Skip to content

Mark 2:19

“The Question of Fasting”Mark 2:18–22
King James Version
And Jesus said unto them, Can the children of the bridechamber fast, while the bridegroom is with them? as long as they have the bridegroom with them, they cannot fast.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
And G2532 Jesus G2424 said G2036 unto them G846,G3361 Can G1410 the children G5207 of the bridechamber G3567 fast G3522, while G1722 G3739 the bridegroom G3566 is G2076 with G3326 them G846? as long as G3745 G5550 they have G2192 the bridegroom G3566 with G3326 them G1438, they cannot G3756 G1410 fast G3522.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
Jesus replied, “How can the guests of the bridegroom fast while He is with them? As long as He is with them, they cannot fast.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
And Jesus said unto them, Can the sons of the bridechamber fast, while the bridegroom is with them? as long as they have the bridegroom with them, they cannot fast.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
Yeshua said to them, “Can the groomsmen fast while the bridegroom is with them? As long as they have the bridegroom with them, they can’t fast.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
And Iesus saide vnto them, Can the children of the marriage chamber fast, whiles the bridegrome is with them? as long as they haue the bridegrome with them, they cannot fast.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
And Jesus said to them, `Are the sons of the bride-chamber able, while the bridegroom is with them, to fast? so long time as they have the bridegroom with them they are not able to fast;

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
29 Greek words
  1. ΚαὶKaiAndG2532CONJConjunction
  2. εἶπενeipensaidG2036V-2AAI-3SVerb 2nd Aorist Active Indicative 3rd Singular
  3. αὐτοῖςautoisto themG846P-DPMPersonal pronoun Dative Plural Masculine
  4. ὁho[the]G3588T-NSMDefinite article Nominative Singular Masculine
  5. Ἰησοῦς·IēsousJesusG2424N-NSM-PNoun Nominative Singular Masculine Individual
  6. μὴmēNotG3361PRT-NNegative Particle Negative
  7. δύνανταιdunantaiare ableG1410V-PNI-3PVerb Present Middle Or Passive Deponent Indicative 3rd Plural
  8. οἱhoitheG3588T-NPMDefinite article Nominative Plural Masculine
  9. υἱοὶhuioisonsG5207N-NPMNoun Nominative Plural Masculine
  10. τοῦtouof theG3588T-GSMDefinite article Genitive Singular Masculine
  11. νυμφῶνοςnumphōnosbridechamberG3567N-GSMNoun Genitive Singular Masculine
  12. ἐνeninG1722PREPPreposition
  13. ᾧhōwhichG3739R-DSMRelative pronoun Dative Singular Masculine
  14. ὁhotheG3588T-NSMDefinite article Nominative Singular Masculine
  15. νυμφίοςnumphiosbridegroomG3566N-NSMNoun Nominative Singular Masculine
  16. μετ᾽met᾽withG3326PREPPreposition
  17. αὐτῶνautōnthemG846P-GPMPersonal pronoun Genitive Plural Masculine
  18. ἐστινestinisG1510V-PAI-3SVerb Present Active Indicative 3rd Singular
  19. νηστεύειν;nēsteueinto fast?G3522V-PANVerb Present Active Infinitive
  20. ὅσονhosonAs long asG3745K-ASMCorrelative pronoun Accusative Singular Masculine
  21. χρόνονchronontimeG5550N-ASMNoun Accusative Singular Masculine
  22. ἔχουσινechousinthey haveG2192V-PAI-3PVerb Present Active Indicative 3rd Plural
  23. τὸνtontheG3588T-ASMDefinite article Accusative Singular Masculine
  24. νυμφίονnumphionbridegroomG3566N-ASMNoun Accusative Singular Masculine
  25. μετ᾽met᾽withG3326PREPPreposition
  26. αὐτῶνautōnthemG846P-GPMPersonal pronoun Genitive Plural Masculine
  27. οὐounotG3756PRT-NNegative Particle Negative
  28. δύνανταιdunantaithey are ableG1410V-PNI-3PVerb Present Middle Or Passive Deponent Indicative 3rd Plural
  29. νηστεύεινnēsteueinto fastG3522V-PANVerb Present Active Infinitive
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
In the KJVVerse 24,280 of 31,102 · 78.1%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Jesus answers that a bridegroom’s companions feast while he is with them, and he is that Bridegroom, so his presence makes those days a time of joy.

“And Jesus said unto them,”

Jesus answers the questioners of verse 18 directly.

“Can the children of the bridechamber fast, while the bridegroom is with them?”

A question with an obvious answer. The bridegroom’s companions belong at the feast, and Jesus is the bridegroom.

“as long as they have the bridegroom with them, they cannot fast.”

The repeat puts the weight on “as long as”. His presence is the reason, and it lasts while he is there, which prepares for verse 20.

The Bridegroom and the New Wine

Mark 2:18–22

Summary

The disciples of John and the Pharisees kept regular fasts, and people came to Jesus to ask why his disciples did otherwise. He answered with a wedding. A bridegroom’s friends feast while he is with them, and Jesus is the Bridegroom, so his presence made those days a celebration. He added that the bridegroom would be taken away, and that then his disciples would fast. Then he drew on two things every household knew: a patch of unshrunk cloth tears an old garment, and new wine bursts old wineskins. What Jesus brings needs a new garment and new skins to hold it. In five verses we learn who Jesus is, why his coming is cause for joy, how fasting belongs to the days after the cross, and why the life he gives makes everything new.

Why Jesus was asked about fasting

This question comes in a run of disputes between Jesus and the religious leaders in Mark 2. He has forgiven and healed a paralysed man (Mark 2:1–12), called Levi the tax collector (Mark 2:13–14), and eaten with tax collectors and sinners at Levi’s house, which drew sharp criticism from the scribes and Pharisees (Mark 2:15–17). Now the challenge moves from the company his disciples kept to the fasts they kept, and the dispute about the Sabbath follows (Mark 2:23–28). Luke tells the same exchange in Luke 5:33–39.

Fasting was a deeply rooted and respected discipline in Israel. The Law of Moses commanded one fast for the whole nation, on the Day of Atonement, when the people were to “afflict your souls” (Leviticus 16:29). Devout Jews, the Pharisees above all, added fasts of their own. The Pharisee in Jesus’ parable says, “I fast twice in the week” (Luke 18:12), and the Pharisees are known to have fasted on Mondays and Thursdays. John the Baptist preached repentance in the wilderness to prepare the way for the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 3:1–2), and his disciples fasted in keeping with his stern, prophetic way of life. Fasting went with repentance, mourning, humility and earnest prayer, and it was widely taken as a sign of real devotion to God. A teacher whose disciples went on eating was bound to be asked why, and people would wonder about their commitment and about what he taught them.

The verb for fasting, nēsteúō, comes from nēstis and means to abstain from food for religious reasons, a deliberate act of self-denial. All three groups are called “disciples”, mathētḗs, a learner or pupil, from manthánō, “to learn”. The question sets the three groups of learners side by side, because a disciple’s habits show what his master teaches. “Why” is diatí, formed from diá and tís, and it is the plain word for “why?” or “wherefore?”. Mark leaves the askers unnamed, and they may have included Pharisees or their associates. They bring the question to Jesus himself, so it challenges his authority as well as his followers’ practice.

There is a quiet irony in the scene. People who were careful to fast as they waited for God’s promised salvation were questioning the Messiah himself, who stood in front of them.

Jesus is the Bridegroom

Jesus answers with a question anyone could answer: “Can the children of the bridechamber fast, while the bridegroom is with them?” A wedding in Israel was a time of great joy and feasting that often lasted a whole week, and fasting or mourning in the middle of it would have been out of place. The nymphíos is the bridegroom, and the nymphṓn is the bridal room. “Children” is huiós, “sons”, and in this phrase it means the groom’s close friends and attendants, the companions who took part in the feast and helped it along. While the bridegroom is with them, their place is at the feast, and Jesus says they “cannot fast” for as long as he is there. The obvious answer to his question becomes the answer to theirs. Matthew records the same words (Matthew 9:15).

In this picture Jesus is the bridegroom and his disciples are his companions. The Old Testament speaks of God as the husband of his people. Isaiah says, “as the bridegroom rejoiceth over the bride, so shall thy God rejoice over thee” (Isaiah 62:5), and through Hosea the LORD says, “I will betroth thee unto me for ever” (Hosea 2:19–20). When Jesus calls himself the bridegroom, he takes up that language of joy, closeness and covenant and claims for himself the place God holds in it. He is the Messiah his questioners were waiting for, and with him the long-awaited time of joy with God had come.

Some of the questioners were John’s disciples, and John himself had used this very picture of Jesus: “He that hath the bride is the bridegroom: but the friend of the bridegroom, which standeth and heareth him, rejoiceth greatly because of the bridegroom’s voice” (John 3:29). John counted himself the bridegroom’s friend and was glad to stand by him.

The picture reaches beyond the days of Jesus’ ministry. The New Testament calls the church Christ’s bride, whom he loved and for whom he gave himself (Ephesians 5:25–27), and it closes at a wedding: “Blessed are they which are called unto the marriage supper of the Lamb” (Revelation 19:7–9). The feasting of the disciples while Jesus was with them was a foretaste of that day.

When the bridegroom is taken away

“But the days will come, when the bridegroom shall be taken away from them, and then shall they fast in those days.” Here Jesus looks ahead, in veiled words, to his own going. The verb apaírō means to lift off or remove, and what happened later shows what this removal would be. He was seized and put to death, like the servant of whom Isaiah wrote, “he was cut off out of the land of the living” (Isaiah 53:7–8). After he rose, he was taken up into heaven before his disciples’ eyes (Acts 1:9–11), and from then on they lived apart from his bodily presence. They grasped what he meant only after it had happened.

“Those days” are the days of the church, the days we live in now. Christ is absent in body, and he has kept his promise to send the Comforter: “I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you” (John 14:16–18). So his people live with real joy in him, by his Spirit, and with longing for his return. Fasting belongs to that longing. It is a fitting way for us to mourn, to repent, to pray earnestly and to seek God’s will while we wait for the Bridegroom to come back for his bride.

Does Jesus do away with fasting?

Jesus gives fasting its proper time. While he was with his disciples it was out of place, and once he was taken from them, he says plainly, “then shall they fast”. He also teaches how to fast, in secret before the Father, with a washed face and an anointed head, so that the fast is seen by God alone (Matthew 6:16–18). Long before, God had told his people through Isaiah what fast he chooses, one joined to loosing the bonds of wickedness, feeding the hungry and taking in the poor (Isaiah 58:3–7). So fasting for us is an act of devotion that comes from a heart that wants God, kept in sorrow over sin and over the brokenness of the world, and in longing for Christ’s coming, and it goes hand in hand with the joy of what he has already done.

The patch and the wineskins

Every household in Israel knew how to mend clothes and how to store wine, and Jesus draws on both.

Garments were valuable and were mended to make them last. New cloth was fulled before use, a process that shrank and thickened it, and the word for “new” in verse 21, ágnaphos, means exactly that the cloth is unfulled and unshrunk. Sew such a patch onto an old garment and the first washing shrinks it. The garment is palaiós, old and worn, and its weakened fabric gives way under the pull. “The new piece that filled it up taketh away from the old”: the verb aírō means to lift up or take away, and here the shrinking patch tears a piece out of the garment. “The rent is made worse.” The rent is a schísma, a split or gap, the word that gives us “schism”, and the hole the patch was meant to close is now bigger than before. Matthew records the same picture (Matthew 9:16).

Wine was kept in skins made from the hides of goats or sheep, which the KJV calls “bottles”. New wine was still fermenting, and the gas it gave off stretched the skin. A new skin was supple and stretched with it. A skin that had been used before had already been stretched and had grown brittle and stiff, and new wine poured into it would burst it. The same word palaiós describes these old skins and the old garment of verse 21. The wine is néos, new in age, fresh and newly made. “Burst” is rhḗgnymi, to break or tear apart, the wreck that pressure from inside brings. Two things are lost at once, for “the wine is spilled, and the bottles will be marred.” So “new wine must be put into new bottles.”

What the new cloth and the new wine stand for

Both pictures answer the question about fasting. What Jesus brings is new, and it needs a new form to hold it. The new cloth and the new wine are the kingdom of God that came with him and the new covenant he came to make, with its grace, its forgiveness and its life in the Spirit. The old garment and the old wineskins are the old order of religious observance, the law’s ceremonies as they were kept in his day together with the traditions the Pharisees had built around them, of which their many fasts were part. The law was God’s gift, given for a time, and Paul calls it “our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ” (Galatians 3:24–25). In Jesus that order reached its goal. “For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ” (John 1:17), and “Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth” (Romans 10:4).

God had promised this. Through Jeremiah he promised a new covenant, in which he would write his law on his people’s hearts (Jeremiah 31:31–34). Hebrews calls it a better covenant and says that by calling it new God made the first one old (Hebrews 8:6–13). Christ’s one sacrifice perfects those who come to God through him (Hebrews 10:1–18), and by his death he opened “a new and living way” into God’s presence (Hebrews 10:19–20). At the Last Supper he said, “This cup is the new testament in my blood” (Luke 22:20). Paul says that we now “serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter” (Romans 7:6). The disputes around this passage show the same newness at work, as Jesus forgives sins on his own authority and calls himself Lord of the Sabbath.

Stitching what Christ brings onto the old order harms both, as the patch makes the rent worse and the burst skin loses the wine.

The new bottles are new hearts

The new bottles of verse 22 are the hearts God makes new to receive his Son. He promised, “A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you” (Ezekiel 36:26–27), and he keeps that promise in Christ: “if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new” (2 Corinthians 5:17). Raised with Christ, we “walk in newness of life” (Romans 6:4), and at the end of all things he who sits on the throne says, “Behold, I make all things new” (Revelation 21:5).

The same holds within each believer. The life Christ gives is meant to renew the whole person, and when it is added as a patch to old habits and an unchanged mind, the result is a worse tear, a divided life and a gospel misunderstood.

Joy in the Bridegroom, and longing for his return

These verses tell us that Jesus is the Bridegroom God promised, and that to be with him is joy, like a wedding feast. They tell us that he was taken away, to the cross and then to heaven, and that his people live in the days between his going and his coming again. And they tell us that what he brings is wholly new, a new covenant and a new life, held in hearts that God himself has made new. Paul speaks of “the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free” (Galatians 5:1), and Jesus says, “If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed” (John 8:36).

So the Christian life holds joy and longing together. We rejoice in the Bridegroom, who gave himself for us and is with us by his Spirit, and we fast and pray as people waiting for him. A day is coming when the fasting ends for good, at the marriage supper of the Lamb.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Mark 2:18–28. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 11 verses
Passage under commentMark 2:18–28
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Christ had been put to justify himself in conversing with publicans and sinners: here he is put to justify his disciples; and in what they do according to his will he will justify them, and bear them out.

I.He justifies them in their not fasting, which was turned to their reproach by the Pharisees.

Why do the Pharisees and the disciples of John fast? They used to fast, the Pharisees fasted twice in the week (Luke 18:12), and probably the disciples of John did so too; and, it should seem, this very day, when Christ and his disciples were feasting in Levi's house, was their fast-day, for the word is nēsteuousi - they do fast, or are fasting, which aggravated the offence. Thus apt are strict professors to make their own practice a standard, and to censure and condemn all that do not fully come up to it. They invidiously suggest that if Christ went among sinners to do them good, as he had pleaded, yet the disciples went to indulge their appetites, for they never knew what it was to fast, or to deny themselves. Note, Ill-will always suspects the worst.

Two things Christ pleads in excuse of his disciples not fasting.

1.That these were easy days with them, and fasting was not so seasonable now as it would be hereafter, Mark 2:19, Mark 2:20. There is a time for all things. Those that enter into the married state, must expect care and trouble in the flesh, and yet, during the nuptial solemnity, they are merry, and think it becomes them to be so; it was very absurd for Samson's bride to weep before him, during the days that the feast lasted, Judges 14:17. Christ and his disciples were but newly married, the bridegroom was yet with them, the nuptials were yet in the celebrating (Matthew's particularly); when the bridegroom should be removed from them to the far country, about his business, then would be a proper time to sit as a widow, in solitude and fasting.

2.That these were early days with them, and they were not so able for the severe exercises of religion as hereafter they would be. The Pharisees had long accustomed themselves to such austerities; and John Baptist himself came neither eating nor drinking. His disciples from the first inured themselves to hardships, and thus found it easier to bear strict and frequent fasting, but it was not so with Christ's disciples; their Master came eating and drinking, and had not bred them up to the difficult services of religion as yet, for it was all in good time. To put them upon such frequent fasting at first, would be a discouragement to them, and perhaps drive them off from following Christ; it would be of as ill consequence as putting new wine into old casks, or sewing new cloth to that which is worn thin and threadbare, Mark 2:21, Mark 2:22. Note, God graciously considers the frame of young Christians, that are weak and tender, and so must we; nor must we expect more than the work of the day in its day, and that day according to the strength, because it is not in our hands to give strength according to the day. Many contract an antipathy to some kind of food, otherwise good, by being surfeited with it when they are young; so, many entertain prejudices against the exercises of devotion by being burthened with them, and made to serve with an offering, at their setting out. Weak Christians must take heed of over-tasking themselves, and of making the yoke of Christ otherwise than as it is, easy, and sweet, and pleasant.

II.He justifies them in plucking the ears of corn on the sabbath day, which, I will warrant you, a disciples of the Pharisees would not dare to have done; for it was contrary to an express tradition of their elders. In this instance, as in that before, they reflect upon the discipline of Christ's school, as if it were not so strict as that of theirs: so common it is for those who deny the power of godliness, to be jealous for the form, and censorious of those who affect not their form.

Observe, 1. What a poor breakfast Christ's disciples had on a sabbath-day morning, when they were going to church (Mark 2:23); they plucked the ears of corn, and that was the best they had. They were so intent upon spiritual dainties, that they forgot even their necessary food; and the word of Christ was to them instead of that; and their zeal for it even ate them up. The Jews made it a piece of religion, to eat dainty food on sabbath days, but the disciples were content with any thing.

2.How even this was grudged them by the Pharisees, upon supposition that it was not lawful to pluck the ears of corn on the sabbath day, that that was as much a servile work as reaping (Mark 2:24); Why do they on the sabbath day that which is not lawful? Note, If Christ's disciples do that which is unlawful, Christ will be reflected upon, and upbraided with it, as he was here, and dishonour will redound to his name. It is observable, that when the Pharisees thought Christ did amiss, they told the disciples (Mark 2:16); and now when they thought the disciples did amiss, they spoke to Christ, as make-bates, that did what they could to sow discord between Christ and his disciples, and make a breach in the family.

3.How Christ defended them in what they did.

(1.)By example. They had a good precedent for it in David's eating the show-bread, when he was hungry, and there was no other bread to be had (Mark 2:25, Mark 2:26); Have ye never read? Note, Many of our mistakes would be rectified, and our unjust censures of others corrected, if we would but recollect what we have read in the scripture; appeals to that are most convincing. "You have read that David, the man after God's own heart, when he was hungry, made no difficulty of eating the show-bread, which by the law none might eat of but the priests and their families." Note, Ritual observances must give way to moral obligations; and that may be done in a case of necessity, which otherwise may not be done. This, it is said, David did in the days of Abiathar the High-Priest; or just before the days of Abiathar, who immediately succeeded Abimelech his father in the pontificate, and, it is probable, was at that time his father's deputy, or assistant, in the office; and he it was that escaped the massacre, and brought the ephod to David.

(2.)By argument. To reconcile them to the disciples' plucking the ears of corn, let them consider,

[1.]Whom the sabbath was made for (Mark 2:27); it was made for man, and not man for the sabbath. This we had not in Matthew. The sabbath is a sacred and divine institution; but we must receive and embrace it as a privilege and a benefit, not as a task and a drudgery. First, God never designed it to be an imposition upon us, and therefore we must not make it so to ourselves. Man was not made for the sabbath, for he was made a day before the sabbath was instituted. Man was made for God, and for his honour and service, and he just rather die than deny him; but he was not made for the sabbath, so as to be tied up by the law of it, from that which is necessary to the support of his life. Secondly, God did design it to be an advantage to us, and so we must make it, and improve it. He made if for man. 1. He had some regard to our bodies in the institution, that they might rest, and not be tired out with the constant business of this world (Deuteronomy 5:14); that thy man-servant and thy maid-servant may rest. Now he that intended the sabbath-rest for the repose of our bodies, certainly never intended it should restrain us, in a case of necessity, from fetching in the necessary supports of the body; it must be construed so as not to contradict itself - for edification, and not for destruction. 2. He had much more regard to our souls. The sabbath was made a day of rest, only in order to its being a day of holy work, a day of communion with God, a day of praise and thanksgiving; and the rest from worldly business is therefore necessary, that we may closely apply ourselves to this work, and spend the whole time in it, in public and in private; but then time is allowed us for that which is necessary to the fitting of our bodies for the service of our souls in God's service, and the enabling of them to keep pace with them in that work. See here, (1.) What a good Master we serve, all whose institutions are for our own benefit, and if we be so wise as to observe them, we are wise for ourselves; it is not he, but we, that are gainers by our service. (2.) What we should aim at in our sabbath work, even the good of our own souls. If the sabbath was made for man, we should then ask ourselves at night, "What am I the better for this sabbath day?" (3.) What care we ought to take not to make those exercises of religion burthens to ourselves or others, which God ordained to be blessings; neither adding to the command by unreasonable strictness, nor indulging those corruptions which are adverse to the command, for thereby we make those devout exercises a penance to ourselves, which otherwise would be a pleasure.

[2.]Whom the sabbath was made by (Mark 2:28); "The Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath; and therefore he will not see the kind intentions of the institution of it frustrated by your impositions." Note, The sabbath days are days of the Son of man; he is the Lord of the day, and to his honour it must be observed; by him God made the worlds, and so it was by him that the sabbath was first instituted; by him God gave the law at mount Sinai, and so the fourth commandment was his law; and that little alteration that was shortly to be made, by the shifting of it one day forward to the first day of the week, was to be in remembrance of his resurrection, and therefore the Christian sabbath was to be called the Lord's day (Revelation 1:10), the Lord Christ's day; and the Son of man, Christ, as Mediator, is always to be looked upon as Lord of the sabbath. This argument he largely insists upon in his own justification, when he was charged with having broken the sabbath, John 5:16.

Historical interpretation

Eight Centuries of Reception

10 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

10 quotes · AD 390–1150
Post-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
40050060070080090010001100

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

Pseudo-BasilSourceCOMMENTARY ON THE PROPHET ISAIAH
True death is not a result of hunger for bread nor a result of thirst for this tangible water, but as a result of a hunger for hearing the word of the Lord. True death arises in the souls of those who do not hear. For one does “not live by bread alone, but by every word coming out through the mouth of God.” This is why … the attendants of the bridegroom cannot fast as long as the bridegroom is with them.
d. AD 390Gregory of NazianzusPost-NiceneSourceORATION 30, ON THE SON 10
Can the children of the bridechamber fast while the bridegroom is present? Why should they keep a bodily fast who are effectively cleansed by the Word, who came in bodily form as visible Word? The time of his sojourning among us was not one of mourning, but gladness.
d. AD 390Palladius of AntiochPost-Nicene
It is better to drink wine in moderation than to drink water in excess. Some who are holy drink wine in moderation. Some who squander water immoderately may be depraved and pleasureloving. So it appears to me. Do not therefore ascribe blame or praise to the eating of food as such, or to the drinking of wine, but rather to those who make proper or improper use of food and drink. Recall Joseph who in patriarchal times drank wine with the Egyptians and was in no way injured in his judgment, having taken heed to the admonitions of his conscience. But then compare the sorrier examples of Pythagoras, Diogenes and Plato, and with them also the Manichaeans, and other sects of philosophers, who did not heed these admonitions. Some of them came to such a pitch of sensuality or pride that they even forgot the God of the universe and worshiped lifeless images. So the blessed Apostle Peter and those who were with him did not hesitate to receive wine and make use of it. It was just because of this that our Lord’s detractors actively reproached the redeemer of all and their teacher, and made complaints against him, saying, “Why do not your disciples fast like John?” Lausiac History.
d. AD 420Palladius of GalatiaPost-NiceneSourceLAUSIAC HISTORY
It is better to drink wine in moderation than to drink water in excess. Some who are holy drink wine in moderation. Some who squander water immoderately may be depraved and pleasure-loving. So it appears to me. Do not therefore ascribe blame or praise to the eating of food as such, or to the drinking of wine, but rather to those who make proper or improper use of food and drink. Recall Joseph who in patriarchal times drank wine with the Egyptians and was in no way injured in his judgment, having taken heed to the admonitions of his conscience. But then compare the sorrier examples of Pythagoras, Diogenes and Plato, and with them also the Manichaeans, and other sects of philosophers, who did not heed these admonitions. Some of them came to such a pitch of sensuality or pride that they even forgot the God of the universe and worshiped lifeless images. So the blessed Apostle Peter and those who were with him did not hesitate to receive wine and make use of it. It was just because of this that our Lord’s detractors actively reproached the redeemer of all and their teacher, and made complaints against him, saying, “Why do not your disciples fast like John?”
d. AD 430Augustine of Hippoas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(de Con. Evan. ii. 27) But it may be thought that He added Pharisees, because they joined with the disciples of John in saying this to the Lord, whilst Matthew relates that the disciples of John alone said it: but the words which follow rather show that those who said it spoke not of themselves, but of others. For it goes on, And they come and say unto him, Why do the disciples, &c. For these words show, that the guests who were there came to Jesus, and had said this same thing to the disciples, so that in the words which he uses, they came, he speaks not of those same persons, of whom he had said, And the disciples of John and the Pharisees were fasting. But as they were fasting, those persons who remembered it, come to him. Matthew then says this, And there came to him the disciples of John, saying, because the Apostles also were there, and all eagerly, as each could, objected these things.

(ubi sup.) Mark here calls them children of the nuptials, whom Matthew calls children of the bridegroom; for we understand the children of the nuptials to be not only those of the bridegroom, but also of the bride.
AD 500Pseudo-Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.) He then calls Himself a bridegroom, as if about to be betrothed to the Church. For the betrothal is giving an earnest, namely, that of the grace of the Holy Ghost, by which the world believed.

(Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.) But intercourse with Him, He says, is far removed from all sorrow, when He adds, As long as they have the bridegroom with them, they cannot fast. He is sad, from whom some good is far removed; but he who has it present with him rejoices, and is not sad. But that He might destroy their elation of heart, and show that He intended not His own disciples to be licentious, He adds, But the days will come when the bridegroom shall be taken, &c. as if He said, The time will come, when they will show their firmness; for when the Bridegroom shall be taken from them, they will fast as longing for His coming, and in order to unite to Him their spirits, cleansed by bodily suffering. He shows also that there is no necessity for His disciples to fast, as having present with them the Bridegroom of human nature, Who every where executes the words of God, and Who gives the seed of life. The sons of the Bridegroom also cannot, because they are infants, be entirely conformed to their Father, the Bridegroom, Who, considering their infancy, deigns to allow them not to fast: but when the Bridegroom is gone, they will fast, through desire of Him; when they have been made perfect, they will be united to the Bridegroom in marriage, and will always feast at the king's banquet.

(Vict. Ant. e Cat in Marc.) As if He said, because these are preachers of the New Testament, it is not possible that they should serve old laws; but ye who follow old customs, fitly observe the fasts of Moses. But for these, who are about to hand down to men new and wonderful observances, it is not necessary to observe the old traditions, but to be virtuous in mind; some time or other however they will observe fasting with other virtues. But this fasting is different from the fasting of the law, for that was one of restraint, this of goodwill; on account of the fervour of the Spirit, Whom they cannot yet receive. Wherefore it goes on, And no one putteth new wine into old bottles: else the new wine doth burst the bottles, and the wine is spilled, and the bottles will be marred: but new wine must be put in new bottles.
d. AD 735Bedeas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
But John did not drink wine and strong drink, because he who has no power by nature, obtains more merit by abstinence. But why should the Lord, to whom it naturally belonged to forgive sins, shun those whom he could make more pure, than those who fast? But Christ also fasted, lest He should break the precept, He ate with sinners, that thou mightest see His grace, and acknowledge His power. It goes on; And Jesus said unto them, Can the children, &c.

(ubi sup.) But in a mystical sense, it may thus be expressed; that the disciples of John and the Pharisees fast, because every man who boasts of the works of the law without faith, who follows the traditions of men, and receives the preaching of Christ with his bodily ear, and not by the faith of the heart, keeps aloof from spiritual goods, and wastes away with a fasting soul. But he who is incorporated into the members of Christ by a faithful love cannot fast, because he feasts upon His Body and Blood. It goes on, No one seweth a piece of rough, that is, new, cloth on an old garment: else the new piece that filleth it up taketh away from the old, and the rent is made worse.

(ubi sup.) For He compares His disciples to old bottles, who would burst at spiritual precepts, rather than be held in restraint by them. But they will be new bottles, when after the ascension of the Lord, they are renewed by desiring His consolation, and then new wine will come to the new bottles, that is, the fervour of the Holy Ghost will fill the hearts of spiritual men. A teacher must also take heed not to commit the hidden things of new mysteries to a soul, hardened in old wickedness.

(ubi sup.) Neither was it fitting to sew on a, new piece; that is, a portion of doctrine which teaches a general fast from all the joy of temporal delights; for if this be done, the teaching is rent, and agrees not with the old part. But by a new garment is intended good works, which are done externally, and by the new wine, is expressed the fervour of faith, hope, and charity, by which we are reformed in our minds.
d. AD 735BedeEarly MedievalSourceHomilies on the Gospels 1.14
From the time that the incarnation of our Savior was first promised to the patriarchs, it was always awaited by many upright souls with tears and mourning—until he came. From that time when, after his resurrection, he ascended to heaven, all the hope of the saints hangs upon his return. It was at the time when he was keeping company with humanity that his presence was to be celebrated. Then it would have been unfitting to weep and mourn. For like the bride, she had him with her bodily whom she loved spiritually. Therefore the bridegroom is Christ, the bride is the church, and the friends of the bridegroom and of the marriage are each and every one of his faithful companions. The time of his marriage is that time when, through the mystery of the incarnation, he is joining the holy church to himself. Thus it was not by chance, but for the sake of a certain mystical meaning that he came to a marriage ceremony on earth in the customary fleshly way, since he descended from heaven to earth in order to wed the church to himself in spiritual love. His nuptial chamber was the womb of his virgin mother. There God was conjoined with human nature. From there he came forth like a bridegroom to join the church to himself.
d. AD 1107Theophylact of Ohridas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
For the disciples of John being in an imperfect state, continued in Jewish customs.

He also calls Himself a bridegroom, not only as betrothing to Himself virgin minds, but because the time of His first coming is not a time of sorrow, nor of sadness to believers, neither does it bring with it toil, but rest. For it is without any works of the law, giving rest by baptism, by which we easily obtain salvation without toil. But the sons of the nuptials or of the Bridegroom are the Apostles; because they, by the grace of God, are made worthy of every heavenly blessing, by the grace of God, and partakers of every joy.

We must also understand, that every man whose works are good is the son of the Bridegroom; he has the Bridegroom with him, even Christ, and fasts not, that is, does no works of repentance, because he does not sin: but when the Bridegroom is taken away by the man's falling into sin, then he fasts and is penitent, that he may cure his sin.

Or else the disciples are likened to old garments on account of the infirmity of their minds, on which it was not fitting to impose the heavy command of fasting.
AD 1150Glossa Ordinariaas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(non occ.) As above, the Master was accused to the disciples for keeping company with sinners in their feasts, so now, on the other hand, the disciples are complained of to the Master for their omission of fasts, that so matter for dissension might arise amongst them. Wherefore it is said, And the disciples of John and the Pharisees used to fast.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Mark 2:19 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8