Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
¶ Then David went over to the other side, and stood on the top of an hill afar off; a great space being between them:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Then David H1732 went over H5674 to the other side H5676, and stood H5975 on the top H7218 of an hill H2022 afar off H7350; a great H7227 space H4725 being between them:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
David crossed to the other side and climbed to the top of the distant ridge, leaving a considerable space between them.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Then David crossed to the other side and stood atop the mountain at a distance; there was a wide gulf between them.
Ask
American Standard Version
Then David went over to the other side, and stood on the top of the mountain afar off; a great space being between them;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Then David went over to the other side, and stood on the top of the mountain afar off; a great space being between them;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then Dauid went vnto the other side, and stoode on the toppe of an hill a farre off, a great space being betweene them.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And David passeth over to the other side, and standeth on the top of the hill afar off--great is the place between them;
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 7,919 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Samuel 26:13 describes David's calculated and strategic withdrawal from King Saul's camp after his second demonstration of unwavering mercy. Having secretly infiltrated Saul's sleeping encampment and taken his spear and water jug as irrefutable proof of his presence and restraint, David deliberately positions himself on a distant hilltop. This act of establishing a "great space" between himself and Saul's forces was a crucial maneuver, ensuring his safety and setting the stage for a public confrontation that would powerfully demonstrate David's prudence, his profound respect for God's anointed, and his deep trust in divine justice.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: The book of 1 Samuel meticulously chronicles the tumultuous transition from the era of the judges to the establishment of the monarchy in Israel, with a primary focus on the intertwined reigns of Saul and David. This particular passage, found within 1 Samuel 26, marks the second significant occasion where David has a clear opportunity to kill King Saul but conscientiously chooses not to. The first such instance occurred in 1 Samuel 24, where David cut off a corner of Saul's robe. Immediately preceding the narrative details David and Abishai's stealthy infiltration of Saul's sleeping camp, where they find the king utterly vulnerable. Despite Abishai's fervent urging to strike Saul down, David firmly refuses, declaring his refusal to harm "the Lord's anointed" (1 Samuel 26:9). Instead, he takes Saul's spear and water jug, not as weapons, but as silent, undeniable proof of his presence and his remarkable restraint (1 Samuel 26:11-12). Verse 13 then describes David's immediate, calculated withdrawal to a safe and elevated distance, meticulously setting the stage for his subsequent public confrontation with Saul and his commander, Abner, which unfolds dramatically in the verses that follow (1 Samuel 26:14-25).
  • Historical & Cultural Context: This event transpires during a highly volatile period in Israel's nascent monarchy. King Saul, consumed by an escalating paranoia and debilitating jealousy, relentlessly pursued David, whom he perceived as a direct threat to his throne, despite David's unwavering loyalty. David, though already privately anointed by Samuel as the future king, was forced to live as a fugitive, constantly on the run with a loyal, albeit small, band of followers. The setting for this episode is the wilderness of Ziph, a rugged, desolate, and often treacherous region within Judah. This terrain provided both a natural refuge for David's nomadic existence and significant challenges for his survival. Military encampments of this ancient era were typically less fortified than modern ones, often consisting of tents or makeshift shelters, making stealthy infiltration feasible, especially under the cloak of night. Culturally, the concept of "the Lord's anointed" (מְשִׁיחַ יְהוָה, meshiach Yahweh) carried immense theological and societal weight. It signified a person divinely chosen, consecrated, and set apart by God for a specific, sacred role, most notably a king or a high priest. To lay violent hands upon such a person, even one as wayward and malicious as Saul, was considered an egregious act against God Himself, a foundational principle deeply ingrained in Israelite theology and law. David's actions throughout this narrative powerfully reflect his profound reverence for this divine appointment, even when it placed his own life in extreme peril.
  • Key Themes: Several profound themes converge within 1 Samuel 26 and are particularly underscored by the actions described in verse 13. Firstly, the overarching theme of Divine Providence is strikingly evident, as Saul is explicitly stated to have been "delivered into David's hand" (1 Samuel 26:8), highlighting God's sovereign control over seemingly coincidental or circumstantial events. Secondly, David's unwavering Respect for God's Anointed stands paramount; despite Saul's relentless and malicious pursuit, David consistently refuses to harm the king, recognizing God's ultimate authority over His chosen ones (1 Samuel 26:9). This principle is a defining characteristic of David's integrity throughout his period of flight. Thirdly, David demonstrates profound Trust in Divine Justice, choosing to rely on God's ultimate vindication rather than taking vengeance into his own hands. He articulates his belief that God will ultimately judge Saul, whether through natural death, in battle, or by direct divine intervention (1 Samuel 26:10). Finally, David's Prudence and Strategic Wisdom are on full display as he meticulously calculates his movements, ensuring his personal safety and advantageous positioning before initiating a public confrontation. The "great space" he creates is not merely a physical distance but a strategic buffer, enabling clear communication without immediate threat, serving as a powerful testament to his practical leadership skills and discerning character.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Went over (Hebrew, ʻâbar', H5674): This primitive root signifies "to cross over" and is used very widely to denote any transition, whether literal or figurative. In this context, it emphasizes David's decisive and intentional movement, a deliberate act of crossing a boundary or a significant geographical feature to gain a strategic advantage. It highlights a purposeful transition from the covert act of infiltration to the overt act of public confrontation, but only after securing a safe and advantageous position.
  • Afar off (Hebrew, râchôwq', H7350): Derived from a root meaning "to be remote," this term describes a considerable distance, both literally and figuratively. Here, it underscores David's deliberate action of placing a significant physical gap between himself and Saul's camp. This "remoteness" conveys a sense of inaccessibility, emphasizing David's strategic foresight in ensuring his safety before engaging in a verbal challenge. It highlights the calculated nature of his withdrawal, ensuring no immediate reprisal.
  • Space (Hebrew, mâqôwm', H7227): Properly meaning "a standing" or "a spot," this word is used broadly to refer to a locality or place, and figuratively, a condition. When coupled with "great" (H7227, rab), it denotes a substantial and intentional separation. This "space" was not accidental but a meticulously created physical barrier, transforming a highly dangerous situation into one where David could speak freely without fear of immediate attack. It represents a strategic buffer, essential for the dramatic confrontation that was about to unfold.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Then David went over to the other side": This clause marks David's immediate, decisive, and calculated action following his stealthy infiltration of Saul's camp and his act of mercy. "Went over to the other side" implies a significant movement, perhaps crossing a wadi, a ridge, or some natural boundary, to gain a strategic advantage and establish a safe distance from Saul's sleeping army. It signifies a crucial transition from covert operation to a position from which he could initiate an overt, yet safe, confrontation.
  • "and stood on the top of an hill afar off;": This detail specifies David's chosen vantage point. Standing on a hilltop provided him with both a clear, commanding view of Saul's camp below and an elevated position from which his voice could carry across the distance. The phrase "afar off" reiterates the considerable separation, ensuring that any immediate pursuit or attack from Saul's men would be exceedingly difficult, if not impossible. This strategic elevation also subtly symbolizes David's moral high ground and his position of spiritual authority, even as a hunted fugitive.
  • "a great space [being] between them:": This final clause explicitly states the outcome and the strategic purpose of David's precise movements. The "great space" was a deliberate creation, a physical manifestation of the growing chasm between David's righteous conduct and Saul's unrighteous, paranoid pursuit. It served as a vital buffer, allowing David to publicly challenge Saul and Abner's negligence and Saul's injustice without putting himself in immediate peril. This physical separation was absolutely essential for the dramatic verbal confrontation that would immediately follow, enabling David's voice to be heard clearly while his person remained secure.

Literary Devices

The narrative of 1 Samuel 26:13 is richly imbued with literary devices that amplify its theological and dramatic impact. Irony is profoundly evident, as Saul, the reigning king with a vast army at his disposal, is depicted as vulnerable and asleep, while David, the hunted fugitive, is paradoxically the one who holds the power of life and death over the monarch. The stark contrast between David's merciful restraint and Saul's relentless, irrational pursuit underscores this deep irony. Symbolism also plays a crucial role: the "great space" David deliberately creates is not merely physical but powerfully symbolizes the widening moral and spiritual chasm between David's integrity and Saul's spiritual decline. David's ascent to the "top of an hill" can be interpreted as symbolic of his moral high ground and his eventual, divinely ordained ascent to the throne, standing in stark contrast to Saul's downward trajectory. The spear and water jug, taken as proof, serve as potent symbols of David's access to Saul and his remarkable restraint, providing undeniable evidence of Saul's negligence and David's profound mercy. Furthermore, the entire episode, particularly David's unwavering refusal to harm God's anointed, foreshadows the ultimate divine justice that will inevitably befall Saul, reinforcing David's deep trust that God will deal with his enemies in His own perfect time (1 Samuel 26:10). The narrative also masterfully employs contrast between David's calm, calculated wisdom and Saul's irrational, impulsive paranoia.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The strategic actions of David in 1 Samuel 26:13 resonate with profound and enduring theological truths. David's deliberate creation of distance before initiating a confrontation is a powerful testament to his reliance on divine wisdom and protection, rather than succumbing to impulsive retaliation or self-vindication. It beautifully illustrates the biblical principle that believers are called to exercise prudence, seek safety, and engage with discernment, even while standing firm in righteousness. His consistent refusal to harm Saul, despite repeated and clear opportunities, underscores a deep reverence for God's sovereignty over human authority and a profound, unwavering trust in God's ultimate justice. This passage teaches that true strength and spiritual maturity lie not in wielding power for personal vengeance, but in patiently waiting for God to act, entrusting Him with the vindication of the righteous and the judgment of the wicked. It highlights the timeless theological truth that God is the ultimate avenger, and His timing is always perfect and just.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

David's actions in 1 Samuel 26:13 offer timeless and profound wisdom for navigating conflict, injustice, and persecution in our own lives. In moments of intense pressure, unfair accusation, or active hostility, our natural human inclination might be to react impulsively, to seek immediate retribution, or to defend ourselves aggressively. However, David's remarkable example calls us to a significantly higher standard: to exercise strategic wisdom, to create necessary "space" for clear-headed engagement, and to prioritize safety and principled conduct over rash, emotional retaliation. This "space" can manifest in various forms—it might be physical distance, emotional detachment, or even a spiritual pause—allowing us to process difficult situations, seek divine guidance through prayer, and respond with discernment rather than raw, unchecked emotion. Furthermore, David's unwavering respect for God's anointed, even when that authority was deeply flawed, actively hostile, and seeking his life, profoundly challenges us to consider our own attitudes towards those in positions of power, both secular and spiritual. It serves as a powerful reminder that our ultimate trust is in God's sovereign hand to bring about justice and vindication, encouraging us to release our grip on personal vengeance and instead commit our cause fully to Him. This passage invites us to cultivate patience, prudence, and a deep, abiding reliance on divine justice in all our interactions, especially with adversaries.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what specific areas of your life do you need to create "space" (physical, emotional, or spiritual) before engaging in conflict or difficult conversations?
  • How can David's example of respecting flawed authority, while simultaneously trusting God for ultimate justice, inform your interactions with challenging leaders or unfair systems in your own context?
  • What does it practically mean to "leave vengeance to God" in your current circumstances, and how might embracing this principle shift your approach to those who have wronged you?

FAQ

Why didn't David just kill Saul when he had the chance?

Answer: David consistently refused to kill Saul because Saul was "the Lord's anointed" (1 Samuel 26:9). This was a profound and non-negotiable theological principle for David. He deeply believed that God had chosen Saul as king, and therefore, only God had the divine right to remove him from that position. To lay violent hands on Saul would be to usurp God's prerogative and act directly against divine will. David explicitly states his trust that God Himself would deal with Saul in His own way and time, whether through natural death, in battle, or by direct divine intervention (1 Samuel 26:10). This demonstrates David's deep reverence for God's sovereignty and his unwavering commitment to waiting on God's perfect timing for justice and vindication, a theme powerfully echoed in the New Testament's call to "leave room for God's wrath" and not take vengeance into our own hands (Romans 12:19).

What was the significance of taking Saul's spear and water jug?

Answer: Taking Saul's spear and water jug was a highly symbolic act with immense practical and communicative significance. The spear was not merely a weapon but a potent symbol of Saul's royal authority and military power, often carried by the king himself as a scepter or badge of office (1 Samuel 18:10). The water jug represented his personal sustenance, daily provision, and ultimate vulnerability. By taking these highly personal and symbolic items, David provided undeniable and irrefutable proof to Saul and his commander, Abner, that he had indeed been in their midst, had the perfect opportunity to kill the king, yet chose not to (1 Samuel 26:16). This act served multiple purposes: it publicly shamed Saul and Abner for their negligence in guarding the king, and more importantly, it powerfully vindicated David's character, demonstrating his mercy, his respect for God's anointed, and his non-violent intentions. It was a tangible, silent testimony to his integrity.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The narrative of David's remarkable restraint and strategic wisdom in 1 Samuel 26:13 finds its ultimate fulfillment and deeper theological meaning in the person and redemptive work of Jesus Christ. David, though a righteous king and a man after God's own heart, was still a fallen human being. Yet, his profound refusal to harm God's anointed, his patient endurance of unjust persecution, and his unwavering trust in divine justice powerfully foreshadow the perfect character and mission of the true and ultimate King, Jesus. Just as David was relentlessly pursued by a jealous Saul, Jesus, the perfect Son of God, was ceaselessly pursued, slandered, and ultimately crucified by those who rejected His rightful claim to the throne. Yet, like David, Jesus never retaliated against His adversaries. When reviled, He did not revile in return; when He suffered, He made no threats, but instead willingly entrusted Himself to Him who judges justly (1 Peter 2:23). The "great space" David created before confrontation can be seen as a type of the spiritual distance Jesus maintained from the world's sinful ways, even as He compassionately engaged with it, embodying a perfect righteousness that set Him utterly apart. Ultimately, Jesus, the true Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, did not seek vengeance on His enemies but willingly offered Himself as the ultimate, atoning sacrifice, establishing a new covenant through His shed blood. His glorious resurrection is the ultimate vindication, demonstrating God's perfect justice, His sovereign power over sin and death, and His ultimate authority over all things, far surpassing David's temporary reprieve from Saul. Through Christ, believers are called to a similar posture of non-retaliation, patient endurance, and absolute trust in God's perfect timing and ultimate judgment, knowing that all authority in heaven and on earth has been given to Him (Matthew 28:18).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Samuel 26 verses 13–20

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

David having got safely from Saul's camp himself, and having brought with him proofs sufficient that he had been there, posts himself conveniently, so that they might hear him and yet not reach him (Sa1 26:13), and then begins to reason with them upon what had passed.

I. He reasons ironically with Abner, and keenly banters him. David knew well that it was from the mighty power of God that Abner and the rest of the guards were cast into so deep a sleep, and that God's immediate hand was in it; but he reproaches Abner as unworthy to be captain of the lifeguards, since he could sleep when the king his master lay so much exposed. By this it appears that the hand of God locked them up in this deep sleep that, as soon as ever David had got out of danger, a very little thing awakened them, even David's voice at a great distance roused them, Sa1 26:14. Abner got up (we may suppose it early in a summer's morning) and enquired who called, and disturbed the king's repose. "It is I," says David, and then he upbraids him with his sleeping when he should have been upon his guard. Perhaps Abner, looking upon David as a despicable enemy and one that there was no danger from, had neglected to set a watch; however, he himself ought to have been more wakeful. David, to put him into confusion, told him, 1. That he had lost his honour (Sa1 26:15): "Art not thou a man? (so the word is), a man in office, that art bound, by the duty of thy place, to inspect the soldiery? Art not thou in reputation for a valiant man? So thou wouldst be esteemed, a man of such courage and conduct that there is none like thee; but now thou art shamed for ever. Thou a general! Thou, a sluggard!" 2. That he deserved to lose his head (Sa1 26:16): "You are all worthy to die, by martial law, for being off your guard, when you had the king himself asleep in the midst of you. Ecce signum - Behold this token. See where the king's spear is, in the hand of him whom the king himself is pleased to count his enemy. Those that took away this might as easily and safely have taken away his life. Now see who are the king's best friends, you that neglected him and left him exposed or I that protected him when he was exposed. You pursue me as worthy to die, and irritate Saul against me; but who is worthy to die now?" Note, Sometimes those that unjustly condemn others are justly left to fall into condemnation themselves.

II. He reasons seriously and affectionately with Saul. By this time he was so well awake as to hear what was said, and to discern who said it (Sa1 26:17): Is this thy voice, my son David? In the same manner he had expressed his relentings, Sa1 24:16. He had given his wife to another and yet calls him son, thirsted after his blood and yet is glad to hear his voice. Those are bad indeed that have never any convictions of good, nor ever sincerely utter good expressions. And now David has as fair an opportunity of reaching Saul's conscience as he had just now of taking away his life. This he lays hold on, though not of that, and enters into a close argument with him, concerning the trouble he still continued to give him, endeavouring to persuade him to let fall the prosecution and be reconciled.

1.He complains of the very melancholy condition he was brought into by the enmity of Saul against him. Two things he laments: - (1.) That he was driven from his master and from his business: "My lord pursues after his servant, Sa1 26:18. How gladly would I serve thee as formerly if my service might be accepted! but, instead of being owned as a servant, I am pursued as a rebel, and my lord is my enemy, and he whom I would follow with respect compels me to flee from him." (2.) That he was driven from his God and from his religion; and this was a much greater grievance than the former (Sa1 26:19): "They have driven me out from the inheritance of the Lord, have made Canaan too hot for me, at least the inhabited parts of it, have forced me into the deserts and mountains, and will, ere long, oblige me entirely to quit the country." And that which troubled him was not so much that he was driven out from his own inheritance as that he was driven out from the inheritance of the Lord, the holy land. It should be more comfortable to us to think of God's title to our estates and his interest in them then of our own, and that with them we may honour him then that with them we may maintain ourselves. Nor was it so much his trouble that he was constrained to live among strangers as that he was constrained to live among the worshippers of strange gods and was thereby thrust into temptation to join with them in their idolatrous worship. His enemies did, in effect, send him to go and serve other gods, and perhaps he had heard that some of them had spoken to that purport of him. Those that forbid our attendance on God's ordinances do what in them lies to estrange us from God and to make us heathens. If David had not been a man of extraordinary grace, and firmness to his religion, the ill usage he met with from his own prince and people, who were Israelites and worshippers of the true God, would have prejudiced him against the religion they professed and have driven him to communicate with idolaters. "If these be Israelites," he might have said, "let me live and die with Philistines;" and no thanks to them that their conduct had not that effect. We are to reckon that the greatest injury that can be done us which exposes us to sin. Of those who thus led David into temptation he here says, Cursed be they before the Lord. Those fall under a curse that thrust out those whom God receives, and send those to the devil who are dear to God.

2.He insists upon his own innocency: What have I done or what evil is in my hand? Sa1 26:18. He had the testimony of his conscience for him that he had never done nor ever designed any mischief to the person, honour, or government, of his prince, nor to any of the interests of his country. He had lately had Saul's own testimony concerning him (Sa1 24:17): Thou art more righteous than I. It was very unreasonable and wicked for Saul to pursue him as a criminal, when he could not charge him with any crime.

3.He endeavours to convince Saul that his pursuit of him is not only wrong, but mean, and much below him: "The king of Israel, whose dignity is great, and who has so much other work to do, has come out to seek a flea, as when one doth hunt a partridge in the mountains," Sa1 26:20 - a poor game for the king of Israel to pursue. He compares himself to a partridge, a vert innocent harmless bird, which, when attempts are made upon its life, flies if it can, but makes no resistance. And would Saul bring the flower of his army into the field only to hunt one poor partridge? What a disparagement was this to his honour! What a stain would it be on his memory to trample upon so weak and patient as well as so innocent an enemy! Jam 5:6, You have killed the just, and he doth not resist you.

4.He desires that the core of the controversy may be searched into and some proper method taken to bring it to an end, Sa1 26:19. Saul himself could not say that justice put him on thus to persecute David, or that he was obliged to do it for the public safety. David was not willing to say (though it was very true) that Saul's own envy and malice put him on to do it; and therefore he concludes it must be attributed either to the righteous judgment of God or to the unrighteous designs of evil men. Now, (1.) "If the Lord have stirred thee up against me, either in displeasure to me (taking this way to punish me for my sins against him, though, as to thee, I am guiltless) or in displeasure to thee, if it be the effect of that evil spirit from the Lord which troubles thee, let him accept an offering from us both - let us join in making our peace with God, reconciling ourselves to him, which may be done, by sacrifice; and then I hope the sin will be pardoned, whatever it is, and the trouble, which is so great a vexation both to thee and me, will come to an end." See the right method of peace-making; let us first make God our friend by Christ the great Sacrifice, and then all other enmities shall be slain, Eph 2:16; Pro 16:7. But, (2.) "If thou art incited to it by wicked men, that incense thee against me, cursed be they before the Lord," that is, they are very wicked people, and it is fit that they should be abandoned as such, and excluded from the king's court and councils. He decently lays the blame upon the evil counsellors who advised the king to that which was dishonourable and dishonest, and insists upon it that they be removed from about him and forbidden his presence, as men cursed before the Lord, and then he hoped he should gain his petition, which is (Sa1 26:20), "Let not my blood fall to the earth, as thou threatenest, for it is before the face of the Lord, who will take cognizance of the wrong and avenge it." Thus pathetically does David plead with Saul for his life, and, in order to that, for his favourable opinion of him.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 13–20. Public domain.
Copy as
BedeAD 735
Commentary on Samuel
And when David had passed over to the other side, etc. When Jesus had passed over from this world to the Father, and remained untroubled in the height of the Father's kingdom, clearly separated far from the sight of mortals, and there was a great distance between Him, immortal victor over death, sitting at the right hand of the Father in the flesh as God, and those who, being mortal, miserable, and impious in this world, endeavored to fight against Him; He cried out through His apostles, preaching to the people of Israel, and to its scribes, urging them to rise from the slumber of their harmful lethargy and to respond to Him by believing. For Abner, who is interpreted as the lamp of the Father, shows those who should have ministered the light of truth to the people at that time. His father Ner, who is translated as a lamp, typifies their teachers who preceded in spiritually kindling and showing the light of legal knowledge to them and the people.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Samuel 26:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.