Job 22:3

Translation
King James Version
Is it any pleasure to the Almighty, that thou art righteous? or is it gain to him, that thou makest thy ways perfect?
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Is it any pleasure H2656 to the Almighty H7706, that thou art righteous H6663? or is it gain H1215 to him, that thou makest thy ways H1870 perfect H8552?
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Does Shaddai gain if you are righteous? Does he profit if you make your ways blameless?
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Does it delight the Almighty that you are righteous? Does He profit if your ways are blameless?
Ask
American Standard Version
Is it any pleasure to the Almighty, that thou art righteous? Or is it gainto him, that thou makest thy ways perfect?
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Is it any pleasure to the Almighty, that you are righteous? Or does it benefit him, that you make your ways perfect?
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Is it any thing vnto the Almightie, that thou art righteous? or is it profitable to him, that thou makest thy wayes vpright?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Is it a delight to the Mighty One That thou art righteous? is it gain, That thou makest perfect thy ways?
Ask
See also
Malachi 2:17Job 23:10Job 23:12Proverbs 11:20Psalms 119:592 Corinthians 7:1Proverbs 11:1
See on the biblical-era map
Job
Job View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 13,393 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Job 22:3, spoken by Eliphaz the Temanite, presents a rhetorical question challenging Job's righteousness. Eliphaz asserts that God, the Almighty, gains nothing from human piety or perfect ways. While this statement contains a profound theological truth about God's absolute self-sufficiency (aseity), Eliphaz misapplies it as a premise to accuse Job of hidden sin, arguing that Job's suffering could not be a concern to a God who needs nothing from humanity, and therefore must be a just consequence of unconfessed wickedness. The verse thus highlights both divine independence and the dangerous potential for misusing sound doctrine to condemn.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse opens Eliphaz's third and most aggressive speech to Job, found in Job 22. Having failed to persuade Job through more subtle insinuations, Eliphaz now directly accuses Job of specific, grievous sins, such as oppressing the poor and withholding water from the thirsty (Job 22:5-9). Job 22:3 serves as the theological bedrock for these accusations. Eliphaz argues that since God is utterly independent and gains nothing from human righteousness, Job's claims of innocence are irrelevant to God's actions. This premise allows Eliphaz to conclude that Job's immense suffering must be a consequence of divine judgment for unconfessed sin, thereby setting the stage for his subsequent call for Job to repent and confess his "hidden" iniquity, promising restoration if he does so (Job 22:21-30).
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The Book of Job is a wisdom book set in the ancient Near East, likely in the land of Uz. The theological framework espoused by Job's friends, including Eliphaz, is rooted in the prevailing concept of divine retribution: the belief that God blesses the righteous with prosperity and punishes the wicked with suffering. This "Deuteronomic" theology, while having a basis in covenantal principles (e.g., Deuteronomy 28), was often rigidly and simplistically applied to individual circumstances. In this worldview, Job's inexplicable suffering could only be interpreted as proof of profound wickedness, regardless of his outward blamelessness. Eliphaz's argument in Job 22:3 is deeply embedded in this retributive system, attempting to fit Job's complex reality into a predictable theological formula that ultimately fails to grasp the full scope of divine justice and human suffering.
  • Key Themes: The verse, despite its misapplication, contributes to several significant themes within the Book of Job. First, it powerfully articulates the profound truth of God's Self-Sufficiency (Aseity). Eliphaz's rhetorical question, "Is it any pleasure to the Almighty, that thou art righteous? or is it gain to him, that thou makest thy ways perfect?" underscores God's absolute independence. God does not need human righteousness, service, or worship to enhance His being, power, or happiness; He is complete in Himself, lacking nothing. This fundamental theological concept is affirmed throughout Scripture, as seen in Acts 17:25, where Paul declares that God "is not served by human hands, as though he needed anything." Second, the verse highlights The Flawed Nature of Retributive Theology. Eliphaz's use of a true theological premise (God's aseity) to draw a false conclusion about Job's suffering is central to the book's critique of rigid retributive theology. The friends' insistence that Job must be sinful, despite his integrity, demonstrates the dangers of applying theological principles without empathy, nuanced understanding, or an openness to divine mystery. This flawed counsel ultimately leads to God's direct rebuke of Job's friends in Job 42:7. Finally, the verse implicitly raises questions about The Purpose of Human Righteousness. While God does not "gain" from human righteousness in a transactional sense, human obedience and "perfecting ways" are profoundly important for humanity itself. Righteous living leads to blessing, peace, and a proper relationship with God, as highlighted in passages like Deuteronomy 10:13, where commandments are given "for thy good." Our righteousness is a humble and grateful response to God's grace, not a contribution to His divine sufficiency.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Almighty (Hebrew, Shadday', H7706): This divine name, frequently used in the Book of Job, emphasizes God's omnipotence, sovereign power, and absolute self-sufficiency. It conveys His ability to provide for His creation and His complete independence from it. Eliphaz employs this name to underscore God's immense majesty and Job's perceived insignificance, implying that Job's righteousness could not possibly add anything to such a transcendent Being.
  • Pleasure (Hebrew, chêphets', H2656): This term denotes delight, desire, or favor. Eliphaz's question, "Is it any pleasure to the Almighty...?" implies that God derives no personal satisfaction or benefit from human righteousness, as if it were a trivial matter to Him. The term suggests a lack of need or dependence on God's part for human moral performance, reinforcing the idea that God's actions are not dictated by human behavior.
  • Gain (Hebrew, betsaʻ', H1215): This word signifies plunder, profit, or advantage, often used in economic or commercial contexts, frequently with a connotation of unjust gain. By asking if Job's perfection is "gain" to God, Eliphaz frames righteousness in transactional terms, suggesting that God does not accrue any benefit or increase in His divine being from human moral striving. The implied answer from Eliphaz's perspective is a resounding "no," which he uses to reinforce his argument that Job's righteousness is irrelevant to God's decision to inflict suffering.

Verse Breakdown

  • "[Is it] any pleasure to the Almighty, that thou art righteous?": Eliphaz initiates his argument with a rhetorical question, directly challenging Job's claim of righteousness. By invoking "the Almighty" (Shadday'), he emphasizes God's supreme power and utter independence. The underlying implication is that God is so entirely self-sufficient that human righteousness, no matter how sincere, cannot possibly add to His joy or well-being. This premise sets the stage for Eliphaz's subsequent argument that Job's piety is not a factor that would prevent God from afflicting him.
  • "or [is it] gain [to him], that thou makest thy ways perfect?": This second rhetorical question parallels the first, reinforcing the concept of God's absolute independence. The word "gain" (betsaʻ'), suggesting profit or advantage, often in a material or even ill-gotten sense. Eliphaz is asserting that God does not benefit in any way, nor does He accumulate any surplus, from Job's "perfected ways" (referring to Job's blameless conduct and integrity). The rhetorical nature of the question expects a negative answer, leading Eliphaz to conclude that Job's suffering cannot be explained by God's need or lack, but rather must be a consequence of Job's hidden sin, as God would not arbitrarily punish the truly perfect.

Literary Devices

The verse is primarily structured around Rhetorical Question, where Eliphaz poses two questions not to elicit an answer from Job, but to assert his own theological premise: God is entirely self-sufficient and gains nothing from human righteousness. This device allows Eliphaz to make a forceful, declarative statement disguised as an inquiry, aiming to corner Job into accepting his worldview. The two clauses of the verse ("Is it any pleasure to the Almighty, that thou art righteous?" and "or is it gain to him, that thou makest thy ways perfect?") also exhibit Synonymous Parallelism. The second clause essentially repeats and reinforces the idea of the first using different but equivalent terms ("pleasure" / "gain," "righteous" / "makest thy ways perfect"). This literary technique adds emphasis and intensity to Eliphaz's argument, driving home the point of God's absolute independence. Furthermore, there is a profound Irony present in Eliphaz's statement. While the theological truth about God's self-sufficiency is correct, Eliphaz applies it incorrectly to condemn Job. The irony lies in using a divine attribute to justify a false accusation, demonstrating how sound doctrine can be twisted to serve a flawed human agenda. The audience, privy to the prologue (Job 1-2), knows Job is righteous and that his suffering is not due to sin, making Eliphaz's "truth" tragically misdirected.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Job 22:3, despite its misapplication by Eliphaz, powerfully articulates the biblical truth of God's aseity—His absolute independence and self-sufficiency. God does not need anything from His creation, including our righteousness or worship, to be complete or glorious. Our obedience does not "add" to His divine essence, nor does our sin diminish it. Rather, our acts of righteousness are a fitting response to His grace and a demonstration of our love and trust, ultimately benefiting us by bringing us into deeper fellowship with Him and aligning us with His good purposes. This truth guards against any transactional view of our relationship with God, where we might imagine our actions obligate Him or contribute to His being. It underscores that all glory and benefit flow from Him to us, not the other way around.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Eliphaz's flawed counsel in Job 22:3 nevertheless presents a profound opportunity for reflection on the nature of our relationship with God. If God truly gains nothing from our righteousness, what then is the motivation for our obedience and pursuit of holiness? This verse challenges any self-serving or transactional view of faith, where we might imagine our good deeds somehow obligate God or contribute to His divine perfection. Instead, it invites us into a posture of humble gratitude and worship. Our righteousness is not a gift to God that He needs, but a gift from God that transforms us and enables us to live in alignment with His good and perfect will. It is a response of love to His prior grace, a testament to His work within us, and a means by which we experience the fullness of life He intends. This understanding liberates us from performance-based religion, fostering genuine devotion rooted in His infinite worthiness, not our ability to "add" to Him. It encourages us to serve Him not out of His need, but out of His overwhelming love and our grateful hearts, knowing that our obedience ultimately benefits us and brings Him glory by revealing His transformative power.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does understanding God's self-sufficiency (aseity) impact your motivation for obedience and worship?
  • In what ways might you unknowingly approach your relationship with God as transactional, as if your actions could "add" to Him or obligate Him?
  • How does the truth that God needs nothing from you free you to serve Him out of pure love and gratitude, rather than a sense of duty or obligation?
  • What does it mean for your daily life to live as someone whose righteousness is a response to God's grace, rather than a means to "gain" His favor?

FAQ

Does God truly not "gain" anything from our righteousness, or is Eliphaz's statement entirely wrong?

Answer: Eliphaz's statement contains a profound theological truth, though he misapplies it to condemn Job. God, as the "Almighty" (Shadday'), is absolutely self-sufficient and lacks nothing. Human righteousness does not add to His divine essence, power, or happiness. He is not dependent on creation for His being or glory. In this sense, He does not "gain" from our righteousness as if He were deficient without it. However, this does not mean our righteousness is meaningless to God. Rather, it is pleasing to Him as a reflection of His character in us, a demonstration of our love and obedience, and a means by which His kingdom purposes are advanced on earth. Our righteousness is for our good and His glory, but not because He has a "need" that we fulfill (see Acts 17:25).

If God doesn't need our righteousness, why does He command us to be righteous?

Answer: God commands righteousness not because He needs it to complete Himself, but because it is for our ultimate good and flourishes His creation. Righteousness aligns us with His perfect character and brings us into proper relationship with Him, leading to blessing, peace, and true flourishing. It is an expression of His love for us, guiding us towards a life that reflects His image and brings Him glory (see Deuteronomy 10:13 and 1 Peter 1:15-16). Our obedience is a response to His grace, demonstrating our trust and love, and is the means through which we experience the abundant life He offers.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Eliphaz's words in Job 22:3 were spoken with a flawed understanding of Job's situation, the underlying truth of God's self-sufficiency finds its ultimate and most profound fulfillment in Jesus Christ. The New Testament reveals that our righteousness is not something we achieve to "gain" God's favor or add to His being, but is a gift freely bestowed through faith in Christ. Jesus, as the perfectly righteous Son of God, lived a life of complete obedience, fulfilling all righteousness on our behalf (Matthew 3:15). His sacrificial death on the cross, as the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, perfectly satisfied divine justice, not because God was lacking, but because His holy character demands a response to sin. Through Christ, we are not merely made righteous, but we are given His righteousness (2 Corinthians 5:21). This divine imputation means that God's "pleasure" and "gain" are found not in our imperfect efforts, but in the perfect work of His Son. Our "perfected ways" are now a response to the perfection already accomplished in Christ, enabling us to live lives that reflect His glory, not to earn a place with Him, but to express the new life we have received in Him (Ephesians 2:8-10). Thus, the truth of God's independence from human righteousness underscores the radical grace of the Gospel: salvation is entirely God's work, from beginning to end, centered in Christ.

Copy as

Commentary on Job 22 verses 1–4

Eliphaz here insinuates that, because Job complained so much of his afflictions, he thought God was unjust in afflicting him; but it was a strained innuendo. Job was far from thinking so. What Eliphaz says here is therefore unjustly applied to Job, but in itself it is very true and good,

I. That when God does us good it is not because he is indebted to us; if he were, there might be some colour to say, when he afflicts us, "He does not deal fairly with us." But whoever pretends that he has by any meritorious action made God his debtor, let him prove this debt, and he shall be sure not to lose it, Rom 11:35. Who has given to him, and it shall be recompensed to him again? But Eliphaz here shows that the righteousness and perfection of the best man in the world are no real benefit or advantage to God, and therefore cannot be thought to merit any thing from him. 1. Man's piety is no profit to God, no gain, Job 22:1, Job 22:2. If we could by any thing merit from God, it would be by our piety, our being righteous, and making our way perfect. If that will not merit, surely nothing else will. If a man cannot make God his debtor by his godliness, and honesty, and obedience to his laws, much less can he by his wit, and learning, and worldly policy. Now Eliphaz here asks whether any man can possibly be profitable to God. It is certain that he cannot. By no means. He that is wise may be profitable to himself. Note, Our wisdom and piety are that by which we ourselves are, and are likely to be, great gainers. Wisdom is profitable to direct, Ecc 10:10. Godliness is profitable to all things, Ti1 4:8. If thou be wise, thou shalt be wise for thyself, Pro 9:12. The gains of religion are infinitely greater than the losses of it, and so it will appear when they are balanced. But can a man be thus profitable to God? No, for such is the perfection of God that he cannot receive any benefit or advantage by men; what can be added to that which is infinite? And such is the weakness and imperfection of man that he cannot offer any benefit or advantage to God. Can the light of a candle be profitable to the sun or the drop of the bucket to the ocean? He that is wise is profitable to himself, for his own direction and defence, his own credit and comfort; he can with his wisdom entertain himself and enrich himself; but can he so be profitable to God? No; God needs not us nor our services. We are undone, for ever undone, without him; but he is happy, for ever happy, without us. Is it any gain to him, any real addition to his glory or wealth, if we make our way perfect? Suppose it were absolutely perfect, yet what is God the better? Much less when it is so far short of being perfect. 2. It is no pleasure to him. God has indeed expressed himself in his word well pleased with the righteous; his countenance beholds them and his delight is in them and their prayers; but all that adds nothing to the infinite satisfaction and complacency which the Eternal Mind has in itself. God can enjoy himself without us, though we could have but little enjoyment of ourselves without our friends. This magnifies his condescension, in that, though our services be no real profit or pleasure to him, yet he invites, encourages, and accepts them.

II. That when God restrains or rebukes us it is not because he is in danger from us or jealous of us (Job 22:4): "Will he reprove thee for fear of thee, and take thee down from thy prosperity lest thou shouldst grow too great for him, as princes sometimes have thought it a piece of policy to curb the growing greatness of a subject, lest he should become formidable?" Satan indeed suggested to our first parents that God forbade them the tree of knowledge for fear of them, lest they should be as gods, and so become rivals with him; but it was a base insinuation. God rebukes the good because he loves them, but he never rebukes the great because he fears them. He does not enter into judgment with men, that is, pick a quarrel with them and seek occasion against them, through fear lest they should eclipse his honour or endanger his interest. Magistrates punish offenders for fear of them. Pharaoh oppressed Israel because he feared them. It was for fear that Herod slew the children of Bethlehem and that the Jews persecuted Christ and his apostles. But God does not, as they did, pervert justice for fear of any. See Job 35:5-8.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–4. Public domain.
Copy as
John ChrysostomAD 407
COMMENTARY ON JOB 22:3-4
“What does it matter to the Lord, if you were blameless in your works?” That is, it has no importance for God. “Or does he gain any profit from the righteousness of your conduct?” It cannot be said that, in fact, it contributes to him any advantage, he says. Since Job in every possible manner had said that God did this and because of him I am suffering, Eliphaz wants to show that [his afflictions] do not come from God. “Or, in order to make a case against you, will he accuse you and enter into judgment with you?” Yes, you can be as righteous as you want, it does not matter for him, and he has no consideration for you, that is, what you do deserves little interest on the part of God. In fact, if he really wanted to judge you, he would have found your faults.
Gregory the DialogistAD 604
2. For in all that we do well, we are doing good to ourselves and not to God. And hence by the Psalmist it is said, O my soul, thou hast said unto the Lord, Thou art my God, seeing that Thou needest not my goods. [Ps. 16, 2] For He is truly ‘Lord’ to us, because He is also assuredly ‘God,’ Who needs not the good in him that serveth Him, but bestows the goodness which He receives, so that the goodness which is offered up should avail not Himself, but those that first receive and afterwards render back. For though the Lord, when He cometh for Judgment, saith, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto the least of these My brethren, ye have done it unto Me; it is with extraordinary pitifulness that He says this, by sympathy with His members. And He the same Being hereby, viz. that He is our Head, aids, Who by our good deeds in His members is aided. Yet further Eliphaz adds what there is no man but is aware of.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Job 22:3 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.