TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 2 Kings 4:38–44. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
We have here Elisha in his place, in his element, among the sons of the prophets, teaching them, and, as a father, providing for them; and happy it was for them that they had one over them who naturally cared for their state, under whom they were well fed and well taught. There was a dearth in the land, for the wickedness of those that dwelt therein, the same that we read of, Kg2 8:1. It continued seven years, just as long again as that in Elijah's time. A famine of bread there was, but not of hearing the word of God, for Elisha had the sons of the prophets sitting before him, to hear his wisdom, who were taught, that they might teach others. Two instances we have here of the care he took about their meat. Christ twice fed those to whom he preached. Elisha was in the more care about it now because of the dearth, that the sons of the prophets might not be ashamed in this evil time, but, even in the days of famine, might be satisfied, Psa 37:19.
I.He made hurtful food to become safe and wholesome.
1.On the lecture-day, the sons of the prophets being all to attend, he ordered his servant to provide food for their bodies, while he was breaking to them the bread of life for their souls. Whether there was any flesh-meat for them does not appear; he orders only that pottage should be seethed for them of herbs, Kg2 4:38. The sons of the prophets should be examples of temperance and mortification, not desirous of dainties, but content with plain food. If they have neither savoury meats nor sweet meats, nay, if a mess of pottage be all the dinner, let them remember that this great prophet entertained himself and his guests no better.
2.One of the servitors, who was sent to gather herbs (which, it should seem, must serve instead of flesh for the pottage), by mistake brought in that which was noxious, or at least very nauseous, and shred it into the pottage: wild gourds they are called, Kg2 4:39. Some think it was coloquintida, a herb strongly cathartic, and, if not qualified, dangerous. The sons of the prophets, it seems, were better skilled in divinity than in natural philosophy, and read their Bibles more than their herbals. If any of the fruits of the earth be hurtful, we must look upon it as an effect of the curse (thorns and thistles shall it bring forth unto thee), for the original blessing made all good.
3.The guests complained to Elisha of the unwholesomeness of their food. Nature has given man the sense of tasting, not only that wholesome food may be pleasant, but that that which is unwholesome may be discovered before it comes to the stomach; the mouth tries meat by tasting it, Job 12:11. This pottage was soon found by the taste of it to be dangerous, so that they cried out, There is death in the pot, Kg2 4:40. The table often becomes a snare, and that which should be for our welfare proves a trap, which is a good reason why we should not feed ourselves without fear; when we are receiving the supports and comforts of life we must keep up an expectation of death and a fear of sin.
4.Elisha immediately cured the bad taste and prevented the bad consequences of this unwholesome pottage; as before he had healed the bitter waters with salt, so now the bitter broth with meal, Kg2 4:41. It is probable that there was meal in it before, but that was put in by a common hand, only to thicken the pottage; this was the same thing, but cast in by Elisha's hand, and with intent to heal the pottage, by which it appears that the change was not owing to the meal (that was the sign only, not the means), but to the divine power. Now all was well, not only no death, but no harm in the pot. We must acknowledge God's goodness in making our food wholesome and nourishing. I am the Lord that healeth thee.
II.He made a little food to go a great way.
1.Elisha had a present brought him of twenty barley-loaves and some ears of corn (Kg2 4:42), a present which, in those ages, would not be despicable at any time, but now in a special manner valuable, when there was a dearth in the land. It is said to be of the first-fruits, which was God's due out of their increase; and when the priests and Levites were all at Jerusalem, out of their reach, the religious people among them, with good reason, looked upon the prophets as God's receivers, and brought their first-fruits to them, which helped to maintain their schools.
2.Having freely received, he freely gave, ordering it all to be set before the sons of the prophets, reserving none for himself, none for the hereafter. "Let the morrow take thought for the things of itself, give it all to the people that they may eat." It well becomes the men of God to be generous and open-handed, and the fathers of the prophets to be liberal to the sons of the prophets.
3.Though the loaves were little, it is likely no more than what one man would ordinarily eat at a meal, yet with twenty of them he satisfied 100 men, Kg2 4:43, Kg2 4:44. his servant thought that to set so little meat before so many men was but to tantalize them, and shame his master for making so great an invitation to such short commons; but he in God's name, pronounced it a full meal for them, and so it proved; they did eat, and left thereof, not because their stomachs failed them, but because the bread increased in the eating. God has promised his church (Psa 132:15) that he will abundantly bless her provision, and satisfy her poor with bread; for whom he feeds he fills, and what he blesses comes to much, as what he blows upon comes to little, Hag 1:9. Christ's feeding his hearers was a miracle far beyond this; but both teach us that those who wait upon God in the way of duty may hope to be both protected and supplied by a particular care of divine Providence.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Elisha corrects the nature of the cooked foods with some flour and gives them a new taste. Our Lord did the same according to the [divine] economy, so that he might be imitated, as he said for our exhortation, with the result that we might walk the path of the righteous and the pious, and might rejoice because of the great reward he promised us and might heal the diseases and the anguish and the tribulations that constantly surround us from the beginning of our life. The father of our race, Adam, gathered those [bitter] fruits as a consequence of his sin and proposed and offered them to us in the hour in which he heard [these words] from his Creator: “The ground is cursed because of you; it will bring forth thorns and thistles for you. You are dust, and to dust you shall return.”
This was the starving steward of the prophets who was forced by the lack of food to go through the fields in order to gather some herbs. And since he could not find the herbs he knew, he gathered those that he did not know and were not edible. And since it is written that he gathered wild colocynths, some say that he gathered colocynths, others those [herbs] that are called the source of bitterness: with their inside parts, physicians make an effective and purifying medicine. Others say that perhaps their name comes from the term used by farmers: squirting cucumbers, which have a very bitter taste and resemble a vine. In fact, the Scripture calls a vine that plant that the steward found and from which he gathered colocynths.
Continue studying 2 Kings 4:40 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Vividly recounts a moment of dire peril among the "sons of the prophets" gathered with Elisha in Gilgal. Amidst a severe famine, a communal meal prepared from foraged wild herbs unexpectedly becomes a source of death due to the inclusion of poisonous gourds. The desperate, collective cry, "O thou man of God, there is death in the pot," encapsulates their sudden realization of imminent mortal danger and their immediate, urgent appeal for divine intervention through Elisha, highlighting humanity's fragility and profound dependence on God's miraculous provision.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is situated within a series of miraculous accounts in 2 Kings 4 that underscore Elisha's prophetic authority and God's active power in the lives of His people. The narrative immediately precedes the miraculous feeding of one hundred men (2 Kings 4:42-44) and follows other demonstrations of Elisha's power, such as the multiplication of the widow's oil (2 Kings 4:1-7) and the raising of the Shunammite woman's son (2 Kings 4:8-37). The pericope of the poisoned pottage (2 Kings 4:38-41) specifically highlights God's ability to sustain His servants even when human efforts lead to danger. The recurring theme throughout 2 Kings is the Lord's faithfulness to His covenant people, often demonstrated through His prophets, even amidst Israel's spiritual decline.
Historical & Cultural Context
The events transpire in Gilgal, a historically significant site in Israel, known for its association with Joshua and the Israelites' entry into the Promised Land (Joshua 5:9-10). The phrase "there was a dearth in the land" (2 Kings 4:38) points to a severe famine, a common affliction in ancient Israel, often resulting from drought or warfare, and sometimes interpreted as divine judgment. During such periods, foraging for wild edibles was a necessary but perilous practice. The "wild gourds" (Hebrew: paqqu'ot sadeh), likely Citrullus colocynthis or a similar bitter cucumber, were known to be highly toxic, causing severe gastrointestinal distress and even death. The "sons of the prophets" were a recognized community or guild of prophets, living communally under the guidance of a senior prophet like Elisha. Their shared meal reflects the communal lifestyle and mutual dependence characteristic of these prophetic schools, emphasizing their vulnerability and reliance on divine provision.
Key Themes
This narrative powerfully illustrates several profound themes. Firstly, it underscores Divine Provision and Sustenance in the face of human vulnerability and scarcity. Despite the famine and the accidental introduction of poison, God, through Elisha, miraculously intervenes to provide safe nourishment, reinforcing His unwavering care for His people. This echoes earlier provisions, such as the manna in the wilderness (Exodus/16) and the widow's unfailing oil (2 Kings 4:1-7). Secondly, the incident highlights the Authority and Efficacy of God's Prophet. The immediate cry, "O thou man of God," signifies the prophets' recognition of Elisha's unique spiritual authority and their profound trust in his direct connection to the Almighty. Elisha acts as God's instrument, demonstrating God's active presence and power among His people, confirming his role as a true prophet in a time when false prophets were prevalent. Thirdly, the story subtly touches upon the theme of Discernment and Danger, illustrating how easily life-sustaining provisions can become life-threatening without careful attention or divine intervention, serving as a stark reminder of the hidden dangers in the world and the need for spiritual vigilance.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This primitive root means "to pour out," often implying a decisive act of distribution or even casting, as in metal. Here, it describes the act of serving the pottage, a seemingly mundane action that immediately precedes the dramatic discovery of poison. The word emphasizes the finality of the preparation and the readiness for consumption, heightening the tension as the men partake of the deadly meal. It sets the stage for the sudden, horrifying realization of the danger.
Derived from a root meaning "to die," this noun refers to natural or violent death, and concretely, the dead or their state. The declaration "death in the pot" is stark and unambiguous. It is not merely "poison" or "sickness," but "death," conveying the immediate, certain, and lethal nature of the threat. This strong word choice underscores the absolute peril and the men's profound realization of their impending doom, leaving no room for doubt about the severity of the situation. It highlights the stark contrast between nourishment and demise.
This title, composed of "man" (H376, referring to an individual or male person) and "God" (H430, referring to the supreme God), is applied to Elisha, just as it was to Elijah before him, and signifies a prophet specially designated and empowered by God. It implies a direct conduit for divine power and revelation. The desperate cry "O thou man of God" is not merely an address but a profound plea, recognizing Elisha's unique spiritual authority and their only hope for intervention in a seemingly hopeless situation. It reflects their faith in his ability to mediate God's life-saving power.
Verse Breakdown
"So they poured out for the men to eat."
This opening clause sets the scene of a communal meal, a seemingly ordinary act of hospitality and sustenance. It implies the completion of the cooking process and the immediate distribution of the food, building anticipation for the consumption of the pottage. The mundane nature of this act contrasts sharply with the horror that is about to unfold.
"And it came to pass, as they were eating of the pottage, that they cried out, and said, O [thou] man of God, [there is] death in the pot."
This is the dramatic climax of the verse. The act of eating, meant to bring nourishment, immediately triggers a desperate, collective outcry. The phrase "as they were eating" suggests the immediate and widespread recognition of the danger, likely through the extremely bitter taste or rapid physical reaction. Their direct address to Elisha as "man of God" underscores their immediate appeal to divine authority through him, recognizing him as their only hope. The concise, vivid, and terrifying declaration "death in the pot" expresses the lethal nature of the food with stark simplicity and urgent clarity, conveying their profound realization of imminent doom.
"And they could not eat [thereof]."
This concluding clause reinforces the severity of the situation. It's not merely a bad taste; the food is utterly inedible and life-threatening. The inability to eat signifies the complete cessation of the meal, highlighting their helplessness and the immediate halt to their consumption, preventing further harm but also leaving them without sustenance. It emphasizes the absolute nature of the threat and their dependence on a miracle.
Literary Devices
The narrative in 2 Kings 4:40 effectively employs several literary devices to heighten its impact and convey its theological message. Irony is prominent, as a communal meal intended for sustenance and fellowship becomes a sudden source of death, turning a basic human need into a mortal threat. This creates a powerful contrast between expectation and the horrifying reality. The phrase "death in the pot" functions as potent symbolism, representing not just physical poison but also the hidden dangers that can lurk in seemingly harmless or even beneficial things, illustrating how easily corruption can infiltrate life-sustaining elements. The sudden, collective "cried out" creates a strong sense of dramatic tension and urgency, immediately drawing the reader into the immediate crisis and the men's panic. The men's direct appeal to Elisha as the "man of God" is a form of apostrophe, a direct address to a person (or personified entity), emphasizing their desperate reliance on his spiritual authority and direct connection to the divine for deliverance.
Theological and Thematic Connections
The incident of the poisoned pottage in 2 Kings 4:40 serves as a powerful testament to God's sovereign power over life and death, even in the most mundane and unexpected circumstances. It reinforces the profound theme of divine provision in the face of human error, scarcity, and mortal danger, demonstrating that God's meticulous care extends to the physical well-being of His servants. The immediate recognition of "death in the pot" and the desperate cry to the "man of God" highlight humanity's inherent vulnerability and the critical need for divine intervention when faced with overwhelming, self-inflicted dangers. This narrative underscores the truth that true security, sustenance, and salvation ultimately come from God, often mediated through His chosen instruments, and that His power is sufficient to transform even the most dire situations.
Reflection and Application
The stark declaration "death in the pot" in 2 Kings 4:40 offers profound lessons for contemporary believers, serving as a potent metaphor for the hidden dangers and spiritual poisons that can subtly infiltrate our lives. Just as the wild gourds looked like edible herbs, so too can destructive ideologies, unhealthy relationships, misleading information, or subtle temptations appear harmless or even beneficial at first glance. This narrative calls us to cultivate spiritual discernment, to "taste and see" what we consume—whether it be media, doctrines, or influences—and to recognize the potential for "death" in what appears to be nourishment. When we perceive such spiritual or moral dangers, the immediate and desperate response of the prophets provides a timeless model: an urgent cry to the "man of God," which for us, is a direct and fervent appeal to God through prayer, seeking His purification, wisdom, and deliverance. It reminds us that our ultimate safety, spiritual sustenance, and true life come from Him alone, and He possesses the power to transform even the most dire and poisonous situations into opportunities for His grace, glory, and life-giving intervention.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What were the "wild gourds" mentioned in this passage?
The "wild gourds" (Hebrew: פַּקֻּעֹת שָׂדֶה, paqqu'ot sadeh) were likely a type of wild cucumber or colocynth (Citrullus colocynthis), a plant common in the Middle East. While related to edible gourds, these particular wild varieties are extremely bitter and poisonous, causing severe gastrointestinal distress, purging, and even death if consumed in significant quantities. The servant's error was one of ignorance, mistaking them for edible herbs, highlighting the dangers of foraging without proper knowledge, especially during a famine when hunger drives people to seek any available food. The plant's extreme bitterness would have been the immediate indicator of its lethal nature, prompting the cry, "[there is] death in the pot!" (2 Kings 4:40).
What does "death in the pot" signify beyond physical poison?
While literally referring to the poisonous nature of the pottage, "death in the pot" also carries significant symbolic weight. It represents any hidden danger or corrupting influence that, despite appearing innocuous or even beneficial, can lead to spiritual, moral, or physical destruction. It speaks to the insidious nature of evil or error that can infiltrate our lives, relationships, communities, or even our spiritual practices, turning what should be life-giving into something deadly. The phrase serves as a powerful warning to exercise discernment and vigilance against subtle forms of corruption or harm, reminding us that not all that appears nourishing truly is. This concept is echoed in passages like Proverbs 14:12, which warns that "there is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way to death."
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The incident of the poisoned pottage in 2 Kings 4:40 finds its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment in Jesus, who is the true source of life and purification for a world poisoned by sin. Elisha's miraculous act of rendering the deadly pottage harmless with a handful of meal powerfully foreshadows Christ's divine power to transform that which is cursed and bring life from death. Just as the "sons of the prophets" cried out to the "man of God" for deliverance from physical death, humanity, poisoned by sin, cries out to the ultimate "Man of God," Jesus Christ, for salvation from spiritual death. He is the bread of life who offers true and eternal sustenance, ensuring that those who partake of Him will never hunger or thirst. Unlike the poisoned pottage, the Lord's Supper, a sacred meal that symbolizes Christ's body and blood, is the ultimate source of spiritual nourishment and eternal life, purifying us from all sin and death. Through His sacrificial death on the cross, Jesus took the "death in the pot" of humanity's sin upon Himself, offering us life abundant and eternal. He is the one who truly purifies all that is deadly, transforming it into a source of grace, redemption, and everlasting life.