Skip to content

Psalm 77:5

“Questioning God's Faithfulness”Psalm 77:5–9

King James Version
I have considered the days of old, the years of ancient times.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
I have considered H2803 the days H3117 of old H6924, the years H8141 of ancient times H5769.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
I considered the days of old, the years long in the past.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
I have considered the days of old, The years of ancient times.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
I have considered the days of old, the years of ancient times.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
Then I considered the daies of olde, and the yeeres of ancient time.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
I have reckoned the days of old, The years of the ages.

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
5 Hebrew words
  1. חִשַּׁבְתִּיchi·Shav·tiI thought aboutH2803V-Piel-Perf-1csVerb Piel Perfect 1st Singular common gender
  2. יָמִיםya·MimdaysH3117N-mpNoun Plural Masculine Absolute
  3. מִקֶּדֶםmi·Ke·demfrom antiquityH6924Prep-m ¦ N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absoluteמִfromקֶּדֶםantiquity
  4. שְׁנוֹתShe·Notyears ofH8141N-fpcNoun Plural Feminine Construct
  5. עוֹלָמִיםo·la·Mimantiquiti[es]H5769N-mpNoun Plural Masculine Absolute
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
In the KJVVerse 15,099 of 31,102 · 48.5%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

In his distress Asaph turns his mind on purpose to the distant past, the days and years when God acted for his people.

“I have considered”

The verb châshab means to think, regard or reckon. Asaph turns his mind on purpose, in the middle of his distress.

“the days of old,”

Yôwm here means eras long past, the times of God’s great acts for Israel, such as the going out of Egypt and the covenant at Sinai.

“the years of ancient times.”

ʻÔwlâm is time out of mind, here looking back. The same word comes back as “for ever” in verse 7, where it looks ahead.

Passage studyPsalm 77:5–9

Honest Questions to God in a Sleepless Night

5I have considered the days of old, the years of ancient times. 6I call to remembrance my song in the night: I commune with mine own heart: and my spirit made diligent search. 7Will the Lord cast off for ever? and will he be favourable no more? 8Is his mercy clean gone for ever? doth his promise fail for evermore? 9Hath God forgotten to be gracious? hath he in anger shut up his tender mercies? Selah.

Summary

Asaph lies awake in trouble and turns his mind to the past. He thinks over the days of old, remembers the song he once had in the night, talks with his own heart and searches for an answer. Then the questions come, six of them in three verses: will the Lord cast off for ever, will he be favourable no more, is his mercy clean gone, does his promise fail, has God forgotten to be gracious, has he in anger shut up his tender mercies? A Selah closes them. These verses put into words the darkest fear a believer can have, and God has kept them in Scripture for his people to pray. Every question is spoken to God himself, and the rest of the psalm, together with the whole Bible, answers each one.

Where these verses fall in Psalm 77

Psalm 77 is one of the psalms of Asaph, the group that runs from Psalm 73 to Psalm 83, and those psalms often move from honest complaint to a fresh look at who God is and what he has done. Asaph was a Levite whom David appointed to lead Israel’s worship with music before the ark (1 Chronicles 16:4–5). He was also a seer, and his sons prophesied with music under his direction (1 Chronicles 25:1–2). The psalm leaves its trouble unnamed. It may have been a national disaster or a private affliction, and its words fit both.

The opening verses (Psalm 77:1–4) show a man crying aloud to God, sleepless, overwhelmed in spirit and refusing to be comforted. Even remembering God has brought him no relief yet. Our five verses come next. In verses 5 and 6 he deliberately turns to remembering and searching, and in verses 7 to 9 that search breaks out into questions. The rest of the psalm (Psalm 77:10–20) turns to the mighty works of God, above all the deliverance from Egypt, and ends in renewed trust.

So the remembering of verses 5 and 6 leads straight into the questions, and at this point the memory of better days sharpens his pain. Yet it is the right road. When he takes it further and fixes his mind on the works of the LORD himself, the psalm turns from lament to praise.

Thinking over the days of old

“I have considered the days of old, the years of ancient times.” The verb châshab properly means to plait or weave together, and from there it means to think, regard, value or reckon. Asaph is weighing the past on purpose, turning it over in his mind. The two phrases say the same thing twice, as Hebrew poetry often does, and together they reach back across the whole long history of God with his people.

The word for days, yôwm, means a day or a span of time, and in “days of old” it means the eras of long ago. The word behind “ancient times”, ʻôwlâm, properly means what is hidden or out of sight, time out of mind, and it can look either backward or forward, which is why it is often translated “everlasting”. Here it looks back to the most distant past. The same word returns in verse 7 as “for ever”. The man who has just looked back across time out of mind now fears that God’s rejection will stretch just as far ahead.

For an Israelite the days of old meant the founding acts of God: the Passover and the going out of Egypt (Exodus 12), the crossing of the sea (Exodus 14), the covenant at Sinai (Exodus 19), and God’s care of his people in the wilderness and his bringing them into the land. Remembering these things lay at the heart of Israel’s worship and hope. Moses had told the people, “Remember the days of old, consider the years of many generations: ask thy father, and he will shew thee; thy elders, and they will tell thee” (Deuteronomy 32:7). Asaph, a worship leader steeped in that history, does exactly this. The God who acted then is the same God now, and the New Testament says the same of the Son: “Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever” (Hebrews 13:8).

A song in the night and a searching heart

Verse 6 moves inward in three steps, each going deeper than the one before. Asaph remembers, then talks with his own heart, then searches with his whole spirit.

“I call to remembrance my song in the night.” The night of this psalm is both the literal sleepless night of verses 2 to 4 and the darkness of his trouble. The song he remembers is most likely a past time when God gave him praise or comfort in the dark. It may have been a real song sung in the night hours, or a time when God’s help moved him to thanksgiving. Now the night has come again, and he remembers that once it held a song.

“I commune with mine own heart.” The verb sîyach means to ponder, muse or converse, and it also means to complain, which suits a man pouring out a lament. The heart, lêbâb, is the inmost part of a person, the seat of thought, will and moral character as well as feeling. So Asaph is thinking the whole matter through with all that he is. The spirit (rûwach) in the next phrase names the same whole inner person.

“And my spirit made diligent search.” The verb châphas means to search out, examine or explore. His spirit is looking hard for understanding, for an answer to God’s silence, and for God himself. Scripture promises that such seeking is answered. Moses told Israel they would find the LORD “if thou seek him with all thy heart and with all thy soul” (Deuteronomy 4:29), and God says through Jeremiah, “And ye shall seek me, and find me, when ye shall search for me with all your heart” (Jeremiah 29:13). Isaiah puts the night and the spirit together as Asaph does: “With my soul have I desired thee in the night; yea, with my spirit within me will I seek thee early” (Isaiah 26:9).

Is communing with your own heart self-pity?

Communing with your own heart in Scripture is honest reflection before God, a person thinking through his thoughts, feelings and doubts in the open. David tells the people to “commune with your own heart upon your bed, and be still” (Psalm 4:4), and Jeremiah says, “Let us search and try our ways, and turn again to the LORD” (Lamentations 3:40). What keeps such searching healthy is where it is aimed. Asaph searches for God, and in the end it brings him to God’s works. Another psalmist speaks to his own soul in the same way: “Why art thou cast down, O my soul? and why art thou disquieted in me? hope thou in God: for I shall yet praise him for the help of his countenance” (Psalm 42:5). In Lamentations, after long grief, the writer says, “This I recall to my mind, therefore have I hope” (Lamentations 3:21).

Six questions about who God is

Verses 7 to 9 hold six questions, set in three pairs, and in each pair the second line repeats and sharpens the first. Asaph asks them to pour out his fear and to plead with God, and every one of them asks whether something God is known to be has come to an end: his favour, his mercy, his promise, his grace and his compassion. The words “for ever”, “no more” and “for evermore” carry the weight of his pain, which makes the present feel permanent.

The questions also show what Asaph knows. He could only fear the loss of God’s favour, mercy and faithfulness because he had known God to be favourable, merciful and faithful. His fear is about how things look in his trouble, and the God he questions is the God he trusts enough to question.

Will the Lord cast off for ever?

The verb for “cast off”, zânach, means to push aside, reject or forsake. For a people whose whole identity and safety rested on their covenant with the LORD, to be cast off was the most frightening thing imaginable, and “for ever” (ʻôwlâm again) makes it worse by asking whether the rejection will last without end.

The second question asks whether God will be “favourable no more”. The verb râtsâh means to be pleased with, to accept, to show goodwill or delight in someone. It is often used of offerings that God accepts, so the fear reaches as far as whether God still accepts his people, their worship and their prayers. God’s favour was the source of their life and security, and Asaph asks whether it is gone.

Is his mercy clean gone for ever?

“Mercy” is cheçed, God’s steadfast love and covenant loyalty, a committed and enduring love at the centre of his bond with his people. “Clean gone” is ʼâphêç, to disappear or cease, to come to a complete end. “For ever” here is netsach, a word of long duration, usually “continually”. Asaph is asking whether the love that defines God’s dealings with Israel has vanished for good.

God had shown that love over and over. Moses sang, “Thou in thy mercy hast led forth the people which thou hast redeemed” (Exodus 15:13), and God had given his promises to Abraham (Genesis 12:1–3) and to David (2 Samuel 7:12–16).

“Doth his promise fail for evermore?” The word for promise, ʼômer, comes from the verb “to say” and means what God has said, his word or declaration. “Fail” is gâmar, to end or come to an end, and the same verb can mean to complete or perform. “For evermore” is built on dôwr, generation or age, so the fear stretches across all generations to come. The same word stands on the other side of the question in Psalm 100, which sets God’s everlasting mercy beside his truth that “endureth to all generations” (Psalm 100:5). The pair in verse 8 joins who God is, his mercy, with what he has said, his promise, and Asaph fears that both have failed together.

Hath God forgotten to be gracious?

Strong’s places the word for “to be gracious” with channôwth, a noun meaning supplication, which comes from chanan, to be gracious or to show favour. The KJV gives it as the act of being gracious, and the question asks whether God has forgotten to show favour to the people who plead with him. To forget would mean that God had stopped being who he is, the gracious One, and the question is so dark because Asaph knows that cannot be.

“Hath he in anger shut up his tender mercies?” The verb qâphats means to draw together, close or shut, the picture of a hand or a door closed on purpose. “Tender mercies” is racham, a plural noun for compassion, related to rechem, the womb. It speaks of a deep, felt compassion, like a mother’s for her child. The two questions of verse 9 name the two things Asaph fears: that God has forgotten, or that God is angry and has deliberately closed off his compassion.

Selah

The word çelâh appears 71 times in the Psalms and three times in Habakkuk. Its exact meaning is uncertain, and it is widely understood as a musical or worship direction, most likely a pause. Here it falls straight after the hardest questions in the psalm, and it holds them in silence for a moment before the turn of verse 10.

Is it wrong to ask God questions like these?

Scripture records these questions as prayer, asked by a leader of Israel’s worship and kept in the book God gave his people to pray, so we may bring the same honest questions to God. Laments like Psalm 13 do the same, and Job and Jeremiah also wrestled openly with God in their pain. Lament was a recognised part of Israel’s prayer, a way to bring pain, confusion and even complaint before a God who hears.

Asaph brings his fear to God and keeps talking to him, and that itself is an act of faith. What matters is where the questions lead. He moves through them to remembering, and he resolves to remember the works of the LORD and to meditate on all that God has done (Psalm 77:11–12). Doubt left to itself can wear faith down, but doubt carried to God and then to his works becomes a road to deeper trust.

How Scripture answers every question

The psalm answers Asaph by turning him to what God has done, beginning in Psalm 77:10. The rest of Scripture answers each question in plain words.

To “Will the Lord cast off for ever?” God answers through Isaiah, “Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? yea, they may forget, yet will I not forget thee” (Isaiah 49:15). He also says, “I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee” (Hebrews 13:5), and Paul is persuaded that nothing in all creation “shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord” (Romans 8:38–39).

To “Is his mercy clean gone for ever?” Lamentations, written in the ruins of Jerusalem, replies, “It is of the LORD’s mercies that we are not consumed, because his compassions fail not. They are new every morning: great is thy faithfulness” (Lamentations 3:22–23).

To “Doth his promise fail for evermore?” Scripture says, “God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent” (Numbers 23:19), and “the word of our God shall stand for ever” (Isaiah 40:8). What God says accomplishes what he sends it to do (Isaiah 55:11).

To “Hath God forgotten to be gracious?” God’s own name answers: “The LORD, The LORD God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth” (Exodus 34:6–7). He says of himself, “For I am the LORD, I change not” (Malachi 3:6). His grace and tender mercies belong to who he is, and he keeps them.

The answer in Christ

Every one of Asaph’s questions is answered most fully in Jesus Christ. The fear of being cast off is what Christ took on himself at the cross, when he cried, “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” (Matthew 27:46). He bore that forsakenness as “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29), so that all who are in him are accepted and will never be cast off. He lives for ever as our priest, and “he ever liveth to make intercession for them” (Hebrews 7:24–25).

God’s mercy is shown most clearly in the gift of his Son: “God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son” (John 3:16), and “God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8). Far from shutting up his tender mercies, “He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give us all things?” (Romans 8:32). In Christ “God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself” (2 Corinthians 5:19), and the Word made flesh came “full of grace and truth” (John 1:14).

God’s promise is kept in Christ, for “all the promises of God in him are yea, and in him Amen” (2 Corinthians 1:20). At the Last Supper Jesus said, “This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you” (Luke 22:20). Christ is the mediator of a better covenant, established on better promises (Hebrews 8:6), in which God writes his laws on his people’s hearts and remembers their sins no more (Hebrews 8:10–12).

Asaph’s diligent search for God also ends in Christ. Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6). He is the image of the invisible God (Colossians 1:15), and God, who spoke in many ways through the prophets, “hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son” (Hebrews 1:1–2). The song in the night that Asaph longed for is now the song of redemption that the church sings “in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs” (Colossians 3:16).

Jesus knows this kind of night from the inside. In Gethsemane, “being in an agony he prayed more earnestly: and his sweat was as it were great drops of blood falling down to the ground” (Luke 22:44). So we have a high priest who is touched with the feeling of our infirmities, and we may come boldly to the throne of grace to obtain mercy and find grace to help in time of need (Hebrews 4:15–16). He still says, “Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest” (Matthew 11:28).

Remembering God in the dark

These verses give you words for the nights when God feels far away. You can take your fears to him as plainly as Asaph did, naming what you dread, and trust that he hears. Your feelings in those hours are real, and God’s character stays the same through them.

Asaph also shows where to go next. Think over the days of old as Scripture tells them, the deliverance from Egypt, the cross and the empty tomb. Recall your own songs in the night, the times God has helped and comforted you before. Let the Selah have its place too, a pause to be still before God. The same God who acted then is gracious now, his mercy is new every morning, and in Christ every one of these six questions has its answer.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Psalm 77:1–10. He set out his notes in a three-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 10 verses
Passage under commentPsalm 77:1–10
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

We have here the lively portraiture of a good man under prevailing melancholy, fallen into and sinking in that horrible pit and that miry clay, but struggling to get out. Drooping saints, that are of a sorrowful spirit, may here as in a glass see their own faces. The conflict which the psalmist had with his griefs and fears seems to have been over when he penned this record of it; for he says (Psalm 77:1), I cried unto God, and he gave ear unto me, which, while the struggle lasted, he had not the comfortable sense of, as he had afterwards; but he inserts it in the beginning of his narrative as an intimation that his trouble did not end in despair; for God heard him, and, at length, he knew that he heard him. Observe,

I.His melancholy prayers.

Being afflicted, he prayed (James 5:13), and, being in an agony, he prayed more earnestly (Psalm 77:1): My voice was unto God, and I cried, even with my voice unto God. He was full of complaints, loud complaints, but he directed them to God, and turned them all into prayers, vocal prayers, very earnest and importunate. Thus he gave vent to his grief and gained some ease; and thus he took the right way in order to relief (Psalm 77:2): In the day of my trouble I sought the Lord. Note, Days of trouble must be days of prayer, days of inward trouble especially, when God seems to have withdrawn from us; we must seek him and seek till we find him. In the day of his trouble he did not seek for the diversion of business or recreation, to shake off his trouble that way, but he sought God, and his favour and grace. Those that are under trouble of mind must not think to drink it away, or laugh it away, but must pray it away. My hand was stretched out in the night and ceased not; so Dr. Hammond reads the following words, as speaking the incessant importunity of his prayers. Compare Psalm 143:5, Psalm 143:6.

II.His melancholy grief. Grief may then be called melancholy indeed,

1.When it admits of no intermission; such was his: My sore, or wound, ran in the night, and bled inwardly, and it ceased not, no, not in the time appointed for rest and sleep.

2.When it admits of no consolation; and that also as his case: My soul refused to be comforted; he had no mind to hearken to those that would be his comforters. As vinegar upon nitre, so is he that sings songs to a heavy heart, Proverbs 25:20. Nor had he any mind to think of those things that would be his comforts; he put them far from him, as one that indulged himself in sorrow. Those that are in sorrow, upon any account, do not only prejudice themselves, but affront God, if they refuse to be comforted.

III.His melancholy musings. He pored so much upon the trouble, whatever it was, personal or public, that,

1.The methods that should have relieved him did but increase his grief, Psalm 77:3.

(1.)One would have thought that the remembrance of God would comfort him, but it did not: I remembered God and was troubled, as poor Job (Job 23:15); I am troubled at his presence; when I consider I am afraid of him. When he remembered God his thoughts fastened only upon his justice, and wrath, and dreadful majesty, and thus God himself became a terror to him.

(2.)One would have thought that pouring out his soul before God would give him ease, but it did not; he complained, and yet his spirit was overwhelmed, and sank under the load.

2.The means of his present relief were denied him, v. 4. He could not enjoy sleep, which, if it be quiet and refreshing, is a parenthesis to our griefs and cares: "Thou holdest my eyes waking with thy terrors, which make me full of tossings to and fro until the dawning of the day." He could not speak, by reason of the disorder of his thoughts, the tumult of his spirits, and the confusion his mind was in: He kept silence even from good while his heart was hot within him; he was ready to burst like a new bottle (Job 32:19), and yet so troubled that he could not speak and refresh himself. Grief never preys so much upon the spirits as when it is thus smothered and pent up.

IV.His melancholy reflections (Psalm 77:5, Psalm 77:6):

"I have considered the days of old, and compared them with the present days; and our former prosperity does but aggravate our present calamities: for we see not the wonders that our fathers told us off." Melancholy people are apt to pore altogether upon the days of old and the years of ancient times, and to magnify them, for the justifying of their own uneasiness and discontent at the present posture of affairs. But say not thou that the former days were better than these, because it is more than thou knowest whether they were or no, Ecclesiastes 7:10. Neither let the remembrance of the comforts we have lost make us unthankful for those that are left, or impatient under our crosses. Particularly, he called to remembrance his song in the night, the comforts with which he had supported himself in his former sorrows and entertained himself in his former solitude. These songs he remembered, and tried if he could not sing them over again; but he was out of tune for them, and the remembrance of them did but pour out his soul in him, Psalm 43:4. See Job 35:10.

V.His melancholy fears and apprehensions:

"I communed with my own heart, Psalm 77:6. Come, my soul, what will be the issue of these things? What can I think of them and what can I expect they will come to at last? I made diligent search into the causes of my trouble, enquiring wherefore God contended with me and what would be the consequences of it. And thus I began to reason, Will the Lord cast off for ever, as he does for the present? He is not now favourable; and will he be favourable no more? His mercy is now gone; and is it clean gone for ever? His promise now fails; and does it fail for evermore? God is not now gracious; but has he forgotten to be gracious? His tender mercies have been withheld, perhaps in wisdom; but are they shut up, shut up in anger?" Psalm 77:7-9. This is the language of a disconsolate deserted soul, walking in darkness and having no light, a case not uncommon even with those that fear the Lord and obey the voice of his servant, Isaiah 50:10. He may here be looked upon,

1.As groaning under a sore trouble. God hid his face from him, and withdrew the usual tokens of his favour. Note, Spiritual trouble is of all trouble most grievous to a gracious soul; nothing wounds and pierces it like the apprehensions of God's being angry, the suspending of his favour and the superseding of his promise; this wounds the spirit; and who can bear that?

2.As grappling with a strong temptation. Note, God's own people, in a cloudy and dark day, may be tempted to make desperate conclusions about their own spiritual state and the condition of God's church and kingdom in the world, and, as to both, to give up all for gone. We may be tempted to think that God has abandoned us and cast us off, that the covenant of grace fails us, and that the tender mercy of our God shall be for ever withheld from us. But we must not give way to such suggestions as these. If fear and melancholy ask such peevish questions, let faith answer them from the Scripture: Will the Lord cast off for ever? God forbid, Romans 11:1. No; the Lord will not cast off his people, Psalm 94:14. Will he be favourable no more? Yes, he will; for, though he cause grief, yet will he have compassion, Lamentations 3:32. Is his mercy clean gone for ever? No; his mercy endures for ever; as it is from everlasting, it is to everlasting, Psalm 103:17. Doth his promise fail for evermore? No; it is impossible for God to lie, Hebrews 6:18. Hath God forgotten to be gracious? No; he cannot deny himself, and his own name which he hath proclaimed gracious and merciful, Exodus 34:6. Has he in anger shut up his tender mercies? No; they are new every morning (Lamentations 3:23); and therefore, How shall I give thee up, Ephraim? Hosea 11:8, Hosea 11:9. Thus was he going on with his dark and dismal apprehensions when, on a sudden, he first checked himself with that word, Selah, "Stop there; go no further; let us hear no more of these unbelieving surmises;" and he then chid himself (Psalm 77:10): I said, This is my infirmity. He is soon aware that it is not well said, and therefore, "Why art thou cast down, O my soul? I said, This is my affliction" (so some understand it); "This is the calamity that falls to my lot and I must make the best of it; every one has his affliction, his trouble in the flesh; and this is mine, the cross I must take up." Or, rather, "This is my sin; it is my iniquity, the plague of my own heart." These doubts and fears proceed from the want and weakness of faith and the corruption of a distempered mind. note, (1.) We all know that concerning ourselves of which we must say, "This is our infirmity, a sin that most easily besets us." (2.) Despondency of spirit, and distrust of God, under affliction, are too often the infirmities of good people, and, as such, are to be reflected upon by us with sorrow and shame, as by the psalmist here: This is my infirmity. When at any time it is working in us we must thus suppress the rising of it, and not suffer the evil spirit to speak. We must argue down the insurrections of unbelief, as the psalmist here: But I will remember the years of the right hand of the Most High. He had been considering the years of ancient times (Psalm 77:5), the blessings formerly enjoyed, the remembrance of which did only add to his grief; but now he considered them as the years of the right hand of the Most High, that those blessings of ancient times came from the Ancient of days, from the power and sovereign disposal of his right hand who is over all, God, blessed for ever, and this satisfied him; for may not the Most High with his right hand make what changes he pleases?

Historical interpretation

Two Centuries of Reception

4 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

4 quotes · AD 395–604
Post-NiceneEarly Medieval
400500600

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

d. AD 395Gregory of NyssaPost-NiceneSourceAGAINST EUNOMIUS 6:3
Sufficient defense has been offered on these points, and as for that which Eunomius says by way of calumny against our doctrine, that “Christ was emptied to become himself” there has been sufficient discussion in what has been said above, where he has been shown to be attributing to our doctrine his own blasphemy. For a person who believes that the unchangeable [divine] nature has put on the created and perishable [human nature] is not one who speaks of the transition from like to like but one who believes that the divine nature does not change into the more lowly [human nature]. For if, as their doctrine asserts, he is created, and a human being is created also, the wonder of the doctrine disappears, and there is nothing marvelous in what is alleged, since the created nature comes to be in itself. But we who have learned from prophecy of “the change of the right hand of the Most High”—and by the “Right Hand” of the Father we understand that power of God, which made all things, which is the Lord (not in the sense of depending on him as a part upon a whole but as being indeed from him and yet contemplated in individual existence)—say thus: that neither does the right hand vary from him whose right hand it is, in regard to the idea of its nature, nor can any other change in it be spoken of besides the accommodation to the flesh. For truly the right hand of God was God himself; manifested in the flesh, seen through that same flesh by those whose sight was clear; as he did the work of the Father, being, both in fact and in thought, the right hand of God, yet being changed, in respect of the veil of the flesh by which he was surrounded, as regarded that which was seen, from that which he was by nature, as a subject of contemplation. Therefore he says to Philip, who was gazing only at that which was changed, “Look through that which is changed to that which is unchangeable, and if you see this, you have seen that Father, whom you seek to see; for he that has seen me—not him who appears in a state of change, but my very self, who am in the Father—will have seen that Father in whom I am, because the very same character of Godhead is beheld in both.” If, then, we believe that the immortal and impassible and uncreated nature came to be in the nature of the creature that is capable of suffering, and conceive the “change” to consist in this, on what grounds are we charged with saying that he “set aside his divine powers to become incarnate,” by those who keep presenting their own statements about our doctrines? For the participation of the created with the created is no “change of the right hand.” To say that the right hand of the uncreated nature is created belongs to Eunomius alone and to those who adopt such opinions as he holds. For the person with an eye that looks on the truth will discern the right hand of the Highest to be such as he sees the Highest to be—Uncreated of Uncreated, Good of Good, Eternal of Eternal without prejudice to its eternity by its being in the Father by way of generation. Thus our accuser has unawares been employing against us reproaches that properly fall on himself.
"I have thought on ancient days" [Psalm 77:5]. Now he, as if he were one who had been beaten out of doors, has taken refuge within: he is conversing in the secret place of his own heart. And let him declare to us what he is doing there. It is well with him. Observe what things he is thinking of, I pray you. He is within, in his own house he is thinking of ancient days. No one says to him, you have spoken ill: no one says to him, you have spoken much: no one says to him, you have thought perversely. Thus may it be well with him, may God aid him: let him think of the ancient days, and let him tell us what he has done in his very inner chamber, whereunto he has arrived, over what he has leaped, where he has abode. "I have thought on ancient days; and of eternal years I have been mindful." What are eternal years? It is a mighty thought. See whether this thought requires anything but great silence. Apart from all noise without, from all tumult of things human let him remain quiet within, that would think of those eternal years. Are the years wherein we are eternal, or those wherein our ancestors have been, or those wherein our posterity are to be? Far be it that they should be esteemed eternal. For what part of these years does remain? Behold we speak and say, "in this year:" and what have we got of this year, save the one day wherein we are. For the former days of this year have already gone by, and are not to be had; but the future days have not yet come. In one day we are, and we say, in this year: nay rather say thou, today, if you desire to speak of anything present. For of the whole year what have you got that is present? Whatsoever thereof is past, is no longer; whatsoever thereof is future, is not yet: how then, "this year"? Amend the expression: say, today. You speak truth, henceforth I will say, "today." Again observe this too, how today the morning hours have already past, the future hours have not yet come. This too therefore amend: say, in this hour. And of this hour what have you got? Some moments thereof have already gone by, those that are future have not yet come. Say, in this moment. In what moment? While I am uttering syllables, if I shall speak two syllables, the latter does not sound until the former has gone by: in a word, in that same one syllable, if it chance to have two letters, the latter letter does not sound, until the former has gone by. What then have we got of these years? These years are changeable: the eternal years must be thought on, years that stand, that are not made up of days that come and depart; years whereof in another place the Scripture says to God, "But You are the Self-same, and Your years shall not fail." On these years this man that leaps over, not in babbling without, but in silence has thought.
d. AD 461Leo the GreatPost-NiceneSourceSERMON 27:2.2
What mind can understand this mystery, what tongue has the capability of explaining this grace? Iniquity turns back into innocence, oldness into newness. Strangers come into adoption, and foreigners enter on an inheritance. Godless people have started to be just, the covetous to be beneficent, the incontinent to be chaste, the “earthly” to be “heavenly.” What has effected “this change” but the “right hand of the Most High”? For “the Son of God came to undo the devil’s works.” He grafted himself into us and us into himself in such a way that God’s descent to human affairs became the elevation of human beings to those divine.
d. AD 604Gregory the DialogistEarly MedievalSourceLETTER 9:122
I cannot express in words, most excellent son, how much I am delighted with your work and your life. For on hearing of the power of a new miracle in our days, to wit, that the whole nation of the Goths has through your excellency been brought over from the error of the Arian heresy to the firmness of a right faith, one is disposed to exclaim with the prophet, “This is the change wrought by the right hand of the most High.” For whose breast, even though stony, would not, on hearing of so great a work, soften in praises of almighty God and love of your excellency? As for me, I declare that it delights me often to tell these things that have been done through you to my sons who consult with me, and often together with them I marvel at these things. These things also for the most part cause me to become critical of myself, in that I languish sluggish and unprofitable in listless ease, while kings are laboring in the gathering together of souls for the gains of the heavenly country.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Psalm 77:5 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8