But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say? [Is] God unrighteous who taketh vengeance? (I speak as a man)
But {G1161} if {G1487} our {G2257} unrighteousness {G93} commend {G4921} the righteousness {G1343} of God {G2316}, what {G5101} shall we say {G2046}?{G3361} Is God {G2316} unrighteous {G94} who taketh {G2018} vengeance {G3709}?(I speak {G3004} as {G2596} a man {G444})
Now if our unrighteousness highlights God’s righteousness, what should we say? That God is unrighteous to inflict his anger on us? (I am speaking here the way people commonly do.)
But if our unrighteousness highlights the righteousness of God, what shall we say? That God is unjust to inflict His wrath on us? I am speaking in human terms.
But if our unrighteousness commendeth the righteousness of God, what shall we say? Is God unrighteous who visiteth with wrath? (I speak after the manner of men.)
-
Romans 6:19
I speak after the manner of men because of the infirmity of your flesh: for as ye have yielded your members servants to uncleanness and to iniquity unto iniquity; even so now yield your members servants to righteousness unto holiness. -
Galatians 3:15
Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though [it be] but a man's covenant, yet [if it be] confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto. -
1 Corinthians 9:8
Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? -
Romans 9:18
Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will [have mercy], and whom he will he hardeneth. -
Romans 9:20
Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed [it], Why hast thou made me thus? -
Nahum 1:2
¶ God [is] jealous, and the LORD revengeth; the LORD revengeth, and [is] furious; the LORD will take vengeance on his adversaries, and he reserveth [wrath] for his enemies. -
Romans 4:1
¶ What shall we say then that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found?
Romans 3:5 is part of Paul's intricate argument in the book of Romans, where he systematically lays out the doctrine of justification by faith. In this verse, he anticipates and addresses a potential objection that might arise from his previous statements about the universal sinfulness of humanity and the contrasting righteousness of God.
Context
Leading up to this verse, Paul has established that both Jews and Gentiles are under the power of sin (Romans 3:9). He has quoted Old Testament scriptures to demonstrate the pervasive nature of human unrighteousness (Romans 3:10-18). The immediate context is Paul's discussion of the advantage of being Jewish (having the oracles of God entrusted to them) and yet concluding that their unfaithfulness does not nullify God's faithfulness. Romans 3:5 presents a hypothetical human argument against God's justice: If human sin somehow serves to highlight or "commend" God's righteousness, does that make God unjust for punishing sin?
Key Themes
Linguistic Insights
Reflection and Application
Romans 3:5 forces us to confront the absolute nature of God's righteousness and the seriousness of human sin. The human argument presented here attempts to minimize sin by suggesting it has a positive outcome (making God look good). However, Paul will firmly reject this idea. Our sin never justifies or excuses itself; it only demonstrates our need for God's mercy and a righteousness that comes from Him, not ourselves (Romans 3:21-22). God's judgment on sin is just because He is perfectly righteous, regardless of how our sin might inadvertently highlight His character by contrast.
Understanding this verse helps us appreciate the depth of human fallenness—that we are truly under sin (Romans 3:23)—and the necessity of God's just response to it. It underscores that salvation is not about our merit proving God's goodness, but about God's grace overcoming our unrighteousness.