TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Daniel 5:10–29. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here is, I. The information given to the king, by the queen-mother, concerning Daniel, how fit he was to be consulted in this difficult case. It is supposed that this queen was the widow of Evil-Merodach, and was that famous Nitocris whom Herodotus mentions as a woman of extraordinary prudence. She was not present at the feast, as the king's wives and concubines were (Dan 5:2); it was not agreeable to her age and gravity to keep a merry night. But, tidings of the fright which the king and his lords were put into being brought to her apartment, she came herself to the banqueting-house, to recommend to the king a physician for his melancholy. She entreated him not to be discouraged by the insufficiency of his wise men to solve this riddle, for that there was a man in his kingdom that had more than once helped his grandfather at such a dead lift, and, no doubt, could help him, Dan 5:11, Dan 5:12. She could not undertake to read the writing herself, but directed him to one that could; let Daniel be called now, who should have been called first. Now observe, 1. The high character she gives of Daniel: He is a man in whom is the spirit of the holy gods, who has something in him more than human, not only the spirit of a man, which, in all, is the candle of the Lord, but a divine spirit. According to the language of her country and religion, she could not give a higher encomium of any man; she speaks honourably of him as a man that had, (1.) An admirably good head: Light, and understanding, and wisdom, like the wisdom of the gods, were found in him. Such an insight had he into things secret, and such a foresight of things to come, that it was evident he was divinely inspired; he had knowledge and understanding beyond all the other wise men for interpreting dreams, explaining enigmas or hard sentences, untying knots, and resolving doubts. Solomon had a wonderful sagacity of this kind; but it should seem that in these things Daniel had more of an immediate divine direction. Behold, a greater than Solomon himself is here. Yet what was the wisdom of them both compared with the treasures of wisdom hidden in Christ? (2.) He had an admirably good heart: An excellent spirit was found in him, which was a great ornament to his wisdom and knowledge, and qualified him to receive that gift; for God gives to a man that is good in his sight wisdom, and knowledge, and joy. He was of a humble, holy, heavenly spirit, had a devout and gracious spirit, a spirit of zeal for the glory of God and the good of men. This was indeed an excellent spirit. 2. The account she gives of the respect that Nebuchadnezzar had for him; he was much in his favour, and was preferred by him: "The king thy father" (that is, thy grandfather, but even to many generations Nebuchadnezzar might well be called the father of that royal family, for he it was that raised it to such a pitch of grandeur), "the king, I say, thy father, made him master of the magicians." Perhaps Belshazzar had sometimes, in his pride, spoken slightly of Nebuchadnezzar, and his politics, and the methods of his government, and the ministers he employed, and thought himself wiser than he; and therefore his mother harps upon that. "The king, I say, thy father, to whose good management all thou hast owing, he pronounced him chief of, and gave him dominion over, all the wise men of Babylon, and named him Belteshazzar, according to the name of his god, thinking thereby to put honour upon him;" but Daniel, by constantly making use of his Jewish name himself (which he resolved to keep, in token of his faithful adherence to his religion), had worn out that name; only the queen-dowager remembered it, otherwise he was generally called Daniel. Note, It is a very good office to revive the remembrance of the good services of worthy men, who are themselves modest, and willing that they should be forgotten. 3. The motion she makes concerning him: Let Daniel be called, and he will show the interpretation. By this it appears that Daniel was now forgotten at court. Belshazzar was a stranger to him, knew not that he had such a jewel in his kingdom. With the new king there came in a new ministry, and the old one was laid aside. Note, There are a great many valuable men, and such as might be made very useful, that lie long buried in obscurity, and some that have done eminent services that live to be overlooked and taken no notice of; but, whatever men are, God is not unrighteous to forget the services done to his kingdom. Daniel, being turned out of his place, lived privately, and sought not any opportunity to come into notice again; yet he lived near the court and within call, though Babylon was now besieged, that he might be ready, if there were occasion, to do any good office, by what interest he had among the great ones, for the children of his people. But Providence so ordered it that now, just at the fall of that monarchy, he should by the queen's means be brought to court again, that he might lie there ready for preferment in the ensuing government. Thus do the righteous shine forth out of obscurity, and before honour is humility.
II.The introducing of Daniel to the king, and his request to him to read and expound the writing.
Daniel was brought in before the king, Dan 5:13. He was now nearly ninety years of age, so that his years, and honours, and former preferments, might have entitled him to a free admission into the king's presence; yet he was willing to be conducted in, as a stranger, by the master of the ceremonies. Note,
1.The king asks, with an air of haughtiness: Art thou that Daniel who art of the children of the captivity? Being a Jew, and a captive, he was loth to be beholden to him if he could help it.
2.He tells him what an encomium he had heard of him (Dan 5:14), that the spirit of the gods was in him; and he had sent for him to try whether he deserved so high a character or no.
3.He acknowledges that all the wise men of Babylon were baffled; they could not read this writing, nor show the interpretation, Dan 5:16. But,
4.He promises him the same rewards that he had promised them if he would do it, Dan 5:16. It was strange that the magicians, when now, and in Nebuchadnezzar's time, once and again, they were nonplussed, did not attempt something to save their credit; if they had with a good assurance said, "This is the meaning of such a dream, such a writing," who could disprove them? But God so ordered it that they had nothing at all to say, as, when Christ was born, the heathen oracles were struck dumb.
III.The interpretation which Daniel gave of these mystic characters, which was so far from easing the king of his fears that we may suppose it increased them rather. Daniel was now in years, and Belshazzar was young; and therefore he seems to take a greater liberty of dealing plainly and roundly with him than he had done upon the like occasions with Nebuchadnezzar. In reproving any man, especially great men, there is need of wisdom to consider all circumstances; for they are the reproofs of instruction that are the way of life. In Daniel's discourse here,
1.He undertakes to read the writing which gave them this alarm, and to show them the interpretation of it, Dan 5:17. He slights the offer he made him of rewards, is not pleased that it was mentioned, for he is not one of those that divine for money; what gratuities Nebuchadnezzar gave him afterwards he gladly accepted, but he scorned to bargain for them, or to read the writing to the king for and in consideration of such and such honours promised him. No: "Let thy gifts be to thyself, for they will not be long thine, and give thy fee to another, to any of the wise men whom thou wouldst have most wished to earn it; I value it not." Daniel sees his kingdom now at its last gasp, and therefore looks with contempt upon his gifts and rewards. And thus should we despise all the gifts and rewards that this world can give did we see, as we may by faith, its final period hastening on. Let it give its perishing gifts to another; there are better gifts which we have our eyes and hearts upon; but let us do our duty in the world, do it all the real service we can, read God's writing to it in a profession of religion, and by an agreeable conversation make known the interpretation of it, and then trust God for his gifts, his rewards, in comparison with which all the world can give is mere trash and trifles.
2.He largely recounts to the king God's dealings with his father Nebuchadnezzar, which were intended for instruction and warning to him, Dan 5:18, Dan 5:21. This is not intended for a flourish or an amusement, but is a necessary preliminary to the interpretation of the writing. Note, That we may understand aright what God is doing with us, it is of use to us to review what he has done with others.
(1.)He describes the great dignity and power to which the divine Providence had advanced Nebuchadnezzar, Dan 5:18, Dan 5:19. He had a kingdom, and majesty, and glory, and honour, for aught we know, above what any heathen prince ever had before him; he thought that he got his glory by his own extraordinary conduct and courage, and ascribed his successes to a projecting active genius of his own; but Daniel tells him who now enjoyed what he had laboured for that it was the most high God, the God of gods and Lord of kings (as Nebuchadnezzar himself had called him), that gave him that kingdom, that vast dominion, that majesty wherewith he presided in the affairs of it, and that glory and honour which by his prosperous management he acquired. Note, Whatever degree of outward prosperity any arrive at, they must own that it is of God's giving, not their own getting. Let it never be said, My might, and the power of my hand, have gotten me this wealth, this preferment; but let it always be remembered that it is God that gives men power to get wealth, and gives success to their endeavours. Now the power which God gave to Nebuchadnezzar is here described to be very great in respect both of ability and of authority.
[1.]His ability was so strong that it was irresistible; such was the majesty that God gave him, so numerous were the forces he had at command, and such an admirable dexterity he had at commanding them, that, which way soever his sword turned, it prospered. He could captivate and subdue nations by threatening them, without striking a stroke, for all people trembled and feared before him, and would compound with him for their lives upon any terms. See what force is, and what the fear of it does. It is that by which the brutal part of the world, even of the world of mankind, both governs and is governed.
[2.]His authority was so absolute that it was uncontrollable. The power which was allowed him, which descended upon him, or which, at least, he assumed, was without contradiction, was absolute and despotic, none shared with him either in the legislative or in the executive part of it. In dispensing punishments he condemned or acquitted at pleasure: Whom he would he slew, and whom he would he saved alive, though both were equally innocent or equally guilty. The jus vitae et necis - the power of life and death was entirely in his hand. In dispensing rewards he granted or denied preferment at pleasure: Whom he would he set up, and whom he would he put down, merely for a humour, and without giving a reason so much as to himself; but it is all ex mero motu - of his own good pleasure, and stat pro ratione voluntas - his will stands for a reason. Such was the constitution of the eastern monarchies, such the manner of their kings.
(2.)He sets before him the sins which Nebuchadnezzar had been guilty of, whereby he had provoked God against him. [1.] He behaved insultingly towards those that were under him, and grew tyrannical and oppressive. The description given of his power intimates his abuse of his power, and that he was directed in what he did by humour and passion, not by reason and equity; so that he often condemned the innocent and acquitted the guilty, both which are an abomination to the Lord. He deposed men of merit and preferred unworthy men, to the great detriment of the public, and for this he was accountable to the most high God, that gave him his power. Note, It is a very hard and rare thing for men to have an absolute arbitrary power, and not to make an ill use of it. Camden has a distich of Giraldus, wherein he speaks of it as a rare instance, concerning our king Henry II of England, that never any man had so much power and did so little hurt with it.
Glorior hoc uno, quod nunquam vidimus unum,
Nec potuisse magis, nec nocuisse minus -
Of him I can say, exulting, that with the same power
to do harm no one was ever more inoffensive.
But that was not all. [2.] He behaved insolently towards the God above him, and grew proud and haughty (Dan 5:20): His heart was lifted up, and there his sin and ruin began; his mind was hardened in pride, hardened against the commands of God and his judgments; he was willful and obstinate, and neither the word of God nor his rod made any lasting impression upon him. Note, Pride is a sin that hardens the heart in all other sin and renders the means of repentance and reformation ineffectual.
(3.)He reminds him of the judgments of God that were brought upon him for his pride and obstinacy, how he was deprived of his reason, and so deposed from his kingly throne (Dan 5:20), driven from among men, to dwell with the wild asses, Dan 5:21. He that would not govern his subjects by rules of reason had not reason sufficient for the government himself. Note, Justly does God deprive men of their reason when they become unreasonable and will not use it, and of their power when they become oppressive and use it ill. He continued like a brute till he knew and embraced that first principle of religion, That the most high God rules. And it is rather by religion than reason that man is distinguished from, and dignified above, the beasts; and it is more his honour to be a subject to the supreme Creator than to be lord of the inferior creatures. Note, Kings must know, or shall be made to know, that the most high God rules in their kingdoms (that is an imperium in imperio - an empire within an empire, not to be excepted against), and that he appoints over them whomsoever he will. As he makes heirs, so he makes princes.
3.In God's name, he exhibits articles of impeachment against Belshazzar. Before he reads him his doom, from the hand-writing on the wall, he shows him his crime, that God may be justified when he speaks, and clear when he judges. Now that which he lays to his charge is,
(1.)That he had not taken warning by the judgments of God upon his father (Dan 5:22): Thou his son, O Belshazzar! hast not humbled thy heart, though thou knewest all this. Note, It is a great offence to God if our hearts be not humbled before him to comply both with his precepts and with his providences, humbled by repentance, obedience, and patience; nay, he expects from the greatest of men that their hearts should be humbled before him, by an acknowledgment that, great as they are, to him they are accountable. And it is a great aggravation of the unhumbledness of our hearts when we know enough to humble them but do not consider and improve it, particularly when we know how others have been broken that would not bend, how others have fallen that would not stoop, and yet we continue stiff and inflexible. It makes the sin of children the more heinous if they tread in the steps of their parents' wickedness, though they have seen how dearly it has cost them, and how pernicious the consequences of it have been. Do we know this, do we know all this, and yet are we not humbled?
(2.)That he had affronted God more impudently than Nebuchadnezzar himself had done, witness the revels of this very night, in the midst of which he was seized with this horror (Dan 5:23): "Thou hast lifted up thyself against the Lord of heaven, hast swelled with rage against him, and taken up arms against his crown and dignity, in this particular instance, that thou hast profaned the vessels of his house, and made the utensils of his sanctuary instruments of thy iniquity, and, in an actual designed contempt of him, hast praised the gods of silver and gold, which see not, nor hear, nor know anything, as if they were to be preferred before the God that sees, and hears, and knows every thing." Sinners that are resolved to go on in sin are well enough pleased with gods that neither see, nor hear, nor know, for then they may sin securely; but they will find, to their confusion, that though those are the gods they choose those are not the gods they must be judged by, but one to whom all things are naked and open.
(3.)That he had not answered the end of his creation and maintenance: The God in whose hand thy breath is, and whose are all thy ways, hast thou not glorified. This is a general charge, which stands good against us all; let us consider how we shall answer it. Observe,
[1.]Our dependence upon God as our creator, preserver, benefactor, owner, and ruler; not only from his hand our breath was at first, but in his hand our breath is still; it is he that holds our souls in life, and, if he take away our breath, we die. Our times being in his hand, so is our breath, by which our times are measured. In him we live, and move, and have our being; we live by him, live upon him, and cannot live without him. The way of man is not in himself, not at his own command, at his own disposal, but his are all our ways; for our hearts are in his hand, and so are the hearts of all men, even of kings, who seem to act most as free-agents.
[2.]Our duty to God, in consideration of this dependence; we ought to glorify him, to devote ourselves to his honour and employ ourselves in his service, to make it our care to please him and our business to praise him.
[3.]Our default in this duty, notwithstanding that dependence; we have not done it; for we have all sinned, and come short of the glory of God. This is the indictment against Belshazzar; there needs no proof, it is made good by the notorious evidence of the fact, and his own conscience cannot but plead guilty to it. And therefore,
4.He now proceeds to read the sentence, as he found it written upon the wall: "Then" (says Daniel) "when thou hast come to such a height of impiety as thus to trample upon the most sacred things, then when thou wast in the midst of thy sacrilegious idolatrous feast, then was the part of the hand, the writing fingers, sent from him, from that God whom thou didst so daringly affront, and who had borne so long with thee, but would bear no longer; he sent them, and this writing, thou now seest, was written, Dan 5:24. It is he that now writes bitter things against thee, and makes thee to possess thy iniquities," Job 13:26. Note, As the sin of sinners is written in the book of God's omniscience, so the doom of sinners is written in the book of God's law; and the day is coming when those books shall be opened, and they shall be judged by them. Now the writing was, Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin, Dan 5:25. It is well that we have an authentic exposition of these words annexed, else we could make little of them, so concise are they; the signification of them is, He has numbered, he has weighed, and they divide. The Chaldean wise men, because they knew not that there is but one God only, could not understand who this He should be, and for that reason (some think) the writing puzzled them. (1.) Mene; that is repeated, for the thing is certain - Mene, mene; that signifies, both in Hebrew and Chaldee, He has numbered and finished, which Daniel explains thus (Dan 5:26): "God has numbered thy kingdom, the years and days of the continuance of it; these were numbered in the counsel of God, and now they are finished; the term has expired for and during which thou wast to hold it, and now it must be surrendered. Here is an end of thy kingdom." (2.) Tekel; that signifies, in Chaldee, Thou art weighed, and, in Hebrew, Thou art too light. So Dr. Lightfoot. For this king and his actions are weighed in the just and unerring balances of divine equity. God does as perfectly know his true character as the goldsmith knows the weight of that which he has weighed in the nicest scales. God does not give judgment against him till he has first pondered his actions, and considered the merits of his case. "But thou art found wanting, unworthy to have such a trust lodged in thee, a vain, light, empty man, a man of no weight or consideration." (3.) Upharsin, which should be rendered, and Pharsin, or Peres. Parsin, in Hebrew, signifies the Persians; Paresin, in Chaldee, signifies dividing; Daniel puts both together (Dan 5:28): "Thy kingdom is divided, is rent from thee, and given to the Medes and Persians, as a prey to be divided among them." Now this may, without any force, be applied to the doom of sinners. Mene, Tekel, Peres, may easily be made to signify death, judgment, and hell. At death, the sinner's days are numbered and finished; after death the judgment, when he will be weighed in the balance and found wanting; and after judgment the sinner will be cut asunder, and given as a prey to the devil and his angels. Daniel does not here give Belshazzar such advice and encouragement to repent as he had given Nebuchadnezzar, because he saw the decree had gone forth and he would not be allowed any space to repent.
One would have thought that Belshazzar would be exasperated against Daniel, and, seeing his own case desperate, would be in a rage against him. But he was so far convicted by his own conscience of the reasonableness of all he said that he objected nothing against it; but, on the contrary, gave Daniel the reward he promised him, put on him the scarlet gown and the gold chain, and proclaimed him the third ruler in the kingdom (Dan 5:29), because he would be as good as his word, and because it was not Daniel's fault if the exposition of the hand-writing was not such as he desired. Note, Many show great respect to God's prophets who yet have no regard to his word. Daniel did not value these titles and ensigns of honour, yet would not refuse them, because they were tokens of his prince's good-will: but we have reason to think that he received them with a smile, foreseeing how soon they would all wither with him that bestowed them. They were like Jonah's gourd, which came up in a night and perished in a night, and therefore it was folly for him to be exceedingly glad of them.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Why then, you ask, being so humble did Daniel not repel either the adoration that was paid him by the king or the offerings? This I will not say, for it is sufficient for me simply to mention the question, and the rest I leave to you, that at least in this way I may stir up your thoughts.… For that [Daniel] did not do this out of arrogance is evident from his saying, “your gifts be to yourself.”
Verse 17. "To this Daniel made answer before the king, saying: 'Thy gifts be unto thyself, and bestow the presents of thy house upon someone else...'" We should follow the example of a man like Daniel, who despised the honor and gifts of a king, and who without any reward even in that early day followed the Gospel injunction: "Freely have ye received, freely give." (Matthew 10:8) And besides, when one is announcing sad tidings, it is unbecoming for him willingly to accept gifts.
Continue studying Daniel 5:17 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Daniel 5:17 captures a pivotal moment where the prophet Daniel, summoned to interpret the mysterious handwriting on the wall for King Belshazzar, boldly rejects the king's lavish offers of gifts and rewards. This act profoundly underscores Daniel's unwavering integrity and his singular commitment to serving God alone, demonstrating that his motivation for delivering divine truth transcends any earthly gain or personal ambition, thereby setting the stage for a powerful and uncompromised message of divine judgment.
Context
Literary Context
Daniel 5:17 is situated at the dramatic climax of King Belshazzar's sacrilegious feast. The narrative immediately preceding this verse details the king's blasphemous act of drinking from the sacred vessels plundered from the Jerusalem temple, an act of profound contempt for the God of Israel. This sacrilege is immediately followed by the terrifying appearance of a disembodied hand writing a cryptic message on the palace wall, plunging the king and his court into abject terror, as described in Daniel 5:1-5. Overwhelmed with fear and unable to find anyone among his wise men capable of reading or interpreting the message, Belshazzar's queen mother recommends Daniel, highlighting his extraordinary wisdom and the "spirit of the holy gods" within him, as detailed in Daniel 5:10-12. The king, desperate for understanding, reiterates his extravagant offer of purple robes, a gold chain, and the position of third ruler in the kingdom to Daniel in Daniel 5:16. Daniel's response in verse 17 directly addresses this enticing offer, asserting his independence and purity of motive before delivering God's severe and unvarnished judgment.
Historical & Cultural Context
The events of Daniel 5 unfold during the final, tumultuous hours of the Neo-Babylonian Empire, specifically on the fateful night Babylon fell to the Medes and Persians in 539 BC. King Belshazzar, acting as co-regent with his father Nabonidus, embodies the hubris, decadence, and spiritual blindness of a declining empire. The use of sacred vessels from the Jerusalem temple, plundered by Nebuchadnezzar decades earlier (as recounted in 2 Kings 25:13-17), was not merely an act of revelry but a deliberate and provocative act of contempt against the God of Israel, a direct challenge to divine authority. In ancient Near Eastern courts, it was a deeply ingrained custom for kings to bestow lavish gifts, high honors, and prominent positions upon those who could successfully interpret dreams, omens, or solve difficult riddles, a practice exemplified by Pharaoh's promotion of Joseph in Genesis 41:39-43. Daniel's unequivocal refusal of these customary and highly coveted rewards would have been a profoundly counter-cultural and audacious statement, emphasizing his allegiance to a higher, divine power that utterly transcended any earthly monarch.
Key Themes
Daniel 5:17 powerfully contributes to several overarching themes woven throughout the book of Daniel. Firstly, it highlights Integrity and Disinterest in Worldly Gain. Daniel's immediate and unequivocal rejection of the king's material incentives underscores his profound moral and spiritual integrity. His motivation is clearly not personal enrichment or political advancement, but rather faithful obedience to God and the uncompromised delivery of divine truth. This contrasts sharply with the corrupt and self-serving nature of the Babylonian court, which often operated on bribery and flattery. Secondly, the verse emphasizes Divine Authority Over Human Power. By declining the king's gifts, Daniel subtly but powerfully asserts the supremacy of God's message and authority over Belshazzar's earthly dominion. His focus remains solely on being God's messenger, not on gaining favor from a human monarch, thereby setting the stage for the humbling declaration of God's sovereignty over earthly kingdoms, a theme consistently reinforced throughout Daniel, notably in Daniel 2:21. Finally, Daniel's actions exemplify Faithful Prophetic Obedience. Despite rejecting the rewards, Daniel unequivocally commits to reading and interpreting the writing. This demonstrates his unwavering dedication to his role as a prophet, delivering potentially unwelcome truth without personal agenda or compromise, embodying the prophetic call to speak God's word regardless of personal cost or consequence, as seen in the call of Jeremiah in Jeremiah 1:7-8.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This Aramaic term (H4978) refers to "a present" or, specifically in a negative sense, "a bribe." Daniel's rejection of these "gifts" signifies his refusal to be influenced or bought by the king's material offerings. It underscores that his prophetic service is not for personal gain but is freely given out of obedience to God, thus preserving the purity and uncompromised authority of the divine message he is about to deliver.
This word (H5023) denotes "a largess" or "a reward." Similar to "gifts," Daniel's rejection of these "rewards" further emphasizes his profound detachment from worldly compensation. He is not motivated by the king's promised riches or status, reinforcing his spiritual independence and the fact that his ultimate reward comes from God alone, not from human accolades or positions.
This Aramaic conjunction (H1297), meaning "but," "nevertheless," or "however," serves as a strong adversative. It creates a powerful contrast between Daniel's principled refusal of the king's inducements and his unwavering commitment to perform the requested service. It highlights his principled stance: he will not be bought, but he will still fulfill his divine mandate to speak truth, demonstrating his courage, faithfulness, and the non-negotiable nature of God's word.
Verse Breakdown
"Then Daniel answered and said before the king"
This opening clause establishes Daniel's direct, formal, and authoritative engagement with King Belshazzar. It signifies a moment of courageous confrontation and conviction, as Daniel, a captive and a prophet of God, stands unflinchingly before a powerful, yet terrified and spiritually blind, monarch.
"Let thy gifts be to thyself, and give thy rewards to another"
This is Daniel's unequivocal and bold rejection of the king's lavish offers of material gain and political advancement. It is a profound declaration of disinterest in worldly profit, immediately setting Daniel apart from the king's other advisors and asserting his moral and spiritual independence from the corrupting influence of the Babylonian court.
"yet I will read the writing unto the king, and make known to him the interpretation"
Despite his rejection of the material incentives, Daniel affirms his unwavering commitment to the task at hand. The emphatic "yet" (Aramaic bᵉram) highlights the stark contrast: his service is not contingent upon earthly reward. He will fulfill his divine calling to reveal the truth, demonstrating his unwavering faithfulness to God and the spiritual, rather than mercenary, nature of his mission.
Literary Devices
Daniel 5:17 employs several potent literary devices that amplify its message. The most prominent is Contrast, as Daniel sharply contrasts his rejection of the king's earthly "gifts" and "rewards" with his unwavering commitment to deliver the divine "interpretation." This highlights his spiritual integrity against the backdrop of Belshazzar's worldly decadence and moral bankruptcy. There is also a strong element of Irony present; the king, in his desperation, offers immense wealth and power for an interpretation that will ultimately pronounce his kingdom's doom and his own demise. Daniel's refusal of these benefits, yet his willingness to speak the unvarnished truth, subtly Foreshadows the impending judgment and the king's ultimate downfall, demonstrating that divine truth cannot be bought or silenced by human power or wealth. Furthermore, Daniel's bold declaration functions as a powerful Statement of Principle, establishing his moral and spiritual authority and the absolute supremacy of God's word before he delivers the weighty and terrifying message from the Almighty.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Daniel's principled stand in Daniel 5:17 resonates deeply with the biblical emphasis on integrity, selfless service, and the pursuit of divine truth over worldly gain. His refusal of the king's gifts is not merely an act of humility but a powerful theological statement: true prophetic ministry cannot be bought, influenced, or compromised by human incentives. It underscores that God's messengers are primarily accountable to Him, and their motivation must be pure, reflecting the unblemished nature of the divine word they bear. This commitment to truth, even when it means rejecting personal benefit, is a hallmark of genuine faith and a testament to the sovereignty of God, who alone provides true and lasting reward. It teaches that the value of God's word is immeasurable and cannot be equated with or diminished by earthly treasures.
Reflection and Application
Daniel's response to King Belshazzar in Daniel 5:17 serves as a profound and enduring challenge for believers today, prompting us to critically examine the motivations behind our service, our ambitions, and our pursuit of truth. In a world that often measures success by material gain, public recognition, or political power, Daniel's unwavering integrity calls us to a higher standard. Are we driven by a desire for personal enrichment, social status, or human applause when we engage in ministry, professional life, or even personal relationships? Or is our primary motivation a pure desire to faithfully serve God, declare His truth, and live in accordance with His will, regardless of earthly incentives or potential consequences? Daniel's example reminds us that our most valuable and lasting reward comes not from human accolades or fleeting riches, but from God Himself, whose approval is eternal and whose kingdom enduring forever. Like Daniel, we are called to be faithful stewards of the truth, speaking it boldly and without compromise, even when it might be unpopular, costly, or when tempting earthly incentives are offered. This commitment to truth and integrity, prioritizing God's kingdom above all else, is a hallmark of genuine discipleship and a powerful witness to a watching world that desperately needs to see authentic faith.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did Daniel refuse the king's gifts and rewards?
Daniel's refusal stemmed from his profound integrity and his unwavering commitment to God's authority over earthly power. He did not want his interpretation of the divine message to be perceived as bought, influenced, or compromised by personal gain. By rejecting the king's lavish offers, Daniel asserted that his service was to a higher King—the God of heaven—and that divine truth could not be purchased or manipulated by human wealth or status. His focus was solely on delivering God's unvarnished truth, especially to a king who had just profaned sacred vessels from God's temple. This act underscored his prophetic purity and spiritual independence, ensuring that the message would be understood as coming directly from God, not from a mercenary prophet.
Was Daniel being disrespectful to King Belshazzar by refusing his offers?
While seemingly blunt, Daniel's refusal was not an act of disrespect that defied the king's authority to offer gifts. Instead, it was a profound statement of Daniel's moral and spiritual independence. He was asserting that his allegiance and service were to God alone, and thus his prophetic word could not be influenced or bought by an earthly monarch, particularly one who had shown such contempt for God. Daniel's willingness to still interpret the writing, as stated in the latter part of Daniel 5:17, demonstrated his respect for the king's desperate need for truth, even as he rejected the terms of the reward. His actions ultimately served to magnify God's sovereignty over the king's fleeting power, delivering a message that was for the king's ultimate spiritual benefit, however painful.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Daniel's selfless refusal of earthly rewards and his unwavering commitment to delivering God's truth prefigure the perfect ministry of Jesus Christ. Like Daniel, Jesus operated with absolute integrity, never seeking personal gain, worldly recognition, or political power, even when offered the kingdoms of the world and their glory during His temptation in the wilderness, as recorded in Matthew 4:8-10. His entire life and ministry were characterized by a singular devotion to fulfilling the Father's will and proclaiming the Kingdom of God, often at great personal cost, declaring, "My food is to do the will of Him who sent Me, and to finish His work" (John 4:34). Jesus, the ultimate Prophet and King, did not come to be served or to accumulate earthly riches, but to serve and to give His life as a ransom for many (Mark 10:45). Daniel's detachment from worldly incentives foreshadows Christ's teaching that His Kingdom is "not of this world" (John 18:36), and His call for His followers to store up treasures in heaven rather than on earth (Matthew 6:19-21). Ultimately, Daniel's integrity points to the Lamb of God, who, without blemish or personal agenda, offered Himself as the pure and unbought sacrifice for the sins of the world, redeeming us "not with perishable things like silver or gold, but with the precious blood of Christ, a lamb without blemish or spot" (1 Peter 1:18-19).