TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Acts 10:9–18. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Cornelius had received positive orders from heaven to send for Peter, whom otherwise he had not heard of, or at least not heeded; but here is another difficulty that lies in the way of bringing them together - the question is whether Peter will come to Cornelius when he is sent for; not as if he thought it below him to come at a beck, or as if he were afraid to preach his doctrine to a polite man as Cornelius was: but it sticks at a point of conscience. Cornelius is a very worthy man, and has many good qualities, but he is a Gentile, he is not circumcised; and, because God in his law had forbidden his people to associate with idolatrous nations, they would not keep company with any but those of their own religion, though they were ever so deserving, and they carried the matter so far that they made even the involuntary touch of a Gentile to contract a ceremonial pollution, Joh 18:28. Peter had not got over this stingy bigoted notion of his countrymen, and therefore will be shy of coming to Cornelius. Now, to remove this difficulty, he has a vision here, to prepare him to receive the message sent him by Cornelius, as Ananias had to prepare him to go to Paul. The scriptures of the Old Testament had spoken plainly of the bringing in of the Gentiles into the church. Christ had given plain intimations of it when he ordered them to teach all nations; and yet even Peter himself, who knew so much of his Master's mind, could not understand it, till it was here revealed by vision, that the Gentiles should be fellow-heirs, Eph 3:6. Now here observe,
I.The circumstances of this vision.
1.It was when the messengers sent from Cornelius were now nigh the city, Act 10:9. Peter knew nothing of their approach, and they knew nothing of his praying; but he that knew both him and them was preparing things for the interview, and facilitating the end of their negotiation. To all God's purposes there is a time, a proper time; and he is pleased often to bring things to the minds of his ministers, which they had not thought of, just then when they have occasion to use them.
2.It was when Peter went up upon the house-top to pray, about noon.
(1.)Peter was much in prayer, much in secret prayer, though he had a great deal of public work upon his hands.
(2.)He prayed about the sixth hour, according to David's example, who, not only morning and evening, but at noon, addressed himself to God by prayer, Psa 55:17. From morning to night we should think to be too long to be without meat; yet who thinks it is too long to be without prayer?
(3.)He prayed upon the house-top; thither he retired for privacy, where he could neither hear nor be heard, and so might avoid both distraction and ostentation. There, upon the roof of the house, he had a full view of the heavens, which might assist his pious adoration of the God he prayed to; and there he had also a full view of the city and country, which might assist his pious compassion of the people he prayed for.
(4.)He had this vision immediately after he had prayed, as an answer to his prayer for the spreading of the gospel, and because the ascent of the heart to God in prayer is an excellent preparative to receive the discoveries of the divine grace and favour.
3.It was when he became very hungry, and was waiting for his dinner (Act 10:10); probably he had not that day eaten before, though doubtless he had prayed before; and now he would have eaten, ēthele geusasthai - he would have tasted, which intimates his great moderation and temperance in eating. When he was very hungry, yet he would be content with a little, with a taste, and would not fly upon the spoil. Now this hunger was a proper inlet to the vision about meats, as Christ's hunger in the wilderness was to Satan's temptation to turn stones into bread.
II.The vision itself, which was not so plain as that to Cornelius, but more figurative and enigmatical, to make the deeper impression.
1.He fell into a trance or ecstasy, not of terror, but of contemplation, with which he was so entirely swallowed up as not only not to be regardful, but not to be sensible, of external things. He quite lost himself to this world, and so had his mind entirely free for converse with divine things; as Adam in innocency, when the deep sleep fell upon him. The more clear we get of the world, the more near we get to heaven: whether Peter was now in the body or out of the body he could not himself tell, much less can we, Co2 12:2, Co2 12:3. See Gen 15:12; Act 22:17.
2.He saw heaven opened, that he might be sure that his authority to go to Cornelius was indeed from heaven - that it was a divine light which altered his sentiments, and a divine power which gave him his commission. The opening of the heavens signified the opening of a mystery that had been hid, Rom 16:25.
3.He saw a great sheet full of all manner of living creatures, which descended from heaven, and was let down to him to the earth, that is, to the roof of the house where he now was. Here were not only beasts of the earth, but fowls of the air, which might have flown away, laid at his feet; and not only tame beasts, but wild. Here were no fishes of the sea, because there were none of them in particular unclean, but whatever had fins and scales was allowed to be eaten. Some make this sheet, thus filled, to represent the church of Christ. It comes down from heaven, from heaven opened, not only to send it down (Rev 21:2), but to receive souls sent up from it. It is knit at the four corners, to receive those from all parts of the world that are willing to be added to it; and to retain and keep those safe that are taken into it, that they may not fall out; and in this we find some of all countries, nations, and languages, without any distinction of Greek or Jew, or any disadvantage put upon Barbarian or Scythian, Col 3:11. The net of the gospel encloses all, both bad and good, those that before were clean and unclean. Or it may be applied to the bounty of the divine Providence, which, antecedently to the prohibitions of the ceremonial law, had given to man a liberty to use all the creatures, to which by the cancelling of that law we are now restored. By this vision we are taught to see all the benefit and service we have from the inferior creatures coming down to us from heaven; it is the gift of God who made them, made them fit for us, and then gave to man a right to them, and dominion over them. Lord, what is man that he should be thus magnified! Psa 8:4-8. How should it double our comfort in the creatures, and our obligations to serve God in the use of them, to see them thus let down to us out of heaven!
4.He was ordered by a voice from heaven to make use of this plenty and variety which God had sent him (Act 10:13): "Rise, Peter, kill and eat: without putting any difference between clean and unclean, take which thou hast most mind to." The distinction of meats which the law made was intended to put a difference between Jew and Gentile, that it might be difficult to them to dine and sup with a Gentile, because they would have that set before them which they were not allowed to eat; and now the taking off of that prohibition was a plain allowance to converse with the Gentiles, and to be free and familiar with them. Now they might fare as they fared, and therefore might eat with them, and be fellow-commoners with them.
5.He stuck to his principles, and would by no means hearken to the motion, though he was hungry (Act 10:14): Not so, Lord. Though hunger will break through stone walls, God's laws should be to us a stronger fence than stone walls, and not so easily broken through. And he will adhere to God's laws, though he has a countermand by a voice from heaven, not knowing at first but that Kill, and eat, was a command of trial whether he would adhere to the more sure word, the written law; and if so his answer had been very good, Not so, Lord. Temptations to eat forbidden fruit must not be parleyed with, but peremptorily rejected; we must startle at the thought of it: Not so, Lord. The reason he gives is, "For I have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean; hitherto I have kept my integrity in this matter, and will still keep it." If God, by his grace, has preserved us from gross sin unto this day, we should use this as an argument with ourselves to abstain from all appearance of evil. So strict were the pious Jews in this matter, that the seven brethren, those glorious martyrs under Antiochus, choose rather to be tortured to death in the most cruel manner that ever was than to eat swine's flesh, because it was forbidden by the law. No wonder then that Peter says it with so much pleasure, that his conscience could witness for him that he had never gratified his appetite with any forbidden food.
6.God, by a second voice from heaven, proclaimed the repeal of the law in this case (Act 10:15): What God hath cleansed, that call thou not common. He that made the law might alter it when he pleased, and reduce the matter to its first state. God had, for reasons suited to the Old Testament dispensation, restrained the Jews from eating such and such meats, to which, while that dispensation lasted, they were obliged in conscience to submit; but he has now, for reasons suited to the New Testament dispensation, taken off that restraint, and set the matter at large - has cleansed that which was before polluted to us, and we ought to make use of, and stand fast in, the liberty wherewith Christ has made us free, and not call that common or unclean which God has now declared clean. Note, We ought to welcome it as a great mercy that by the gospel of Christ we are freed from the distinction of meats, which was made by the law of Moses, and that now every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused; not so much because hereby we gain the use of swine's flesh, hares, rabbits, and other pleasant and wholesome food for our bodies, but chiefly because conscience is hereby freed from a yoke in things of this nature, that we might serve God without fear. Though the gospel has made duties which were not so by the law of nature, yet it has not, like the law of Moses, made sins that were not so. Those who command to abstain from some kinds of meat at some times of the year, and place religion in it, call that common which God hath cleansed, and in that error, more than in any truth, are the successors of Peter.
7.This was done thrice, Act 10:16. The sheet was drawn up a little way, and let down again the second time, and so the third time, with the same call to him, to kill, and eat, and the same reason, that what God hath cleansed we must not call common; but whether Peter's refusal was repeated the second and third time is not certain; surely it was not, when his objection had the first time received such a satisfactory answer. The trebling of Peter's vision, like the doubling of Pharaoh's dream, was to show that the thing was certain, and engage him to take so much the more notice of it. The instructions given us in the things of God, whether by the ear in the preaching of the word, or by the eye in sacraments, need to be often repeated; precept must be upon precept, and line upon line. But at last the vessel was received up into heaven. Those who make this vessel to represent the church, including both Jews and Gentiles, as this did both clean and unclean creatures, make this very aptly to signify the admission of the believing Gentiles into the church, and into heaven too, into the Jerusalem above. Christ has opened the kingdom of heaven to all believers, and there we shall find, besides those that are sealed out of all the tribes of Israel, an innumerable company out of every nation (Rev 7:9); but they are such as God has cleansed.
III.The providence which very opportunely explained this vision, and gave Peter to understand the intention of it, Act 10:17, Act 10:18.
1.What Christ did, Peter knew not just then (Joh 13:7): He doubted within himself what this vision which he had seen should mean. He had no reason to doubt the truth of it, that it was a heavenly vision; all his doubt was concerning the meaning of it. Note, Christ reveals himself to his people by degrees, and not all at once; and leaves them to doubt awhile, to ruminate upon a thing, and debate it to and fro in their own minds, before he clears it up to them.
2.Yet he was made to know presently, for the men who were sent from Cornelius were just now come to the house, and were at the gate enquiring whether Peter lodged there; and by their errand it will appear what was the meaning of this vision. Note, God knows what services are before us, and therefore how to prepare us; and we then better know the meaning of what he has taught us when we find what occasion we have to make use of it.
Historical interpretation
Two Centuries of Reception
3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
At the right time, the men come who resolve his confusion. When Christ allowed Joseph to be thrown into confusion, then too, he sent an archangel to him. Here Peter’s soul, having been confused, calmly accepts the resolution … when they inquire whether he is staying there.
And for all this, he knew not what it meant. "Now while Peter doubted in himself what this vision which he had seen should mean, behold, the men which were sent from Cornelius had made enquiry for Simon's house, and stood before the gate, and called, and asked whether Simon, which was surnamed Peter, were lodged there." But while Peter, it says, "doubted in himself," the men come at the right moment to solve his doubt: just as the Lord suffered Joseph first to be perturbed in mind, and then sends the Angel: for the soul with ease accepts the solution, when it has first been in perplexity.
"Now, whilst Peter was doubting within himself, what the vision that he had seen should mean," etc. As Peter thought in bewilderment about the above-mentioned vision, the Holy Ghost said to him: "Behold, men seek thee; Cornelius hath sent them. Arise and go with them, for they were sent at my behest to seek thee." When Peter had gone down to them without hesitation, they explained to him, in order, the reason why they were sent. Peter lodged them and, on the next day, he hastened to Cornelius with them. When Cornelius saw him, he fell at his feet and adored. Peter, retaining his humility, stopped Cornelius from it, asking him - even though he had been informed of it - for what reason he had had him called. Cornelius explained to him what he had been told by the angel when praying, and waited with the rest to hear from Peter what things might conduce to the salvation of all.
Continue studying Acts 10:17 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Acts 10:17 captures a pivotal moment of divine orchestration, juxtaposing Peter's profound internal struggle to comprehend a bewildering vision with the precise arrival of messengers sent by Cornelius, a Gentile centurion. While Peter grappled with the implications of God's command to disregard traditional dietary laws, signaling a deeper theological truth about the inclusion of all peoples, the men providentially reached his lodging, setting the stage for an unprecedented encounter that would fundamentally reshape the early Christian mission.
Context
Literary Context
Acts 10:17 immediately follows Peter's thrice-repeated vision detailed in Acts 10:9-16. In this vision, Peter saw a large sheet descending from heaven, filled with all kinds of animals, both clean and unclean, accompanied by a divine command to "kill and eat." Peter, a devout Jew, vehemently refused, citing the Mosaic dietary laws. The vision's repetition underscores its importance and Peter's deep-seated resistance. Simultaneously, the narrative has introduced Cornelius, a devout Roman centurion in Caesarea, who also received a divine vision instructing him to send for Peter (Acts 10:1-8). Verse 17 thus serves as the dramatic hinge, bringing Peter's internal theological wrestling into direct contact with the external, divinely appointed arrival of Cornelius's emissaries, perfectly aligning two separate divine initiatives.
Historical & Cultural Context
First-century Jewish society was deeply structured by the Mosaic Law, which included strict dietary regulations and purity codes that dictated separation from Gentiles. Jews considered Gentiles ritually unclean, and associating with them, especially sharing meals, was seen as defiling. Peter, as a faithful Jew and an apostle, adhered to these customs. His stay at the house of Simon the tanner in Joppa is itself noteworthy; tanners worked with dead animals, a profession that rendered them ritually unclean, suggesting Peter was already pushing some boundaries, though not yet the fundamental ones concerning Gentiles. The arrival of Roman soldiers, even messengers, at a Jewish home would have been highly unusual and potentially alarming, highlighting the cultural chasm that God was about to bridge. This verse sets up the profound challenge to deeply ingrained Jewish religious and social norms that the Spirit was initiating.
Key Themes
This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in Acts. Firstly, it highlights Divine Sovereignty and Orchestration, demonstrating God's meticulous timing and coordination of events to achieve His purposes, bringing Peter's internal struggle to a head precisely as Cornelius's men arrive. Secondly, it underscores the theme of Challenging Religious Preconceptions and Barriers. Peter's "doubts" are a microcosm of the Jewish church's struggle to understand God's radical inclusivity, which extends salvation beyond ethnic Israel. The vision and subsequent encounter with Cornelius's household in Acts 10:34-48 directly address the breaking down of the "dividing wall of hostility" (Ephesians 2:14) between Jew and Gentile. Finally, it signals the Expansion of the Gospel to the Gentiles, marking a pivotal moment in the early church's mission, moving beyond Jerusalem and Judea to the "uttermost part of the earth" as commanded in Acts 1:8.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
From dia (through) and aporéō (to be at a loss), this word signifies a state of being thoroughly nonplussed, utterly perplexed, or deeply troubled in mind. It conveys more than simple questioning; it describes an intense mental struggle to comprehend something profound and seemingly contradictory to one's established beliefs and traditions. Peter was wrestling with the divine implications of the vision, which challenged his entire worldview concerning clean and unclean.
This term refers to something gazed at, specifically a spectacle that is supernatural or divinely revealed. It emphasizes that what Peter experienced was not a dream or a hallucination, but a direct, divinely initiated communication, demanding his attention and interpretation. The use of hórama underscores the authoritative and revelatory nature of Peter's experience.
Composed of dia (through) and erōtáō (to ask), this verb means to question throughout, or to ascertain by thorough interrogation. It highlights the diligence and persistence of Cornelius's messengers in their search for Simon's house and Peter. Their methodical inquiry stands in stark contrast to Peter's internal confusion, yet both actions are divinely guided towards the same outcome.
Verse Breakdown
"Now while Peter doubted in himself what this vision which he had seen should mean"
This clause immediately places the reader within Peter's internal state of profound perplexity. Having just experienced a vision that defied his deeply ingrained Jewish understanding of purity and separation, Peter is in a state of intense mental wrestling, attempting to decipher the theological and practical implications of God's repeated command to "kill and eat" unclean animals. His "doubting in himself" indicates an internal, solitary struggle to reconcile the divine command with his traditional beliefs.
"behold, the men which were sent from Cornelius had made enquiry for Simon's house"
This phrase introduces the external, divinely orchestrated counterpoint to Peter's internal struggle. The word "behold" (Greek: idoú) serves as an interjection, drawing immediate attention to the sudden, providential arrival. These men, dispatched by Cornelius under divine instruction, have diligently sought out the specific location of Peter's lodging, highlighting their persistence and the precision of God's timing.
"and stood before the gate"
This final clause provides the dramatic culmination of the verse, marking the physical proximity of the Gentile messengers to Peter's location. Their presence at the gate signifies the imminent breakthrough of the gospel across cultural and religious barriers. The physical act of standing at the gate symbolizes the threshold moment where Peter's internal theological understanding is about to be confronted by the practical reality of God's inclusive plan for salvation, literally bringing the Gentile world to his doorstep.
Literary Devices
Acts 10:17 masterfully employs Juxtaposition to heighten the dramatic tension and underscore divine providence. Peter's internal, solitary struggle ("Peter doubted in himself") is immediately set against the external, active arrival of Cornelius's men ("behold, the men... had made enquiry... and stood before the gate"). This simultaneous occurrence of internal theological wrestling and external physical arrival emphasizes the perfect Divine Orchestration at play, where God is meticulously coordinating human actions and spiritual revelations to achieve His redemptive purposes. There is also an element of Dramatic Irony present; Peter is deeply confused by a vision intended to broaden his understanding, while the very embodiment of that broadened understanding (the Gentile messengers) arrives at his door, unbeknownst to him. This irony underscores the powerful, often unexpected, ways God works to dismantle human barriers and advance His kingdom.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Acts 10:17 is a profound testament to God's sovereign and meticulous orchestration of events to fulfill His redemptive plan. It reveals that God works not only through dramatic visions and direct commands but also through the precise timing of seemingly unrelated occurrences, bringing together disparate individuals for His glory. This moment highlights God's unwavering commitment to extending salvation beyond ethnic and cultural boundaries, demonstrating that His grace is for all humanity. It underscores the principle that God often challenges our deeply ingrained traditions and theological comfort zones to reveal a greater, more inclusive truth about His kingdom. Peter's struggle is a microcosm of the broader church's journey to embrace God's radical inclusivity, paving the way for the gospel to reach every nation, tribe, and tongue.
Reflection and Application
Acts 10:17 serves as a powerful reminder that God's plans often unfold in ways that challenge our preconceived notions and comfort zones. Like Peter, we may find ourselves "doubting" or perplexed when God calls us to step outside our familiar traditions, cultural norms, or theological frameworks. This verse encourages us to cultivate an attitude of openness and humility, trusting that God's timing is perfect and His purposes are always greater than our limited understanding. It calls us to examine our own biases and prejudices, particularly those that might hinder us from embracing and ministering to people from different backgrounds. Just as God used Peter to bridge the gap between Jew and Gentile, we are called to be agents of reconciliation, breaking down barriers that divide and fostering unity within the body of Christ. Our readiness to step out in faith, even when uncertain, is crucial for participating in God's ongoing mission to reach all people with the transformative power of the gospel.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was Peter "doubting" the vision, even after it was repeated?
Peter's doubt stemmed from the profound challenge the vision posed to his deeply ingrained Jewish understanding of ritual purity and separation from Gentiles. The dietary laws, as detailed in passages like Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14, were not mere traditions but divinely ordained commands that distinguished Israel as a holy people. For Peter, a devout Jew, the command to "kill and eat" unclean animals was an unthinkable transgression against centuries of covenantal practice. His perplexity was not a lack of faith in God's power, but a struggle to reconcile this new divine instruction with his established theological framework. God was preparing him for a radical shift in mission, not just about food, but about people, as seen when he later declares, "God has shown me that I should not call any person common or unclean" in Acts 10:28.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Acts 10:17, with Peter's internal struggle and the providential arrival of Cornelius's men, powerfully foreshadows the universal scope of Christ's redemptive work. The "unclean" animals in Peter's vision ultimately symbolize the Gentiles, whom God was now declaring "clean" through Christ's atoning sacrifice. Jesus himself, through His life, death, and resurrection, broke down the dividing wall of hostility between Jew and Gentile (Ephesians 2:14). His blood established a new covenant, making all who believe one in Him, regardless of their ethnic or social background (Galatians 3:28). Peter's vision and subsequent encounter with Cornelius's household in Acts 10:34-48 are the Spirit-empowered outworking of Christ's finished work, demonstrating that the gospel is for "everyone who believes" (Romans 1:16). This pivotal moment in Acts reveals that Christ is the fulfillment of God's ancient promise to bless all nations through Abraham (Genesis 12:3), establishing a new humanity where "Christ is all, and in all" (Colossians 3:11).