Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the names of them were Aholah the elder, and Aholibah her sister: and they were mine, and they bare sons and daughters. Thus were their names; Samaria is Aholah, and Jerusalem Aholibah.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the names H8034 of them were Aholah H170 the elder H1419, and Aholibah H172 her sister H269: and they were mine, and they bare H3205 sons H1121 and daughters H1323. Thus were their names H8034; Samaria H8111 is Aholah H170, and Jerusalem H3389 Aholibah H172.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Their names were Oholah, the older one, and Oholivah, her sister. They belonged to me, and they gave birth to sons and daughters. As for their names, Shomron is Oholah, and Yerushalayim is Oholivah
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The older was named Oholah, and her sister was named Oholibah. They became Mine and gave birth to sons and daughters. As for their identities, Oholah is Samaria, and Oholibah is Jerusalem.
Ask
American Standard Version
And the names of them were Oholah the elder, and Oholibah her sister: and they became mine, and they bare sons and daughters. And as for their names, Samaria is Oholah, and Jerusalem Oholibah.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Their names were Oholah the elder, and Oholibah her sister: and they became mine, and they bore sons and daughters. As for their names, Samaria is Oholah, and Jerusalem Oholibah.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And the names of them were Aholah the elder, and Aholibah her sister: and they were mine, and they bare sonnes and daughters: thus were their names. Samaria is Aholah, and Ierusalem Aholibah.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And their names are Aholah the elder, And Aholibah her sister, And they are Mine, and bear sons and daughters. As to their names--Samaria is Aholah, And Jerusalem is Aholibah.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Ezekiel 23:4 introduces the two allegorical sisters, Aholah and Aholibah, serving as vivid personifications of the Northern Kingdom of Israel (Samaria) and the Southern Kingdom of Judah (Jerusalem), respectively. This verse masterfully sets the stage for a profound and disturbing prophetic indictment, revealing God's intimate covenant relationship with both nations, their subsequent spiritual harlotry through idolatry and foreign alliances, and the tragic legacy of their unfaithfulness, symbolized by the "sons and daughters" they bore.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Ezekiel 23 is a powerful and graphic allegory that continues the prophet's consistent theme of Israel's spiritual adultery. It immediately follows Ezekiel 22, which details a catalog of Judah's sins, and it builds upon the earlier, equally striking allegory of Jerusalem as an abandoned infant raised by God, only to become a harlot in Ezekiel 16. This chapter, therefore, extends the indictment to both halves of the divided kingdom, portraying their shared history of rebellion against their divine Husband. The narrative flow is one of escalating unfaithfulness, leading to inevitable divine judgment, a recurring motif throughout Ezekiel's prophetic messages. The explicit naming of Samaria and Jerusalem in Ezekiel 23:4 clarifies the allegorical identities, ensuring the audience understands the specific targets of God's wrath.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The prophet Ezekiel ministered during the Babylonian exile (c. 593-571 BC), a period marked by the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple, and the deportation of Judah's elite. Samaria, the capital of the Northern Kingdom, had already fallen to Assyria in 722 BC, and its inhabitants had been dispersed and intermingled with foreign peoples. Judah, despite witnessing Israel's demise, continued its own pattern of spiritual apostasy, forming alliances with Egypt and Babylon rather than trusting in Yahweh. The imagery of "harlotry" was a common biblical metaphor for covenant unfaithfulness, particularly idolatry, reflecting the ancient Near Eastern concept of marriage as a binding covenant. The practice of nations seeking alliances with powerful empires was common, but for Israel, such alliances often involved adopting foreign gods and customs, directly violating their covenant with Yahweh, who demanded exclusive devotion.
  • Key Themes: This verse, and the broader chapter, powerfully underscores several major theological and narrative themes prevalent in Ezekiel and the Old Testament. Firstly, it highlights Divine Ownership and Covenant Fidelity, emphasizing that both Israel and Judah were uniquely "mine" to Yahweh, chosen and bound to Him by a sacred covenant, akin to a marriage. Their unfaithfulness, therefore, was a profound betrayal of this intimate relationship, as seen in passages like Jeremiah 3:8-9. Secondly, the passage vividly portrays Spiritual Adultery and Idolatry as the primary sin, using the metaphor of harlotry to describe their pursuit of foreign gods and reliance on human alliances, a theme echoed throughout prophetic literature (e.g., Hosea 4:12). Finally, the mention of "sons and daughters" underscores the theme of Progeny and Legacy, revealing that despite their fruitfulness as nations, their legacy was tragically tainted by their persistent rebellion, leading to the severe judgment described later in Ezekiel 23 and throughout Ezekiel's prophecies.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Aholah (Hebrew, ʼOhŏlâh', H170): From the root meaning "tent," this symbolic name translates to "her tent" or "she has her own tent." It is explicitly identified with Samaria, the capital of the Northern Kingdom. The name signifies Samaria's self-established worship centers, particularly the golden calves at Dan and Bethel, which were alternatives to the divinely appointed temple in Jerusalem. This "own tent" represents a departure from God's prescribed worship, a reliance on human-made religion, and an independent spirit that rejected Yahweh's exclusive claim.
  • Aholibah (Hebrew, ʼOhŏlîybâh', H172): Also from the root meaning "tent," this name means "my tent is in her." It is identified with Jerusalem, the capital of the Southern Kingdom of Judah, where God's Temple—His dwelling place—was located. The name highlights the profound irony and heightened culpability of Judah's spiritual harlotry. Their sin was committed in the very presence of God's sanctuary, making their unfaithfulness even more egregious and inexcusable, as they defiled the place where God had chosen to dwell among His people.
  • elder (Hebrew, gâdôwl', H1419): This word primarily means "great" but can also denote "older" or "elder." In this context, it signifies Aholah (Samaria/Israel) as the elder sister, reflecting the historical reality that the Northern Kingdom separated from Judah earlier and had a longer history of established idolatry and defection from the Davidic covenant. This chronological precedence reinforces the idea that Judah (Aholibah) should have learned from Israel's mistakes but instead followed a similar, if not worse, path.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the names of them [were] Aholah the elder, and Aholibah her sister:" This opening clause immediately introduces the two central figures of the allegory, establishing their familial relationship as sisters. By designating Aholah as "the elder," the text subtly hints at the historical sequence of their unfaithfulness, with the Northern Kingdom (Aholah) having a longer and more entrenched history of apostasy before the Southern Kingdom (Aholibah) fully succumbed.
  • "and they were mine," This crucial phrase underscores God's prior and intimate covenant relationship with both nations. It asserts His sovereign ownership and the deep commitment He had made to them as His chosen people. This declaration highlights the profound betrayal inherent in their subsequent actions, as they were not merely unfaithful strangers but covenant partners who had forsaken their divine Husband.
  • "and they bare sons and daughters." This clause signifies the nations' fruitfulness and the continuation of their lineage. It implies that despite their spiritual unfaithfulness, God still allowed them to prosper numerically and to have a legacy. However, within the context of the broader allegory, these "sons and daughters" would tragically become participants in, or victims of, the very harlotry of their "mothers," perpetuating the cycle of sin and judgment.
  • "Thus [were] their names; Samaria [is] Aholah, and Jerusalem Aholibah." This final clause provides the explicit identification of the allegorical figures, removing any ambiguity. It directly links Aholah to Samaria, the capital of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, and Aholibah to Jerusalem, the capital of the Southern Kingdom of Judah. This direct correlation ensures the audience understands the specific targets of the prophecy and the gravity of the charges being leveled against both historical entities.

Literary Devices

Ezekiel 23:4 is rich in literary devices that enhance its prophetic impact. The overarching device is Allegory, where the entire narrative of two sisters engaging in harlotry represents the spiritual unfaithfulness of Israel and Judah. This extended metaphor allows for a vivid and emotionally charged portrayal of abstract theological concepts. Personification is central, as Samaria and Jerusalem, geographical and political entities, are given human attributes and actions, specifically being depicted as "sisters" who "bare sons and daughters." This humanization makes their spiritual adultery more relatable and scandalous. Furthermore, the very names, Aholah and Aholibah, are potent Symbolism. As explored in the key word analysis, "Aholah" (her own tent) symbolizes Samaria's self-willed idolatry and rejection of God's prescribed worship, while "Aholibah" (my tent is in her) symbolizes Jerusalem's even greater culpability due to the presence of God's Temple within her. The entire chapter employs Metaphor, with "harlotry" serving as the primary metaphor for idolatry and covenant breaking, a common prophetic trope that powerfully conveys the depth of Israel's betrayal of their covenant with Yahweh.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Ezekiel 23:4 establishes the foundation for understanding God's profound grief and righteous indignation over the unfaithfulness of His covenant people. The verse highlights God's initial ownership and intimate relationship with both Israel and Judah, emphasizing that their subsequent spiritual harlotry was not merely a transgression but a deeply personal betrayal of a divine marriage covenant. It underscores the severity of idolatry, portraying it not just as a religious error but as an act of spiritual adultery that defiles the relationship with the one true God. The distinct names, Aholah and Aholibah, further reveal God's nuanced understanding of their respective sins: Samaria's self-made religion versus Jerusalem's egregious sin in the very presence of God's dwelling. This passage serves as a stark reminder that God takes His covenant seriously and that unfaithfulness, even from those intimately known by Him, will incur righteous judgment.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Ezekiel 23:4, though rooted in the historical context of ancient Israel and Judah, carries profound spiritual implications for believers today. The allegory of the two sisters serves as a sober warning against spiritual complacency and the insidious nature of idolatry. Just as Aholah and Aholibah, despite being "mine" to God, turned to other lovers, we too can subtly shift our devotion from God to other things—be it comfort, security, success, relationships, or even our own self-sufficiency. The "sons and daughters" they bore remind us that our spiritual choices have far-reaching consequences, impacting not only our own lives but also the legacy we pass on to future generations. This verse calls us to a radical self-examination, prompting us to identify any "tents" we have built for ourselves outside of God's will or any areas where we have allowed other allegiances to usurp His rightful place in our hearts. It is a call to unwavering, exclusive devotion to the One who has claimed us as His own.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways might I be building "my own tent" (Aholah) in my life, relying on self-made solutions or alternative sources of comfort and security instead of God?
  • Considering that God's "tent is in me" (Aholibah) through the indwelling Holy Spirit, how might my actions or attitudes be grieving or dishonoring His presence within me?
  • What "sons and daughters" (legacy, influence, habits) am I producing through my life, and are they a testament to faithfulness or unfaithfulness to God?
  • How can I actively guard my heart against modern forms of spiritual harlotry and maintain exclusive devotion to Christ?

FAQ

Why are Samaria and Jerusalem depicted as sisters in this allegory?

Answer: The depiction of Samaria (Northern Kingdom) and Jerusalem (Southern Kingdom) as sisters, Aholah and Aholibah, emphasizes their shared origin and common heritage as descendants of Abraham, united under God's covenant. Despite their political division after Solomon's reign, they were still fundamentally one people in God's eyes. This familial relationship makes their mutual and escalating unfaithfulness to Yahweh even more tragic and scandalous, highlighting a pattern of rebellion that spread across both halves of the nation, as seen in the historical accounts in 1 Kings 12 and 2 Kings 17.

What is the deeper meaning behind the names Aholah and Aholibah?

Answer: The names are highly symbolic and central to the allegory. Aholah means "her tent," signifying Samaria's self-established places of worship (like the golden calves at Dan and Bethel) that deviated from God's prescribed worship at the Jerusalem Temple. It represents a self-willed religion. Aholibah means "my tent is in her," referring to Jerusalem, where God's own Temple (His dwelling place) was located. This name highlights Judah's greater culpability, as they sinned in the very presence of God, defiling His sanctuary and covenant despite His intimate presence among them. This distinction underscores the severity of Judah's betrayal.

What does "they bare sons and daughters" signify in this allegorical context?

Answer: In this allegory, "they bare sons and daughters" signifies that both the Northern Kingdom of Israel and the Southern Kingdom of Judah were fruitful and populous nations. It speaks to their demographic growth and the continuation of their national existence and legacy. However, within the context of the chapter's theme of spiritual harlotry, it also implies that these "sons and daughters"—the subsequent generations—were often raised in, and became participants in, the same idolatrous and unfaithful practices of their "mothers." This perpetuates the cycle of sin and brings the consequences of the nations' unfaithfulness upon their descendants, leading to the judgments described in Ezekiel and other prophetic books.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Ezekiel 23:4, with its portrayal of Israel and Judah as unfaithful sisters, powerfully sets the stage for the New Covenant in Christ. The "harlotry" of Aholah and Aholibah underscores humanity's persistent inability to remain faithful to God under the Old Covenant, demonstrating the desperate need for a new heart and a new spirit (as promised in Ezekiel 36:26-27). Jesus Christ emerges as the faithful Bridegroom, the one who perfectly fulfills the covenant that Israel continually broke. Unlike the unfaithful sisters who sought other lovers, Christ remained perfectly obedient to the Father, even to the point of death on the cross (Philippians 2:8). Furthermore, the symbolic names "Aholah" (her own tent) and "Aholibah" (my tent is in her) find their ultimate fulfillment in Christ. God's true "tent" or dwelling place is no longer a physical temple in Jerusalem, but the person of Jesus Christ, in whom "the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily" (Colossians 2:9). Through Christ, believers become the new temple, the dwelling place of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 6:19), fulfilling the promise that God's tent would truly be "in her" (His people). The "sons and daughters" now refer to the spiritual children born into God's family through faith in Christ, a new lineage not based on physical descent but on spiritual rebirth (John 1:12-13). Thus, the judgment on unfaithful Israel highlights the necessity of Christ's perfect faithfulness and the new covenant He inaugurated, offering true reconciliation and a spiritual union that can never be broken.

Copy as

Commentary on Ezekiel 23 verses 1–10

God had often spoken to Ezekiel, and by him to the people, to this effect, but now his word comes again; for God speaks the same thing once, yea, twice, yea, many a time, and all little enough, and too little, for man perceives it not. Note, To convince sinners of the evil of sin, and of their misery and danger by reason of it, there is need of line upon line, so loth we are to know the worst of ourselves. The sinners that are here to be exposed are two women, two kingdoms, sister-kingdoms, Israel and Judah, daughters of one mother, having been for a long time but one people. Solomon's kingdom was so large, so populous, that immediately after his death it divided into two. Observe, 1. Their character when they were one (Eze 23:3): They committed whoredoms in Egypt, for there they were guilty of idolatry, as we read before, Eze 20:8. The representing of those sins which are most provoking to God and most ruining to a people by the sin of whoredom plainly intimates what an exceedingly sinful sin uncleanness is, how offensive, how destructive. Doubtless it is itself one of the worst of sins, for the worst of other sins are compared to it here and often elsewhere, which should increase our detestation and dread of all manner of fleshly lusts, all appearances of them and approaches to them, as warring against the soul, infatuating sinners, bewitching them, alienating their minds from God and all that is good, debauching conscience, rendering them odious in the eyes of the pure and holy God, and drowning them at last in destruction and perdition. 2. Their names when they became two, Eze 23:4. The kingdom of Israel is called the elder sister, because that first made the breach, and separated from the family both of kings and priests that God had appointed - the greater sister (so the word is), for ten tribes belonged to that kingdom and only two to the other. God says of them both, They were mine, for they were the seed of Abraham his friend and of Jacob his chosen; they were in covenant with God, and carried about with them the sign of their circumcision, the seal of the covenant. They were mine; and therefore their apostasy was the highest injustice. It was alienating God's property, it was the basest ingratitude to the best of benefactors, and a perfidious treacherous violation of the most sacred engagements. Note, Those who have been in profession the people of God, but have revolted from him, have a great deal to answer for more than those who never made any such profession. "They were mine; they were espoused tome, and to me they bore sons and daughters;" there were many among them that were devoted to God's honour, and employed in his service, and were the strength and beauty of these kingdoms, as children are of the families they are born in. In this parable Samaria and the kingdom of Israel shall bear the name of Aholah - her own tabernacle, because the places of worship which that kingdom had were of their own devising, their own choosing, and the worship itself was their own invention; God never owned it. Her tabernacle to herself (so some render it); "let her take it to herself, and make her best of it." Jerusalem and the kingdom of Judah bear the name of Aholibah - my tabernacle is in her, because their temple was the place which God himself had chosen to put his name there. He acknowledged it to be his, and honoured them with the tokens of his presence in it. Note, Of those that stand in relation to God, and make profession of his name, some have greater privileges and advantages than others; and, as those who have greater are thereby rendered the more inexcusable if they revolt from God, so those who have less will not thereby be rendered inexcusable. 3. The treacherous departure of the kingdom of Israel from God (Eze 23:5): Aholah played the harlot when she was mine. Though the ten tribes had deserted the house of David, yet God owned them for his still; though Jeroboam, in setting up the golden calves, sinned, and made Israel to sin, yet, as long as they worshipped the God of Israel only, though by images, he did not quite cast them off. But they way of sin is down-hill. Aholah played the harlot, brought in the worship of Baal (Kg1 16:31), set up that other god, that dunghill-god, in competition with Jehovah (Kg1 18:21), as a vile adulteress dotes on her lovers, because they are well dressed and make a figure, because they are young and handsome (Eze 23:6), clothed with blue, captains and rulers, desirable young men, genteel, and that pass for men of honour, so she doted upon her neighbours, particularly the Assyrians, who had extended their conquests near them; she admired their idols and worshipped them, admired the pomp of their courts and their military strength and courted alliances with them upon any terms, as if her own God were not sufficient to be depended upon. We find one of the kings of Israel giving a thousand talents to the king of Assyria, to engage him in his interests, Kg2 15:19. She doted on the chosen men of Assyria, as worthy to be trusted and employed in the service of the state (Eze 23:7), and on all their idols with which she defiled herself. Note, Whatever creature we dote upon, pay homage to, and put a confidence in, we make an idol of that creature; and whatever we make an idol of we defile ourselves with. And now again the conviction looks back as far as the original of their nation: Neither left she her whoredoms which she brought from Egypt, Eze 23:8. Their being idolaters in Egypt was a thing never to be forgotten - that they should be in love with Egypt's idols even when they were continually in fear of Egypt's tyrants and task-masters! But (as some have observed) therefore, at that time, when Satan boasted of his having walked through the earth as all his own, to disprove his pretensions God did not say, Hast thou considered my people Israel in Egypt? (for they had become idolaters, and were not to be boasted of), but, Hast thou considered my servant Job in the land of Uz? And this corrupt disposition in them, when they were first formed into a people, is an emblem of that original corruption which is born with us and is woven into our constitution, a strong bias towards the world and the flesh, like that in the Israelites towards idolatry; it was bred in the bone with them, and was charged upon them long after, that they left not their whoredoms brought from Egypt. It would never out of the flesh, though Egypt had been a house of bondage to them. Thus the corrupt affections and inclinations which we brought into the world with us we have not lost, nor got clear of, but still retain them, though the iniquity we were born in was the source of all the calamities which human life is liable to. 4. The destruction of the kingdom of Israel for their apostasy from God (Eze 23:9, Eze 23:10): I have delivered her into the hand of her lovers. God first justly gave her up to her lust (Ephraim is joined to idols, let him alone), and then gave her up to her lovers. The neighbouring nations, whose idolatries she had conformed to and whose friendship she had confided in, and in both had affronted God, are now made use of as the instruments of her destruction. The Assyrians, on whom she doted, soon spied out the nakedness of the land, discovered her blind side, on which to attack her, stripped her of all her ornaments and all her defences, and so uncovered her, and made her naked and bare, carried her sons and daughters into captivity, slew her with the sword, and quite destroyed that kingdom and put an end to it. We have the story at large Kg2 17:6, etc., where the cause of the ruin of that once flourishing kingdom by the Assyrians is shown to be their forsaking the God of Israel, fearing other gods, and walking in the statutes of the heathen; it was for this that God was very angry with them and removed them out of his sight, Eze 23:18. And that the Assyrians, whom they had been so fond of, should be employed in executing judgments upon them was very remarkable, and shows how God, in a way of righteous judgment, often makes that a scourge to sinners which they have inordinately set their hearts upon. The devil will for ever be a tormentor to those impenitent sinners who now hearken to him and comply with him as a tempter. Thus Samaria became famous among women, or infamous rather; she became a name (so the word is); not only she came to be the subject of discourse, and much talked of, as the desolations of cities and kingdoms fill the newspapers, but she was thus ruined for her idolatries in terrorem - for warning to all people to take heed of doing likewise; as the public execution of notorious malefactors makes them such a name, such an ill name, as may serve to frighten others from those wicked courses which have brought them to a miserable and shameful end. Deu 21:21, All Israel shall hear and fear.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–10. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Ezekiel
(Chapter 23, verses 1 onwards) And the word of the Lord came to me, saying: Son of man, there were two women, the daughters of one mother. And they played the harlot in Egypt, in their youth they played the harlot. There their breasts were pressed and their virgin bosoms were broken (or, as it is in the Septuagint, There their breasts fell and there they were deflowered). Their names were Oholah the elder (or, the elder sister), and Oholibah her sister. And I took them (whether they were given to me) and they bore sons and daughters. And their names were Samaria Oolla and Jerusalem Ooliba. Therefore, Oolla prostituted herself with me and she went mad (or went away) to her lovers in Assyria, who approached her, dressed in purple, rulers and officials, all young men, choice horsemen. And she gave her fornications over them, all the elect sons of Assyria, and in all on whom she had been mad upon with her uncleanness (or inventions), she was defiled. Moreover, she did not leave her fornications which she had in Egypt. For they also had slept with her in her youth, and they broke the breasts of her puberty (or they also deflowered her): and they poured their fornication over her. Therefore, I handed her over to the hands of her lovers, to the hands of the sons of Assyria, on whose lust she had gone mad. They uncovered her shame; they took away her sons and daughters, and killed her with the sword. And she became a byword among women; judgments were executed upon her. The Scripture testifies that the twelve tribes of Israel, which were united in Egypt, later divided into two and ten tribes, called Judah and Israel, as recorded in the books of Kings and Chronicles. The tribe of Judah ruled from the line of David, with Rehoboam as the son of Solomon in Jerusalem, where there was a temple and priests, and a large part of the tribe of Levi. But in Samaria, Jeroboam the son of Nabat from the tribe of Ephraim and Joseph ruled over the ten tribes; of which Samaria is now called Oolla, which in our language means tabernacle: but Jerusalem is called Ooliba, which means my tabernacle in it. For indeed, even among the ten tribes, there was a tabernacle not of God, but of idols. For Jeroboam had set up golden calves in Dan and Bethel in order to turn the people away from the worship of God. Let us therefore speak about each. These two women, Samaria and Jerusalem, were daughters of the same mother from the lineage of Israel, and they committed adultery in Egypt during their youth. For they would not have received the Law when they were brought out of Egypt and gathered at Mount Sinai, which prohibited them from worshiping idols, unless they had worshiped Egyptian idols while in Egypt. However, the mother of both could be Chethaea, of whom we read above: Your father was Amorrhaeus, and your mother was Chethaea (Above, XVI, 3). But when it is said: Let each one remove the abominations of Egypt from his sight, it signifies that in Egypt the Israelites worshipped idols and fell there, whether their breasts of virginity were broken or not. And Samaria is said to be greater and older, either because of the multitude of the ten tribes, or because after the death of Moses from the tribe of Ephraim, Joshua the son of Nun led the people: hence we read that Jeroboam, who split them, was from the house of David (3 Kings, XII). And God had them, whether they were made by him, when they groaned from the works of Egypt, serving clay and brick. And afterwards they bore sons and daughters, either in the wilderness or in the promised land. And first Oolla, that is, Samaria, fornicated against God, when she went mad for the Assyrians, who were dressed in her hyacinth garments, not just any people, but leaders and magistrates, not those worn out by age, but all young men, chosen horsemen, from whom she followed idols and from whom she demanded help against the command of God. Those who came and defiled her, did not leave anything that she had done in her youth in Egypt. For even the Egyptians had sexual relations with her in her youth, of whom she worshiped their idols; and there, her virginity was taken and her breasts were broken. And there was such an abundance of fornication, that it is said that they did not fornicate with her, but rather poured out their own fornication upon her. Therefore, she was delivered to her lovers, Phul, Theglathphalassar, and Salmanasar, in whose lust she went mad, and they uncovered her shame, metaphorically, like that of a harlot woman (2 Kings 17 and 18, 1 Chronicles 5). However, the revelation of the city is that it is captured, and they took captive its sons and daughters, and they slaughtered it with the sword, so that it is butchered as an example for all women, and it is celebrated in a negative way by everyone's speech. Those who carried out judgments and vengeance in it, so that they left nothing of salvation in it; but to this day, ten tribes are held captive in the mountains and cities of the Medes, to which they were transferred. We have discussed more fully the allegorical meaning of Joseph, Ephraim, Samaria, Jezreel, and Israel, and how they are contrary to the house of David and Jerusalem, which signifies the Church. The psalm, which is the seventy-seventh, speaks of this: The sons of Ephraim, being armed and carrying bows, turned back in the day of battle (Psalm 77:9). And again: He rejected the tabernacle of Joseph and chose the tribe of Judah (Ibid., 67). For God has chosen the house of confession, which is the Church, and rejected the tabernacle of Joseph, which signifies increase. They, neglecting the Law of God, added golden calves to their worship, and they are called Oolla, which means tabernacle, not of God, but of error and demons. And the elder and older sister, because of the multitude and captivity by the Assyrians, committed fornication against God, for she abandoned the truth of faith and went mad for the leaders of the heretics, who were clothed in hyacinth, promising her lofty and heavenly things; and the climbers, of whom it is said: These are in chariots, and on horses (Ps. XIX, 8), chosen sons of the Assyrians and leaders and magistrates, who promise themselves knowledge and eloquence. But he did this because he had the same fornications that he had in Egypt, that is, before he believed, and he still lived in the world, he also practiced them in heresy. And she was deflowered (or They were deflowered) by Assyrian men who persist in wickedness, whether as avengers. For our adversary, the devil himself, is an enemy and avenger (I Peter V). They shattered the breasts of Samaria; and they destroyed her virginity that she had in the Church. Therefore, they were delivered to their lovers, according to the Apostle who writes: I have delivered them to Satan, so that they may learn not to blaspheme (I Tim. I, 20). And: I have delivered them to the destruction of the flesh, so that the spirit may be saved (I Cor. V, 5). They uncovered the shame of miserable Samaria, and they displayed all its turpitude, leading captive the sons and daughters who were born to it, endowed with knowledge and deceived the simple and inexperienced, and killed it with a spiritual sword. They are celebrated in speech throughout the whole world in a negative light, and they become infamous among all the teachings of the world, so that the depravity of that woman may serve as an example for all.
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Ezekiel
(Verse 35, 36, and following) And I will bring you into a desert of peoples, and there I will judge you face to face. Just as I contended with your fathers in the desert of the land of Egypt, so I will judge you, says the Lord. And I will subject you to my scepter, and I will bring you into the bonds of the covenant, and I will choose from among you the transgressors and the wicked: from their place of residence I will bring them out, and they will not enter the land of Israel, and you will know that I am the Lord. Thus says the Lord: I will do for you who are in Babylon, and now serve idols, what I did for your ancestors in Egypt. I will lead you into the desert of the peoples, and there I will judge you face to face, just as I contended with them in judgment when they came out of Egypt. And after I have judged you, I will subject you to my scepter and rule, and I will make a covenant with you and bring you into your land with the bonds of love, so that bound by my love, you will never be able to depart from me. But I will choose from among you the transgressors and the wicked, who persist in the hardness of their hearts in evil deeds, not for possession, but for rejection. And I will indeed bring them out of the land of their dwelling, so that when they are brought out, they will not enter the land of Israel; but they will perish in various regions. And by the distinction between good and evil, you shall know that I am the Lord, who judges all things. The rest of the discourse hastens, and we briefly go through each point, in order to provide only the meaning to the readers.
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Ezekiel
(Ver. 23, 24 onwards) Again, I raised my hand against them in the wilderness, to scatter them among the nations and disperse them in the lands, because they had not performed my judgments, and had rejected my commandments, and had violated my Sabbaths, and their eyes had been after the idols (or thoughts) of their fathers. Therefore, I also gave them statutes that were not good, and judgments in which they would not live, and I defiled them in their offerings (or transgressions), as they offered (or led astray) everything that opens the womb because of their sins (for which the Septuagint translated, to destroy them and what they had overlooked): and they will know that I am the Lord. Where in the Old Testament, against their children, who fell in the wilderness, the Lord lifted up His hand to scatter them among the nations, Scripture does not say; but it is to be believed that this was done in accordance with what is reported here. Or he signifies by this, that after they entered the promised land, they were given over at various times, for many sins, to different nations and kings, and at that time the commandments of the Lord, which were good according to their nature, and the judgments by which believers could live, were made not good for them, since they were in no way able to keep the precepts of the law in captivity, and to do what the divine word commanded. He did not say, 'I gave them evil commandments,' but, 'not good commandments.' For it does not immediately follow that what is not good is evil, as the Apostle teaches, it is good for a man not to touch a woman; but because of incontinence, let each possess his own vessel in sanctification and honor (I Cor. VII). And if he does not do this, it is neither good nor evil. Therefore, God gave them, dispersed among the nations, not good commandments, that is, he allowed them to follow their own thoughts and desires, to do what is not appropriate. And he defiled them in his gifts: just as a Priest separates lepers from the people, and shows that they are defiled; while they offer to idols what they should offer to God. And they pass everything that opens the womb through the fire of Baal, that is, the firstborn; so that after they have deserted God and been handed over to the worship of idols, then they may understand that He is the Lord whom they have provoked to anger by their own fault. Symmachus interpreted this passage more explicitly, treating the future as past. Therefore, I will also give them bad precepts and judgments for which they will not live, and I will defile them because of their gifts, as they consecrate and offer everything that opens the womb, so that I may destroy them, and they will know that I am the Lord. And the meaning is this: because I have seen the sons of the fathers equaling the wickedness of their ancestors and doing the same things for which they offended God, I wanted to divide them into nations and disperse them throughout the whole world, and give them bad precepts and judgments in which they would not live, so that I may defile them with their gifts, for they consecrated everything that opens the womb to idols, and I may destroy them forever, and they will know that I am the Lord. Through which he showed that he had not given them good commandments who dwelt in the wilderness, but to those whom he wanted to scatter among the nations, and to make foreigners in the whole world, he gave them a desire for things that he did not give: so that there they would do good commandments of God, not good because of their own fault, while they exhibited to idols what God had commanded to be exhibited. This can also be said, that before the offense, they received only the Ten Commandments; but after idolatry and blasphemy, they received multiple ceremonies of the law, so that they would offer victims to God rather than to demons, and by comparison with sacrilege, what was not good in itself became lighter, and by no means evil, because it was offered to God, and yet not good, because they offended the author of good.
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Ezekiel
(Verse 27, 29 onwards) Therefore speak to the house of Israel, son of man, and tell them: Thus says the Lord God: Moreover, your fathers have blasphemed against me and have treated me with contempt, even as they spurned me. And I brought them into the land that I had lifted my hand to give them ((Vulgate adds: that land)): they saw every high hill and every leafy tree, and there they offered their sacrifices and presented there the irritation of their offerings, and they placed there the fragrance of their sweetness, and they poured out their ((Vulgate is silent on this)) libations there. And I said to them, 'What is the high place to which you are going?' And its name was called the High Place until this day. Therefore speak to the house of Israel, son of man, and say to them, 'Thus says the Lord God: As for your fathers, they have provoked Me to anger by their iniquities, by the fact that they have fallen away from Me. So I brought them into the land that I had lifted My hand in an oath to give them.' They saw every high hill and every leafy tree, and there they offered their sacrifices. They also presented there the provocation of their gifts, and they set there their pleasing aroma, and they poured out there their drink offerings. And I said to them: What is abbana, because you enter there? And they called its name abbana until this day. I wanted, he said, to scatter them in the wilderness, and to give them not good precepts, so that they would sacrifice to idols what they should have offered to me, and consecrate all their first-fruits to them by fire, so that I might kill them and destroy them. But when he says, I wanted, he shows that he did not do what he wanted. And that which follows: 'And they shall know that I am the Lord,' is not found in the Septuagint. For it did not seem fitting to them to know after their destruction that he himself is the Lord. But you, son of man, speak again to them, that is, to the elders of the house of Israel, who have come to inquire of you: Your fathers, from whom you have descended, have also blasphemed against me and held me in contempt; after I brought them into the land which I had given them to possess, they turned against me to provoke me. For when they saw every high hill and leafy tree, they would sacrifice on the mountains and in the groves and thickets, and offer victims to the idols, and pour out libations. And when I saw this, I said to them: What is this, Bama? for it is called high: or why do you enter into such a place which you have chosen for yourselves in all the hills, so that even today these places are called Bamoth, and the ancient error retains its original name? Regarding Bama, which we translate as excelsum, there is an error in the Septuagint edition, where it is written as ἀββανὰ, which does not resonate in the Hebrew language. Bama can mean 'in which' if the two syllables are divided into two words, but in the present context, that sense does not fit. However, wherever it is written in the Books of Kings and Chronicles: 'The people still sacrificed and offered incense on the high places,' Bama in the singular and Bamoth in the plural mean 'high places.'
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Ezekiel 23:4 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.