Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Therefore said they unto him, How were thine eyes opened?
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Therefore G3767 said they G3004 unto him G846, How G4459 were G455 thine G4675 eyes G3788 opened G455?
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
“How were your eyes opened?” they asked him.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
“How then were your eyes opened?” they asked.
Ask
American Standard Version
They said therefore unto him, How then were thine eyes opened?
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
They therefore were asking him, “How were your eyes opened?”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Therefore they sayd vnto him, Howe were thine eyes opened?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
They said, therefore, to him, `How were thine eyes opened?'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All John Sites (Jerusalem)
All John Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
Jesus' Third Journey from Galilee to Jerusalem
Jesus' Third Journey from Galilee to Jerusalem View full PDF
All John Sites (Levant)
All John Sites (Levant) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 26,451 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

John 9:10 captures the immediate, incredulous reaction of the crowd to the miraculous healing of a man born blind. Having recognized him, their astonishment transitions from debating his identity to a direct, probing question about the method of his sight's restoration, revealing a deep human need to comprehend the inexplicable, even when confronted with undeniable divine power.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is a pivotal moment following the dramatic healing recounted in John 9:1-7. Jesus, encountering a man blind from birth, performs a unique healing by anointing his eyes with mud and instructing him to wash in the Pool of Siloam. The man's obedience results in immediate sight. The narrative then shifts in John 9:8-9 to the reaction of his neighbors and acquaintances, who are utterly perplexed and divided over whether this is truly the same beggar they knew. Verse 10 marks the point where their confusion over his identity gives way to a direct interrogation about the how of his transformation, setting the stage for the subsequent confrontations with the religious authorities and the man's developing testimony.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Blindness in ancient Israel was often associated with sin or divine judgment, as seen in the disciples' initial question in John 9:2. A person born blind was considered beyond human help, making this miracle particularly profound. The healing also occurred on the Sabbath, a detail that becomes a major point of contention for the Pharisees throughout the chapter, as they strictly interpreted the Mosaic Law regarding work on the Sabbath (Exodus 20:8-11). The public nature of the man's former begging would have made him a well-known figure, intensifying the community's shock and skepticism when confronted with his restored sight.
  • Key Themes: John 9:10 significantly contributes to several key themes within the Gospel of John. Firstly, it highlights the Nature of Miracles as undeniable, supernatural acts that defy natural explanation, thus demanding a response. The question "How were thine eyes opened?" underscores the extraordinary nature of the event. Secondly, it exemplifies Skepticism and Inquiry as a common human reaction to divine intervention; rather than immediate faith, the crowd's first impulse is doubt and a demand for a rational account. This sets up the repeated interrogations the man will face. Thirdly, the man's simple reply in John 9:11 initiates the theme of Witness and Testimony, as his personal experience becomes a powerful, albeit challenged, witness to Jesus' power. Finally, the physical healing serves as a potent metaphor for Spiritual vs. Physical Sight, foreshadowing the deeper spiritual insight the man will gain in contrast to the spiritual blindness of the religious leaders, a theme Jesus explicitly addresses later in the chapter (John 9:39-41).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • said (Greek, légō', G3004): A primary verb, properly meaning to "lay forth" or relate in words, often implying systematic or set discourse. Here, it signifies the crowd's deliberate and direct verbal inquiry, moving beyond mere observation or debate to a focused interrogation of the man himself.
  • eyes (Greek, ophthalmós', G3788): From ὀπτάνομαι, referring to the physical organ of sight. In this context, it highlights the undeniable physical transformation—the restoration of vision—that is the immediate cause of the crowd's astonishment and their subsequent question. The focus is on the tangible reality of the miracle.
  • opened (Greek, anoígō', G455): From ἀνά and (to open), meaning to open up, whether literally or figuratively. The KJV's "were opened" accurately reflects the Greek aorist passive indicative, emphasizing that the action was performed upon the man, not by his own effort or will. This grammatical construction underscores the external, divine agency of the miracle, making the "How?" question even more profound as it points to the source of such extraordinary power.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Therefore said they unto him": This phrase marks a logical progression from the preceding verses, where the neighbors and acquaintances debated the man's identity. "Therefore" indicates that their question is a direct consequence of their recognition and bewilderment. The "they" refers to the collective group of people who knew the man, whose collective astonishment compels them to shift from internal debate to direct confrontation and inquiry. Their statement is not casual but driven by profound incredulity.
  • "How were thine eyes opened?": This is the core of the verse, an interrogative statement that reveals the crowd's utter disbelief and their demand for an explanation. It acknowledges the undeniable fact of his restored sight ("thine eyes opened") while simultaneously expressing their inability to comprehend the method or means by which such an impossible event occurred. The passive voice ("were opened") inherently points to an external agent, prompting the inquiry into the identity and power of that agent, which will drive the rest of the chapter's narrative.

Literary Devices

John 9:10 employs several significant literary devices. The most prominent is Interrogation, as the entire verse is framed as a direct question, reflecting the human impulse to seek rational explanations for the supernatural. This question serves as a narrative catalyst, propelling the story forward into a series of interrogations by various groups. There is also a subtle layer of Irony at play: those with physical sight are spiritually blind to the divine power before them, while the physically blind man is on the path to spiritual insight. The "opening of eyes" itself functions as powerful Symbolism, representing not only physical healing but also the spiritual enlightenment that comes through encountering Jesus, the Light of the World.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

John 9:10 underscores humanity's struggle to reconcile the supernatural with the natural, often leading to skepticism rather than immediate faith. The crowd's demand for "how" mirrors a broader human tendency to seek explanations that fit within existing frameworks, even when confronted with evidence of divine intervention. Theologically, this highlights the often-unpredictable nature of God's work, which frequently transcends human comprehension and challenges preconceived notions about divine power and its manifestation. The question itself, while born of doubt, inadvertently serves to magnify the miracle's impact by forcing an explanation that points directly to Jesus.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

John 9:10 serves as a powerful mirror for our own reactions when confronted with God's extraordinary work, whether in the world or in our personal lives. Do we, like the crowd, immediately default to skepticism and a demand for a rational, explainable "how," or do we approach such divine interventions with a posture of wonder and a willingness to believe beyond our current understanding? The man born blind, despite the relentless questioning, stands firm in his simple testimony, demonstrating that personal experience with Jesus is a powerful, unassailable witness. This verse challenges us to move beyond mere intellectual curiosity about God's power to a deeper engagement that fosters faith and prompts us to share our own stories of transformation, even when met with disbelief or scrutiny. Our personal encounters with Christ, however simple, are potent testimonies to His ongoing work.

Questions for Reflection

  • When faced with something extraordinary or seemingly inexplicable, what is your immediate reaction? Do you seek to understand, or do you quickly dismiss it?
  • How does the crowd's skepticism in this passage challenge or affirm your own approach to faith and miracles?
  • In what ways might your own "eyes" (physical or spiritual) need to be opened by Jesus today?
  • What is your "how" — the simple, personal testimony of how Jesus has worked in your life — that you might be called to share, even when questioned?

FAQ

Why was the crowd so focused on "how" the man's eyes were opened, rather than simply celebrating his healing?

Answer: The question "How?" reflects a natural human tendency to seek rational explanations for extraordinary events, especially those that defy common experience and medical understanding. For a man born blind, his condition was considered incurable, making his sudden sight profoundly unsettling and unbelievable to those who knew him. Their focus on the method of healing, rather than immediate celebration, indicates their deep bewilderment and perhaps a subconscious desire to fit this miracle into a comprehensible framework. This inquiry also sets the stage for the deeper theological and legal interrogations that follow, particularly concerning Jesus' actions on the Sabbath, which the religious authorities will later scrutinize as a violation of their laws (John 9:16).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

John 9:10, with its focus on the "how" of the blind man's healing, powerfully foreshadows the ultimate work of Christ in opening not just physical eyes, but spiritual ones. Jesus had already declared Himself to be the light of the world, and His healing of the blind man is a tangible demonstration of this claim. Just as the crowd struggled to comprehend the physical miracle, humanity often struggles to grasp the spiritual transformation offered by Christ. Through His death and resurrection, Jesus provides the means for humanity to be delivered from the spiritual blindness of sin and unbelief, enabling them to see God's truth and glory. As Paul writes in 2 Corinthians, "For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ." The man's journey from physical blindness to sight, and then to spiritual insight and worship of Jesus (John 9:38), serves as a profound parable for the saving work of Christ, who continually opens the eyes of those who were once spiritually blind, bringing them into His marvelous light (1 Peter 2:9).

Copy as

Commentary on John 9 verses 8–12

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Such a wonderful event as the giving of sight to a man born blind could not but be the talk of the town, and many heeded it no more than they do other town-talk, that is but nine days' wonder; but here we are told what the neighbours said of it, for the confirmation of the matter of fact. That which at first was not believed without scrutiny may afterwards be admitted without scruple. Two things are debated in this conference about it: -

I. Whether this was the same man that had before been blind, Joh 9:8.

1.The neighbours that lived near the place where he was born and bred, and knew that he had been blind, could not but be amazed when they saw that he had his eye-sight, had it on a sudden, and perfectly; and they said, Is not this he that sat and begged? It seems, this blind man was a common beggar, being disabled to work for his living; and so discharged from the obligation of the law, that if any would not work, neither should he eat. When he could not go about, he sat; if we cannot work for God, we must sit still quietly for him. When he could not labour, his parents not being able to maintain him, he begged. Note, Those who cannot otherwise subsist must not, like the unjust steward, be ashamed to beg; let no man be ashamed of anything but sin. There are some common beggars that are objects of charity, that should be distinguished; and we must not let the bees starve for the sake of the drones or wasps that are among them. As to this man, (1.) It was well ordered by Providence that he on whom this miracle was wrought should be a common beggar, and so generally known and remarkable, by which means the truth of the miracle was better attested, and there were more to witness against those infidel Jews who would not believe that he had been blind than if he had been maintained in his father's house. (2.) It was the greater instance of Christ's condescension that he seemed (as I may say) to take more pains about the cure of a common beggar than of others. When it was for the advantage of his miracles that they should be wrought on those that were remarkable, he pitched upon those that were made so by their poverty and misery; not by their dignity.

2.In answer to this inquiry, (1.) Some said, This is he, the very same man; and these are witnesses to the truth of the miracle, for they had long known him stone-blind. (2.) Others, who could not think it possible that a man born blind should thus on a sudden receive his sight, for that reason, and no other, said, He is not he, but is like him, and so, by their confession, if it be he, it is a great miracle that is wrought upon him. Hence we may take occasion to think, [1.] Of the wisdom and power of Providence in ordering such a universal variety of the faces of men and women, so that no two are so alike but that they may be distinguished, which is necessary to society, and commerce, and the administration of justice. And, [2.] Of the wonderful change which the converting grace of God makes upon some who before were very wicked and vile, but are thereby so universally and visibly altered that one would not take them to be the same persons.

3.This controversy was soon decided by the man himself: He said, I am he, the very man that so lately sat and begged; "I am he that was blind, and was an object of the charity of men, but now see, and am a monument of the mercy and grace of God." We do not find that the neighbours appealed to him in this matter, but he, hearing the debate, interposed, and put an end to it. It is a piece of justice we owe to our neighbours to rectify their mistakes, and to set things before them, as far as we are able, in a true light. Applying it spiritually, it teaches us that those who are savingly enlightened by the grace of God should be ready to own what they were before that blessed change was wrought, Ti1 1:13, Ti1 1:14.

II. How he came to have his eyes opened, Joh 9:10-12. They will now turn aside, and see this great sight, and enquire further concerning it. He did not sound a trumpet when he did these alms, nor perform his cures upon a stage; and yet, like a city upon a hill, they could not be hid. Two things these neighbours enquire after: -

1.The manner of the cure: How were thine eyes opened? The works of the Lord being great, they ought to be sought out, Psa 111:2. It is good to observe the way and method of God's works, and they will appear the more wonderful. We may apply it spiritually; it is strange that blind eyes should be opened, but more strange when we consider how they are opened; how weak the means are that are used, and how strong the opposition that is conquered. In answer to this enquiry the poor man gives them a plain and full account of the matter: A man that is called Jesus made clay, - and I received sight. Joh 9:11. Note, Those who have experienced special instances of God's power and goodness, in temporal or spiritual things, should be ready upon all occasions to communicate their experiences, for the glory of God and the instruction and encouragement of others. See David's collection of his experiences, his own and others', Psa 34:4-6. It is a debt we owe to our benefactor, and to our brethren. God's favours are lost upon us, when they are lost with us, and go no further.

2.The author of it (Joh 9:12): Where is he? Some perhaps asked this question out of curiosity. "Where is he, that we may see him?" A man that did such cures as these might well be a show, which one would go a good way for the sight of. Others, perhaps, asked out of ill-will. "Where is he, that we may seize him?" There was a proclamation out for the discovering and apprehending of him (Joh 11:57); and the unthinking crowd, in spite of all reason and equity, will have ill thoughts of those that are put into an ill name. Some, we hope, asked this question out of good-will. "Where is he, that we may be acquainted with him? Where is he, that we may come to him, and share in the favours he is so free of?" In answer to this, he could say nothing: I know not. As soon as Christ had sent him to the pool of Siloam, it should seem, he withdrew immediately (as he did, Joh 5:13), and did not stay till the man returned, as if he either doubted of the effect or waited for the man's thanks. Humble souls take more pleasure in doing good than in hearing of it again; it will be time enough to hear of it in the resurrection of the just. The man had never seen Jesus, for by the time that he had gained his sight he had lost his Physician; and he asked, it is probable, Where is he? None of all the new and surprising objects that presented themselves could be so grateful to him as one sight of Christ, but as yet he knew no more of him than that he was called, and rightly called, Jesus - a Saviour. Thus in the work of grace wrought upon the soul we see the change, but see not the hand that makes it; for the way of the Spirit is like that of the wind, which thou hearest the sound of, but canst not tell whence it comes nor whither it goes.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 8–12. Public domain.
Copy as
Ephrem the SyrianAD 373
COMMENTARY ON TATIAN’S DIATESSARON 16.30
Those who could see were clearly being drawn to the blind man, who saw inwardly. The blind man was being drawn secretly to those who could see but who were blind inwardly. He [the blind man] washed away the clay from his eyes and appeared to himself. They washed the blindness from their hearts and gained approval for themselves. When our Lord opened up the eyes of one blind man clearly in that moment, he opened up [the eyes of] many blind people secretly. For that blind man was [surely] blind. He was like a source of profit for our Lord, for by him our Lord acquired many blind people [by healing them] from the blindness of their heart.
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on the Gospel of John 57
"They said unto him, How were thine eyes opened? He answered and said, A man that is called Jesus." What sayest thou? Doth "a man" work such deeds? As yet he knew nothing great concerning Him. "A man that is called Jesus made clay, and anointed mine eyes." Observe how truthful he is. He saith not whence He made it, for he speaks not of what he doth not know; he saw not that He spat on the ground, but that He spread it on he knew from sense and touch. "And said unto me, Go, wash in the pool of Siloam." This too his hearing witnessed to him. But how did he recognize His voice? From His conversation with the disciples. And saying all this, and having received the witness by the works, the manner (of the cure) he cannot tell. Now if faith is needed in matters which are felt and handled, much more in the case of things invisible.
John Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 407
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(Hom. lvii. s. 2) He was not ashamed of his former blindness, nor afraid of the fury of the people, nor averse to show himself, and proclaim his Benefactor. Therefore said they unto him, How were thine eyes opened? How they were, neither he nor any one knew: he only knew the fact; he could not explain it. He answered and said, A man that is called Jesus made clay, and anointed mine eyes. Mark his exactness. He does not say how the clay was made; for he could not see that our Lord spat on the ground; he does not say what he does not know; but that He anointed him he could feel. And said unto me, Go to the pool of Siloam, and wash. This too he could declare from his own hearing; for he had heard our Lord converse with His disciples, and so knew His voice. Lastly, he shows how strictly he had obeyed our Lord. He adds, And I went, and washed, and received sight.
Augustine of HippoAD 430
Tractates on John 44
"The neighbors therefore, and those who saw him previously, for he was a beggar, said, Is not this he who sat and begged? Some said, It is he: others, No; but he is like him." The opening of his eyes had altered his countenance. "He said, I am he." His voice utters its gratitude, that it might not be condemned as ungrateful. "Therefore said they unto him, How were thine eyes opened? He answered, The man who is called Jesus made clay, and anointed mine eyes, and said unto me, Go to the pool of Siloam, and wash: and I went and washed, and saw." See, he is become the herald of grace; see, he preaches the gospel; endowed with sight, he becomes a confessor. That blind man makes confession, and the heart of the wicked was troubled; for they had not in their heart what he had now in his countenance.
Cyril of AlexandriaAD 444
Commentary on the Gospel of John, Book 6
With difficulty they consent to believe that he was the same man whom they had known aforetime, and abandoning their hesitation on this point, they ask how he had got rid of his blindness, and what was the manner of such an unhoped-for event. For it seems usual for those who are astonished to make careful inquiries and to investigate the manner of what has been done; and these persons resolved to do the same, not without the guidance of God, in our opinion, but in order that even unwillingly they might learn the power of Our Saviour from the narration and clear announcement which the blind man made to them. This thou mayest accept as a beautiful type of the converts from among the Gentiles becoming teachers to the people of Israel, after escaping from their former blindness and receiving the illumination which comes from Our Saviour Christ through the Spirit. And that what we have said is true, the events themselves will loudly proclaim.
Gregory the Dialogist (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 604
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(viii. Moral. c. xxx. [49.]) Or thus: By His spittle understand the savour of inward contemplation. It runs down from the head into the mouth, and gives us the taste of revelation from the Divine splendour even in this life. The mixture of His spittle with clay is the mixture of supernatural grace, even the contemplation of Himself with our carnal knowledge, to the soul's enlightenment, and restoration of the human understanding from its original blindness.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying John 9:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.