Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
For I have told him that I will judge his house for ever for the iniquity which he knoweth; because his sons made themselves vile, and he restrained them not.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
For I have told H5046 him that I will judge H8199 his house H1004 for H5704 ever H5769 for the iniquity H5771 which he knoweth H3045; because his sons H1121 made themselves vile H7043, and he restrained H3543 them not.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
For I have told him that I will execute judgment against his family forever, because of his wickedness in not rebuking his sons, even though he knew that they had brought a curse on themselves.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
I told him that I would judge his house forever for the iniquity of which he knows, because his sons blasphemed God and he did not restrain them.
Ask
American Standard Version
For I have told him that I will judge his house for ever, for the iniquity which he knew, because his sons did bring a curse upon themselves, and he restrained them not.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
For I have told him that I will judge his house forever, for the iniquity which he knew, because his sons brought a curse on themselves, and he didn’t restrain them.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And I haue tolde him that I will iudge his house for euer, for the iniquitie which hee knoweth, because his sonnes ranne into a slaunder, and he stayed them not.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and I have declared to him that I am judging his house--to the age, for the iniquity which he hath known, for his sons are making themselves vile, and he hath not restrained them,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 7,290 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Samuel 3:13 records God's solemn declaration to young Samuel, revealing the impending and permanent judgment upon the house of Eli, the high priest. This divine decree is a direct consequence of Eli's profound failure to decisively restrain his sons, Hophni and Phinehas, from their egregious and contemptuous sins committed against the Lord and His sacred worship, despite Eli's full knowledge of their wickedness. This pivotal message marks the formal inauguration of Samuel's prophetic ministry and signals the definitive end of Eli's priestly lineage, thereby ushering in a new era of spiritual leadership for Israel.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse serves as the climactic divine pronouncement within the narrative of Samuel's prophetic call, specifically following God's repeated summons to Samuel in the night. It directly confirms and elaborates upon an earlier, anonymous prophetic word delivered to Eli in 1 Samuel 2:27-36, which foretold the downfall of his priestly line. God's deliberate decision to reveal this severe judgment through Samuel, rather than directly to Eli, profoundly underscores the transfer of divine favor and authority from the corrupt high priest to the budding prophet. The immediate preceding verses, 1 Samuel 3:11-12, emphasize the terrifying severity and absolute finality of the judgment, stating that it would cause the ears of all who heard it to tingle, and that God would accomplish all He had spoken against Eli's house from beginning to end, leaving no room for reversal or mitigation.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: The period of the Judges, leading into the early monarchy, was characterized by profound spiritual and moral decline in Israel, famously summarized by the phrase, "everyone did what was right in his own eyes" (Judges 21:25). Eli served as both high priest and judge at Shiloh, which was the central place of worship where the Tabernacle and the Ark of the Covenant resided. The high priesthood was a hereditary office, passed down through Aaron's line, making Eli's failure particularly egregious as it defiled the very core of Israel's covenant relationship with God. Culturally, parental authority was paramount, and a father, especially one in a leadership position, was expected to maintain order, enforce righteousness, and uphold moral standards within his household and the broader community. Eli's sons' actions—taking sacrificial meat unlawfully, despising the Lord's offerings, and engaging in sexual immorality at the Tabernacle entrance (1 Samuel 2:12-17, 1 Samuel 2:22)—were not merely personal sins but public acts of contempt that undermined the sanctity of worship and led the people to despise the Lord's sacrifices.

  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in 1 Samuel and beyond. It highlights the theme of divine judgment and justice, emphasizing God's unwavering holiness and His absolute intolerance for sin, particularly when it defiles sacred things and leadership roles. It underscores the profound accountability of leadership, both parental and spiritual, demonstrating that those in positions of authority are held to a higher standard and that their inaction can be as culpable as direct transgression. The theme of consequences of inaction is central, as Eli's passive approach to his sons' wickedness leads directly to the downfall of his entire lineage. Furthermore, it foreshadows the transition of spiritual authority from a corrupt, failing system under Eli to a new, righteous leadership embodied by Samuel, preparing the way for the establishment of the monarchy and a renewed emphasis on prophetic guidance. God's declaration that Eli's house would be judged "for ever" (1 Samuel 3:13) demonstrates the severity of dishonoring God, as previously stated in 1 Samuel 2:30.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Vile (Hebrew, qâlal', H7043): The KJV phrase "made themselves vile" translates the Niphal participle of the Hebrew root קָלַל (qâlal'), which fundamentally means "to be light," "to be trifling," or "to be despised/cursed." In the context of Eli's sons, it signifies that their actions not only brought contempt upon themselves but, more critically, they treated God and His sacred offerings with utter disrespect, disdain, and levity. They made themselves contemptible in God's eyes and brought a curse upon the holy things they handled, essentially despising the Lord and His worship.
  • Knoweth (Hebrew, yâdaʻ', H3045): The word "knoweth" comes from the Hebrew root יָדַע (yâdaʻ'), meaning "to know" (properly, to ascertain by seeing), and extending to comprehend, be aware, or even acknowledge. This highlights Eli's direct culpability: his sin was not one of ignorance but of full, conscious awareness. He knew the extent of his sons' wicked deeds and their contempt for God's law and sacred worship, yet he failed to act decisively. His knowledge makes his passivity a grave offense in God's sight, as it implies a deliberate choice not to intervene.
  • Restrained them not (Hebrew, kâhâh', H3543): The phrase "he restrained them not" comes from the Hebrew root כָּהָה (kâhâh'), meaning "to be weak," "to grow dull," or "to rebuke." In this context, it implies that Eli's efforts to correct his sons were feeble, ineffective, or lacked the necessary force and follow-through. While he did offer some verbal rebuke (1 Samuel 2:23-25), it was not sufficient to compel obedience, remove them from their positions, or prevent their abuses. The emphasis is on his failure to apply decisive and authoritative discipline, allowing their sin to continue unchecked.

Verse Breakdown

  • "For I have told him that I will judge his house for ever": This opening clause establishes the divine authority and the prior warning. God's judgment is not a new, impulsive decision but a fulfillment of a prior prophecy, specifically the one delivered by the man of God in 1 Samuel 2:27-36. The phrase "for ever" emphasizes the permanence and finality of this divine decree against Eli's lineage, signifying that his priestly line would be definitively cut off and would not endure in its sacred office.
  • "for the iniquity which he knoweth;": This crucial phrase highlights Eli's direct and personal culpability. His sin was not one of ignorance but of complicity through inaction. He possessed full, undeniable knowledge of his sons' wicked deeds and their profound contempt for God's law and sacred worship, yet he failed to take appropriate, decisive measures to stop them. His awareness of their sin makes his passivity a grave offense in God's sight, demonstrating a profound dereliction of his duty as both father and high priest.
  • "because his sons made themselves vile,": This part specifies the nature of the sons' egregious sin. They engaged in actions that were not only morally corrupt but also deeply disrespectful, contemptuous, and sacrilegious towards God and the holy sacrifices. Their conduct brought profound disgrace upon the priesthood and the very worship of Yahweh, treating sacred things as common and despised, thereby demonstrating a shocking disregard for divine holiness.
  • "and he restrained them not.": This final clause pinpoints Eli's specific, damning failure. Despite his full knowledge of their vile behavior and his position of supreme authority as both father and high priest, he did not exercise the necessary discipline, nor did he remove them from their positions of sacred service. His lack of decisive intervention in the face of such blatant and public sin was a profound dereliction of his duty, which God viewed as honoring his sons more than God Himself (1 Samuel 2:29).

Literary Devices

The verse employs several potent literary devices to convey its powerful and somber message. Foreshadowing is prominently featured, as God's declaration through Samuel confirms the impending downfall of Eli's house, a prophecy that will be dramatically and tragically fulfilled later in the book (e.g., 1 Samuel 4:11). There is a strong sense of divine speech and authoritative pronouncement, as the words are directly attributed to God, lending immense weight, infallibility, and finality to the judgment. An element of profound irony is present: Eli, the high priest, whose very role was to uphold the sanctity and holiness of God's worship, is condemned for failing to do so within his own family, thereby allowing the defilement of the sacred space and practices under his watch. The structure of the verse also presents a clear cause-and-effect relationship, explicitly linking Eli's inaction (the effect of his negligence) to his sons' vileness (the direct cause of their sin) and ultimately to God's severe and irreversible judgment (the inevitable consequence).

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Samuel 3:13 powerfully illustrates God's unyielding holiness and His absolute demand for integrity, especially from those who represent Him and hold positions of spiritual authority. It reveals that God holds leaders, whether in the family, the church, or the community, profoundly accountable for their stewardship of authority and their decisive response to sin within their sphere of influence. Eli's tragic failure demonstrates unequivocally that inaction in the face of known wickedness is not neutrality but a profound form of complicity that deeply dishonors God and inevitably invites divine judgment. This principle underscores that God's justice is not only for overt transgression but also for the passive neglect of duty, particularly when such neglect compromises the purity of worship and leads others astray.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

1 Samuel 3:13 serves as a profound warning and a compelling call to diligent responsibility for all believers, particularly those entrusted with positions of leadership within families, churches, or communities. It compels us to undertake a rigorous examination of our own lives: Are we actively confronting sin, both personally and within our spheres of influence, or are we passively allowing compromise and corruption to fester? For parents, it underscores the sacred and non-negotiable duty to discipline and guide children in the ways of the Lord, understanding that true love involves establishing firm boundaries, consistent correction, and spiritual instruction. For spiritual leaders, it highlights the solemn and weighty obligation to uphold God's holy standards, maintain the sanctity and purity of worship, and address sin decisively and proactively within the flock, remembering always that God's honor is paramount. This verse powerfully reminds us that God is holy and just, and while His mercy is vast and boundless, His holiness demands accountability. Our inaction in the face of known sin can be as detrimental and culpable as active rebellion, incurring His displeasure and potentially leading to severe, far-reaching consequences for ourselves and for those under our care.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what specific areas of my life or influence might I be passively allowing sin to persist, rather than actively "restraining" it with the wisdom and courage God provides?
  • How seriously do I take my responsibility to uphold God's standards and promote righteousness in my home, church, or broader community?
  • What profound lessons does Eli's tragic failure teach me about the essential balance between grace and firm discipline in raising children or leading others in spiritual matters?
  • How can I cultivate a deeper, more consistent reverence for God's holiness in my daily life, in my decisions, and in my approach to corporate worship?

FAQ

What was the specific "iniquity" of Eli's sons that led to such severe judgment?

Answer: Eli's sons, Hophni and Phinehas, were priests who committed egregious sins that directly defiled the worship of God and brought profound contempt upon His holy name. Specifically, they flagrantly abused their priestly office by taking sacrificial portions unlawfully before they were offered to God, thereby despising the Lord's offerings (1 Samuel 2:12-17). Furthermore, they engaged in blatant sexual immorality with women who served at the entrance of the Tabernacle (1 Samuel 2:22). These actions were not merely personal failings but public acts of desecration that corrupted the sacred rituals, undermined the covenant, and led the people to treat the Lord's sacrifices lightly, ultimately dishonoring God Himself.

Why was Eli held accountable if his sons were the ones committing the sins?

Answer: Eli was held accountable because, as both high priest and father, he possessed the supreme authority and responsibility to intervene decisively, yet he failed to "restrain them not" despite his full and explicit knowledge of their wickedness. God explicitly states that Eli's house would be judged "for the iniquity which he knoweth" (1 Samuel 3:13). While he did offer some verbal rebuke (1 Samuel 2:23-25), it lacked the necessary authority, force, and follow-through to remove them from their positions or compel their obedience. God viewed his inaction as honoring his sons more than God Himself (1 Samuel 2:29), demonstrating that a leader's failure to confront and correct sin within their sphere of influence is a grave offense that incurs divine displeasure.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The tragic failure of Eli, the high priest, and his sons in 1 Samuel 3:13 powerfully foreshadows the desperate and profound need for a perfect High Priest and a righteous King. Eli's inability to "restrain" sin and his sons' contemptuous defilement of God's worship highlight humanity's inherent inability to perfectly uphold God's holy standards or to truly atone for sin. In stark and glorious contrast stands Jesus Christ, our ultimate High Priest, who is "holy, innocent, unstained, separated from sinners, and exalted above the heavens" (Hebrews 7:26). Unlike Eli's sons who brought contempt upon the sacrifices, Jesus offered Himself as the perfect, unblemished Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, a sacrifice that truly atones and never needs repeating, being a "once for all" offering (Hebrews 9:26). Where Eli failed to exercise decisive authority against sin, Jesus exercises perfect and sovereign authority, not only confronting sin but also conquering its power and dominion through His death and resurrection, offering complete forgiveness and new life to all who believe (Colossians 2:13-14). He is the one who truly "restrains" the power of sin and death, establishing a new covenant where God's law is written on hearts, and His people are empowered by the Holy Spirit to live in obedience, unlike the disobedient sons of Eli (Jeremiah 31:33). Jesus fulfills the priestly role perfectly, not through a flawed human lineage, but by His eternal divine nature, ensuring that God's holiness is perfectly honored and His people are perfectly represented before Him, granting us confident access to the throne of grace (Hebrews 4:14-16).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Samuel 3 verses 11–18

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Here is, I. The message which, after all this introduction, God delivered to Samuel concerning Eli's house. God did not come to him now to tell him how great a man he should be in his day, what a figure he should make, and what a blessing he should be in Israel. Young people have commonly a great curiosity to be told their fortune, but God came to Samuel, not to gratify his curiosity, but to employ him in his service and send him on an errand to another person, which was much better; and yet the matter of this first message, which no doubt made a very great impression upon him, might be of good use to him afterwards, when his own sons proved, though not so bad as Eli's, yet not so good as they should have been, Sa1 8:3. The message is short, not nearly so long as that which the man of God brought, Sa1 2:27. For, Samuel being a child, it could not be expected that he should remember a long message, and God considered his frame. The memories of children must not be overcharged, no, not with divine things. But it is a sad message, a message of wrath, to ratify the message in the former chapter, and to bind on the sentence there pronounced, because perhaps Eli did not give so much regard to that as he ought to have done. Divine threatenings, the less they are heeded, the surer they will come and the heavier they will fall. Reference is here had to what was there said concerning both the sin and the punishment.

1.Concerning the sin: it is the iniquity that he knoweth, Sa1 3:13. The man of God told him of it, and many a time his own conscience had told him of it. O what a great deal of guilt and corruption is there in us concerning which we may say, "It is the iniquity which our own heart knoweth, we are conscious to ourselves of it!" In short, the iniquity was this: His sons made themselves vile, and he restrained them not. Or, as it is in the Hebrew, he frowned not upon them. If he did show his dislike of their wicked courses, yet not to that degree that he ought to have done: he did reprove them, but he did not punish them, for the mischief they did, nor deprive them of their power to do mischief, which as a father, high priest, and judge, he might have done. Note, (1.) Sinners do by their own wickedness make themselves vile. They debauch themselves (for every man is tempted when he is drawn aside of his own lusts, Jam 1:14) and thereby they debase themselves, and make themselves not only mean, but odious to the holy God and holy men and angels. Sin is a vile thing, and degrades men more than any thing, Psa 15:4. Eli's sons made light of God, and made his offerings vile in the people's eyes; but the shame returned into their own bosom: they made themselves vile. (2.) Those that do not restrain the sins of others, when it is in the power of their hand to do it, make themselves partakers of the guilt, and will be charged as accessaries: Those in authority will have a great deal to answer for if they make not the sword they bear a terror to evil workers.

2.Concerning the punishment: it is that which I have spoken concerning his house, Sa1 3:12 and Sa1 3:13. I have told him that I will judge his house for ever, that is, that a curse should be entailed upon his family from generation to generation. The particulars of this curse we had before; they are not here repeated, but it is added, (1.) That when that sentence began to be executed it would be very dreadful and amazing to all Israel (Sa1 3:11): Both the ears of every one that hears it shall tingle. Every Israelite would be struck with terror and astonishment to hear of the slaying of Eli's sons, the breaking of Eli's neck, and the dispersion of Eli's family. Lord, how terrible art thou in thy judgments! If this be done in a green tree, what shall be done in the dry? Note, God's judgments upon others should affect us with a holy fear, Psa 119:120. (2.) That these direful first-fruits of the execution would be certain earnests of the progress and full accomplishment of it: When I begin I will proceed and make an end of all that I have threatened, Sa1 3:12. It is intimated that it might possibly be some time before he would begin, but let them not call that forbearance an acquittance, nor that reprieve a pardon; for when at length he does begin he will make thorough work of it, and, though he stay long, he will strike home. (3.) That no room should be left for hope that this sentence might be reversed and the execution stayed or mitigated, Sa1 3:14. [1.] God would not revoke the sentence, for he backed it with an oath: I have sworn to the house of Eli; and God will not go back from what he has sworn either in mercy or judgment. [2.] He would never come to a composition for the forfeiture: "The iniquity of Eli's house shall not be purged with sacrifice nor offering for ever. No atonement shall be made for the sin, nor any abatement of the punishment." This was the imperfection of the legal sacrifices, that there were iniquities which they did not reach, which they would not purge; but the blood of Christ cleanseth from all sin, and secures all those that by faith are interested in it from that eternal death which is the wages of sin.

II. The delivery of this message to Eli. Observe,

1.Samuel's modest concealment of it, Sa1 3:15. (1.) He lay till the morning, and we may well suppose he lay awake pondering on what he had heard, repeating it to himself, and considering what use he must make of it. After we have received the spiritual food of God's word, it is good to compose ourselves, and give it time to digest. (2.) He opened the doors of the house of the Lord, in the morning, as he used to do, being up first in the tabernacle. That he should do so at other times was an instance of extraordinary towardliness in a child, but that he should do so this morning was an instance of great humility. God had highly honoured him above all the children of his people, yet he was not proud of the honour, nor puffed up with it, did not think himself too great and too good to be employed in these mean and servile offices, but, as cheerfully as ever, went and opened the doors of the tabernacle. Note, Those to whom God manifests himself he makes and keeps low in their own eyes, and willing to stoop to any thing by which they may be serviceable to his glory, though but as door-keepers in his house. One would have expected that Samuel would be so full of his vision as to forget his ordinary service, that he would go among his companions, as one in an ecstasy, to tell them what converse he had had with God this night; but he modestly keeps it to himself, tells the vision to no man, but silently goes on in his business. Our secret communion with God is not to be proclaimed upon the house-tops. (3.) He feared to show Eli the vision. If he was afraid Eli would be angry with him and chide him, then we have cause to suspect that Eli used to be as severe with this towardly child as he was indulgent to his own wicked sons, and this will bear hard upon him. But we will suppose it was rather because he was afraid to grieve and trouble the good old man that he was so shy. If he had run immediately with the tidings to Eli, this would have looked as if he desired the woeful day and hoped to build his own family upon the ruin of Eli's; therefore it became him not to be forward to declare the vision. No good man can take pleasure in bringing evil tidings, especially not Samuel to Eli, the pupil to the tutor whom he loves and honours.

2.Eli's careful enquiry into it, Sa1 3:16, Sa1 3:17. As soon as ever he heard Samuel stirring he called for him, probably to his bed-side; and, having before perceived that God had spoken to him, he obliged him, not only by importunity (I pray thee, hide it not from me), but, finding him timorous and backward, by an adjuration likewise - God do so to thee, and more also, if thou hide any thing from me! He had reason enough to fear that the message prophesied no good concerning him, but evil; and yet, because it was a message from God, he could not contentedly be ignorant of it. A good man desires to be acquainted with all the will of God, whether it make for him or against him. His adjuration - God do so to thee, if thou hide any thing from me - may intimate the fearful doom of unfaithful watchmen; if they warn not sinners, they bring upon themselves that wrath and curse which they should have denounced, in God's name, against those that go on still in their trespasses.

3.Samuel's faithful delivery of his message at last (Sa1 3:18): He told him every whit. When he saw that he must tell him he never minced the matter, nor offered to make it better than it was, to blunt that which was sharp, or to gild the bitter pill, but delivered the message as plainly and fully as he received it, not shunning to declare the whole counsel of God. Christ's ministers must deal thus faithfully.

4.Eli's pious acquiescence in it. He did not question Samuel's integrity, was not cross with him, nor had he any thing to object against the equity of the sentence. He did not complain of the punishment, as Cain did, that it was greater than he either deserved or could bear, but patiently submitted, and accepted the punishment of his iniquity. It is the Lord, let him do what seemeth him good. He understood the sentence to intend only a temporal punishment, and the entail of disgrace and poverty upon his posterity, and not a final separation of them from the favour of God, and therefore he cheerfully submitted, did not repine, because he knew the demerits of his family; nor did he now intercede for the reversing of the sentence, because God had ratified it with a solemn oath, of which he would not repent. He therefore composes himself into a humble resignation to God's will, as Aaron, in a case not much unlike. Lev 10:3, He held his peace. In a few words, (1.) He lays down this satisfying truth, "It is the Lord; it is he that pronounces the judgment, from whose bar there lies no appeal and against whose sentence there lies no exception. It is he that will execute the judgment, whose power cannot be resisted, his justice arraigned, nor his sovereignty contested. It is the Lord, who will thus sanctify and glorify himself, and it is highly fit he should. It is the Lord, with whom there is no unrighteousness, who never did nor ever will do any wrong to any of his creatures, nor exact more than their iniquity deserves." (2.) He infers from it this satisfying conclusion: "Let him do what seemeth him good. I have nothing to say against his proceedings. He is righteous in all his ways and holy in all his works, and therefore his will be done. I will bear the indignation of the Lord, because I have sinned against him." Thus we ought to quiet ourselves under God's rebuke, and never to strive with our Maker.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 11–18. Public domain.
Copy as
Basil of CaesareaAD 379
THE LONG RULES 28
Benevolence to such persons is like that mistaken kindness of Eli which he was accused of showing his sons, contrary to the good pleasure of God. A feigned kindness to the wicked is a betrayal of the truth, an act of treachery to the community and a means of habituating oneself to indifference to evil.
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on Acts 8
Tell me, if I had bid you contribute your money, would not each one of you readily cast in according to his ability? If you saw me in extreme danger, would you not, if it had been possible, have cut off your own flesh to give me? Well, I am in danger now, and in great danger, such indeed that, were I withal confined to a dungeon, or had I received ten thousand stripes, or were a convict in the mines, I could not suffer more. Reach me then the hand. Consider how great is the danger, that I should not have been able to reform this which is least: I say "least" in regard to the labor required. What shall I have to say hereafter, when thus called to account? "Why did you not remonstrate? why did you not enjoin? why did you not lay the law before them? why did you not check the disobedient?" It will not be enough for me to say, that I did admonish. It will be answered, "You ought to have used more vehement rebuke; since Eli also admonished." But God forbid I should compare you with Eli's sons. Indeed, he did admonish them and say, "Nay, my sons, do not so; evil is the report that I hear of you." But subsequently the Scripture saith, that he did not admonish his sons: since he did not admonish them severely, or with threats.
John ChrysostomAD 407
HOMILIES ON THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW 17.6
For no one of those who are now rich will stand up for me there when I am called to account and accused, as not having thoroughly vindicated the laws of God with all due earnestness. For this is what ruined that admirable old man, though the way he lived his own life provided no reason for blame: yet for all that, because he overlooked the treading under foot of God’s laws he was chastised with his children and paid that grievous penalty. And if, where the absolute authority of nature was so great, he who failed to treat his own children with due firmness endured so grievous a punishment; what indulgence shall we have, freed as we are from that dominion and yet ruining all by flattery?
Isaac of NinevehAD 700
ASCETICAL HOMILIES 10
For what reason did wrath and death come upon the house of the priest Eli, the righteous elder who was eminent for forty years in his priesthood? Was it not because of the iniquity of his sons [Hophni] and [Phinehas]? For neither did he sin, nor did they with his assent, but it was because he did not have the zeal to demand from them the Lord’s vindication and he loved them more than the statutes of the Lord. Lest someone surmise that the Lord manifests His wrath only upon those who pass all the days of their life in iniquities, behold how for this unseemly sin He manifests His zeal against His genuine servants, against priests, judges, rulers, men consecrated to Him, to whom He entrusted the working of miracles, and He in no wise overlooks their transgression of His statutes.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Samuel 3:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.