See on the biblical-era map

Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Nehemiah 13:23–31. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
We have here one instance more of Nehemiah's pious zeal for the purifying of his countrymen as a peculiar people to God; that was the thing he aimed at in the use of his power, not the enriching of himself. See here,
I.How they had corrupted themselves by marrying strange wives.
This was complained of in Ezra's time, and much done towards a reformation, Ezr 9:1-15 and 10. But, when the unclean spirit is cast out, if a watchful eye be not kept upon him, he will re-enter; so he did here. Though in Ezra's time those that had married strange wives were forced to put them away, which could not but occasion trouble and confusion in families, yet others would not take warning. Nitimur in vetitum - we still lean towards what is forbidden. Nehemiah, like a good governor, enquired into the state of the families of those that were under his charge, that he might reform what was amiss in them, and so heal the streams by healing the springs.
1.He enquired whence they had their wives, and found that many of the Jews had married wives of Ashdod, of Ammon, and of Moab (Neh 13:23), either because they were fond of what was far-fetched or because they hoped by these alliances to strengthen and enrich themselves. See how God by the prophet reproves this, Mal 2:11. Judah has dealt treacherously, and broken covenant with God, the covenant made in Ezra's time with reference to this very thing; he has profaned the holiness of the Lord by marrying the daughter (that is, the worshipper) of a strange god.
2.He talked with the children, and found they were children of strangers, for their speech betrayed them. The children were bred up with their mothers, and learned of them and their nurses and servants to speak, so that they could not speak the Jews' language, could not speak it at all, or not readily, or not purely, but half in the speech of Ashdod, or Ammon, or Moab, according as the country was which the mother was a native of. Observe,
(1.)Children, in their childhood, learn much of their mothers. Partus sequitur ventrem - they are prone to imitate their mothers.
(2.)If either side be bad, the corrupt nature will incline the children to take after that, which is a good reason why Christians should not be unequally yoked.
(3.)In the education of children great care should be taken about the government of their tongues, that they learn not the language of Ashdod, any impious or impure talk, any corrupt communication.
II.What course Nehemiah took to purge out this corruption, when he discovered how much it had prevailed.
1.He showed them the evil of it, and the obligation he lay under to witness against it. He did not seek an occasion against them, but this was an iniquity to be punished by the judge, and which he must by no means connive at (Neh 13:27): "Shall we hearken to you, who endeavour to palliate and excuse it? No, it is an evil, a great evil, it is a transgression against our God, to marry strange wives, and we must do our utmost to put a stop to it. You beg that they may not be divorced from you, but we cannot hearken to you, for there is no other remedy to clear us from the guilt and prevent infection." (1.) He quotes a precept, to prove that it was in itself a great sin; and makes them swear to that precept: You shall not give your daughters unto their sons, etc., which is taken from Deu 7:3. When we would reclaim people from sin we must show them the sinfulness of it in the glass of the commandment. (2.) He quotes a precedent, to show the pernicious consequences of it, which made it necessary to be animadverted upon by the government (Neh 13:26): Did not Solomon king of Israel sin by these things? The falls of great and good men are recorded in order that we may take warning by them to shun the temptations which they were overcome by. Solomon was famous for wisdom; there was no king like him for it; yet, when he married strange wives, his wisdom could not secure him from their snares, nay, it departed from him, and he did very foolishly. He was beloved of God, but his marrying strange wives threw him out of God's favour, and went near to extinguish the holy fire of grace in his soul: he was king over all Israel; but his doing this occasioned the loss of ten of his twelve tribes. You plead that you can marry strange wives and yet retain the purity of Israelites; but Solomon himself could not; even him did outlandish women cause to sin. Therefore let him that thinks he stands take heed lest he fall when he runs upon such a precipice.
2.He showed himself highly displeased at it, that he might awaken them to a due sense of the evil of it: He contended with them, Neh 13:25. They offered to justify themselves in what they did, but he showed them how frivolous their excuses were, and argued it warmly with them. When he had silenced them he cursed them, that is, he denounced the judgments of God against them, and showed them what their sin deserved. He then picked out some of them that were more obstinate than the rest, and fit to be made examples, and smote them (that is, ordered them to be beaten by the proper officers according to the law, Deu 25:2, Deu 25:3), to which he added this further mark of infamy that he plucked off their hair, or cut or shaved it off; for it may so be understood. Perhaps they had prided themselves in their hair, and therefore he took it off to deform and humble them, and put them to shame; it was, in effect, to stigmatize them, at least for a time. Ezra, in this case, had plucked off his own hair, in holy sorrow for the sin; Nehemiah plucked off their hair, in a holy indignation at the sinners. See the different tempers of wise, and good, and useful men, and the divers graces, as well as divers gifts, of the same Spirit.
3.He obliged them not to take any more such wives, and separated those whom they had taken: He cleansed them from all strangers, both men and women (Neh 13:30), and made them promise with an oath that they would never do so again, Neh 13:25. Thus did he try all ways and means to put a stop to this mischief and to prevent another relapse into this disease.
4.He took particular care of the priests' families, that they might not lie under this stain, this guilt. He found, upon enquiry, that a branch of the high priest's own family, one of his grandsons, had married a daughter of Sanballat, that notorious enemy of the Jews (Neh 2:10; Neh 4:1), and so had, in effect, twisted interests with the Samaritans, Neh 13:28. How little love had that man either to God or his country who could make himself in duty and interest a friend to him that was a sworn enemy to both. It seems this young priest would not put away his wife, and therefore Nehemiah chased him from him, deprived him, degraded him, and made him for ever incapable of the priesthood. Josephus says that this expelled priest was Manasseh, and that when Nehemiah drove him away he went to his father-in-law Sanballat, who built him a temple upon Mount Gerazim, like that at Jerusalem, and promised him he should be high priest in it, and that then was laid the foundation of the Samaritans' pretensions, which continued warm to our Saviour's time. Joh 4:20, Our fathers worshipped in this mountain. When Nehemiah had thus expelled one that had forfeited the honour of the priesthood he again posted the priests and Levites every one in his business, Neh 13:30. It was no loss to them to part with one that was the scandal of their cloth; the work would be done better without him. When Judas had gone out Christ said, Now is the Son of Man glorified, Joh 13:30, Joh 13:31. Here are Nehemiah's prayers on this occasion. (1.) He prays, Remember them, O my God! Neh 13:29. "Lord, convince and convert them; put them in mind of what they should be and do, that they may come to themselves." Or, "Remember them to reckon with them for their sin; remember it against them." If we take it so, this prayer is a prophecy that God would remember it against them. Those that defile the priesthood despise God, and shall be lightly esteemed. Perhaps they were too many and too great for him to deal with. "Lord" (says he), "deal thou with them; take the work into thy own hands." (2.) He prays, Remember me, O my God! Neh 13:31. The best services done to the public have sometimes been forgotten by those for whom they were done (Ecc 9:15); therefore Nehemiah refers it to God to recompense him, takes him for his paymaster, and then doubts not but he shall be well paid. This may well be the summary of our petitions; we need no more to make us happy than this: Remember me, O my God! for good.
Continue studying Nehemiah 13:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Nehemiah 13:26 delivers a piercing rhetorical question from Nehemiah to the leaders of Judah, serving as a profound and urgent warning against spiritual compromise, particularly through forbidden intermarriage. He invokes the monumental and tragic example of King Solomon, Israel's wisest and most favored monarch, whose unparalleled wisdom and divine blessing did not prevent him from being led astray by "outlandish women" into idolatry. This verse powerfully underscores the insidious danger of ungodly influences, the persistent vulnerability of even the most blessed, and the critical importance of unwavering fidelity to God's covenant.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is strategically placed within Nehemiah's second return to Jerusalem, likely around 430 BC, as detailed in Nehemiah 13. Upon his arrival, Nehemiah discovers widespread spiritual backsliding among the returned exiles, including the desecration of the Sabbath, neglect of tithes for the Levites, and, most critically, rampant intermarriage with foreign women from surrounding pagan nations like Ashdod, Ammon, and Moab. Nehemiah's response is one of righteous indignation, directly confronting the nobles and officials who had permitted these severe covenant violations. The reference to Solomon in Nehemiah 13:23-27 forms the climax of his impassioned argument, reminding them of the severe consequences of past disobedience and challenging their complacency by invoking the most prominent example of a king who fell due to this very sin.
Historical & Cultural Context
The post-exilic community, under the spiritual leadership of Ezra and Nehemiah, was acutely aware that the Babylonian exile had been a direct consequence of Israel's covenant unfaithfulness, particularly their idolatry and failure to obey God's laws. The Mosaic Law, specifically in passages like Deuteronomy 7:3-4, explicitly forbade intermarriage with the surrounding pagan nations. This prohibition was not merely for ethnic purity but, more importantly, to prevent spiritual corruption and the introduction of idolatry into Israel. Foreign women often brought their gods and customs, leading the Israelites to worship other deities, as tragically exemplified by Solomon. Nehemiah's generation was tasked with rebuilding not just the physical walls of Jerusalem but also the spiritual integrity of the nation, making strict adherence to these commands paramount to avoid repeating the catastrophic sins of their ancestors.
Key Themes
Nehemiah 13:26 powerfully encapsulates several critical themes pertinent to the post-exilic community and beyond. Firstly, it highlights the Danger of Spiritual Compromise, demonstrating how seemingly personal choices like marriage can have profound, nation-altering spiritual consequences, leading to idolatry and a departure from God's covenant. Secondly, it underscores that Even the Greatest Can Fall, using Solomon—renowned for his unparalleled wisdom and wealth and explicitly called "beloved of his God"—as a sobering example that no one, regardless of divine favor or personal gifting, is immune to temptation or the corrosive effects of disobedience. Thirdly, the verse emphasizes the Consequences of Disobedience, reminding the audience that Solomon's foreign wives led him to build altars for their gods, ultimately turning his heart away from the Lord and leading to the division of his kingdom after his death, as detailed in 1 Kings 11:4-13. Lastly, it points to the Insidious Power of Ungodly Influence, as the "outlandish women" actively "caused" Solomon to sin, illustrating how ungodly relationships can subtly but surely erode one's faith and obedience to God.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This term (נָכְרִיּוֹת, from H5237) refers to women who are "foreign," "strange," or "alien." In the biblical context, especially concerning covenant people, "foreign" carried a profound spiritual connotation. It was not merely about nationality or ethnicity but, more significantly, about their alien religion, customs, and lack of covenant relationship with Yahweh. These women were not part of the covenant community and, by extension, brought their pagan practices and gods into the heart of Israelite worship, directly violating the exclusivity of Israel's relationship with God.
The phrase "beloved of his God" (אָהֵב אֱלֹהָיו, from H157) highlights Solomon's unique status and divine favor. Indeed, his very name, Jedidiah (יְדִידְיָהּ), given by Nathan the prophet, means "beloved of the Lord" (2 Samuel 12:25). This designation underscores the depth of God's initial blessing and intimate relationship with Solomon. The irony, therefore, is profound: the one so uniquely favored by God, endowed with unparalleled wisdom, was still susceptible to sin, emphasizing the pervasive danger of disobedience and the power of corrupting influences.
Verse Breakdown
"Did not Solomon king of Israel sin by these things?"
This is a powerful rhetorical question posed by Nehemiah. It assumes an obvious "yes" answer, drawing on the well-known history of Solomon's fall. "These things" refers directly to the intermarriage with foreign women and the subsequent idolatry that Nehemiah is confronting in his own generation. The question serves as an undeniable indictment and a warning that if such a great king could fall, how much more vulnerable are the current leaders and people.
"yet among many nations was there no king like him, who was beloved of his God, and God made him king over all Israel:"
This clause magnifies the tragedy of Solomon's fall by highlighting his extraordinary status. He was unparalleled among kings, not just in wealth and wisdom, but crucially, in his unique relationship with God. He was "beloved of his God," indicating divine favor and intimate knowledge, and God Himself established his reign over all Israel. This emphasis on Solomon's divine blessing and unparalleled position makes his subsequent sin even more shocking and serves to intensify the warning Nehemiah delivers.
"nevertheless even him did outlandish women cause to sin."
This is the stark, concluding statement that delivers the punch of Nehemiah's argument. Despite all his advantages—wisdom, wealth, divine favor, and a kingdom established by God—Solomon was led astray. The phrase "cause to sin" (הֶחֱטִיאוּ, from H2398) implies active enticement and corruption, directly attributing his downfall to the influence of his foreign wives who turned his heart to their gods (1 Kings 11:4). This serves as a direct and urgent warning to Nehemiah's contemporaries about the very real and devastating consequences of spiritual compromise through forbidden alliances.
Literary Devices
Nehemiah 13:26 masterfully employs several literary devices to convey its urgent message and underscore the gravity of spiritual compromise. The primary device is a Rhetorical Question, "Did not Solomon king of Israel sin by these things?" This is not a question seeking information but a forceful assertion designed to elicit immediate agreement and underscore the undeniable truth of Solomon's well-known transgression. It functions as a powerful form of Argument by Analogy or Exemplum, using a prominent historical figure as a cautionary tale. Solomon, the epitome of Israelite kingship, wisdom, and divine favor, serves as the ultimate example of the devastating consequences of spiritual compromise. There is also a profound Irony at play: the wisest king, "beloved of his God," was ultimately led into folly and sin by those he chose to associate with. This ironic twist highlights the insidious nature of temptation and the vulnerability of even the most divinely favored. Finally, the verse functions as a direct Warning, a prophetic utterance designed to shock the complacent leaders into immediate action and prevent their generation from repeating the catastrophic errors of the past.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Nehemiah 13:26 stands as a powerful testament to the enduring biblical themes of covenant fidelity, the insidious nature of sin, and the profound consequences of spiritual compromise. It underscores that even those most blessed and seemingly secure in their relationship with God are not immune to temptation, particularly when they disregard divine commands regarding purity and separation. Solomon's fall serves as a perpetual reminder that wisdom and divine favor do not negate the need for vigilance and obedience. The verse emphasizes that true devotion to God demands exclusivity and that allowing foreign influences, especially those that introduce idolatry, will inevitably lead to a departure from the covenant and its blessings. It highlights the principle that our relationships profoundly shape our spiritual trajectory, underscoring the critical importance of choosing associations that reinforce, rather than erode, our commitment to God.
Reflection and Application
Nehemiah's stern warning to ancient Israel resonates powerfully in the lives of believers today. The story of Solomon's fall serves as a timeless cautionary tale, urging us to recognize that spiritual compromise, often subtle and seemingly innocuous, can have devastating consequences. Just as "outlandish women" led Solomon astray, so too can "outlandish influences"—whether ungodly relationships, worldly philosophies, cultural trends, or even seemingly harmless entertainments—subtly but surely draw our hearts away from singular devotion to God. This verse challenges us to critically examine our closest associations and the influences we permit into our lives, especially in significant relationships like marriage, business partnerships, or deep friendships. It calls for a proactive guarding of our hearts and minds, prioritizing spiritual purity and unwavering obedience to God's Word above all else, remembering that even great wisdom and blessing do not exempt us from the need for constant vigilance and unwavering commitment to Christ.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was intermarriage such a significant sin in the Old Testament?
Intermarriage was forbidden primarily for spiritual reasons, not ethnic ones. The surrounding nations worshipped idols and practiced customs contrary to God's law. Marrying into these families meant bringing their gods and practices into the Israelite home, directly violating the First Commandment against having other gods before Yahweh (Exodus 20:3). As seen with Solomon, these unions inevitably led to syncretism and idolatry, corrupting the covenant community and provoking God's wrath, ultimately leading to national judgment and exile (Deuteronomy 7:3-4).
Was Solomon's sin just about marrying foreign women, or something deeper?
While marrying foreign women was the direct violation of a specific command, Solomon's sin was fundamentally about a divided heart and a departure from singular devotion to God. His numerous foreign wives turned his heart after their gods, leading him to build altars for pagan deities and participate in their worship (1 Kings 11:4-8). This was a direct transgression of the covenant, which demanded exclusive loyalty to Yahweh. The foreign women were the conduit through which idolatry entered and corrupted his devotion, demonstrating that the external act reflected a deeper spiritual compromise and lack of wholehearted obedience.
Does this passage mean we shouldn't have friends or spouses from different cultural or religious backgrounds today?
This passage's primary warning is against spiritual compromise and idolatry, not against cultural diversity itself. For New Testament believers, the emphasis shifts from ethnic separation to spiritual alignment. The principle remains: believers are called to be "equally yoked" (2 Corinthians 6:14), meaning that deep, covenantal relationships like marriage should be with fellow believers who share a commitment to Christ and His Word. While we are called to love and minister to all people, forming intimate bonds that could compromise our faith or lead us away from God's truth is strongly cautioned against. The danger lies in influences that draw one away from Christ, not in the nationality or background of a person.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Nehemiah 13:26, with its tragic account of Solomon's fall, powerfully foreshadows the need for a perfect King who would not succumb to compromise. Solomon, despite being "beloved of his God" and endowed with unparalleled wisdom, ultimately failed to maintain covenant fidelity, allowing "outlandish women" to turn his heart to idolatry, leading to the division of his kingdom (1 Kings 11:11-13). This stark failure highlights humanity's inherent weakness and the inability of even the greatest earthly kings to perfectly uphold God's law. In contrast, Jesus Christ emerges as the true and ultimate King, the "beloved Son" of God (Matthew 3:17), who perfectly fulfilled all righteousness. Unlike Solomon, Jesus was tempted in every way, yet without sin (Hebrews 4:15), resisting every "outlandish" influence of the world, the flesh, and the devil. He did not take a foreign bride to turn His heart, but rather, as the Bridegroom, He gave His life for His Church, His pure bride (Ephesians 5:25-27), to sanctify her and present her without blemish. Through His perfect obedience and atoning sacrifice, Christ established a new covenant, where believers are empowered by the Holy Spirit to live in fidelity to God, overcoming the very temptations that caused Solomon's downfall. Thus, Nehemiah's warning points us to Christ, the King who never fails, whose unwavering devotion ensures the eternal purity and security of His spiritual kingdom.