Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
In vain have I smitten your children; they received no correction: your own sword hath devoured your prophets, like a destroying lion.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
In vain H7723 have I smitten H5221 your children H1121; they received H3947 no correction H4148: your own sword H2719 hath devoured H398 your prophets H5030, like a destroying H7843 lion H738.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
"In vain have I struck down your people. They would not receive correction. Your own sword has devoured your prophets like a marauding lion.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
“I have struck your sons in vain; they accepted no discipline. Your own sword has devoured your prophets like a voracious lion.”
Ask
American Standard Version
In vain have I smitten your children; they received no correction: your own sword hath devoured your prophets, like a destroying lion.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
“I have struck your children in vain. They received no correction. Your own sword has devoured your prophets, like a destroying lion.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
I haue smitten your children in vaine, they receiued no correction: your owne sworde hath deuoured your Prophets like a destroying lyon.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
In vain I have smitten your sons, Instruction they have not accepted, Devoured hath your sword your prophets, As a destroying lion.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Jeremiah 2:30 captures the Lord's profound lament over Judah's spiritual recalcitrance and persistent rebellion. Despite God's repeated, loving attempts to discipline and correct His people through various means, they remained utterly unrepentant and unresponsive. The verse starkly reveals their ultimate rejection of divine instruction and their violent persecution of God's faithful prophets, culminating in a self-inflicted spiritual wound that mirrors the ferocity of a wild beast. It powerfully underscores the tragic, self-destructive consequences of ignoring divine warnings and actively silencing the very voices sent to guide them back to righteousness and covenant faithfulness.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Jeremiah 2:30 is situated within the prophet Jeremiah's opening pronouncements against Judah, serving as a poignant indictment of the nation's spiritual infidelity. Chapter 2 begins with God recalling Israel's initial devotion during the wilderness wanderings, a stark contrast to their present apostasy. The preceding verses detail Judah's abandonment of the Lord, the "fountain of living waters," for "broken cisterns that can hold no water" (Jeremiah 2:13). God enumerates their spiritual harlotry, their pursuit of foreign deities, and their refusal to acknowledge His provision and protection. Verse 30 specifically follows God's rhetorical questions about their transformation into a "degenerate plant" (Jeremiah 2:21) and their unashamed pursuit of idolatry, setting the stage for the declaration of judgment on their unresponsiveness to divine discipline.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Jeremiah prophesied during a period of immense geopolitical flux in Judah, spanning the late 7th to early 6th centuries BCE (circa 627-586 BCE). This era witnessed the decline of the Assyrian Empire and the ascendancy of Babylon, profoundly impacting Judah's political alliances and internal stability. Spiritually, despite King Josiah's earlier reforms, widespread idolatry, syncretism, and social injustice remained deeply entrenched in the culture. Practices such as Baal worship and even child sacrifice were tragically common, representing a profound deviation from the Mosaic covenant. Culturally, prophets served as crucial intermediaries, delivering God's messages of warning, correction, and hope. However, true prophets like Jeremiah often faced severe persecution, imprisonment, and even death for speaking uncomfortable truths, reflecting a deep-seated societal resistance to God's authority and His revealed word.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes prevalent in Jeremiah and the broader prophetic literature. Firstly, it highlights the theme of Divine Discipline and Human Stubbornness. God's "smiting" represents His various disciplinary actions—whether through natural disasters, foreign threats, or internal strife—all intended to bring His people to repentance. Yet, the lament "they received no correction" emphasizes Judah's hardened heart and persistent refusal to learn from these divine interventions. This stubbornness is a recurring motif throughout Jeremiah, underscoring the nation's spiritual blindness. Secondly, the verse underscores the tragic theme of the Rejection and Persecution of God's Messengers. The chilling accusation that "your own sword hath devoured your prophets" vividly portrays the violent opposition faced by those who faithfully delivered God's word, a pattern tragically consistent throughout Israel's history, culminating in the lament of Jesus over Jerusalem (Matthew 23:37). Finally, the verse speaks profoundly to the Self-Destructive Nature of Rebellion. By rejecting God's loving correction and actively harming His prophets, Judah was not merely offending God but actively bringing about its own demise, illustrating the biblical principle that sin, left unaddressed, ultimately devours its perpetrators.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Smitten (Hebrew, nâkâh', H5221): This primitive root signifies "to strike (lightly or severely, literally or figuratively)." Its range of meaning includes "beat," "kill," "slay," or "wound." In this context, it refers to God's intentional disciplinary actions or judgments upon His people, not with the primary goal of destruction, but for the purpose of correction and restoration. It implies a forceful, purposeful intervention by God into the affairs of Judah to capture their attention and turn them from their errant ways back to covenant faithfulness.
  • Correction (Hebrew, mûwçâr', H4148): This word properly means "chastisement," but figuratively extends to "reproof, warning or instruction," and even "restraint" or "discipline." It denotes the pedagogical and redemptive intent behind God's disciplinary acts. God's "smiting" was not arbitrary punishment but a form of divine education, designed to teach His people righteousness and lead them back into a right relationship with Him. The lament "they received no correction" highlights Judah's profound failure to learn from, or respond positively to, God's interventions.
  • Sword (Hebrew, chereb', H2719): This term refers to a "cutting instrument (from its destructive effect), as a knife, sword, or other sharp implement." While literally a weapon, in this metaphorical context, "your own sword" represents the self-inflicted harm and destructive consequences of Judah's own rebellious actions and choices. It symbolizes their internal corruption, their unjust legal systems, and their violent persecution of the righteous, particularly God's prophets, which ultimately led to their national downfall and spiritual ruin.

Verse Breakdown

  • "In vain have I smitten your children": This clause expresses God's profound frustration, sorrow, and disappointment. Despite His repeated and varied acts of discipline (the "smiting"), intended to bring His beloved "children" (the people of Judah) back to Him, these efforts proved utterly fruitless ("in vain"). God's disciplinary measures, whether through natural disasters, foreign invasions, or internal strife, failed to achieve their desired effect of repentance and spiritual renewal.
  • "they received no correction": This directly explains why God's efforts were "in vain." The people of Judah stubbornly refused to learn from their experiences or to heed the divine instruction embedded in God's chastisements. Their hearts remained hardened, impervious to the lessons God sought to impart through His disciplinary hand, demonstrating a profound spiritual deafness.
  • "your own sword hath devoured your prophets": This powerful and chilling accusation reveals the depth of Judah's rebellion and self-destructive nature. The "sword" here is metaphorical, representing the nation's internal violence, injustice, and self-inflicted policies. Instead of heeding the warnings and guidance of God's appointed messengers, the people, through their corrupt leaders and societal structures, actively persecuted, imprisoned, and even killed their prophets. This act of silencing God's voice was a profound betrayal and a direct assault on divine truth.
  • "like a destroying lion": This vivid simile intensifies the imagery of the previous clause. The persecution and destruction of the prophets were not merely acts of rejection but were carried out with the ferocity, mercilessness, and completeness of a "destroying lion" (a lion that ruins or lays waste) consuming its prey. It underscores the brutal, savage, and utterly devastating nature of Judah's treatment of those who spoke God's truth, highlighting the destructive power of their rebellion.

Literary Devices

Jeremiah 2:30 employs several powerful literary devices to convey its message of divine lament and human rebellion. The phrase "In vain have I smitten your children; they received no correction" utilizes hyperbole to emphasize the utter futility of God's disciplinary efforts in the face of Judah's extreme stubbornness. While God's actions are never truly "in vain" in His sovereign plan, the expression conveys His deep frustration and sorrow over their unresponsiveness. The most striking device is personification in "your own sword hath devoured your prophets." The "sword," representing the nation's internal corruption, injustice, and self-inflicted harm, is given the human-like action of "devouring," vividly portraying the self-destructive nature of their rebellion. This is immediately followed by a powerful simile: "like a destroying lion." This comparison effectively communicates the ferocity, mercilessness, and complete devastation with which Judah persecuted its own prophets, likening their actions to the brutal efficiency of a predatory beast. The combination of these devices paints a stark and unforgettable picture of Judah's profound spiritual decline and its tragic consequences.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Jeremiah 2:30 profoundly illustrates the biblical tension between God's persistent love and disciplinary action, and humanity's stubborn resistance to divine correction. It underscores the truth that God's discipline is always redemptive in intent, aimed at restoration and spiritual growth rather than mere punitive judgment. However, when such loving correction is repeatedly ignored, it reveals a profound spiritual blindness and hardness of heart that ultimately leads to self-destruction. The persecution of the prophets further highlights the tragic pattern of humanity rejecting God's direct communication, preferring comfortable lies or self-serving narratives over challenging truths. This rejection is not merely an act against the messenger but a direct affront to God Himself, cutting off the very lifeline of divine guidance and protection, and inviting inevitable judgment.

  • Matthew 23:37: "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!"
  • Hebrews 12:6: "For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth."
  • 2 Chronicles 36:15-16: "And the Lord God of their fathers sent to them by his messengers, rising up betimes, and sending; because he had compassion on his people, and on his dwelling place: But they mocked the messengers of God, and despised his words, and misused his prophets, until the wrath of the Lord arose against his people, till there was no remedy."

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Jeremiah 2:30 serves as a stark mirror, inviting us to examine our own responsiveness to God's voice and His corrective hand in our lives. It challenges us to consider whether we are truly open to divine instruction, even when it comes through uncomfortable circumstances, challenging words from Scripture, or the wise counsel of others. The "smiting" of God can manifest in various forms in our lives—a crisis that forces introspection, a deep conviction from the Holy Spirit, the loving rebuke of a trusted friend, or the natural consequences of our own choices. Are we quick to learn and repent, or do we, like ancient Judah, stubbornly resist correction, allowing our hearts to harden against divine truth? Furthermore, this verse calls us to value, respect, and protect those who faithfully speak God's truth, even when it is unpopular or confronts our comfortable paradigms. Silencing or dismissing prophetic voices, whether in our communities or in our personal lives, ultimately deprives us of the very guidance we need for spiritual health and flourishing. Our rebellion against God is never benign; it is a self-destructive act, a "sword" that ultimately devours our own well-being and spiritual vitality. May we cultivate a spirit of humility, receptivity, and prompt repentance, ensuring that God's loving discipline never falls "in vain" upon our lives.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what specific ways might God be "smiting" or disciplining me or my community today, and how am I receiving that correction?
  • Am I genuinely receptive to uncomfortable truths, especially when they come from God's Word or from those who faithfully speak on His behalf?
  • How do my own choices and actions, if rebellious or unrepentant, become a "sword" that harms my spiritual life or the lives of those around me?
  • What practical steps can I take to cultivate a more humble and repentant heart, one that is quick to respond to God's instruction and discipline?

FAQ

What does "In vain have I smitten your children" mean in the context of God's character?

Answer: This phrase does not imply that God's power or efforts are truly futile or that He is weak, but rather expresses His profound lament and frustration over Judah's unresponsiveness. It highlights the depth of their spiritual stubbornness and the tragedy of their missed opportunity. God, in His steadfast love and covenant faithfulness, repeatedly intervened with disciplinary actions ("smitten")—such as famine, drought, or military threats—intended to bring His people, whom He affectionately calls "your children," back to repentance and obedience. The "in vain" signifies that, from a human perspective, these efforts failed to produce the desired change in Judah's heart, despite God's consistent and loving attempts at correction. It underscores God's sorrow over their persistent rebellion, not a weakness in His divine will or power.

How did Judah's "own sword" devour their prophets?

Answer: The "sword" here is a powerful metaphor for the self-destructive nature of Judah's rebellion and its internal corruption. It refers to the nation's own unjust systems, violent actions, and societal rejection of God's truth-tellers. Instead of listening to the warnings and guidance of the true prophets whom God sent, the people, often led by corrupt kings and false prophets, actively persecuted, imprisoned, and even murdered them. This is evidenced throughout the Old Testament, where prophets like Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Uriah faced severe opposition and martyrdom. By silencing God's messengers, Judah effectively cut off its own source of divine wisdom and guidance, leading to its spiritual and national demise.

What is the significance of the "destroying lion" imagery?

Answer: The "destroying lion" (Hebrew, ʼărîy_ _shâchath') is a vivid simile that emphasizes the ferocity, mercilessness, and completeness of the persecution and destruction inflicted upon God's prophets by their own people. A lion is a powerful, predatory beast that hunts and devours its prey without mercy, leaving ruin and desolation in its wake. By comparing Judah's actions to a "destroying lion," Jeremiah underscores the brutal and utterly devastating nature of their rejection of divine truth. It conveys the idea that Judah's internal corruption, violence, and unbridled rebellion were as savage and destructive to its own spiritual health and to God's messengers as a lion is to its victim, leaving behind only ruin.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Jeremiah 2:30, with its profound lament over unheeded correction and the tragic persecution of prophets, finds its ultimate and most poignant fulfillment in the person and ministry of Jesus Christ. Just as God "smote" His children in vain through various forms of discipline, so too did God send His Son, the ultimate Prophet and embodiment of divine truth, into a world that largely rejected Him. Jesus Himself lamented over Jerusalem, echoing Jeremiah's sorrow: "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!" (Matthew 23:37). The "sword" that devoured the Old Testament prophets foreshadows the ultimate rejection and crucifixion of Christ, the very Son of God, by His own people (John 1:11). The parable of the wicked tenants in Matthew 21:33-46 powerfully illustrates this pattern: after sending many servants (prophets) who were beaten and killed, the landowner finally sent his son, whom they also seized and murdered. Yet, in God's paradoxical wisdom and redemptive plan, this ultimate act of rejection—the crucifixion—became the means of ultimate correction and salvation for humanity. Through Christ's atoning sacrifice, the "smiting" of God's righteous judgment was absorbed by the innocent Lamb, offering true correction and redemption to all who would finally receive it. Thus, the pattern of rejected prophets culminates in the rejected Christ, whose suffering and resurrection provide the only true escape from the self-devouring "sword" of sin and rebellion. He is the one through whom God truly speaks, and in Him, the divine "correction" is not in vain, but brings forth eternal life and reconciliation (Hebrews 1:1-2).

Copy as

Commentary on Jeremiah 2 verses 29–37

The prophet here goes on in the same strain, aiming to bring a sinful people to repentance, that their destruction might be prevented.

I. He avers the truth of the charge. It was evident beyond contradiction; it was the greatest absurdity imaginable in them to think of denying it (Jer 2:29): "Wherefore will you plead with me, and put me upon the proof of it, or wherefore will you go about to plead any thing in excuse of the crime or to obtain a mitigation of the sentence? Your plea will certainly be overruled, and judgment given against you: you know you have all transgressed, one as well as another; why then to you quarrel with me for contending with you?"

II. He heightens it from the consideration both of their incorrigibleness and of their ingratitude. 1. They had not been wrought upon by the judgments of God which they had been under (Jer 2:30): In vain have I smitten your children, that is, the children or people of Judah. They had been under divine rebukes of many kinds. God therein designed to bring them to repentance; but it was in vain. They did not answer God's end in afflicting them; their consciences were not awakened, nor their hearts softened and humbled, nor were they driven to seek unto God; they received no instruction by the correction, were not made the better by it; and it is a great loss thus to lose an affliction. They did not receive, they did not submit to, or comply with, the correction, but their hearts fretted against the Lord, and so they were smitten in vain. Even the children, the young people, among them (so it may be taken), were smitten in vain; they were so soon prejudiced against repentance that they were as untractable as the old ones that had been long accustomed to do evil. 2. They had not been wrought upon by the word of God which he had sent them in the mouth of his servants the prophets; nay, they had killed the messengers for the sake of the message: "Your own sword has devoured your prophets like a destroying lion; you have put them to death for their faithfulness with as much rage and fury, and with as much greediness and pleasure, as a lion devours his prey." Their prophets, who were their greatest blessings, were treated by them as if they had been the plagues of their generation, and this was their measure-filling sin, Ch2 36:16. They killed their own prophets, Th1 2:15. 3. They had not been wrought upon by the favours God had bestowed upon them (Jer 2:31): "O generation!" (he does not call them, as he might, O faithless and perverse generation! O generation of vipers! but speaks gently, O you men of this generation!) "see the word of the Lord, do not only hear it, but consider it diligently, apply your minds closely to it." As we are bidden to hear the rod (Mic 6:9), for that has its voice, so we are bidden to see the word, for that has its visions, its views. It intimates that what is here said is plain and undeniable; you may see it to be very evident; it is written as with a sun-beam, so that he that runs may read it: Have I been a wilderness to Israel, a land of darkness. Note, None of those who have had any dealings with God ever had reason to complain of him as a wilderness or a land of darkness. He has blessed us with the fruits of the earth, and therefore we cannot say that he has been a wilderness to us, a dry and barren land, that (as Mr. Gataker expresses it) he has held us to hard meat, as cattle fed upon the common. No; his sheep have been led into green pastures. He has also blessed us with the lights of heaven, and has not withheld them, so that we cannot say, He has been to us a land of darkness. He has caused his sun to shine, as well as his rain to fall, upon the evil and unthankful. Or the meaning is, in general, that the service of God has not been to any either an unpleasant or an unprofitable service. God sometimes has led his people through a wilderness and a land of darkness, but he himself was then to them all that which they needed; he so fed them with manna, and led them by a pillar of fire, that it was to them a fruitful field and a land of light. The world is, to those who make it their home and their portion, a wilderness and a land of darkness, vanity and vexation of spirit; but those that dwell in God have the lines fallen to them in pleasant places. 4. Instead of being wrought upon by these, they had grown intolerably insolent and imperious. They say, We are lords; we will come no more unto thee. Now that they had become a potent kingdom, or thought themselves such, they set up for themselves, and shook off their dependence upon God. This is the language of presumptuous sinners, and it is not only very impious and profane, but very unreasonable and foolish. (1.) It is absurd for us who are subjects to say, We are lords (that is, rulers) and we will come no more to God to receive commands form him; for, as he is King of old, so he is King for ever, and we can never pretend to be from under his authority. (2.) It is absurd for us who are beggars to say, We are lords, that is, We are rich, and we will come no more to God, to receive favours from him, as if we could live without him and need not be beholden to him. God justly takes it ill when those to whom he has been a bountiful benefactor care not either for hearing from him or speaking to him.

III. He lays the blame of all their wickedness upon their forgetting God (Jer 2:32): They have forgotten me; they have industriously banished the thoughts of God out of their minds, jostled those thoughts out with thoughts of their idols, and avoided all those things that would put them in mind of God. 1. Though they were his own people, in covenant with him and professing relation to him, and had the tokens of his presence in the midst of them and of his favour to them, yet they forgot him. 2. They had long neglected him, days without number, time out of mind, as we say. They had not for a great while entertained any serious thoughts of him; so that they seem quite to have forgotten him, and resolved never to remember him again. How many days of our lives have passed without suitable remembrance of God! Who can number those empty days? 3. They had not had such a regard and affection to him as young ladies generally have to their fine clothes: Can a maid forget her ornaments or a bride her attire? No; their hearts are upon them; they value them so much, and themselves upon them, that they are ever and anon thinking and speaking of them. When they are to appear in public they do not forget any of their ornaments, but put every one in its place, as they are described, Isa 3:18, etc. And yet my people have forgotten me. It is sad that any should be more in love with their fine clothes than with their God, and should rather leave their religion behind them, or part with that, than leave any of their ornaments behind them, or part with them. Is not God our ornament? Is he not a crown of glory and a diadem of beauty to his people? Did we look upon him to be so, and upon our religion as an ornament of grace to our head and chains about our neck (Pro 1:9), we should be as mindful of them as ever any maid was of her ornaments, or a bride of her attire, we should be as careful to preserve them and as fond to appear in them.

IV. He shows them what a bad influence their sins had had upon others. The sins of God's professing people harden and encourage those about them in their evil ways, especially when they appear forward and ringleaders in sin (Jer 2:33): Why trimmest thou thy way to seek love? There is an allusion here to the practice of lewd women who strive to recommend themselves by their ogling looks and gay dress, as Jezebel, who painted her face and tired her head. Thus had they courted their neighbours into sinful confederacies with them and communion in their idolatries, and had taught the wicked ones their ways, their ways of mixing God's institutions with their idolatrous customs and usages, which was a great profanation of that which was sacred and made the ways of their idolatry worse than that of others. Those have a great deal to answer for who, by their fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, make wicked ones more wicked than otherwise they would be.

V. He charges them with the guilt of murder added to the guilt of their idolatry (Jer 2:34): Also in thy skirts is found the blood of the souls, the life-blood of the poor innocents, which cried to heaven, and for which God was now making inquisition. The reference is to the children that were offered in sacrifice to Moloch; or it may be taken more generally for all the innocent blood which Manasseh shed, and with which he had filled Jerusalem (Kg2 21:16), the righteous blood, especially the blood of the prophets and others that witnessed against their impieties. This blood was found not by secret search, not by diggings (so the word is), but upon all these; it was above ground. This intimates that the guilt of this kind which they had contracted was certain and evident, not doubtful or which would bear a dispute; and that it was avowed and barefaced, and which they had not so much sense either of shame or fear as to endeavour to conceal, which was a great aggravation of it.

VI. He overrules their plea of, Not guilty. Though this matter be so plain, yet thou sayest, Because I am innocent, surely his anger shall turn from me; and again, Thou sayest, I have not sinned (Jer 2:35); therefore I will plead with thee, and will convince thee of thy mistake. Because they deny the charge, and stand upon their own justification, therefore God will join issue with them and plead with them, both by his word and by his rod. Those shall be made to know how much they deceive themselves, 1. Who say that they have not offended God, that they are innocent, though they have been guilty of the grossest enormities. 2. Who expect that God will be reconciled to them though they do not repent and reform. They own that they had been under the tokens of God's anger, but they think that it was causeless, and that they by pleading innocency had proved it to be so, and therefore they conclude that God will immediately let fall his action and his anger shall be turned from them. This is very provoking, and God will plead with them, and convince them that his anger is just, for they have sinned, and he will never cease his controversy till they, instead of justifying themselves thus, humble, and judge, and condemn themselves.

VII. He upbraids them with the shameful disappointments they met with, in making creatures their confidence, while they made God their enemy, Jer 2:36, Jer 2:37. It was a piece of spiritual idolatry they were often guilty of that they trusted in an arm of flesh and their hearts therein departed from the Lord. Now here he shows them the folly of it. 1. They were restless, and unsatisfied in the choice of their confidences: "Why gaddest thou about so much to change thy way? Doubtless it is because thou meetest not with that in those thou didst confide in which thou promisedst thyself." Those that make God their hope, and walk in a continual dependence upon him, need not gad about to change their way; for their souls may return to him, and repose in him, as their rest: but those that trust in creatures will be perpetually uneasy, like Noah's dove, that found no rest for the sole of her foot. Every thing they trust to fails them, and then they think to change for the better, but they will be still disappointed. They first trusted to Assyria, and, when that proved a broken reed, they depended upon Egypt, and that proved no better. Creatures being vanity, they will be vexation of spirit to all those that put their confidence in them; they gad about, seeking rest and finding none. 2. They were quite disappointed in the confidences they made choice of; so the prophet tells them they should be: Thou shalt be ashamed of Egypt, which thou now trustest in, as formerly thou wast of Assyria, who distressed them and helped them not, Ch2 28:20. The Jews were a peculiar people in their profession of religion, and for that reason none of the neighbouring nations cared for them, nor could heartily love them; and yet the Jews were still courting them, and confiding in them, and were well enough served when deceived by them. See what will come of it (Jer 2:37): Thou shalt go forth from him, thy ambassadors or envoys shall return from Egypt re infect - disappointed, and therefore with their hands upon their heads, lamenting the desperate condition of their people. Or, Thou shalt go forth hence, that is, into captivity in a strange land, with thy hands upon thy head, holding it because it aches (ubi dolor ibi digitus - where the pain is the finger will be applied), or as people ashamed, for Tamar, in the height of her confusion, laid her hand on her head, Sa2 13:19. "And Egypt, that thou reliest on, shall not be able to prevent it nor to rescue thee out of captivity." Those that will not lay their hand on their heart in godly sorrow, which works life, shall be made to lay their hand on their head in the sorrow of the world, which works death. And no wonder that Egypt cannot help them, when God will not, If the Lord do not help thee, whence should I? The Egyptians are broken reeds, for the Lord has rejected thy confidences; he will not make use of them for thy relief, will neither so far honour them, nor so far give countenance to thy confidence in them, as to appoint them to be the instruments of any good to thee, and therefore thou shalt not prosper in them; they shall not stand thee in any stead nor give thee any satisfaction. As there is no counsel or wisdom that can prevail against the Lord, so there is none that can prevail without him. Some read it, The Lord has rejected thee for thy confidences; because thou hast dealt so unfaithfully with him as to trust in his creatures, nay, in his enemies when thou shouldst have trusted in him only, he has abandoned thee to that destruction from which thou thoughtest thus to shelter thyself; and then thou canst not prosper, for none ever either hardened himself against God or estranged himself from God and prospered.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 29–37. Public domain.
Copy as
Ephrem the SyrianAD 373
COMMENTARY ON TATIAN’S DIATESSARON 14:26
Behold, for three years I have come seeking fruit on this fig tree. This refers to the three captivities in which the Israelites were taken away as captives, so that they might be chastened, but they were not chastened. In vain have I smitten your children, but they have not taken correction. To show that even after these things he was still patient, he said to the vinedresser, Cut it down. The vinedresser replied to him, Leave it, Lord, for another year. He agreed to be patient with the Israelites.
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Jeremiah
(Verse 30) Without cause, I struck your sons: they did not receive discipline. For this reason, you did not receive the 70. And the sense in Hebrew is: Those who were struck did not want to receive discipline. But in the Septuagint: Therefore, I struck your sons so that you may be taught by their death. And lest you say: You did not want to correct sinners, learn from the blows inflicted upon your sons, because I desired to heal you with a more severe remedy.


Your sword devoured your prophets. Not mine, but yours: not my sword, but yours, devoured, which you endured for your sins. Moreover, the 70 do not have yours: but they have simply interpreted 'your sword devoured your prophets' to show either an enemy sword or my sword, through which your sins were stabbed.

As a destructive lion is your generation. LXX: As a destructive lion, and you did not fear. The sword, he says, which devoured your prophets; undoubtedly this signifies Baal and the soothsayers of idols, like a lion he ravaged everything: and yet your generation, which should have improved through the punishment of a few, continued in all wickedness. But in the Septuagint the sense is this: The sword of the Lord, which showed the sword of the adversaries, devoured and tore apart your false prophets, like a lion, which fiercely tears apart the prey it finds, and yet you were not able to be converted to better things through the punishment of your prophets.
Augustine of HippoAD 430
LETTER 93:1.3
“Some of those measures do not succeed,” you say. Is a remedy, then, to be discontinued because the illness of some patients is incurable? You are looking at those who are so hardened that they are not affected by such correction. Concerning these it has been written: “In vain have I struck your children. They have not received correction.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Jeremiah 2:30 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.