Skip to content

Ezekiel 16:50

“Worse Than Samaria and Sodom”· Ezekiel 16:44–59Read in context
King James Version
And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away as I saw good.
KJV (with Strong's)
And they were haughty H1361, and committed H6213 abomination H8441 before H6440 me: therefore I took them away H5493 as I saw H7200 good.
Complete Jewish Bible
They were arrogant and committed disgusting acts before me; so that when I saw it, I swept them away.
Berean Standard Bible
Thus they were haughty and committed abominations before Me. Therefore I removed them, as you have seen.
American Standard Version
And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away as I saw good.
World English Bible Messianic
They were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away when I saw it.
Geneva Bible (1599)
But they were hautie, and committed abomination before mee: therefore I tooke them away, as pleased me.
Young's Literal Translation
And they are haughty and do abomination before Me, And I turn them aside when I have seen.
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 20,813 of 31,102 · 66.9%

Study this verse

Summary

Ezekiel 16:50 delivers a concise yet profound indictment against Jerusalem, representing Judah, articulating the core reasons for God's severe judgment upon her: rampant spiritual arrogance and the widespread practice of detestable acts. This verse encapsulates the culmination of Israel's covenant unfaithfulness, highlighting that their pride and abominations were not merely incidental sins but foundational transgressions that necessitated divine intervention, resulting in their removal from the land as a righteous and sovereign act of God.

Context

Literary Context

Ezekiel 16 is an extended, vivid allegory portraying Jerusalem as an unfaithful bride, chosen by God from a destitute state and lavished with blessings, only to betray Him through spiritual prostitution. The chapter begins with Jerusalem's humble, even repulsive, origins, as described in Ezekiel 16:1-7, followed by God's covenant love and adornment in Ezekiel 16:8-14. The narrative then shifts dramatically to her egregious unfaithfulness, detailing her idolatry and alliances with pagan nations throughout Ezekiel 16:15-34. Verses 35-43 outline the severe judgment God will bring upon her. Ezekiel 16:44-59 specifically compares Jerusalem's sins to those of her "sisters," Samaria (the northern kingdom) and Sodom, shockingly concluding that Jerusalem's wickedness surpassed even theirs, making her "more abominable" than the infamous Sodom, as stated in Ezekiel 16:47. Verse 50, therefore, serves as a concise summary of the moral and spiritual state that led to this unprecedented condemnation, immediately preceding promises of future restoration in Ezekiel 16:60-63, which underscore God's ultimate faithfulness despite Israel's rebellion.

Historical & Cultural Context

The prophet Ezekiel ministered during the Babylonian exile, speaking to a people who had been deported from Judah. Jerusalem, the capital, was under siege and would eventually fall, leading to the destruction of the Temple. The sins described in Ezekiel 16, particularly idolatry and child sacrifice (e.g., Ezekiel 16:20-21), were prevalent in Judah during the late monarchical period, influenced by the surrounding Canaanite and Mesopotamian cultures. The "haughtiness" mentioned in the verse speaks to a deep-seated spiritual pride and self-sufficiency that led Judah to trust in political alliances and pagan gods rather than the Lord, despite repeated warnings from prophets like Jeremiah and Isaiah. The comparison to Sodom (see Genesis 19) would have been particularly shocking and humiliating to the exiles, as Sodom was the epitome of depravity, yet Jerusalem's covenant breaking was deemed worse. The "taking away" refers directly to the Babylonian deportations, a historical reality for Ezekiel's audience, serving as God's judgment for their persistent rebellion.

Key Themes

This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within Ezekiel and the broader prophetic literature. The theme of Divine Judgment is central, demonstrating God's righteous response to covenant infidelity and persistent sin. It underscores that God, though merciful, is also just and will not tolerate rebellion indefinitely, especially from His chosen people who bear His name. The theme of Covenant Unfaithfulness is paramount, as Jerusalem's actions are depicted as a betrayal of her sacred marriage covenant with Yahweh, highlighting the severe consequences of spiritual adultery. Furthermore, the verse emphasizes the destructive nature of Pride and Arrogance, revealing how a haughty spirit leads to a disregard for God's commands and ultimately to detestable practices. The concept of Abomination (Hebrew: to'evah) is a recurring motif, signifying acts that are utterly repugnant to God's holy character, encompassing idolatry, moral corruption, and social injustice, which were rampant in Jerusalem and led to their downfall. This verse also subtly hints at Divine Sovereignty, as God's act of "taking them away as I saw good" affirms His ultimate control and purpose even in judgment, as seen in Lamentations 3:37-38.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Haughty gâbahh' H1361

A primitive root meaning "to soar" or "to be lofty," figuratively extended to "be haughty" or "proud." In Ezekiel 16:50, this describes Jerusalem's spiritual arrogance, a self-exaltation that led to a disregard for God's covenant and laws. This pride manifested as self-sufficiency, a refusal to acknowledge their dependence on God, and an inflated sense of their own importance, which ultimately fueled their rebellion and led them to commit detestable acts in His sight.

Committed ʻâsâh' H6213

A primitive root signifying "to do or make" in its broadest sense, encompassing a wide range of actions, from accomplishment to appointment, and to "commit" as used here. In this context, it emphasizes the active and deliberate nature of Jerusalem's sin. They didn't merely fall into abomination; they committed it, indicating a conscious and willful engagement in practices abhorrent to God, demonstrating a profound spiritual agency in their rebellion.

Abomination tôwʻêbah' H8441

Derived from a verb meaning "to abhor," this feminine noun refers to "something disgusting (morally)," an "abhorrence," or specifically "idolatry" or an "idol." In Ezekiel 16:50, to'evah encompasses the full spectrum of Jerusalem's detestable acts, including idolatrous worship, child sacrifice, sexual perversions, and social injustices that violated God's holiness and covenant stipulations. It signifies acts that are utterly repugnant to God's character and provoke His righteous wrath.

Took them away çûwr' H5493

A primitive root meaning "to turn off," "depart," or "remove." Here, it refers to God's decisive act of removing Jerusalem's inhabitants from their land through exile. The phrasing "I took them away" underscores God's direct agency and sovereignty in executing judgment, indicating that the exile was not a random misfortune but a deliberate, purposeful act of divine discipline in response to their persistent sin.

Saw râʼâh' H7200

A primitive root meaning "to see," literally or figuratively, often implying discernment, approval, or a purposeful decision. In the phrase "as I saw good," it emphasizes God's perfect wisdom, justice, and sovereign discretion in His judgment. It affirms that His actions were not arbitrary or impulsive but were carefully considered, righteous, and aligned with His divine character and purposes, even when severe.

Verse Breakdown

"And they were haughty"

This clause highlights Jerusalem's spiritual pride and arrogance. Their elevated self-perception led them to disregard God's commands and to believe they were self-sufficient, capable of forging their own path and making alliances without divine counsel. This haughtiness was a foundational sin, preceding and enabling their other transgressions.

"and committed abomination before me"

This phrase describes the active and deliberate engagement in practices that were utterly detestable to God. These "abominations" included widespread idolatry, the horrific practice of child sacrifice, and various forms of moral corruption that permeated Jerusalem's society. The phrase "before me" emphasizes that these acts were committed in God's direct sight, a brazen defiance of His holiness and covenant.

"therefore I took them away"

This clause signifies God's direct and decisive act of judgment. The "therefore" establishes a clear cause-and-effect relationship: their haughtiness and abominations directly led to God's intervention. "Took them away" refers specifically to the Babylonian exile, where the people of Judah were forcibly removed from their land, losing their temple, their city, and their national autonomy.

"as I saw [good]."

This concluding phrase underscores God's sovereignty, wisdom, and righteousness in executing judgment. It communicates that God's decision to bring about the exile was not arbitrary but was a deliberate, purposeful, and just act, fully aligned with His divine character and perfect will. It implies a reasoned and righteous judgment, not an impulsive reaction.

Literary Devices

Ezekiel 16:50, while concise, employs several powerful literary devices. The entire chapter is an extended Allegory, where Jerusalem is personified as an unfaithful wife, and this verse functions as a summary of her ultimate betrayal. The use of strong, condemnatory language like "haughty" and "abomination" creates a sense of Hyperbole when considered in the broader context of Jerusalem's sins being worse than Sodom's, emphasizing the profound depth of their spiritual depravity. The Cause and Effect relationship is explicitly stated with "therefore," clearly linking Jerusalem's sins to God's judgment. The phrase "as I saw good" serves as a powerful statement of Divine Sovereignty, asserting God's ultimate authority and wisdom in His actions, even in the context of severe punishment. This phrase also contains a subtle Anthropomorphism, attributing human-like sight and discernment to God, making His judgment more relatable while maintaining His transcendence.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Ezekiel 16:50 serves as a stark reminder of the profound consequences of spiritual pride and covenant unfaithfulness. It illustrates that God's judgment is not arbitrary but a righteous response to persistent rebellion and the commission of acts abhorrent to His holy character. The verse highlights the gravity of sin, particularly when committed by those in a covenant relationship with God, underscoring that privilege brings greater responsibility. It also reinforces the theme of God's unwavering justice, demonstrating that while He is merciful, He is also perfectly righteous and will act decisively to uphold His holiness and the integrity of His covenant. This judgment, though severe, is always purposeful, aimed at discipline and ultimately, restoration, as seen in the later promises of the book of Ezekiel.

Reflection and Application

Ezekiel 16:50 offers timeless warnings and profound insights for contemporary believers. The sins of haughtiness and abomination are not confined to ancient Israel but manifest in various forms today. Spiritual pride, characterized by self-sufficiency, a refusal to acknowledge God's authority, or an overestimation of one's own righteousness, remains a dangerous precursor to spiritual downfall. Similarly, "abominations" in a modern context can include anything that defiles God's holiness, whether it be idolatry of material possessions, self, or ideologies, or engaging in practices that contradict biblical morality. This verse calls us to profound humility, recognizing our absolute dependence on God and submitting to His righteous standards. It reminds us that God's justice is sure, and while His patience is vast, persistent rebellion will inevitably lead to consequences, whether personal or societal. Therefore, a posture of continuous repentance, seeking God's face, and aligning our lives with His will is not merely advisable but essential for spiritual vitality and avoiding the pitfalls of pride and sin.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what areas of my life might I be exhibiting spiritual haughtiness or self-sufficiency, rather than humble dependence on God?
  2. What "abominations" (practices or attitudes detestable to God) might I be tolerating or even committing in my own life or in the broader culture around me?
  3. How does understanding God's sovereign judgment in Ezekiel 16:50 deepen my appreciation for His mercy and grace in Christ?
  4. What steps can I take to cultivate a heart of humility and a greater sensitivity to God's holiness in my daily walk?

FAQ

What does "haughty" mean in this context, and why was it so offensive to God?

In Ezekiel 16:50, "haughty" (Hebrew: gâbahh) refers to Jerusalem's spiritual pride, arrogance, and self-exaltation. This was offensive to God because it represented a fundamental rejection of their covenant relationship. God had graciously elevated Jerusalem from nothing, as described in Ezekiel 16:1-7, lavishing His blessings upon her. Her haughtiness was a betrayal of this grace, implying self-sufficiency and a disregard for the One who had given her everything. It led her to trust in her own strength and pagan alliances rather than in God, directly violating the first commandment to have no other gods before Him. Pride is consistently condemned in Scripture as a root sin that leads to rebellion and ultimately, destruction (e.g., Proverbs 16:18).

What kind of "abominations" did Jerusalem commit?

The term "abomination" (Hebrew: tôwʻêbah) in Ezekiel 16:50 encompasses a wide range of detestable acts that violated God's holy character and covenant laws. The broader context of Ezekiel 16 and other prophetic books reveals these included pervasive idolatry, where Jerusalem worshipped foreign gods and built high places (e.g., Ezekiel 16:16-19). Most horrifyingly, it included child sacrifice to pagan deities like Molech (e.g., Ezekiel 16:20-21). Beyond religious offenses, "abomination" also covered severe moral corruption, sexual perversions, and social injustices that permeated their society, demonstrating a complete disregard for God's ethical standards. These acts were not just sins, but deeply offensive affronts to God's holiness, making them "abominable before me."

What does "therefore I took them away as I saw good" refer to?

This phrase refers to God's sovereign act of judgment, specifically the Babylonian exile. The "therefore" clearly links Jerusalem's haughtiness and abominations as the direct cause for God's intervention. "I took them away" signifies that the exile was not a random historical event but a deliberate, purposeful act initiated by God Himself. The phrase "as I saw good" emphasizes God's perfect wisdom, justice, and righteous discretion in executing this judgment. It means that His actions were not arbitrary or impulsive, but were carefully considered, just, and aligned with His divine character and purposes, even though they involved severe punishment and the removal of His people from His promised land. This underscores God's ultimate control over history and His commitment to upholding His covenant, even through discipline.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Ezekiel 16:50, with its stark portrayal of Israel's haughtiness and abominations leading to divine judgment, powerfully foreshadows the profound need for a radical transformation that only Christ can provide. Israel's failure to uphold the covenant, marked by pride and detestable acts, demonstrated humanity's inherent inability to achieve righteousness through law-keeping. This verse, therefore, points to the necessity of a new covenant, one not dependent on human obedience but on divine grace. Jesus Christ, the ultimate Lamb of God (as proclaimed in John 1:29), perfectly fulfilled the law and offered Himself as the atoning sacrifice for sin, thereby taking away the "abominations" that separate humanity from God. Where Israel was "haughty," Christ demonstrated ultimate humility, emptying Himself and taking the form of a servant (as described in Philippians 2:5-8). Through His death and resurrection, He inaugurated a new way for humanity to be reconciled to God, not by their works or freedom from "abominations" but by faith in His finished work. The judgment of "taking them away" ultimately culminates in Christ bearing the judgment for all who believe, so that through Him, we might be brought near to God, receiving a new heart and a new spirit (as promised in Ezekiel 36:26-27), enabling us to walk in His statutes and truly please Him, something Israel failed to do. Thus, Ezekiel 16:50, while detailing Israel's failure and judgment, ultimately magnifies the glorious and necessary work of Christ as the only means of true restoration and righteousness.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Ezekiel 16:44–59. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 16 verses
Passage under commentEzekiel 16:44–59
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

The prophet here further shows Jerusalem her abominations, by comparing her with those places that had gone before her, and showing that she was worse than any of them, and therefore should, like them, be utterly and irreparably ruined. We are all apt to judge of ourselves by comparison, and to imagine that we are sufficiently good if we are but as good as such and such, who are thought passable; or that we are not dangerously bad if we are no worse than such and such, who, though bad, are not of the worst. Now God by the prophet shows Jerusalem,

I.That she was as bad as her mother, that is, as the accursed devoted Canaanites that were the possessors of this land before her.

Those that use proverbs, as most people do, shall apply that proverb to Jerusalem, As is the mother, so is her daughter, Eze 16:44. She is her mother's own child. The Jews are as like the Canaanites in temper and inclination as if they had been their own children. The character of the mother was that she loathed her husband and her children, she had all the marks of an adulteress; and that is the character of the daughter: she forsakes the guide of her youth, and is barbarous to the children of her own bowels. When God brought Israel into Canaan he particularly warned them not to do according to the abominations of the men of that land, who went before them (for which it had spued them out, Lev 18:27, Lev 18:28), the monuments of whose idolatry, with the remains of the idolaters themselves, would be a continual temptation to them; but they learned their way, and trod in their steps, and were as well affected to the idols of Canaan as ever they were (Psa 106:38), and thus, in respect of imitation, it might truly be said that their mother was a Hittite and their father an Amorite (Eze 16:45), for they resembled them more than Abraham and Sarah.

II.That she was worse than her sisters Sodom and Samaria, that were adulteresses too, that loathed their husbands and their children, that were weary of the gods of their fathers, and were for introducing new gods, a-la-mode - quite in style, that came newly up, and new fashions in religion, and were given to change. On this comparison between Jerusalem and her sisters the prophet here enlarges, that he might either shame them into repentance or justify God in their ruin. Observe,

1.Who Jerusalem's sisters were, Eze 16:45. Samaria and Sodom. Samaria is called the elder sister, or rather the greater, because it was a much larger city and kingdom, richer and more considerable, and more nearly allied to Israel. If Jerusalem look northward, this is partly on her left hand. This city of Samaria, and the towns and villages, that were as daughters to that mother-city, these had been lately destroyed for their spiritual whoredom. Sodom, and the adjacent towns and villages that were her daughters, dwelt at Jerusalem's right hand, and was her less sister, less than Jerusalem, less than Samaria, and these were of old destroyed for their corporeal whoredom, Jde 1:7.

2.Wherein Jerusalem's sins resembled her sisters', particularly Sodom's (v. 49): This was the iniquity of Sodom (it is implied, and this is thy iniquity too), pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness. Their going after strange flesh, which was Sodom's most flagrant wickedness, is not mentioned, because notoriously known, but those sins which did not look so black, but opened the door and led the way to these more enormous crimes, and began to fill that measure of her sins, which was filled up at length by their unnatural filthiness. Now these initiating sins were,

(1.)Pride, in which the heart lifts up itself above and against both God and man. Pride was the first sin that turned angels into devils, and the garden of the Lord into a hell upon earth. It was the pride of the Sodomites that they despised righteous Lot, and would not bear to be reproved by him; and this ripened them for ruin.

(2.)Gluttony, here called fulness of bread. It was God's great mercy that they had plenty, but their great sin that they abused it, glutted themselves with it, ate to excess and drank to excess, and made that the gratification of their lusts which was given them to be the support of their lives.

(3.)Idleness, abundance of idleness, a dread of labour and a love of ease. Their country was fruitful, and the abundance they had they came easily by, which was a temptation to them to indulge themselves in sloth, which disposed them to all that abominable filthiness which kindled their flames. Note, Idleness is an inlet to much sin. The men of Sodom, who were idle, were wicked, and sinners before the Lord exceedingly, Gen 13:13. The standing waters gather filth and the sitting bird is the fowler's mark. When David arose from off his bed at evening he saw Bathsheba. Quaeritur, Aegisthus quare sit factus adulter? In promptu causa est; desidiosus erat - What made Aegisthus an adulterer? Indolence.

(4.)Oppression: Neither did she strengthen the hands of the poor and needy; probably it is implied that she weakened their hands and broke their arms; however, it was bad enough that, when she had so much wealth, and consequently power and interest and leisure, she did nothing for the relief of the poor, in providing for whose wants those that themselves are full of bread may employ their time well; they need not be so abundantly idle as too often they are. These were the sins of the Sodomites, and these were Jerusalem's sins. Their pride, the cause of their sins, is mentioned again (Eze 16:50): They were haughty, with the horrid effects of their sins, their abominations which they committed before God. Men arrive gradually at the height of impiety and wickedness. Nemo repente fit turpissimus - No man reaches the height of vice at once. But, where pride has got the ascendant in a man, he is in the high road to all abominations.

3.How much the sins of Jerusalem exceeded those of Sodom and Samaria; they were more heinous in the sight of God, either in themselves or by reason of several aggravations: "Thou hast not only walked after their ways, and trod in their steps, but hast quite outdone them in wickedness, Eze 16:47. Thou thoughtest it a very little thing to do as they did; didst laugh at them as sneaking sinners and silly ones; thou wouldst be more cunning, more daring, in wickedness, wouldst triumph more boldly over thy convictions, and bid more open defiance to God and religion: 'if a man will break, let him break for something.' Thus thou wast corrupted more than they in all thy ways." Jerusalem was more polite, and therefore sinned with more wit, more art and ingenuity, than Sodom and Samaria could. Jerusalem had more wealth and power, and its government was more absolute and arbitrary, and therefore had the more opportunity of oppressing the poor, and shedding malignant influences around her, than Sodom and Samaria had. Jerusalem had the temple, and the ark, and the priesthood, and kings of the house of David; and therefore the wickedness of that holy city, that was so dignified, so near, so dear to God, was more provoking to him than the wickedness of Sodom and Samaria, that had not Jerusalem's privileges and means of grace. Sodom has not done as thou hast done, Eze 16:48. This agrees with what Christ says. Mat 11:24, It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment than for thee. The kingdom of the ten tribes had been very wicked; and yet Samaria has not committed half thy sins (Eze 16:51), has not worshipped half so many idols, nor slain half so many prophets. It was bad enough that those of Jerusalem were guilty of Sodom's sins, Sodomy itself not excepted, Kg1 14:24; Kg2 23:7. And though the Dead Sea, the standing monument of Sodom's sin and ruin, bordered upon their country (Num 34:12), and that sulphureous lake was always under their nose (God having taken away Sodom and her daughters in such way and manner as he saw good, as he says here, Eze 16:50, so as that one thing should effectually make their overthrow an example to those that afterwards should live ungodly, Pe2 2:6), yet they did not take warning, but multiplied their abominations more than they; and,

(1.)By this they justified Sodom and Samaria, Eze 16:51. They pretended, in their haughtiness and superciliousness, to judge them, and in the days of old, when they retained their integrity, they did judge them, Eze 16:52. But now they justify them comparatively: Sodom and Samaria are more righteous than thou, that is, less wicked. It will look like some extenuation of their sins that, bad as they were, Jerusalem was worse, though it was God's own city. Not that it will serve for a plea to justify Sodom, but it condemns Jerusalem, against which Sodom and Samaria will rise up in judgment.

(2.)For this they ought themselves to be greatly ashamed: "Thou who hast judged thy sisters, and cried out shame on them, now bear thy own shame, for thy sins which thou hast committed, which, though of the same kind with theirs, yet, being committed by thee, are more abominable than theirs," Eze 16:52. This may be taken either as foretelling their ruin (Thou shalt bear thy shame) or as inviting them to repentance: "Be thou confounded and bear thy shame; take the shame to thyself that is due to thee." It may be hoped that sinners will forsake their sins when they begin to be heartily ashamed of them. And therefore they shall go into captivity, and there they shall lie, that they may be confounded in all that they have done, because they had been a comfort and encouragement to Sodom and Samaria, Eze 16:54. Note, There is nothing in sin which we have more reason to be ashamed of than this, that by our sin we have encouraged others in sin, and comforted them in that for which they must be grieved or they are undone. Another reason why they must now be ashamed is because in the day of their prosperity they had looked with so much disdain upon their neighbours: Thy sister Sodom was not mentioned by thee in the day of they pride, Eze 16:56. They thought Sodom not worthy to be named the same day with Jerusalem, little dreaming that Jerusalem would at length lie under a worse and more scandalous character than Sodom herself. Those that are high may perhaps come to stand upon a level with those they contemn. Or "Sodom was not mentioned, that is, the warning designed to be given to thee by Sodom's ruin was not regarded." If the Jews had but talked more frequently and seriously to one another, and to their children, concerning the wrath of God revealed from heaven against Sodom's ungodliness and unrighteousness, it might have kept them in awe, and prevented their treading in their steps; but they kept the thought of it at a distance, would not bear the mention of it, and (as the ancients say) put Isaiah to death for putting them in mind of it, when he called them rulers of Sodom and people of Gomorrah, Isa 1:10. Note, Those are but preparing judgments for themselves that will not take notice of God's judgments upon others.

4.What desolations God had brought and was bringing upon Jerusalem for these wickednesses, wherein they had exceeded Sodom and Samaria.

(1.)She has already long ago been disgraced, and has fallen into contempt, among her neighbours (Eze 16:57): Before her wickedness was discovered, before she came to be so grossly and openly flagitious, she bore the just punishment of her secret and more concealed lewdness, when she fell under the reproach of the daughters of Syria, of the Philistines, who were said to despise her and be ashamed of her (Eze 16:27), and under the reproach of all that were round about her, which seems to refer to the descent made upon Judah by the Syrians in the days of Ahaz, and soon after another by the Philistines, Ch2 28:5, Ch2 28:18. Note, Those that disgrace themselves by yielding to their lusts will justly be brought into disgrace by being made to yield to their enemies; and it is observable that before God brought potent enemies upon them, for their destruction, he brought enemies upon them that were less formidable, for their reproach. If less judgments would do the work, God would not send greater. In this thou hast borne thy lewdness, Eze 16:58. Those that will not cast off their sins by repentance and reformation shall be made to bear their sins to their confusion.

(2.)She is now in captivity, or hastening into captivity, and therein is reckoned with, not only for her lewdness (Eze 16:58), but for her perfidiousness and covenant-breaking (Eze 16:59): "I will deal with thee as thou hast done; I will forsake thee as thou hast forsaken me, and cast thee off as thou hast cast me off, for thou hast despised the oath, in breaking the covenant." This seems to be meant of the covenant God made with their fathers at Mount Sinai, whereby he took them and theirs to be a peculiar people to himself. They flattered themselves with a conceit that because God had hitherto continued his favour to them, notwithstanding their provocations, he would do so still. "No," says God, "you have broken covenant with me, have despised both the promises of the covenant and the obligations of it, and therefore I will deal with thee as thou hast done." Note, Those that will not adhere to God as their God have no reason to expect that he should continue to own them as his people.

(3.)The captivity of the wicked Jews, and their ruin, shall be as irrevocable as that of Sodom and Samaria. In this sense, as a threatening, most interpreters take Eze 16:53, Eze 16:55. "When I shall bring again the captivity of Sodom and Samaria, and when they shall return to their former estate, then I will bring again the captivity of thy captives in the midst of them, and as it were for their sakes, and under their shadow and protection, because they are more righteous than thou, and then thou shalt return to thy former estate," But Sodom and Samaria were never brought back, nor ever returned to their former estate, and therefore let not Jerusalem expect it, that is, those who now remained there, whom God would deliver to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth for their hurt, Jer 24:9, Jer 24:10. Sooner shall the Sodomites arise out of the salt sea, and the Samaritans return out of the land of Assyria, than they enjoy their peace and prosperity again; for, to their shame be it spoken, it is a comfort to those of the ten tribes, who are dispersed and in captivity, to see those of the two tribes who had been as bad as they, or worse, in like manner dispersed and in captivity; and therefore they shall live and die, shall stand and fall, together. The bad ones of both shall perish together; the good ones of both shall return together. Note, Those who do as the worst of sinners do must expect to fare as they fare. Let my enemy be as the wicked.

Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Ezekiel 16:50 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8