1 Corinthians 8:13
“Liberty Must Not Cause Stumbling”1 Corinthians 8:9–13
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- διόπερdioperThereforeG1355CONJConjunction
- εἰeiifG1487CONDConjunction
- βρῶμαbrōmafoodG1033N-NSNNoun Nominative Singular Neuter
- σκανδαλίζειskandalizeisnaresG4624V-PAI-3SVerb Present Active Indicative 3rd Singular
- τὸνtontheG3588T-ASMDefinite article Accusative Singular Masculine
- ἀδελφόνadelphonbrotherG80N-ASMNoun Accusative Singular Masculine
- μουmouof mineG3165P-1GSPersonal pronoun Genitive 1st Singular
- οὐoucertainlyG3756PRT-NNegative Particle Negative
- μὴmēnotG3361PRT-NNegative Particle Negative
- φάγωphagōshall I eatG5315V-AAS-1SVerb Aorist Active Subjunctive 1st Singular
- κρέαkreameatG2907N-APNNoun Accusative Plural Neuter
- εἰςeistoG1519PREPPreposition
- τὸνtontheG3588T-ASMDefinite article Accusative Singular Masculine
- αἰῶναaiōnaageG165N-ASMNoun Accusative Singular Masculine
- ἵναinaso thatG2443CONJConjunction
- μὴmēnotG3361PRT-NNegative Particle Negative
- τὸνtontheG3588T-ASMDefinite article Accusative Singular Masculine
- ἀδελφόνadelphonbrotherG80N-ASMNoun Accusative Singular Masculine
- μουmouof mineG3165P-1GSPersonal pronoun Genitive 1st Singular
- σκανδαλίσωskandalisōI may snareG4624V-AAS-1SVerb Aorist Active Subjunctive 1st Singular
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era maps


Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers 1 Corinthians 8:7–13.
The apostle, having granted, and indeed confirmed, the opinion of some among the Corinthians, that idols were nothing, proceeds now to show them that their inference from this assumption was not just, namely, that therefore they might go into the idol-temple, and eat of the sacrifices, and feast there with their heathen neighbours. He does not indeed here so much insist upon the unlawfulness of the thing in itself as the mischief such freedom might do to weaker Christians, persons that had not the same measure of knowledge with these pretenders. And here,
I.He informs them that every Christian man, at that time, was not so fully convinced and persuaded that an idol was nothing.
Howbeit, there is not in every man this knowledge; for some, with conscience of the idol, unto this hour, eat it as a thing offered unto an idol; with conscience of the idol; that is, some confused veneration for it. Though they were converts to Christianity, and professed the true religion, they were not perfectly cured of the old leaven, but retained an unaccountable respect for the idols they had worshipped before. Note, Weak Christians may be ignorant, or have but a confused knowledge of the greatest and plainest truths. Such were those of the one God and one Mediator. And yet some of those who were turned form heathenism to Christianity among the Corinthians seem to have retained a veneration for their idols, utterly irreconcilable with those great principles; so that when an opportunity offered to eat things offered to idols they did not abstain, to testify their abhorrence of idolatry, nor eat with a professed contempt of the idol, by declaring they looked upon it to be nothing; and so their conscience, being weak, was defiled; that is, they contracted guilt; they ate out of respect to the idol, with an imagination that it had something divine in it, and so committed idolatry: whereas the design of the gospel was to turn men from dumb idols to the living God. They were weak in their understanding, not thoroughly apprized of the vanity of idols; and, while they ate what was sacrificed to them out of veneration for them, contracted the guilt of idolatry, and so greatly polluted themselves. This seems to be the sense of the place; though some understand it of weak Christians defiling themselves by eating what was offered to an idol with an apprehension that thereby it became unclean, and made those so in a moral sense who should eat it, every one not having a knowledge that the idol was nothing, and therefore that it could not render what was offered to it in this sense unclean. Note, We should be careful to do nothing that may occasion weak Christians to defile their consciences.
II.He tells them that mere eating and drinking had nothing in them virtuous nor criminal, nothing that could make them better nor worse, pleasing nor displeasing to God: Meat commendeth us not to God; for neither if we eat are we the better, nor if we eat not are we the worse, 1 Corinthians 8:8. It looks as if some of the Corinthians made a merit of their eating what had been offered to idols, and that in their very temples too (1 Corinthians 8:10), because it plainly showed that they thought the idols nothing. But eating and drinking are in themselves actions indifferent. It matters little what we eat. What goes into the man of this sort neither purifies nor defiles. Flesh offered to idols may in itself be as proper for food as any other; and the bare eating, or forbearing to eat, has no virtue in it. Note, It is a gross mistake to think that distinction of food will make any distinction between men in God's account. Eating this food, and forbearing that, having nothing in them to recommend a person to God.
III.He cautions them against abusing their liberty, the liberty they thought they had in this matter.
For that they mistook this matter, and had no allowance to sit at meat in the idol's temple, seems plain from 1 Corinthians 10:20, etc. But the apostle argues here that, even upon the supposition that they had such power, they must be cautious how they use it; it might be a stumbling-block to the weak (1 Corinthians 10:9), it might occasion their falling into idolatrous actions, perhaps their falling off from Christianity and revolting again to heathenism. "If a man see thee, who hast knowledge (hast superior understanding to his, and hereupon concedest that thou hast a liberty to sit at meat, or feast, in an idol's temple, because an idol, thou sayest, is nothing), shall not one who is less thoroughly informed in this matter, and thinks an idol something, be emboldened to eat what was offered to the idol, not as common food, but sacrifice, and thereby be guilty of idolatry?" Such an occasion of falling they should be careful of laying before their weak brethren, whatever liberty or power they themselves had. The apostle backs this caution with two considerations: - 1. The danger that might accrue to weak brethren, even those weak brethren for whom Christ died. We must deny ourselves even what is lawful rather than occasion their stumbling, and endanger their souls (1 Corinthians 10:11): Through thy knowledge shall thy weak brother perish, for whom Christ died? Note, Those whom Christ hath redeemed with his most precious blood should be very precious and dear to us. If he had such compassion as to die for them, that they might not perish, we should have so much compassion for them as to deny ourselves, for their sakes, in various instances, and not use our liberty to their hurt, to occasion their stumbling, or hazard their ruin. That man has very little of the spirit of the Redeemer who had rather his brother should perish than himself be abridged, in any respect, of his liberty. He who hath the Spirit of Christ in him will love those whom Christ loved, so as to die for them, and will study to promote their spiritual and eternal warfare, and shun every thing that would unnecessarily grieve them, and much more every thing that would be likely to occasion their stumbling, or falling into sin. 2. The hurt done to them Christ takes as done to himself: When you sin so against the weak brethren and wound their consciences, you sin against Christ, 1 Corinthians 10:12. Note, Injuries done to Christians are injuries to Christ, especially to babes in Christ, to weak Christians; and most of all, involving them in guilt: wounding their consciences is wounding him. He has a particular care of the lambs of the flock: He gathers them in his arm and carries them in his bosom, Isaiah 60:11. Strong Christians should be very careful to avoid what will offend weak ones, or lay a stumbling-block in their way. Shall we be void of compassion for those to whom Christ has shown so much? Shall we sin against Christ who suffered for us? Shall we set ourselves to defeat his gracious designs, and help to ruin those whom he died to save?
IV.He enforces all with his own example (1 Corinthians 8:13):
Wherefore if meat make my brother to offend I will eat no flesh while the world standeth, lest I make my brother to offend. He does not say that he will never eat more. This were to destroy himself, and to commit a heinous sin, to prevent the sin and fall of a brother. Such evil must not be done that good may come of it. But, though it was necessary to eat, it was not necessary to eat flesh. And therefore, rather than occasion sin in a brother, he would abstain from it as long as he lived. He had such a value for the soul of his brother that he would willingly deny himself in a matter of liberty, and forbear any particular food, which he might have lawfully eaten and might like to eat, rather than lay a stumbling-block in a weak brother's way, and occasion him to sin, by following his example, without being clear in his mind whether it were lawful or no. Note, We should be very tender of doing any thing that may be an occasion of stumbling to others, though it may be innocent in itself. Liberty is valuable, but the weakness of a brother should induce, and sometimes bind, us to waive it. We must not rigorously claim nor use our own rights, to the hurt and ruin of a brother's soul, and so to the injury of our Redeemer, who died for him. When it is certainly foreseen that my doing what I may forbear will occasion a fellow-christian to do what he ought to forbear, I shall offend, scandalize, or lay a stumbling-block in his way, which to do is a sin, however lawful the thing itself be which is done. And, if we must be so careful not to occasion other men's sins, how careful should we be to avoid sin ourselves! If we must not endanger other men's souls, how much should we be concerned not to destroy our own!
Historical interpretation
Two Centuries of Reception
5 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
"For if any of such meats make a brother to stumble, I shall not eat it as long as the world lasts "says he, "that I may not make my brother stumble."
Moreover, what a number of serious mischiefs we see to have arisen hence; and what a multitude of virgins we behold corrupted by unlawful and dangerous conjunctions of this kind, to our great grief of mind! But if they have faithfully dedicated themselves to Christ, let them persevere in modesty and chastity, without incurring any evil report, and so in courage and steadiness await the reward of virginity. But if they are unwilling or unable to persevere, it is better that they should marry, than that by their crimes they should fall into the fire. Certainly let them not cause a scandal to the brethren or sisters, since it is written, "If meat cause my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world standeth, lest I make my brother to offend."
It is all right to have a wife, but if she commits adultery she is to be rejected. Likewise, it is all right to eat meat, but if it has been sacrificed to idols it is to be refused.
"Wherefore, if meat make my brother to stumble, I will eat no flesh for ever." This is like the best of teachers, to teach in his own person the things which he speaks. Nor did he say whether justly or unjustly; but in any case. "I say not," (such is his tone,) "meat offered in sacrifice to an idol, which is already prohibited for another reason; but if any even of those things which are within license and are permitted causes stumbling, from these also will I abstain: and not one or two days, but all the time of my life." For he saith, "I will eat no flesh for ever." And he said not, "Lest I destroy my brother," but simply, "That I make not my brother to stumble." For indeed it comes of folly in the extreme that what things are greatly cared for by Christ, and such as He should have even chosen to die for them, these we should esteem so entirely beneath our notice as not even to abstain from meats on their account.
Those who are stronger and are not troubled by scruples are nevertheless commanded to abstain so as not to offend those who, on account of their weakness, still find abstinence necessary.
Continue studying 1 Corinthians 8:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
Paul resolves that if food would make his brother stumble, he will give up eating flesh for as long as the world stands.
“Wherefore,”
Dióper, “on which very account”, draws the conclusion from the whole chapter.
“if meat make my brother to offend,”
“Meat” is food, brōma. The condition is a brother tripped into sin by what Paul eats.
“I will eat no flesh while the world standeth,”
Paul states his resolve as strongly as he can, for as long as the world lasts.
“lest I make my brother to offend.”
The purpose of the whole resolve, and the second time the phrase stands in the verse.
Passage study1 Corinthians 8:9–13
Liberty Must Not Cause Stumbling
Summary
In these five verses Paul brings his teaching on food offered to idols to its point. He has already granted that an idol is nothing in the world and that a believer who knows this is free to eat. Now he warns that this liberty can become a stumblingblock to a weaker believer. If such a brother sees a Christian with knowledge eating in an idol’s temple, he may be emboldened to eat against his own conscience and so be brought to ruin, though Christ died for him. To wound a brother’s conscience like that is to sin against Christ. Paul closes with his own resolve: if food would make his brother stumble, he will give up flesh for as long as the world stands. The freedom Christ gives us is real, and love for the brother he bought governs how we use it.
What was troubling the church in Corinth?
The church in Corinth was divided over meat that had been offered to idols. Corinth was a wealthy Roman port and provincial capital with a mixed population and many temples, among them temples to Aphrodite, Apollo and Poseidon. Animals were sacrificed there, and the meat left over was sold in the public market, the macellum, or eaten at feasts held in the temple precincts. A believer could meet it at the market, at a feast, and even at a private meal.
Paul opens the subject in 1 Corinthians 8 with the words “Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth” (1 Corinthians 8:1). He agrees with those who know “that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one” (1 Corinthians 8:4), so for a believer who understands this the meat is simply food. Then he adds that some lack this knowledge, and their weak conscience is defiled when they eat (1 Corinthians 8:7).
Many in the church had come to Christ out of a lifetime of idol worship, and that life had taught them that such a meal was an act of worship and communion with a god. For them the line between eating food and taking part in the old rites was blurred, and eating this meat, above all in a temple, felt like going back to idolatry or betraying their new faith. Jewish believers may have had scruples of their own, rooted in their food laws. Others had grasped that idols are powerless, and they ate freely. Paul’s answer runs through 1 Corinthians 8–10, and these five verses bring chapter 8 to its point. The knowledge of the strong is true, and love decides how it is used.
How can liberty become a stumblingblock?
Liberty becomes a stumblingblock when a believer uses a real right in a way that trips up a weaker brother, and verse 9 warns against exactly that. “But” is dé, a small connective that can join, continue or contrast, and here it turns from what the knowing believer may do to what his freedom can do to someone else. “Take heed” translates blépō, to look, used here as a command to watch carefully and think ahead. “Lest by any means” is mḗpōs, which voices a real fear that the very freedom they prize could do harm.
The word for liberty, exousía, means authority or right, and it also covers plain power or ability. Paul grants the right in full and then sets a limit on how it is used. “Become” is gínomai, to become or come into being. Freedom in Christ is good, and in careless hands it can come to be something else. Paul asks for freedom used in love, and at times love will lay a freedom aside for a brother’s sake.
A stumblingblock, próskomma, comes from a word meaning to strike against. It is something in the path that makes a person trip and fall, and Paul uses the picture for whatever leads another believer into sin or doubt, sets him back in his walk, or makes him act against his conscience. “Them that are weak” translates asthenéō, to be feeble or lacking strength, the same verb that stands behind “the weak brother” in verse 11. These are believers whose understanding is still incomplete and whose faith is tender and easily swayed.
Paul gives the same rule in Romans: “judge this rather, that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in his brother’s way” (Romans 14:13). Later in this letter he puts it as a principle for all of life: “All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not. Let no man seek his own, but every man another’s wealth” (1 Corinthians 10:23–24). He asks the Philippians, too, to look “every man also on the things of others” (Philippians 2:3–4). Liberty is a gift to be stewarded, and its measure is the good of the brother beside us.
The believer at a meal in the idol’s temple
Paul pictures a believer “which hast knowledge” at a meal in an idol’s temple, with a weaker brother watching. The knowledge, gnōsis, is the act of knowing, and here it means the understanding that an idol is mere wood or stone, powerless, and that there is one true God. “Sit at meat” is katákeimai, to recline, the usual posture at a feast. The eidōleîon is an idol’s temple, an image-house. The place matters, because a meal inside the temple was far more closely tied to the worship of the god than meat bought in the market, and to a sensitive conscience it looked like taking part in that worship. “If any man see thee” puts the weight on the example that is set. What the weak brother watches is what he will copy.
“Shall not the conscience of him which is weak be emboldened” is a question that expects the answer yes. The conscience, syneídēsis, is the inner moral awareness that judges our thoughts and actions, accusing or excusing. “Weak” here is asthenḗs, the adjective from which the verb of verses 9 and 11 is formed.
“Emboldened” is oikodoméō, to build, and figuratively to build up or edify. It is the verb behind “charity edifieth” in 1 Corinthians 8:1, and here Paul turns it with a sad irony. The strong believer’s example does build the weak brother up, and what it builds is the confidence to eat eidōlóthyton, “those things which are offered to idols”, while his own conscience still says it is wrong. He acts against his conviction, defiles his conscience, and sins against God. Paul gives the same warning in Romans: “For meat destroy not the work of God. All things indeed are pure; but it is evil for that man who eateth with offence” (Romans 14:20–21).
Who are the weak?
The weak are believers whose conscience is still sensitive on this matter. Many were new converts from idol worship who still linked this meat with their old gods, and some were simply younger in the faith. Their weakness lies in understanding and in the firmness of their conscience on this one question, and Paul attaches no moral or spiritual inferiority to it. If they ate, their own hearts would condemn them, even though the food itself is clean before God. Their conscience, weak as it is in knowledge, still deserves respect and protection, and Paul deals with the same kind of disputed matter at length in Romans 14.
A brother for whom Christ died
“And through thy knowledge shall the weak brother perish, for whom Christ died?” The strong believer’s knowledge, gnōsis again, is true in itself, and here it becomes the means of another’s ruin because it acts without regard for him. “Perish” is apóllymi, to destroy fully, to perish or to be lost. Paul again asks a question, and the answer it expects is that such a thing is unthinkable.
The last words carry the weight. Christ gave his life for this weak brother, and God values him at that price. The strong believer is asked only to give up a meal. Paul says the same in Romans: “Destroy not him with thy meat, for whom Christ died” (Romans 14:15). Jesus himself warned, “But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea” (Matthew 18:6–7). Paul later sums up the whole matter of eating and drinking: “Whether therefore ye eat, or drink, or whatsoever ye do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Corinthians 10:31).
Does “perish” mean the brother is lost for ever?
Paul means real ruin. A brother led to sin against his conscience is harmed in his walk with God, set back, and may even turn away from the faith. The word apóllymi can describe eternal destruction, and believers differ on how far it reaches here. Some believers hold that a true believer can fall away, so that Paul is warning of a brother lost for ever. Others hold that those who truly belong to Christ are kept by him, so that “perish” here means grievous spiritual harm, a faith wrecked and a life turned aside, short of the loss of salvation. On either reading the harm is grave enough for Paul to set it beside the death of Christ, and that is the point of his question.
Why is wounding a brother a sin against Christ?
Believers are members of Christ’s body, so a wound given to one of them is felt by the Head. Paul uses “sin” twice in verse 12, first for the wrong done to the brethren and then for the wrong done to Christ. The verb, hamartánō, is the common word for sinning, and at root it means to miss the mark. A strong believer may think of his meal as a harmless use of freedom, and Paul calls it sin.
“Wound” is týptō, to strike or beat, a word for physical blows used here of a conscience. A weak conscience, syneídēsis as in verse 10, is struck when it is pushed to act against its own convictions, and the blow leaves guilt, confusion and distress.
Then comes “ye sin against Christ”. Paul calls the church “the body of Christ” (1 Corinthians 12:27), with Christ as its Head, so harm done to a member is done to him. Jesus taught the same: “Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me” (Matthew 25:40). When he met Saul, who was persecuting believers, he asked, “Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?” (Acts 9:4). The weak brother belongs to Christ, and Christ takes the wound as his own. This is why Paul tells the Galatians, “use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another” (Galatians 5:13).
Paul’s resolve: no flesh while the world standeth
“Wherefore” is dióper, “on which very account”, and it draws Paul’s conclusion from all he has said. “Meat” in the KJV means food of any kind, and the Greek brōma is a general word for food, used especially of foods that Jewish law allowed or forbade. Here it is the food offered to idols. Then Paul goes further and speaks of eating “flesh”.
“Make my brother to offend” is skandalízō, from skandalon, a trap or snare. It means to trip someone up and so lead him into sin, into falling away, or into acting against his conscience. In the KJV, “offend” carries this older sense of causing someone to stumble and fall.
The phrase “make my brother to offend” stands twice in this verse. Adelphós is a brother by birth or, as here, a fellow believer, and the repetition keeps that family bond before us. “While the world standeth” renders eis aiṓn, from eis, “into”, and aiṓn, “an age”, so “for the age” or for ever. It is a strong hyperbole for a resolve meant to last for good. The closing “lest” is hína mḗ, “in order that not”, and it states his purpose: to keep from being the cause of a brother’s fall.
Paul turns from “thee” and “ye” to “I” and “my”. He offers himself as the living example of what he teaches, and his readiness to give up a lawful thing lends weight to his words. In Romans he says it again: “It is good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine, nor any thing whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is made weak” (Romans 14:20–21).
Did Paul forbid Christians to eat meat?
Paul is speaking of his own freedom to eat, which he will give up wherever his eating would make a brother stumble, and the meat in question in Corinth was meat offered to idols. Elsewhere he writes that “every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving” (1 Timothy 4:4). His concern is the setting of a meal and its effect on a brother with a sensitive conscience. Love for that brother weighs more with him than his right to the meal.
Christ, who pleased not himself
Paul’s call to lay down liberty for a weak brother follows the pattern of Christ himself. Christ, “being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant”, and he became obedient to death, even death on a cross (Philippians 2:5–8). Paul writes in Romans, “We then that are strong ought to bear the infirmities of the weak, and not to please ourselves”, and he gives the reason: “For even Christ pleased not himself” (Romans 15:1–3). Jesus said that he “came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45), and Paul writes that God “hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him” (2 Corinthians 5:21).
The weak brother of verse 11 is one of those for whom Christ did all this. Christ gave up far more than a meal for him, and the strong believer who lays down a right for that brother’s sake is walking in his Lord’s steps. The cross itself is a stumblingblock to some, as Paul says early in this letter: “Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness” (1 Corinthians 1:23–24). That offence belongs to the gospel. What verse 9 warns against is a stumblingblock of our own making, laid in a brother’s path by the way we use our freedom.
Freedom held for a brother’s sake
Our freedom in Christ is real. He has set us free from the bondage of the Law and from superstitious fear, and Paul himself knew that an idol is nothing. These verses show what that freedom is for. God values every believer at the price of his Son’s death, and Christ takes a wound given to the weakest of his people as given to himself. Knowledge of the truth is a good gift, and in this passage love governs how it is used.
The questions in our churches today are different ones: entertainment, social media, alcohol, fashion, political stances, even the way we argue about theology. A believer newly delivered from drink who watches a mature Christian drink freely may be drawn back into it, and then that freedom has become the stumblingblock of verse 9. Paul’s words in verse 13 meet such a case directly, because his brother’s walk with God mattered more to him than his own right to eat. Spiritual strength in this passage is shown by laying a right down for another, as Paul resolved to do and as Christ did for us.
1 Corinthians 8:9
“But take heed”
The connective dé turns from the right Paul has granted to the danger in using it, and blépō calls for watchful foresight.
“lest by any means this liberty of yours”
The word mḗpōs voices real concern. “Of yours” grants that the liberty, exousía, truly belongs to them.
“become a stumblingblock”
A good right can turn into an obstacle that trips a brother into sin.
“to them that are weak.”
Believers still tender in faith and understanding on this matter, the ones Paul is concerned to protect.
1 Corinthians 8:10
“For if any man see thee”
The harm comes through what is seen. The strong believer’s meal is an example to the one watching.
“which hast knowledge”
The gnōsis that an idol is nothing and that God is one.
“sit at meat in the idol’s temple,”
Reclining at a feast inside the eidōleîon, the setting most closely tied to the god’s worship.
“shall not the conscience of him which is weak”
A question expecting the answer yes. The weak brother’s conscience is what is at stake.
“be emboldened to eat those things which are offered to idols;”
He is “built up” to eat what his conscience still condemns, and so he sins against it.
1 Corinthians 8:11
“And through thy knowledge”
The strong believer’s true knowledge becomes the instrument of harm when love is missing.
“shall the weak brother perish,”
He is a brother, and what is done to him is ruin.
“for whom Christ died?”
The price Christ paid for him is the measure of his worth, and the question answers itself.
1 Corinthians 8:12
“But when ye sin so against the brethren,”
“So” points back to the meal in the temple that emboldens the weak. What looked like a harmless freedom is sin.
“and wound their weak conscience,”
A blow struck at a tender conscience, which leaves guilt and confusion behind.
“ye sin against Christ.”
The wrong reaches the Head through his member, and Paul’s warning reaches its height.
1 Corinthians 8:13 This verse
“Wherefore,”
Dióper, “on which very account”, draws the conclusion from the whole chapter.
“if meat make my brother to offend,”
“Meat” is food, brōma. The condition is a brother tripped into sin by what Paul eats.
“I will eat no flesh while the world standeth,”
Paul states his resolve as strongly as he can, for as long as the world lasts.
“lest I make my brother to offend.”
The purpose of the whole resolve, and the second time the phrase stands in the verse.
Last revised