Jeremiah 43:7

Translation
King James Version
So they came into the land of Egypt: for they obeyed not the voice of the LORD: thus came they even to Tahpanhes.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
So they came H935 into the land H776 of Egypt H4714: for they obeyed H8085 not the voice H6963 of the LORD H3068: thus came H935 they even to Tahpanhes H8471.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
and went to the land of Egypt; for they did not heed what ADONAI had said; and they arrived in Tachpanches.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
So they entered the land of Egypt because they did not obey the voice of the LORD, and they went as far as Tahpanhes.
Ask
American Standard Version
And they came into the land of Egypt; for they obeyed not the voice of Jehovah: and they came unto Tahpanhes.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
and they came into the land of Egypt; for they didn’t obey the voice of the LORD: and they came to Tahpanhes.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
So they came into the lande of Egypt: for they obeied not the voice of the Lord: thus came they to Tahpanhes.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and they enter the land of Egypt, for they have not hearkened to the voice of Jehovah, and they enter unto Tahpanhes.
Ask
See also
Jeremiah 44:1Jeremiah 2:16Isaiah 30:4Jeremiah 46:14Ezekiel 30:182 Chronicles 25:16
See on the biblical-era map
Israelite Refugees in Egypt
Israelite Refugees in Egypt View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 20,005 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Jeremiah 43:7 chronicles the tragic culmination of Judah's remnant's defiant journey into Egypt, specifically their arrival at Tahpanhes, in direct and willful disobedience to the LORD's explicit command delivered through His prophet Jeremiah. This act starkly underscores their profound rejection of divine counsel, their preference for perceived worldly security over God's promised protection within the land, and their unwitting march toward the very dangers and judgments they sought to escape.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Jeremiah 43:7 marks a pivotal and lamentable turning point in the post-fall of Jerusalem narrative, specifically following the assassination of Gedaliah. Chapters 40-42 meticulously detail the chaotic aftermath, the remnant's palpable fear of Babylonian reprisal, and their desperate, albeit insincere, plea to Jeremiah to inquire of the LORD regarding their future. In Jeremiah 42, God delivers an unambiguous command: they are to remain in the land of Judah, where He promises protection, blessing, and restoration. Conversely, He issues a severe warning that if they venture into Egypt, they will inevitably face the very sword, famine, and pestilence they dread. Despite this divine clarity, the people, swayed by proud and unfaithful men like Johanan, accuse Jeremiah of deceit and resolutely decide to flee to Egypt. Jeremiah 43:1-7 records their willful departure, culminating in their arrival at Tahpanhes, thereby setting the stage for further divine pronouncements and judgments against them in Egypt.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: The fall of Jerusalem in 586 BC to the Neo-Babylonian Empire signified the end of the Judean kingdom and initiated the Babylonian exile for a significant portion of the population. A small remnant remained in Judah, living under Babylonian-appointed governors. The subsequent assassination of Gedaliah, the governor, ignited widespread fear among the remaining Judeans of further Babylonian retribution. Historically, Egypt, a formidable regional power, had frequently served as a source of false hope and a tempting, yet ultimately unreliable, ally for Israel (Isaiah 30:1-7 and Isaiah 31:1-3). For the remnant, Egypt represented a perceived haven of safety and strength, a place where they might evade Babylonian influence. Tahpanhes, situated in the eastern Nile Delta, was a significant Egyptian frontier city, likely serving as a strategic military outpost or administrative center, making it a logical initial destination for those fleeing from Judah. The cultural propensity to seek alliances or refuge with powerful nations, rather than placing exclusive trust in Yahweh, was a recurring and detrimental pattern throughout Israel's history.

  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully encapsulates several enduring themes prevalent within the book of Jeremiah and the broader biblical narrative. Foremost among them is Disobedience to God's Voice, highlighting the people's willful and conscious rejection of divine counsel, despite its clarity and the prophet's faithful delivery. This act profoundly underscores the theme of False Security, as the remnant sought refuge in worldly power (Egypt) rather than trusting in God's promised protection within the land of Judah, thereby demonstrating a profound and ultimately destructive lack of faith. Consequently, the verse introduces the theme of Consequences of Rebellion, as their journey to Tahpanhes was not a path to safety but a direct route into the very dangers God had warned them about, foreshadowing further judgment. Finally, it contributes significantly to the theme of Prophetic Fulfillment, as Jeremiah's earlier warnings regarding judgment upon those who fled to Egypt (e.g., Jeremiah 42:15-18) begin to unfold with their arrival, setting the stage for subsequent divine pronouncements against them within Egypt itself (Jeremiah 44:1).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • obeyed (Hebrew, shâmaʻ', H8085): This primitive root (H8085) means "to hear intelligently," often carrying the crucial implication of attention, consent, and, most significantly, obedience. In the context of "obeyed not," it signifies a deliberate, conscious refusal to heed or comply with the divine instruction. This was not a mere failure to perceive, but a profound failure to act upon what was clearly heard, indicating a deep spiritual rebellion and a hardening of hearts against the LORD's explicit will.
  • voice (Hebrew, qôwl', H6963): This word (H6963), meaning "a voice or sound," here refers specifically to the audible or communicated word of the LORD, representing the authoritative prophetic message delivered by Jeremiah. The phrase "the voice of the LORD" emphasizes the divine origin and absolute authority of the command that was rejected. It underscores that what they disobeyed was not merely human advice but the direct, personal utterance of God Himself, the covenant-keeping Yahweh.
  • LORD (Hebrew, Yᵉhôvâh', H3068): This is the sacred, covenantal name of God (H3068), often transliterated as "Jehovah" or "Yahweh," signifying "the self-Existent or Eternal One." The use of this specific name highlights that the disobedience was directed against the very God who had entered into a covenant relationship with Israel, who had miraculously delivered them from their original bondage in Egypt, and who continued to reveal His sovereign will to them. Their rebellion was not against a generic deity but against the personal, faithful, and sovereign God of Israel.

Verse Breakdown

  • "So they came into the land of Egypt": This clause describes the physical act of the remnant's journey and their subsequent arrival in Egypt. It signifies the tangible completion of their defiant decision to flee Judah, illustrating the immediate and direct consequence of their unbelief and rejection of God's command. Their entry into Egypt, a nation historically associated with bondage, idolatry, and a place from which God had liberated their ancestors, symbolically represents their departure from God's promised land and His protective care.
  • "for they obeyed not the voice of the LORD": This is the pivotal explanatory clause, explicitly stating the fundamental reason for their migration. It reveals their core transgression: a deliberate and active refusal to listen to and follow the divine command communicated through Jeremiah. This disobedience is presented as the direct and primary cause of their journey, highlighting the profound moral and spiritual failure at the heart of their actions, prioritizing their own fears and perceived wisdom over God's clear instruction.
  • "thus came they [even] to Tahpanhes.": This final clause specifies their precise destination within Egypt. Tahpanhes, a strategic border city, marks the exact location where their flight from God's will and their pursuit of self-preservation concluded. The phrase "thus came they" underscores the grim inevitability of their arrival once the decision to disobey was made, emphasizing that their chosen path, contrary to God's warning, led them directly to a place where further divine judgment would pursue them.

Literary Devices

Jeremiah 43:7 employs several significant literary devices that amplify its theological weight. Irony is powerfully present, as the people's flight to Egypt, ostensibly undertaken to secure their safety from the Babylonians, leads them directly into a place where God's judgment will inexorably pursue them, as later prophecies in Jeremiah vividly reveal. Their desperate pursuit of perceived safety ironically becomes the very catalyst for their undoing. There is also strong Foreshadowing embedded within this verse; their arrival in Tahpanhes sets the stage for God's further pronouncements of judgment against them within Egypt, clearly indicating that their rebellion will not go unpunished but will incur divine retribution. The very act of entering Egypt, a land from which God had miraculously delivered their ancestors during the Exodus, carries deep Symbolism. Egypt consistently represents reliance on human strength, worldly alliances, and idolatry, standing in stark contrast to the divine protection and covenant faithfulness promised if they had remained in Judah. Their return to Egypt thus symbolizes a profound spiritual regression, a turning away from the covenant God who had called them out of that very land into freedom and relationship.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Jeremiah 43:7 stands as a stark and enduring testament to the profound consequences of human rebellion against divine authority, echoing a recurring and lamentable theme throughout biblical history. It powerfully illustrates the truth that seeking security, provision, or guidance outside of God's revealed will inevitably leads to greater peril and spiritual desolation, even when such choices appear rational or appealing from a purely human perspective. This passage highlights God's unwavering expectation of radical obedience from His covenant people and His absolute faithfulness in executing both His promises of blessing for obedience and His warnings of judgment for defiance. The people's defiance here is not merely a political or strategic misstep but a deep spiritual betrayal, demonstrating a profound distrust in the LORD's sovereign care, wisdom, and power. Their journey to Tahpanhes is a tangible, physical manifestation of a heart that prioritizes fear, self-preservation, and human schemes over faith and humble submission to the divine voice.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Jeremiah 43:7 serves as a timeless and convicting mirror for believers across all generations, challenging us to deeply examine the true source of our trust, security, and guidance. In moments of fear, uncertainty, or perceived danger, our fallen human inclination might be to devise our own solutions, relying on human wisdom, personal resources, or worldly alliances that seem logical, expedient, or less demanding than God's way. However, this verse powerfully reminds us that true safety, genuine peace, and ultimate flourishing are found only in radical, unwavering obedience to God's voice, even when His commands seem counter-intuitive, demand significant sacrifice, or appear to lead us into greater vulnerability. The remnant's journey to Tahpanhes, a place of supposed refuge that tragically became a place of further judgment, warns us against seeking "Egypts" in our own lives—any worldly solution, comfort, or perceived escape that pulls us away from God's explicit will and revealed path. Our spiritual well-being, our peace of mind, and our ultimate destiny are inextricably linked to our willingness to listen attentively, obey humbly, and trust implicitly that God's path, though sometimes challenging or requiring great faith, is always the path of blessing, true deliverance, and eternal life.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what specific areas of my life am I currently tempted to seek security or solutions outside of God's revealed will, perhaps by relying on my own wisdom or worldly strategies?
  • How does my immediate response to fear, uncertainty, or perceived danger reveal the true object of my trust and the deepest loyalties of my heart?
  • Am I truly listening to "the voice of the LORD" through diligent engagement with His Word, fervent prayer, and wise spiritual counsel, or am I prone to rationalize disobedience when it conflicts with my personal desires, comfort, or fears?
  • What "Tahpanhes"—what perceived refuge or self-devised plan—might I be heading towards by prioritizing my own plans or anxieties over God's clear direction and promises?

FAQ

What was the "voice of the LORD" that they disobeyed?
Answer: The "voice of the LORD" refers to the explicit and unequivocal message God delivered through the prophet Jeremiah in Jeremiah 42. After ten days of seeking God's will, Jeremiah conveyed God's command to the remnant: they were to remain in the land of Judah, where God promised them protection, blessing, and restoration if they obeyed. Conversely, God issued a severe warning that if they went to Egypt, they would inevitably face the very sword, famine, and pestilence they feared, and would perish there. Despite this clear, divinely authoritative instruction, they chose to disregard it completely.

Why did the remnant choose to go to Egypt despite God's warning?
Answer: The text indicates that the remnant, particularly the "proud men" led by Johanan, did not genuinely trust God's word delivered through Jeremiah. They accused Jeremiah of speaking falsely, claiming he was influenced by Baruch to deliver a message that would lead to their demise at the hands of the Babylonians (Jeremiah 43:2-3). Their decision was primarily driven by intense fear of Babylonian reprisal and a desperate desire for perceived safety and sustenance in Egypt. This choice reflected a deep-seated lack of faith in God's ability or willingness to protect and provide for them in Judah, demonstrating a preference for human reasoning and worldly solutions over divine command.

What was Tahpanhes, and why is its mention significant?
Answer: Tahpanhes (also spelled Tehaphnehes or Hanes) was an important Egyptian frontier city located in the eastern Nile Delta, likely serving as a strategic military outpost or administrative center. Its mention in Jeremiah 43:7 is highly significant because it was the specific destination where the disobedient remnant settled. This act directly fulfilled God's earlier warning that if they went to Egypt, He would pursue them there with judgment. Later in Jeremiah, God pronounces further judgment upon the Jews in Egypt, specifically mentioning Tahpanhes as a place where Nebuchadnezzar, the Babylonian king, would set up his throne and conquer (Jeremiah 43:8-13). Thus, their chosen refuge, intended to provide safety, ironically became a focal point for further divine judgment and Babylonian conquest.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Jeremiah 43:7, with its poignant narrative of human disobedience and its dire consequences, finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment in several transformative ways. While the remnant of Judah chose to disobey the explicit "voice of the LORD" and desperately sought refuge in the fleeting, worldly strength of Egypt, Jesus Christ perfectly embodied radical, unwavering obedience to the Father's will. He did not seek His own way, worldly security, or escape from suffering, but declared, "I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will but to do the will of him who sent me" (John 6:38). Unlike the proud men who accused Jeremiah of deceit and rejected God's truth, Jesus is the faithful Prophet, the very Word of God incarnate, whose "voice" always leads to life, truth, and genuine freedom (John 10:27). The people's futile journey to Tahpanhes highlights the ultimate futility of seeking refuge or salvation in anything other than God; Christ, however, is the ultimate and true refuge, the one who offers genuine safety, peace, and deliverance from the judgment of sin and the perils of a fallen world (Psalm 46:1, Hebrews 6:18). Their disobedience led to further exile and an escalation of judgment, but Christ's perfect obedience, even to the agonizing point of death on a cross (Philippians 2:8), secured salvation, reconciliation, and true freedom for all who believe, bringing them into the promised spiritual land of God's presence and blessing, not through their own flawed efforts or worldly schemes, but through His finished, redemptive work.

Copy as

Commentary on Jeremiah 43 verses 1–7

What God said to the builders of Babel may be truly said of this people that Jeremiah is now dealing with: Now nothing will be restrained from them which they have imagined to do, Gen 11:6. They have a fancy for Egypt, and to Egypt they will go, whatever God himself says to the contrary. Jeremiah made them hear all he had to say, though he saw them uneasy at it; it was what the Lord their God had sent him to speak to them, and they shall have it all. And now let us see what they have to say to it.

I. They deny it to be a message from God: Johanan, and all the proud men, said to Jeremiah, Thou speakest falsely, Jer 43:2. See here, 1. What was the cause of their disobedience - it was pride; only by that comes contention both with God and man. They were proud men that gave the lie to the prophet. They could not bear the contradiction of their sentiments and the control of their designs, no, not by the divine wisdom, by the divine will itself. Pharaoh said, Who is the Lord, that I should obey him? Exo 5:2. The proud unhumbled heart of man is one of the most daring enemies God has on this side hell. 2. What was the colour for their disobedience. They would not acknowledge it to be the word of God: The Lord hath not sent thee on this errand to us. Either they were not convinced that what was said came from God or (which I rather think) though they were convinced of it they would not own it. The light shone strongly in their face, but they either shut their eyes against it or would not confess that they saw it. Note, The reason why men deny the scriptures to be the word of God is because they are resolved not to conform to scripture-rules, and so an obstinate infidelity is made the sorry subterfuge of a wilful disobedience. If God had spoken to them by an angel, or as he did from Mount Sinai, they would have said that it was a delusion. Had they not consulted Jeremiah as a prophet? Had he not waited to receive instructions from God what to say to them? Had not what he said all the usual marks of prophecy upon it? Was not the prophet himself embarked in the same bottom with them? What interests could he have separate from theirs? Had he not always approved himself an Israelite indeed? And had not God proved him a prophet indeed? Had any of his words ever fallen to the ground? Why, truly, they had some good thoughts of Jeremiah, but they suggest (Jer 43:3), Baruch sets thee on against us. A likely thing, that Baruch should be in a plot to deliver them into the hands of the Chaldeans; and what would he get by that? If Jeremiah and he had been so well affected to the Chaldeans as they would represent them, they would have gone away at first with Nebuzaradan, when he courted them, to Babylon, and not have staid to take their lot with this despised ungrateful remnant. But the best services are no fences against malice and slander. Or, if Baruch had been so ill disposed, could they think Jeremiah would be so influenced by him as to make God's name an authority to patronise so villainous a purpose? Note, Those that are resolved to contradict the great ends of the ministry are industrious to bring a bad name upon it. When men will persist in sin they represent those that would turn them from it as designing men for themselves, nay, as ill-designing men against their neighbours. It is well for persons who are thus misrepresented that their witness is in heaven and their record on high.

II. They determine to go to Egypt notwithstanding. They resolve not to dwell in the land of Judah, as God had ordered them (Jer 43:4), but to go themselves with one consent and to take all that they had under their power along with them to Egypt. Those that came from all the nations whither they had been driven, to dwell in the land of Judah, out of a sincere affection to that land, they would not leave to their liberty, but forced them to go with them into Egypt (Jer 43:5), men, women, and children (Jer 43:6), a long journey into a strange country, an idolatrous country, a country that had never been kind of faithful to Israel; yet thither they would go, though they deserted their own land and threw themselves out of God's protection. It is the folly of men that they know not when they are well off, and often ruin themselves by endeavouring to better themselves; and it is the pride of great men to force those they have under their power to follow them, though ever so much against their duty and interest. These proud men compelled even Jeremiah the prophet and Baruch his scribe to go along with them to Egypt; they carried them away as prisoners, partly to punish them (and a greater punishment they could not inflict upon them than to force them against their consciences; theirs is the worst of tyranny who say to men's souls, even to good men's souls, Bow down, that we may go over), partly to put some reputation upon themselves and their own way. Though the prophets were under a force, they would make the world believe that they were voluntary in going along with them; and who could have blamed them for acting contrary to the word of the Lord if the prophets themselves had acted so? They came to Tahpanhes, a famous city of Egypt (so called from a queen of that name, Kg1 11:19), the same with Hanes (Isa 30:4); it was now the metropolis, for Pharaoh's house was there, Jer 43:9. No place could serve these proud men to settle in but the royal city and near the court, so little mindful were they of Joseph's wisdom, who would have his brethren settle in Goshen. If they had had the spirit of Israelites, they would have chosen rather to dwell in the wilderness of Judah than in the most pompous populous cities of Egypt.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–7. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Jeremiah 43:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.