TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Acts 10:44–48. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
We have here the issue and effect of Peter's sermon to Cornelius and his friends. He did not labour in vain among them, but they were all brought home to Christ. Here we have,
I.God's owning Peter's word, by conferring the Holy Ghost upon the hearers of it, and immediately upon the hearing of it (Act 10:44):
While Peter was yet speaking these words, and perhaps designed to say more, he was happily superseded by visible indications that the Holy Ghost, even in his miraculous gifts and powers, fell on all those who heard the word, even as he did on the apostles at first; so Peter saith, Act 11:15. Therefore some think it was with a rushing mighty wind, and in cloven tongues, as that was. Observe,
1.When the Holy Ghost fell upon them - while Peter was preaching. Thus God bore witness to what he said, and accompanied it with a divine power. Thus were the signs of an apostle wrought among them, Co2 12:12. Though Peter could not give the Holy Ghost, yet the Holy Ghost being given along with the word of Peter, by this it appeared he was sent of God. The Holy Ghost fell upon others after they were baptized, for their confirmation; but upon these Gentiles before they were baptized: as Abraham was justified by faith, being yet in uncircumcision, to show that God is not tied to a method, nor confines himself to external signs. The Holy Ghost fell upon those that were neither circumcised nor baptized; for it is the Spirit that quickeneth, the flesh profiteth nothing.
2.How it appeared that the Holy Ghost had fallen upon them (Act 10:46): They spoke with tongues which they never learned, perhaps the Hebrew, the holy tongue; as the preachers were enabled to speak the vulgar tongues, that they might communicate the doctrine of Christ to the hearers, so, probably, the hearers were immediately taught the sacred tongue, that they might examine the proofs which the preachers produced out of the Old Testament in the original. Or their being enabled to speak with tongues intimated that they were all designed for ministers, and by this first descent of the Spirit upon them were qualified to preach the gospel to others, which they did but now receive themselves. But, observe, when they spoke with tongues, they magnified God, they spoke of Christ and the benefits of redemption, which Peter had been preaching to the glory of God. Thus did they on whom the Holy Ghost first descended, Act 2:11. Note, Whatever gift we are endued with, we ought to honour God with it, and particularly the gift of speaking, and all the improvements of it.
3.What impression it made upon the believing Jews that were present (Act 10:45): Those of the circumcision who believed were astonished - those six that came along with Peter; it surprised them exceedingly, and perhaps gave them some uneasiness, because upon the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost, which they thought had been appropriated to their own nation. Had they understood the scriptures of the Old Testament, which pointed at this, it would not have been such an astonishment to them; but by our mistaken notions of things we create difficulties to ourselves in the methods of divine providence and grace.
II.Peter's owning God's work in baptizing those on whom the Holy Ghost fell. Observe,
1.Though they had received the Holy Ghost, yet it was requisite they should be baptized; though God is not tied to instituted ordinances, we are; and no extraordinary gifts set us above them, but rather oblige us so much the more to conform to them. Some in our days would have argued "These are baptized with the Holy Ghost and therefore what need have they to be baptized with water? It is below them." No; it is not below them, while water-baptism is an ordinance of Christ, and the door of admission into the visible church, and a seal of the new covenant.
2.Though they were Gentiles, yet, having received the Holy Ghost, they might be admitted to baptism (Act 10:47): Can any man, though ever so rigid a Jew, forbid water, that these should not be baptized, who have received the Holy Ghost as well as we? The argument is conclusive; can we deny the sign to those who have received the thing signified? Are not those on whom God has bestowed the grace of the covenant plainly entitled to the seals of the covenant? Surely those that have received the Spirit as well as we ought to receive baptism as well as we; for it becomes us to follow God's indications, and to take those into communion with us whom he hath taken into communion with himself. God hath promised to pour his Spirit upon the seed of the faithful, upon their offspring; and who then can forbid water, that they should not be baptized, who have received the promise of the Holy Ghost as well as we? Now it appears why the Spirit was given them before they were baptized - because otherwise Peter could not have persuaded himself to baptize them, any more than to have preached to them, if he had not been ordered to do it by a vision; at least he could not have avoided the censure of those of the circumcision that believed. Thus is there one unusual step of divine grace taken after another to bring the Gentiles into the church. How well is it for us that the grace of a good God is so much more extensive than the charity of some good men!
3.Peter did not baptize them himself, but commanded them to be baptized, Act 10:48. It is probable that some of the brethren who came with him did it by his order, and that he declined it for the same reason that Paul did - lest those that were baptized by him should think the better of themselves for it, or he should seem to have baptized in his own name, Co1 1:15. the apostles received the commission to go and disciple all nations by baptism. But is was to prayer and the ministry of the word that they were to give themselves. And Paul says that he was sent, not to baptize but to preach, which was the more noble and excellent work. The business of baptizing was therefore ordinarily devolved upon the inferior ministers; these acted by the orders of the apostles, who might therefore be said to do it. Qui per alterum facit, per seipsum facere dicitur - What a man does by another, he may be said to do by himself.
III.Their owning both Peter's word and God's work in their desire for further advantage by Peter's ministry:
They prayed him to tarry certain days. They could not press him to reside constantly among them - they knew that he had work to do in other places, and that for the present he was expected at Jerusalem; yet they were not willing he should go away immediately, but earnestly begged he would stay for some time among them, that they might be further instructed by him in the things pertaining to the kingdom of God. Note,
1.Those who have some acquaintance with Christ cannot but covet more.
2.Even those that have received the Holy Ghost must see their need of the ministry of the word.
Historical interpretation
Two Centuries of Reception
6 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
And therefore did he exclaim, "Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, who have received the Holy Spirit as well as we? "
Through these words he shows that he would have never gone to them if he had not been ordered to do so. Likewise, he would have never baptized them so unscrupulously if he had not heard them prophesy when the Holy Spirit rested on them. And that is why he said, “Can anyone forbid water that these, who have received the Holy Spirit as well as we, should not be baptized?” He wanted to show and teach those who were with him that if the Holy Spirit had not come to rest upon them, there would have been someone who would have kept them from baptism.
We have thought it necessary for the arranging of certain matters, dearest brother, and for their investigation by the examination of a common council, to gather together and to hold a council, at which many priests were assembled at once; at which, moreover, many things were brought forward and transacted. But the subject in regard to which we had chiefly to write to you, and to confer with your gravity and wisdom, is one that more especially pertains both to the priestly authority and to the unity, as well as the dignity, of the Catholic Church, arising as these do from the ordination of the divine appointment; to wit, that those who have been dipped abroad outside the Church, and have been stained among heretics and schismatics with the taint of profane water, when they come to us and to the Church which is one, ought to be baptized, for the reason that it is a small matter to "lay hands on them that they may receive the Holy Ghost," unless they receive also the baptism of the Church. For then finally can they be fully sanctified, and be the sons of God, if they be born of each sacrament; since it is written, "Except a man be born again of water, and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God." For we find also, in the Acts of the Apostles, that this is maintained by the apostles, and kept in the truth of the saving faith, so that when, in the house of Cornelius the centurion, the Holy Ghost had descended upon the Gentiles who were there, fervent in the warmth of their faith, and believing in the Lord with their whole heart; and when, filled with the Spirit, they blessed God in divers tongues, still none the less the blessed Apostle Peter, mindful of the divine precept and the Gospel, commanded that those same men should be baptized who had already been filled with the Holy Spirit, that nothing might seem to be neglected to the observance by the apostolic instruction in all things of the law of the divine precept and Gospel. But that that is not baptism which the heretics use; and that none of those who oppose Christ can profit by the grace of Christ; has lately been set forth with care in the letter which was written on that subject to Quintus, our colleague, established in Mauritania; as also in a letter which our colleagues previously wrote to our fellow-bishops presiding in Numidia, of both which letters I have subjoined copies.
For since a person is of twofold nature, soul and body, the purification also is twofold, the one incorporeal for the incorporeal part, and the other bodily for the body. The water cleanses the body, and the Spirit seals the soul, that we may draw near to God, “having our heart sprinkled” by the Spirit “and our body washed with pure water.” … Neither does he who is baptized with water, but not found worthy of the Spirit, receive the grace in perfection; nor if a person is virtuous in his deeds, but receives not the seal by water, shall he enter into the kingdom of heaven. A bold saying, but not mine, for it is Jesus who has declared it, and here is the proof of the statement from holy Scripture. Cornelius was a just man who was honored with a vision of angels and had set up his prayers and alms deeds as a good memorial before God in heaven. Peter came, and the Spirit was poured out on them that believed, and they spoke with other tongues and prophesied. And after the grace of the Spirit the Scripture says that Peter commanded them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ; in order that, the soul having been born again by faith, the body also might by the water partake of the grace.
That the need of water is absolute and indispensable, you may learn in this way. On one occasion, when the Spirit had been poured out before the water was applied, the apostle did not stay at this point, but, as though the water were necessary and not superfluous, observe what he says: “Can any one forbid water for baptizing these people who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?”
Peter seizes his advantage, and see the plea he makes of it. "Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?" Mark the issue to which he brings it; how he has been travailing to bring this forth. So entirely was he of this mind! "Can any one," he asks, "forbid water?" It is the language, we may almost say, of one triumphantly pressing his advantage against such as would forbid, such as should say that this ought not to be. The whole thing, he says, is complete, the most essential part of the business, the baptism with which we were baptized.
Continue studying Acts 10:47 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Acts 10:47 captures a pivotal moment in the early Christian church, marking a significant step in the inclusion of Gentiles into the body of believers. Peter, observing the miraculous outpouring of the Holy Spirit on Cornelius's household, poses a rhetorical question that challenges the traditional Jewish understanding of salvation and membership in God's covenant people, affirming God's universal acceptance of all who believe, regardless of ethnic background or prior religious standing.
Context
Literary Context
The preceding verses detail the astonishing event where the Holy Spirit falls upon Cornelius and his household while Peter is still preaching (Acts 10:44-46). This spontaneous outpouring, evidenced by speaking in tongues and glorifying God, mirrors the Pentecost experience of the Jewish believers (Acts 2:1-4). Peter's question in verse 47 directly addresses the implications of this undeniable divine act, making it impossible for any Jewish believer present to object to the Gentiles' water baptism, thus paving the way for the subsequent command to baptize them (Acts 10:48). This moment transitions the narrative from the initial Jewish focus of the early church to its expansion to the Gentiles, setting the stage for Paul's later missionary journeys.
Historical & Cultural Context
First-century Judaism was characterized by a strong sense of ethnic and religious distinctiveness, with strict adherence to Mosaic Law, including dietary laws and circumcision, which served as markers of covenant identity. Gentiles were considered "unclean" and outside the covenant people of Israel, requiring conversion to Judaism (including circumcision) to be fully accepted. Peter, as a devout Jew, initially shared these cultural biases, as evidenced by his vision in Acts 10:9-16. The events at Cornelius's house, therefore, represented a profound cultural and theological paradigm shift, challenging centuries of tradition and demonstrating God's radical inclusivity that transcended the established social and religious boundaries between Jew and Gentile.
Key Themes
This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in Acts. Firstly, it highlights the Sovereignty and Initiative of the Holy Spirit, demonstrating that God, through His Spirit, determines who is part of His covenant, not human tradition or prerequisite rituals. The Spirit's descent before water baptism underscores His primary role in salvation and inclusion. Secondly, it champions the Inclusivity and Universality of the Gospel, breaking down the "dividing wall of hostility" between Jew and Gentile (Ephesians 2:14). This event confirms that salvation and the blessings of the new covenant are available to all who believe, regardless of ethnic background or social status, fulfilling the promise to Abraham that "all peoples on earth will be blessed through you" (Genesis 12:3). Finally, it underscores the Subordination of Ritual to Spiritual Reality, showing that while water baptism is an important act of obedience, it is a response to, rather than a prerequisite for, the reception of the Holy Spirit and divine acceptance.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
From the base of kolazō, meaning "to estop, i.e., prevent (by word or act)." In this context, Peter is asking if anyone has the authority or justification to prevent these Gentiles from receiving water baptism, given God's clear prior approval through the Holy Spirit. It implies a challenge to human authority attempting to override divine action.
A prolonged form of a primary verb, meaning "to take (in very many applications, literally and figuratively, properly objective or active, to get hold of)." This word emphasizes the active reception of the Holy Spirit by Cornelius's household, indicating a genuine, undeniable, and divinely initiated experience, not merely a passive observation.
A combination of kathos ("just as") and kai ("and, also, even"). This phrase is crucial, drawing a direct parallel between the experience of Cornelius's household and that of the Jewish believers at Pentecost. It asserts an identical, undeniable spiritual reality, making any distinction based on ethnicity or prior religious status null and void for the purpose of full inclusion.
Verse Breakdown
"Can any man forbid water"
Peter poses a rhetorical question, challenging anyone present to offer a legitimate reason to deny water baptism. The "water" refers to the medium for baptism, symbolizing the outward rite of initiation into the Christian community. The implied answer is a resounding "no," as no human authority can contradict God's clear action.
"that these should not be baptized"
This clause specifies the action being considered: the administration of water baptism. "These" refers directly to Cornelius and his household, the Gentiles who have just experienced the Holy Spirit's outpouring. The question highlights the absurdity of denying an outward sign to those who have already received the inward reality.
"which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?"
This is the foundational premise of Peter's argument. The reception of the Holy Spirit by the Gentiles, manifested in ways identical to the Jewish believers' experience at Pentecost, is presented as irrefutable evidence of God's acceptance. The phrase "as well as we" powerfully equates their spiritual standing with that of the apostles and other Jewish Christians, making any further distinction untenable.
Literary Devices
The verse employs Rhetorical Question as its primary literary device. Peter's question, "Can any man forbid water...?", is not seeking information but rather making a forceful assertion. It challenges the listeners to consider the undeniable evidence of God's work and to recognize the logical conclusion: if God has accepted them by giving them the Holy Spirit, who are humans to object to their baptism? This device effectively silences potential opposition and compels agreement. Furthermore, there is an element of Juxtaposition between human tradition (which would forbid Gentile inclusion without prior conversion to Judaism) and divine action (the outpouring of the Holy Spirit on uncircumcised Gentiles). The verse also uses Analogy by drawing a direct parallel between the Gentile experience and the Jewish believers' experience ("as well as we"), thereby legitimizing the Gentiles' spiritual status.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Acts 10:47 marks a pivotal moment in redemptive history, signifying the formal opening of the church to the Gentiles without requiring adherence to Mosaic Law, specifically circumcision. This event underscores the core New Testament truth that salvation is by grace through faith, not by works of the law or ethnic lineage (Ephesians 2:8-9). The Holy Spirit's descent on Cornelius's household before their water baptism powerfully demonstrates that spiritual regeneration and divine acceptance precede and validate outward rites. It reveals God's unreserved desire to include all humanity in His new covenant, breaking down the ancient barriers between Jew and Gentile and establishing the church as a truly global, multi-ethnic body united in Christ.
Reflection and Application
Acts 10:47 serves as a profound reminder that God's grace and redemptive plan extend far beyond human-made boundaries, traditions, or prejudices. It challenges believers today to examine their own biases and to embrace God's radical inclusivity, recognizing that the Holy Spirit works in diverse ways and among all peoples. Just as Peter had to overcome deeply ingrained cultural and religious norms, we are called to be flexible, open-minded, and obedient to the Spirit's leading, even when it pushes us out of our comfort zones or challenges our preconceived notions of who is "worthy" or "acceptable" to God. This verse compels us to celebrate the universal reach of the Gospel and to actively participate in welcoming all whom God has called into His family, ensuring that no human barrier hinders divine acceptance or the outward expression of faith through baptism.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What is the significance of the Holy Spirit falling on the Gentiles before their water baptism?
The timing of the Holy Spirit's outpouring in Acts 10:44-46 is profoundly significant. It demonstrates that the reception of the Holy Spirit—the spiritual baptism—is God's sovereign act of salvation and inclusion, not contingent upon human rituals or ethnic background. This event unequivocally validated the Gentiles' new spiritual status in God's eyes, making it clear that they were fully accepted members of the new covenant community before any outward rite. Water baptism then became a public declaration and an act of obedience to Christ's command (Matthew 28:19), rather than a prerequisite for salvation or for receiving the Spirit. It underscores that the Holy Spirit is the true seal of God's covenant, and human actions or traditions cannot negate divine approval.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Acts 10:47, while focusing on the inclusion of Gentiles, ultimately finds its Christ-centered fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. It is through His atoning sacrifice on the cross that the "dividing wall of hostility" between Jew and Gentile was broken down (Ephesians 2:14-16). Jesus is the ultimate "Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world" (John 1:29), making salvation accessible to all who believe, regardless of their background. The Holy Spirit, whose outpouring is central to Acts 10:47, is the Spirit of Christ (Romans 8:9), poured out by the ascended Lord as a sign of the new covenant and a down payment of our inheritance (Ephesians 1:13-14). Thus, the inclusion of Gentiles, validated by the Spirit's presence, is a direct consequence of Christ's finished work, demonstrating that in Him, there is "neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus" (Galatians 3:28). This verse, therefore, is a powerful testament to the universal scope of Christ's redemption, inviting all people into the family of God through faith in Him.