2 Kings 3:5

But it came to pass, when Ahab was dead, that the king of Moab rebelled against the king of Israel.

But it came to pass, when Ahab {H256} was dead {H4194}, that the king {H4428} of Moab {H4124} rebelled {H6586} against the king {H4428} of Israel {H3478}.

But after Ach'av died, the king of Mo'av rebelled against the king of Isra'el.

But after the death of Ahab, the king of Moab rebelled against the king of Israel.

But it came to pass, when Ahab was dead, that the king of Moab rebelled against the king of Israel.

Commentary

This verse marks a significant turning point in the relationship between Israel and its neighbor, Moab, immediately following a period of political transition in Israel.

Context

The preceding verses introduce King Mesha of Moab, who had been a vassal of Israel, paying substantial tribute during the reigns of Ahab and his son Ahaziah (2 Kings 3:4). The death of King Ahab, a powerful but notoriously wicked king of Israel, is the catalyst for this rebellion. Ahab's death is recorded in 1 Kings 22:37, after which his son Ahaziah reigned briefly, followed by Jehoram (Joram), his other son, who is the "king of Israel" referred to here. This rebellion is also mentioned earlier in the book, indicating its immediate occurrence after Ahab's demise (2 Kings 1:1), setting the stage for the military campaign described in 2 Kings chapter 3.

Key Themes

  • Political Instability: The death of a strong, even if unrighteous, ruler like Ahab often created power vacuums or opportunities for subjugated nations to assert independence. Moab seized this moment to break free from Israelite dominion.
  • Consequences of Leadership: Ahab's reign was marked by idolatry and moral decline, leading to divine judgment against his house (1 Kings 21:21). His death, while a form of judgment, also ushered in a period of external challenge for Israel, highlighting how a leader's actions can have lasting national consequences.
  • Cycles of Rebellion: Throughout biblical history, vassal states often rebelled when the dominant power weakened or changed leadership. This verse illustrates the ongoing struggle for control and autonomy among the ancient Near Eastern kingdoms.

Linguistic Insights

The Hebrew word for "rebelled" is pasha' (׀ָּשַׁג), which means to transgress, revolt, or rebel. It implies a breaking of a covenant or an established agreement, in this case, the tributary relationship between Moab and Israel. This was not merely a political maneuver but a deliberate act of breaking allegiance.

Practical Application

This historical account reminds us that leadership transitions can be volatile periods. It also underscores the ripple effects of a leader's character and decisions; Ahab's legacy, though he was gone, continued to influence Israel's national security and relationships. For believers, it's a reminder that even in the midst of political turmoil and shifting allegiances, God remains sovereign over the affairs of nations, orchestrating events according to His purposes (Daniel 2:21).

Note: If the commentary doesn’t appear instantly, please allow 2–5 seconds for it to load. It is generated by Gemini 2.5 Flash using a prompt focused on Biblical fidelity over bias. While the insights have been consistently reliable, we encourage prayerful discernment through the Holy Spirit.

Please note that only the commentary section is AI-generated β€” the main Scripture and cross-references are stored on the site and are from trusted and verified sources.

Cross-References

  • 2 Kings 1:1

    ΒΆ Then Moab rebelled against Israel after the death of Ahab.

  • 2 Chronicles 21:8

    In his days the Edomites revolted from under the dominion of Judah, and made themselves a king.

  • 2 Chronicles 21:10

    So the Edomites revolted from under the hand of Judah unto this day. The same time [also] did Libnah revolt from under his hand; because he had forsaken the LORD God of his fathers.

  • 2 Kings 8:20

    In his days Edom revolted from under the hand of Judah, and made a king over themselves.
← Back