See on the biblical-era map

Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 2 Chronicles 25:17–28. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
We have here this degenerate prince mortified by his neighbour and murdered by his own subjects.
I.Never was proud prince more thoroughly mortified than Amaziah was by Joash king of Israel.
1.This part of the story (which was as fully related Kg2 14:8, etc., as it is here) - embracing the foolish challenge which Amaziah sent to Joash (Ch2 25:17), his haughty scornful answer to it (Ch2 25:18), with the friendly advice he gave him to sit still and know when he was well off, (Ch2 25:19), - his wilfully persisting in his challenge (Ch2 25:20, Ch2 25:21), the defeat that was given him (Ch2 25:22), and the calamity he brought upon himself and his city thereby (Ch2 25:23, Ch2 25:24), - verifies two of Solomon's proverbs: - (1.) That a man's pride will bring him low, Pro 29:23. It goes before his destruction; not only procures it meritoriously, but is often the immediate occasion of it. He that exalteth himself shall be abased. (2.) That he that goes forth hastily to strive will probably not know what to do in the end thereof, when his neighbour has put him to shame, Pro 25:8. He that is fond of contention may have enough of it sooner than he thinks of.
2.But there are two passages in this story which we had not before in the Kings.
(1.)That Amaziah took advice before he challenged the king of Israel, Ch2 25:17. But of whom? Not of the prophet - he was not made of the king's counsel; but of his statesmen that would flatter him and bid him go up and prosper. It is good to take advice, but then it must be of those that are fit to advise us. Those that will not take advice from the word of God, which would guide them aright, will justly be left to the bad advice of those that will counsel them to their destruction. Let those be made fools that will not be made wise.
(2.)Amaziah's imprudence is here made the punishment of his impiety (Ch2 25:20): It was of the Lord; he left him to himself to act thus foolishly, that he and his people might be delivered into the hands of their enemies, because they had forsaken God and sought after the gods of Edom. Those that will not persuaded to do well for their souls will justly be given up to their own counsels to do ill for themselves even in their outward affairs.
II.Never was poor prince more violently pursued by his own subjects.
From the time that he departed from the Lord (so it may be read, Ch2 25:27) the hearts of his subjects departed from him, and they began to form a design against him in Jerusalem. It is probable they were exasperated against him more for his rashly engaging in a war against Israel than for his worshipping the gods of Edom. But at length the ferment grew so high, and he perceived the plot to be laid so deeply, that he thought fit to quit his royal city and flee to Lachish, either as a private place where he might be hid or as a strong place where he might be guarded; but they sent after him thither, and slew him there. By this the putting of him to death seems to have been done deliberately, and to have been the act, not of a disgusted servant or two, but of a considerable body that durst avow it. How unrighteous soever they were herein, God was righteous.
Continue studying 2 Chronicles 25:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
2 Chronicles 25:26 serves as a formulaic concluding statement for the reign of King Amaziah of Judah, a common literary device employed by the Chronicler and the authors of Kings. This verse indicates that while the inspired biblical narrative provides a divinely guided and sufficient account for its theological purposes, it is not an exhaustive biography of the king. Instead, it points readers to external, more detailed historical records of the time, specifically "the book of the kings of Judah and Israel," for comprehensive details of Amaziah's "first and last" acts, thereby affirming the historical grounding of the biblical account while underscoring its unique spiritual focus.
Context
Literary Context
This verse appears at the conclusion of the narrative detailing King Amaziah's reign in 2 Chronicles 25. The chapter meticulously chronicles his initial period of obedience to the Lord, albeit with a heart described as "not wholly true" in 2 Chronicles 25:2. It highlights his military successes, particularly against Edom, and his judicious handling of his father's assassins. However, the narrative sharply pivots after his decisive victory over Edom, revealing Amaziah's tragic and defiant turn to idolatry. He brings back and worships the very gods of the defeated Edomites, a clear act of apostasy detailed in 2 Chronicles 25:14. This profound disobedience leads to divine judgment, a humiliating defeat by King Joash of Israel, the breaching of Jerusalem's walls, and ultimately, Amaziah's assassination by conspirators. The Chronicler, similar to the authors of the Books of Kings, frequently employs these summary statements to mark the end of a king's story, directing readers to more extensive, extra-biblical records for full biographical details, while emphasizing the spiritual trajectory and theological implications of their reign.
Historical & Cultural Context
In the ancient Near East, it was a common and well-established practice for kingdoms to maintain official court annals or chronicles. These records served as state archives, meticulously documenting the reigns of kings, significant events, military campaigns, administrative decisions, and diplomatic relations. They were typically kept by royal scribes and provided a continuous historical record for the kingdom. The phrase "the book of the kings of Judah and Israel" mentioned here refers to such an official state chronicle, or perhaps a collection of such chronicles, which are now lost to us. These served as primary historical sources for the biblical authors of Chronicles and Kings. It is crucial to understand that these external records were distinct from the inspired biblical text itself but provided the factual framework upon which the divinely guided narrative was constructed. The mention of both Judah and Israel suggests a comprehensive record system that, at least retrospectively, covered both the northern and southern kingdoms, even after their division following Solomon's reign.
Key Themes
This concluding verse contributes to several important theological and narrative themes within Chronicles and the broader Old Testament. Firstly, it underscores the Theological Purpose of Scripture. The Bible is not merely a secular history textbook aiming for exhaustive detail; rather, it is a divinely inspired narrative that selectively presents events to reveal God's character, His covenant relationship with His people, the consequences of obedience and disobedience, and the unfolding of His redemptive plan. The Chronicler's particular emphasis is often on immediate divine retribution or blessing based on a king's faithfulness, as seen in the contrasting outcomes of Amaziah's early obedience versus his later idolatry in 2 Chronicles 25. Secondly, the reference to external records highlights Divine Sovereignty over History, implying that God oversees and uses human history and its documentation, even secular records, to establish the factual basis of the biblical narrative. Lastly, the phrase "the rest of the acts" points to the Accountability of Leadership. It suggests that the comprehensive record of a ruler's deeds, both commendable and flawed, is preserved in history and ultimately before God, emphasizing their ultimate responsibility for their actions and the spiritual trajectory of their reign, as vividly illustrated by Amaziah's mixed legacy and tragic end.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This word (דָבָר) is often translated as "acts" or "deeds," but its semantic range is much broader, encompassing "words," "affairs," "events," "matters," or "chronicles." In this context, it implies a comprehensive account or record of a king's entire reign, encompassing all his significant undertakings, decisions, and experiences. It suggests a full historical documentation beyond what is presented in the inspired biblical narrative, emphasizing the totality of Amaziah's public and private life as recorded in external annals.
(רִאשֹׁן) and H314 (אַחֲרֹן), this is a Hebrew merism, a literary device where two contrasting parts represent the whole. "First" denotes the beginning (in place, time, or rank), and "last" denotes the end or hinder part. Applied to Amaziah's acts, this phrase signifies totality and completeness, meaning "from beginning to end" or "in their entirety." It emphasizes that the external record contained the full scope of his reign, from its inception to its conclusion, leaving no period undocumented.
This word (סֵפֶר) properly refers to "writing" (the art or a document) and by implication, a "book." It can also mean a "bill," "evidence," "letter," "register," or "scroll." In this context, "book" refers to official, non-canonical state annals or chronicles that were maintained by the royal courts. These were historical documents, distinct from the inspired Scriptures, which served as primary sources for the biblical authors of Kings and Chronicles, affirming the historical grounding of the biblical narrative.
Verse Breakdown
"Now the rest of the acts of Amaziah, first and last"
This introductory clause signals to the reader that the biblical account of King Amaziah's reign is drawing to a close. It explicitly states that there exists a more comprehensive, external record of his entire life and rule, encompassing everything "from beginning to end." This implies that the inspired text has selectively presented what is necessary for its theological purpose, leaving other details to be found elsewhere.
"behold, [are] they not written"
This rhetorical question serves to emphatically affirm the existence and accessibility of these external historical records. It is a common literary device in the historical books, engaging the reader and asserting the factual basis of the narrative by pointing to readily available (at the time of writing) documentation that would corroborate the biblical account.
"in the book of the kings of Judah and Israel?"
This specifies the particular source of these comprehensive records. It refers to official state chronicles that documented the reigns of kings from both the northern kingdom of Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah, serving as a widely recognized historical reference point for the Chronicler's audience, validating the historical context of the biblical narrative.
Literary Devices
The verse employs several significant literary devices that enhance its meaning and impact. The most prominent is the Rhetorical Question ("are they not written?"), which serves not to elicit an answer, but to emphatically affirm the existence and common knowledge of the external historical records. This device engages the reader and lends credibility to the biblical narrative by referencing verifiable sources. Furthermore, the phrase "first and last" is a clear example of a Merism, a figure of speech where two contrasting parts stand for the whole, emphasizing the comprehensive nature of the external records of Amaziah's reign, covering every aspect from inception to conclusion. Finally, the entire verse functions as a Formulaic Conclusion or Colophon, a recurring literary pattern found at the end of a king's narrative in both Kings and Chronicles. This formula signals the completion of a particular segment of the historical narrative and directs the reader to supplementary historical documentation, underscoring the biblical author's reliance on existing records while maintaining the unique divine inspiration and theological focus of the biblical text itself.
Theological and Thematic Connections
2 Chronicles 25:26 powerfully reiterates that the Bible's primary purpose is not to serve as an exhaustive historical encyclopedia but as a divinely inspired revelation of God's character, His dealings with humanity, and His unfolding plan of redemption. The existence of external records, to which the biblical authors freely refer, validates the historical grounding of Scripture, demonstrating that its narratives are rooted in real events and verifiable history. However, the Bible's selectivity underscores its unique spiritual authority and sufficiency for faith and practice, focusing on the spiritual lessons, moral implications, and theological truths embedded within historical accounts. It reminds us that while human history records "acts, first and last," the divine record evaluates them through the lens of covenant faithfulness and obedience to God, revealing the spiritual trajectory and ultimate consequences of a life lived for or against the Lord.
Reflection and Application
This seemingly simple concluding verse carries profound implications for our lives today. It reminds us that while the details of our lives may not be recorded in human annals or public records, all our "acts, first and last," are known to God. This truth calls us to live with integrity, purpose, and a constant awareness of our ultimate accountability before our Creator. The Bible's selective nature, focusing on what is spiritually significant, encourages us to prioritize the eternal over the temporal and to seek out the spiritual lessons embedded within every narrative, rather than merely historical facts. Amaziah's story, even in its summarized form, serves as a poignant warning about the dangers of partial obedience and the devastating consequences of turning away from God after experiencing His blessings. We are called to wholehearted devotion, not just outward conformity, recognizing that God sees beyond our public "acts" into the true condition of our hearts and motives. Our lives are being written, not just in human memory, but in the eternal record of God's knowledge, prompting us to live in a manner worthy of His calling.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What is "the book of the kings of Judah and Israel" mentioned here?
It refers to a non-canonical, official state chronicle or set of annals maintained by the royal courts of the kingdoms of Judah and Israel. These were historical records, likely kept by royal scribes, that meticulously documented the reigns, wars, significant events, and administrative decisions of the kings. The biblical authors of Kings and Chronicles frequently refer to these external sources, indicating that they were drawing upon existing historical documentation for their narratives, even as they shaped those narratives with a distinct theological purpose. These specific books are now lost to us, but their mention affirms the historical grounding of the biblical narrative.
Does this verse imply the Bible is incomplete or not exhaustive?
No, it does not imply the Bible is incomplete in its divine purpose. Rather, it highlights the Bible's selectivity and sufficiency. The biblical authors, guided by the Holy Spirit, chose specific events and details to convey God's redemptive plan, His character, and the consequences of human actions. The mention of external records confirms the historical grounding of the biblical narrative while affirming that its primary goal is theological and spiritual instruction, not exhaustive secular history. As John 20:30-31 states regarding Jesus' ministry, "Now Jesus did many other signs in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book; but these are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name." The Bible contains everything necessary for faith and salvation, perfectly fulfilling its divine mandate.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
While earthly kings like Amaziah have their "acts, first and last," recorded in human annals, often revealing mixed motives and ultimate failure, the ultimate and perfect "record" is found in the person and work of Jesus Christ. His life is the perfect fulfillment of God's righteous reign, not merely documented in external chronicles, but eternally established in the divine plan. Unlike Amaziah, whose partial obedience and idolatry led to his downfall, Christ's entire life was one of perfect, unwavering obedience to the Father, from His miraculous incarnation to His atoning death and glorious resurrection. His "acts, first and last," are not merely historical events but the very foundation of salvation, perfectly fulfilling all righteousness and providing a complete and sufficient record of obedience for all who believe, enabling them to stand righteous before God, for He "made him who knew no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God" (2 Corinthians 5:21). The historical accounts of flawed kings in the Old Testament, with their external records, point to the desperate need for a perfect King, one whose reign is not marked by human frailty or partial obedience, but by complete faithfulness and divine power. Jesus is that King, whose triumph over sin and death on the cross disarmed the spiritual forces of evil (Colossians 2:15) and established an eternal kingdom (Luke 1:33) that will never end. He is the faithful and true witness whose entire life and redemptive work are perfectly recorded in the divine narrative, culminating in His resurrection and ascension, providing the ultimate and complete record for humanity's salvation and eternal hope.