How then can man be justified with God? or how can he be clean [that is] born of a woman?
How then can man {H582} be justified {H6663} with God {H410}? or how can he be clean {H2135} that is born {H3205} of a woman {H802}?
How then can humans be righteous with God? How can those born of women be clean?
How then can a man be just before God? How can one born of woman be pure?
How then can man be just with God? Or how can he be clean that is born of a woman?
-
Job 15:14
What [is] man, that he should be clean? and [he which is] born of a woman, that he should be righteous? -
Job 15:16
How much more abominable and filthy [is] man, which drinketh iniquity like water? -
Romans 5:1
¶ Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ: -
Job 4:17
Shall mortal man be more just than God? shall a man be more pure than his maker? -
Job 4:19
How much less [in] them that dwell in houses of clay, whose foundation [is] in the dust, [which] are crushed before the moth? -
Job 9:2
I know [it is] so of a truth: but how should man be just with God? -
Psalms 130:3
If thou, LORD, shouldest mark iniquities, O Lord, who shall stand?
Job 25:4, spoken by Bildad the Shuhite, presents a profound rhetorical question that cuts to the heart of the human condition and God's absolute holiness. It asks, "How then can man be justified with God? or how can he be clean [that is] born of a woman?" This verse encapsulates a central theological dilemma wrestled with throughout Scripture.
Context
This verse comes from Bildad's third and shortest speech in the book of Job. The book of Job chronicles the suffering of a righteous man and the subsequent theological debate between Job and his three friends (Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar) concerning the nature of divine justice and human suffering. Bildad, like his friends, operates under the traditional retribution theology, believing that suffering is a direct result of sin. In this brief address, Bildad emphasizes God's immense power, majesty, and purity, contrasting it sharply with the inherent impurity and insignificance of humanity. His intent is to humble Job and underscore the vast, unbridgeable gap between a perfect God and a flawed human, thereby implicitly suggesting Job must be guilty to be suffering.
Key Themes
Linguistic Insights
The KJV translates two crucial Hebrew words here:
The rhetorical questions underscore the human inability to achieve this state of justification or cleanness by their own efforts or merit. From Bildad's perspective, without divine intervention, it is an impossibility.
Theological Significance & Application
While Bildad's application of this truth to Job was insensitive and incomplete, the question itself is profoundly significant and sets the stage for a major theme in biblical theology. The Old Testament consistently points to the reality that humanity is inherently flawed and separated from God by sin. The law, sacrifices, and rituals all highlighted this need for cleansing and atonement, yet they could not fully "justify" or make one truly "clean" in the ultimate sense.
This verse beautifully anticipates the New Testament's answer to this foundational problem. The New Testament reveals that the profound theological question of how a sinful human can be declared righteous before a holy God is answered through God's grace, not human works. It is through faith in Jesus Christ, who perfectly fulfilled God's righteousness and bore the sins of humanity, that justification is freely offered (Romans 5:1). We are made clean not by anything we do, but by the cleansing power of His blood.
For us today, Job 25:4 serves as a powerful reminder of: