


John 9:26
Bible Versions
Then said they to him again, What did he to thee? how opened he thine eyes?
So they said to him, “What did he do to you? How did he open your eyes?”
“What did He do to you?” they asked. “How did He open your eyes?”
They said therefore unto him, What did he to thee? how opened he thine eyes?
No cross-references found for this verse.
John 9:26 finds the religious authorities, specifically the Pharisees, continuing their intense interrogation of the man who was born blind and miraculously healed by Jesus. This verse highlights their persistent skepticism and their repeated attempts to discredit the miracle and the one who performed it.
Context
This verse is part of the broader narrative in John chapter 9, which details Jesus' compassionate healing of a man born blind. After Jesus used clay and spit to anoint the man's eyes and instructed him to wash in the Pool of Siloam (John 9:6-7), the man received his sight. This astonishing event immediately sparked controversy, primarily because the healing occurred on the Sabbath, a day when such work was forbidden by the Pharisees' interpretation of the law.
The man had already given his simple, factual testimony multiple times (John 9:11, John 9:15). Despite this, and having already questioned his parents who confirmed his birth blindness (John 9:18-23), the Pharisees called the man back a second time (John 9:24). Their repeated questions in verse 26 — "What did he to thee? how opened he thine eyes?" — reveal their frustration, their inability to deny the obvious miracle, and their desperate search for an inconsistency or a reason to condemn Jesus.
Key Themes
Linguistic Insights
The Greek phrase "Τί σοι ἐποίησεν;" (Ti soi epoiēsen?) meaning "What did he do to you?" and "πῶς ἤνοιξέν σου τοὺς ὀφθαλμούς;" (pōs ēnoixen sou tous ophthalmos?) meaning "how did he open your eyes?" are straightforward questions. The repetition indicates a probing, almost badgering tone. There's no complex linguistic nuance here beyond the direct meaning, but the emphasis is on their desire for a *method* that could be explained away or deemed unlawful, rather than simply accepting the *fact* of the miracle.
Reflection and Application
John 9:26 serves as a powerful reminder that even in the face of undeniable evidence, some will choose to remain in skepticism or opposition. For us, this verse encourages: