### Core Meaning & Semantic Range
The Greek word **anákrisis**, represented by `{{G351}}`, refers to a **(judicial) investigation** or **examination**. It appears only **1 time** in **1 unique verse** in the Bible. The term denotes a formal inquiry or scrutiny, specifically within a legal or official context, for the purpose of determining facts.
### Biblical Occurrences & Contextual Analysis
In its sole biblical appearance, `{{G351}}` is used in a specific legal proceeding. In [[Acts 25:26]], the Roman governor Festus presents Paul to King Agrippa. Festus explains that he has no certain `{{G804}}` charge to send with the prisoner to his lord. Therefore, he has arranged the hearing so that "after **examination** had, I might have somewhat to write" [[Acts 25:26]]. The word here describes the formal process of questioning intended to produce a clear, official report.
### Related Words & Concepts
Several related words in the surrounding text clarify the context of this judicial investigation:
* `{{G804}}` **asphalḗs** (secure, certain, safe, sure): This word highlights the reason for the examination. Festus has "no **certain** thing" to report, which necessitates the formal inquiry to establish a secure basis for his letter [[Acts 25:26]].
* `{{G1125}}` **gráphō** (to "grave", especially to write): This is the stated goal of the **examination**. Festus needs to conduct the inquiry so that he will have something **to write** to his superior [[Acts 25:26]]. The word is frequently used for official records and scripture itself [[Luke 24:44]].
* `{{G935}}` **basileús** (a sovereign, king): The investigation is conducted before high authority, specifically **king** Agrippa `{{G67}}`. This establishes the formal, official, and magisterial setting in which the **examination** takes place [[Acts 25:26]].
### Theological Significance
While used in a secular legal context, the appearance of `{{G351}}` carries underlying theological implications:
* **Testimony Before Authority:** The **examination** provides a formal setting for the apostle's defense. The proceedings before a **king** `{{G935}}` like Agrippa `{{G67}}` demonstrate how the apostolic mission engaged with the highest levels of human authority [[Acts 25:26]].
* **The Clarity of the Christian Case:** Festus's need for a "certain" `{{G804}}` charge to **write** `{{G1125}}` highlights the ambiguity of the accusations against Paul. The **examination** becomes a forum to clarify the truth, distinguishing the Christian faith from a criminal matter.
* **Divine Purpose in Human Processes:** The judicial **examination** is initiated for human reasons—so Festus can file a report. However, it serves a divine purpose by bringing the gospel before rulers, underscoring the idea that even secular legal proceedings can be instruments for God's plan.
### Summary
In summary, `{{G351}}` **anákrisis** is a precise term for a (judicial) **examination**. Though it appears only once, its context in [[Acts 25:26]] is highly specific: a formal hearing to establish facts where none were certain. The event was prompted by a governor's need to file a proper report but ultimately placed the apostle Paul before King Agrippa. It illustrates how a formal legal procedure became a critical opportunity for testimony within the biblical narrative.
TRV