Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
If I have seen any perish for want of clothing, or any poor without covering;
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
If I have seen H7200 any perish H6 for want of clothing H3830, or any poor H34 without covering H3682;
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
or if I saw a traveler needing clothing, someone in need who had no covering,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
if I have seen one perish for lack of clothing, or a needy man without a cloak,
Ask
American Standard Version
If I have seen any perish for want of clothing, Or that the needy had no covering;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
if I have seen any perish for want of clothing, or that the needy had no covering;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
If I haue seene any perish for want of clothing, or any poore without couering,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
If I see any perishing without clothing, And there is no covering to the needy,
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Job 31:19 serves as a powerful declaration within Job's climactic oath of integrity, where he asserts his blamelessness before God and his accusers. This verse specifically highlights Job's active and unwavering compassion towards the most vulnerable, stating that he never ignored or failed to provide for those in extreme destitution, particularly the poor who were literally perishing from lack of clothing or covering. It stands as compelling evidence of his profound commitment to social justice and practical righteousness, underscoring that his suffering was not a consequence of unconfessed sin or neglect of the needy.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Job 31 forms the powerful culmination of Job's final defense, immediately preceding the divine speeches from the whirlwind. It is meticulously structured as an "oath of purgation" or "negative confession," a legal and theological device common in the ancient Near East. In this form, Job systematically enumerates various sins he has not committed, effectively daring God to find fault in his conduct and inviting divine judgment if his claims are false. This chapter moves beyond a mere denial of overt wickedness, asserting a deep, internal commitment to righteousness that permeated every facet of his life—from his thoughts and desires (vv. 1-12) to his treatment of servants (vv. 13-15), and crucially, to his profound care for the vulnerable. Verses 16-23 specifically detail Job's ethical responsibilities towards the marginalized, with verse 19 serving as a poignant affirmation of his active empathy and tangible provision for the poor, demonstrating that his piety was not merely ritualistic but profoundly practical and compassionate.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In the ancient Near East (ANE), the care and protection of the poor, widows, orphans, and the marginalized were paramount ethical and religious duties, frequently enshrined in legal codes (e.g., the Code of Hammurabi) and wisdom literature. Wealthy and influential individuals, like Job, were expected to embody these ethical standards, reflecting a societal and divine concern for justice and equity. Clothing was far more than a matter of modesty; it was a fundamental necessity for survival, providing critical protection against the harsh extremes of weather, from the scorching desert sun to the freezing night temperatures. To "perish for want of clothing" or be "without covering" implied the most extreme form of destitution and vulnerability, often leading to death from exposure, disease, or profound shame. Job's solemn declaration, therefore, speaks directly to a deeply ingrained cultural expectation and a profound understanding of human dignity and the critical role of basic provisions within his society.
  • Key Themes: This verse profoundly contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Job and broader biblical theology. It powerfully emphasizes Practical Compassion and Social Justice, demonstrating that true righteousness extends beyond mere ritual observance or personal piety to tangible, active care for the vulnerable and marginalized. Job's actions vividly illustrate a profound sense of Integrity and Blamelessness, aligning perfectly with the initial description of him as "blameless and upright, one who feared God and turned away from evil" in Job 1:1. His willingness to invite divine scrutiny based on his treatment of the poor underscores the theme of Divine Accountability, where human actions, especially towards the marginalized, are seen as directly related to one's relationship with God. This resonates deeply with principles found throughout the wisdom literature, such as the teaching that "Whoever oppresses a poor man insults his Maker, but he who is generous to the needy honors him" and the prophetic call to "share your bread with the hungry and bring the homeless poor into your house".

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Perish (Hebrew, ʼâbad', H6): This primitive root, H6, signifies more than just physical death. It denotes a state of utter ruin, being lost, wandering away, or extreme suffering leading to destruction. In this context, Job's assertion is that he actively intervened to prevent individuals from reaching this ultimate point of ruin or being utterly undone due to their desperate circumstances. It highlights the severe, life-threatening consequences faced by those lacking basic necessities.
  • Clothing (Hebrew, lᵉbûwsh', H3830): H3830 refers to a garment or attire in general. In the ancient world, clothing was indispensable for protection against the elements (heat, cold, rain, wind) and for maintaining personal dignity and modesty. Its absence or inadequacy was a clear indicator of extreme poverty and vulnerability, often leading to exposure and shame.
  • Covering (Hebrew, kᵉçûwth', H3682): Derived from the verb "to cover," refers to a protective garment, cloak, or blanket. While often synonymous with "clothing," its inclusion here emphasizes a comprehensive provision of warmth, shelter, and dignity, particularly against the chill of night or harsh weather. Together with "clothing," it paints a complete picture of the basic human needs Job claims to have met.

Verse Breakdown

  • "If I have seen any perish for want of clothing": Job initiates this clause with a conditional "If," characteristic of his oath of purgation, implying a challenge or an invitation for scrutiny. He solemnly declares that he has never observed anyone in such a dire state of destitution—on the brink of death or utter ruin due to a lack of proper attire—without taking compassionate action. This indicates not merely passive non-participation in injustice, but an active, observant awareness of suffering and a proactive commitment to intervention.
  • "or any poor without covering;": This second clause functions as a powerful synonymous parallelism, reinforcing and expanding upon the first statement. It reiterates Job's unwavering claim that he never encountered a truly impoverished individual (Hebrew: ʼebyôwn, H34, denoting one who is destitute and needy) lacking the fundamental necessity of a protective garment or blanket without providing for them. The repetition underscores the depth and consistency of his compassion, demonstrating that his charitable acts were comprehensive and unwavering towards the most vulnerable members of society.

Literary Devices

Job 31:19 masterfully employs several literary devices that amplify its meaning and emotional impact. The most evident is Parallelism, specifically synonymous parallelism, where the second clause, "or any poor without covering," reiterates and reinforces the meaning of the first clause, "If I have seen any perish for want of clothing," using different but closely related terms. This technique not only adds emphasis and completeness to Job's declaration of compassion but also highlights the comprehensive nature of his care. The entire chapter, including this verse, functions as a Negative Confession or Oath of Purgation, a profound legal and theological device in which the speaker solemnly declares their innocence by listing actions they have not committed, often inviting divine judgment if their claims are false. This structure lends immense weight, sincerity, and legal gravity to Job's words. Furthermore, there is an implied Rhetorical Question or challenge within the "If I have..." construction, as Job effectively dares God or his accusers to find any fault in his conduct regarding the poor, thereby underscoring his profound confidence in his own righteousness and integrity. Finally, the vivid imagery of individuals "perishing" and being "without covering" evokes a strong sense of Pathos, appealing powerfully to the listener's emotions and highlighting the profound vulnerability and desperate plight of the destitute, which in turn magnifies the moral and spiritual impact of Job's compassionate response.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Job 31:19 articulates a profound biblical truth: genuine righteousness is not merely the absence of sin, but the active, tangible pursuit of justice and mercy, particularly towards the most vulnerable members of society. Job's unwavering commitment to providing for the unclothed poor reflects a divine standard of care that permeates the entirety of Scripture. God's own character is consistently revealed as one who champions the cause of the oppressed, hears the cry of the needy, and provides for the destitute. Therefore, human compassion for the marginalized is presented as a direct imitation of divine character and a tangible, undeniable expression of authentic faith. Job's integrity, powerfully demonstrated through his practical acts of charity, serves as a compelling model for how one's inner piety and fear of God translate into outward, ethical living, connecting directly to the heart of God's law and the consistent prophetic calls for social justice and equitable treatment of all.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Job 31:19 stands as a timeless and deeply challenging mirror for believers in every generation. It compels us to move beyond a passive or minimalist understanding of righteousness—simply avoiding wrongdoing—to an active, empathetic, and tangible engagement with the suffering of others. Job did not wait to be asked; he "saw" those perishing and responded with immediate, practical aid, providing essential "clothing" and "covering." This challenges us to cultivate a heightened awareness of the myriad needs around us, whether they manifest as physical destitution, emotional isolation, spiritual brokenness, or systemic injustice. Our faith is not meant to be confined to private devotion but is designed to be lived out tangibly, demonstrating love not merely in word or sentiment but "in deed and in truth." Just as Job understood the profound impact of basic provisions on human dignity and survival, we are called to identify and address the contemporary equivalents of "clothing and covering"—shelter for the homeless, nutritious food for the hungry, accessible medical care for the sick, quality education for the unlearned, and compassionate presence for the lonely and grieving. Our proactive, loving response to the vulnerable is a direct and profound reflection of our authentic walk with God and our understanding of His heart.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does Job's active compassion and willingness to intervene challenge my current understanding of righteousness and what it truly means to "fear God"?
  • What "perishing" or "uncovered" needs in my immediate community, workplace, or sphere of influence am I called to actively "see" and address with practical aid and compassionate action?
  • In what specific ways can I move beyond merely avoiding sin to an active, intentional, and consistent pursuit of good, justice, and mercy, as Job so powerfully demonstrated?

FAQ

Was Job's declaration of innocence boastful or self-righteous?

Answer: Job's declaration in Job 31:19, and indeed throughout the entire chapter, is not an act of boastful self-righteousness in the modern, pejorative sense. Instead, it functions as a solemn "oath of purgation" or "negative confession," a recognized legal and theological device within the ancient Near Eastern context. Accused by his friends of hidden sin as the cause of his immense suffering, Job appeals directly to God, inviting divine scrutiny and judgment based on his life's conduct. He is not claiming absolute perfection or moral infallibility, but rather asserting his integrity and blamelessness concerning the specific charges leveled against him—namely, that his suffering must be due to unconfessed wickedness. His detailed enumeration of ethical behaviors, including his profound care for the poor and vulnerable, serves as compelling evidence that his suffering is not a just consequence of personal wrongdoing, thereby upholding his blameless character as initially described in Job 1:1.

How does this verse relate to the broader message of the book of Job?

Answer: Job 31:19 is absolutely crucial to the book's central message by powerfully reinforcing Job's unwavering character and directly challenging the simplistic, rigid retribution theology espoused by his friends. The friends operate under the premise that suffering is always a direct consequence of sin. Job's detailed self-defense, particularly his active and comprehensive compassion for the poor and vulnerable, irrefutably demonstrates that his suffering is not a result of personal wickedness or neglect of his moral duties. This verse, therefore, helps to establish the central theological problem of the book: why does a truly righteous person suffer? It underscores that true piety involves not just ritual observance or personal morality, but a profound commitment to social justice and active care for the marginalized. By proving his righteousness in these practical ways, Job sets the stage for God's ultimate vindication and the revelation of a more complex divine wisdom that transcends human understanding of cause and effect.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Job's compassionate provision for the "perishing" and "uncovered" poor in Job 31:19 finds its ultimate fulfillment and perfect embodiment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. While Job acted out of personal integrity and adherence to the ethical demands of the Law, Jesus's entire life was the very incarnation of divine compassion and perfect righteousness. He not only identified deeply with the poor and marginalized but voluntarily "became poor, so that by his poverty you might become rich" (2 Corinthians 8:9), taking on human flesh and experiencing human vulnerability in its fullness. Jesus consistently demonstrated practical compassion throughout His ministry, miraculously feeding the hungry crowds (Matthew 14:13-21), healing the sick and afflicted (Luke 4:40), and offering spiritual "covering" and restoration for those lost in sin and shame. His profound teaching in Matthew 25:31-46 explicitly links acts of mercy towards "the least of these" directly to serving Christ Himself, making our compassion for the vulnerable a direct response to and participation in His ongoing redemptive work. Ultimately, Christ provides the perfect "covering" for our spiritual nakedness and destitution through His atoning sacrifice on the cross, clothing us with His perfect righteousness (Romans 3:21-26) and offering eternal life, thereby fulfilling humanity's deepest need for dignity, protection, reconciliation with God, and everlasting salvation.

Copy as

Commentary on Job 31 verses 16–23

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Eliphaz had particularly charged Job with unmercifulness to the poor (Job 22:6, etc.): Thou hast withholden bread from the hungry, stripped the naked of their clothing, and sent widows away empty. One would think he could not have been so very positive and express in his charge unless there had been some truth in it, some ground, for it; and yet it appears, by Job's protestation, that it was utterly false and groundless; he was never guilty of any such thing. See here,

I. The testimony which Job's conscience gave in concerning his constant behaviour towards the poor. He enlarges most upon this head because in this matter he was most particularly accused. He solemnly protests,

1.That he had never been wanting to do good to them, as there was occasion, to the utmost of his ability. He was always compassionate to the poor, and careful of them, especially the widows and fatherless, that were destitute of help. (1.) He was always ready to grant their desires and answer their expectations, Job 31:16. If a poor person begged a kindness of his, he was ready to gratify him; if he could but perceive by the widow's mournful craving look that she expected an alms from him, though she had not confidence enough to ask it, he had compassion enough to give it, and never caused the eyes of the widow to fail. (2.) He put a respect upon the poor, and did them honour; for he took the fatherless children to eat with him at his own table: they should fare as he fared, and be familiar with him, and he would show himself pleased with their company as if they had been his own, Job 31:17. As it is one of the greatest grievances of poverty that it exposes to contempt, so it is none of the least supports to the poor to be respected. (3.) He was very tender of them, and had a fatherly concern for them, Job 31:18. He was a father to the fatherless, took care of orphans, brought them up with him under his own eye, and gave them, not only maintenance, but education. He was a guide to the widow, who had lost the guide of her youth; he advised her in her affairs, took cognizance of them, and undertook the management of them. Those that need not our alms may yet have occasion for our counsel, and it may be a real kindness to them. This Job says he did from his youth, from his mother's womb. He had something of tenderness and compassion woven in his nature; he began betimes to do good, ever since he could remember; he had always some poor widow or fatherless child under his care. His parents taught him betimes to pity and relieve the poor, and brought up orphans with him. (4.) He provided food convenient for them; they ate of the same morsels that he did (Job 31:17), did not eat after him, of the crumbs that fell from his table, but with him, of the best dish upon his table. Those that have abundance must not eat their morsels alone, as if they had none but themselves to take care of, nor indulge their appetite with a dainty bit by themselves, but take others to share with them, as David took Mephibosheth. (5.) He took particular care to clothe those that were without covering, which would be more expensive to him than feeding them, Job 31:19. Poor people may perish for want of clothing as well as for want of food - for want of clothing to lie in by night or to go abroad in by day. If Job knew of any that were in this distress, he was forward to relieve them, and instead of giving rich and gaudy liveries to his servants, while the poor were turned off with rags that were ready to be thrown to the dunghill, he had good warm strong clothes made on purpose for them of the fleece of his sheep (Job 31:20), so that their loins, whenever they girt those garments about them, blessed him; they commended his charity, blessed God for him, and prayed God to bless him. Job's sheep were burned with fire from heaven, but this was his comfort that, when he had them, he came honestly by them, and used them charitably, fed the poor with their flesh and clothed them with their wool.

2.That he had never been accessory to the wronging of any that were poor. It might be said, perhaps, that he was kind here and there to a poor orphan that was a favourite, but to others he was oppressive. No, he was tender to all and injurious to none. He never so much as lifted up his hand against the fatherless (Job 31:21), never threatened or frightened them, or offered to strike them; never used his power to crush those that stood in his way or squeeze what he could out of them, though he saw his help in the gate, that is, though he had interest enough, both in the people and in the judges, both to enable him to do it and to bear him out when he had done it. Those that have it in their power to do a wrong thing and go through with it, and a prospect of getting by it, and yet do justly, and love mercy, and are firm to both, may afterwards reflect upon their conduct with much comfort, as Job does here.

II. The imprecation with which he confirms this protestation (Job 31:22): "If I have been oppressive to the poor, let my arm fall from my shoulder-blade and my arm be broken from the bone," that is, "let the flesh rot off from the bone and one bone be disjointed and broken off from another." Had he not been perfectly clear in this matter, he durst not thus have challenged the divine vengeance. And he intimates that it is a righteous thing with God to break the arm that is lifted up against the fatherless, as he withered Jeroboam's arm that was stretched out against a prophet.

III. The principles by which Job was restrained from all uncharitableness and unmercifulness. He durst not abuse the poor; for though, with his help in the gate, he could overpower them, yet he could not make his part good against that God who is the patron of oppressed poverty and will not let oppressors go unpunished (Job 31:23): "Destruction from God was a terror to me, whenever I was tempted to this sin, and by reason of his highness I could not endure the thought of making him my enemy." He stood in awe, 1. Of the majesty of God, as a God above him. He thought of his highness, the infinite distance between him and God, which possessed him with such a reverence of him as made him very circumspect in his whole conversation. Those who oppress the poor, and pervert judgment and justice, forget that he who is higher than the highest regards, and there is a higher than they, who is able to deal with them (Ecc 5:8); but Job considered this. 2. Of the wrath of God, as a God that would certainly be against him if he should wrong the poor. Destruction from God, because it would be a certain and an utter ruin to him if he were guilty of this sin, was a constant terror to him, to restrain him from it. Note, Good men, even the best, have need to restrain themselves from sin with the fear of destruction from God, and all little enough. This should especially restrain us from all acts of injustice and oppression that God himself is the avenger thereof. Even when salvation from God is a comfort to us, yet destruction from God should be a terror to us. Adam, in innocency, was awed with a threatening.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 16–23. Public domain.
Copy as
Gregory the DialogistAD 604
MORALS ON THE BOOK OF JOB 21.19-29
Because he did not despise the poor, he displayed the virtue of humility; and he covered him out of pity. For these two virtues ought to be so linked together as to be even supported by reciprocal practice; that so neither humility, when it reverences a fellow creature, should abandon the grace of free giving, nor pity, when it gives, be made to swell high. Thus toward the need of a fellow creature, let pity sustain humility, humility sustain pity, so that when you see one who is a sharer of your own nature lacking the necessaries of life, you should neither through pitilessness cease to cover him nor from pride cease to reverence him whom you do cover. For there are persons who, the moment they are entreated for necessaries by their brothers in need, afterwards intending to bestow gifts on them, first let loose words of insult against them. These persons, though in things they execute the office of pity, yet in words lose the grace of humility, so that for the most part it seems they are now paying satisfaction for an injury inflicted when after abuse they bestow gifts. Nor is it a thing of high practice that they give the things that are begged for, because of the very boon of their giving they scarcely cover over that transgression of speech.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Job 31:19 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.