TRV
Translation
King James Version
Then assembled together the chief priests, and the scribes, and the elders of the people, unto the palace of the high priest, who was called Caiaphas,
Complete Jewish Bible
Then the head cohanim and the elders of the people gathered in the palace of Kayafa the cohen hagadol.
Berean Standard Bible
At that time the chief priests and elders of the people assembled in the courtyard of the high priest, whose name was Caiaphas,
American Standard Version
Then were gathered together the chief priests, and the elders of the people, unto the court of the high priest, who was called Caiaphas;
World English Bible Messianic
Then the chief priests, the scribes, and the elders of the people were gathered together in the court of the high priest, who was called Caiaphas.
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then assembled together the chiefe Priests, and the Scribes, and the Elders of ye people into the hall of the high Priest called Caiaphas:
Young's Literal Translation
Then were gathered together the chief priests, and the scribes, and the elders of the people, to the court of the chief priest who was called Caiaphas;
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 24,058 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers . Public domain.
Copy as
Origen of Alexandria (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 253
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Not true Priests and elders, but Priests and elders of what seemed the people of God, but was indeed the people of Gomorrah; these, not knowing God's High Priest, laid a plot against Him, not recognising the firstborn of the whole creation, (Col. 1:15.) yea, even against Him that was elder than them all, did they take counsel.
Origen of AlexandriaAD 253
COMMENTARY ON MATTHEW 76
The words of the prophet, "And the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and his anointed," were fulfilled when "the chief priests and elders of the people gathered in the court of the high priest" and took counsel together "against the Lord and his anointed." They were not true priests but "of the people" and "elders." They only seemed to be the people of God but were after all the people of Gomorrah. It was they who would say, "Crucify him! Crucify him!" and "Away from the earth with such a one!" Furthermore, what Isaiah said, "Hear the word of the Lord, O leaders of Sodom; pay heed to God's law, O people of Gomorrah," applies to the Jewish leaders who lived at the time of Christ. And what Ezekiel said to Jerusalem, "It will be more tolerable for the land of Sodom than for you," can be said more rightly of Jeru-salem, over which the Lord wept, than of the time of the prophet. The chief priests sinned more greatly than Sodom. They did not recognize God's high priest but plotted against him. The elders of the people, not knowing the "firstborn of every creature" and the one who is older than all creatures, took counsel against him. Jerusalem was forsaken at that so-called court where "they took counsel together how they might seize Jesus by stealth." Unfortunately this was the city that first killed the prophets and then the Lord of the prophets. That city took action against the founder of the whole world.
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on the Gospel of Matthew 79
"Then were assembled together the chief priests, and the scribes, and the elders of the people, in the palace of the high priest, who was called Caiaphas, and consulted that they might take Jesus by subtlety, and kill Him. But they said, Not on the feast day, lest there be an uproar among the people."
Seest thou the unspeakable corruption of the Jewish state? Attempting unlawful acts, they come to the high priest, desiring to obtain their authority from that quarter, whence they ought to have found hindrance.
And how many high priests were there? For the law wills there should be one, but then there were many. Whence it is manifest, that the Jewish constitution had begun to dissolve. For Moses, as I said, commanded there should be one, and that when he was dead there should be another, and by the life of this person He measured the banishment of them that had involuntarily committed manslaughter. How then were there at that time many high priests? They were afterwards made for a year. And this the evangelist declared, when he was speaking of Zacharias, saying, that he was of the course of Abia. Those therefore doth he here call high priests, who had been high priests.
What did they consult together? That they might seize Him secretly, or that they might put Him to death? Both; for they feared the people. Wherefore also they waited for the feast to be past; for "they said, Not on the feast day." For the devil, lest he should make the passion conspicuous, was not willing it should take place at the passover; but they, lest there should be an uproar. Mark them then ever fearing, not the ills from God, neither lest any greater pollution should arise to them from the season, but in every case the ills from men.
Yet for all this, boiling with anger, they changed their purpose again. For though they had said, "Not at the feast time;" when they found the traitor, they waited not for the time, but slew Him at the feast. But why did they take Him then? They were boiling with rage, as I said; and they expected then to find Him, and all things they did as blinded. For though He Himself made the greatest use of their wickedness for His own dispensation, they were not surely for this guiltless, but deserving of inflictions without number for their temper of mind. At least when all should be set free, even the guilty, then these men slew the guiltless, Him that had conferred on them countless benefits, and who for a time had neglected the Gentiles for their sake.
John Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 407
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
With such ill designs they came to the chief Priest, seeking a sanction whence a prohibition should have issued. There were at that time several Chief Priests, while the Law allowed but of one, whence it was manifest that the dissolution of the Jewish state was having its beginning. For Moses had commanded that there should be one Chief Priest, whose office should be filled up at death; but in process of time it grew to be annual. All those then who had been Chief Priests1, are here called Chief Priests.
For what then did they conspire, to seize Him secretly, or put Him to death? For both; but they feared the people, and therefore waited till the feast was over, for they said, not on the feast-day. For the Devil would not that Christ should suffer at the Passover, that His Passion might not be notorious. The Chief Priests had no fear in respect of God, namely, that their guilt might be aggravated by the season, but took into account human things only, Lest there be an uproar among the people.
But their fury set aside their caution, and finding a betrayer, they put Christ to death in the middle of the feast.
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Matthew
(Ver. 3 and following) Then the chief priests and the elders of the people gathered in the courtyard of the high priest, who was called Caiaphas, and they plotted to arrest Jesus by trickery and kill him. But they said, 'Not during the feast, lest there be an uproar among the people.' Now those who were supposed to prepare the Passover sacrifices, cleanse the walls of the temple, sweep the floors, purify the vessels, and be ritually purified according to the Law in order to be worthy to eat the Passover lamb, were gathered together to devise a plan on how to kill the Lord, not fearing rebellion, as the simple words show; but careful that they were not hindered by the help of the people.
Leo the Great (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 461
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(Serm. 58, 2.) This precaution of the Chief Priests arose not from reverence for the festival, but from care for the success of their plot; they feared an insurrection at that season, not because of the guilt the populace might thereby incur, but because they might rescue Christ.
(Serm. 58, 1.) We recognise here a providential arrangement whereby the chief men of the Jews, who had often sought occasion of effecting their cruel purposes against Christ, could never yet succeed till the days of the paschal celebration. For it behoved that the things which had long been promised in symbol and mystery should be accomplished in manifest reality, that the typical lamb should be displaced by the true, and one sacrifice embrace the whole catalogue of the varied victims. That shadows should give way to substance, and copies to the presence of the original; victim is commuted for victim, blood is abolished by blood, and the festival of the Law is at once fulfilled and changed.
Remigius of Rheims (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 533
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
This, then, is to be referred to the preceding words, and means before the Feast of the Passover.
They are condemned both because they were gathered together, and because they were the Chief Priests; for the more the numbers, and the higher the rank and station of those who band together for any villany, the greater the enormity of what they do, and the heavier the punishment stored up for them. To show the Lord's innocence and openness, the Evangelist adds, that they might take Jesus by subtilty, and kill him.
Glossa Ordinaria (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1274
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(non occ.) Then the Evangelist lays before us the hidden springs and machinery by which the Lord's Passion was brought to pass.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying Matthew 26:3 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Matthew 26:3 marks a pivotal moment in the Passion narrative, detailing the formal assembly of the Jewish religious leadership—the chief priests, scribes, and elders—at the residence of Caiaphas, the high priest. This clandestine gathering was convened with the explicit and sinister purpose of devising a strategy to apprehend Jesus by stealth and ultimately put Him to death, setting the stage for the events of His betrayal, trial, and crucifixion.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The verse employs several literary devices to convey its profound significance. Foreshadowing is prominent, as this clandestine meeting directly sets the stage for Jesus' arrest, trial, and crucifixion, fulfilling His earlier predictions. The narrative creates a powerful Contrast between the genuine devotion shown by the woman who anoints Jesus in the preceding passage and the malevolent conspiracy brewing among the religious leaders. This highlights the spiritual blindness of those in power compared to the insight of a humble follower. Furthermore, there is a strong sense of Irony in the fact that the very custodians of God's Law and the spiritual leaders of Israel are the ones plotting against the Messiah, the embodiment of divine truth. The "palace of the high priest" functions as a Symbol of institutional religious authority, now corrupted and turned against God's Anointed One.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
This verse underscores the profound theological truth that humanity, even in its most religious forms, can actively reject God's revelation and His Anointed One. The assembly of the Sanhedrin is not merely a political maneuver but a spiritual rebellion against the divine will, demonstrating the human heart's capacity for hardened unbelief and the corrupting influence of power. Their plot, though driven by fear and self-preservation, ultimately serves God's sovereign plan for redemption, illustrating how even evil intentions can be woven into the fabric of divine purpose. This meeting is a stark reminder that true faith is not found in religious office or institutional adherence, but in humble submission to Christ.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Matthew 26:3 serves as a sobering mirror, prompting us to examine the depths of our own hearts and the nature of our faith. It reveals the perilous danger of religious hypocrisy and the insidious way that power, tradition, and self-interest can blind even those who claim to serve God to the truth of His Son. The Sanhedrin, entrusted with spiritual leadership, became agents of opposition, demonstrating that outward religious observance does not guarantee inward spiritual discernment. This challenges us to consistently evaluate whether our allegiance is truly to Christ and His kingdom, or to human institutions, personal influence, or comfortable traditions. It calls for humility, a willingness to be corrected by God's Word, and a vigilant guarding against the pride and fear that can lead us away from genuine devotion.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Who were the "chief priests, scribes, and elders" mentioned in this verse?
Answer: These three groups collectively formed the Sanhedrin, the supreme Jewish religious and judicial council in Jerusalem. The "chief priests" included the high priest, former high priests, and the heads of the major priestly families. The "scribes" were legal experts and interpreters of the Mosaic Law, often associated with the Pharisees. The "elders" were respected lay leaders, typically heads of prominent families or clans, representing the aristocracy and influential citizens. Together, they represented the highest religious and political authority within Jewish society under Roman rule.
Why did they assemble at Caiaphas's palace?
Answer: Caiaphas was the reigning high priest at the time, and his "palace" (aulḗ) served as the official residence and a de facto meeting place for the Sanhedrin. As the president of the council, it was natural for him to host such a critical and sensitive meeting. The choice of his palace underscored the official and authoritative nature of their gathering, signifying that the plot against Jesus was not a fringe idea but a decision made at the highest levels of Jewish religious power.
What was the ultimate goal of this assembly?
Answer: The primary goal of this assembly, as stated in the subsequent verses (Matthew 26:4), was to "seize Jesus by stealth and kill Him." They sought to eliminate Jesus because His teachings, miracles, and growing popularity challenged their authority, traditions, and understanding of the Messiah. They feared He would incite a Roman crackdown or undermine their established power structure. Their aim was to accomplish this quietly, "not during the feast, lest there be an uproar among the people."
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The assembly of the chief priests, scribes, and elders at Caiaphas's palace, plotting to kill Jesus, is a profound moment of Christ-centered fulfillment. Far from being a mere human conspiracy, this event, born of fear and malice, was paradoxically part of God's predetermined plan for the redemption of humanity. The rejection of Jesus by the religious leaders, the very people who should have recognized and welcomed their Messiah, was a necessary step in the unfolding of God's redemptive narrative. As the suffering servant prophesied in Isaiah 53, Jesus was "oppressed and afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth" (Isaiah 53:7). The New Testament consistently affirms that Jesus' death was not a tragic accident but a deliberate act of God's sovereign will, accomplished through human agency. Peter declared that Jesus was "delivered up according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God" (Acts 2:23). Christ, the true High Priest, willingly submitted to this plot, not as a helpless victim, but as the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29). His obedience "to the point of death, even death on a cross" (Philippians 2:8) transformed the council's evil intent into the means of salvation, demonstrating that even the darkest human acts cannot thwart God's glorious purpose, but rather serve to bring about the ultimate triumph of His Son.