1 Samuel 15:26

Translation
King James Version
And Samuel said unto Saul, I will not return with thee: for thou hast rejected the word of the LORD, and the LORD hath rejected thee from being king over Israel.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Samuel H8050 said H559 unto Saul H7586, I will not return H7725 with thee: for thou hast rejected H3988 the word H1697 of the LORD H3068, and the LORD H3068 hath rejected H3988 thee from being king H4428 over Israel H3478.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
But Sh'mu'el said to Sha'ul, "I will not go back with you, because you have rejected the word of ADONAI, and ADONAI has rejected you as king over Isra'el."
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
“I will not return with you,” Samuel replied. “For you have rejected the word of the LORD, and He has rejected you as king over Israel.”
Ask
American Standard Version
And Samuel said unto Saul, I will not return with thee; for thou hast rejected the word of Jehovah, and Jehovah hath rejected thee from being king over Israel.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Samuel said to Saul, “I will not return with you; for you have rejected the LORD’s word, and the LORD has rejected you from being king over Israel.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
But Samuel saide vnto Saul, I will not returne with thee: for thou hast cast away the word of the Lord, and the Lord hath cast away thee, that thou shalt not be King ouer Israel.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And Samuel saith unto Saul, `I do not turn back with thee; for thou hast rejected the word of Jehovah, and Jehovah doth reject thee from being king over Israel.'
Ask
See also
Hosea 4:61 Samuel 13:141 Samuel 16:12 John 1:11Jeremiah 6:191 Samuel 15:231 Samuel 15:31
See on the biblical-era map
Saul Destroys the Amalekites
Saul Destroys the Amalekites View full PDF
Saul and David
Saul and David View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 7,587 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Samuel 15:26 marks a definitive and somber turning point in the early monarchy of Israel, as the prophet Samuel delivers God's irrevocable verdict to King Saul. This verse encapsulates the severe consequences of Saul's partial obedience and outright rebellion against the explicit divine command to utterly destroy the Amalekites. Samuel's declaration underscores the profound principle of divine reciprocity: because Saul rejected the word of the LORD, God, in turn, decisively rejected Saul from his kingship over Israel, sealing his fate and setting the stage for a new era of leadership chosen by divine prerogative.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This pivotal verse concludes a dramatic and confrontational encounter between Samuel and King Saul, following Saul's mission against the Amalekites. The narrative begins with God's clear and unambiguous command to Saul to "utterly destroy all that they have" and "spare them not" from the Amalekites, a long-standing enemy of Israel, as detailed in 1 Samuel 15:3. However, Saul, under the guise of offering sacrifices to the LORD, demonstrably failed to execute this herem (devotion to destruction) command fully, sparing King Agag and the choicest of the livestock, as revealed in 1 Samuel 15:9. Samuel's arrival is prompted by God's profound lament over Saul's disobedience, expressed in 1 Samuel 15:10-11. The preceding verses, 1 Samuel 15:13-25, meticulously detail Saul's attempts to justify his actions—first by claiming complete obedience, then by shifting blame to the people, and finally by a reluctant admission of sin coupled with a plea for public honor. Samuel's famous and piercing rebuke, "To obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams," articulated in 1 Samuel 15:22, directly precedes this verse, establishing the theological framework for God's subsequent judgment. Verse 26 thus serves as the climactic and irrevocable pronouncement of judgment, confirming the termination of Saul's dynasty and his personal legitimate reign in God's eyes.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: Saul was Israel's inaugural king, divinely chosen and anointed through the prophet Samuel to lead the nascent nation against its enemies and to consolidate its identity amidst surrounding hostile kingdoms. The Amalekites were a particularly detestable and perennial enemy of Israel, notorious for their unprovoked attack on the vulnerable Israelites during their exodus from Egypt, as recounted in Exodus 17:8-16. God had explicitly commanded their utter destruction, a concept known as herem, which was a common practice in ancient Near Eastern warfare. This practice often involved the complete destruction of enemy populations and their possessions as an offering or dedication to one's patron deity, signifying absolute devotion and purity of purpose. Saul's failure to execute the herem fully, particularly his sparing of King Agag and the choicest animals, was not merely a tactical misstep or a minor transgression; it was a direct act of rebellion against God's explicit command and a profound violation of the sacred herem. In a culture where kingship was often perceived as a divine appointment, a king's foremost duty was to faithfully execute the will of his patron deity. Saul's actions, driven by a desire for plunder, self-aggrandizement, or popular approval rather than strict obedience to divine instruction, fundamentally demonstrated his unfitness for the divinely ordained office of king.

  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully articulates several core themes central to the book of 1 Samuel and the broader Old Testament narrative. Foremost is the theme of obedience versus sacrifice, where God unequivocally prioritizes complete and immediate submission to His revealed word over ritualistic performance, human-devised religious acts, or outward displays of piety. Saul's tragic downfall highlights the critical importance of divine authority and human accountability; even a divinely appointed king is ultimately subservient to the LORD's will and is held to account for his actions. The concept of divine sovereignty is also profoundly prominent, as God demonstrates His ultimate power to establish and remove kings according to His righteous judgment and perfect timing. Furthermore, the verse underscores the irreversibility of certain divine judgments once pronounced, particularly when they stem from persistent rebellion and a rejection of God's explicit commands. This definitive rejection of Saul sets the stage for the search for "a man after his own heart," as prophesied in 1 Samuel 13:14, foreshadowing the subsequent anointing of David in 1 Samuel 16.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Rejected (Hebrew, mâʼaç', H3988): The Hebrew verb מָאַס (mâʼaç), appearing twice in this verse, is crucial for understanding its profound theological weight. It means "to spurn," "to despise," "to abhor," "to refuse," or "to treat with contempt." Its repetition creates a powerful and chilling parallelism: Saul's act of despising or treating lightly God's explicit command directly results in God's reciprocal act of despising or rejecting Saul from his kingship. This is not merely a withdrawal of favor but an active, decisive, and often final repudiation, indicating that Saul's unfitness for the throne was rooted in his character and his profound disregard for divine authority.
  • Word (Hebrew, dâbâr', H1697): The Hebrew noun דָבָר (dâbâr) refers to "a word," but by implication, it encompasses a "matter," "thing," "affair," "commandment," or "decree." In this context, "the word of the LORD" signifies God's explicit, authoritative, and revealed command to Saul regarding the Amalekites. Saul's rejection was not of a mere suggestion but of God's direct and binding instruction, highlighting the seriousness of his disobedience as a contempt for the divine will itself.
  • LORD (Hebrew, Yᵉhôvâh', H3068): The Hebrew proper noun יְהֹוָה (Yᵉhôvâh) is the covenant name of God, often translated as "Jehovah" or "the Lord." It signifies the self-existent, eternal, and covenant-keeping God of Israel. The use of this specific name emphasizes that the command came from the sovereign God who had chosen and established Saul as king, and therefore, the rejection of Saul's kingship is a direct act of the supreme divine authority, not a mere human decision.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Samuel said unto Saul, I will not return with thee:" This opening clause signifies Samuel's definitive and symbolic break with Saul. Saul had just pleaded with Samuel to "return with me, that I may worship the LORD thy God" in 1 Samuel 15:25. Samuel's refusal is not merely a personal decision or an act of pique, but a prophetic act that underscores the irreversible nature of God's judgment. It marks the cessation of Samuel's active support, endorsement, and intercession for Saul's reign, signaling the finality of the divine decree and the end of any hope for reconciliation concerning the kingship.
  • "for thou hast rejected the word of the LORD," This is the divine charge against Saul, presented as the direct cause for the subsequent judgment. His sin was not merely partial obedience, a minor transgression, or a misunderstanding, but a fundamental "rejection" (מָאַס, mâʼaç) of God's explicit command, "the word of the LORD." This refers specifically to the command to utterly destroy the Amalekites and all their possessions, as detailed in 1 Samuel 15:3. Saul's actions demonstrated a profound contempt for God's authority, a preference for his own will, or the approval of the people over divine instruction. This rejection of God's word is presented as the primary and sufficient cause of the subsequent divine judgment.
  • "and the LORD hath rejected thee from being king over Israel." This is the direct consequence and the core of the divine judgment, mirroring Saul's action with divine reciprocity. Because Saul rejected God's word, God, in turn, "rejected" (מָאַס, mâʼaç) him from his divinely appointed position as king. This is not a temporary setback or a mere loss of favor, but a permanent removal from the divinely legitimate office. While Saul continued to reign for some time in a de facto capacity, this declaration marks the spiritual, dynastic, and ultimate end of his kingship in God's eyes, signifying that God's favor, anointing, and blessing had irrevocably departed from him and his lineage. It powerfully highlights God's absolute sovereignty over human rulers and His unwavering commitment to righteous governance.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several powerful literary devices to convey its profound and somber message. Most notably, Repetition of the verb "rejected" (מָאַס, mâʼaç) creates a striking Parallelism, emphasizing the direct cause-and-effect relationship between Saul's action and God's response. The structure, "Thou hast rejected... and the LORD hath rejected thee," underscores the principle of Divine Retribution or Poetic Justice, where the punishment fits the crime in a strikingly analogous manner: Saul's contempt for God's word is met with God's contempt for his kingship. The entire statement functions as a Prophetic Declaration, a solemn, authoritative, and irreversible pronouncement of divine judgment delivered by Samuel, acting as God's unwavering mouthpiece. The brevity, directness, and stark contrast within the language contribute significantly to its dramatic impact, signaling an irreversible turning point in the history of Israel's monarchy.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Samuel 15:26 serves as a foundational text for understanding the absolute nature of divine authority, the critical importance of human accountability, and the non-negotiable necessity of complete obedience within the covenant relationship between God and His people. It teaches unequivocally that God's commands are not mere suggestions or optional guidelines, but rather expressions of His holy, perfect, and sovereign will, and that partial obedience or outright disobedience, particularly from those entrusted with leadership, carries severe and far-reaching consequences. The verse underscores that true worship, genuine faith, and effective service to God are demonstrated not primarily through ritualistic performance, outward shows of piety, or human-devised religious acts, but through a heart that humbly, completely, and immediately submits to and acts upon His revealed word. This principle transcends the specific historical context of Saul's kingship, speaking to the enduring truth that God values faithful and wholehearted obedience above all else, and that the rejection of His word inevitably leads to a withdrawal of His blessing, favor, and ultimately, His presence.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The pronouncement in 1 Samuel 15:26 is a profoundly sobering reminder that God takes our obedience with utmost seriousness, especially when we are entrusted with positions of influence, leadership, or even simply the stewardship of our daily lives. It challenges us to deeply examine our own hearts and motivations: do we truly obey God's word fully, immediately, and without reservation, or do we, like Saul, rationalize partial obedience, seeking to please others, preserve our own comfort, or gain perceived benefits rather than prioritizing God's explicit commands? This passage calls us to a profound humility, acknowledging that our spiritual standing, our effectiveness in God's service, and the very blessing of His presence are contingent upon our faithful, wholehearted adherence to His commands, not on our perceived piety, outward religious acts, or human achievements. It serves as a potent warning against the insidious dangers of spiritual pride, self-justification, and a casual approach to divine instruction, urging us instead to cultivate a spirit of immediate, complete, and joyful submission to the Lord's will, recognizing that genuine, living faith is demonstrated most authentically through our obedient actions.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what specific areas of my life might I be practicing "partial obedience" to God's commands, similar to King Saul?
  • How do I actively prioritize God's word and will over my own desires, the opinions of others, or perceived practical benefits in my daily decisions?
  • What does "rejecting the word of the LORD" look like in a contemporary context, and how can I diligently guard against this subtle but destructive tendency in my own life?
  • How does Saul's tragic story encourage me to cultivate a heart of complete submission, humility, and unwavering devotion before God?

FAQ

Was Saul's rejection truly irreversible, given God's mercy and character?

Answer: While God is indeed infinitely merciful and slow to anger, the rejection pronounced in 1 Samuel 15:26 was presented as a final and irreversible dynastic judgment concerning Saul's kingship. Samuel explicitly states, "the LORD hath rejected thee from being king over Israel," and later, with even greater finality, "the LORD hath torn the kingdom of Israel from thee this day, and hath given it to a neighbour of thine, that is better than thou" in 1 Samuel 15:28. The text further emphasizes the unchangeable nature of this divine decree by declaring, "the Strength of Israel will not lie nor repent: for he is not a man, that he should repent" in 1 Samuel 15:29. This does not imply that God is capricious or lacks compassion, but rather that His judgments, when based on persistent, willful rebellion and a fundamental rejection of His word, are firm, just, and irrevocable in their specific application. While Saul continued to reign for some years, his anointing and the divine legitimacy of his dynasty were irrevocably removed from this point forward, paving the way for David's anointing in 1 Samuel 16 as God's chosen successor.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The tragic narrative of Saul's rejection in 1 Samuel 15:26 powerfully foreshadows the perfect obedience and ultimate, eternal kingship of Jesus Christ. Saul, the first king of Israel, failed catastrophically because he "rejected the word of the LORD," demonstrating a fatal flaw in his character and leadership rooted in self-will and a desire for human approval. In stark and glorious contrast, Jesus, the true King of Israel and the Son of God, perfectly embodied complete and unwavering obedience to the Father's will. From His incarnation, through His life of selfless ministry, to His ultimate sacrificial death on the cross, Jesus consistently declared, "I do nothing of myself; but as my Father hath taught me, I speak these things" as recorded in John 8:28. His entire mission was to "do thy will, O God," as prophesied and fulfilled in Hebrews 10:7. Unlike Saul, who sought to preserve his own glory and please men, Jesus "made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: and being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross," as beautifully articulated in Philippians 2:7-8. Because of His perfect, unblemished obedience, Jesus was not rejected but highly exalted by God, receiving "a name which is above every name" in Philippians 2:9. He is the King whose kingdom "shall have no end" as promised in Luke 1:33, established not on human merit or partial obedience, but on His flawless submission to God's word and His ultimate, redemptive sacrifice to redeem a rebellious humanity, offering a path to reconciliation that Saul's disobedience could never provide.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Samuel 15 verses 24–31

Saul is at length brought to put himself into the dress of the penitent; but it is too evident that he only acts the part of a penitent, and is not one indeed. Observe,

I. How poorly he expressed his repentance. It was with much ado that he was made sensible of his fault, and not till he was threatened with being deposed. This touched him in a tender part. Then he began to relent, and not till then. When Samuel told him he was rejected from being king, then he said, I have sinned, Sa1 15:24. His confession was not free nor ingenuous, but extorted by the rack, and forced from him. We observe here several bad signs of the hypocrisy of his repentance, and that it came short even of Ahab's. 1. He made his application to Samuel only, and seemed most solicitous to stand right in his opinion and to gain his favour. He makes a little god of him, only to preserve his reputation with the people, because they all knew Samuel to be a prophet, and the man that had been the instrument of his preferment. Thinking it would please Samuel, and be a sort of bribe to him, he puts it into his confession: I have transgressed the commandment of the Lord and thy word; as if he had been in God's stead, Sa1 15:24. David, though convinced by the ministry of Nathan, yet, in his confession, has his eye to God alone, not to Nathan. Psa 51:4 Against thee only have I sinned. But Saul, ignorantly enough, confesses his sin as a transgression of Samuel's word; whereas his word was no other than a declaration of the commandment of the Lord. He also applies to Samuel for forgiveness (Sa1 15:25): I pray thee, pardon my sin; as if any could forgive sin but God only. Those wretchedly deceive themselves who, when they have fallen into scandalous sin, think it enough to make their peace with the church and their ministers, by the show and plausible profession of repentance, without taking care to make their peace with God by the sincerity of it. The most charitable construction we can put upon this of Saul is to suppose that he looked upon Samuel as a sort of mediator between him and God, and intended an address to God in his application to him. However, it was very weak. 2. He excused his fault even in the confession of it, and that is never the fashion of a true penitent (Sa1 15:24): I did it because I feared the people, and obeyed their voice. We have reason enough to think that it was purely his own doing and not the people's; however, if they were forward to do it, it is plain, by what we have read before, that he knew how to keep up his authority among them and did not stand in any awe of them. So that the excuse was false and frivolous; whatever he pretended, he did not really fear the people. But it is common for sinners, in excusing their faults, to plead the thoughts and workings of their own minds, because those are things which, how groundless soever, no man can disprove; but they forget that God searchest the heart. 3. All his care was to save his credit, and preserve his interest in the people, lest they should revolt from him, or at least despise him. Therefore he courts Samuel with so much earnestness (Sa1 15:25) to turn again with him, and assist in a public thanksgiving for the victory. Very importunate he was in this matter when he laid hold on the skirt of his mantle to detain him (Sa1 15:27), not that he cared for Samuel, but he feared that if Samuel forsook him the people would do so too. Many seem zealously affected to good ministers and good people only for the sake of their own interest and reputation, while in heart they hate them. But his expression was very gross when he said (Sa1 15:30), I have sinned, yet honour me, I pray thee, before my people. Is this the language of a penitent? No, but the contrary: "I have sinned, shame me now, for to me belongs shame, and no man can loathe me so much as I loathe myself." Yet how often do we meet with the copies of this hypocrisy of Saul! It is very common for those who are convicted of sin to show themselves very solicitous to be honoured before the people. Whereas he that has lost the honour of an innocent can pretend to no other than that of a penitent, and it is the honour of a penitent to take shame to himself.

II. How little he got by these thin shows of repentance. What point did he gain by them? 1. Samuel repeated the sentence passed upon him, so far was he from giving any hopes of the repeal of it, Sa1 15:26, the same with Sa1 15:23. He that covers his sins shall never prosper, Pro 28:13. Samuel refused to turn back with him, but turned about to go away, Sa1 15:27. As the thing appeared to him upon the first view, he thought it altogether unfit for him so far to countenance one whom God had rejected as to join with him in giving thanks to God for a victory which was made to serve rather Saul's covetousness than God's glory. Yet afterwards he did turn again with him (Sa1 15:31), upon further thoughts, and probably by divine direction, either to prevent a mutiny among the people or perhaps not to do honour to Saul (for, though Saul worshipped the Lord, Sa1 15:31, it is not said Samuel presided in that worship), but to do justice on Agag, Sa1 15:32. 2. He illustrated the sentence by a sign, which Saul himself, by his rudeness, gave occasion for. When Samuel was turning from him he tore his clothes to detain him (Sa1 15:27), so loth was he to part with the prophet; but Samuel put a construction upon this accident which none but a prophet could do. He made it to signify the rending of the kingdom from him (Sa1 15:28), and that, like this, was his own doing. "He hath rent it from thee, and given it to a neighbour better than thou," namely, to David, who afterwards, upon occasion, cut off the skirt of Saul's robe (Sa1 24:4), upon which Saul said (Sa1 24:20), I know that thou shalt surely be king, perhaps remembering this sign, the tearing of the skirt of Samuel's mantle. 3. He ratified it by a solemn declaration of its being irreversible (Sa1 15:29): The Strength of Israel will not lie. The Eternity or Victory of Israel, so some read it; the holy One, so the Arabic; the most noble One, so the Syriac; the triumphant King of Israel, so bishop Patrick. "He is determined to depose thee, and he will not change his purpose. He is not a man that should repent." Men are fickle and alter their minds, feeble and cannot effect their purposes; something happens which they could not foresee, by which their measures are broken. But with God it is not so. God has sometimes repented of the evil which he thought to have done, repentance was hidden from Saul, and therefore hidden from God's eyes.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 24–31. Public domain.
Copy as
Gregory of NazianzusAD 390
IN DEFENSE OF HIS FLIGHT TO PONTUS, ORATION 2.113
Moreover, to distinguish still more clearly between them, we have, against the fear of office, a possible help in the law of obedience, inasmuch as God in his goodness rewards our faith, and makes a perfect ruler of the one who has confidence in him, and places all his hopes in him; but against the danger of disobedience I know of nothing which can help us, and of no ground to encourage our confidence. For we should fear that we will have to hear these words concerning those who have been entrusted to us: “I will require their souls at your hands”; and, “Because you have rejected me, and [have] not been leaders and rulers of my people, I also will reject you, that I should not be king over you”; and, “As you refused to listen to my voice, and turned a stubborn back, and were disobedient, so shall it be when you call upon me, and I will not regard nor hear your prayer.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Samuel 15:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.