Justly are these called Lamentations, and they are very pathetic ones, the expressions of grief in perfection, mourning and woe, and nothing else, like the contents of Ezekiel's roll, Eze 2:10.

I. Copies of lamentations are here presented and they are painted to the life. 1. The judges and magistrates, who used to appear in robes of state, have laid them aside, or rather are stripped of them, and put on the habit of mourners (Lam 2:10); the elders now sit no longer in the judgment-seats, the thrones of the house of David, but they sit upon the ground, having no seat to repose themselves in, or in token of great grief, as Job's friends sat with him upon the ground, Job 2:13. They open not their mouth in the gate, as usual, to give their opinion, but they keep silence, overwhelmed with grief, and not knowing what to say. They have cast dust upon their heads, and girded themselves with sackcloth, as deep mourners used to do; they had lost their power and wealth, and that made the grieve thus. Ploratur lachrymis amissa pecunia veris - Genuine are the tears which we shed over lost property. 2. The young ladies, who used to dress themselves so richly, and walk with stretched-forth necks (Isa 3:16), now are humbled; The virgins of Jerusalem hang down their heads to the ground; those are made to know sorrow who seemed to bid defiance to it and were always disposed to be merry. 3. The prophet himself is a pattern to the mourners, Lam 2:11. His eyes do fail with tears; he has wept till he can weep no more, has almost wept his eyes out, wept himself blind. Nor are the inward impressions of grief short of the outward expressions. His bowels are troubled, as they were when he saw these calamities coming (Jer 4:19, Jer 4:20), which, one would think, might have excused him now; but even he, to whom they were no surprise, felt them an insupportable grief, to such a degree that his liver is poured out on the earth; he felt himself a perfect colliquation; all his entrails were melted and dissolved, as Psa 22:14. Jeremiah himself had better treatment than his neighbours, better than he had had before from his own countrymen, nay, their destruction was his deliverance, their captivity his enlargement; the same that made them prisoners made him a favourite; and yet his private interests are swallowed up in a concern for the public, and he bewails the destruction of the daughter of his people as sensibly as if he himself had been the greatest sufferer in that common calamity. Note, The judgments of God upon the land and nation are to be lamented by us, though we, for our parts, may escape pretty well.

II. Calls to lamentation are here given: The heart of the people cried unto the Lord, Lam 2:18. Some fear it was a cry, not of true repentance, but of bitter complaint; their heart was as full of grief as it could hold, and they gave vent to it in doleful shrieks and outcries, in which they made use of God's name; yet we will charitably suppose that many of them did in sincerity cry unto God for mercy in their distress; and the prophet bids them go on to do so: "O wall of the daughter of Zion! either you that stand upon the wall, you watchmen on the walls (Isa 62:6), when you see the enemies encamped about the walls and making their approaches towards them, or because of the wall (that is the subject of the lamentation), because of the breaking down of the wall (which was not done till about a month after the city was taken), because of this further calamity, let the daughter of Zion lament still." This was a thing which Nehemiah lamented long after, Neh 1:3, Neh 1:4. "Let tears run down like a river day and night, weep without intermission, give thyself no rest from weeping, let not the apple of thy eye cease." This intimates, 1. That the calamities would be continuing, and the causes of grief would frequently recur, and fresh occasion would be given them every day and every night to bemoan themselves. 2. That they would be apt, by degrees, to grow insensible and stupid under the hand of God, and would need to be still called upon to afflict their souls yet more and more, till their proud and hard hearts were thoroughly humbled and softened.

III. Causes for lamentation are here assigned, and the calamities that are to be bewailed are very particularly and pathetically described.

1.Multitudes perish by famine, a very sore judgment, and piteous is the case of those that fall under it. God had corrected them by scarcity of provisions through want of rain some time before (Jer 14:1), and they were not brought to repentance by that lower degree of this judgment, and therefore now by the straitness of the siege God brought it upon them in extremity; for, (1.) The children died for hunger in their mothers' arms: The children and sucklings, whose innocent and helpless state entitles them to relief as soon as any, swoon in the streets (Lam 2:11) as the wounded (Lam 2:12), there being no food to be had for them; those that are starved die as surely as those that are stabbed. They lie a great while crying to their poor mothers for corn to feed them and wine to refresh them, for they are such as had been bred up to the use of wine and wanted it now; but there is none for them, so that at length their soul is poured into their mothers' bosom, and there they breathe their last. This is mentioned again (Lam 2:19): They faint for hunger in the top of every street. Yet this is not the worst, (2.) There were some little children that were slain by their mothers' hands and eaten, Lam 2:20. Such was the scarcity of provision that the women ate the fruit of their own bodies, even their children when they were but of a span long, according to the threatening, Deu 28:53. The like was done in the siege of Samaria, Kg2 6:29. Such extremities, nay, such barbarities, were they brought to by the famine. Let us, in our abundance, thank God that we have food convenient, not only for ourselves, but for our children.

2.Multitudes fall by the sword, which devours one as well as another, especially when it is in the hand of such cruel enemies as the Chaldeans were. (1.) They spared no character, no, not the most distinguished; even the priest and the prophet, who of all men, one would think, might expect protection from heaven and veneration on earth, are slain, not abroad in the field of battle, where they are out of their place, as Hophni and Phinehas, but in the sanctuary of the Lord, the place of their business and which they hoped would be a refuge to them. (2.) They spared no age, no, not those who, by reason of their tender or their decrepit age, were exempted from taking up the sword; for even they perished by the sword. "The young, who have not yet come to bear arms, and the old, who have had their discharge, lie on the ground, slain in the streets, till some kind hand is found that will bury them." (3.) They spared no sex: My virgins and my young men have fallen by the sword. In the most barbarous military executions that ever we read of the virgins were spared, and made part of the spoil (Num 31:18, Jdg 5:30), but here the virgins were put to the sword, as well as the young men. (4.) This was the Lord's doing; he suffered the sword of the Chaldeans to devour thus without distinction: Thou has slain them in the day of thy anger, for it is God that kills and makes alive, and saves alive, as he pleases. But that which follows is very harsh: Thou has killed, and not pitied; for his soul is grieved for the misery of Israel. The enemies that used them thus cruelly were such as he had both mustered and summoned (Lam 2:22): "Thou hast called in, as in a solemn day, my terrors round about, that is, the Chaldeans, who are such a terror to me;" enemies crowded into Jerusalem now as thickly as ever worshippers used to do on a solemn festival, so that they were quite overpowered with numbers, and none escaped nor remained; Jerusalem was made a perfect slaughter-house. Mothers are cut to the heart to see those whom they have taken such care of, and pains with, and whom they have been so tender of, thus inhumanly used, suddenly cut off, though not soon reared: Those that I have swaddled, and brought up, has my enemy consumed, as if they were brought forth for the murderer, like lambs for the butcher, Hos 9:13. Zion, who was a mother to them all, lamented to see those who were brought up in her courts, and under the tuition of her oracles, thus made a prey.

3.Their false prophets cheated them, Lam 2:14. This was a thing which Jeremiah had lamented long before, and had observed with a great concern (Jer 14:13): Ah! Lord God, the prophets say unto them, You shall not see the sword; and here he inserts it among his lamentations: Thy prophets have seen vain and foolish things for thee; they pretended to discover for thee, and then to discover to thee, the mind and will of God, to see the visions of the Almighty and then to speak his words; but they were all vain and foolish things; their visions were all their own fancies, and, if they thought they had any, it was only the product of a crazed head or a heated imagination, as appeared by what they delivered, which was all idle and impertinent: nay, it is most likely that they themselves knew that the visions they pretended were counterfeit, and all a sham, and made use of only to colour that which they designedly imposed upon the people with, that they might make an interest in them for themselves. They are thy prophets, not God's prophets; he never sent them, nor were they pastors after his heart, but the people set them up, told them what they should say, so that they were prophets after their hearts. (1.) Prophets should tell people of their faults, should show them their sins, that they may bring them to repentance, and so prevent their ruin; but these prophets knew that would lose them the people's affections and contributions, and knew they could not reprove their hearers without reproaching themselves at the same time, and therefore they have not discovered thy iniquity; they saw it not themselves, or, if they did, saw so little evil in it, or danger from it, that they would not tell them of it, though that might have been a means, by taking away their iniquity, to turn away their captivity. (2.) Prophets should warn people of the judgments of God coming upon them, but these saw for them false burdens; the messages they pretended to deliver to them from God they knew to be false, and falsely ascribed to God; so that, by soothing them up in carnal security, they caused that banishment which, by plain dealing, they might have prevented.

4.Their neighbours laughed at them (Lam 2:15): All that pass by thee clap their hands at thee. Jerusalem had made a great figure, got a great name, and borne a great sway, among the nations; it was the envy and terror of all about; and, when the city was thus reduced; they all (as men are apt to do in such a case) triumphed in its fall; they hissed, and wagged the head, pleasing themselves to see how much it had fallen from its former pretensions. Is this the city (said they) that men called the perfection of beauty? Psa 50:2. How is it now the perfection of deformity! Where is all its beauty now? Is this the city which was called the joy of the whole earth (Psa 48:2), which rejoiced in the gifts of God's bounty and grace more than any other place, and which all the earth rejoiced in? Where is all its joy now and all its glorying? It is a great sin thus to make a jest of others' miseries, and adds very much affliction to the afflicted.

5.Their enemies triumphed over them, Lam 2:16. Those that wished ill to Jerusalem and her peace now vent their spite and malice, which before they concealed; they now open their mouths, nay, they widen them; they hiss and gnash their teeth in scorn and indignation; they triumph in their own success against her, and the rich prey they have got in making themselves masters of Jerusalem: "We have swallowed her up; it is our doing, and it is our gain; it is all our own now. Jerusalem shall never be either courted or feared as she has been. Certainly this is the day that we have long looked for; we have found it; we have seen it; aha! so would we have it." Note, The enemies of the church are apt to take its shocks for its ruins, and to triumph in them accordingly; but they will find themselves deceived; for the gates of hell shall not prevail against the church.

6.Their God, in all this, appeared against them (Lam 2:17): The Lord has done that which he had devised. The destroyers of Jerusalem could have no power against her unless it were given them from above. They are but the sword in God's hand; it is he that has thrown down, and has not pitied. "In this controversy of his with us we have not had the usual instances of his compassion towards us." He has caused they enemy to rejoice over thee (see Job 30:11); he has set up the horn of thy adversaries, has given them power and matter for pride. This is indeed the highest aggravation of the trouble, that God has become their enemy, and yet it is the strongest argument for patience under it; we are bound to submit to what God does, for, (1.) It is the performance of his purpose: The Lord has done that which he had devised; it is done with counsel and deliberation, not rashly, or upon a sudden resolve; it is the evil that he has framed (Jer 18:11), and we may be sure it is framed so as exactly to answer the intention. What God devises against his people is designed for them, and so it will be found in the issue. (2.) It is the accomplishment of his predictions; it is the fulfilling of the scripture; he has now put in execution his word that he had commanded in the days of old. When he gave them his law by Moses he told them what judgments he would certainly inflict upon them if they transgressed that law; and now that they have been guilty of the transgression of this law he had executed the sentence of it, according to Lev 26:16, etc., Deu 28:15. Note, In all the providences of God concerning his church it is good to take notice of the fulfilling of his word; for there is an exact agreement between the judgments of God's hand and the judgments of his mouth, and when they are compared they will mutually explain and illustrate each other.

IV. Comforts for the cure of these lamentations are here sought for and prescribed.

1.They are sought for and enquired after, Lam 2:13. The prophet seeks to find out some suitable acceptable words to say to her in this case: Wherewith shall I comfort thee, O virgin! daughter of Zion? Note, We should endeavour to comfort those whose calamities we lament, and, when our passions have made the worst of them, our wisdom should correct them and labour to make the best of them; we should study to make our sympathies with or afflicted friends turn to their consolation. Now the two most common topics of comfort, in case of affliction, are here tried, but are laid by because they would not hold. We commonly endeavour to comfort our friends by telling them, (1.) That their case is not singular, nor without precedent; there are many whose trouble is greater, and lies heavier upon them, than theirs does; but Jerusalem's case will not admit this argument: "What thing shall I liken to thee, or what shall I equal to thee, that I may comfort thee? What city, what country, is there, whose case is parallel to thine? What witness shall I produce to prove an example that will reach thy present calamitous state? Alas! there is none, no sorrow like thine, because there is none whose honour was like thine." (2.) We tell them that their case is not desperate, but that it may easily be remedied; but neither will that be admitted here, upon a view of human probabilities; for thy breach is great, like the sea, like the breach which the sea sometimes makes upon the land, which cannot be repaired, but still grows wider and wider. Thou art wounded, and who shall heal thee? No wisdom nor power of man can repair the desolations of such a broken shattered state. It is to no purpose therefore to administer any of these common cordials; therefore,

2.The method of cure prescribed is to address themselves to God, and by a penitent prayer to commit their case to him, and to be instant and constant in such prayers (Lam 2:19): "Arise out of thy dust, out of thy despondency, cry out in the night, watch unto prayer; when others are asleep, be thou upon thy knees, importunate with God for mercy; in the beginning of the watches, of each of the four watches, of the night (let thy eyes prevent them, Psa 119:148), then pour out thy heart like water before the Lord, be free and full in prayer, be sincere and serious in prayer, open thy mind, spread thy case before the Lord; lift up thy hands towards him in holy desire and expectation; beg for the life of thy young children. These poor lambs, what have they done? Sa2 24:17. Take with you words, take with you these words (Lam 2:20), Behold, O Lord! and consider to whom thou hast done this, with whom thou hast dealt thus. Are they not thy own, the seed of Abraham thy friend and of Jacob thy chosen? Lord, take their case into thy compassionate consideration!" Note, Prayer is a salve for every sore, even the sorest, a remedy for every malady, even the most grievous. And our business in prayer is not to prescribe, but to subscribe to the wisdom and will of God; to refer our case to him, and then to leave it with him. Lord, behold and consider, and thy will be done.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 10–22. Public domain.
Copy as
Thomas AquinasAD 1274
Prayer in itself here is viewed. First, divine mercy is called forth, as to an inhumanity in punishment; second, as to its universality. Verse 21 later so states: "In the dust of the streets lie the young and the old."

Third, prayer is called forth regarding possibility of escape. Thus, Verse 22 says: "Thou didst invite as to the day of an appointed feast my terrors on every side."

Regarding inhumanity in punishment two more ideas are proposed. First, is the attention: "with whom thou hast dealt thus?" This states, as if, no other person except me, for they are elected from the fathers, or elders. For Chapter 1:12 says: "which the Lord inflicted on the day of his fierce anger."

Second is considered inhumanity of punishment counter to national piety. Since, Verse 20 asks: "should women eat their offspring, the children of their tender care?" This asks, as if, will you (O Lord) ever sustain this (situation). For, it is read that such a situation is fulfilled in the blockade of the Romans against Joseph (son of Jacob and Rachel) of Egypt. (cf: Also, Chapters 5-7, Book of 2 Kings (4 Kings), ("The Siege of Samaria by the Syrians."). Also, it is stated in Chapter 4:10: "The hands of compassionate women have boiled their own children; they became their food in the destruction of the daughter of my people."

Then, there is inhumanity even counter to honesty, and integrity of religion itself. So expressed in Verse 20: "Should priest and prophet be slain in the sanctuary of the Lord?" Which states, as if: Will you ever sustain what is murdered? And, as the prophet Ezekiel 9:6 declares: "but touch no one upon whom is the mark. And begin at my sanctuary."
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Lamentations 2:20 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.