Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the scribes and the Pharisees began to reason, saying, Who is this which speaketh blasphemies? Who can forgive sins, but God alone?
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And G2532 the scribes G1122 and G2532 the Pharisees G5330 began G756 to reason G1260, saying G3004, Who G5101 is G2076 this G3778 which G3739 speaketh G2980 blasphemies G988? Who G5101 can G1410 forgive G863 sins G266, but G1508 God G2316 alone G3441?
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The Torah-teachers and the P'rushim began thinking, "Who is this fellow that speaks such blasphemies? Who can forgive sin except God?"
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
But the scribes and Pharisees began thinking to themselves, “Who is this man who speaks blasphemy? Who can forgive sins but God alone?”
Ask
American Standard Version
And the scribes and the Pharisees began to reason, saying, Who is this that speaketh blasphemies? Who can forgive sins, but God alone?
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The scribes and the Pharisees began to reason, saying, “Who is this that speaks blasphemies? Who can forgive sins, but God alone?”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then the Scribes and the Pharises began to reason, saying, Who is this that speaketh blasphemies? who can forgiue sinnes, but God onely?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And the scribes and the Pharisees began to reason, saying, `Who is this that doth speak evil words? who is able to forgive sins, except God only?'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem)
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Levant)
All Luke Sites (Levant) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 25,129 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Luke 5:21 records the indignant reaction of the scribes and Pharisees to Jesus' declaration of forgiveness for a paralyzed man. Their internal reasoning and subsequent question expose the core theological conflict: they correctly assert that only God possesses the authority to forgive sins, thereby implicitly accusing Jesus of blasphemy for claiming a divine prerogative. This pivotal moment underscores the growing tension between Jesus' messianic claims and the rigid understanding of the religious establishment, setting the stage for deeper theological confrontations.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is immediately preceded by Jesus' encounter with a paralyzed man, whose friends demonstrate extraordinary faith by lowering him through a roof to reach Jesus (Luke 5:18-19). Rather than immediately healing his physical ailment, Jesus' first words to the man are, "Man, thy sins are forgiven thee" (Luke 5:20). This unexpected declaration directly challenges the expectations of the crowd and, more critically, the religious leaders present. Luke explicitly states that "the power of the Lord was present to heal them" (Luke 5:17), setting up the expectation of physical healing, yet Jesus prioritizes spiritual healing, provoking the scribes and Pharisees' theological objection. The subsequent healing of the man (Luke 5:24-25) serves as empirical proof of Jesus' authority to forgive sins, directly addressing their challenge.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The "scribes" (γραμματεῖς, grammateús) were highly educated Jewish scholars, experts in the Mosaic Law, responsible for copying, interpreting, and teaching it. The "Pharisees" (Φαρισαῖοι, Pharisaîos) were a prominent Jewish religious sect known for their strict adherence to the Law, both written and oral traditions, and their emphasis on ritual purity. Both groups held significant religious and social authority among the people. In Jewish theology, derived from the Old Testament, the forgiveness of sins was an exclusive prerogative of God (e.g., Psalm 103:3). To claim the ability to forgive sins was, from their perspective, to usurp divine authority, an act considered blasphemous and punishable by death under Mosaic Law (Leviticus 24:16). Their reaction in Luke 5:21 is thus rooted in their deeply held monotheistic convictions and their understanding of God's unique sovereignty.
  • Key Themes: Luke 5:21 powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in Luke's Gospel and the broader New Testament. Firstly, it highlights Jesus' Divine Authority and Identity. By claiming the power to forgive sins, Jesus implicitly, yet unequivocally, asserts a divine prerogative, directly challenging the religious leaders' understanding of who He is. This is a profound claim to deity, setting Him apart from mere prophets or teachers. Secondly, the verse underscores the Nature of Sin and Forgiveness. It reveals that sin is fundamentally an offense against God, requiring divine intervention for its remission, a truth the scribes and Pharisees correctly understood. Jesus' act demonstrates that He possesses the necessary authority to deal with humanity's deepest spiritual need. Thirdly, it marks an escalation in the Conflict with Religious Authority. This incident is one of the earliest and clearest instances of direct opposition from the Jewish religious establishment, who perceive Jesus' actions as a threat to their theological framework and authority. This conflict will intensify throughout Jesus' ministry, culminating in His crucifixion. Finally, the charge of Blasphemy introduced here becomes a recurring accusation against Jesus, particularly at His trial (Matthew 26:65).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • reason (Greek, dialogízomai', G1260): This verb (G1260) means "to reckon thoroughly," implying a process of deliberation, discussion, or inward reflection. It suggests that the scribes and Pharisees were not merely surprised, but were actively processing and judging Jesus' statement according to their theological framework. Their "reasoning" was a calculated assessment leading to a definitive conclusion about Jesus' actions.
  • blasphemies (Greek, blasphēmía', G988): This noun (G988) refers to "vilification," especially against God. In this context, it signifies impious or irreverent speech that claims attributes or powers belonging exclusively to God. The scribes and Pharisees understood Jesus' claim to forgive sins as a direct affront to God's unique sovereignty, thus constituting blasphemy, a capital offense under Jewish law.
  • forgive (Greek, aphíēmi', G863): This verb (G863) means "to send forth," "to let go," or "to remit." In the context of sins, it means to pardon, to release from guilt, or to remit a debt. It highlights the divine action of removing the burden and penalty of sin. The religious leaders correctly identified this as an action only God could perform, making Jesus' act a direct challenge to their understanding of divine authority.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the scribes and the Pharisees began to reason": This clause identifies the key antagonists and their immediate reaction. The "scribes" and "Pharisees" represent the religious establishment, guardians of the Law. Their "reasoning" was not an open inquiry but an internal, critical deliberation, a judgment based on their theological presuppositions. They were not seeking understanding but evaluating Jesus' words against their rigid framework.
  • "saying, Who is this which speaketh blasphemies?": This rhetorical question expresses their indignant accusation. They perceive Jesus' claim to forgive sins as an audacious and impious utterance, a direct assault on God's honor and unique prerogative. The question "Who is this?" conveys contempt and disbelief, implying that Jesus, a mere man, has no right to make such a profound divine claim.
  • "Who can forgive sins, but God alone?": This is the theological premise upon which their charge of blasphemy rests. It is a statement of absolute truth, deeply rooted in Old Testament theology: only the sovereign God has the authority and power to remit sins. Their error was not in this theological axiom itself, but in their failure to recognize that the one standing before them, Jesus, was indeed God incarnate, uniquely possessing this divine power.

Literary Devices

Luke employs several Literary Devices in this verse to heighten the drama and theological significance. The use of a Rhetorical Question ("Who is this which speaketh blasphemies? Who can forgive sins, but God alone?") is prominent. These are not genuine inquiries seeking information, but rather emphatic statements designed to assert the scribes' and Pharisees' theological position and condemn Jesus. Furthermore, the passage is rich in Dramatic Irony. The religious leaders correctly state a profound theological truth—that only God can forgive sins—yet they are tragically blind to the fact that the very God they speak of is standing before them in human form, exercising that divine prerogative. Their accurate theological premise leads them to a fundamentally flawed conclusion about Jesus' identity. This creates a powerful sense of irony for the reader who understands Jesus' true nature. The verse also exemplifies Conflict/Antagonism, establishing a clear opposition between Jesus and the religious authorities, a theme that will dominate much of Luke's narrative.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Luke 5:21 serves as a foundational text for understanding Jesus' divine identity and the nature of salvation. The scribes and Pharisees' question, "Who can forgive sins, but God alone?" is theologically sound, reflecting a core truth of Old Testament monotheism. Their error was not in their understanding of God's exclusive prerogative, but in their inability to recognize that Jesus, standing before them, was God incarnate, uniquely qualified to exercise this divine authority. Jesus' claim to forgive sins is thus a direct assertion of His deity, a claim that He substantiates by subsequently performing a miracle that only God could enable. This incident highlights that sin is not merely a moral failing but a transgression against God, requiring a divine act of remission, which Jesus, as God, is uniquely able to provide.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Luke 5:21 compels us to confront the same question the scribes and Pharisees posed: "Who is this?" Our answer to this question profoundly shapes our understanding of salvation, authority, and the very nature of God. If Jesus is merely a good teacher or prophet, His claim to forgive sins is indeed blasphemous. But if He is, as the New Testament proclaims, God incarnate, then His authority to forgive is not only legitimate but essential for our redemption. This verse challenges us to move beyond superficial assessments of Jesus and to grapple with the radical implications of His divine claims. It reminds us that our deepest need is not merely physical healing, but spiritual forgiveness, a divine act that only Jesus can accomplish. It calls us to examine our own hearts: do we, like the scribes and Pharisees, allow our preconceived notions or traditions to blind us to the full truth of who Jesus is and what He offers?

Questions for Reflection

  • What does Jesus' prioritization of forgiving sins over physical healing reveal about His understanding of humanity's greatest need?
  • How does the scribes' and Pharisees' accurate theological premise ("only God can forgive sins") lead them to a flawed conclusion about Jesus? What lessons can we learn from their error?
  • In what ways might we, like the religious leaders, allow our own assumptions or traditions to prevent us from fully embracing who Jesus is and the radical nature of His claims?
  • If only God can forgive sins, and Jesus forgave sins, what does this imply about Jesus' identity, and how does this truth impact your personal faith?

FAQ

Why was forgiving sins considered blasphemy by the scribes and Pharisees?

Answer: In Jewish theology, derived from the Old Testament, the forgiveness of sins was understood to be an exclusive prerogative of God. Sin was seen as an offense against God's holiness and law, and therefore, only God had the authority to remit that offense. For a human being to claim the power to forgive sins was considered a usurpation of divine authority, an act of speaking impiously or irreverently against God, which is the definition of blasphemy. Such an act was punishable by death under Mosaic Law (Leviticus 24:16). The scribes and Pharisees, with their deep reverence for God's sovereignty, saw Jesus' declaration in Luke 5:20 as a direct challenge to this fundamental theological truth.

Did the scribes and Pharisees truly understand Jesus' identity?

Answer: No, they did not. While they correctly understood the theological principle that only God can forgive sins, they failed to recognize that Jesus was indeed God incarnate. Their understanding of the Messiah did not include a figure who would claim divine prerogatives in such a direct manner. They saw Jesus as a man from Nazareth, and therefore, His claims to forgive sins were, to them, utterly audacious and sacrilegious. Their spiritual blindness prevented them from seeing the divine power at work in Jesus, even when He subsequently performed a physical miracle as proof of His authority to forgive (Luke 5:24-25).

What is the significance of Jesus forgiving sins before healing the paralyzed man?

Answer: Jesus' decision to forgive the man's sins before healing his physical paralysis (Luke 5:20) is highly significant. Firstly, it reveals Jesus' priorities: He addresses the man's deepest spiritual need (forgiveness of sin) before his physical ailment. This highlights that sin is the root problem of humanity, leading to spiritual death, and that physical suffering can sometimes be a consequence of sin (John 9:2-3). Secondly, it serves as a direct challenge to the religious leaders, forcing them to confront His divine authority. Physical healing, while miraculous, could be attributed to a prophet. But forgiving sins was an act only God could perform. By making this claim, Jesus deliberately provoked their theological objection, setting the stage to prove His divine authority by then performing the visible, undeniable miracle of physical healing (Luke 5:24-25). He demonstrated that He had the authority to do the "unseen" (forgive sins) by doing the "seen" (physical healing).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Luke 5:21 is a profound Christ-centered moment, revealing Jesus' identity as the Lord of Glory, who alone possesses the ultimate authority over sin. The scribes and Pharisees correctly declared that "Who can forgive sins, but God alone?" Their statement, though intended as an accusation, inadvertently becomes a theological truth that points directly to Christ's divine nature. Jesus' willingness and ability to forgive the paralytic's sins is a pre-crucifixion demonstration of His deity, foreshadowing the ultimate act of atonement on the cross. It is through His sacrificial death and resurrection that Jesus fully exercises this divine prerogative, offering complete forgiveness and reconciliation to all who believe. He is the "Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world" (John 1:29). The New Testament consistently affirms that "in him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins" (Colossians 1:14). Thus, Luke 5:21 is not merely a historical account of a conflict, but a powerful testament to Jesus' unique status as the only one who can truly forgive sins because He is God, who bore the penalty for those sins, making Him the sole source of eternal redemption (Hebrews 9:22).

Copy as

Commentary on Luke 5 verses 17–26

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Here is, I. A general account of Christ's preaching and miracles, Luk 5:17. 1. He was teaching on a certain day, not on the sabbath day, then he would have said so, but on a week-day; six days shalt thou labour, not only for the world, but for the soul, and the welfare of that. Preaching and hearing the word of God are good works, if they be done well, any day in the week, as well as on sabbath days. It was not in the synagogue, but in a private house; for even there where we ordinarily converse with our friends it is not improper to give and receive good instruction. 2. There he taught, he healed (as before, Luk 5:15): And the power of the Lord was to heal them - ēn eis to iasthai autous. It was mighty to heal them; it was exerted and put forth to heal them, to heal those whom he taught (we may understand it so), to heal their souls, to cure them of their spiritual diseases, and to give them a new life, a new nature. Note, Those who receive the word of Christ in faith will find a divine power going along with that word, to heal them; for Christ came with his comforts to heal the broken-hearted, Luk 4:18. The power of the Lord is present with the word, present to those that pray for it and submit to it, present to heal them. Or it may be meant (and so it is generally taken) of the healing of those who were diseased in body, who came to him for cures. Whenever there was occasion, Christ had not to seek for his power, it was present to heal. 3. There were some grandees present in this assembly, and, as it should seem, more than usual: There were Pharisees, and doctors of the law, sitting by; not sitting at his feet, to learn of him; then I should have been willing to take the following clause as referring to those who are spoken of immediately before (the power of the Lord was present to heal them); and why might not the word of Christ reach their hearts? But, by what follows (Luk 4:21), it appears that they were not healed, but cavilled at Christ, which compels us to refer this to others, not to them; for they sat by as persons unconcerned, as if the word of Christ were nothing to them. They sat by as spectators, censors, and spies, to pick up something on which to ground a reproach or accusation. How many are there in the midst of our assemblies, where the gospel is preached, that do not sit under the word, but sit by! It is to them as a tale that is told them, not as a message that is sent them; they are willing that we should preach before them, not that we should preach to them. These Pharisees and scribes (or doctors of the law) came out of every town of Galilee, and Judea, and Jerusalem; they came from all parts of the nation. Probably, they appointed to meet at this time and place, to see what remarks they could make upon Christ and what he said and did. They were in a confederacy, as those that said, Come, and let us devise devices against Jeremiah, and agree to smite him with the tongue, Jer 18:18. Report, and we will report it, Jer 20:10. Observe, Christ went on with his work of preaching and healing, though he saw these Pharisees, and doctors of the Jewish church, sitting by, who, he knew, despised him, and watched to ensnare him.

II. A particular account of the cure of the man sick of the palsy, which was related much as it is here by both the foregoing evangelists: let us therefore only observe in short,

1.The doctrines that are taught us and confirmed to us by the story of this cure. (1.) That sin is the fountain of all sickness, and the forgiveness of sin is the only foundation upon which a recovery from sickness can comfortably be built. They presented the sick man to Christ, and he said, "Man, thy sins are forgiven thee (Luk 5:20), that is the blessing thou art most to prize and seek; for if thy sins be forgiven thee, though the sickness be continued, it is in mercy; if they be not, though the sickness be removed, it is in wrath." The cords of our iniquity are the bands of our affliction. (2.) That Jesus Christ has power on earth to forgive sins, and his healing diseases was an incontestable proof of it. This was the thing intended to be proved (Luk 5:24): That ye may know and believe that the Son of man, though now upon earth in his state of humiliation, hath power to forgive sins, and to release sinners, upon gospel terms, from the eternal punishment of sin, he saith to the sick of the palsy, Arise, and walk; and he is cured immediately. Christ claims one of the prerogatives of the King of kings when he undertakes to forgive sin, and it is justly expected that he should produce a good proof of it. "Well," saith he, "I will put it upon this issue: here is a man struck with a palsy, and for his sin; if I do not with a word's speaking cure his disease in an instant, which cannot be done by nature or art, but purely by the immediate power and efficacy of the God of nature, then say that I am not entitled to the prerogative of forgiving sin, am not the Messiah, am not the Son of God and King of Israel: but, if I do, you must own that I have power to forgive sins." Thus it was put upon a fair trial, and one word of Christ determined it. He did but say, Arise, take up thy couch, and that chronical disease had an instantaneous cure; immediately he arose before them. They must all own that there could be no cheat or fallacy in it. They that brought him could attest how perfectly lame he was before; they that saw him could attest how perfectly well he was now, insomuch that he had strength enough to take up and carry away the bed he lay upon. How well is it for us that this most comfortable doctrine of the gospel, that Jesus Christ, our Redeemer and Saviour, has power to forgive sin, has such a full attestation! (3.) That Jesus Christ is God. He appears to be so, [1.] By knowing the thoughts of the scribes and Pharisees (Luk 5:22), which it is God's prerogative to do, though these scribes and Pharisees knew as well how to conceal their thoughts, and keep their countenances, as most men, and probably were industrious to do it at this time, for they lay in wait secretly. [2.] By doing that which their thoughts owned none could do but God only (Luk 5:21): Who can forgive sins, say they, but only God? "I will prove," saith Christ, "that I can forgive sins;" and what follows then but that he is God? What horrid wickedness then were they guilty of who charged him with speaking the worst of blasphemies, even when he spoke the best of blessings, Thy sins are forgiven thee!

2.The duties that are taught us, and recommended to us, by this story. (1.) In our applications to Christ, we must be very pressing and urgent: that is an evidence of faith, and is very pleasing to Christ and prevailing with him. They that were the friends of this sick man sought means to bring him in before Christ (Luk 5:18); and, when they were baffled in their endeavour, they did not give up their cause; but when they could not get in by the door, it was so crowded, they untiled the house, and let the poor patient down through the roof, into the midst before Jesus, Luk 5:19. In this Jesus Christ saw their faith, Luk 5:20. Now here he has taught us (and it were well if we could learn the lesson) to put the best construction upon words and actions that they will bear. When the centurion and the woman of Canaan were in no care at all to bring the patients they interceded for into Christ's presence, but believed that he could cure them at a distance, he commended their faith. But though in these there seemed to be a different notion of the thing, and an apprehension that it was requisite the patient should be brought into his presence, yet he did not censure and condemn their weakness, did not ask them, "Why do you give this disturbance to the assembly? Are you under such a degree of infidelity as to think I could not have cured him, though he had been out of doors?" But he made the best of it, and even in this he saw their faith. It is a comfort to us that we serve a Master that is willing to make the best of us. (2.) When we are sick, we should be more in care to get our sins pardoned than to get our sickness removed. Christ, in what he said to this man, taught us, when we seek to God for health, to begin with seeking to him for pardon. (3.) The mercies which we have the comfort of God must have the praise of. The man departed to his own house, glorifying God, Luk 5:25. To him belong the escapes from death, and in them therefore he must be glorified. (4.) The miracles which Christ wrought were amazing to those that saw them, and we ought to glorify God in them, Luk 5:26. They said, "We have seen strange things today, such as we never saw before, nor our fathers before us; they are altogether new." But they glorified God, who had sent into their country such a benefactor to it; and were filled with fear, with a reverence of God, with a jealous persuasion that this was the Messiah and that he was not treated by their nation as he ought to be, which might prove in the end the ruin of their state; perhaps they were some such thoughts as these that filled them with fear, and a concern likewise for themselves.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 17–26. Public domain.
Copy as
TertullianAD 220
On Modesty
The Lord had come, of course, to save that which "had perished; " "a Physician." necessary to "the sick" "more than to the whole." This fact He was in the habit both of typifying in parables and preaching in direct statements.
TertullianAD 220
On Modesty
Who, moreover, was able to forgive sins? This is His alone prerogative: for "who remitteth sins but God alone? " and, of course, (who but He can remit) mortal sins, such as have been committed against Himself, and against His temple? For, as far as you are concerned, such as are chargeable with offence against you personally, you are commanded, in the person of Peter, to forgive even seventy times sevenfold.
Ephrem the SyrianAD 373
HOMILY ON OUR LORD 21.1
While the Pharisee doubted that our Lord was a prophet, he was unwittingly pledging himself to the truth by thinking, “If this man were a prophet, he would know that this woman is a sinner.” Therefore, if our Lord indeed knows that she is a sinner, then, Pharisee, by your own reasoning he indeed is a prophet. And so our Lord did not hesitate to point out not only that she was a sinner but also that she had sinned very much, so that the testimony of his own mouth would trap the accuser. [The Pharisee] was one of those who had said, “Who can forgive sins but God alone?” Our Lord took this testimony from them, that whoever is able to forgive sin is God. From this point on, the struggle was for our Lord to show them whether or not he was able to forgive sin. And so he quickly healed the parts [of the body] that were visible, to confirm that he had forgiven the sins which were not visible.
Ambrose of Milan (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 397
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Mighty is the Lord who pardons one man for the good deed of another, and while he approves of the one, forgives the other his sins. Why, O man, with thee does not thy fellowman prevail, when with God a servant has both the liberty to intercede in thy behalf, and the power of obtaining what he asks? If thou despairest of the pardon of heavy sins, bring the prayers of others, bring the Church to pray for thee, and at sight of this the Lord may pardon what otherwise He might deny to thee.

From the Pharisees themselves therefore the Son of God receives testimony. For it is both more powerful evidence when men confess unwillingly, and a more fatal error when they who deny are left to the consequence of their own assertions. Hence it follows, Who can forgive sins, but God only? Great is the madness of an unbelieving people, who though they have confessed that it is of God alone to forgive sins, believe not God when He forgives sins.

The Lord wishing to save sinners shows Himself to be God, by His knowledge of the secret thoughts; as it follows, But that ye may know.

Nor is there any delay, health is present; there is but one moment both of words, and healing. Hence it follows, And immediately he rose. From this fact it is evident, that the Son of man has power on earth to forgive sins; He said this both for Himself and us. For He as God made man, as the Lord of the law, forgives sins; we also have been chosen to receive from Him the same marvellous grace. For it was said to the disciples, Whose sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them. (John 20:23.) But how does He not Himself forgive sins, Who has given to others the power of doing so? But the kings and princes of the earth when they acquit homicides, release them from their present punishment, but cannot expiate their crimes.

They behold him rising up, still disbelieving, and marvel at his departing; as it follows, And they were all amazed.

But they had rather fear the miracles of divine working, than believe them. As it follows, And they were filled with fear. But if they had believed they had not surely feared, but loved; for perfect love casteth out fear. But this was no careless or trifling cure of the paralytic, since our Lord is said to have prayed first, not for the petition's sake, but for an example.

Now let every sick person have those that will pray for his salvation, by whom the loosened joints of our life and halting steps may be renewed by the remedy of the heavenly word. Let there be then certain monitors of the soul, to raise the mind of man, though grown dull through the weakness of the external body, to higher things, by the aid of which being able again easily to raise and humble itself, it may be placed before Jesus worthy to be presented in the Lord's sight. For the Lord beholdeth the humble.

But the Lord, pointing out the full hope of resurrection, pardons the sins of the soul, sets aside the weakness of the flesh. For this is the curing of the whole man. Although then it is a great thing to forgive the sins of men, it is yet much more divine to give resurrection to the bodies, since indeed God is the resurrection. But the bed which is ordered to be taken up is nothing else but the human body.

Or it may reseek its own home, i. e. return to Paradise, for that is its true home, which first received man, and was lost not fairly, but by treachery. Rightly then is the soul restored thither, since He has come Who will undo the treacherous knot, and reestablish righteousness.
John Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 407
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
But they are to be admired who brought in the paralytic, since on finding that they could not enter in at the door, they attempted a new and untried way. As it follows, And when they could not find by what way they might bring him in, they went upon the housetop, &c. But unroofing the house they let down the couch, and place the paralytic in the midst, as it follows, And they let him down through the things. Some one may say, that the place was let down, from which they lowered the couch of the palsied man through the things.

(Hom. 29. in Matt.) But there was combined in this the faith also of the sufferer himself. For he would not have submitted to be let down, had he not believed.

(ubi sup.) Now if we suffer bodily, we are enough concerned to get rid of the hurtful thing; but when there has harm happened to the soul, we delay, and so are neither cured of our bodily ailments. Let us then remove the fountain of evil, and the waters of sickness will cease to flow. But from fear of the multitude, the Pharisees durst not openly expose their designs, but only meditated them in their hearts Hence it follows, And they began to reason, saying, Who is this which speaketh blasphemies?

(ubi sup.) If then you disbelieve the first, (i. e. the forgiveness of sins,) behold, I add another, seeing that I lay open your inmost thoughts. Again, another that I make whole the body of the palsied man. Hence He adds, Whether is it easier? It is very plain that it is easier to restore the body to health. For as the soul is far nobler than the body, so is the forgiveness of sins more excellent than the healing of the body. But since you believe not the former, because it is hid; I will add that which is inferior, yet more open, in order that thereby that which is secret may be made manifest. And indeed in addressing the sick man, He said not, I forgive thee thy sins, expressing His own power, but, Thy sins are forgiven thee. But they compelled Him to declare more plainly His own power to them, when He said, But that you may know.

(ubi sup.) He shows the pardon of sins by the healing of the body. Hence it follows, He says unto the sick of the palsy, I say unto thee, Rise. But He manifests the healing of the body by the carrying of the bed, that so that which took place might be accounted no shadow. Hence it follows, Take up thy bed. As if He said, "I was willing through thy suffering to cure those who think that they are in health, while their souls are sick, but since they are unwilling, go and correct thy household."

(ubi sup.) The Jews creep on by degrees, glorifying God, yet thinking Him not God, for His flesh stood in their way. But still it was no slight thing to consider Him the chief of mortal men, and to have proceeded from God.
Cyril of AlexandriaAD 444
COMMENTARY ON LUKE, HOMILY 12
He then, as was said, announced forgiveness of sins, since he is endowed with a most godlike authority. But the declaration disturbed again the ignorant and envious gang of the Pharisees. They said one to another, "Who is this that speaks blasphemies?" But would you have said this about him, Pharisee, if you had known the divine Scriptures, and borne in mind the words of prophecy, and understood the adorable and mighty mystery of the incarnation? Instead, they now involve him in a charge of blasphemy, bringing against him the uttermost penalty and condemning him to death. The law of Moses commanded that whoever spoke blasphemies against God should be put to death.
Cyril of Alexandria (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 444
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
By this they hasten the sentence of death, for it was commanded in the law, that whoever blasphemed God should be punished with death. (Lev. 24:16.)
Bede (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 735
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
The Lord about to cure the man of his palsy, first loosens the chains of his sins, that He may show him, that on account of the bonds of his sins, he is punished with the loosening of his joints, and that unless the former are set free, he cannot be healed to the recovery of his limbs. Hence it follows, And when he saw their faith, &c.

For they say true, that no one can forgive sins but God, who yet forgives through those to whom He gives the power of forgiving. And therefore Christ is proved to be truly God, for He is able to forgive sins as God.

And the house where Jesus was is well described as covered with tiles, since beneath the beggarly covering of letters is found the spiritual power of grace.
BedeAD 735
On the Gospel of Luke
And the scribes and Pharisees began to consider, saying, "Who is this who speaks blasphemies? Who can forgive sins but God alone?" The scribes speak the truth, because no one can forgive sins except God, who also forgives through those to whom He has granted the power to forgive. And therefore Christ is proved to truly be God, because He can forgive sins as God. They truly bear witness to God, but by denying the person of Christ, they are deceived. Thus, the Jews err, who believe that Christ is both God and capable of forgiving sins, but do not believe that Jesus is the Christ. But the Arians err much more foolishly, who, though conquered by the words of the Gospel that Jesus is the Christ and is able to forgive sins, do not dare to deny it, yet nevertheless do not fear to deny that He is God. But He, desiring to save the unfaithful, and by the knowledge of hidden things and the power of His works, manifests that He is God.
Theophylact of Ohrid (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1107
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
But mark, that after a man has been cleansed he is then worthy to offer this gift, namely, the body and blood of the Lord, which is united to the Divine nature.

Observe that on earth He forgives sins. For while we are on earth we can blot out our sins. But after that we are taken away from the earth, we shall not be able to confess, for the gate is shut.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Luke 5:21 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.