Zum Inhalt springen

Matthew 26:16

“Judas Agrees to Betray Jesus”· Matthew 26:14–16Read in context
King James Version
And from that time he sought opportunity to betray him.
KJV (with Strong's)
And G2532 from G575 that time G5119 he sought G2212 opportunity G2120 to G2443 betray G3860 him G846.
Complete Jewish Bible
From then on he looked for a good opportunity to betray him.
Berean Standard Bible
So from then on Judas looked for an opportunity to betray Jesus.
American Standard Version
And from that time he sought opportunity to deliver him unto them.
World English Bible Messianic
From that time he sought opportunity to betray him.
Geneva Bible (1599)
And from that time, he sought opportunitie to betraie him.
Young's Literal Translation
and from that time he was seeking a convenient season to deliver him up.
Deutsch · Schlachter
Und von da an suchte er eine gute Gelegenheit, ihn zu verraten.
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
All Matthew Sites (Jerusalem)
All Matthew Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
Matthew 26:1-16, Matthew 26:17-25, Mark 11:12-26, Mark 11:27-33, Luke 10:38-42, John 12:12-18
Matthew 26:1-16, Matthew 26:17-25, Mark 11:12-26, Mark 11:27-33, Luke 10:38-42, John 12:12-18 View full PDF
The Last Week of Jesus' Life (With Reference Table)
The Last Week of Jesus' Life (With Reference Table) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 24,071 of 31,102 · 77.4%

Study this verse

Summary

Matthew 26:16 marks a sinister turning point in the passion narrative, depicting Judas Iscariot's deliberate and active pursuit of an opportune moment to betray Jesus. Following his agreement with the chief priests for thirty pieces of silver, this verse reveals Judas's calculated intent to deliver his Master into the hands of His enemies, initiating the final, tragic sequence of events leading to Jesus's arrest, trial, and crucifixion.

Context

Literary Context

This verse immediately follows the chilling agreement between Judas and the chief priests in Matthew 26:14-15, where Judas pledges to betray Jesus for thirty pieces of silver. It serves as a direct consequence and active progression of that prior decision. The narrative then moves swiftly towards the preparation for the Passover, the Last Supper, Jesus's prophecy of betrayal, and the institution of the new covenant, all building inexorably towards the ultimate act of betrayal in Matthew 26:47-50. This verse underscores the intentionality of Judas's actions, setting the stage for the unfolding drama.

Historical & Cultural Context

The events of Matthew 26 take place during the Passover festival, a time of heightened religious fervor and pilgrimage in Jerusalem. The city would have been crowded, and the Jewish authorities, particularly the chief priests and elders, were wary of any public disturbance, especially one involving Jesus, who had a large following. Judas's search for an "opportunity" (G2120, eukairía) implies a desire to betray Jesus in a way that avoided public outcry or a riot, facilitating a quiet arrest away from the crowds, likely at night. This highlights the political and social sensitivities surrounding Jesus's ministry and the authorities' determination to eliminate Him without provoking the populace.

Key Themes

Matthew 26:16 contributes significantly to several major themes within the Gospel of Matthew and the broader biblical narrative. It powerfully illustrates the theme of Deliberate Betrayal, emphasizing Judas's active and calculated role in the events, rather than a passive yielding to circumstances. It also highlights the complex interplay of Human Agency and Divine Sovereignty, where Judas's sinful choice, driven by avarice (as implied in John 12:6), perfectly aligns with God's preordained plan for salvation through the sacrifice of His Son. Furthermore, it underscores the Fulfillment of Prophecy, as Judas's actions, particularly the price of betrayal, echo ancient prophecies concerning the Messiah, such as those found in Zechariah 11:12-13 and Psalm 41:9.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

sought zētéō' G2212

Meaning "to seek (literally or figuratively)." In this context, it implies an active, deliberate, and continuous search. It's not a passive waiting but an intentional effort to find the right moment. The verb's imperfect tense in Greek ("he was seeking") reinforces the idea of ongoing action.

opportunity eukairía' G2120

Meaning "a favorable occasion," "a fitting time," or "a convenient season." This term suggests that Judas was looking for the ideal circumstances—a moment when Jesus could be apprehended without resistance or public spectacle, thereby minimizing risk to himself and the authorities.

betray paradídōmi' G3860

Meaning "to surrender, i.e. yield up, intrust, transmit." While it can mean "deliver" in a neutral sense, in this context, given Judas's intent and the preceding agreement, it carries the sinister connotation of "betrayal"—handing over someone to their enemies, often by treachery or breach of trust.

Verse Breakdown

"And from that time"

This phrase, using the Greek G5119 (tóte) for "time" and G575 (apó) for "from," directly links Judas's active seeking to the moment he made the agreement with the chief priests in Matthew 26:15. It signifies an immediate and decisive shift in his actions, moving from negotiation to execution.

"he sought opportunity"

This clause highlights Judas's active agency and calculated intent. He was not merely waiting for circumstances to unfold but was proactively looking for the "opportune" (G2120, eukairía) moment. This implies a strategic mindset, desiring to carry out the betrayal efficiently and without incident, likely avoiding a public confrontation.

"to betray him"

This final phrase clearly states the heinous purpose of Judas's search. The verb "betray" (G3860, paradídōmi) in this context is loaded with the weight of treachery, underscoring the profound breach of trust by one of Jesus's own disciples. It encapsulates the ultimate goal of his malevolent quest.

Literary Devices

The verse employs Foreshadowing by signaling the imminent and deliberate act of betrayal, building narrative tension towards the climax of Jesus's arrest. The phrase "from that time" functions as a Transitional Marker, indicating a critical shift in the narrative from the agreement to the active pursuit of its execution. The entire verse is an example of Irony, as a disciple, chosen to follow and learn from Jesus, actively plots against Him, demonstrating the profound spiritual blindness and moral corruption that can occur even in proximity to divine truth. This also sets up a Contrast between Jesus's unwavering commitment to His mission and Judas's calculated treachery.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Matthew 26:16 underscores the profound theological truth that even the most heinous acts of human sin can be woven into God's sovereign plan for redemption. While Judas's actions were undeniably wicked and driven by personal greed, they ultimately served to bring about the preordained sacrifice of Christ, fulfilling numerous Old Testament prophecies. This verse, therefore, highlights the paradox of divine sovereignty and human responsibility, where God's purposes are accomplished not by overriding human will, but by incorporating it, even its darkest expressions, into His grand design. It reminds us that God is never caught off guard and can bring about good even from evil.

Reflection and Application

Matthew 26:16 serves as a sobering reminder of the insidious nature of sin, particularly greed and the betrayal of trust. Judas's active "seeking" of an opportunity reveals a heart fully committed to his treacherous path, illustrating how unchecked desires can lead to profound spiritual compromise and ultimately, an irreparable break with God. This prompts us to examine our own hearts, to be vigilant against the subtle encroachments of sin, and to recognize that spiritual compromise often begins with small, seemingly insignificant choices that, if left unchecked, can lead to catastrophic outcomes. It challenges us to cultivate a spirit of loyalty and faithfulness, not just in grand gestures, but in the quiet, daily decisions of our lives, ensuring that our allegiances remain firmly with Christ, even when tested by temptation or worldly allure.

Questions for Reflection

  1. What "opportunities" might we be seeking in our lives that could lead us away from Christ, even subtly?
  2. How does Judas's deliberate action challenge our understanding of spiritual vigilance and the danger of unchecked desires?
  3. In what ways can we strengthen our loyalty and faithfulness to Christ, especially when faced with personal gain or convenience?

FAQ

Was Judas's betrayal predetermined by God, or was it a free choice?

The Bible presents a complex interplay of divine sovereignty and human free will in Judas's betrayal. While God's plan for salvation through Christ's sacrifice was certainly foreknown and prophesied (e.g., Acts 2:23), Judas's actions are consistently depicted as his own deliberate and culpable choices. Matthew 26:16 explicitly states "he sought opportunity to betray him," highlighting his active agency. Jesus Himself states that it would have been better for Judas "if he had not been born" (Matthew 26:24), implying moral responsibility. God's foreknowledge does not negate human culpability; rather, it demonstrates His ability to weave even sinful human choices into His perfect redemptive plan without condoning the sin itself.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Matthew 26:16, detailing Judas's active search for an opportunity to betray Jesus, finds its profound Christ-centered fulfillment not merely in the act of betrayal itself, but in the divine purpose it served. This calculated treachery, born of human sin and greed, was paradoxically the very means by which God's eternal plan of salvation would be accomplished. Jesus, the true Lamb of God, willingly submitted to this betrayal, knowing full well the suffering it entailed, in order to become the ultimate sacrifice for the sins of humanity. His foreknowledge of Judas's actions, as seen in John 13:21-30, demonstrates His sovereign control even over the darkest human deeds. The "opportunity" Judas sought was ultimately God's appointed time for His Son to be "delivered up" (Romans 8:32) for our justification, transforming an act of profound evil into the cornerstone of divine grace and redemption. Thus, Judas's betrayal, far from thwarting God's will, became an essential, albeit tragic, step in the unfolding of Christ's salvific mission, leading directly to the cross and the triumph over sin and death (Colossians 2:13-15).

Copy as
Copy as

Historical interpretation

Ten Centuries of Reception

13 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

13 quotes · AD 253–1274
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
2003004005006007008009001000110012001300

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

"From then on he sought an opportunity to betray him." Luke's Gospel shows most clearly the kind of opportunity for which Judas was looking when it says, "And he sought an opportunity to betray him in the absence of the crowds," that is, when the people were not with him but when he was alone with his disciples. His betrayer did the deed after supper, when Christ was alone in the garden of Gethsemane. For once Judas reached his agreement with the Jews, he determined that his opportunity would come when Jesus was not with the crowds. Notice how even today the betrayers of Jesus Christ, Word of truth and Word of God, see their best opportunity to hand him over at a time when Christians are being persecuted.… They are at their worst when the number of his faithful is at its fewest. And since there is a time for all things, for Solomon said "there is a time to be born and a time to die," the time for betraying the Word of truth was specifically when very few of the faithful were with Christ.
AD 253Origen of Alexandriaas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Ante-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
The opportunity which Judas sought is further explained by Luke, how he might betray him in the absence of the multitude; (Luke 22:6.) when the populace was not with Him, but He was withdrawn with His disciples. And this he did, delivering Him up after supper, when He was withdrawn to the garden of Gethsemane. And from that time forward, such has been the season sought for by those that would betray the word of God in time of persecution when the multitude of believers is not around the word of truth.
AD 367Hilary of Poitiersas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
In this woman is prefigured the people of the Gentiles, who gave glory to God in Christ's passion; for she anointed His head, but the head of Christ is God, and ointment is the fruit of good works. But the disciples, anxious for the salvation of Israel, say that this ought to have been sold for the use of the poor; designating by a prophetic instinct the Jews, who lacked faith, by the name of the poor. The Lord answers that there is abundant time in which they may show their care for the poor, but that salvation cannot be extended to the Gentiles but by obedience to His command, if, that is, by the pouring out of this woman's ointment they are buried together with Him, because regeneration can only be given to those who are dead in the profession of baptism. And this her work shall be told wherever this Gospel is preached, because when Israel draws back, the glory of the Gospel is preached by the belief of the Gentiles.
"Then went one of the twelve, he that was called Judas Iscariot, unto the chief priests, and said unto them, What will ye give me, and I will deliver Him unto you?" Then. When? When these things were spoken, when He had said, it is for my burial, and not even thereby was he moved to compunction, neither when he heard that the Gospel should be preached everywhere did he fear (and yet it was the language of unspeakable power), but when women showed so much honor, and women that had been harlots, then he wrought the devil's works.

But what can be the reason they mention his surname? Because there was also another Judas. And they do not shrink from saying, He was of the twelve; so entirely do they hide none of those things which seem to be matters of reproach. And yet they might have said merely this, that he was one of the disciples, for there were others besides. But now they add, of the twelve, as though they had said, of the first company of those selected as the best, of them with Peter and John. Because for one thing did they care, for truth alone, not for concealing what things were done.

For this cause many of the signs they pass by, but of the things that appear to be matters of reproach they conceal nothing; but though it be word, though it be deed, though it be what you will of this kind, they proclaim it with confidence.

And not these only, but even John himself, who utters the higher doctrines. For he most of all tells us of the affronts and the reproachful things that were done unto Him.

And see how great is the wickedness of Judas, in that he comes unto them of his own accord, in that he does this for money, and for such a sum of money.

But Luke saith, that he conferred with the chief captains. For after that the Jews became seditious, the Romans set over them those that should provide for their good order. For their government had now undergone a change according to the prophecy.

To these then he went and said, "What will ye give me, and I will deliver him unto you. And they covenanted with him for thirty pieces of silver. And from that time he sought opportunity to betray Him." For indeed he was afraid of the multitude, and desired to seize him alone.

Oh madness! how did covetousness altogether blind him! For he that had often seen Him when He went through the midst, and was not seized, and when He afforded many demonstrations of His Godhead and power, looked to lay hold on Him; and this while He was using like a charm for him so many, both awful and soothing words, to put an end to this evil thought. For not even at the supper did He forbear from this care of him, but unto the last day discoursed to him of these things. But he profited nothing. Yet not for that did the Lord cease to do His part. Knowing this, then, let us also not intermit to do all things unto them that sin and are remiss, warning, teaching, exhorting, admonishing, advising, though we profit nothing. For Christ indeed foreknew that the traitor was incorrigible, yet nevertheless He ceased not to supply what could be done by Himself, as well admonishing as threatening and bewailing over him, and nowhere plainly, nor openly, but in a concealed way. And at the very time of the betrayal, He allowed him even to kiss Him, but this benefited him nothing. So great an evil is covetousness, this made him both a traitor, and a sacrilegious robber.
AD 407John Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
Then, when, that is, he heard that this Gospel should be preached every where; for that made him afraid, as it was indeed a mark of unspeakable power.

One of the twelve, as much as to say, of that first band who are elected for preeminent merit1.
AD 420Jeromeas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
The wretched Judas would fain replace, by the sale of his Master, that loss which he supposed he had incurred by the ointment. And he does not demand any fixed sum, lest his treachery should see in a gainful thing, but as though delivering up a worthless slave, he left it to those who bought, to determine how much they would give.

JEROME.Joseph was not sold as many, following the LXX (Gen. 37:28.), think for twenty pieces of gold, but as the Hebrew text has for twenty pieces of silver, for it could not be that the servant should be more valuable than his Master.
AD 420JeromePost-NiceneSourceCommentary on Matthew
(Verse 16.) But they agreed to give him thirty pieces of silver. And from then on he was looking for an opportunity to betray him. Joseph was not sold for twenty gold pieces, as many think according to the Septuagint translators, but according to the Hebrew Truth, for twenty silver pieces; for no servant could be more precious than the Lord.
AD 430Augustine of Hippoas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(de Cons. Ev. ii. 78.) The order of the narrative is this. The Lord says, Ye know that after two days will be the feast of the Passover; ... then assembled together the Chief Priests and Scribes; ... then went one of the twelve. Thus the narrative of what took place at Bethany is inserted by way of digression, respecting an earlier time between that, Lest there be an uproar, and, Then one of the twelve.

(Quæst. Ev. i. 41) That the Lord was sold for thirty pieces of silver by Judas, denotes the unrighteous Jews, who pursuing things carnal and temporal, which belong to the five bodily senses, refuse to have Christ; and forasmuch as they did this in the sixth age of the world, their receiving five times six as the price of the Lord is thus signified; and because the Lord's words are silver, but they understood even the Law carnally, they had, as it were, stamped on silver the image of that worldly dominion which they held to when they renounced the Lord.
AD 461Leo the Greatas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Serm. 60.4.) He did not out of any fear forsake Christ, but through lust of money cast Him off; for in comparison of the love of money all our affections are feeble; the soul athirst for gain fears not to die for a very little; there is no trace of righteousness in that heart in which covetousness has once taken up its abode. The traitor Judas, intoxicated with this bane, in his thirst for lucre was so foolishly hardened, as to sell his Lord and Master.
AD 856Rabanus Maurusas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
Went, he says, because he was neither compelled, nor invited, but of his own free will formed the wicked design.
AD 1107Theophylact of OhridMedieval
When the woman who was a stranger and a harlot had shown Jesus such honor, then it was that His own disciple departed to betray Him. For it was not without meaning that the evangelist says, "Then went...," but in order to show the shamelessness of Judas. He adds the name "Iscariot" to better identify him. For there was another Judas who was also called Lebbaeus (Mt. 10:3 and Lk. 6:16). The betrayer, however, was from a certain village named Iscara. "They covenanted with him for thirty pieces of silver," that is, they agreed, they determined an amount to give, and not as many think, that they weighed out and paid the money. "He sought an opportunity" to betray Him to them when He was alone, for they feared the multitude, and for this reason they paid Judas to inform them when Jesus would be alone.
AD 1274Glossa Ordinariaas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(non occ.) Having described the occasion of his treachery, the Evangelist proceeds to recount the manner of it.

(non occ.) He adds his distinctive appellation, Scarioth, for there was another Judas.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Matthew 26:16 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8