Naar de inhoud

Nehemiah 11:1

“The Repopulation of Jerusalem”· Nehemiah 11:1–2Read in context
King James Version
¶ And the rulers of the people dwelt at Jerusalem: the rest of the people also cast lots, to bring one of ten to dwell in Jerusalem the holy city, and nine parts to dwell in other cities.
KJV (with Strong's)
And the rulers H8269 of the people H5971 dwelt H3427 at Jerusalem H3389: the rest H7605 of the people H5971 also cast H5307 lots H1486, to bring H935 one H259 of ten H6235 to dwell H3427 in Jerusalem H3389 the holy H6944 city H5892, and nine H8672 parts H3027 to dwell in other cities H5892.
Complete Jewish Bible
The leaders of the people took up residence in Yerushalayim; while the rest of the people cast lots to bring one-tenth of them to live in Yerushalayim the holy city, with the other nine-tenths in the other cities.
Berean Standard Bible
Now the leaders of the people settled in Jerusalem, and the rest of the people cast lots to bring one out of ten to live in the holy city of Jerusalem, while the remaining nine were to dwell in their own towns.
American Standard Version
And the princes of the people dwelt in Jerusalem: the rest of the people also cast lots, to bring one of ten to dwell in Jerusalem the holy city, and nine parts in theothercities.
World English Bible Messianic
The princes of the people lived in Jerusalem: the rest of the people also cast lots, to bring one of ten to dwell in Jerusalem the holy city, and nine parts in the other cities.
Geneva Bible (1599)
And the rulers of the people dwelt in Ierusalem: the other people also cast lottes, to bring one out of ten to dwel in Ierusalem the holy citie, and nine partes to be in the cities.
Young's Literal Translation
And the heads of the people dwell in Jerusalem, and the rest of the people have caused to fall lots to bring in one out of ten to dwell in Jerusalem the holy city, and nine parts in the cities,
Nederlands · STVE
Voorts woonden de oversten des volks te Jeruzalem; maar het overige des volks wierpen loten, om uit tien een uit te brengen, die in de heilige stad Jeruzalem zou wonen, en negen delen in de andere steden.
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 12,590 of 31,102 · 40.5%

Study this verse

Summary

Nehemiah 11:1 details a crucial administrative and spiritual initiative in the post-exilic restoration of Israel: the deliberate repopulation of Jerusalem. Following the successful rebuilding of its walls and a profound spiritual revival, the city, though fortified, remained sparsely inhabited. This verse describes the strategic decision by the community's leaders to bring a tenth of the people into Jerusalem, a process involving the casting of lots to ensure both fairness and divine guidance, thereby re-establishing the "holy city" as a vibrant, secure, and spiritually central hub for the nation.

Context

Literary Context

This verse immediately follows a period of intense physical and spiritual restoration in Jerusalem. Nehemiah chapters 1-6 meticulously detail the arduous and miraculous rebuilding of the city walls, culminating in their completion despite significant opposition from surrounding adversaries, as recorded in Nehemiah 6:15. Subsequently, chapters 7-10 describe a profound spiritual awakening, initiated by the public reading of the Law by Ezra, which sparked deep repentance and renewal among the people, as vividly portrayed in Nehemiah 8:1-8. This spiritual revival led to a national confession of sin and a renewed covenant commitment to God, thoroughly outlined in Nehemiah 9-10. With the physical infrastructure secure and the spiritual foundation renewed, the practical necessity of populating the city became paramount for its long-term viability and its role as the nation's heart. Nehemiah 11:1 thus represents a crucial transition from external and internal rebuilding to demographic and civic re-establishment, ensuring the city's future.

Historical & Cultural Context

The events of Nehemiah unfold during the Persian period, approximately a century after the first wave of exiles returned from Babylon. While the Temple had been rebuilt under Zerubbabel and Joshua, and Ezra had initiated significant religious reforms, Jerusalem itself remained vulnerable and critically underpopulated. Many returnees had settled in surrounding towns and villages, where life might have been more stable and economically viable. Living within Jerusalem's newly rebuilt walls likely presented challenges, including potential economic hardship, greater exposure to external threats, and a constant need for vigilance to maintain security. The practice of "casting lots" was a common and accepted method in ancient Israel for discerning God's will in important matters, such as the distribution of land (Numbers 26:55-56), the assignment of priestly duties (1 Chronicles 24:5), or selecting individuals for specific tasks. This method underscored a deep reliance on divine providence in critical communal decisions, ensuring that the outcome was perceived as God's choice rather than mere human preference.

Key Themes

Nehemiah 11:1 powerfully articulates several core themes central to the book and the broader post-exilic narrative. The verse highlights a collective burden and a shared commitment to the nation's spiritual and physical well-being. Populating Jerusalem was not merely an administrative task but an act of communal sacrifice, as those chosen to move likely left more comfortable or established lives in the provincial towns. This act demonstrates a willingness to prioritize the common good and the restoration of God's city over individual convenience, echoing principles of mutual support and burden-bearing found elsewhere in Scripture, such as Galatians 6:2. The decision to "cast lots" underscores the belief that God's sovereign hand was guiding this crucial undertaking. While human leaders, including Nehemiah and the "rulers of the people," initiated the process and organized the selection, the use of lots indicated a profound reliance on divine direction for the outcome. This reflects a biblical pattern where human planning and effort are undertaken in humble dependence on God's ultimate will, as articulated in Proverbs 16:33. This verse is a tangible manifestation of the ongoing process of Israel's restoration. Beyond the physical rebuilding of walls and the spiritual renewal of the people, the demographic re-establishment of Jerusalem was essential for the city to fulfill its destiny as the "holy city" and the vibrant center of Jewish life. It signifies a return to normalcy and a fulfillment of prophetic promises regarding Jerusalem's future prosperity and habitation, as seen in passages like Isaiah 44:26.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

gôwrâl gôwrâl' H1486

This term, translated as "lots," properly refers to a pebble, used for determining a lot. Figuratively, it signifies a portion or destiny as if determined by lot. In biblical contexts, casting lots was not merely a game of chance but a divinely sanctioned method for discerning God's will or for making important allocations (e.g., land, priestly duties, or, as here, residency). The use of gôwrâl here underscores the gravity of the decision and the community's desire for God's guidance in repopulating His holy city, implying that the outcome was ultimately determined by God, removing human bias and ensuring a sense of divine approval.

yâshab yâshab' H3427

Translated as "dwell," this primitive root properly means "to sit down," but by implication, it extends to "to dwell" or "to remain." Causatively, it can mean "to settle" or "to marry." In this context, it emphasizes the act of establishing permanent residence. The command to "dwell" in Jerusalem was not a temporary assignment but a call to settle there, contributing to the city's long-term stability, security, and spiritual vitality. It speaks to the intentionality of creating a thriving, inhabited center for the restored community.

qôdesh qôdesh' H6944

This word, translated as "holy" in "the holy city," refers to a sacred place or thing, and abstractly, to sanctity. It signifies something consecrated, dedicated, or hallowed, set apart for God's purposes. This designation for Jerusalem is profoundly significant, emphasizing its unique consecrated status, chosen by God for His dwelling and worship. The repopulation effort was not just about urban planning but about restoring the spiritual heart of the nation, ensuring that the place God had chosen would be inhabited by His people, reflecting its divine setting apart.

Verse Breakdown

"And the rulers of the people dwelt at Jerusalem"

This opening clause indicates that the leadership had already taken the initiative, setting an example by residing in the capital. Their presence was crucial for governance, security, and establishing a visible commitment to the city's revival. It suggests a top-down leadership that also involved the people in a shared responsibility for the city's future.

"the rest of the people also cast lots"

This phrase reveals the method chosen for the broader repopulation effort. "The rest of the people" refers to those who had settled in the surrounding towns and villages. The act of "casting lots" signifies a communal decision-making process, believed to be guided by divine providence, ensuring fairness and a sense of shared destiny in this significant undertaking.

"to bring one of ten to dwell in Jerusalem the holy city"

This specifies the proportion of the population designated to move to Jerusalem. A tenth (10%) was a significant number, representing a substantial commitment from the wider community. The phrase "the holy city" reiterates Jerusalem's sacred status, emphasizing that this repopulation was not just for practical reasons but to restore its spiritual significance and function as the consecrated center of Israelite life.

"and nine parts [to dwell] in [other] cities"

This concluding clause clarifies that the majority of the population remained in their established homes. This demonstrates a balanced and pragmatic approach, ensuring that other towns and villages were not unduly depopulated, thereby maintaining the broader infrastructure and economic viability of the post-exilic Jewish community while strategically strengthening the capital.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several literary devices to convey its profound meaning. Metonymy is evident in the phrase "Jerusalem the holy city," where Jerusalem stands not just for a physical location but for the spiritual and national identity of Israel itself. The act of populating the city is thus a metonymic representation of restoring the nation's core. Symbolism is also prominent: the "casting of lots" symbolizes the community's reliance on divine providence and guidance in a critical decision, affirming that God's hand was in the process of restoration. Furthermore, the very designation "holy city" is symbolic, representing God's unique covenant relationship with Jerusalem and His people, and underscoring its sacred purpose as the center of worship and divine presence. These devices collectively amplify the theological weight of this seemingly administrative act, portraying it as a divinely orchestrated step in Israel's post-exilic renewal.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Nehemiah 11:1 encapsulates a profound theological truth about God's faithfulness to His covenant promises and the necessity of human cooperation in His redemptive plan. The repopulation of Jerusalem, the "holy city," is a tangible expression of God's commitment to restore His people and His dwelling place among them after the exile. It underscores the tension between divine sovereignty, as evidenced by the casting of lots which implied God's ultimate determination, and human responsibility, seen in the strategic planning of the leaders and the willing sacrifice of the people. This act reaffirms Jerusalem's unique status as the chosen city for God's Name to dwell, the center of Israel's worship, and a beacon of hope for the future. It demonstrates that true restoration encompasses not just physical structures and spiritual renewal, but also the vibrant habitation of God's people in the place He has consecrated.

Reflection and Application

Nehemiah 11:1 offers a powerful contemporary lesson for believers about community, sacrifice, and discerning God's call. Just as the post-exilic community was called to contribute to the repopulation of Jerusalem, sometimes at personal cost, we too are called to invest in the spiritual health and vitality of our own "holy cities"—our local churches, communities, and mission fields. Building God's kingdom today often requires both strategic leadership and the willing, sacrificial participation of ordinary people. We may be called to step into roles that are less comfortable, more demanding, or require a significant personal "move" or commitment, much like those who were chosen to dwell in the challenging but vital Jerusalem. This verse encourages us to be available for God's purposes, trusting that He guides our circumstances and callings, whether through clear directives or seemingly random opportunities, always for the greater good of His work and the flourishing of His people. It challenges us to consider where our presence and resources are most needed to strengthen God's kingdom, even if it means leaving our comfort zones.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what ways might God be calling me to "dwell in Jerusalem"—that is, to step into a place of greater service or sacrifice for His kingdom, even if it's uncomfortable or less convenient?
  2. How can I discern God's will in important decisions, balancing careful planning with a humble reliance on His sovereign guidance, much like the casting of lots?
  3. What "holy city" (community, church, or mission) am I called to invest in, contributing to its spiritual vitality and strength, even if it requires personal sacrifice?

FAQ

Why was it necessary to cast lots? Couldn't the leaders simply assign people?

While the leaders certainly had authority, casting lots was a deeply ingrained and respected method in ancient Israel for discerning divine will in significant matters. It served several crucial purposes beyond mere assignment. Firstly, it ensured fairness and impartiality, preventing accusations of favoritism or undue burden placed on specific families. Secondly, and most importantly, it placed the ultimate decision in God's hands, reinforcing the belief that this repopulation effort was divinely sanctioned and guided, not merely a human administrative decree. This would have made the difficult and potentially sacrificial move more palatable for the populace, as they perceived it as God's choice for them. It reflects a profound trust in God's sovereignty over human affairs, as seen in Proverbs 16:33.

What was the significance of "Jerusalem the holy city"?

The designation "Jerusalem the holy city" underscores its unique and sacred status in God's plan. It was the place God specifically chose for His Name to dwell (Deuteronomy 12:5), where the Temple stood as the focal point of Israel's worship and where God's presence was manifested. Its holiness was tied to God's covenant with Israel and His redemptive purposes for the world. Populating it was essential not just for civic stability but for restoring its spiritual prominence and ensuring that the center of God's worship was vibrant and secure. This title emphasizes that the repopulation was a spiritual act, essential for the full restoration of God's people and their relationship with God.

Why only one in ten? Why not more or fewer?

The "one in ten" proportion was likely a pragmatic and balanced decision. While Jerusalem desperately needed more inhabitants for security, economic activity, and civic life, the majority of the returnees had already established homes and livelihoods in surrounding towns and villages. Depopulating these areas would have created new problems for the broader Jewish community. A tenth was a significant enough number to make a substantial difference in Jerusalem's population while not unduly disrupting the broader community. This proportion may also carry symbolic resonance, echoing the tithe (a tenth) as a consecrated portion offered to God, signifying that those who moved were a dedicated offering for the city's restoration. It represented a collective commitment and sacrifice from the entire community for the good of the capital, demonstrating wise stewardship of both human and economic resources.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

The repopulation of Jerusalem, the "holy city," in Nehemiah 11:1 profoundly foreshadows the ultimate spiritual Jerusalem, the Church, which is built by Christ and populated by those called by Him. Just as the physical city was restored to be God's dwelling place, so too is Jesus Christ the true Temple, the ultimate dwelling of God among humanity, as He declared in John 2:19-21. The sacrificial act of those who moved to Jerusalem, leaving their established lives for the good of the community, points to Christ's ultimate and perfect sacrifice, which enables the gathering of God's people from "every tribe and language and people and nation" into His spiritual kingdom, as beautifully depicted in Revelation 5:9. Through His finished work on the cross, Jesus casts the "lot" for our spiritual inheritance, drawing us into His body, the Church, making us fellow heirs according to His purpose (Ephesians 1:11). We, as believers, are called to be living stones built into a spiritual house, a holy priesthood, offering spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ (1 Peter 2:5). The ultimate fulfillment of the "holy city" is the New Jerusalem, described in Revelation 21:2, where God will dwell with His people forever, a city needing no temple because the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple (Revelation 21:22).

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Nehemiah 11:1–19. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 19 verses
Passage under commentNehemiah 11:1–19
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Jerusalem is called here the holy city (Neh 11:1), because there the temple was, and that was the place God had chosen to put his name there; upon this account, one would think, the holy seed should all have chosen to dwell there and have striven for a habitation there; but, on the contrary, it seems they declined dwelling there, 1. Because a greater strictness of conversation was expected from the inhabitants of Jerusalem than from others, which they were not willing to come up to. Those who care not for being holy themselves are shy of dwelling in a holy city; they would not dwell in the New Jerusalem itself for that reason, but would wish to have a continuing city here upon earth. Or, 2. Because Jerusalem, of all places, was most hated by the heathen their neighbours, and against it their malicious designs were levelled, which made that the post of danger (as the post of honour usually is) and therefore they were not willing to expose themselves there. Fear of persecution and reproach, and of running themselves into trouble, keeps many out of the holy city, and makes them backward to appear for God and religion, not considering that, as Jerusalem is with a special malice threatened and insulted by its enemies, so it is with a special care protected by its God and made a quiet habitation, Isa 33:20; Psa 46:4, Psa 46:5. Or, 3. Because it was more for their worldly advantage to dwell in the country. Jerusalem was no trading city, and therefore there was no money to be got there by merchandise, as there was in the country by corn and cattle. Note, All seek their own, not the things that are Jesus Christ's, Phi 2:21. It is a general and just complaint that most people prefer their own wealth, credit, pleasure, ease, and safety, before the glory of God and the public good. People being thus backward to dwell at Jerusalem, now that it was poor, we are here told,

I.By what means it was replenished.

1.The rulers dwelt there, Neh 11:1. That was the proper place for them to reside in, because there were set the thrones of judgment (Psa 122:5), and thither, in all difficult matters, the people resorted with their last appeals. And if it were an instance of eminent affection to the house of God, zeal for the public good, and of faith, and holy courage, and self-denial, to dwell there at this time, the rulers would be examples of these to their inferiors. Their dwelling there would invite and encourage others to dwell there too. Magnates magnetes - the mighty are magnetic. When great men choose the holy city for their habitation their example brings holiness into reputation, and their zeal will provoke very many.

2.There were some that willingly offered themselves to dwell at Jerusalem, nobly foregoing their own secular interest for the public welfare, Neh 11:2. It is upon record, to their honour, that when others were shy of venturing upon difficulty, loss, and danger, they sought the good of Jerusalem, because of the house of the Lord their God. Those shall prosper that thus love Zion, Psa 122:6, Psa 122:9. It is said, The people blessed them. They praised them; they prayed for them; they praised God for them. Many that do not appear forward themselves for the public good will yet give a good word to those that do. God and man will bless those that are public blessings, which should encourage us to be zealous in doing good.

3.They, finding that yet there was room, concluded upon a review of their whole body to bring one in ten to dwell in Jerusalem; who they should be was determined by lot, the disposal whereof, all knew, was of the Lord. This would prevent strife, and would be a great satisfaction to those on whom the lot fell to dwell at Jerusalem, that they plainly saw God appointing the bounds of their habitation. They observed the proportion of one in ten, as we may suppose, to bring the balance between the city and country to a just and equal poise; so it seems to refer to the ancient rule of giving the tenth to God; and what is given to the holy city he reckons given to himself.

II.By what persons it was replenished.

A general account is here given of the inhabitants of Jerusalem because the governors of Judah looked upon them as their strength in the Lord of hosts their God, and valued them accordingly, Zac 12:5.

1.Many of the children of Judah and Benjamin dwelt there; for, originally, part of the city law in the lot of one of those tribes and part in that of the other; but the greater part was in the lot of Benjamin, and therefore here we find of the children of Judah only 468 families in Jerusalem (Neh 11:6), but of Benjamin 928, Neh 11:7, Neh 11:8. Thus small were its beginnings, but afterwards, before our Saviour's time, it grew much more populous. Those of Judah all descended from Perez, or Pharez, that son of Judah of whom, as concerning the flesh, Christ came. And, though the Benjamites were more in number, yet of the men of Judah it is said (Neh 11:6) that they were valiant men, fit for service, and able to defend the city in case of an attack. Judah has not lost its ancient character of a lion's whelp, bold and daring. Of the Benjamites that dwelt in Jerusalem we are here told who was overseer, and who was second, Neh 11:9. For it is as necessary for a people to have good order kept up among themselves as to be fortified against the attacks of their enemies from abroad, to have good magistrates as to have good soldiers.

2.The priests and Levites did many of them settle at Jerusalem; where else should men that were holy to God dwell, but in the holy city?

(1.)Most of the priests, we may suppose, dwelt there, for their business lay where the temple was. Of those that did the work of the house in their courses here were 822 of one family, 242 of another, and 128 of another, Neh 11:12-14. It was well that those labourers were not few. It is said of some of them that they were mighty men of valour (Neh 11:14); it was necessary that they should be so, for the priesthood was not only a work, which required might, but a warfare, which required valour, especially now. Of one of these priests it is said that he was the son of one of the great men. It was no disparagement to the greatest man they had to have his son in the priesthood; he might magnify his office, for his office did not in the least diminish him.

(2.)Some of the Levites also came and dwelt at Jerusalem, yet but few in comparison, 284 in all (Neh 11:18), with 172 porters (Neh 11:19), for much of their work was to teach the good knowledge of God up and down the country, for which purpose they were to be scattered in Israel. As many as there was occasion for attended at Jerusalem; the rest were doing good elsewhere.

[1.]It is said of one of the Levites that he had the oversight of the outward business of the house of God, Neh 11:16. The priests were chief managers of the business within the temple gates; but this Levite was entrusted with the secular concerns of God's house, that were in ordine ad spiritualia - subservient to its spiritual concerns, the collecting of the contributions, the providing of materials for the temple service, and the like, which it was necessary to oversee, else the inward business would have been starved and have stood still. Those who take care of the ta exō the outward concerns of the church, the serving of its tables, are as necessary in their place as those who take care of its ta esō its inward concerns, who give themselves to the word and prayer.

[2.]It is said of another that he was the principal to begin the thanksgiving in prayer. Probably he had a good ear and a good voice, and was a scientific singer, and therefore was chosen to lead the psalm. He was precentor in the temple. Observe, Thanksgiving is necessary in prayer; they should go together; giving thanks for former mercies is a becoming way of begging further mercies. And care should be taken in public service that every thing be done in the best manner, decently and in good order - in prayer, that one speak and the rest join-in singing, that one begin and the rest follow.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Historical Reception

One surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.

1 quote · AD 735
AD 735BedeEarly MedievalSourceCommentary on Ezra and Nehemiah
Now the leaders of the people lived in Jerusalem. etc. The arrangement that had been begun right after the rebuilding of the city is now complete; but up to this time, it could not be finished before the numbering of the people and the completion of the solemnities of the seventh month, so that it might be determined who should live in the holy city itself and who in the other towns. It is fitting regarding the figures of the sacraments that the leaders of the people are said to have lived in Jerusalem. For it is proper that the prelates of the holy Church should surpass the people as much in the merits of their life as they surpass them in the height of their power. Indeed, the other cities of Israel signify the devout conversation of God's people. But the habitation of the people of Jerusalem especially represents the deeds of those who, having overcome the struggle against vices, approach the vision of supreme peace with a free mind, according to that verse of the Psalmist: "The Lord loves the gates of Zion more than all the dwellings of Jacob" (Psalm 87). Hence, subsequently, a tenth part of the people was chosen by lot to receive habitation in Jerusalem, while the other nine parts resided in their own towns; because it is indeed the privilege of the perfect—those who fully keep the precepts of the Decalogue in the love of God and neighbor—to approach the heavenly secrets with their minds and to imitate, if I may say so, the peace of supreme blessedness amid the turmoil of a fleeting life. Although the gate to eternal life is open to those who keep God's general commandments, as the Lord declares to the rich man who questioned Him in the Gospel. Such people dwell, as it were, in the cities given to them by the Lord, because they vigilantly guard themselves against the snares of the ancient enemy by adhering to the divine law. But those who wish to be perfect, having sold all that they have and distributed it to the poor, and thus follow the Lord, these dwell, as it were, in the citadel of Jerusalem, close to the temple of God and the ark of the covenant, because they approach more intimately the grace of their Creator. It is well said that their habitation in the holy city was not due to human choice, but by the casting of lots, just as the possession of other cities was given by lot to the children of Israel in the time of Joshua; because indeed both small and great blessings are received not by the freedom or effort of one's own will but by the gift of the hidden Judge and Giver.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Nehemiah 11:1 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8