Skip to content
“Warning Against Favoritism and Partiality”· James 2:1–13
Translation
King James Version
For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
For G1063 he that said G2036, Do G3431 not G3361 commit adultery G3431, said G2036 also G2532, Do G5407 not G3361 kill G5407. Now G1161 if G1487 thou commit G3431 no G3756 adultery G3431, yet if G1161 thou kill G5407, thou art become G1096 a transgressor G3848 of the law G3551.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
For the One who said, “Don’t commit adultery,” also said, “Don’t murder.” Now, if you don’t commit adultery but do murder, you have become a transgressor of the Torah.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
For He who said, “Do not commit adultery,” also said, “Do not murder.” If you do not commit adultery, but do commit murder, you have become a lawbreaker.
Ask
American Standard Version
For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou dost not commit adultery, but killest, thou art become a transgressor of the law.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
For he who said, “Do not commit adultery,” also said, “Do not commit murder.” Now if you do not commit adultery, but murder, you have become a transgressor of the law.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
For he that saide, Thou shalt not commit adulterie, saide also, Thou shalt not kill. Nowe though thou doest none adulterie, yet if thou killest, thou art a transgressour of the Lawe.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
for He who is saying, `Thou mayest not commit adultery,' said also, `Thou mayest do no murder;' and if thou shalt not commit adultery, and shalt commit murder, thou hast become a transgressor of law;
Ask
In the KJVVerse 30,305 of 31,102 · 97.4%

Study This Verse

Summary

James 2:11 powerfully illustrates the indivisible nature of God's law, asserting that the divine commands are a unified whole originating from a single Lawgiver. By using the examples of adultery and murder, the apostle James demonstrates that to violate even one commandment is to become a "transgressor of the law" in its entirety, thereby challenging any notion of selective obedience and underscoring the absolute standard of God's righteousness.

Context

Literary Context

James 2:11 is an integral part of James's broader argument in James chapter 2 concerning the relationship between faith and works, and specifically against the sin of partiality. James has just introduced the "royal law" of loving one's neighbor as oneself in James 2:8 and condemned favoritism as a transgression of this very law in James 2:9. Verse 11 directly builds upon the preceding statement in James 2:10, which declares that "whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all." James then uses two specific commandments from the Decalogue—"Do not commit adultery" and "Do not kill"—to illustrate that the Law originates from one divine Lawgiver, and therefore, disrespecting one part is disrespecting the whole. This serves to reinforce the gravity of any sin and the comprehensive nature of God's moral demands.

Historical & Cultural Context

The audience for James's letter was primarily Jewish Christians dispersed among the nations, as indicated by the salutation in James 1:1. These believers would have been deeply familiar with the Mosaic Law, including the Ten Commandments, which formed the bedrock of their ethical and religious understanding. In the Greco-Roman world, various philosophical schools often debated the hierarchy of virtues and vices, and some might have considered certain transgressions less severe than others. However, James's argument cuts against such human distinctions, grounding the law's authority in its divine origin. His emphasis on the unity of the law would have resonated with the Jewish understanding of Torah as a comprehensive, integrated revelation of God's will, where breaking any part was an affront to the Lawgiver.

Key Themes

This verse contributes significantly to several key themes within James's epistle and broader biblical theology. Firstly, it profoundly emphasizes The Indivisibility of God's Law, asserting that God's law is a unified whole, not a collection of independent suggestions from which one can pick and choose. Breaking even one command, whether perceived as "minor" or "major" by human standards, is an offense against the same divine authority. Secondly, it highlights Sin as Transgression, clearly defining sin not merely as a mistake or imperfection, but as a deliberate "transgression" or violation of God's revealed will. This underscores that all sins are serious in God's eyes because they are affronts to His holy character and His sovereign rule. Lastly, the verse reinforces the Unity of the Lawgiver, implicitly pointing to God as the singular source of all commandments ("he that said"). This means that to break any part of the law is to rebel against the one who gave the law, making every sin an act of defiance against God Himself, a concept foundational to understanding the need for grace and redemption as seen in passages like Romans 3:23.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

said épō' G2036

This word (G2036) is a primary verb meaning "to speak or say (by word or writing)." In this context, it refers to the divine utterance of God's commands. James's repetition of "he that said" emphasizes the singular, authoritative source of both commandments, underscoring that the same divine voice pronounced both "Do not commit adultery" and "Do not kill." This reinforces the unity and indivisibility of the Law, as it all proceeds from the same holy Lawgiver.

become gínomai' G1096

This verb (G1096) means "to cause to be," or reflexively, "to become (come into being)." Here, it signifies a change in state or identity. When one transgresses even a single point of the law, they "become" or are constituted as a transgressor of the entire law. It's not merely that they committed a transgression, but that their very standing before the law is altered; they are now definitively a "lawbreaker" in God's sight, highlighting the profound implications of sin.

transgressor parabátēs' G3848

Derived from a word meaning "to step across," this noun (G3848) literally means "a violator" or "one who steps beyond the boundary." It powerfully conveys the idea of violating a divine standard or overstepping a divinely appointed limit. This term emphasizes that sin is not merely a failure to perform, but an active, deliberate violation of a clear, established command, reinforcing the gravity of any sin as an act of rebellion against God's holy boundaries.

Verse Breakdown

"For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill."

This opening clause establishes the premise of James's argument: the divine origin and unified authority of the Mosaic Law. By attributing both commandments to the same singular "He" (God), James asserts that the Law is not a collection of disparate rules but an integrated expression of God's character and will. The specific commandments against adultery and murder are chosen as prominent examples from the Decalogue, illustrating that all commandments share the same divine weight and source.

"Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill,"

This clause presents a hypothetical scenario to drive home the point. It acknowledges that an individual might meticulously obey one command (e.g., not committing adultery) while failing in another (e.g., committing murder). The "Now if" (Greek: ei) introduces a logical step in the argument, setting up the inevitable conclusion. The juxtaposition highlights the human tendency to categorize sins, which James immediately dismantles.

"thou art become a transgressor of the law."

This is the conclusive statement, revealing the profound implication of the preceding hypothetical. Regardless of one's obedience in other areas, a single act of transgression against any part of God's unified law renders one a "transgressor" of the entire law. This means that sin is not measured by its perceived severity but by its offense against the singular, holy Lawgiver. It underscores the absolute nature of God's standard and humanity's universal failure to meet it perfectly.

Literary Devices

James employs several potent Literary Devices to convey his message. The most prominent is Parallelism, specifically antithetical parallelism, by juxtaposing "Do not commit adultery" with "Do not kill." This structure highlights the equivalent weight and divine origin of seemingly different commandments, underscoring that both are equally binding and equally from God. Furthermore, James utilizes Argument by Illustration, using these two specific, well-known commandments from the Decalogue to represent the entirety of God's law. This is a form of Synecdoche, where two parts stand for the whole, effectively demonstrating that a breach in any single command constitutes a breach of the entire divine code. The entire verse functions as a Logical Deduction, moving from the premise of a singular Lawgiver to the conclusion that a violation of any part of His law makes one guilty of violating the whole, thereby dismantling any human-made hierarchy of sins.

Theological and Thematic Connections

James 2:11 serves as a foundational text for understanding the nature of God's law and humanity's relationship to it. It dismantles the human tendency to compartmentalize sin, revealing that all sin, regardless of its perceived severity, is an offense against the singular, holy character of God. Because God is the unified source of all commandments, a transgression against any one of them is an affront to His entire being and authority. This verse highlights the absolute standard of divine righteousness, demonstrating that perfect obedience is required, and any deviation renders one a "transgressor." This theological truth underscores humanity's universal need for grace and a righteousness that comes from outside themselves, as no one can perfectly uphold the law.

Matthew 5:17-18Jesus affirms that He did not come to abolish the Law but to fulfill it, emphasizing its enduring validity and comprehensive nature.
Galatians 3:10Paul echoes James's point, stating that "cursed is everyone who does not abide by all things written in the Book of the Law, and do them," reinforcing the all-or-nothing demand of the Law.
Romans 3:20Paul clarifies that "by works of the law no human being will be justified in his sight, since through the law comes knowledge of sin," aligning with James's implication that the law reveals our inability to achieve righteousness on our own.

Reflection and Application

James 2:11 is a stark reminder of the profound holiness of God and the serious nature of sin, challenging our often-casual approach to moral transgression. It calls us to abandon the dangerous human tendency to categorize sins into "big" and "small," or to believe that obedience in some areas can compensate for disobedience in others. In God's eyes, any transgression makes one a lawbreaker, revealing the depth of human fallenness and the universal need for divine grace. This verse should cultivate profound humility within us, recognizing our utter inability to perfectly keep God's law and our absolute dependence on the atoning work of Jesus Christ for salvation. For believers, it encourages a consistent pursuit of holiness across all areas of life, not just those sins we deem more egregious. It promotes a holistic approach to Christian living, striving to honor God in every thought, word, and deed, empowered by the Holy Spirit, understanding that true love for God means honoring His entire will.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what areas of my life do I tend to categorize sins as "minor" or "less serious" than others?
  2. How does the indivisibility of God's law challenge my understanding of personal righteousness and my need for Christ?
  3. What specific steps can I take to cultivate a more consistent and holistic obedience to God's entire will, rather than just selective adherence?

FAQ

Does James 2:11 mean that all sins are equally severe in God's eyes?

James 2:11 emphasizes that all sins, regardless of their perceived severity by human standards, are equally an offense against the singular, unified Lawgiver. The point is not that the consequences of all sins are the same (e.g., murder has different societal and personal consequences than lying), but that any sin makes one a "transgressor of the law" in God's sight. It highlights that the Law is a whole, and to break any part of it is to break the whole, because it is an offense against the one who gave the Law. So, while there may be degrees of consequence, there are no "small" sins in terms of their impact on our standing before a holy God. This foundational truth underscores our universal need for God's grace and mercy, as revealed through Jesus Christ.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

James 2:11, by exposing the indivisible nature of God's law and humanity's universal failure to keep it, powerfully points to the absolute necessity of Christ. The verse reveals that all humanity stands condemned as "transgressors of the law," not merely for specific heinous acts, but for any single deviation from God's perfect standard. This profound truth sets the stage for the glorious gospel of Jesus Christ. He is the only one who perfectly fulfilled the entire Law, living a life of flawless obedience where humanity utterly failed (Matthew 5:17). Furthermore, Christ, as the Lamb of God, bore the full penalty for our transgressions, taking upon Himself the curse of the Law that we deserved (Galatians 3:13). Through His atoning sacrifice on the cross, He provided the perfect righteousness that we lack, which is imputed to all who believe (Romans 4:5). Therefore, James 2:11, while exposing our guilt, ultimately magnifies the saving work of Christ, who perfectly satisfied the Law's demands and offers complete forgiveness and a new standing before God to all who trust in Him (Romans 8:3-4).

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers James 2:8–13. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 6 verses
Passage under commentJames 2:8–13
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

The apostle, having condemned the sin of those who had an undue respect of persons, and having urged what was sufficient to convict them of the greatness of this evil, now proceeds to show how the matter may be mended; it is the work of a gospel ministry, not only to reprove and warn, but to teach and direct. Col 1:28, Warning every man, and teaching every man. And here,

I.We have the law that is to guide us in all our regards to men set down in general.

If you fulfil the royal law, according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, you do well, Jam 2:8. Lest any should think James had been pleading for the poor so as to throw contempt on the rich, he now lets them know that he did not design to encourage improper conduct towards any; they must not hate nor be rude to the rich, any more than despise the poor; but as the scripture teaches us to love all our neighbours, be they rich or poor, as ourselves, so, in our having a steady regard to this rule, we shall do well. Observe hence,

1.The rule for Christians to walk by is settled in the scriptures: If according to the scriptures, etc. It is not great men, nor worldly wealth, nor corrupt practices among professors themselves, that must guide us, but the scriptures of truth.

2.The scripture gives us this as a law, to love our neighbour as ourselves; it is what still remains in full force, and is rather carried higher and further by Christ than made less important to us.

3.This law is a royal law, it comes from the King of kings. Its own worth and dignity deserve it should be thus honoured; and the state in which all Christians now are, as it is a state of liberty, and not of bondage or oppression, makes this law, by which they are to regulate all their actions to one another, a royal law.

4.A pretence of observing this royal law, when it is interpreted with partiality, will not excuse men in any unjust proceedings. In is implied here that some were ready to flatter rich men, and be partial to them, because, if they were in the like circumstances, they should expect such regards to themselves; or they might plead that to show a distinguished respect to those whom God in his providence had distinguished by their rank and degree in the world was but doing right; therefore the apostle allows that, so far as they were concerned to observe the duties of the second table, they did well in giving honour to whom honour was due; but this fair pretence would not cover their sin in that undue respect of persons which they stood chargeable with; for,

II.This general law is to be considered together with a particular law:

"If you have respect to persons, you commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors, Jam 2:9. Notwithstanding the law of laws, to love your neighbour as yourselves, and to show that respect to them which you would be apt to look for yourselves if in their circumstances, yet this will not excuse your distributing either the favours or the censures of the church according to men's outward condition; but here you must look to a particular law, which God, who gave the other, has given you together with it, and by this you will stand fully convicted of the sin I have charged you with." This law is in Lev 19:15, Thou shalt do no unrighteousness in judgment; thou shalt not respect the person of the poor nor the person of the mighty; but in righteousness shalt though judge thy neighbour. Yea, the very royal law itself, rightly explained, would serve to convict them, because it teaches them to put themselves as much in the places of the poor as in those of the rich, and so to act equitably towards one as well as the other. Hence he proceeds,

III.To show the extent of the law, and how far obedience must be paid to it.

They must fulfil the royal law, have a regard to one part as well as another, otherwise it would not stand them in stead, when they pretended to urge it as a reason for any particular actions: For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, is guilty of all, Jam 2:10. This may be considered,

1.With reference to the case James has been upon: Do you plead for your respect to the rich, because you are to love your neighbour as yourselves? Why then show also an equitable and due regard to the poor, because you are to love your neighbour as yourself: or else your offending in one point will spoil your pretence of observing that law at all. Whosoever shall keep the whole law, if he offend in one point, wilfully, avowedly, and with continuance, and so as to think he shall be excused in some matters because of his obedience in others, he is guilty of all; that is, he incurs the same penalty, and is liable to the same punishment, by the sentence of the law, as if he had broken it in other points as well as that he stands chargeable with. Not that all sins are equal, but that all carry the same contempt of the authority of the Lawgiver, and so bind over to such punishment as is threatened on the breach of that law. This shows us what a vanity it is to think that our good deeds will atone for our bad deeds, and plainly puts us upon looking for some other atonement.

2.This is further illustrated by putting a case different from that before mentioned (Jam 2:11): For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now, if thou commit no adultery, yet, if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law. One, perhaps, is very severe in the case of adultery, or what tends to such pollutions of the flesh; but less ready to condemn murder, or what tends to ruin the health, break the hearts, and destroy the lives, of others: another has a prodigious dread of murder, but has more easy thoughts of adultery; whereas one who looks at the authority of the Lawgiver more than the matter of the command will see the same reason for condemning the one as the other. Obedience is then acceptable when all is done with an eye to the will of God; and disobedience is to be condemned, in whatever instance it be, as it is a contempt of the authority of God; and, for that reason, if we offend in one point, we contemn the authority of him who gave the whole law, and so far are guilty of all. Thus, if you look to the law of the old, you stand condemned; for cursed is every that continueth not in all things that are written in the book of the law to do them, Gal 3:10.

IV.James directs Christians to govern and conduct themselves more especially by the law of Christ.

So speak and so do as those that shall be judged by the law of liberty, Jam 2:12. This will teach us, not only to be just and impartial, but very compassionate and merciful to the poor; and it will set us perfectly free from all sordid and undue regards to the rich. Observe here,

1.The gospel is called a law. It has all the requisites of a law: precepts with rewards and punishments annexed; it prescribes duty, as well as administers comfort; and Christ is a king to rule us as well as a prophet to teach us, and a priest to sacrifice and intercede for us. We are under the law to Christ.

2.It is a law of liberty, and one that we have no reason to complain of as a yoke or burden; for the service of God, according to the gospel, is perfect freedom; it sets us at liberty from all slavish regards, either to the persons or the things of this world.

3.We must all be judged by this law of liberty. Men's eternal condition will be determined according to the gospel; this is the book that will be opened, when we shall stand before the judgment-seat; there will be no relief to those whom the gospel condemns, nor will any accusation lie against those whom the gospel justifies.

4.It concerns us therefore so to speak and act now as become those who must shortly be judged by this law of liberty; that is, that we come up to gospel terms, that we make conscience of gospel duties, that e be of a gospel temper, and that our conversation be a gospel conversation, because by this rule we must be judged.

5.The consideration of our being judged by the gospel should engage us more especially to be merciful in our regards to the poor (Jam 2:13): For he shall have judgment without mercy that hath shown no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. Take notice here,

(1.)The doom which will be passed upon impenitent sinners at last will be judgment without mercy; there will be no mixtures or allays in the cup of wrath and of trembling, the dregs of which they must drink.

(2.)Such as show no mercy now shall find no mercy in the great day. But we may note, on the other hand,

(3.)That there will be such as shall become instances of the triumph of mercy, in whom mercy rejoices against judgment: all the children of men, in the last day, will be either vessels of wrath or vessels of mercy. It concerns all to consider among which they shall be found; and let us remember that blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Five Centuries of Reception

2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

2 quotes · AD 449–990
Post-NiceneEarly Medieval
5006007008009001000

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

AD 449Hilary of ArlesPost-NiceneSourceINTRODUCTORY TRACTATE ON THE LETTER OF JAMES
Why does James choose these two commandments as his examples? Because they are the ones which deal most closely with loving and with hating one’s neighbors.
AD 990OecumeniusEarly MedievalSourceCommentary on James
And whosoever shall keep the whole Law, but offends in one: is made guilty of all. For he that said, You shall not commit adultery, said also, You shall not kill. And if you do not commit adultery, but shall kill: you are made a transgressor of the Law. So speak, and so do, as beginning to be judged by the law of liberty. For judgment without mercy to him that has not done mercy. And mercy exalts itself above judgment.
"but offends in one." James said this concerning love, for the sake of which he also discussed all the preceding discourse at greater length for the sake of proof. But he said, "You shall not commit adultery, you shall not kill," for example. Consider, however, that the examples are from the law, insofar as it contributed to love. For he who loves his neighbor perfectly will neither commit adultery nor kill. For these are his who is affected with a hostile spirit towards his neighbor. Since it would not be said in this way, no one among men would be saved, since no one keeps the integrity of the commandments in all things. For he who has preserved chastity for the sake of the word has sometimes been overcome by anger; and he who is adorned with almsgiving has perhaps been obscured by envy. Therefore, it is not said of anyone who has no defect in virtues, but of love, that it should not be attained with defect due to respect for persons, but wholly. However, we also speak of these virtues. For one who has not perfectly adhered to modest or just matters, for example, but has used them with a deficiency, here, staggering in dealing with virtues, has been corrupted in the whole body of virtue. The law must therefore be understood as dealing with love, which is its chief aim. But the law of freedom says that it is without regard to persons: this is the law of Christ. For he who respects persons is not free, but a slave: “For by whom anyone is overcome, to him he is also enslaved." (2 Peter 2:19)
"For judgment without mercy to him that has not done mercy." If we have forgiven our neighbors the sins they have committed against us, and have made the needy among us sharers in our alms, then God’s mercy will deliver us from judgment. God will also welcome the merciful. Indeed, it is a remarkable deed, just as on the other hand, a serious condemnation will be for those who have not been well and piously disposed towards the people of their own class. For those who remain unmoved by any feeling of sympathy towards their neighbors who have wronged them, the condemnation of the evil servant will embrace them, together with the retribution that the Lord's Prayer designates. For there we ask God to forgive us as we forgive those who have sinned against us. And those who are hard-hearted, moved by no feeling of mercy towards those who lack bodily comfort, will also receive judgment without mercy according to the present discourse.
“mercy exalts itself above judgment.” For the merciful shall obtain mercy, according to the judgment of the Lord. (Matt. 5:7) Furthermore, if in an idolater's mercy towards the poor he can erase sins, as we learned in Daniel (Dan. 4:24), what would he not do in faithful men? But this mercy seems to me to accomplish something like this oil from the manna trees, anointed on athletes. For this enables them to escape, lest they be held by their adversaries: and so also in the universal judgment our mercy towards the needy will enable them to escape the attacks and dangers which will threaten us from the demons who accuse us. In another way.
“judgment without mercy.” The cause of restitution is against those who have shown pride and arrogance with great cruelty towards the lower classes with respect to persons. Therefore, it softens their cruelty and hardness, with this terrifying sentence, as if it were saying: The law commands you to love your neighbor as yourself: just as no one regards a person with respect to themselves (for that would be insane), so neither should you regard a person. But if, out of arrogance and hardness, you deviate towards respect for persons, fear that in some way you too might receive similar treatment from a just judge, and exclude from yourself that mercy: for judgment without mercy, etc.
“And mercy exalts itself above judgment.” That is, it conquers, subdues, dulls, or blunts.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying James 2:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.