Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
If I were hungry, I would not tell thee: for the world is mine, and the fulness thereof.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
If I were hungry H7456 H8799, I would not tell H559 H8799 thee: for the world H8398 is mine, and the fulness H4393 thereof.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
If I were hungry, I would not tell you; for the world is mine, and everything in it.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
If I were hungry, I would not tell you, for the world is Mine, and the fullness thereof.
Ask
American Standard Version
If I were hungry, I would not tell thee; For the world is mine, and the fulness thereof.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
If I were hungry, I would not tell you, for the world is mine, and all that is in it.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
If I bee hungry, I will not tell thee: for the world is mine, and all that therein is.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
If I am hungry I tell not to thee, For Mine is the world and its fulness.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Psalm 50:12 is a profound divine declaration, set within a dramatic courtroom scene, asserting God's absolute sovereignty, inherent self-sufficiency, and comprehensive ownership over all creation. It directly challenges any human misconception that God is dependent on human offerings, particularly animal sacrifices, for His sustenance or well-being. Instead, the verse powerfully underscores that the entire world and everything contained within it belongs exclusively to Him, rendering any notion of Him "needing" anything from humanity utterly absurd. This declaration highlights God's desire for worship rooted in a right heart of gratitude and obedience, rather than mere ritualistic obligation or a transactional exchange.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Psalm 50, penned by Asaph, unfolds as a majestic divine courtroom drama. God, the "Mighty One," summons heaven and earth to witness His judgment of Israel, not for neglecting sacrifices, but for misunderstanding their purpose and offering them with unrighteous hearts. The preceding verses Psalm 50:7-11 establish God's initial address, where He explicitly states that He does not consume the flesh of bulls or the blood of goats, for all creatures of the forest and the cattle on a thousand hills are already His. Verse 12 then serves as the foundational theological premise for this assertion, logically explaining why God has no need for such offerings: He already owns everything. The subsequent verses Psalm 50:13-15 pivot to what God truly desires from His people: thanksgiving, fulfilled vows, and calling upon Him in times of trouble, emphasizing a spiritual, relational worship over superficial ritual.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: This psalm was composed during a period when the sacrificial system, as prescribed by the Mosaic Law, was central to Israelite worship. In the broader ancient Near Eastern context, it was common for pagan deities to be depicted as needing food and drink from their worshippers to sustain them, appease their hunger, or gain their favor. Psalm 50 directly confronts and dismantles this pagan worldview, which some Israelites may have inadvertently adopted, applying a transactional or utilitarian understanding to their relationship with Yahweh. Asaph, a prominent Levitical musician and prophet, frequently delivered God's messages through poetic and prophetic means, challenging superficial piety and calling for genuine covenant faithfulness. The declaration of God's universal ownership echoes foundational truths established from the earliest covenants, such as those found throughout the creation account in Genesis 1 and the covenant at Sinai in Exodus 19.
  • Key Themes: Psalm 50:12 powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within the psalm and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it emphatically declares God's Absolute Sovereignty and Ownership, asserting His complete dominion over all creation, echoing the profound truth found in Psalm 24:1, "The earth is the Lord's, and the fullness thereof". Secondly, it underscores Divine Self-Sufficiency (Aseity), proclaiming that God lacks nothing and is entirely independent of human offerings for His existence or well-being, a truth powerfully reiterated in the New Testament by Paul in Acts 17:25, "nor is he served by human hands, as though he needed anything, since he himself gives to all mankind life and breath and everything". Thirdly, it serves as a sharp Critique of Ritualism, rebuking the erroneous notion that sacrifices are a means to "feed" God or earn His favor through material provisions. Instead, it emphasizes that God desires a sincere heart, obedience, and thanksgiving more than mere burnt offerings, as profoundly stated in 1 Samuel 15:22, "To obey is better than sacrifice".

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • World (Hebrew, têbêl', H8398): This term, H8398, refers specifically to the inhabited earth, the productive land where humanity dwells. Its use here, rather than a more general term for "earth" (eretz), emphasizes God's ownership not just of the raw material of creation, but of the very sphere of human activity, sustenance, and civilization. It comprehensively includes all its resources, creatures, and the very life within it, underscoring the comprehensive nature of God's dominion over humanity's domain.
  • Fulness (Hebrew, mᵉlôʼ', H4393): This term, H4393, signifies "that which fills" or "all that is contained within." When paired with "world," it denotes the entirety of its contents – all its resources, wealth, creatures, and inhabitants. This comprehensive scope reinforces God's absolute and exhaustive ownership, leaving no aspect of creation outside His sovereign control. It implies that every atom, every creature, and every resource exists by His will, is sustained by His power, and ultimately exists for His glory.

Verse Breakdown

  • "If I were hungry, I would not tell thee:" This opening clause is a powerful rhetorical hypothetical statement designed to expose the inherent absurdity of the underlying human misconception about God's needs. It posits a condition (God being hungry) that is inherently impossible for the self-existent, all-sufficient, and omnipotent God. The second part of the clause, "I would not tell thee," emphasizes God's absolute independence and autonomy. Even if such an impossible scenario were to occur, God would never be reliant on humanity to meet His needs, nor would He communicate such a need to them. This highlights His complete freedom from dependence on His creation, underscoring His transcendence.
  • "for the world [is] mine, and the fulness thereof." This second clause provides the irrefutable theological basis and logical explanation for the first. It is a declarative statement of God's absolute, inherent, and comprehensive ownership of everything. The conjunction "for" (כִּי, ki) indicates cause or reason, explaining why God would never be hungry or need to communicate such a need to humanity. Because He owns the entire inhabited earth and all its contents – its resources, creatures, and inhabitants – He has no lack whatsoever. This declaration serves as a profound theological truth, correcting any anthropomorphic, pagan, or transactional notions of a needy deity.

Literary Devices

Psalm 50:12 masterfully employs several literary devices to convey its profound theological truth and challenge flawed human perceptions. The most prominent is Anthropomorphism, where human characteristics (hunger, needing to "tell" someone) are attributed to God. However, this is used ironically and hypothetically ("If I were hungry"), not literally, to highlight the impossibility of such a state for God. This rhetorical device serves to underscore God's utter transcendence and self-sufficiency by contrasting it with human limitations and needs. The verse also functions as a pivotal moment within the larger Divine Oracle or Courtroom Metaphor that frames Psalm 50, where God Himself is the judge, prosecutor, and witness, declaring His nature and expectations directly. The direct, authoritative statement "the world is mine, and the fulness thereof" is a declarative Assertion of Sovereignty, leaving no room for doubt about His ultimate authority and comprehensive ownership. The entire verse can also be seen as a form of Rhetorical Questioning or Implied Rebuke, as it implicitly challenges the flawed understanding of those who might view sacrifices as sustenance for God, thereby calling them to a deeper, more accurate understanding of His nature.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Psalm 50:12 stands as a cornerstone declaration of God's aseity – His self-existence and absolute independence from all creation. It fundamentally dismantles any transactional view of worship, where humanity attempts to "give" something to God that He supposedly lacks or needs. Instead, it reorients the worshipper to understand that all things originate from God and belong to Him, making all human offerings merely a return of what is already His, offered in humble gratitude, joyful obedience, and sincere devotion. This profound truth impacts our understanding of stewardship, humility, and the very nature of true worship, shifting the focus from ritual performance or material provision to heartfelt devotion and a recognition of God's boundless sufficiency and generosity.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Psalm 50:12 profoundly redefines our understanding of worship and our relationship with God. It liberates us from the burden of thinking we must "provide" for God, earn His favor, or impress Him through our material offerings or religious performances. Instead, it calls us to a worship rooted in humble gratitude and an awe-filled recognition of His boundless generosity and self-sufficiency. Our offerings, whether of time, talent, or treasure, are not contributions to a needy deity but rather expressions of thanksgiving and devotion, acknowledging that everything we have is a gift from His bounteous hand. This perspective fosters a spirit of radical generosity and faithful stewardship, reminding us that we are merely managers of His vast resources, called to use them for His glory and the good of His kingdom, trusting that the God who owns everything will surely provide for all our needs according to His riches in glory.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the truth of God's absolute ownership (that "the world is mine, and the fulness thereof") challenge any transactional or performance-based views you might hold about your relationship with Him?
  • If God does not "need" anything from us, what then is the true purpose and motivation behind our worship, service, and giving, and how can we cultivate a heart of genuine gratitude?
  • In what specific areas of your life (e.g., finances, time, talents, relationships) do you struggle to fully acknowledge God's ownership, and how might embracing this truth lead to greater freedom, peace, and faithfulness?

FAQ

Why did God command sacrifices in the Old Testament if He didn't need them for sustenance?

Answer: God commanded sacrifices not because He needed them for sustenance or physical provision, but for several crucial theological and pedagogical reasons that served His divine purposes. Firstly, sacrifices provided a divinely ordained means for atonement for sin, serving as a vivid object lesson pointing forward to the ultimate, perfect sacrifice of Christ (e.g., Leviticus 4). Secondly, they served as a tangible expression of worship, gratitude, and devotion from His people, allowing them to acknowledge God's sovereignty and provision (e.g., Leviticus 7:11-18). Thirdly, they were a constant reminder of the covenant relationship between God and Israel, emphasizing the holiness of God, the seriousness of sin, and the need for purity and reconciliation in His presence. Psalm 50:12 corrects the misunderstanding of sacrifices that had crept into Israelite worship, clarifying that their true value was in the sincere heart, obedience, and faith of the worshipper, not in literally providing for God's physical needs, which He, as the Creator and Owner of all, inherently does not have.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Psalm 50:12, with its profound declaration of God's self-sufficiency and universal ownership, finds its ultimate fulfillment and clearest expression in the person and work of Jesus Christ. As the Son, Christ perfectly embodies the Father's absolute independence and sovereignty. He is not a needy Messiah, but the One through whom "all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him" (Colossians 1:16). The Old Testament sacrificial system, which Psalm 50 critiques when performed with a wrong heart, pointed forward to Christ, who, as the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, offered Himself as the perfect, once-for-all sacrifice, not to satisfy a hungry or lacking God, but to atone for humanity's sin and fulfill God's righteous demands (Hebrews 10:10). In Christ, we see that God's desire is not for the blood of bulls and goats, but for a transformed heart and genuine worship "in spirit and truth" (John 4:24), a worship made possible by His own provision of salvation. He is the ultimate demonstration that God gives all and needs nothing, for in Him "all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell" (Colossians 1:19), making Him the inexhaustible source of life, truth, and grace.

Copy as

Commentary on Psalms 50 verses 7–15

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

God is here dealing with those that placed all their religion in the observances of the ceremonial law, and thought those sufficient.

I. He lays down the original contract between him and Israel, in which they had avouched him to be their God, and he them to be his people, and so both parties were agreed (Psa 50:7): Hear, O my people! and I will speak. Note, It is justly expected that whatever others doe, when he speaks, his people should give ear; who will, if they do not? And then we may comfortably expect that God will speak to us when we are ready to hear what he says; even when he testifies against us in the rebukes and threatenings of his word and providences we must be forward to hear what he says, to hear even the rod and him that has appointed it.

II. He puts a slight upon the legal sacrifices, Psa 50:8, etc. Now,

1.This may be considered as looking back to the use of these under the law. God had a controversy with the Jews; but what was the ground of the controversy? Not their neglect of the ceremonial institutions; no, they had not been wanting in the observance of them, their burnt-offerings had been continually before God, they took a pride in them, and hoped by their offerings to procure a dispensation for their lusts, as the adulterous woman, Pro 7:14. Their constant sacrifices, they thought, would both expiate and excuse their neglect of the weightier matters of the law. Nay, if they had, in some degree, neglected these institutions, yet that should not have been the cause of God's quarrel with them, for it was but a small offence in comparison with the immoralities of their conversation. They thought God was mightily beholden to them for the many sacrifices they had brought to his altar, and that they had made him very much their debtor by them, as if he could not h have maintained his numerous family of priests without their contributions; but God here shows them the contrary, (1.) That he did not need their sacrifices. What occasion had he for their bullocks and goats who has the command of all the beasts of the forest, and the cattle upon a thousand hills (Psa 50:9, Psa 50:10), has an incontestable propriety in them and dominion over them, has them all always under his eye and within his reach, and can make what use he pleases of them; they all wait on him, and are all at his disposal? Psa 104:27-29. Can we add any thing to his store whose all the wild fowl and wild beasts are, the world itself and the fulness thereof? Psa 50:11, Psa 50:12. God's infinite self-sufficiency proves our utter insufficiency to add any thing to him. (2.) That he could not be benefited by their sacrifices. Their goodness, of this kind, could not possibly extend to him, nor, if they were in this matter righteous, was he the better (Psa 50:13): Will I eat the flesh of bulls? It is as absurd to think that their sacrifices could, of themselves, and by virtue of any innate excellency in them, add any pleasure of praise to God, as it would be to imagine that an infinite Spirit could be supported by meat and drink, as our bodies are. It is said indeed of the demons whom the Gentiles worshipped that they did eat the fat of their sacrifices, and drink the wine of their drink-offerings (Deu 32:38): they regaled themselves in the homage they robbed the true God of; but will the great Jehovah be thus entertained? No; to obey is better than sacrifice, and to love God and our neighbour better than all burnt-offerings, so much better that God by his prophets often told them that their sacrifices were not only not acceptable, but abominable, to him, while they lived in sin; instead of pleasing him, he looked upon them as a mockery, and therefore an affront and provocation to him; see Pro 15:8; Isa 1:11, etc.; Isa 66:3; Jer 6:20; Amo 5:21. They are therefore here warned not to rest in these performances; but to conduct themselves, in all other instances, towards God as their God.

2.This may be considered as looking forward to the abolishing of these by the gospel of Christ. Thus Dr. Hammond understands it. When God shall set up the kingdom of the Messiah he shall abolish the old way of worship by sacrifice and offerings; he will no more have those to be continually before him (Psa 50:8); he will no more require of his worshippers to bring him their bullocks and their goats, to be burnt upon his altar, Psa 50:9. For indeed he never appointed this as that which he had any need of, or took any pleasure in, for, besides that all we have is his already, he has far more beasts in the forest and upon the mountains, which we know nothing of nor have any property in, than we have in our folds; but he instituted it to prefigure the great sacrifice which his own Son should in the fulness of time offer upon the cross, to make atonement for sin, and all the other spiritual sacrifices of acknowledgment with which God, through Christ, will be well pleased.

III. He directs to the best sacrifices of prayer and praise as those which, under the law, were preferred before all burnt-offerings and sacrifices, and on which then the greatest stress was laid, and which now, under the gospel, come in the room of those carnal ordinances which were imposed until the times of reformation. He shows us here (Psa 50:14, Psa 50:15) what is good, and what the Lord our God requires of us, and will accept, when sacrifices are slighted and superseded. 1. We must make a penitent acknowledgment of our sins: Offer to God confession, so some read it, and understand it of the confession of sin, in order to our giving glory to God and taking shame to ourselves, that we may never return to it. A broken and contrite heart is the sacrifice which God will not despise, Psa 51:17. If the sin was not abandoned the sin-offering was not accepted. 2. We must give God thanks for his mercies to us: Offer to God thanksgiving, every day, often every day (seven times a day will I praise thee), and upon special occasions; and this shall please the Lord, if it come from a humble thankful heart, full of love to him and joy in him, better than an ox or bullock that has horns and hoofs, Psa 69:30, Psa 69:31. 3. We must make conscience of performing our covenants with him: Pay thy vows to the Most High, forsake thy sins, and do thy duty better, pursuant to the solemn promises thou has made him to that purport. When we give God thanks for any mercy we have received we must be sure to pay the vows we made to him when we were in the pursuit of the mercy, else our thanksgivings will not be accepted. Dr. Hammond applies this to the great gospel ordinance of the eucharist, in which we are to give thanks to God for his great love in sending his Son to save us, and to pay our vows of love and duty to him, and to give alms. Instead of all the Old Testament types of a Christ to come, we have that blessed memorial of a Christ already come. 4. In the day of distress we must address ourselves to God by faithful and fervent prayer (Psa 50:15): Call upon me in the day of trouble, and not upon any other god. Our troubles, though we see them coming from God's hand, must drive us to him, and not drive us from him. We must thus acknowledge him in all our ways, depend upon his wisdom, power, and goodness, and refer ourselves entirely to him, and so give him glory. This is a cheaper, easier, readier way of seeking his favour than by a peace-offering, and yet more acceptable. 5. When he, in answer to our prayers, delivers us, as he has promised to do in such way and time as he shall think fit, we must glorify him, not only by a grateful mention of his favour, but by living to his praise. Thus must we keep up our communion with God, meeting him with our prayers when he afflicts us and with our praises when he delivers us.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 7–15. Public domain.
Copy as
TertullianAD 220
AGAINST MARCION 2.22
Although he had respect to the offerings of Abel and smelled a sweet savor from the whole burnt offering of Noah, yet what pleasure could he receive from the flesh of sheep or the odor of burning victims? And yet the simple and God-fearing mind of those who offered what they were receiving from God, both in the way of food and of a sweet smell, was favorably accepted before God, in the sense of respectful homage to God, who did not so much want what was offered as that which prompted the offering.
John ChrysostomAD 407
COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 50:4
Though I am Lord and Master of everything, I am ready to accept from you what is mine so as to win you over to love of me.
Augustine of HippoAD 430
Exposition on Psalm 50
Who can explain, who expound that which is said to Him in another Psalm, "For my goods You need not"? He has said that He needs not from us any necessary thing. "If I shall be hungry, I will not tell you" [Psalm 50:12]. He that keeps Israel shall neither hunger nor thirst, nor be weary, nor fall asleep. But, lo! According to your carnality I speak: because you will suffer hunger when you have not eaten, perhaps you think even God does hunger that He may eat. Even though He shall be hungry, He tells not you: all things are before Him, whence He will He takes what is needful for Him. These words are said to convince little understanding; not that God has declared His hunger. Though for our sake this God of gods deigned even to hunger. He came to hunger, and to fill; He came to thirst, and give drink; He came to be clothed with mortality, and to clothe with immortality; He came poor, to make rich. For He lost not His riches by taking to Him our poverty, for, "In him are all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge hidden." [Colossians 2:3] "If I shall be hungry, I will not tell you. For Mine is the whole world, and the fullness thereof." Do not then labour to find what to give Me, without whom I have what I will.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Psalms 50:12 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.