Skip to content
“The Symbolic Acts of the True Shepherd”· Zechariah 11:7–14
Translation
King James Version
And I took my staff, even Beauty, and cut it asunder, that I might break my covenant which I had made with all the people.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And I took H3947 my staff H4731, even Beauty H5278, and cut it asunder H1438, that I might break H6565 my covenant H1285 which I had made H3772 with all the people H5971.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
I took my staff No'am and snapped it in two, "in order to break my covenant, which I made with all the peoples."
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Next I took my staff called Favor and cut it in two, revoking the covenant I had made with all the nations.
Ask
American Standard Version
And I took my staff Beauty, and cut it asunder, that I might break my covenant which I had made with all the peoples.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
I took my staff Favor, and cut it apart, that I might break my covenant that I had made with all the peoples.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And I tooke my staffe, euen Beautie, and brake it, that I might disanull my couenant, which I had made with all people.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And I take My staff Pleasantness, and cut it asunder, to make void My covenant that I had made with all the peoples:
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 23,039 of 31,102 · 74.1%

Study This Verse

Summary

Zechariah 11:10 portrays a profound symbolic act within a prophetic vision, illustrating God's judicial withdrawal of His gracious covenant from Israel. Through the prophet's dramatic action of breaking the staff named "Beauty," the verse signifies the dissolution of the divine favor and protection that God had extended to His people, a consequence of their persistent unfaithfulness and rejection of His shepherdly care. This act foreshadows a period of judgment and the fracturing of the unity among the people, setting the stage for further prophetic revelation concerning their future.

Context

Literary Context

Zechariah 11:10 is a pivotal moment within a complex allegorical passage (Zechariah 11:4-17) where the prophet Zechariah assumes the role of a shepherd tending a flock destined for slaughter. This section immediately follows the divine command for Zechariah to "shepherd the flock doomed to slaughter" (Zechariah 11:4), a flock whose "owners slaughter them and go unpunished" (Zechariah 11:5). The prophet employs two staffs: "Beauty" (or "Graciousness") and "Bands" (or "Union"). The breaking of "Beauty" in this verse precedes the breaking of the second staff, "Bands," in Zechariah 11:14, indicating a two-fold judgment: first, the withdrawal of God's favor, and second, the fracturing of national unity between Judah and Israel. The narrative then progresses to the shepherd's dismissal for "thirty pieces of silver" (Zechariah 11:12-13), a clear prophetic foreshadowing of the betrayal of the Messiah.

Historical & Cultural Context

The prophetic ministry of Zechariah occurred after the Babylonian exile, during the period of rebuilding the temple in Jerusalem (circa 520-518 BC). The people had returned to the land, but their spiritual fervor had waned, and they faced internal struggles and external pressures. The imagery of a shepherd and flock was deeply resonant in ancient Near Eastern cultures, where kings and leaders were often depicted as shepherds of their people. God Himself is frequently portrayed as the ultimate Shepherd of Israel (e.g., Psalm 23). The "covenant" referenced here primarily refers to the Mosaic Covenant established at Sinai, which outlined God's gracious relationship with Israel and their obligations to Him. The breaking of such a covenant, often symbolized by a ritual act, signified the termination of the agreement due to one party's failure to uphold its terms.

Key Themes

This verse contributes significantly to several overarching themes within Zechariah and the broader prophetic corpus. The most prominent is the Broken Covenant, highlighting God's faithfulness to His promises but also His righteous judgment when His people persistently violate their covenant obligations. This act underscores the Consequences of Rejection, as Israel's unfaithfulness and eventual rejection of the true Shepherd lead to the withdrawal of divine favor and protection. It also speaks to the theme of Divine Judgment, where God's patience reaches its limit, and He allows the natural consequences of rebellion to unfold. Furthermore, it subtly introduces the theme of the Rejected Shepherd, which becomes more explicit in subsequent verses, foreshadowing the ultimate rejection of God's chosen leader, the Messiah, as seen in the price paid for the shepherd in Zechariah 11:12.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Beauty nôʻam' H5278

This word signifies agreeableness, delight, suitableness, splendor, or grace. In this context, it embodies God's gracious covenant, His pleasant dealings, and the favor and protection He extended to Israel. The staff named "Beauty" represents the delightful, benevolent aspect of God's relationship with His people, characterized by peace, prosperity, and divine presence.

cut it asunder gâdaʻ' H1438

This primitive root means to fell a tree or, more generally, to destroy anything; to cut (asunder, in sunder, down, off), or hew down. The violent action of cutting the staff "Beauty" in two is a powerful visual metaphor for the termination, destruction, or complete severance of God's gracious covenant. It signifies a decisive and irreversible break, not a mere weakening.

covenant bᵉrîyth' H1285

This term denotes a compact, confederacy, or league, often understood as being made by passing between pieces of flesh (referencing ancient covenant-making rituals). Here, it refers to the solemn agreement between God and Israel, primarily the Mosaic Covenant, which established their unique relationship as God's chosen people under His divine law and promises. The breaking of this bᵉrîyth implies the annulment of the mutual obligations and the withdrawal of the associated blessings and protections.

Verse Breakdown

"And I took my staff, [even] Beauty"

The prophet Zechariah, acting as the symbolic shepherd, takes hold of one of his two staffs. This staff, named "Beauty" (or "Graciousness"), represents the pleasant, favorable, and benevolent aspect of God's covenant relationship with Israel. It signifies the divine favor, protection, and gracious dealings that God had extended to His people, providing them with peace and security.

"and cut it asunder"

This is the decisive and dramatic action. The prophet violently breaks or severs the staff "Beauty." This physical act symbolizes the shattering or annulment of the gracious covenant. It is a visual declaration that God's pleasant and favorable dealings with Israel are coming to an end, due to their unfaithfulness and rejection of His shepherdly care. The breaking is complete and irreversible, signifying the withdrawal of divine protection and the cessation of the covenant's blessings.

"that I might break my covenant which I had made with all the people"

The purpose clause explicitly states the theological implication of the symbolic act. The breaking of the staff is directly equated with the breaking of God's covenant. This covenant, established with "all the people" (meaning the entire nation of Israel), is now being annulled by God. This is not an arbitrary act but a judicial consequence of the people's persistent rebellion, idolatry, and rejection of God's righteous demands. It signifies a shift from a period of grace and protection to one of judgment and exposure to their enemies.

Literary Devices

Zechariah 11:10 is rich in Symbolism and Allegory. The prophet Zechariah himself acts as an allegorical figure, embodying the role of God as the Shepherd of Israel. The staff named "Beauty" is a powerful symbol representing God's gracious covenant, His favor, and the pleasantness of His dealings with His people. The act of "cutting it asunder" is a symbolic action, a Prophetic Sign-Act, which visually communicates the breaking of this covenant. This physical demonstration makes the abstract theological concept of covenant dissolution tangible and impactful. The verse also employs Metaphor, equating the staff with the covenant, thereby transferring the concrete action of breaking a staff to the abstract concept of breaking a sacred agreement. The entire passage functions as an Allegory, where the shepherd, the staffs, and the flock all represent deeper spiritual realities concerning God, His covenants, and the nation of Israel.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Zechariah 11:10 powerfully illustrates the conditional nature of God's covenant with Israel, particularly the Mosaic Covenant. While God's character is eternally faithful, His covenant relationship with His people involved mutual obligations. When Israel repeatedly violated their part of the covenant through idolatry, disobedience, and rejection of God's prophets, God, in His righteousness, withdrew His protective favor. This act of breaking the staff "Beauty" is a divine judgment, signifying the end of an era of grace and the ushering in of a period of distress and dispersion for the nation. It underscores the severity of rejecting God's gracious leadership and the consequences of spiritual rebellion. This prophetic act serves as a warning against taking God's covenant blessings for granted and highlights the ultimate cost of unfaithfulness.

Reflection and Application

Zechariah 11:10 serves as a sobering reminder that God's grace, while abundant, is not to be presumed upon or abused. The breaking of the staff "Beauty" signifies the painful consequences of persistent unfaithfulness and rejection of divine leadership. For believers today, this passage calls for a deep appreciation of the new covenant established through Jesus Christ, a covenant founded on grace and secured by His sacrifice, not on our flawless obedience. Yet, it also warns against complacency and spiritual apathy. While our salvation is secure in Christ, our walk with God still calls for faithfulness, obedience, and a responsive heart to His leading. To ignore God's voice, neglect His commands, or reject His loving guidance can lead to a withdrawal of His manifest blessings and a season of spiritual barrenness, even if not a complete annulment of our salvation. This verse prompts us to examine our own hearts: Are we valuing God's presence and guidance in our lives? Are we truly following the Good Shepherd, or are we, like the flock in Zechariah, prone to straying and rejecting His care?

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what ways might we, as individuals or as a community, inadvertently "break" our covenant relationship with God through our actions or attitudes?
  2. What does Zechariah 11:10 teach us about the seriousness of God's covenants and the consequences of unfaithfulness?
  3. How does understanding the breaking of the "Beauty" staff deepen our appreciation for the unmerited grace of the New Covenant in Christ?

FAQ

What does the staff "Beauty" symbolize in Zechariah 11:10?

The staff "Beauty" (Hebrew: nôʻam) symbolizes God's gracious covenant with Israel, representing His pleasant dealings, divine favor, and the protective peace and prosperity He extended to His people. It embodies the delightful and benevolent aspect of God's relationship with them, a relationship characterized by His loving care and provision. Its breaking signifies the termination of this period of grace and the withdrawal of His favor due to Israel's unfaithfulness.

Why did God "break" His covenant with all the people?

God's breaking of the covenant, as symbolized by the cutting of the staff "Beauty," was not an arbitrary act but a judicial consequence of Israel's persistent rebellion, idolatry, and rejection of His righteous demands and prophetic warnings. The covenant, particularly the Mosaic Covenant, involved mutual obligations. When Israel repeatedly failed to uphold their end of the agreement, God, in His justice and holiness, withdrew His protective hand and the blessings associated with the covenant, leading to judgment and dispersion. This act underscores the principle that while God is faithful, His covenant blessings are contingent upon the people's responsiveness and obedience.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Zechariah 11:10, with its depiction of the broken staff "Beauty" and the annulled covenant, finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the ultimate rejection of God's true Shepherd, Jesus Christ. The prophetic drama of Zechariah, where the shepherd is rejected and paid "thirty pieces of silver" (Zechariah 11:12), directly foreshadows Judas's betrayal of Jesus for the same amount (Matthew 26:15). The breaking of the staff "Beauty" signifies the end of the Old Covenant's efficacy for those who rejected God's Son. However, in an act of profound divine grace, this breaking paved the way for the establishment of a superior, unbreakable covenant—the New Covenant in Christ's blood (Jeremiah 31:31-34). Through His sacrificial death on the cross, Jesus became the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29) and the Mediator of this new and eternal covenant (Hebrews 8:6). Thus, while Zechariah 11:10 depicts a covenant broken due to human unfaithfulness, it ultimately points to the greater work of Christ, who, through His own suffering and rejection, inaugurated a covenant of grace that offers true beauty, peace, and an enduring relationship with God for all who believe (Romans 5:1-2).

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Zechariah 11:4–14. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 11 verses
Passage under commentZechariah 11:4–14
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

The prophet here is made a type of Christ, as the prophet Isaiah sometimes was; and the scope of these verses is to show that for judgment Christ came into this world (Joh 9:39), for judgment to the Jewish church and nation, which were, about the time of his coming, wretchedly corrupted and degenerated by the worldliness and hypocrisy of their rulers. Christ would have healed them, but they would not be healed; they are therefore left desolate, and abandoned to ruin. Observe here,

I.The desperate case of the Jewish church, under the tyranny of their own governors.

Their slavery in their own country made them as miserable as their captivity in strange countries had done: Their possessors slay them and sell them, Zac 11:5. In Zechariah's time we find the rulers and the nobles justly rebuked for exacting usury of their brethren; and the governors, even by their servants, oppressive to the people, Neh 5:7, Neh 5:15. In Christ's time the chief priests and the elders, who were the possessors of the flock, by their traditions, the commandments of men, and their impositions on the consciences of the people, became perfect tyrants, devoured their houses, engrossed their wealth, and fleeced the flock instead of feeding it. The Sadducees, who were deists, corrupted their judgments. The Pharisees, who were bigots for superstition, corrupted their morals, by making void the commandments of God, Mat 15:16. Thus they slew the sheep of the flock, thus they sold them. They cared not what became of them so they could but gain their own ends and serve their own interests. And,

1.In this they justified themselves: They slay them and hold themselves not guilty. They think that there is no harm in it, and that they shall never be called to an account for it by the chief Shepherd; as if their power were given them for destruction, which was designed only for edification, and as if, because they sat in Moses's seat, they were not under the obligation of Moses's law, but might dispense with it, and with themselves in the breach of it, at their pleasure. Note, Those have their minds woefully blinded indeed who do ill and justify themselves in doing it; but God will not hold those guiltless who hold themselves so.

2.In this they affronted God, by giving him thanks for the gain of their oppression: They said, Blessed be the Lord, for I am rich, as if, because they prospered in their wickedness, got money by it, and raised estates, God had made himself patron of their unjust practices, and Providence had become particeps criminis - the associate of their guilt. What is got honestly we ought to give God thanks for, and to bless him whose blessing makes rich and adds no sorrow with it. But with what face can we go to God either to beg a blessing upon the unlawful methods of getting wealth or to return him thanks for success in them? They should rather have gone to God to confess the sin, to take shame to themselves for it, and to vow restitution, than thus to mock him by making the gains of sin the gift of God, who hates robbery for burnt-offerings, and reckons not himself praised by the thanksgiving if he be dishonoured either in the getting or the using of that which we give him thanks for.

3.In this they put contempt upon the people of God, as unworthy their regard or compassionate consideration: Their own shepherds pity them not; they make them miserable, and then do not commiserate them. Christ had compassion on the multitude because they fainted and were scattered abroad, as if they had no shepherd (as really they had worse than none); but their own shepherds pitied them not, nor showed any concern for them. Note, It is ill for a church when its pastors have no tenderness, no compassion for precious souls, when they can look upon the ignorant, the foolish, the wicked, the weak, without pity.

II.The sentence of God's wrath passed upon them for their senselessness and stupidity in this condition.

There was a general decay, nay, a destruction, of religion among them, and it was all one to them; they regarded it not. My people love to have it so, Jer 5:31. Though they were oppressed and broken in judgment, yet they willingly walked after the commandment, Hos 5:11. And, as their shepherds pitied them not, so they did not bemoan themselves; therefore God says (Zac 11:6), "I will no more pity the inhabitants of the land. They have courted their own destruction, and so let their doom be." But those are truly miserable whom the God of mercy himself will no more have compassion upon. Those who are willing to have their consciences oppressed by those who teach for doctrines the commandments of men (as the Jews were, who called those Rabbi, Rabbi, that did so, Mat 15:9; Mat 23:7), are often punished by oppression in their civil interests, and justly, for those forfeit their own rights who tamely give up God's rights. The Jews did so; the Papists do so; and who can pity them if they be ruled with rigour? God here threatens them,

1.That he will deliver them into the hand of oppressors, every one into his neighbour's hand, so that they shall use one another barbarously. The several parties in Jerusalem did so; the zealots, the seditious, as they were called, committed greater outrages than the common enemy did, as Josephus relates in his history of the wars of the Jews. They shall be delivered every one into the hand of his king, that is, the Roman emperor, whom they chose to submit to rather than to Christ, saying, We have no king but Caesar. Thus they thought to ingratiate themselves with their lords and masters. But for this God brought the Romans upon them, who took away their place and nation.

2.That he will not deliver them out of their hands: They shall smite the land, the whole land, and out of their hand I will not deliver them; and, if the Lord do not help them, none else can, nor can they help themselves.

III.A trial yet made whether their ruin might be prevented by sending Christ among them as a shepherd; God had sent his servants to them in vain, but last of all he sent unto them his Son, saying, They will reverence my Son, Mat 21:37. Divers of the prophets had spoken of him as the Shepherd of Israel, Isa 40:11; Eze 34:23. he himself told the Pharisees that he was the Shepherd of the sheep, and that those who pretended to be shepherds were thieves and robbers (Joh 10:1, Joh 10:2, Joh 10:11), apparently referring to this passage, where we have,

1.The charge he received from his Father to try what might be done with this flock (Zac 11:4): Thus saith the Lord my God (Christ called his Father his God because he acted in compliance with his will and with an eye to his glory in his whole undertaking), Feed the flock of the slaughter. The Jews were God's flock, but they were the flock of slaughter, for their enemies had killed them all the day long and accounted them as sheep for the slaughter; their own possessors slew them, and God himself had doomed them to the slaughter. Yet "feed them by reproof instruction, and comfort; provide wholesome food for those who have so long been soured with the leaven of the scribes and Pharisees." Other sheep he had, which were not of this fold, and which afterwards must be brought; but he is first sent to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, Mat 15:24.

2.His acceptance of this charge, and his undertaking pursuant to it, Zac 11:7. He does as it were say, Lo, I come to do thy will, O my God! and, since this is thy will, it is mine: I will feed the flock of slaughter. Christ will care for these lost sheep; he will go about among them, teaching and healing even you, O poor of the flock! Christ did not neglect the meanest, nor overlook them for their meanness. The shepherds that made a prey of them regarded not the poor; they were conversant with those only that they could get by; but Christ preached his gospel to the poor, Mat 11:5. It was an instance of his humiliation that his converse was mostly with the inferior sort of people; his disciples, who were his constant attendants, were of the poor of the flock.

3.His furnishing himself with tools proper for the charge he had undertaken: I took unto me two staves, pastoral staves; other shepherds have but one crook, but Christ had two, denoting the double care he took of his flock, and what he did both for the souls and for the bodies of men. David speaks of God's rod and his staff (Psa 23:4), a correcting rod and a supporting staff. One of these staves was called Beauty, denoting the temple, which is called the beauty of holiness and one of its gates beautiful, which Christ called his Father's house, and for which he showed a great zeal when he cleared it of the buyers and sellers; the other he called Bands, denoting their civil state, and the incorporate society of that nation, which Christ also took care of by preaching love and peace among them. Christ, in his gospel, and in all he did among them, consulted the advancement both of their civil and of their sacred interests.

4.His execution of his office, as the chief Shepherd. He fed the flock (Zac 11:7), and he displaced those under-shepherds that were false to their trust (Zac 11:8): Three shepherds I cut off in one month. Through the deficiency and uncertainty of the history of the Jewish church, in its latter ages, we know not what particular event this had its accomplishment in; in general, it seems to be an act of power and justice for the punishment of the sinful shepherds and the redress of the grievances of the abused flock. Some understand it of the three orders of princes, priests, and scribes or prophets, who, when Christ had finished his work, were laid aside for their unfaithfulness. Others understand it of the three sects among the Jews, of Pharisees, Sadducees, and Herodians, all whom Christ silenced in dispute (Mt. 22) and soon after cut off, all in a little time.

IV.Their enmity to Christ, and making themselves odious to him.

He came to his own, the sheep of his own pasture; it might have been expected that between them and him there would be an entire affection, as between the shepherd and his sheep; but they conducted themselves so ill that his soul loathed them, was straitened towards them (so it may be read); he intended them kindness, but could not do them the kindness he intended them, because of their unbelief, Mat 13:58. He was disappointed in them, discouraged concerning them, grieved for them, not only for the shepherds, whom he cut off, but for the people, whom Christ often looked upon with grief in his heart and tears in his eyes. Their provocations even wore out his patience, and he was weary of that faithless and perverse generation. Their soul also it abhorred me; and therefore it was that his soul loathed them; for, whatever estrangement there is between God and man, it begins on man's side. The Jewish shepherds rejected this chief Shepherd, as the Jewish builders rejected this chief corner stone. They had indignation at Christ's doctrine and miracles, and his interest in the people, to whom they did all they could to render him odious, as they had made themselves odious to him. Note, There is a mutual enmity between God and wicked people; they are hateful to God and haters of God. Nothing speaks more the sinfulness and misery of an unregenerate state than this does. The carnal mind, the friendship of the world, are enmity to God, and God hates all the workers of iniquity; and it is easy to foresee what this will end in, if the quarrel be not taken up in time, Isa 27:4, Isa 27:5.

V.Christ's rejecting them as incurable, and leaving them their house desolate, Mat 23:38.

The things of their peace are now hidden from their eyes, because they knew not the day of their visitation. Here we have,

1.The sentence of their rejection passed (Zac 11:9): "Then said I, I will not feed you. I will take no further care of you; you shall not see me again; take your own course. As I will not feed you, so I will not cure you; that that dieth, let it die (the Shepherd will do nothing to save its forfeited life); that that is to be cut off, let it be cut off; that which will make itself a prey to the wolf, let it be a prey, and let the rest so far forget their own mild and gentle nature as to eat the flesh of one another; let these sheep fight like dogs." Those that reject Christ will be certainly and justly rejected by him, and then are miserable of course.

2.A sign of it given (Zac 11:10): I took my staff, even Beauty, and cut it asunder, in token of this, that he would be no longer a shepherd to them, as the lord high steward determines his commission by breaking his white staff, and as Moses's breaking the tables of the law put a stop, for the present, to the treaty between God and Israel. The breaking of this staff signified the breaking of God's covenant which he had made with all the people, the covenant of peculiarity made with all the tribes of Israel, and all other people who, by being proselyted to their religion, were incorporated into their nation. The Jewish church was now stripped of all its glory; its crown was profaned and cast to the ground, and all its honour laid in the dust; for God departed from it, and would no more own it for his. When Christ told them plainly that the kingdom of God should be taken from them, and given to another people, then be broke the staff of Beauty, Mat 21:43. And it was broken in that day, though Jerusalem and the Jewish nation held up forty years longer, yet from that day we may reckon the staff of Beauty broken, Zac 11:11. And though the great men did not, or would not, understand it as a divine sentence, but thought to put it by with a cold God forbid (Luk 20:16), yet the poor of the flock, the disciples of Christ, that waited on him, and understood with what authority he spoke, and could distinguish the voice of their Shepherd from that of a stranger, knew that it was the word of the Lord, and trembled at it, and were confident that it should not fall to the ground. Note, Christ is waited on by the poor of the flock; he chose them to be with him, to be his pupils, to be his witnesses; the poor received him and his gospel, when those that had great possessions turned their backs upon him. And those that wait upon Christ, that sit at his feet, to hear and receive his words, shall know of the doctrine whether it be of God, Joh 7:17.

3.A further reason given for their rejection. It was said before, Their souls abhorred him; and here we have an instance of it, their buying and selling him for thirty pieces of silver, either thirty Roman pence, or rather thirty Jewish shekels; this is here foretold in somewhat obscure expressions, as it is fit that such particular prophecies should be delivered, lest otherwise the plainness of the prophecy might prevent the accomplishment of it. Here,

(1.)The Shepherd comes to them for his wages (Zac 11:12): "If you think good, give me my price; you are weary of me, pay me off and discharge me; and, if not, forbear; if you be willing to continue me longer in your service, I will continue, or, if to turn me off without wages, I am content." Christ was no hireling, and yet the labourer is worthy of his hire. Compare with this what Christ said to Judas when he was going to sell him, "What thou doest do quickly; be at a word with the chief priests; let them either take the bargain or leave it," Joh 13:27. Those that betray Christ are not forced to it; they might have chosen.

(2.)They value him at thirty pieces of silver. Many years' service he had done them as a Shepherd, yet this is all they will now turn him off with - "A goodly price that I with all my care and pains was valued at by them." If Judas fixed this sum in his demand, it is observable that his name was Judah, the same name with that of the body of the people, for it was a national act; or, if (as it rather seems) the chief priests pitched upon this sum in their proffers, they were the representatives of the people; it was part of the priest's office to put a value upon the devoted things (Lev 27:8), and thus they valued the Lord Jesus. it was the ordinary price of a slave, Exo 21:32. Making light of Christ, and undervaluing the love of that great and good Shepherd, are the ruin of multitudes, and justly so.

(3.)The silver being no way proportionable to his worth, it is thrown to the potter with disdain: "Let him take it to buy clay with, or for any use that a little money will serve to, for it is not worth hoarding; it may be enough for a potter's stock, but not for the pay of such a shepherd, much less for his purchase." So the prophet cast the thirty pieces of silver to the potter in the house of the Lord: "Let him take them, and do what he will with them." Now we find a particular accomplishment of this in the history of Christ's sufferings, and reference is had to this prophecy, Mat 27:9, Mat 27:10. Thirty pieces of silver was the very sum for which Christ was sold to the chief priests; the money, when Judas would not keep it, and the chief priests would not take it back was laid out in the purchase of the potter's field. Even that sudden resolve of the chief priests was according to an ancient prophecy and the more ancient counsel and foreknowledge of God.

4.The completing of their rejection in the cutting asunder of the other staff, Zac 11:14. The former denoted the ruin of their church, by breaking the covenant between God and them - that defaced their beauty; this denotes the ruin of their state, by breaking the brotherhood between Judah and Israel, by reviving animosities and contention among them, such as were of old between Judah and Israel, the writing of whom as one stick in the hand of the Lord was one of the blessings promised after their return out of captivity, Eze 37:19. But that union shall now be dissolved; they shall be crumbled into parties and factions, exasperated one against another; and their kingdom, being thus divided, shall be brought to desolation.

(1.)Nothing ruins a people so certainly, so inevitably, as the breaking of the staff of Bands, and the weakening of the brotherhood among them; for hereby they become an easy prey to the common enemy.

(2.)This follows upon the dissolving of the covenant between God and them, and the decay of religion among them. When iniquity abounds love waxes cold. No wonder if those fall out among themselves that have provoked God to fall out with them. When the staff of Beauty is broken the staff of Bands will not hold long. An unchurched people will soon be an undone people.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Historical Reception

One surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.

1 quote · AD 420
AD 420JeromePost-NiceneSourceCommentary on Zechariah
(Vers. 10, 11.) And I took my staff, which was called Beauty, and I cut it in two to break the covenant that I had made with all the peoples. And it was broken on that day, so the poor of the flock, who were watching me, knew that it was the word of the Lord. LXX: And I will take my beautiful staff and throw it away, to break the covenant that I had made with all the peoples, and it will be broken on that day, and the Canaanites will know that the sheep, which are being watched, are the word of the Lord. After the calling of the Israelites and the assumption of the second rod, which was called a cord, the Lord took the first rod, called "glory," and cut them off from his worship, because they worshipped idols, and all turned aside, becoming useless together (Psalm 14). And in order to make it more clear what this rod was, he added: "So that I might nullify my covenant which I made with all the people: For as soon as Israel was assumed, the multitude of the nations was cast aside: and as the daughter of the Archisynagogue was born, who is later narrated in the Gospel to be twelve years old, she began to bleed and suffer from a permanent illness (Mark 5; Matthew 9). And it was rendered null and void, he said, the covenant which I had made with all the nations. And the poor of the flock, that is, the people of Israel who keep my commandments, understood that the word of the Lord, that is, the will of the Lord, is to reject the nations that deny Him and to accept the Israelites in the line of Abraham. Because we have interpreted it, and the poor of the flock understood it thus, the Seventy translated it, and the Canaanites will know, the sheep that are entrusted to me, that some have explained: The people of the Jews will know, to whom it was said: The seed of Canaan, and not of Judah (Dan. XIII, 56); who now keep my ceremonies: whether because the Canaanites interpret it as being ready for humility, they will know those who were once ready to be humbled by the Lord and be left behind. But why they insulted us, poor people, for what we have interpreted, the reason is clear: among the Hebrews, thus, Chen () is said: Anie (), poor people; they connect those two words together, for what it is, thus poor people, that is, Chen Anie (, the name of the Canaanite people has been interpreted.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Zechariah 11:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.