TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Timothy 5:3–16. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Directions are here given concerning the taking of widows into the number of those who were employed by the church and had maintenance from the church: Honour widows that are widows indeed. Honour them, that is, maintain them, admit them into office. There was in those times an office in the church in which widows were employed, and that was to tend the sick and the aged, to look to them by the direction of the deacons. We read of the care taken of widows immediately upon the first forming of the Christian church (Act 6:1), where the Grecians thought their widows were neglected in the daily ministration and provision made for poor widows. The general rule is to honour widows that are widows indeed, to maintain them, to relieve them with respect and tenderness.
I.It is appointed that those widows only should be relieved by the charity of the church who were pious and devout, and not wanton widows that lived in pleasure, Ti1 5:5, Ti1 5:6. She is to be reckoned a widow indeed, and it to be maintained at the church's charge, who, being desolate, trusteth in God. Observe, It is the duty and comfort of those who are desolate to trust in God. Therefore God sometimes brings his people into such straits that they have nothing else to trust to, that they may with more confidence trust in him. Widowhood is a desolate estate; but let the widows trust in me (Jer 49:11), and rejoice that they have a God to trust to. Again, Those who trust in God must continue in prayer. If by faith we confide in God, by prayer we must give glory to God and commit ourselves to his guidance. Anna was a widow indeed, who departed not from the temple (Luk 2:37), but served God with fasting and prayer night and day. But she is not a widow indeed that lives in pleasure (Ti1 5:6), or who lives licentiously. A jovial widow is not a widow indeed, not fit to be taken under the care of the church. She that lives in pleasure is dead while she lives, is no living member of the church, but as a carcase in it, or a mortified member. We may apply it more generally; those who live in pleasure are dead while they live, spiritually dead, dead in trespasses and sins; they are in the world to no purpose, buried alive as to the great ends of living.
II.Another rule he gives is that the church should not be charged with the maintenance of those widows who had relations of their own that were able to maintain them. This is mentioned several times (Ti1 5:4): If any widow have children or nephews, that is grandchildren or near relations, let them maintain them, and let not the church be burdened. So Ti1 5:16. This is called showing piety at home (Ti1 5:4), or showing piety towards their own families. Observe, The respect of children to their parents, with their care of them, is fitly called piety. This is requiting their parents. Children can never sufficiently requite their parents for the care they have taken of them, and the pains they have taken with them; but they must endeavour to do it. It is the indispensable duty of children, if their parents be in necessity, and they in ability to relieve them, to do it to the utmost of their power, for this is good and acceptable before God. The Pharisees taught that a gift to the altar was more acceptable to God than relieving a poor parent, Mat 15:5. But here we are told that this is better than all burnt-offerings and sacrifices; this is good and acceptable, etc. He speaks of this again (Ti1 5:8), If any provide not for his own, etc. If any men or women do not maintain their own poor relations who belong to them, they do in effect deny the faith; for the design of Christ was to confirm the law of Moses, and particularly the law of the fifth commandment, which is, Honour thy father and mother; so that those deny the faith who disobey that law, much more if they provide not for their wives and children, who are parts of themselves; if they spend that upon their lusts which should maintain their families, they have denied the faith and are worse than infidels. One reason why this care must be taken that those who are rich should maintain their poor relations, and not burden the church with them is (Ti1 5:16) that it may relieve those who are widows indeed. Observe, Charity misplaced is a great hindrance to true charity; there should be prudence in the choice of the objects of charity, that it may not be thrown away upon those who are not properly so, that there may be the more for those who are real objects of charity.
III.He gives directions concerning the characters of the widows that were to be taken into the number to receive the church's charity:
not under sixty years old, nor any who have divorced their husbands or been divorced from them and have married again; she must have been the wife of one man, such as had been a housekeeper, had a good name for hospitality and charity, well reported of for good works. Observe, Particular care ought to be taken to relieve those, when they fall into decay, who, when they had wherewithal, were ready to every good work. Here are instances of such good works as are proper to be done by good wives: If she have brought up children: he does not say, If she have borne children (children are a heritage of the Lord), that depends on the will of God; but, if she had not children of her own, yet if she had brought up children. If she have lodged strangers, and washed the saints' feet; if she have been ready to give entertainment to good Christians and good ministers, when they were in their travels for the spreading of the gospel. Washing of the feet o their friends was a part of their entertainments. If she have relieved the afflicted when she had ability, let her be relieved now. Observe, Those who would find mercy when they are in distress must show mercy when they are in prosperity.
IV.He cautions them to take heed of admitting into the number those who are likely to be no credit to them (Ti1 5:11):
The younger widows refuse: they will be weary of their employments in the church, and of living by rule, as they must do; so they will marry, and cast off their first faith. You read of a first love (Rev 2:4), and here of a first faith, that is, the engagements they gave to the church to behave well, and as became the trust reposed in them: it does not appear that by their first faith is meant their vow not to marry, for the scripture is very silent on that head; besides the apostle here advises the younger widows to marry (Ti1 5:14), which he would not if hereby they must have broken their vows. Dr. Whitby well observes, "If this faith referred to a promise made to the church not to marry, it could not be called their first faith." Withal they learn to be idle, and not only idle, but tattlers, etc., Ti1 5:13. Observe, It is seldom that those who are idle are idle only, they learn to be tattlers and busy-bodies, and to make mischief among neighbours, and sow discord among brethren. Those who had not attained to such a gravity of mind as was fit for the deaconesses (or the widows who were taken among the church's poor), let them marry, bear children, etc., Ti1 5:14. Observe, If housekeepers do not mind their business, but are tattlers, they give occasion to the adversaries of Christianity to reproach the Christian name, which, it seems, there were some instances of, Ti1 5:15. We learn hence,
1.In the primitive church there was care taken of poor widows, and provision made for them; and the churches of Christ in these days should follow so good an example, as far as they are able.
2.In the distribution of the church's charity, or alms, great care is to be taken that those share in the public bounty who most want it and best deserve it. A widow was not to be taken into the primitive church that had relations who were able to maintain her, or who was not well reported of for good works, but lived in pleasure: But the younger widows refuse, for, when they have begun to wax wanton against Christ, they will marry.
3.The credit of religion, and the reputation of Christian churches, are very much concerned in the character and behaviour of those that are taken into any employment in the church, though of a lower nature (such as the business of deaconesses), or that receive alms of the church; if they do not behave well, but are tatlers and busy-bodies, they will give occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully.
4.Christianity obliges its professors to relieve their indigent friends, particularly poor widows, that the church may not be charged with them, that it may relieve those that are widows indeed: rich people should be ashamed to burden the church with their poor relations, when it is with difficulty that those are supplied who have no children or nephews, that is, grand-children, who are in a capacity to relieve them.
Historical interpretation
Seven Centuries of Reception
4 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
The apostle in his first Epistle to Timothy: "But if any take not care of his own, and especially of those of his own household, he denies the faith, and is worse than an infidel."
Many consider that their own virtue is sufficient for their salvation, and if they duly regulate their own life, that nothing further is wanting to save them. But in this they greatly err, which is proved by the example of him who buried his one talent, for he brought it back not diminished but entire, and just as it had been delivered to him. It is shown also by the blessed Paul, who says here, "If any one provide not for his own." The provision of which he speaks is universal, and relates to the soul as well as the body, since both are to be provided for.
"If any provide not for his own, and especially for those of his own house," that is, those who are nearly related to him, "he is worse than an infidel." And so says Isaiah, the chief of the Prophets, "Thou shalt not overlook thy kinsmen of thy own seed." For if a man deserts those who are united by ties of kindred and affinity, how shall he be affectionate towards others? Will it not have the appearance of vainglory, when benefiting others he slights his own relations, and does not provide for them? And what will be said, if instructing others, he neglects his own, though he has greater facilities; and a higher obligation to benefit them? Will it not be said, These Christians are affectionate indeed, who neglect their own relatives? "He is worse than an infidel." Wherefore? Because the latter, if he benefits not aliens, does not neglect his near kindred.
What is meant is this: The law of God and of nature is violated by him who provides not for his own family. But if he who provides not for them has denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel, where shall he be ranked who has injured his relatives? With whom shall he be placed? But how has he denied the faith? Even as it is said, "They profess that they know God, but in works they deny Him." What has God, in whom they believe, commanded? "Hide not thyself from thine own flesh." How does he then believe who thus denies God? Let those consider this, who to spare their wealth neglect their kindred. It was the design of God, in uniting us by the ties of kindred, to afford us many opportunities of doing good to one another. When therefore thou neglectest a duty which infidels perform, hast thou not denied the faith? For it is not faith merely to profess belief, but to do works worthy of faith. And it is possible in each particular to believe and not to believe.
Now God, our master, teaches two chief precepts: love of God and love of neighbor. In them one finds three objects for his love: God, himself and his neighbor. One who loves God is not wrong in loving himself. It follows, therefore, that he will be concerned also that his neighbor should love God, since he is told to love his neighbor as himself. And the same is true of his concern for his wife, his children, for the members of his household, and for all others, so far as is possible. And, for the same end, he will wish his neighbor to be concerned for him, if he happens to need that concern. For this reason he will be at peace, as far as in him lies, with all. In that peace he will live in ordered harmony. The basis of this order is the observance of two rules: first, to do no harm to anyone, and, second, to help everyone whenever possible. To begin with, therefore, one has a responsibility for his own household—obviously, both in the order of nature and in the framework of human society. He has easier and more immediate contact with them.
And these things command, so that they may be blameless. But if anyone does not provide for his own, especially for those of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.
And these things command. Do you see that Paul wants the matter to be as a law? For it does not permit abstaining from luxury as an achievement, but forbids it as a sin.
But if anyone does not provide for his own. For personal virtue alone would not be sufficient for salvation, unless one also cares for others. Concerning the widow, Paul says these things. He calls those related by family "own." For some are personal, like friends, but not necessarily family. Therefore, one must care for their own, especially for family members. Which the extravagant does not do, attending only to luxury.
especially for those of his household. He takes care of both his own and those close to him, not only attending to what is appropriate but also to himself, by cutting off passions. Thus Clement says in the seventh Hypotyposes: "He speaks of providence both concerning the soul and concerning the body."
he has denied the faith. And how does the one who wastes, and does not provide for both his own and his household, deny the faith? Because, it is said: "And from your own seed you shall not be despised." (Isa. 58:7) But if you see God and do not deny Him, yet transgress His laws, you have denied God Himself. For it is said that they acknowledge God in words, but deny Him by their deeds. (Titus 1:16) How then is he worse than an unbeliever? Because although the unbelievers do not provide for everybody, at least they do so for their relatives, being led by the law of nature.
Continue studying 1 Timothy 5:8 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
The Apostle Paul delivers a profound and challenging instruction in 1 Timothy 5:8, asserting the fundamental responsibility of believers to provide for their immediate family, particularly those within their own household. This verse posits that neglecting such a foundational duty is not merely a social failing but a spiritual betrayal, equating it to a denial of the Christian faith and deeming it a conduct worse than that of an unbeliever. It underscores that genuine faith manifests in practical, loving care for one's closest relations.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is strategically placed within Paul's broader instructions to Timothy regarding the proper administration and conduct within the Ephesian church. Chapter 5 specifically delves into the care of various demographic groups within the Christian community, with a significant portion dedicated to the proper treatment and support of widows (1 Timothy 5:3-16). Before outlining the church's role in supporting widows, Paul first establishes the primary responsibility of individual family members. This hierarchical approach ensures that the church's resources are reserved for those who genuinely lack familial support, emphasizing that personal and familial obligations precede communal church aid. The verse serves as a crucial prerequisite, setting the stage for the church's subsequent responsibilities by first defining the individual's.
Historical & Cultural Context
In the Greco-Roman world, the household (οἶκος, oikos) was the fundamental unit of society, encompassing not just immediate family but also extended relatives, servants, and dependents. Mutual support within the family was a deeply ingrained cultural expectation, often extending to caring for elderly parents or widowed relatives. Paul's exhortation here resonates with and elevates this societal norm, infusing it with Christian theological weight. For Christians, who were often perceived as forming new social units that transcended traditional family ties, it was crucial to demonstrate that their new allegiance to Christ did not negate, but rather strengthened, their natural familial duties. Neglecting these duties could bring disrepute upon the nascent Christian community and the Gospel message itself, making Paul's strong language understandable in this cultural milieu.
Key Themes
1 Timothy is rich with themes concerning sound doctrine, church order, and practical Christian living. 1 Timothy 5:8 contributes significantly to the theme of practical godliness, demonstrating that true faith is not merely intellectual assent but is evidenced by righteous conduct, particularly within the family unit. It reinforces the theme of stewardship, highlighting that believers are stewards of their resources and relationships, with a primary obligation to their household. Furthermore, it touches upon the credibility of the Gospel, implying that the integrity of the Christian witness is undermined when believers fail to uphold even common societal standards of care, let alone the higher standards of Christian love and responsibility. This aligns with Paul's broader concern for the church's reputation among outsiders, as seen in passages like 1 Timothy 3:7.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This verb means "to consider in advance," "to look out for beforehand," or "to make provision for." It implies a proactive, thoughtful, and sustained effort to meet needs, not merely a reactive or minimal response. It encompasses not just financial support but also foresight in planning for the well-being and security of one's family members, suggesting a holistic approach to care.
This word signifies "pertaining to self," "one's own," or "private." In this context, it emphasizes personal, direct responsibility. The phrase "his own" (τῶν ἰδίων, tōn idiōn) refers broadly to those for whom one has a natural and direct responsibility, implying dependents. The subsequent phrase "specially for those of his own house" (μάλιστα δὲ τῶν οἰκείων τοῦ οἴκου, malista de tōn oikeiōn tou oikou) clarifies and intensifies this, narrowing the focus to the immediate household members, underscoring the priority of this core unit.
This term means "disbelieving," "without Christian faith," or "unbelieving." It refers to someone who does not believe in Christ or the Gospel. Paul's comparison is stark: to neglect one's family is to fall below the standard of even those who do not profess faith in God, implying that even non-believers often recognize and fulfill this basic human obligation. This makes the Christian's failure even more reprehensible.
Verse Breakdown
"But if any provide not for his own"
This opening clause establishes a clear conditional statement, highlighting a potential failure in responsibility. "His own" refers to those for whom a person is naturally responsible, typically dependents or close relatives. The act of "providing" (from pronoéō) implies active, thoughtful, and ongoing care, encompassing material support, protection, and general welfare. The negative "not" underscores the severity of the omission.
"and specially for those of his own house"
This phrase intensifies and clarifies the scope of responsibility. "Specially" (μάλιστα, malista) emphasizes that while the general duty extends to "his own," the most critical and immediate focus is on the "household" (οἰκείων τοῦ οἴκου, oikeiōn tou oikou). This includes immediate family members—spouse, children, and potentially elderly parents or other direct dependents living under the same roof—for whom the individual has the most direct and undeniable obligation.
"he hath denied the faith"
This is a profound theological statement. Paul equates the failure to provide for one's family not merely with a social misstep or a lack of charity, but with a direct "denial of the faith" (ἀρνέομαι τὴν πίστιν, arnéomai tēn pístin). This suggests that genuine Christian faith is not merely intellectual or spiritual, but is inherently practical and ethical, manifesting in responsible and loving actions towards those closest to oneself. Such neglect betrays the very nature of the faith one professes.
"and is worse than an infidel"
This is a powerful and stinging indictment. An "infidel" (ápistos) is someone without Christian faith. Paul's statement implies that even non-believers often uphold the natural human duty to care for their families. For a Christian, who claims to possess a higher moral and spiritual standard through Christ, to fail in such a basic human and divine obligation is considered more egregious than the conduct of someone who makes no such claims. It brings shame upon the Gospel and undermines the credibility of one's profession of faith.
Literary Devices
Paul employs several potent literary devices in 1 Timothy 5:8 to convey the gravity of his message. The most prominent is Hyperbole, where he uses the strong statement "worse than an infidel" to emphasize the extreme nature of the offense. While not literally suggesting an unbeliever is morally superior in all aspects, the hyperbole effectively shocks the reader into recognizing the profound seriousness of neglecting familial duties within the Christian context. This is coupled with Stark Contrast, drawing a sharp distinction between the expected conduct of a believer and the behavior of an "infidel," highlighting the shame brought upon the faith by such neglect. The phrase "denied the faith" also functions as a form of Metonymy, where the practical failure to provide stands for a deeper spiritual deficiency or a betrayal of the very principles of Christian belief. The verse's structure itself, moving from a general principle to a specific application and then to a severe judgment, creates a powerful Rhetorical Climax, building intensity and leaving an indelible impression on the reader regarding the non-negotiable nature of this command.
Theological and Thematic Connections
The theological weight of 1 Timothy 5:8 is immense, linking practical familial responsibility directly to the authenticity of one's faith. It underscores the biblical principle that true faith is always active and demonstrable, not merely a passive belief system. Neglecting one's family is seen as a denial of the very essence of the Gospel, which calls believers to love, sacrifice, and practical service. This verse reinforces the concept of the family as the primary sphere of discipleship and ministry, where Christian virtues like love, diligence, and selflessness are first to be cultivated and displayed. It challenges the notion that spiritual devotion can exist in isolation from tangible, earthly duties, arguing instead that our most immediate responsibilities are often the truest tests of our spiritual maturity and commitment to Christ.
Reflection and Application
1 Timothy 5:8 serves as a powerful and enduring challenge to believers across all generations. It compels us to examine our priorities and ensure that our profession of faith is genuinely reflected in our practical care for our families. This provision extends beyond mere financial support to encompass emotional presence, spiritual guidance, physical care, and the investment of time and energy into the well-being of our household members. For parents, it underscores the sacred duty to nurture, educate, and disciple children in the ways of the Lord. For adult children, it may involve honoring and caring for aging parents. For spouses, it calls for mutual support and selfless devotion. This verse reminds us that the home is the first and most crucial mission field, and our faithfulness there is a testament to the transformative power of the Gospel. Neglecting these fundamental responsibilities not only harms our loved ones but also undermines our Christian witness and brings reproach upon the name of Christ. True faith is active, practical, and begins at home.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What does Paul mean by "worse than an infidel"?
When Paul states that neglecting one's family makes a believer "worse than an infidel," he is using a strong rhetorical device to emphasize the severity of the failure. An "infidel" (or unbeliever) is someone who does not profess faith in Christ. Paul's point is not that unbelievers are inherently morally superior in all aspects, but that even they often recognize and fulfill the basic human obligation to care for their families. For a Christian, who claims to have a higher moral standard and the indwelling Spirit of God, to fall short of this common human decency is a profound contradiction. It brings shame upon the Gospel and undermines the credibility of their Christian witness, making their failure more reprehensible than that of someone who makes no such claims of faith. It essentially says, "Even those who don't know God often do this; how much more should you, who claim to know Him!"
Does "provide" only mean financial support?
While financial support is certainly a significant component of "providing," the Greek word pronoéō (G4306) suggests a broader, more holistic sense of care. It means "to consider in advance," "to look out for beforehand," and "to make provision for." This encompasses not only material and financial needs but also emotional, spiritual, and physical well-being. It implies foresight, active effort, and a commitment to the overall welfare of one's family members. This could include providing a safe home, ensuring education, offering emotional support, giving spiritual guidance, and investing time and presence. The emphasis is on proactive, comprehensive care for the needs of the household, reflecting a deep commitment to their flourishing.
How does this verse apply to single individuals or those without immediate family?
While the primary application of 1 Timothy 5:8 is to those with direct familial dependents, the underlying principle of responsible care and stewardship extends to all believers. For single individuals or those without immediate family, the "household of faith" becomes a significant sphere of application. The broader context of 1 Timothy 5 discusses the church's responsibility to care for its members, particularly widows. While direct familial provision may not apply, the principle of actively caring for "one's own" can be interpreted as a call to contribute to the well-being of the Christian community and those for whom one has a clear responsibility, whether through spiritual care, practical assistance, or financial support where appropriate. The spirit of the command is to ensure that those for whom we are responsible are not neglected.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
While 1 Timothy 5:8 directly addresses the believer's responsibility to their earthly family, its profound theological implications find their ultimate fulfillment and perfect example in Christ. Jesus, as the Son of God, perfectly fulfilled the divine mandate to "provide" for His own—His disciples, His church, and ultimately all who would believe in Him. He did not merely offer spiritual platitudes but actively provided for their physical needs, feeding the multitudes (Matthew 14:13-21), healing the sick (Luke 4:40), and even ensuring His mother's care from the cross (John 19:26-27). More profoundly, Christ provided for our deepest spiritual needs, offering Himself as the ultimate sacrifice to atone for our sins, thereby securing our eternal provision and salvation (John 3:16). His entire life and ministry were characterized by selfless provision, culminating in His death and resurrection, through which He established a new household of faith, the Church, for whom He continues to intercede and provide as our great High Priest (Hebrews 7:25). Thus, our call to provide for our families is a reflection of Christ's own perfect provision, a tangible outworking of the love and self-sacrifice that defines His relationship with His "own."