Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And one kid of the goats for a sin offering; beside the continual burnt offering, his meat offering, and his drink offering.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And one H259 kid H8163 of the goats H5795 for a sin offering H2403; beside the continual H8548 burnt offering H5930, his meat offering H4503, and his drink offering H5262.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
also one male goat as a sin offering; in addition to the regular burnt offering with its grain and drink offerings.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Include one male goat as a sin offering, in addition to the regular burnt offering with its grain offering and drink offering.
Ask
American Standard Version
and one he-goat for a sin-offering; besides the continual burnt-offering, the meal-offering thereof, and the drink-offering thereof.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
and one male goat for a sin offering; besides the continual burnt offering, its meal offering, and its drink offering.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And an hee goate for a sinne offering beside the continuall burnt offring, his meate offering and his drinke offering.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and one kid of the goats, a sin-offering, apart from the continual burnt-offering, its present, and its libation.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Numbers 29:25 meticulously details a specific sacrificial requirement for the seventh day of the Feast of Tabernacles: the presentation of "one kid of the goats for a sin offering," which was to be offered in addition to the foundational continual burnt offering and its associated grain and drink offerings. This instruction underscores the pervasive need for atonement and purification within Israel's worship, even amidst the joyous celebration of God's provision and faithfulness during one of their most significant annual festivals.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Numbers 29 is a highly prescriptive chapter, meticulously outlining the specific sacrifices required for Israel's annual festivals, building upon the general principles of daily and monthly offerings established in Numbers 28. This particular verse is embedded within the detailed instructions for the Feast of Tabernacles (Sukkot), a seven-day celebration culminating in an eighth concluding day. Each day of this festival prescribed a unique, progressively decreasing number of bull offerings, but consistently included a sin offering and the regular daily sacrifices. Verse 25 specifically addresses the requirements for the seventh day, emphasizing that even on the penultimate day of this grand celebration, the need for purification through a sin offering remained paramount, in addition to the foundational continual burnt offering and its accompanying oblations. The repetitive, formulaic nature of these instructions throughout the chapter highlights the divine precision and the non-negotiable character of Israel's worship.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The Feast of Tabernacles, or Sukkot, was one of the three major pilgrimage festivals in ancient Israel, commanded by God in Leviticus 23:33-43. It was primarily a joyous harvest festival, celebrating God's abundant provision and protection, while also commemorating the forty years of wilderness wandering when Israel lived in temporary shelters (tabernacles or booths). During this festival, Israelites were commanded to live in booths as a tangible reminder of their transient journey and God's unwavering faithfulness. The inclusion of numerous sacrifices, especially sin offerings, even during such a celebratory time, highlights the pervasive understanding of human sinfulness and the constant need for divine cleansing to maintain a holy relationship with God and remain pure in His presence. The "kid of the goats" was a common and prescribed animal for sin offerings, often signifying a humble but effective means of atonement for unintentional sins or ritual impurities that could defile the community or the sanctuary.
  • Key Themes: The detailed sacrificial instructions in Numbers 29 contribute significantly to several overarching themes within the book of Numbers and the Pentateuch. Firstly, the Ongoing Need for Atonement is vividly portrayed; the daily inclusion of a sin offering, even during a joyous festival, underscores the persistent reality of human sin and the perpetual need for God's provision for cleansing and reconciliation. This reiterates the principle that sin, even unintentional, creates a barrier between humanity and a holy God. Secondly, God's Meticulous Instructions are profoundly evident in the precise and extensive nature of the sacrificial laws, highlighting His demand for order, holiness, and exact obedience in worship, reflecting His own holy character. This meticulousness ensures that Israel understood the seriousness of approaching a holy God and the gravity of their covenant obligations. Finally, the theme of Communal Purity is crucial; these offerings were not just for individual purification but for the entire community, emphasizing their corporate responsibility and their collective dependence on God's grace to remain in covenant relationship, echoing the principles found in Leviticus 4 regarding communal sin offerings.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • sin offering (Hebrew, chaṭṭâʼâh', H2403): From the root meaning "to miss the mark," chaṭṭâʼâh refers to an offense, its penalty, or the sacrifice made for expiation. In the context of Numbers 29:25, it denotes a specific type of sacrifice designed to atone for unintentional sins, errors, or ritual uncleanness that might inadvertently defile the tabernacle or hinder one's fellowship with God. It was crucial for restoring purity and making atonement for the community's collective or individual failings that broke ritual purity or God's law unknowingly.
  • kid (Hebrew, sâʻîyr', H8163): Meaning "shaggy" and, as a noun, "a he-goat," this term refers to a young male goat. The selection of a goat for the sin offering, as opposed to a more valuable bull or ram, was a prescribed animal for certain sin offerings, particularly for the community or for a ruler as seen in Leviticus 4:23. Its sacrifice served as a symbolic transfer of impurity, allowing for purification and restoration of fellowship with God.
  • continual (Hebrew, tâmîyd', H8548): From an unused root meaning "to stretch," tâmîyd properly signifies continuance or indefinite extension. Attributively, it means constant or perpetually, and elliptically, it refers to the regular (daily) sacrifice. In this verse, "beside the continual burnt offering" emphasizes that the festival-specific sacrifices were in addition to, not a replacement for, the daily morning and evening burnt offerings (as detailed in Numbers 28:3-8), which symbolized the perpetual need for general atonement and devotion to God.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And one kid of the goats [for] a sin offering": This clause precisely specifies the animal and its primary purpose. The "kid of the goats" was the prescribed animal for the ḥaṭṭâʼt (sin offering) in this context, indicating a sacrifice intended to purify the community from ritual defilement or unintentional transgressions. Its inclusion daily during Sukkot highlights the constant need for purification, ensuring Israel's continued acceptability before a holy God even during a time of celebration.
  • "beside the continual burnt offering": This crucial phrase indicates that the sin offering for the seventh day of the festival was an additional sacrifice. It did not replace the daily, foundational burnt offering, which symbolized general atonement, devotion, and the complete surrender of the worshiper to God. This layering of sacrifices underscored the multifaceted nature of Israel's relationship with God—daily devotion, general atonement, and specific purification for sin and uncleanness.
  • "his meat offering, and his drink offering": These refer to the grain (or meal) offering (minḥah) and drink offering (nesek) that invariably accompanied the burnt offering. The grain offering typically consisted of flour, oil, and frankincense, symbolizing dedication and thanksgiving, while the drink offering (usually wine) was poured out as a libation, signifying devotion and commitment. Their inclusion here confirms that the full daily sacrificial regimen was maintained, with the sin offering added on top for the festival's specific requirements.

Literary Devices

The verse, as part of a larger liturgical section, primarily employs Enumeration and Legalistic Language. The precise listing of animals and their purposes ("one kid of the goats for a sin offering") is characteristic of the priestly codes, emphasizing divine command and the meticulous nature of required worship. This detailed Enumeration ensures no ambiguity in the performance of sacred duties and highlights the divine demand for order and precision in approaching God. Furthermore, the entire chapter, including this verse, functions as a form of Prescriptive Law, laying down specific instructions for ritual performance. The very structure of the text, with its repetitive formulas for each day's offerings, creates a sense of solemnity and divine authority, reinforcing the idea that these are not suggestions but non-negotiable requirements for maintaining covenant fidelity. The offerings themselves, particularly the sin offering, also carry deep Symbolism, representing the transfer of sin or impurity and the subsequent restoration of purity through the shedding of blood, pointing forward to a greater, ultimate sacrifice.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Numbers 29:25, with its specific mention of a sin offering, powerfully illustrates the pervasive reality of human sin and the constant need for divine provision for atonement within the Old Covenant. Even during the joyous Feast of Tabernacles, a time of thanksgiving and remembrance of God's faithfulness, the daily inclusion of a sin offering underscored that human imperfection and ritual impurity were ever-present, necessitating continuous cleansing to maintain fellowship with a holy God. This constant cycle of sacrifice for sin highlighted the temporary and insufficient nature of the Old Testament system, which could only cover sins ceremonially and repeatedly, never truly taking them away or perfecting the conscience. It served as a perpetual reminder of the gravity of sin and the unbridgeable gap between a sinful humanity and a holy God, a gap that required a perfect, once-for-all sacrifice.

  • Leviticus 17:11: "For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul."
  • Hebrews 9:22: "And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission."
  • Romans 3:23-24: "For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus."

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Numbers 29:25, though rooted in ancient Israelite ritual, speaks profoundly to the enduring human condition and God's gracious response. The daily sin offering during a festival of joy reminds us that even in our moments of greatest celebration or spiritual fervor, our fallen nature persists, and we remain utterly dependent on God's grace for purification. For believers today, this verse serves as a powerful backdrop against which to appreciate the singular, complete, and eternal sacrifice of Jesus Christ. We are not called to offer daily animal sacrifices, but we are continually reminded of our inherent need for God's mercy and the absolute sufficiency of Christ's finished work. This understanding should cultivate within us a spirit of profound humility, deep gratitude, and ongoing repentance, recognizing that our access to God is solely through the atoning blood of Jesus. It calls us to live lives of holiness, acknowledging that our purity is a gift, not an earned status, and to walk in a manner worthy of the grace we have received, striving for purity not out of obligation to ritual, but out of love for the One who cleansed us once for all.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the persistent need for a sin offering, even during a joyful feast, challenge my understanding of human sinfulness and God's holiness?
  • In what ways do I still rely on God's grace for cleansing and forgiveness in my daily life, even after receiving Christ?
  • How does the "continual burnt offering" alongside the "sin offering" inform my understanding of daily devotion versus specific acts of repentance?
  • What does the fulfillment of these Old Testament sacrifices in Christ mean for my approach to worship and personal holiness today?

FAQ

What was the Feast of Tabernacles, and why were so many sacrifices required?

Answer: The Feast of Tabernacles (Sukkot) was one of the three major annual pilgrimage festivals for ancient Israel, celebrated for seven days, followed by an eighth concluding day. It served multiple purposes: it was a harvest festival, giving thanks for God's provision; it commemorated God's faithfulness in sustaining Israel during their forty years of wilderness wandering, when they lived in temporary shelters or "tabernacles" (Leviticus 23:42-43); and it looked forward to the ingathering of all nations. The numerous and varied sacrifices, including the specific "kid of the goats for a sin offering" mentioned in Numbers 29:25, were required to ensure the community's ritual purity and atonement before a holy God, even during a time of joyous celebration. They underscored the constant presence of sin and the need for God's ongoing provision for reconciliation and fellowship.

How does a 'sin offering' (ḥaṭṭāʼt) differ from other Old Testament offerings?

Answer: The ḥaṭṭāʼt or sin offering, as seen in Numbers 29:25, was distinct from other offerings like the burnt offering (ʻōlâh), grain offering (minḥâh), or peace offering (shelamim). While the burnt offering symbolized complete dedication and general atonement, and peace offerings fostered fellowship, the sin offering specifically addressed unintentional sins, errors, or ritual impurities that defiled the individual or the sanctuary. It was not primarily for intentional, high-handed sins. Its purpose was to purify, cleanse, and restore the individual or community to a state of ritual purity, allowing them to remain in fellowship with God and participate in sacred worship without defiling His holy presence. The blood of the animal was crucial in this process, as it was understood to make atonement for the soul (Leviticus 17:11).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The daily "kid of the goats for a sin offering" in Numbers 29:25, repeated throughout the Feast of Tabernacles and indeed throughout the liturgical year, vividly portrays the temporary and incomplete nature of the Old Covenant sacrificial system. Each offering, though divinely commanded, could only ceremonially cover sin, never truly taking it away or perfecting the conscience of the worshiper (Hebrews 10:1-4). This constant cycle of sacrifice served as a perpetual pointer to the ultimate need for a perfect, once-for-all sacrifice. This need was gloriously fulfilled in Jesus Christ, the true Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. Unlike the goats and bulls whose blood merely cleansed outwardly, Christ, "through the eternal Spirit, offered himself without blemish to God," cleansing our consciences from dead works to serve the living God (Hebrews 9:14). His single, perfect sacrifice on the cross accomplished what countless Old Testament offerings could not: it provided full, complete, and eternal atonement for all sin, making those who believe perfectly righteous before God (2 Corinthians 5:21). Thus, Numbers 29:25, with its emphasis on a continually needed sin offering, deepens our appreciation for the finality and sufficiency of Christ's work, allowing us to approach God with confidence, not based on repeated rituals, but on the finished work of our great High Priest (Hebrews 4:16).

Copy as

Commentary on Numbers 29 verses 12–40

Soon after the day of atonement, that day in which men were to afflict their souls, followed the feast of tabernacles, in which they were to rejoice before the Lord; for those that sow in tears shall soon reap in joy. To the former laws about this feast, which we had, Lev 23:34, etc., here are added directions about the offerings by fire, which they were to offer unto the Lord during the seven days of that feast, Lev 23:36. Observe here, 1. Their days of rejoicing were to be days of sacrifices. A disposition to be cheerful does us no harm, nor is any bad symptom, when it is so far from unfitting us for the duties of God's immediate service that it encourages and enlarges our hearts in them. 2. All the days of their dwelling in booths they must offer sacrifices. While we are here in a tabernacle-state, it is our interest as well as duty constantly to keep up communion with God; nor will the unsettledness of our outward condition excuse us in our neglect of the duties of God's worship. 3. The sacrifices for each of the seven days, though differing in nothing but the number of the bullocks, are severally and particularly appointed, which yet is no vain repetition; for God would thus teach them to be very exact in those observances, and to keep an eye of faith fixed upon the institution in every day's work. It likewise intimates that the repetition of the same services, if performed with an upright heart, and with a continued fire of pious and devout affection, is no weariness to God, and therefore we ought not to snuff at it, or to say, Behold, what a weariness it is to us! 4. The number of bullocks (which were the most costly part of the sacrifice) decreased every day. On the first day of the feast they were to offer thirteen, on the second day but twelve, on the third day eleven, etc. So that on the seventh they offered seven; and the last day, though it was the great day of the feast, and celebrated with a holy convocation, yet they were to offer but one bullock; and, whereas on all the other days they offered two rams and fourteen lambs, on this they offered but one ram and seven lambs. Such was the will of the Law-maker, and that is reason enough for the law. Some suggest that God herein considered the infirmity of the flesh, which is apt to grudge the charge and expense of religion; it is therefore ordered to grow less and less, that they might not complain as if God had made them to serve with an offering, Isa 43:23. Or it is hereby intimated to them that the legal dispensation should wax old, and vanish away at last; and the multitude of their sacrifices should end in one great sacrifice, infinitely more worthy than all of them. It was on the last day of the feast, after all these sacrifices had been ordered, that our Lord Jesus stood and cried to those who still thirsted after righteousness (being sensible of the insufficiency of these sacrifices to justify them) to come unto him and drink, Joh 7:37. 5. The meat-offerings and drink-offerings attended all the sacrifices, according to their number, after the manner. Be there ever so much flesh, it is no feast without bread and drink, therefore these must never be omitted at God's altar, which was his table. We must not think that doing much in religion will be accepted if we do not do it well, and after the manner that God has appointed. 6. Every day there must be a sin-offering presented, as we observed in the other feasts. Our burnt-offerings of praise cannot be accepted of God unless we have an interest in the great sacrifice of propitiation which Christ offered when for us he made himself a sin-offering. 7. Even when all these sacrifices were offered, yet the continual burnt-offering must not be omitted either morning or evening, but each day this must be offered first in the morning and last in the evening. No extraordinary services should jostle out our stated devotions. 8. Though all these sacrifices were required to be presented by the body of the congregation, at the common charge, yet, besides these, particular persons were to glorify God with their vows and their free-will offerings, Num 29:39. When God commanded that this they must do, he left room for the generosity of their devotion, a great deal more they might do, not inventing other worships, but abounding in these, as Ch2 30:23, Ch2 30:24. Large directions had been given in Leviticus concerning the offerings of all sorts that should be brought by particular persons according to the providences of God concerning them and the graces of God in them. Though every Israelite had an interest in these common sacrifices, yet he must not think that these will serve instead of his vows and his free-will offerings. Thus our ministers' praying with us and for us will not excuse us from praying for ourselves.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 12–40. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Numbers 29:25 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.