Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
It came also in the days of Jehoiakim the son of Josiah king of Judah, unto the end of the eleventh year of Zedekiah the son of Josiah king of Judah, unto the carrying away of Jerusalem captive in the fifth month.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
It came also in the days H3117 of Jehoiakim H3079 the son H1121 of Josiah H2977 king H4428 of Judah H3063, unto the end H8552 of the eleventh H6249 H6240 year H8141 of Zedekiah H6667 the son H1121 of Josiah H2977 king H4428 of Judah H3063, unto the carrying away H1540 of Jerusalem H3389 captive H1540 in the fifth H2549 month H2320.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
It also came during the days of Y'hoyakim the son of Yoshiyahu, king of Y'hudah, continuing until the eleventh year of Tzidkiyahu the son of Yoshiyahu, king of Y'hudah, right up until the time Yerushalayim was carried away captive, in the fifth month.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
and through the days of Jehoiakim son of Josiah king of Judah, until the fifth month of the eleventh year of Zedekiah son of Josiah king of Judah, when the people of Jerusalem went into exile.
Ask
American Standard Version
It came also in the days of Jehoiakim the son of Josiah, king of Judah, unto the end of the eleventh year of Zedekiah, the son of Josiah, king of Judah, unto the carrying away of Jerusalem captive in the fifth month.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
It came also in the days of Jehoiakim the son of Josiah, king of Judah, to the end of the eleventh year of Zedekiah, the son of Josiah, king of Judah, to the carrying away of Jerusalem captive in the fifth month.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And also in the dayes of Iehoiakim the sonne of Iosiah King of Iudah vnto the ende of the eleuenth yeere of Zedekiah, the sonne of Iosiah King of Iudah, euen vnto the carying away of Ierusalem captiue in the fift moneth.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and it is in the days of Jehoiakim son of Josiah, king of Judah, till the completion of the eleventh year of Zedekiah son of Josiah, king of Judah, till the removal of Jerusalem in the fifth month.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Jeremiah 1:3 meticulously outlines the precise historical period of the prophet Jeremiah's active ministry, spanning from the tumultuous reign of King Jehoiakim, through the entirety of King Zedekiah's rule, and culminating in the devastating Babylonian exile of Jerusalem. This verse serves as a critical chronological marker, grounding Jeremiah's prophetic warnings and pronouncements within the final, tragic decades of the Kingdom of Judah, leading directly to its ultimate downfall and the "carrying away of Jerusalem captive."

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse immediately follows the introductory statements of Jeremiah 1:1-2, which establish the prophet's identity, lineage, and the initial phase of his calling during the reign of King Josiah. While verse 2 broadly mentions Josiah's time, Jeremiah 1:3 narrows the focus significantly, providing a more precise and extended timeline for Jeremiah's public ministry. It shifts from the hopeful, albeit brief, period of Josiah's reforms to the subsequent reigns of Jehoiakim and Zedekiah, characterized by increasing apostasy and political instability. This chronological framing sets the stage for the book's subsequent prophecies of judgment, lament, and eventual restoration, emphasizing that Jeremiah's words were delivered consistently over decades, culminating in the very catastrophe he foretold. The precise historical markers underscore the divine authority and fulfillment of his difficult message, demonstrating that God's word is not subject to human whims but operates within the unfolding of history.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The period described in Jeremiah 1:3, from Jehoiakim's reign (609-598 BC) to Zedekiah's eleventh year (586 BC), was one of profound geopolitical upheaval and moral decay for Judah. Following the death of the righteous King Josiah, Judah became a precarious pawn between the declining Assyrian empire, the rising Babylonian power, and the resurgent Egyptian influence. Jehoiakim, appointed by Pharaoh Neco II, notoriously reversed many of Josiah's reforms, embracing idolatry and oppressing his people. His reign saw the first Babylonian deportation (605 BC). Zedekiah, Judah's last king, was a weak and indecisive ruler who vacillated between submission to Babylon and rebellion, ultimately leading to the final, catastrophic siege and destruction of Jerusalem in 586 BC. Culturally, this era was marked by a pervasive rejection of the Mosaic covenant, widespread idolatry, social injustice, and a deep-seated resistance to prophetic warnings, despite the clear and repeated messages from Jeremiah and other prophets. The "carrying away of Jerusalem captive" refers to the final and most devastating of the three waves of Babylonian deportations, which saw the destruction of the Temple and the city, and the exile of its inhabitants, marking a cataclysmic end to Judah's independence.
  • Key Themes: Jeremiah 1:3 contributes significantly to several overarching themes within the book of Jeremiah and the broader prophetic literature. Firstly, it highlights the theme of Divine Patience and Persistent Warning, as God's message of repentance was delivered over many years through Jeremiah before the final judgment fell, demonstrating His reluctance to punish. Secondly, it underscores the theme of Covenant Unfaithfulness and Inevitable Judgment, demonstrating that Judah's persistent rebellion against God's covenant, particularly under Jehoiakim and Zedekiah, ultimately led to the foretold consequences of exile and destruction, a theme powerfully articulated in the curses of Deuteronomy 28. Thirdly, the verse marks the End of an Era for the Davidic monarchy and the independent Kingdom of Judah, signaling a profound shift in Israelite history and theology. This historical precision emphasizes the Reliability of God's Word, as Jeremiah's prophecies, initially met with scorn and persecution, were ultimately fulfilled in devastating detail, as tragically recounted in 2 Kings 25.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • carrying away (Hebrew, gâlâh', H1540): From a primitive root meaning "to denude (especially in a disgraceful sense); by implication, to exile (captives being usually stripped); figuratively, to reveal." This word vividly portrays the humiliation and stripping away of Judah's identity, land, and sovereignty through forced deportation. It's not merely a physical removal but a profound act of divine judgment that reveals the consequences of their unfaithfulness. The nuance of "uncovering" or "revealing" also subtly points to the exposure of Judah's sin before God and the nations, leaving them vulnerable and shamed.
  • days (Hebrew, yôwm', H3117): From an unused root meaning "to be hot"; "a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term)." In this context, "days" refers to the entire duration or period of the reigns of Jehoiakim and Zedekiah, encompassing the full extent of Jeremiah's ministry leading up to the exile. It emphasizes the extended timeframe over which God's warnings were issued and Judah's rebellion persisted, highlighting God's long-suffering patience despite their protracted disobedience.
  • son (Hebrew, bên', H1121): From בָּנָה (bânâh, "to build"); "a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etc.)." Here, "son" explicitly defines the lineage of Jehoiakim and Zedekiah as "son of Josiah." This is significant because Josiah was a righteous king, yet his sons, despite their noble heritage, led Judah into deeper apostasy and ruin. This highlights the personal responsibility of each king and the tragic decline of the Davidic line in its final years, despite the promise of a lasting dynasty, underscoring that spiritual heritage does not guarantee faithfulness.

Verse Breakdown

  • "It came also in the days of Jehoiakim the son of Josiah king of Judah": This clause establishes the initial phase of the extended period of Jeremiah's prophetic activity, following the prophet's initial call during Josiah's reign (Jeremiah 1:2). The mention of Jehoiakim, a wicked king who reversed many of his righteous father Josiah's reforms, immediately signals a period of spiritual decline and sets the stage for the coming judgment. The lineage "son of Josiah" serves as a poignant contrast, emphasizing Jehoiakim's failure to follow his father's godly example.
  • "unto the end of the eleventh year of Zedekiah the son of Josiah king of Judah": This specifies the full duration of Jeremiah's active ministry, extending through the reign of Zedekiah, the last of Josiah's sons to sit on the throne. Zedekiah's eleventh year (586 BC) marks the culmination of Judah's persistent rebellion and the final, devastating siege of Jerusalem. The repetition of "the son of Josiah king of Judah" for Zedekiah further reinforces the tragic irony of the Davidic line leading its people to destruction, despite having a righteous progenitor.
  • "unto the carrying away of Jerusalem captive in the fifth month": This phrase pinpoints the precise historical climax and the ultimate fulfillment of Jeremiah's prophecies of judgment. "Carrying away of Jerusalem captive" refers to the final Babylonian deportation, which included the destruction of the city and the Temple. The specific mention of the "fifth month" (the Hebrew month of Av) is a somber detail, marking the traditional date of the Temple's destruction, a day of national mourning for centuries to come, underscoring the profound and lasting impact of this divine judgment.

Literary Devices

Jeremiah 1:3 employs several literary devices to convey its profound message and establish the historical veracity of Jeremiah's prophetic work. Chronological Framing is paramount, as the verse meticulously outlines the precise historical boundaries of Jeremiah's ministry, grounding his prophecies in verifiable events and underscoring their eventual fulfillment. The repetition of "the son of Josiah king of Judah" for both Jehoiakim and Zedekiah serves as a form of Anaphora and Repetition, emphasizing the continuity of the Davidic line while simultaneously highlighting the tragic decline from Josiah's righteousness. This repetition also creates a powerful sense of Irony, as these sons of a godly king led the nation to its ruin. The phrase "unto the carrying away of Jerusalem captive" acts as a powerful Foreshadowing and Climax, succinctly summarizing the devastating outcome that the subsequent prophecies will detail. The inclusion of the "fifth month" adds a layer of Historical Precision and Pathos, marking a date that would become synonymous with national calamity and mourning, deepening the emotional weight of the divine judgment.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Jeremiah 1:3 profoundly underscores the theological principle of divine justice and the dire consequences of persistent covenant unfaithfulness. It reveals God's long-suffering patience in sending His prophet over decades, yet also His unwavering commitment to His word, both in warning and in judgment. The tragic culmination in the "carrying away of Jerusalem captive" is not merely a political or military defeat, but a profound theological event—the righteous judgment of a holy God upon a rebellious people who repeatedly rejected His grace and warnings. This historical precision roots the prophetic message in tangible reality, affirming that God interacts with human history and holds nations accountable for their moral and spiritual choices. The verse sets the stage for understanding the depth of Judah's sin and the severity of God's response, which ultimately served as a painful, yet necessary, purification, intended to lead a remnant back to Him.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Jeremiah 1:3 serves as a stark and sobering reminder that divine warnings are not empty threats, and persistent disobedience carries severe consequences. The extended timeline of Jeremiah's ministry, culminating in the exile, powerfully illustrates God's immense patience and His persistent, loving call to repentance before judgment falls. For believers today, this passage emphasizes the critical importance of heeding God's word, not just intellectually, but with genuine obedience and a repentant heart. It challenges us to examine our own lives and communities: are we listening to the prophetic voice of Scripture? Are we taking seriously the warnings against sin and idolatry, both personal and corporate? The fall of Judah, despite its rich heritage and divine promises, demonstrates that privilege does not exempt from accountability. Our response to God's truth, over time, shapes our destiny, urging us to cultivate a posture of humility and responsiveness to His ongoing guidance.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the long duration of Jeremiah's ministry, as highlighted in this verse, speak to God's patience and His desire for repentance?
  • In what ways might we, individually or as a church, be prone to ignoring or dismissing God's warnings today?
  • What are the "captivities" or consequences we might face when we persistently turn away from God's revealed will?

FAQ

What was the significance of the "fifth month" mentioned in this verse?

Answer: The "fifth month" refers to the Hebrew month of Av, which corresponds to July/August in the Gregorian calendar. This specific mention is highly significant because it was in the fifth month of 586 BC that the Babylonian army, under Nebuzaradan, destroyed the Temple of Jerusalem and the city walls, completing the final phase of the Babylonian conquest. This date became a profound day of national mourning and fasting for the Jewish people for generations, commemorated annually (e.g., Zechariah 7:3). Its inclusion here underscores the historical precision and the devastating climax of the events Jeremiah prophesied, marking an indelible scar on the nation's memory.

Why are Jehoiakim and Zedekiah, both sons of Josiah, specifically named as the kings during Jeremiah's ministry leading to the exile?

Answer: The naming of Jehoiakim and Zedekiah is crucial for several reasons. Firstly, it provides a precise historical framework for Jeremiah's prophetic activity, showing that his ministry spanned the entire period of Judah's final decline. Secondly, it highlights the tragic irony of their reigns. Both were sons of King Josiah, a righteous king who led significant reforms and sought to restore Judah to covenant faithfulness. Yet, Jehoiakim and Zedekiah largely reversed their father's efforts, leading Judah deeper into idolatry, political instability, and rebellion against God. Their reigns represent the final, decisive rejection of God's covenant by the Davidic monarchy and the people, ultimately sealing the nation's fate and demonstrating that even a godly heritage does not guarantee faithfulness; personal choices in response to God's word are paramount.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Jeremiah 1:3 details the historical judgment upon Judah, it implicitly points to the greater redemptive narrative culminating in Christ. The "carrying away of Jerusalem captive" signifies a profound spiritual and physical bondage, a consequence of sin and covenant unfaithfulness. This earthly exile, however, foreshadows a deeper spiritual captivity—humanity's enslavement to sin and death, from which no earthly king or kingdom could deliver. The failure of the Davidic kings, Jehoiakim and Zedekiah, to lead their people in righteousness ultimately highlights the desperate need for a perfect, eternal King. Jesus Christ, the true Son of David and the ultimate fulfillment of the Davidic covenant, is the one who ultimately delivers His people from their spiritual captivity. He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, offering true freedom and restoration that the return from Babylonian exile could only partially symbolize. His coming inaugurates a new covenant, where the law is written on hearts (Jeremiah 31:31-34), and true peace and security are found not in an earthly Jerusalem, but in the heavenly Jerusalem, established by His perfect sacrifice and eternal reign. The judgment on Judah, though severe, was part of God's sovereign plan to preserve a remnant through whom the Messiah would come, ultimately fulfilling all the promises of restoration and new life in Himself.

Copy as

Commentary on Jeremiah 1 verses 1–3

We have here as much as it was thought fit we should know of the genealogy of this prophet and the chronology of this prophecy. 1. We are told what family the prophet was of. He was the son of Hilkiah, not that Hilkiah, it is supposed, who was high priest in Josiah's time (for then he would have been called so, and not, as here, one of the priests that were in Anathoth), but another of the same name. Jeremiah signifies one raised up by the Lord. It is said of Christ that he is a prophet whom the Lord our God raised up unto us, Deu 18:15, Deu 18:18. He was of the priests, and, as a priest, was authorized and appointed to teach the people; but to that authority and appointment God added the extraordinary commission of a prophet. Ezekiel also was a priest. Thus God would support the honour of the priesthood at a time when, by their sins and God's judgments upon them, it was sadly eclipsed. He was of the priests in Anathoth, a city of priests, which lay about three miles from Jerusalem. Abiathar had his country house there, Kg1 2:26. 2. We have the general date of his prophecies, the knowledge of which is requisite to the understanding of them. (1.) He began to prophesy in the thirteenth year of Josiah's reign, Jer 1:2. Josiah, in the twelfth year of his reign, began a work of reformation, applied himself with all sincerity to purge Judah and Jerusalem from the high places, and the groves, and the images, Ch2 34:3. And very seasonably then was this young prophet raised up to assist and encourage the young king in that good work. Then the word of the Lord came to him, not only a charge and commission to him to prophesy, but a revelation of the things themselves which he was to deliver. As it is an encouragement to ministers to be countenanced and protected by such pious magistrates as Josiah was, so it is a great help to magistrates, in any good work of reformation, to be advised and animated, and to have a great deal of their work done for them, by such faithful zealous ministers as Jeremiah was. Now, one would have expected when these two joined forces, such a prince, and such a prophet (as in a like case, Ezr 5:1, Ezr 5:2), and both young, such a complete reformation would be brought about and settled as would prevent the ruin of the church and state; but it proved quite otherwise. In the eighteenth year of Josiah we find there were a great many of the relics of idolatry that were not purged out; for what can the best princes and prophets do to prevent the ruin of a people that hate to be reformed? And therefore, though it was a time of reformation, Jeremiah continued to foretel the destroying judgments that were coming upon them; for there is no symptom more threatening to any people than fruitless attempts of reformation. Josiah and Jeremiah would have healed them, but they would not be healed. (2.) He continued to prophesy through the reigns of Jehoiakim and Zedekiah, each of whom reigned eleven years. He prophesied to the carrying away of Jerusalem captive (Jer 1:3), that great event which he had so often prophesied of. He continued to prophesy after that, Jer 40:1. But the computation here is made to end with that because it was the accomplishment of many of his predictions; and from the thirteenth of Josiah to the captivity was just forty years. Dr. Lightfoot observes that as Moses was so long with the people, a teacher in the wilderness, till they entered into their own land, Jeremiah was so long in their own land a teacher, before they went into the wilderness of the heathen: and he thinks that therefore a special mark is set upon the last forty years of the iniquity of Judah, which Ezekiel bore forty days, a day for a year, because during all that time they had Jeremiah prophesying among them, which was a great aggravation of their impenitency. God, in this prophet, suffered their manners, their ill manners, forty years, and at length swore in his wrath that they should not continue in his rest.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–3. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Jeremiah
(Chapter 1, Verses 1 onwards) The words of Jeremiah son of Hilkiah concerning the priests who were in Anathoth in the land of Benjamin: the word of the Lord that came to him in the days of Josiah son of Amon, king of Judah, in the thirteenth year of his reign. And it came to pass in the days of Jehoiakim son of Josiah, king of Judah, until the end of the eleventh year of Zedekiah son of Josiah, king of Judah, until the exile of Jerusalem, in the fifth month. The other prophets, such as Isaiah, Hosea, and Joel, were before the captivity of the ten tribes of Israel, or of the two tribes, Judah and Benjamin. Others were after the captivity, such as Daniel, Haggai, and Zechariah. However, Jeremiah and Ezekiel prophesied as the captivity was imminent: one of them in the land of Judah, the other in Babylon. Jeremiah began prophesying when he was still a young boy, in the thirteenth year of the reign of Josiah, the son of Amon, king of Judah. And he prophesied during his reign for nineteen years, and afterwards under his son Joachim for eleven years, and under Zedekiah, who was the last of the kings of Judah, for eleven years, until the fifth month when Jerusalem was taken by the Babylonians. But the three months of Joachaz and Jehoiachin (one of whom was taken to Egypt and the other was taken with his mother to Babylon) are included in the aforementioned years: thus, from the beginning of his prophecy until the captivity of Jerusalem, in which he himself was also taken captive, he prophesied for forty-one years, except for the time when he was taken to Egypt. Here, he prophesied in Taphnis, as is contained in this very volume. According to the words of Jeremiah, the Septuagint placed, 'The word of the LORD that came to Jeremiah' (Jeremiah 43:8), in this sense, that the words of Jeremiah are the word of the LORD. He belonged to the class of priests who lived opposite the north of Jerusalem, in the third mile, and the village of Anathoth. At the same time, there was the wonderful mercy of the LORD, that even with the captivity approaching and the Babylonian army besieging Jerusalem, He still prompts the people to repentance, preferring to save the converted rather than to destroy the sinners. Regarding the transmigration, which all others have translated with a consistent voice, the Seventy have expressed captivity. But after the beginning of Jeremiah's prophecy, in the thirty-fifth year of his prophecy, Ezekiel, who was in Babylon with those who had been captured with him, began to prophesy.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Jeremiah 1:3 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.