Skip to content
“The Ram and the Goat”· Daniel 8:3–8
Translation
King James Version
Therefore the he goat waxed very great: and when he was strong, the great horn was broken; and for it came up four notable ones toward the four winds of heaven.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Therefore the he H6842 goat H5795 waxed very H3966 great H1431: and when he was strong H6105, the great H1419 horn H7161 was broken H7665; and for it came up H5927 four H702 notable ones H2380 toward the four H702 winds H7307 of heaven H8064.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The male goat then became extremely strong; but when it was strong, the big horn was broken; and in its place arose what appeared to be four horns in the directions of the four winds of heaven.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Thus the goat became very great, but at the height of his power, his large horn was broken off, and four prominent horns came up in its place, pointing toward the four winds of heaven.
Ask
American Standard Version
And the he-goat magnified himself exceedingly: and when he was strong, the great horn was broken; and instead of it there came up four notable horns toward the four winds of heaven.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The male goat magnified himself exceedingly: and when he was strong, the great horn was broken; and instead of it there came up four notable horns toward the four winds of the sky.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Therefore the goate waxed exceeding great, and when he was at the strongest, his great horne was broken: and for it came vp foure that appeared toward the foure windes of ye heauen.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
`And the young he-goat hath exerted itself very much, and when it is strong, broken hath been the great horn; and come up doth a vision of four in its place, at the four winds of the heavens.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 21,970 of 31,102 · 70.6%

Study This Verse

Summary

Daniel 8:8 stands as a remarkable prophetic declaration within Daniel's vision of the ram and the he-goat, precisely foretelling the meteoric rise and subsequent fragmentation of the Grecian Empire. It vividly describes the he-goat, representing Alexander the Great, achieving unparalleled power before his "great horn," symbolizing his singular dominion, is abruptly shattered. In its place, four "notable ones" emerge, signifying the division of his vast empire among his four leading generals, spreading their influence "toward the four winds of heaven." This verse powerfully underscores God's sovereign control over the trajectory of human history, revealing His meticulous foresight in the rise and fall of earthly kingdoms.

Context

Literary Context

Daniel 8:8 is intricately woven into Daniel's second major apocalyptic vision, recorded in Daniel chapter 8. This vision, delivered in the third year of King Belshazzar's reign (c. 550 BC), provides a more focused and detailed prophetic narrative compared to the broader sweep of Gentile empires presented in Daniel chapter 7. While Daniel chapter 7 outlines four successive world empires, Daniel chapter 8 specifically zeroes in on the Medo-Persian and Grecian empires, culminating in the rise of a "little horn" (distinct from the one in Daniel 7:8) that is widely interpreted as Antiochus IV Epiphanes. The immediate preceding verses (Daniel 8:5-7) vividly describe the he-goat's swift and furious attack, utterly defeating the ram (Medo-Persia), thereby setting the stage for the he-goat's unprecedented ascent to power, which is then abruptly curtailed in Daniel 8:8.

Historical & Cultural Context

The vision of Daniel chapter 8 was received by Daniel centuries before its fulfillment, providing an astonishing testament to divine foreknowledge. The "he goat" is explicitly identified in Daniel 8:21 as the "king of Grecia," a designation universally understood by scholars to refer to Alexander the Great and his Hellenistic Empire. Alexander's military campaigns, commencing in 334 BC, were characterized by their astonishing speed and overwhelming success, leading to the rapid conquest of the vast Persian Empire within a mere decade. His sudden and unexpected death in 323 BC, at the zenith of his power and without a clear successor, plunged his empire into a protracted period of conflict among his leading generals, known as the Diadochi (successors). The subsequent division of his vast dominion into four primary Hellenistic kingdoms—Ptolemaic Egypt, Seleucid Syria, Antigonid Macedonia, and Lysimachian Thrace/Asia Minor—is a meticulously documented historical reality that precisely fulfills the prophecy of the "four notable ones." Within the ancient Near Eastern cultural milieu, horns were potent and widely recognized symbols of power, strength, and dominion, particularly in relation to kings and kingdoms, rendering the imagery of the "great horn" and its sudden breakage profoundly evocative of a king's rise and fall.

Key Themes

This verse serves as a cornerstone for several profound themes woven throughout the book of Daniel. Firstly, it powerfully underscores God's sovereignty over human history, demonstrating unequivocally that the rise and fall of empires are not random occurrences or solely the product of human ambition, but are meticulously orchestrated within God's immutable divine plan. The astonishing accuracy and specificity of the prophecy, detailing events centuries in advance, profoundly reinforces the theme of divine omniscience and the absolute reliability of God's revealed Word. Secondly, it highlights the inherent transience of earthly power; even the most formidable human empires, exemplified by Alexander's, are ultimately temporary and subject to divine decree. This stands in stark contrast to the enduring and eternal nature of God's kingdom, a theme consistently presented throughout Daniel, particularly in the prophecy of the stone that shatters all earthly kingdoms in Daniel 2:44 and the everlasting dominion granted to the saints of the Most High in Daniel 7:27. Finally, the detailed nature of this prophecy serves to bolster faith in God's ultimate control and the certainty of His future plans, providing profound assurance and hope to those living in turbulent and uncertain times.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

great gâdôwl' H1431

Derived from H1431 (gâdal), this term signifies something large in various senses, encompassing physical size, mental capacity, estate, or honor. In the context of Daniel 8:8, it emphatically describes the immense scale of the he-goat's (Alexander's) power and the vastness of his conquests, indicating an unparalleled and extraordinary rise to dominion. The intensifying adverb "very" (H3966, mᵉʼôd) further amplifies this meaning, underscoring the truly exceptional magnitude of his might and influence.

broken shâbar' H7665

This primitive root denotes "to burst (literally or figuratively)," conveying a sudden, forceful, and complete cessation or destruction. Applied to the "great horn," it vividly portrays the abrupt and unexpected end of Alexander's reign and life at the zenith of his power, rather than a gradual decline or erosion. This term conveys the divine decree behind the event, signaling an act of God's sovereign intervention in human affairs, bringing a mighty empire to an immediate halt.

notable ones châzûwth' H2380

Originating from H2380 (châzâh), which means "a look" or "striking appearance," this term implies something conspicuous, significant, or clearly visible. In the context of the four horns, it highlights that the successor kingdoms were not minor, ephemeral factions but distinct, powerful entities that emerged prominently and unmistakably from the shattered empire. Each held significant dominion, fulfilling the prophetic vision with undeniable clarity and historical prominence.

Verse Breakdown

"Therefore the he goat waxed very great:"

This initial clause describes the unprecedented and rapid expansion of the Grecian Empire under the leadership of Alexander the Great. The "he goat," explicitly identified in Daniel 8:21 as the King of Grecia, achieved a level of power and territorial control that was truly immense, "waxing very great" in its influence and dominion across the ancient world. This vividly portrays Alexander's swift and overwhelming military campaigns that conquered the vast Persian Empire with astonishing speed.

"and when he was strong, the great horn was broken;"

This phrase marks a dramatic and sudden turning point in the prophecy. It indicates that at the very peak of his strength and imperial power, symbolized by the "great horn" (representing Alexander's singular and dominant reign), this power was abruptly and unexpectedly "broken." This precisely foretells Alexander's premature death in 323 BC, which occurred when his empire was at its strongest and most expansive, shocking the world and leaving an immense power vacuum.

"and for it came up four notable ones toward the four winds of heaven."

This final clause prophesies the immediate aftermath of the "great horn's" breakage. In place of Alexander's unified, singular empire, four distinct, significant, and conspicuous powers ("notable ones") arose. The phrase "toward the four winds of heaven" indicates that these four successor kingdoms would be geographically dispersed, extending their rule in different directions, accurately depicting the historical division of Alexander's empire among his four leading generals (Cassander, Lysimachus, Seleucus, and Ptolemy) into separate Hellenistic dynasties that dominated the ancient world for centuries.

Literary Devices

Daniel 8:8 is replete with Symbolism, a foundational literary device in apocalyptic literature. The "he goat" serves as a clear symbol for the Grecian Empire, and its "great horn" specifically represents Alexander the Great and his singular, dominant power. The subsequent "four notable ones" symbolize the four successor kingdoms that emerged from his fragmented empire after his death. The "four winds of heaven" is a symbolic phrase indicating the global reach and distinct geographical directions of these divided kingdoms, spreading their influence across the known world. The verse also employs profound Prophetic Language and Foreshadowing, as it describes events that would unfold centuries after Daniel's time with remarkable precision, demonstrating God's foreknowledge and His absolute control over historical outcomes. Furthermore, the abruptness of the phrase "was broken" utilizes Juxtaposition to highlight the sudden and unexpected end of Alexander's reign at the very height of his strength, powerfully emphasizing the inherent fragility and transience of human power, even at its zenith.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Daniel 8:8 powerfully illustrates the overarching biblical theme of God's absolute sovereignty over all earthly kingdoms and the entirety of human history. It reveals that the rise and fall of empires, often perceived as chaotic or solely determined by human ambition and military might, are in fact meticulously orchestrated according to God's immutable divine plan. The astonishing precision of this prophecy, detailing Alexander's meteoric rise, his sudden death at the peak of his power, and the subsequent division of his empire into four distinct realms, serves as irrefutable evidence of God's omniscience and His active, providential involvement in the affairs of nations. This divine control ensures that ultimately, all human history moves towards the fulfillment of His ultimate purposes, culminating in the establishment of His eternal kingdom, which will never be destroyed or given to another people. This profound truth provides immense comfort and unwavering assurance to believers, reminding them that their ultimate hope and security rest not in the stability or power of human governments, but in the unchanging, all-powerful, and everlasting reign of God.

Reflection and Application

The detailed and precisely fulfilled prophecy in Daniel 8:8 offers profound and enduring insights for contemporary believers. It serves as a powerful and tangible reminder that God is not a distant, disengaged observer but the active, meticulous director of all history, carefully weaving even the most dramatic and seemingly unpredictable events into His grand, unfolding tapestry. In a world frequently characterized by political instability, the rise and fall of nations, and the shifting sands of power, this verse firmly anchors our faith in an unchanging God who knows the end from the beginning. It profoundly encourages us to look beyond the immediate circumstances and to place our unwavering trust in His ultimate plan, which will undeniably culminate in the establishment of His eternal kingdom. This understanding should cultivate within us a deep sense of peace, confidence, and spiritual resilience, freeing us from anxiety about worldly affairs and empowering us to live with purpose and courage, knowing that our efforts for His kingdom are part of a larger, divinely ordained narrative. It calls us to recognize that true power and lasting dominion belong only to God, and therefore, our ultimate allegiance and hope should be to Him and His divine purposes, rather than to transient earthly authorities or fleeting human achievements.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How does the precise historical fulfillment of Daniel 8:8 strengthen your faith in the absolute reliability of God's Word and His sovereign control over all of history?
  2. In what practical ways might focusing on God's unwavering sovereignty, as so clearly revealed in this prophecy, help you navigate current global uncertainties or personal anxieties?
  3. Considering the profound depiction of the transience of even the mightiest earthly power in this verse, what does this passage teach you about where to place your ultimate hope, security, and allegiance?

FAQ

Who is the "he goat" and the "great horn" in Daniel 8:8?

The "he goat" in Daniel's vision is explicitly identified in Daniel 8:21 as the "king of Grecia," which is universally understood by biblical scholars and historians to represent the Grecian Empire. The "great horn" refers to Alexander the Great, the empire's most prominent, powerful, and singular king, whose meteoric rise and vast conquests established Greek dominion over the ancient world with astonishing speed and success.

What does it mean that "the great horn was broken" and "four notable ones" came up?

The breaking of the "great horn" precisely foretold the sudden and premature death of Alexander the Great in 323 BC, which occurred at the very height of his power and imperial expansion. He died without a clear or established successor, leading to a period of intense conflict and power struggles among his leading generals. The "four notable ones" refer to the four prominent generals (known as the Diadochi) who eventually divided Alexander's vast empire among themselves after his death. These were Cassander (who took control of Macedonia and Greece), Lysimachus (Thrace and parts of Asia Minor), Seleucus (Syria, Babylon, and the eastern territories), and Ptolemy (Egypt and Palestine). This historical division is further elaborated upon in Daniel 8:22, confirming the accuracy of Daniel's prophecy.

Why is this prophecy so significant for believers today?

This prophecy is highly significant because its astonishing historical accuracy, foretelling events centuries in advance with remarkable precision, provides compelling and irrefutable evidence for the divine inspiration of Scripture and God's absolute sovereignty over human history. It assures believers that God is not merely a distant observer but the active and meticulous director of all events, orchestrating the rise and fall of nations according to His perfect and unchangeable plan. This profound understanding strengthens faith, provides immense comfort in times of global instability, and reminds us that God's ultimate purposes will prevail, culminating in the establishment of His eternal kingdom, as powerfully hinted at in passages like Daniel 2:44, which speaks of a kingdom that will never be destroyed.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

While Daniel 8:8 specifically details the rise and fall of the Grecian Empire, its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment lies in the stark and profound contrast it presents between the temporary, fragile nature of all human kingdoms and the eternal, unshakable dominion of Jesus Christ. Alexander the Great, depicted as the "great horn," rose to unprecedented power and established a vast empire, yet his dominion was abruptly shattered by his sudden death, leading to fragmentation and division. This serves as a powerful and enduring testament to the inherent fragility and transience of all earthly power structures, no matter how mighty or seemingly invincible. In striking contrast, the New Testament reveals Jesus Christ as the true and eternal King, the one who not only created all things but also "upholds the universe by the word of his power" (Hebrews 1:3). Unlike Alexander, whose kingdom was broken and divided, Christ's kingdom "shall never be destroyed" and "shall stand forever" (Daniel 2:44). He is the one "through whom all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him" (Colossians 1:16), and His reign is not subject to human mortality, political fragmentation, or the passage of time. The "four notable ones" represented a divided kingdom, but Christ's kingdom is unified under one head, Himself, and will ultimately encompass all nations, as declared in the triumphant proclamation of Revelation 11:15, where "The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ, and he shall reign forever and ever." Thus, Daniel 8:8, in its vivid depiction of a powerful but ultimately broken earthly kingdom, powerfully points forward to the supreme, everlasting, and undivided reign of the Messiah, Jesus, whose dominion knows no end and whose kingdom will never pass away.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Daniel 8:1–14. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 14 verses
Passage under commentDaniel 8:1–14
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Here is, I. The date of this vision, Dan 8:1. It was in the third year of the reign of Belshazzar, which proved to be his last year, as many reckon; so that this chapter also should be, in order of time, before the fifth. That Daniel might not be surprised at the destruction of Babylon, now at hand, God gives him a foresight of the destruction of other kingdoms hereafter, which in their day had been as potent as that of Babylon. Could we foresee the changes that shall be hereafter, when we are gone, we should the less admire, and be less affected with, the changes in our own day; for that which is done is that which shall be done, Ecc 1:9. Then it was that a vision appeared to me, even to me, Daniel. Here he solemnly attests the truth of it: it was to him, even to him, that the vision was shown; he was the eye-witness of it. And this vision puts him in mind of a former vision which appeared to him at the first, in the first year of this reign, which he makes mention of because this vision was an explication and confirmation of that, and points at many of the same events. That seems to have been a dream, a vision in his sleep; this seems to have been when he was awake.

II.The scene of this vision.

The place where that was laid was in Shushan the palace, one of the royal seats of the kings of Persia, situated on the banks of the river Ulai, which surrounded the city; it was in the province of Elam, that part of Persia which lay next to Babylon. Daniel was not there in person, for he was now in Babylon, a captive, in some employment under Belshazzar, and might not go to such a distant country, especially being now an enemy's country. But he was there in vision; as Ezekiel, when a captive in Babylon, was often brought, in the spirit, to the land of Israel. Note, The soul may be a liberty when the body is in captivity; for, when we are bound, the Spirit of the Lord is not bound. The vision related to that country, and therefore there he was made to fancy himself to be as strongly as if he had really been there.

III.The vision itself and the process of it.

1.He saw a ram with two horns, Dan 8:3. This was the second monarchy, of which the kingdoms of Media and Persia were the two horns. The horns were very high; but that which came up last was the higher, and got the start of the former. So the last shall be first, and the first last. The kingdom of Persia, which rose last, in Cyrus, became more eminent than that of the Medes.

2.He saw this ram pushing all about him with his horns (Dan 8:4), westward (towards Babylon, Syria, Greece, and Asia the less), northward (towards the Lydians, Armenians, and Scythians), and southward (towards Arabia, Ethiopia, and Egypt), for all these nations did the Persian empire, one time or other, make attempts upon for the enlarging of their dominion. And at last he became so powerful that no beasts might stand before him. This ram, though of a species of animal often preyed upon, became formidable even to the beasts of prey themselves, so that there was no standing before him, no escaping him, none that could deliver out of his hand, but all must yield to him: the kings of Persia did according to their will, prospered in all their ways abroad, had an uncontrollable power at home, and became great. He thought himself great because he did what he would; but to do good is that which makes men truly great.

3.He saw this ram overcome by a he-goat. He was considering the ram (wondering that so weak an animal should come to be so prevalent) and thinking what would be the issue; and, behold, a he-goat came, Dan 8:5. This was Alexander the Great, the son of Philip king of Macedonia. He came from the west, from Greece, which lay west from Persia. He fetched a great compass with his army: he came upon the face of the whole earth; he did in effect conquer the world, and then sat down and wept because there was not another world to be conquered. Unus Pellaeo juveni non sufficit orbis - One world was too little for the youth of Pellae. This he-goat (a creature famed for comeliness in going, Pro 30:31) went on with incredible swiftness, so that he touched not the ground, so lightly did he move; he rather seemed to fly above the ground than to go upon the ground; or none touched him in the earth, that is, he met with little or no opposition. This he-goat, or buck, had a notable horn between his eyes, like a unicorn. He had strength, and knew his own strength; he saw himself a match for all his neighbours. Alexander pushed his conquests on so fast, and with so much fury, that none of the kingdoms he attacked had courage to make a stand, or give check to the progress of his victorious arms. In six years he made himself master of the greatest part of the then known world. Well might he be called a notable horn, for his name still lives in history as the name of one of the most celebrated commanders in war that ever the world knew. Alexander's victories and achievements are still the entertainment of the ingenious. This he-goat came to the ram that had two horns, Dan 8:6. Alexander with his victorious army attacked the kingdom of Persia, an army consisting of no more than 30,000 foot and 5000 horse. He ran unto him, to surprise him ere he could get intelligence of his motions, in the fury of his power. He came close to the ram. Alexander with his army came up with Darius Codomannus, then emperor of Persia, being moved with choler against him, Dan 8:7. It was with the greatest violence that Alexander pushed on his war against Darius, who, though he brought vast numbers into the field, yet, for want of skill, was an unequal match for him, so that Alexander was too hard for him whenever he engaged him, smote him, cast him down to the ground, and stamped upon him, which three expressions, some think, refer to the three famous victories that Alexander obtained over Darius, at Granicus, at Issus, and at Arbela, by which he was at length totally routed, having, in the last battle, had 600,000 men killed, so that Alexander became absolute master of all the Persian empire, broke his two horns, the kingdoms of Media and Persia. The ram that had destroyed all before him (Dan 8:4) now is himself destroyed; Darius has no power to stand before Alexander, not has he any friends or allies to help to deliver him out of his hand. Note, Those kingdoms which, when they had power, abused it, and, because none could oppose them, withheld not themselves from the doing of any wrong, may expect to have their power at length taken from them, and to be served in their own kind, Isa 33:1.

4.He saw the he-goat made hereby very considerable; but the great horn, that had done all this execution, was broken, Dan 8:8. Alexander was about twenty years old when he began his wars. When he was about twenty-six he conquered Darius, and became master of the whole Persian empire; but when he was about thirty-two or thirty-three years of age, when he was strong, in his full strength, he was broken. He was not killed in war, in the bed of honour, but died of a drunken surfeit, or, as some suspect, by poison and left no child living behind him to enjoy that which he had endlessly laboured for, but left a lasting monument of the vanity of worldly pomp and power, and their insufficiency to make a man happy.

5.He saw this kingdom divided into four parts, and that instead of that one great horn there came up four notable ones, Alexander's four captains, to whom he bequeathed his conquests; and he had so much that, when it was divided among four, they had each of them enough for any one man. These four notable horns were towards the four winds of heaven, the same with the four heads of the leopard (Dan 7:6), the kingdoms of Syria and Egypt, Asia and Greece - Syria lying to the east, Greece to the west, Asia Minor to the north, and Egypt to the south. Note, Those that heap up riches know not who shall gather them, nor whose all those things shall be which they have provided.

6.He saw a little horn which became a great persecutor of the church and people of God; and this was the principal thing that was intended to be shown to him in this vision, as afterwards, Dan 11:30, etc. All agree that this was Antiochus Epiphanes (so he called himself) - the illustrious, but others called him Antiochus Epimanes - Antiochus the furious. He is called here (as before, Dan 7:8), a little horn, because he was in his original contemptible; there were others between him and the kingdom, and he was of a base servile disposition, had nothing in him of princely qualities, and had been for some time a hostage and prisoner at Rome, whence he made his escape, and, though, the youngest brother, and his elder living, got the kingdom. He waxed exceedingly great towards the south, for he seized upon Egypt, and towards the east, for he invaded Persia and Armenia. But that which is here especially taken notice of is the mischief that he did to the people of the Jews. They are not expressly named, or prophecies must not be too plain; but they are here so described that it would be easy for those who understood scripture-language to know who were meant; and the Jews, having notice of this before, might be awakened to prepare themselves and their children beforehand for these suffering trying times.

(1.)He set himself against the pleasant land, the land of Israel, so called because it was the glory of all lands, for fruitfulness and all the delights of human life, but especially for the tokens of God's presence in it, and its being blessed with divine revelations and institutions; it was Mount Zion that was beautiful for situation, the joy of the whole earth, Psa 48:2. The pleasantness of that land was that there the Messiah was to be born, who would be both the consolation and the glory of his people Israel. Note, We have reason to reckon that a pleasant place which is a holy place, in which God dwells, and where we may have opportunity of communing with him. Surely, It is good to be here.

(2.)He fought against the host of heaven, that is, the people of God, the church, which is the kingdom of heaven, the church-militant here on earth. The saints, being born from above, and citizens of heaven, and doing the will of God, by his grace, in some measure, as the angels of heaven do it, may be well called a heavenly host. Or the priests and Levites, who were employed in the service of the tabernacle, and there warred a good warfare, were this host of heaven. These Antiochus set himself against; he waxed great to the host of heaven, in opposition to them and in defiance of them.

(3.)He cast down some of the host (that is, of the stars, for they are called the host of heaven) to the ground, and stamped upon them. Some of those that were most eminent both in church and state, that were burning and shining lights in their generation, he either forced to comply with his idolatries or put them to death; he got them into his hands, and then trampled upon them and triumphed over them; as good old Eleazar, and the seven brethren, whom he put to death with cruel tortures, because they would not eat swine's flesh, 2 Macc. 6:7. He gloried in it that herein he insulted Heaven itself and exalted his throne above the stars of God, Isa 14:13.

(4.)He magnified himself even to the prince of the host. He set himself against the high priest, Onias, whom he deprived of his dignity, or rather against God himself, who was Israel's King of old, who reigns for ever Zion's King, who himself heads his own host that fight his battles. Against him Antiochus magnified himself; as Pharaoh, when he said, Who is the Lord? Note, Those who persecute the people of God persecute God himself.

(5.)He took away the daily sacrifice. The morning and evening lamb, which God appointed to be offered every day upon his altar to his honour, Antiochus forbade and restrained the offering of. No doubt he took away all other sacrifices, but only the daily sacrifice is mentioned, because that was the greatest loss of all, for in that they kept up their constant communion with God, which they preferred before that which is only occasional. God's people reckon their daily sacrifices, their morning and evening exercises of devotion, the most needful of their daily business and the most delightful of their daily comforts, and would not for all the world part with them.

(6.)He cast down the place of his sanctuary. He did not burn and demolish the temple, but he cast it down, when he profaned it, made it the temple of Jupiter Olympius, and set up his image in it. He also cast down the truth to the ground, trampled upon the book of the law, that word of truth, tore it, and burnt it, and did what he could to destroy it quite, that it might be lost and forgotten for ever. These were the projects of that wicked prince. In these he practised. And (would you think it?) in these he prospered. He carried the matter very far, seemed to have gained his point, and went near to extirpate that holy religion which God's right hand had planted. But lest he or any other should triumph, as if herein he had prevailed against God himself and been too hard for him, the matter is here explained and set in a true light.

[1.]He could not have done this if God had not permitted him to do it, could have had no power against Israel unless it had been given him from above. God put this power into his hand, and gave him a host against the daily sacrifice. God's providence put that sword into his hand by which he was enabled thus to bear down all before him. Note, We ought to eye and own the hand of God in all the enterprises and all the successes of the church's enemies against the church. They are but the rod in God's hand.

[2.]God would not have permitted it if his people had not provoked him to do so. It is by reason of transgression, the transgression of Israel, to correct them for that, that Antiochus is employed to give them all this trouble. Note, When the pleasant land and all its pleasant things are laid waste, it must be acknowledged that sin is the procuring cause of all the desolation. Who gave Jacob to the spoil? Did not the Lord, he against whom we have sinned? Isa 42:24. The great transgression of the Jews after the captivity (when they were cured of idolatry) was a contempt and profanation of the holy things, snuffing at the service of God, bringing the torn and the lame for sacrifice, as if the table of the Lord were a contemptible thing (so we find Mal 1:7, Mal 1:8, etc., and that the priests were guilty of this Mal 2:1, Mal 2:8), and therefore God sent Antiochus to take away the daily sacrifice and cast down the place of his sanctuary. Note, It is just with God to deprive those of the privileges of his house who despise and profane them, and to make those know the worth of ordinances by the want of them who would not know it by the enjoyment of them.

7.He heard the time of this calamity limited and determined, not the time when it should come (that is not here fixed, because God would have his people always prepared for it), but how long it should last, that, when they had no more any prophets to tell them how long (Psa 74:9, which psalm seems to have been calculated for this dark and doleful day), they might have this prophecy to give them a prospect of deliverance in due time. Now concerning this we have here,

(1.)The question asked concerning it, Dan 8:13. Observe [1.] By whom the question was put: I heard one saint speaking to this purport, and then another saint seconded him. "O that we knew how long this trouble will last!" The angels here are called saints, for they are holy ones (Dan 4:13), the holy myriads, Jde 1:14. The angels concern themselves in the affairs of the church, and enquire concerning them, if, as here, concerning its temporal salvations, much more do they desire to look into the great salvation, Pe1 1:12. One saint spoke of the thing, and another enquired concerning it. Thus John, who lay in Christ's bosom, was beckoned to by Peter to ask Christ a question, Joh 13:23, Joh 13:24. [2.] To whom the question was put. He said unto Palmoni that spoke. Some make this certain saint to be a superior angel who understood more than the rest, to whom therefore they came with their enquiries. Others make it to be the eternal Word, the Son of God. He is the unknown One. Palmoni seems to be compounded of Peloni Almoni, which is used (Rut 4:1) for Ho, such a one, and (Kg2 6:8) for such a place. Christ was yet the nameless One. Wherefore asked thou after my name, seeing it is secret? Jdg 13:18. He is the numberer of secrets (as some translate it), for from him there is nothing hidden - the wonderful numberer, so others; his name is called Wonderful. Note, If we would know the mind of God, we must apply to Jesus Christ, who lay in the bosom of the Father, and in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge, not hidden from us, but hidden for us. [3.] The question itself that was asked: "How long shall be the vision concerning the daily sacrifice? How long shall the prohibition of it continue? How long shall the pleasant land be made unpleasant by that severe interdict? How long shall the transgression of desolation (the image of Jupiter), that great transgression which makes all our sacred things desolate, how long shall that stand in the temple? How long shall the sanctuary and the host, the holy place and the holy persons that minister in it, be trodden under foot by the oppressor?" Note, Angels are concerned for the prosperity of the church on earth and desirous to see an end of its desolations. The angels asked, for the satisfaction of Daniel, not doubting but he was desirous to know, how long these calamities should last? The question takes it for granted that they should not last always. The rod of the wicked shall not rest upon the lot of the righteous, though it may come upon their lot. Christ comforted himself in his sufferings with this, The things concerning me have an end (Luk 22:37), and so may the church in hers. But it is desirable to know how long they shall last, that we may provide accordingly.

(2.)The answer given to this question, Dan 8:14. Christ gives instruction to the holy angels, for they are our fellow-servants; but here the answer was given to Daniel, because for his sake the question was asked: He said unto me. God sometimes gives in great favours to his people, in answer to the enquiries and requests of their friends for them. Now,

[1.]Christ assures him that the trouble shall end; it shall continue 2300 days and no longer, so many evenings and mornings (so the word is), so many nuchthēmerai, so many natural days, reckoned, as in the beginning of Genesis, by the evenings and mornings, because it was the evening and the morning sacrifice that they most lamented the loss of, and thought the time passed very slowly while they were deprived of them. Some make the morning and the evening, in this number, to stand for two, and then 2300 evenings and as many mornings will make but 1150 days; and about so many days it was that the daily sacrifice was interrupted: and this comes nearer to the computation (Dan 7:25) of a time, times, and the dividing of a time. But it is less forced to understand them of so many natural days; 2300 days make six years and three months, and about eighteen days; and just so long they reckon from the defection of the people, procured by Menelaus the high priest in the 142nd year of the kingdom of the Seleucidae, the sixth month of that year, and the 6th day of the month (so Josephus dates it), to the cleansing of the sanctuary, and the reestablishment of religion among them, which was in the 148th year, the 9th month, and the 25th day of the month, 1 Macc. 4:52. God reckons the time of his people's afflictions he is afflicted. Rev 2:10, Thou shalt have tribulation ten days.

[2.]He assures him that they shall see better days afterwards: Then shall the sanctuary be cleansed. Note, The cleansing of the sanctuary is a happy token for good to any people; when they begin to be reformed they will soon be relieved. Though the righteous God may, for the correction of his people, suffer his sanctuary to be profaned for a while, yet the jealous God will, for his own glory, see to the cleansing of it in due time. Christ died to cleanse his church, and he will so cleanse it as at length to present it blameless to himself.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Historical Reception

3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

3 quotes · AD 373–458
Post-Nicene
400

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

AD 373Ephrem the SyrianPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON DANIEL 8:8
After the defeat of Darius, Alexander extended the empire of the Greeks in every direction and made it firm with strong garrisons. In the meantime “the great horn was broken,” that is, Alexander died, “and in its place there came up four horns.” Indeed, since Alexander had died without children, he left his divided monarchy to his friends Seleucus, Demetrius, Philip and Ptolemy.
AD 458Theodoret of CyrusPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON DANIEL 8:8
By “four horns” he hints at the four kings who succeeded Alexander at the one time: Ptolemy son of Lagus took control of Egypt; Seleucus Nicanor got possession of Babylon and the other parts bordering on Syria; Antigonus was in charge of Asia; Antipater, Macedonia—or, as some historians think, Philip, who is also called Arrhideus, brother of Alexander.
AD 458Theodoret of CyrusPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON DANIEL 8:8
Despite that great conquest, Alexander met the common fate of humankind.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Daniel 8:8 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.