Ezra 2:61
“Those Whose Status Was Uncertain”Ezra 2:59–63
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- וּמִבְּנֵיu·mi·be·Neiand of [the] descendants ofH1121Conj-w ¦ Prep-m ¦ N-mpcNoun Plural Masculine Constructוּandמִofבְּנֵי[the] descendants of
- הַכֹּהֲנִיםha·Ko·ha·Nimthe priestsH3548Art ¦ N-mpNoun Plural Masculine Absoluteהַtheכֹּהֲנִיםpriests
- בְּנֵיbe·Nei[the] descendants ofH1121N-mpcNoun Plural Masculine Construct
- חֳבַיָּהchoai·YahHobaiahH2252N-proper-mNoun Proper Masculine
- בְּנֵיbe·Nei[the] descendants ofH1121N-mpcNoun Plural Masculine Construct
- הַקּוֹץha·KotzHakkozH6976N-proper-mNoun Proper Masculine
- בְּנֵיbe·Nei[the] descendants ofH1121N-mpcNoun Plural Masculine Construct
- בַרְזִלַּיvar·zi·LaiBarzillaiH1271N-proper-mNoun Proper Masculine
- אֲשֶׁר'a·SherwhoH834RelParticle Relative
- לָקַחLa·kachhe had takenH3947V-Qal-Perf-3msVerb Qal Perfect 3rd Singular Masculine
- מִבְּנוֹתmi·be·Notone of [the] daughters ofH1323Prep-m ¦ N-fpcNoun Plural Feminine Constructמִone ofבְּנוֹת[the] daughters of
- בַּרְזִלַּיbar·zi·LaiBarzillaiH1271N-proper-mNoun Proper Masculine
- הַגִּלְעָדִיha·gil·'a·Dithe GileaditeH1569Art ¦ N-msNoun Gentilic Singular Masculine AbsoluteהַtheגִּלְעָדִיGileadite
- אִשָּׁה'i·Shaha wifeH802N-fsNoun Singular Feminine Absolute
- וַיִּקָּרֵאvai·yi·ka·Re'and he was calledH7121Conj-w ¦ V-Niphal-ConsecImperf-3msVerb Niphal Consecutive Imperfect 3rd Singular Masculineוַandיִּקָּרֵאhe was called
- עַל'alonH5921PrepPreposition
- שְׁמָםshe·Mamtheir nameH8034N-msc ¦ 3mpNoun Singular Masculine Construct with suffixשְׁמָnameםtheir
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era map

Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Ezra 2:36–63. He set out his notes in a three-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
Here is an account, I. Of the priests that returned, and they were a considerable number, about a tenth part of the whole company: for the whole were above 42,000 (Ezra 2:64), and four families of priests made up above 4200 (Ezra 2:36-39); thus was the tenth God's part - a blessed decimation. Three of the fathers of the priests here named were heads of courses, 1 Chronicles 24:7, 1 Chronicles 24:8, 1 Chronicles 24:14. The fourth was Pashur, v. 38. If these were of the posterity of that Pashur that abused Jeremiah (Jeremiah 20:1), it is strange that so bad a man should have so good a seed, and so numerous.
II.Of the Levites.
I cannot but wonder at the small number of them, for, taking in both the singers and the porters (Ezra 2:40-42), they did not make 350. Time was when the Levites were more forward to their duty than the priests (2 Chronicles 29:34), but they were not so now. If one place, one family, has the reputation for pious zeal now, another may have it another time. The wind blows where it listeth, and shifts its points.
III.Of the Nethinim, who, it is supposed, were the Gibeonites, given (so their name signifies) by Joshua first (Joshua 9:27), and again by David (Ezra 8:20), when Saul had expelled them, to be employed by the Levites in the work of God's house as hewers of wood and drawers of water; and, with them, of the children of Solomon's servants, whom he gave for the like use (whether they were Jews or Gentiles does not appear) and who were here taken notice of among the retainers of the temple and numbered with the Nethinim, Ezra 2:55, Ezra 2:58. Note, It is an honour to belong to God's house, though in the meanest office there.
IV.Of some that were looked upon as Israelites by birth, and others as priests, and yet could not make out a clear title to the honour.
1.There were some that could not prove themselves Israelites (Ezra 2:59, Ezra 2:60), a considerable number, who presumed they were of the seed of Jacob, but could not produce their pedigrees, and yet would go up to Jerusalem, having an affection to the house and people of God. These shamed those who were true-born Israelites, and yet were not called Israelites indeed, who came out of the waters of Judah (Isaiah 48:1), but had lost the relish of those waters.
2.There were others that could not prove themselves priests, and yet were supposed to be of the seed of Aaron. What is not preserved in black and white will, in all likelihood, be forgotten in a little time. Now we are here told,
(1.)How they lost their evidence. One of their ancestors married a daughter of Barzillai, that great man whom we read of in David's time; he gloried in an alliance to that honourable family, and, preferring that before the dignity of his priesthood, would have his children called after Barzillai's family, and their pedigree preserved in the registers of that house, not of the house of Aaron, and so they lost it. In Babylon there was nothing to be got by the priesthood, and therefore they cared not for being akin to it. Those who think their ministry, or their relation to ministers, a diminution or disparagement to them, forget who it was that said, I magnify my office.
(2.)What they lost with it. It could not be taken for granted that they were priests when they could not produce their proofs, but they were, as polluted, put from the priesthood. Now that the priests had recovered their rights, and had the altar to live upon again, they would gladly be looked upon as priests. But they had sold their birthright for the honour of being gentlemen, and therefore were justly degraded, and forbidden to eat of the most holy things. Note, Christ will be ashamed of those that are ashamed of him and his service. It was the tirshatha, or governor, that put them under this sequestration, which some understand of Zerubbabel the present governor, others of Nehemiah (who is so called, Nehemiah 8:9, Nehemiah 10:1, and who gave this order when he came some years after); but the prohibition was not absolute, it was only a suspension, till there should be a high priest with Urim and Thummin, by whom they might know God's mind in this matter. This, it seems, was expected and desired, but it does not appear that ever they were blessed with it under the second temple. They had the canon of the Old Testament complete, which was better than Urim; and, by the want of that oracle, they were taught to expect the Messiah the great Oracle, which the Urim and Thummim was but a type of. Nor does it appear that the second temple had the ark in it, either the old one or a new one. Those shadows by degrees vanished, as the substance approached; and God, by the prophet, intimates to his people that they should sustain no damage by the want of the ark, Jeremiah 3:16, Jeremiah 3:17. In those days, when they shall call Jerusalem the throne of the Lord, and all the nations shall be gathered to it, they shall say no more, The ark of the covenant of the Lord, neither shall it come to mind, for they shall do very well without it.
Continue studying Ezra 2:61 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
Three priestly families are named, among them the sons of Barzillai, whose ancestor married a daughter of Barzillai the Gileadite and took that family’s name.
“And of the children of the priests:”
A second group, of priestly families, with the same difficulty.
“the children of Habaiah, the children of Koz, the children of Barzillai;”
Three priestly families whose names were missing from the records.
“which took a wife of the daughters of Barzillai the Gileadite,”
An ancestor married into the family of David’s loyal friend from Gilead, a house outside the priesthood.
“and was called after their name:”
He took his wife’s family name, and with it the family’s priestly descent passed out of sight.
Passage studyEzra 2:59–63
Returnees Who Could Not Prove Their Descent
Summary
Near the end of the long register of exiles who came home from Babylon, Ezra records two groups whose place was in doubt. Six hundred fifty-two people from five places in Babylonia were unable to show that their families belonged to Israel. Three families of priests searched the written genealogies for their names in vain and were put out of the priesthood. The governor ruled that they must keep away from the most holy food until a priest stood up with Urim and with Thummim to ask God. These five verses show how seriously the returning people took God’s worship and their place among his people, and how they left the last word with God.
Why did the returning exiles keep such careful records?
A family’s descent decided a great deal for the people who came home. Ezra 2 lists, family by family, those who returned to Judah with Zerubbabel and Jeshua after Cyrus allowed them to go (Ezra 1). God had promised through Jeremiah, “after seventy years be accomplished at Babylon I will visit you, and perform my good word toward you, in causing you to return to this place” (Jeremiah 29:10). Through Isaiah he had said, “I will bring thy seed from the east, and gather thee from the west” (Isaiah 43:5–6), and Ezekiel heard him promise to open his people’s graves and place them in their own land (Ezekiel 37:12–14). Each name and number in this chapter belongs to the record of those promises kept.
After decades away, descent placed a man in his tribe, backed his claim to his family’s land, and decided who might serve at God’s altar. Israel had been counted by tribe and by the house of their fathers since the wilderness (Numbers 1). God gave the priesthood to Aaron and his sons (Exodus 28:1), had them consecrated to it (Exodus 29), and appointed them to wait on the priest’s office (Numbers 3:10). So the priestly families are listed with care earlier in the chapter (Ezra 2:36–42), and the people of this register went on to build the altar and lay the foundation of the temple (Ezra 3).
The list in Ezra 2:1–60 names families, Levites, singers, porters and temple servants with their numbers. These verses close it with the people whose names raised a question, and the same two groups appear in the parallel list in Nehemiah 7:61–63.
Who were unable to show that they were of Israel?
Six hundred fifty-two returning exiles, of the families of Delaiah, Tobiah and Nekoda, were unable to prove their descent. Verse 59 names the places they came up from: Telmelah, Telharsa, Cherub, Addan and Immer, towns in Babylonia where they had lived during the exile. They made the journey with everyone else. What they lacked was proof of where they belonged.
“Their father’s house” stands for the Hebrew bêth ʼâb. The word ʼâb is father, and it can also mean a forefather or the chief of a family. The word bayith is a house, and also a household, a family or even a dynasty. Together they name the extended family or clan, the basic unit of Israel’s life, through which a man knew his tribe, his land and his place in worship. Their “seed” is zeraʻ, the word for seed or grain that is sown, which is also used for offspring. Here it means their line of descent. The verb “shew”, nâgad, means to make something known or declare it. These families were unable to declare, with records to back it, which house they came from.
The last phrase carries the weight of it: “whether they were of Israel”. The doubt touched their very place among the people of God.
The families of Delaiah, Tobiah and Nekoda
Verse 60 names the three families, “the children of” each, and gives their number together: six hundred fifty and two. “Children” is bên, son, so these are the sons, the descendants, of each named ancestor. Delaiah, Dᵉlâyâh, joins a verb for drawing up or delivering to Yah, a short form of Yᵉhôvâh, and means “the LORD has delivered”. Tobiah, Ṭôwbîyâh, means “goodness of the LORD”. Nekoda, Nᵉqôwdâʼ, comes from a root meaning “marked” and means “distinguished”. Two of these names speak of the LORD’s deliverance and goodness, which fits a people he had just brought home.
These 652 were written into the register even though their question stayed open. They were counted, and they came up with the rest.
Why does Nehemiah give a different number?
The parallel list gives 642 for the same three families (Nehemiah 7:62), and the lists in Nehemiah 7 and Ezra 2 differ in small ways elsewhere as well. The likeliest explanations are a slip in copying the numbers, a different way of counting (heads in one place, households in another), or lists drawn up at slightly different stages of the return. The families, the shape of the list and the size of the community agree in both books.
Why were three families of priests put out of the priesthood?
They were put out because their names were missing from the written genealogies of the priests. Verse 61 turns from the people to “the children of the priests”. The word is kôhên, the Hebrew word for a priest, here the sons of Aaron. Three families are named: Habaiah, Koz and Barzillai.
The third is explained. An ancestor of that family “took a wife of the daughters of Barzillai the Gileadite, and was called after their name”. Barzillai the Gileadite was the wealthy and loyal man of Gilead who brought food and supplies to David and his men when David fled from Absalom (2 Samuel 17:27–29). He was highly honoured, and he was a layman. The name, Barzillay, comes from the word for iron and means “iron-hearted”. It stands twice in this verse, once for the priestly family and once for the Gileadite whose name they took.
The verb qârâʼ means to call or to name, and here the priest “was called” by his wife’s family name. Scripture leaves his reason unstated. Marrying into a lay family of Israel was within the law, which limited a priest’s marriage in other ways (Leviticus 21:7) and limited the high priest’s more narrowly still (Leviticus 21:13–15). The difficulty came with the name. Once the family was known as the sons of Barzillai, the record of their descent from Aaron passed out of sight, and generations later their sons were unable to prove it.
Verse 62 tells what happened when they tried: “These sought their register among those that were reckoned by genealogy”. To seek, bâqash, is to search out or look for something. Their “register” is kâthâb, from the verb to write: something written, a record or a book. They looked for their own entry in the written genealogies of the priests, “but they were not found”. So “were they, as polluted, put from the priesthood”. The priesthood, kᵉhunnâh, is the office of priest with all its work and privilege, and they were set outside it. Nehemiah 7:64 records the same decision.
Does “polluted” mean they had sinned?
“Polluted” describes their standing for the priest’s office. The verb gâʼal means to soil or defile, and here the defilement is ritual: lacking proof of descent from Aaron, they were treated as unfit for the holy work and kept from it. The verse charges them with no wrongdoing. God’s law taught Israel to “put difference between holy and unholy, and between unclean and clean” (Leviticus 10:10), and the laws for priests in Leviticus 21 guarded the altar closely.
Those laws also kept a son of Aaron with a blemish back from offering (Leviticus 21:16–23). These men stood in a like position, set apart from the sacred work for a reason that lay outside their own conduct, and as the next verse shows, the matter was left open for God to decide.
What did the Tirshatha forbid, and until when?
The governor forbade them the priests’ holy food until God’s answer could be had through the Urim and Thummim. “Tirshatha”, Tirshâthâʼ, is a Persian title for a governor, the deputy who ruled Judah for the Persian king. Ezra leaves him unnamed here. He is commonly taken to be Zerubbabel, who led this first return and was of David’s royal line. A governor of the province gave a ruling in a matter of worship, and he used his authority to uphold the law of God.
He told these men “that they should not eat of the most holy things”. The word qôdesh means a holy place or thing, and the Hebrew here sets it beside its own plural, “holiness of holinesses”, the highest degree of holiness. The most holy things were the portions of the offerings set apart for the priests alone to eat: the showbread, and parts of the sin offerings, trespass offerings and meat offerings that were left over from the altar. Eating them belonged to the priest’s portion and marked his place before God. The law guarded the priests’ holy food from anyone outside the priest’s household (Leviticus 22:10–16), so a man whose priesthood was in doubt was kept from it.
The ban had an end in view: “till there stood up a priest with Urim and with Thummim”. The governor treated the claim as a matter for God to settle. When a priest could ask the LORD in the way God had given, the answer would decide whether these families were sons of Aaron, and until then they waited.
What were the Urim and Thummim?
They were the means God gave the high priest for asking his will. ʼÛwrîym means “lights” and Tummîym means “perfections”. God told Moses to put them in “the breastplate of judgment”, so that they would be “upon Aaron’s heart, when he goeth in before the LORD” (Exodus 28:30). Through them the high priest brought to God the questions his people were unable to settle themselves. When Joshua was appointed, Eleazar the priest was to ask counsel for him “after the judgment of Urim before the LORD” (Numbers 27:21), and Moses blessed Levi with the words, “Let thy Thummim and thy Urim be with thy holy one” (Deuteronomy 33:8). Scripture leaves the way they gave an answer undescribed, and they may have given a simple yes or no to a question put to God.
Why had the Urim and Thummim fallen out of use?
Their use belongs to Israel’s earlier history, and by the return from exile it had ceased for reasons Scripture leaves untold. Asking God through the priest’s ephod is recorded in David’s day, when David asked the LORD whether Saul would come down to Keilah (1 Samuel 23:9–12). The Urim and Thummim may have been lost when the Babylonians destroyed the first temple in 586 BC. God may have spoken more and more through his prophets in their place, or Israel’s unfaithfulness before the exile may have brought their use to an end. Whatever the cause, the governor refused to settle by guesswork what belonged to God to settle: “The secret things belong unto the LORD our God: but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever” (Deuteronomy 29:29).
What became of the families whose line was in doubt?
They stayed among God’s people, counted in the register, and the priests among them lost the right to serve and to eat the holy food. The verses leave the end of their story untold. The ruling expelled none of them from the community, and their names stand in the record of the return. The lay families of verse 59 most likely lived among the people without the full standing of a proven family, such as a claim to ancestral land. Their place was settled for the time being and left open for God to confirm.
How does Christ meet the need these verses leave open?
Christ is the priest whose right to serve rests on the power of an endless life, and in him every believer is made a priest unto God. Jesus’ own descent is written down, “The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham” (Matthew 1:1), and Luke traces it as well (Luke 3). His priesthood stands after the order of Melchizedek, and he is made priest “after the power of an endless life” (Hebrews 7:11–17).
Hebrews says of Melchizedek that he was “Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually” (Hebrews 7:3). The men of Ezra 2:62 needed a written descent to serve. Melchizedek, a priest of unrecorded descent, is the likeness of the Son, who abides a priest for ever.
These priests were counted “as polluted”. The high priest we have is “holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners” (Hebrews 7:26), and his blood purges our conscience to serve the living God (Hebrews 9:14). He “washed us from our sins in his own blood” and has “made us kings and priests unto God” (Revelation 1:5–6). Peter calls believers “a royal priesthood” (1 Peter 2:9) and “lively stones” built up into “a spiritual house” to offer spiritual sacrifices (1 Peter 2:5).
These men were kept from the most holy things. In Christ, our “great high priest” (Hebrews 4:14), believers have “boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus”, by “a new and living way” (Hebrews 10:19–20), and so we hear, “Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace” (Hebrews 4:16).
The ruling waited for a priest who could bring God’s answer. God “hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son” (Hebrews 1:1–3), the Word made flesh (John 1:14), and the Spirit of truth guides his people “into all truth” (John 16:13). Jeremiah promised a new covenant in which all God’s people would know him (Jeremiah 31:31–34).
Who are “of Israel” now?
All who believe in Christ are counted as the seed. The question of verse 59 was “whether they were of Israel”, and Paul writes, “For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel”, and “the children of the promise are counted for the seed” (Romans 9:6–8). To all who received Christ “gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name” (John 1:12). Believers from every nation are “fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God” (Ephesians 2:19), all “one in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:28). Anyone in Christ “is a new creature” (2 Corinthians 5:17), made free indeed by the Son (John 8:36), and built into the church that he himself builds (Matthew 16:18).
Known to God by Name
These verses show a people who chose to wait on God over guessing about the things of God. They honoured his holiness at real cost to some of their own, and they trusted him to give an answer in his time. A lost record kept a family from the priesthood, while the register God keeps of his own is complete. In Ezra’s day the families of Delaiah, Tobiah and Nekoda came home under names that confess the LORD’s deliverance and goodness, and they were counted with their question still open. Through Christ that question is answered for everyone who believes. Your place among God’s people rests on the priest who abides for ever, and through him the Father’s house is open to you.
Ezra 2:59
“And these were they which went up from Telmelah, Telharsa, Cherub, Addan, and Immer:”
The places in Babylonia these families left. They took part in the return like everyone else in the list.
“but they could not shew their father’s house, and their seed,”
They were unable to declare (nâgad) the clan they belonged to or the line of descent (zeraʻ) that joined them to it.
“whether they were of Israel:”
The doubt touched their membership in God’s people, the most basic question the register answered.
Ezra 2:60
“The children of Delaiah, the children of Tobiah, the children of Nekoda,”
These are the families of verse 59, named by their ancestors. Delaiah means “the LORD has delivered” and Tobiah “goodness of the LORD”.
“six hundred fifty and two.”
They were counted in the register although their descent was unproved. Nehemiah’s list gives 642.
Ezra 2:61 This verse
“And of the children of the priests:”
A second group, of priestly families, with the same difficulty.
“the children of Habaiah, the children of Koz, the children of Barzillai;”
Three priestly families whose names were missing from the records.
“which took a wife of the daughters of Barzillai the Gileadite,”
An ancestor married into the family of David’s loyal friend from Gilead, a house outside the priesthood.
“and was called after their name:”
He took his wife’s family name, and with it the family’s priestly descent passed out of sight.
Ezra 2:62
“These sought their register among those that were reckoned by genealogy,”
They searched the written lists of priestly descent for their own entry.
“but they were not found:”
The written record was all they had to go on, and their names were missing from it.
“therefore were they, as polluted, put from the priesthood.”
They were treated as ritually unfit for the priest’s office and removed from its work until God should answer.
Ezra 2:63
“And the Tirshatha said unto them,”
The governor appointed under the Persian king gave the ruling.
“that they should not eat of the most holy things,”
They lost the priests’ share of the holiest offerings, the plainest privilege of a priest at the temple.
“till there stood up a priest with Urim and with Thummim.”
The ban waited on an answer from God, given through the means he had appointed for the high priest.
Last revised