ข้ามไปยังเนื้อหา

Job 30:1

“Job's Contemptible Tormentors”· Job 30:1–8Read in context
King James Version
¶ But now they that are younger than I have me in derision, whose fathers I would have disdained to have set with the dogs of my flock.
KJV (with Strong's)
But now they that are younger H6810 H3117 than I have me in derision H7832, whose fathers H1 I would have disdained H3988 to have set H7896 with the dogs H3611 of my flock H6629.
Complete Jewish Bible
"But now those younger than I hold me in derision, men whose fathers I wouldn't even have put with the dogs that guarded my sheep.
Berean Standard Bible
“But now they mock me, men younger than I am, whose fathers I would have refused to entrust with my sheep dogs.
American Standard Version
But now they that are younger than I have me in derision, Whose fathers I disdained to set with the dogs of my flock.
World English Bible Messianic
“But now those who are younger than I have me in derision, whose fathers I would have disdained to put with my sheep dogs.
Geneva Bible (1599)
Bvt now they that are yonger then I, mocke me: yea, they whose fathers I haue refused to set with the dogges of my flockes.
Young's Literal Translation
And now, laughed at me, Have the younger in days than I, Whose fathers I have loathed to set With the dogs of my flock.
ภาษาไทย · ThaiKJV
"แต่เดี๋ยวนี้เขาเยาะข้า คือคนที่อ่อนกว่าข้าน่ะ คนที่ข้าจะเหยียดหยามพ่อของเขา ถึงกับไม่ยอมให้อยู่กับสุนัขที่เฝ้าฝูงแพะแกะของข้า
Translation

Study this verse

Summary

Job 30:1 marks a devastating turning point in Job's lament, contrasting sharply with his earlier recounting of past glory and widespread respect. Having detailed the pinnacle of his former prosperity, Job now plunges into the abyss of his current humiliation, expressing profound anguish that those significantly younger and of a lineage he once considered utterly contemptible now openly mock and deride him. This verse vividly portrays the catastrophic reversal of his social standing, setting the stage for a deeper exploration of his physical suffering and extreme social isolation.

Context

Literary Context

Job 30:1 initiates a stark and painful contrast with the preceding chapter, Job 29. In Job 29, Job meticulously details his past eminence, describing how he was revered by the community, sought for counsel, and enjoyed divine favor and abundant blessings. He recalls how "the young men saw me and hid themselves, and the aged rose and stood" (Job 29:8). This idyllic portrayal of his former life serves as a powerful backdrop against which the present degradation of Job 30:1 is magnified. The shift from universal respect to universal contempt underscores the depth of his suffering and the complete reversal of his social status, moving from a position of honor to one of utter disgrace.

Historical & Cultural Context

In the ancient Near East, age and social standing were paramount. Elders were typically accorded immense respect, wisdom, and authority, and their words carried significant weight in community affairs. To be an elder like Job, who was once a respected patriarch and judge, and then to be mocked by "younger" individuals, was an unparalleled insult. Furthermore, the comparison of the mockers' fathers to "dogs of my flock" is deeply culturally significant. Unlike modern domesticated dogs, ancient Near Eastern dogs were often wild, scavenging, and considered unclean animals, associated with impurity and contempt. They were not valued working animals like sheepdogs but rather nuisances or scavengers. To disdain setting someone with such animals indicated the lowest possible social standing, highlighting the extreme social chasm that had been inverted in Job's life.

Key Themes

This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Job. Firstly, it exemplifies the theme of Reversal of Fortune, illustrating Job's catastrophic fall from the pinnacle of honor and prosperity to the depths of social degradation. This drastic change is central to understanding the intensity of his lament and the theological questions he grapples with regarding divine justice. Secondly, it highlights the theme of Profound Humiliation. Job, a man of immense influence and respect, is now subjected to scorn by those he once considered utterly beneath him, emphasizing the extreme nature of his loss of dignity. This social shaming is as painful, if not more so, than his physical ailments. Lastly, the verse underscores Social Outcasting, as Job's former associates and even those of low status now treat him with contempt, reinforcing his isolation. This theme is further developed as Job describes his complete alienation, as seen in passages like Job 19:13-19, where he laments that God has alienated his kinsfolk and made him an outcast.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Younger tsâʻîyr' H6810

This word, derived from a root meaning "little," denotes someone who is junior in age, often implying a lack of experience, wisdom, or established social standing. In a culture where age conferred authority and respect, being mocked by those "younger" was a profound affront to Job's patriarchal status and a symbol of the complete breakdown of social order around him. It highlights the inversion of natural hierarchy, where the ignoble now deride the once-esteemed.

Derision sâchaq' H7832

This primitive root signifies to laugh, whether in pleasure or detraction, and by implication, to play. In this context, it specifically means to mock, deride, or have in derision. It implies not just mild disrespect but open contempt, insolence, and malicious amusement at another's expense. The use of sâchaq here emphasizes the active and aggressive nature of the contempt Job endures, a scornful laughter intended to strip him of dignity and status.

Dogs keleb' H3611

This term refers to a dog, and by euphemism, can also mean a male prostitute. In the ancient Near East, dogs were generally viewed with disdain. They were often wild, scavenging animals associated with impurity, disease, and the lowest social strata. They were not the revered companions or working animals of modern times. To compare someone's lineage to "dogs of my flock" (referring to wild, scavenging dogs that might follow a flock, not trained sheepdogs) was to express the utmost contempt, deeming them utterly worthless and beneath human dignity.

Verse Breakdown

"But now they that are younger than I have me in derision"

This clause marks an abrupt and painful transition from Job's glorious past to his humiliating present. The phrase "But now" (וְעַתָּה, v'attah) signals a dramatic shift in his circumstances. The core of the insult lies in the identity of his mockers: "they that are younger than I." This signifies a complete inversion of the traditional social order, where elders were revered and youth were expected to show deference. The act of "derision" (from sâchaq) implies open, scornful mockery, highlighting the public and humiliating nature of Job's suffering.

"whose fathers I would have disdained to have set with the dogs of my flock"

This second clause intensifies the humiliation by revealing the extreme social disparity between Job and his mockers' ancestors. Job states that he would have considered their fathers so utterly contemptible that he wouldn't even allow them the meager, despised role of accompanying his flock as scavengers. This is not a reference to valued sheepdogs, but to the wild, unclean, and worthless dogs that might follow a shepherd's flock for scraps. This hyperbole underscores the profound depth of Job's former contempt for their lineage, making their current position of mocking him an unbearable and ironic reversal of fortune.

Literary Devices

Job 30:1 is rich in literary devices that amplify its emotional impact and thematic significance. The most prominent device is Contrast, which is central to the entire chapter. The "But now" (וְעַתָּה) explicitly sets up a stark opposition between Job's esteemed past, as detailed in Job 29, and his current state of utter degradation. This contrast magnifies the tragedy of his fall. Hyperbole is evident in Job's declaration that he would have disdained to set the mockers' fathers with the "dogs of my flock." This exaggerated statement emphasizes the extreme lowliness of their former status in Job's eyes, making their current mockery all the more unbearable. The phrase "dogs of my flock" also functions as powerful Imagery, evoking a vivid picture of the lowest possible social standing and the perceived impurity and worthlessness of those associated with such animals in ancient culture. This imagery serves to underscore the profound social reversal and the depth of Job's humiliation.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Job 30:1 serves as a profound theological statement on the transient nature of worldly status and the vulnerability of human dignity in the face of suffering. Job's lament highlights the deep pain of social degradation, a suffering that often accompanies physical affliction but is distinct in its assault on one's identity and worth. The verse implicitly raises questions about divine justice and the apparent abandonment of the righteous, as Job, a man blameless and upright, is subjected to contempt from the lowest echelons of society. It challenges the conventional wisdom of the time, which linked prosperity to righteousness and suffering to sin, by showing an innocent man enduring the most extreme forms of social humiliation. Ultimately, Job's experience forces a re-evaluation of where true value and identity lie, shifting it from external accolades and societal approval to an enduring relationship with God, even when His ways are inscrutable.

Reflection and Application

Job 30:1 offers a poignant mirror for contemporary readers, inviting deep empathy for those who experience public shame, loss of standing, or ridicule, especially when it comes from unexpected or seemingly "inferior" sources. It reminds us that external accolades, social status, and the respect of others are fleeting and ultimately unreliable foundations for our identity and worth. Job's profound humiliation challenges us to examine where we place our value—is it in the shifting sands of human opinion or in the unchanging character of God? This verse encourages humility, reminding us that even the most esteemed among us can experience a radical reversal of fortune. It also prompts us to consider how we treat those who have fallen from grace, or those whom society deems "unworthy." Do we perpetuate their shame, or do we extend compassion and dignity? Job's lament calls us to a deeper understanding of suffering that extends beyond physical pain to the profound wound of social ostracism and the loss of honor.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How do I define my own worth and identity? Is it tied to external validation or internal character?
  2. In what ways might I, consciously or unconsciously, "despise" or look down upon others based on their social standing, background, or perceived failures?
  3. How do I respond when I witness someone experiencing public humiliation or a significant loss of status? Am I quick to judge or to empathize?
  4. What does Job's experience in this verse teach me about the transient nature of worldly respect and the enduring importance of spiritual resilience?

FAQ

Why is it so significant that "younger" people are mocking Job?

In ancient Near Eastern culture, age was highly correlated with wisdom, authority, and respect. Elders were revered figures, and it was considered a grave breach of social protocol for younger individuals to disrespect them, let alone openly mock them. For Job, a patriarch who once commanded universal deference (as described in Job 29), to be derided by those "younger" than him signifies a complete and humiliating inversion of the social order. It's not just a personal insult but a profound disruption of the established hierarchy, underscoring the depth of his fall and the extremity of his suffering. It suggests that even the most basic societal norms of respect have collapsed around him.

What is the significance of "dogs of my flock" in this context?

The phrase "dogs of my flock" in Job 30:1 is crucial for understanding the depth of Job's contempt for the lineage of his mockers. In the ancient world, dogs were generally not the beloved pets or valued working animals we often associate with them today. Instead, they were typically wild, scavenging, and considered unclean. They might follow a flock for scraps but were not trained sheepdogs. Therefore, Job's statement that he would have disdained to set their fathers even with these despised, scavenging animals expresses the absolute lowest possible social standing. It's an extreme form of contempt, highlighting that he considered their ancestors utterly worthless and beneath human dignity. The fact that the descendants of such individuals are now mocking him underscores the catastrophic and ironic reversal of his fortunes.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Job 30:1, with its raw portrayal of unjust suffering and profound social humiliation, finds a powerful and ultimate fulfillment in the person of Jesus Christ. Job, a righteous man, is scorned by those he once considered beneath him, experiencing a radical reversal of status. Similarly, Jesus, though "in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant" (Philippians 2:6-7). He was born into humble circumstances, lived a life of service, and ultimately became "a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief" (Isaiah 53:3). The Son of God, the Creator of all, was mocked and reviled by those He came to save, enduring the "contempt of men" (Psalm 22:6) and being "despised and rejected by men" (Isaiah 53:3). He was spat upon, beaten, and crucified alongside criminals, a death reserved for the lowest of society (Matthew 27:27-44). Just as Job suffered unjustly, Christ suffered innocently, bearing the ultimate shame and curse of sin on the cross (Galatians 3:13). Yet, through His profound humiliation and death, God highly exalted Him, bestowing upon Him "the name that is above every name" (Philippians 2:9), vindicating His righteousness and establishing Him as Lord over all, demonstrating that true glory emerges not from worldly status, but from humble obedience and sacrificial love.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Job 30:1–14. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 14 verses
Passage under commentJob 30:1–14
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Here Job makes a very large and sad complaint of the great disgrace he had fallen into, from the height of honour and reputation, which was exceedingly grievous and cutting to such an ingenuous spirit as Job's was. Two things he insists upon as greatly aggravating his affliction: -

I.The meanness of the persons that affronted him.

As it added much to his honour, in the day of his prosperity, that princes and nobles showed him respect and paid a deference to him, so it added no less to his disgrace in his adversity that he was spurned by the footmen, and trampled upon by those that were not only every way his inferiors, but were the meanest and most contemptible of all mankind. None can be represented as more base than those are here represented who insulted Job, upon all accounts.

1.They were young, younger than he (Job 30:1), the youth (Job 30:12), who ought to have behaved themselves respectfully towards him for his age and gravity. Even the children, in their play, played upon him, as the children of Bethel upon the prophet, Go up, thou bald-head. Children soon learn to be scornful when they see their parents so.

2.They were of a mean extraction. Their fathers were so very despicable that such a man as Job would have disdained to take them into the lowest service about his house, as that of tending the sheep and attending the shepherds with the dogs of his flock, Job 30:1. They were so shabby that they were not fit to be seen among his servants, so silly that they were not fit to be employed, and so false that they were not fit to be trusted in the meanest post. Job here speaks of what he might have done, not of what he did: he was not of such a spirit as to set any of the children of men with the dogs of his flock; he knew the dignity of human nature better than to do so.

3.They and their families were the unprofitable burdens of the earth, and good for nothing. Job himself, with all his prudence and patience, could make nothing of them, Job 30:2. The young were not fit for labour, they were so lazy, and went about their work so awkwardly: Whereto might the strength of their hands profit me? The old were not to be advised with in the smallest matters, for in them was old age indeed, but their old age was perished, they were twice children.

4.They were extremely poor, Job 30:3. They were ready to starve, for they would not dig, and to beg they were ashamed. Had they been brought to necessity by the providence of God, their neighbours would have sought them out as proper objects of charity and would have relieved them; but, being brought into straits by their own slothfulness and wastefulness, nobody was forward to relieve them. Hence they were forced to flee into the deserts both for shelter and sustenance, and were put to sorry shifts indeed, when they cut up mallows by the bushes, and were glad to eat them, for want of food that was fit for them, Job 30:4. See what hunger will bring men to: one half of the world does not know how the other half lives; yet those that have abundance ought to think sometimes of those whose fare is very coarse and who are brought to a short allowance of that too. But we must own the righteousness of God, and not think it strange, if slothfulness clothe men with rags and the idle soul be made to suffer hunger. This beggarly world is full of the devil's poor.

5.They were very scandalous wicked people, not only the burdens, but the plagues, of the places where they lived, arrant scoundrels, the scum of the country: They were driven forth from among men, Job 30:5. They were such lying, thieving, lurking, mischievous people, that the best service the magistrates could do was to rid the country of them, while the very mob cried after them as after a thief. Away with such fellows from the earth; it is not fit they should live. They were lazy and would not work, and therefore they were exclaimed against as thieves, and justly; for those that do not earn their own bread by honest labour do, in effect, steal the bread out of other people's mouths. An idle fellow is a public nuisance; but it is better to drive such into a workhouse than, as here, into a wilderness, which will punish them indeed, but never reform them. They were forced to dwell in caves of the earth, and they brayed like asses among the bushes, Job 30:6, Job 30:7. See what is the lot of those that have the cry of the country, the cry of their own conscience, against them; they cannot but be in a continual terror and confusion. They groan among the trees (so Broughton) and smart among the nettles; they are stung and scratched there, where they hoped to be sheltered and protected. See what miseries wicked people bring themselves to in this world; yet this is nothing to what is in reserve for them in the other world. 8. They had nothing at all in them to recommend them to any man's esteem. They were a vile kind; yea, a kind without fame, people that nobody could give a good word to nor had a good wish for; they were banished from the earth as being viler than the earth. One would not think it possible that ever the human nature should sink so low, and degenerate so far, as it did in these people. When we thank God that we are men we have reason to thank him that we are not such men. But such as these were abusive to Job,

(1.)In revenge, because when he was in prosperity and power, like a good magistrate, he put in execution the laws which were in force against vagabonds, and rogues, and sturdy beggars, which these base people now remembered against him.

(2.)In triumph over him, because they thought he had now become like one of them. Isa 14:10, Isa 14:11. The abjects, men of mean spirits, insult over the miserable, Psa 35:15.

II.The greatness of the affronts that were given him. It cannot be imagined how abusive they were.

1.They made ballads on him, with which they made themselves and their companions merry (Job 30:9): I am their song and their byword. Those have a very base spirit that turn the calamities of their honest neighbours into a jest, and can sport themselves with their griefs.

2.They shunned him as a loathsome spectacle, abhorred him, fled far from him, (Job 30:10), as an ugly monster or as one infected. Those that were themselves driven out from among men would have had him driven out. For,

3.They expressed the greatest scorn and indignation against him. They spat in his face, or were ready to do so; they tripped up his heels, pushed away his feet (Job 30:12), kicked him, either in wrath, because they hated him, or in sport, to make themselves merry with him, as they did with their companions at foot-ball. The best of saints have sometimes received the worst of injuries and indignities from a spiteful, scornful, wicked world, and must not think it strange; our Master himself was thus abused.

4.They were very malicious against him, and not only made a jest of him, but made a prey of him - not only affronted him, but set themselves to do him all the real mischief they could devise: They raise up against me the ways of their destruction; or (as some read it), They cast upon me the cause of their woe; that is, "They lay the blame of their being driven out upon me;" and it is common for criminals to hate the judges and laws by which they are punished. But under this pretence,

(1.)They accused him falsely, and misrepresented his former conversation, which is here called marring his path. They reflected upon him as a tyrant and an oppressor because he had done justice upon them; and perhaps Job's friends grounded their uncharitable censures of him (Job 22:6, etc.) upon the unjust and unreasonable clamours of these sorry people; and it was an instance of their great weakness and inconsideration, for who can be innocent if the accusations of such persons may be heeded?

(2.)They not only triumphed in his calamity, but set it forward, and did all they could to add to his miseries and make them more grievous to him. It is a great sin to forward the calamity of any, especially of good people. In this they have no helper, nobody to set them on or to countenance them in it, nobody to bear them out or to protect them, but they do it of their own accord; they are fools in other things, but wise enough to do mischief, and need no help in inventing that. Some read it thus, They hold my heaviness a profit, though they be never the better. Wicked people, though they get nothing by the calamities of others, yet rejoice in them.

5.Those that did him all this mischief were numerous, unanimous, and violent (Job 30:14): They came upon me as a wide breaking in of waters, when the dam is broken; or, "They came as soldiers into a broad breach which they have made in the wall of a besieged city, pouring in upon me with the utmost fury;" and in this they took a pride and a pleasure: They rolled themselves in the desolation as a man rolls himself in a soft and easy bed, and they rolled themselves upon him with all the weight of their malice.

III.All this contempt put upon him was caused by the troubles he was in (Job 30:11):

"Because he has loosed my cord, has taken away the honour and power with which I was girded (Job 12:18), has scattered what I had got together and untwisted all my affairs - because he has afflicted me, therefore they have let loose the bridle before me," that is, "have given themselves a liberty to say and do what they please against me." Those that by Providence are stripped of their honour may expect to be loaded with contempt by inconsiderate ill-natured people. "Because he hath loosed his cord" (the original has that reading also), that is, "because he has taken off his bridle of restraint from off their malice, they cast away the bridle from me," that is, "they make no account of my authority, nor stand in any awe of me." It is owing to the hold God has of the consciences even of bad men, and the restraints he lays upon them, that we are not continually thus insulted and abused; and, if at any time we meet with such ill treatment, we must acknowledge the hand of God in taking off those restraints, as David did when Shimei cursed him: So let him curse, for the Lord hath bidden him. Now in all this,

1.We may see the uncertainty of worldly honour, and particularly of popular applause, how suddenly a man may fail from the height of dignity into the depth of disgrace. What little cause therefore have men to be ambitious or proud of that which may be so easily lost, and what little confidence is to be put in it! Those that today cry Hosannah may tomorrow cry Crucify. But there is an honour which comes from God, which if we secure, we shall find it not thus changeable and loseable.

2.We may see that it has often been the lot of very wise and good men to be trampled upon and abused. And,

3.That those who look only at the things that are seen despise those whom the world frowns upon, though they are ever so much the favourites of Heaven. Nothing is more grievous in poverty than that it renders men contemptible. Turba Remi sequitur fortunam, ut semper odit damnatos - The Roman populace, faithful to the turns of fortune, still persecute the fallen.

4.We may see in Job a type of Christ, who was thus made a reproach of men and despised of the people (Psa 22:6; Isa 53:3), and who hid not his face from shame and spitting, but bore the indignity better than Job did.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Historical Reception

2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

2 quotes · AD 455–604
Post-NiceneEarly Medieval
500600

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

AD 455Julian of EclanumPost-NiceneSourceEXPOSITION ON THE BOOK OF JOB 30:1
“But now they make sport of me, those who are younger than I.” These words testify to the authority, power and grace that, as he has asserted, he used to own in his previous days. The more favorable his state of former happiness had been, the more bitter now it makes his feeling of pain after turning into misfortune.“Whose fathers I would have disdained to set with the dogs of my flock.” He now refers to an evidence of extreme poverty, through which also the vileness of his condition appears, not only the fact that he lives on charity but also that he is appointed to take care of the food of dogs.
AD 604Gregory the DialogistEarly Medieval
15. All heretics when compared to the age of the Church Universal are fitly called ‘younger’ in time, because they went forth out of her, not she out of them. Whence it is rightly also said by John; They went out from us, but they were not of us: for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us. [1 John 2, 19] For ‘they that are younger in time deride Holy Church,’ when they that went out from her, set at nought the words of her instruction; concerning whom it is further added;
Whose fathers I would have disdained to set with the dogs of my flock.
Who is the ‘flock’ of Holy Church saving the multitude of the faithful? Or who else are called ‘the dogs’ of this flock, but the holy Teachers, who became the guardians of those believers? Which same whilst in behalf of their Lord they cried aloud, given up to daily and nightly watchings, uttered, so to say, loud barks of preaching. Concerning whom it is said to that Church by the Psalmist, The tongue of Thy dogs from the enemies by the same. [Ps. 68, 23] Since there are some that being recalled from the worshipping of idols are made the preachers of God. So ‘the tongue of the dogs’ of the Church goeth forth from enemies, because the Gentiles that are converted the Lord makes even preachers. Whence the slowness of the Jews, who refused to speak in God’s behalf by the Prophet upbraiding them is made matter of blame, where he says, they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark. [Is. 56, 10]
16. Now we speak of the fathers of Heretics meaning those whom we style ‘Heresiarchs,’ by whose evil preaching, i.e. by the seed of speaking, the peoples following them were begotten in error. So then Holy Church ‘disdains to set the fathers’ of heretics ‘with the dogs of her flock,’ because the founders of erring tenets on trying she rejects, and contemns to number them among the true Fathers. Which persons though they seemed to have recalled some from the erroneousness of heathenism, to have trained the practices of some to the doing what is right, yet for this that they did not think right things of God, she does not ‘set them with the dogs of the flock,’ because she does not rank them with right preachers. For it is plain that Arius; Photinus, Macedonius, Nestorius, Eutyches, Dioscorus, Severus, and numbers like to these, endeavoured by teaching and persuading to appear fathers. But their errors the Holy Church Universal trying with strict severity, does not ‘number those persons among the keepers of’ her flock,’ whom she condemns as breaking up the unity of that flock. Of which same it is said to the Ephesians by the voice of Paul, For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock. [Acts 20, 29] And because it sometimes happens that heretics in proportion as they fall away more into the erroneousness of misbelief, guard themselves the more fully in outward practising, so that they may appear to do great things above the rest of the world, the Holy Church Universal sets at nought all their works, which she observes do not come forth by the authority of faith.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Job 30:1 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8