Skip to content

Luke 24:41

“Jesus Appears to the Disciples”Luke 24:36–49

King James Version
And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, he said unto them, Have ye here any meat?

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
And G1161 while they G846 yet G2089 believed not G569 for G575 joy G5479, and G2532 wondered G2296, he said G2036 unto them G846, Have ye G2192 here G1759 any G5100 meat G1034?

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
While they were still in disbelief because of their joy and amazement, He asked them, “Do you have anything here to eat?”

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
And while they still disbelieved for joy, and wondered, he said unto them, Have ye here anything to eat?

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
While they still didn’t believe for joy, and wondered, he said to them, “Do you have anything here to eat?”

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
And while they yet beleeued not for ioy, and wondred, he saide vnto them, Haue ye here any meate?

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
and while they are not believing from the joy, and wondering, he said to them, `Have ye anything here to eat?'

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
15 Greek words
  1. ἔτιetiStillG2089ADVAdverb
  2. δὲdenowG1161CONJConjunction
  3. ἀπιστούντωνapistountōnwhile are disbelievingG569V-PAP-GPMVerb Present Active Participle Genitive Plural Masculine
  4. αὐτῶνautōntheyG846P-GPMPersonal pronoun Genitive Plural Masculine
  5. ἀπὸapoforG575PREPPreposition
  6. τῆςtēstheG3588T-GSFDefinite article Genitive Singular Feminine
  7. χαρᾶςcharasjoyG5479N-GSFNoun Genitive Singular Feminine
  8. καὶkaiandG2532CONJConjunction
  9. θαυμαζόντωνthaumazontōnamazementG2296V-PAP-GPMVerb Present Active Participle Genitive Plural Masculine
  10. εἶπενeipenHe saidG2036V-2AAI-3SVerb 2nd Aorist Active Indicative 3rd Singular
  11. αὐτοῖς·autoisto themG846P-DPMPersonal pronoun Dative Plural Masculine
  12. ἔχετέecheteHave youG2192V-PAI-2PVerb Present Active Indicative 2nd Plural
  13. τιtianythingG5100X-ASNIndefinite pronoun Accusative Singular Neuter
  14. βρώσιμονbrōsimonto eatG1034A-ASNAdjective Accusative Singular Neuter
  15. ἐνθάδε;enthadehere?G1759ADVAdverb
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem)
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
Jesus' Resurrection
Jesus' Resurrection View full PDF
Luke 22:39-46, Luke 24:36-52
Luke 22:39-46, Luke 24:36-52 View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 26,033 of 31,102 · 83.7%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

The disciples are so full of joy and wonder that they still cannot believe it, so Jesus asks whether they have any food.

“And while they yet believed not for joy,”

Their gladness is so great that they still cannot take it in.

“and wondered,”

They marvel at what is before them.

“he said unto them, Have ye here any meat?”

“Meat” means food of any kind, and the question prepares a further proof.

Passage studyLuke 24:36–49

The Risen Jesus Appears and Sends His Witnesses

Summary

On the evening of the day Jesus rose, the disciples in Jerusalem are talking over the news of the empty tomb and of the two who met him on the road to Emmaus, when Jesus himself stands among them and says, “Peace be unto you.” They are terrified and think they are seeing a spirit. He shows them his hands and feet, tells them to handle him, and eats a piece of broiled fish in front of them, so that they know he has risen in the same body that was crucified. Then he opens their understanding of the Scriptures and shows them that it was written that the Christ would suffer and rise the third day. He names them witnesses, through whom repentance and remission of sins will be preached in his name to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. Before they go, they are to wait in the city for the promise of the Father, power from on high.

Jesus stands among them and speaks peace

Luke’s last chapter runs from the empty tomb to the ascension (Luke 24), and this evening is its climax. Early that day the women had found the tomb empty and brought word to the apostles (Luke 24:1–12). Then two disciples who had walked with Jesus to Emmaus, and known him in the breaking of bread, hurried back to Jerusalem to tell the eleven and those gathered with them (Luke 24:13–35). “As they thus spake”, while those reports were still being told, Jesus himself stood in the midst of them. John adds that the doors were shut where the disciples met, for fear of the Jews, and that Jesus came, stood among them and showed them his hands and his side (John 20:19–20).

Luke records only that Jesus “stood” there. The verb hístēmi simply means to stand, and mésos means the middle, a place among others. Luke gives no account of how he came in. The Lord is suddenly among his friends, and the words “Jesus himself” (autós, himself) tell us that this is the Lord in person, the one they had followed. His sudden appearing shows that his risen body has been changed, and the verses that follow show just as clearly that it is a real body.

What did “Peace be unto you” mean?

“Peace be unto you” was the everyday greeting among Jews, shalom aleichem in Hebrew, and it wished a person wholeness and well-being. The Greek word for peace, eirḗnē, probably comes from a verb meaning to join, and it covers peace of every kind and, by implication, prosperity. Spoken by the risen Christ on this evening, the greeting carries everything his death and resurrection have won. On the night before he died he had told these same men, “Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid” (John 14:27). Now he gives it to them.

This is the peace of the Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9:6). Paul writes that Christ is “our peace”, who has broken down the dividing wall of hostility (Ephesians 2:14), and that through faith in him we have peace with God (Romans 5:1). It reaches inward as well, for “the peace of God, which passeth all understanding, shall keep your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus” (Philippians 4:6–7), and it is to rule in our hearts (Colossians 3:15). The first to hear it from the risen Lord were frightened men in a shut room.

Why the disciples thought they saw a spirit

“But they were terrified and affrighted”. Luke sets two words for fear side by side. Ptoéō means to scare or frighten, and émphobos, joined to gínomai (“to become”), means that they became terrified, very frightened. They “supposed that they had seen a spirit”. The word pneûma means breath or wind and, by analogy, a spirit, whether human, angelic, demonic or divine. Here it means what we would call a ghost, the spirit of someone who has died, without a body.

Why were they afraid when they had already heard the reports?

Their terror came from the shock of seeing him suddenly standing among them. Belief in spirits and apparitions of the dead was common in that day, and such sightings were met with fear. The Pharisees held that the dead would rise at the end of the age (Daniel 12:2), but one man rising bodily in the middle of history, ahead of that general resurrection, was something no one was looking for. Jesus had told them plainly that he would suffer and rise again (Luke 9:22, Luke 18:31–33), yet the horror of the crucifixion and the loss of their hopes left them unready to take it in. Faced with what they could not explain, they reached for the explanation they knew. Matthew records that even later, when the eleven worshipped him in Galilee, “some doubted” (Matthew 28:17).

Their mistake opens the way for what follows. The very thought that he is a spirit is the thought Jesus answers in the next verses, and so their fear becomes the occasion for his proofs.

“Why are ye troubled?”

Jesus answers with two questions. “Troubled” is tarássō, to stir or agitate, the word for water that has been stirred up. “Thoughts” is dialogismós, inner reasoning or debate, which in the New Testament often means doubting thoughts. These thoughts “arise” (anabaínō, to go up) in their hearts, and the heart, kardía, is the seat of a person’s thoughts and feelings. The first question goes to the agitation everyone could see, and the second to the reasoning beneath it.

The questions are gentle, and Jesus follows them at once with what they need in order to believe. Mark records an occasion when he upbraided the eleven for their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they had refused to believe those who saw him after he rose (Mark 16:14). In this first moment of terror he meets them with patience and evidence, as he later met Thomas (John 20:24–29).

“Handle me, and see”: the risen body

“Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself”. “Behold” and “see” in this verse are the same verb, eídō, the ordinary word for seeing, which by implication means to know. Jesus asks them to look and so to know who stands before them. “That it is I myself” is egṓ eimí autós, and Greek writes the pronoun egṓ only when it is emphatic: it is I, I myself. The one in the room is the Jesus who taught them, was crucified and was buried.

Then he invites them to touch him. “Handle” is psēlapháō, to handle or feel, to check something by touching it. He gives the reason in words anyone can follow: “for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.” The “see” at the end of that sentence translates a different verb, theōréō, to look on as a spectator, the verb Luke used when they “supposed that they had seen a spirit”. What they are looking at has flesh and bones.

When he had said this (épō, to speak or say), he showed them his hands and his feet. The verb epideíknymi means to show or display, and he held them out for the disciples to look at.

Why did Jesus show his hands and feet?

His hands and feet were where the nails had been driven, so they bore the marks of the cross. Luke leaves the wounds undescribed, but by showing those parts of his body Jesus proved who he was: the very Jesus who had been crucified and buried. The words are the plain ones, cheír for hand and poús for foot. John tells how Jesus showed them his hands and his side that same evening, and how a week later he invited Thomas to touch the print of the nails.

The marks show that the risen Lord is the Lord who suffered, and they bear witness to his sacrifice. Isaiah’s servant was “wounded for our transgressions”, and by his stripes we are healed (Isaiah 53:5). The Lord who bears those marks is the one who ascended and ever lives to make intercession for us (Hebrews 7:25).

Was his risen body the same as before?

His risen body is his own body, raised and changed. “Flesh and bones” tells us it is real and solid, a body that can be seen, touched and fed. The same chapter shows that it was changed as well. The two on the road did not know him at first (Luke 24:16), he could appear suddenly among his disciples, and he went up into heaven. Paul describes the resurrection body as sown in weakness and raised in power, sown a natural body and raised a spiritual body (1 Corinthians 15:42–44), and a spiritual body in his sense is still a body. “Flesh and bones” sets the risen body against a ghost, and leaves room for all the glory of the change.

This matters for every believer, because Christ’s resurrection is the firstfruits of ours (1 Corinthians 15:20–22). Paul says that Christ will change our lowly bodies to be fashioned like his glorious body (Philippians 3:20–21), and that the Spirit who raised Jesus from the dead will also give life to our mortal bodies (Romans 8:11). The same Jesus, in the same body, will come again in the way the apostles saw him go (Acts 1:11).

He ate before them

“They yet believed not for joy”

Even with his hands and feet before them, “they yet believed not for joy, and wondered.” “Believed not” is apistéō, to disbelieve, and the cause Luke gives is joy (chará, joy or gladness). This is the disbelief of people for whom the news is almost too good to take in, after all they had seen on the cross, and their minds were struggling to catch up with their gladness. They “wondered” (thaumázō, to wonder or marvel), caught between what they saw and what they could grasp.

“Have ye here any meat?”

Into that joy and wonder Jesus puts a homely question: “Have ye here any meat?” The word brṓsimos means anything eatable, so “meat” in the KJV means food of any kind. They gave him (epidídōmi, to hand over or offer) “a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb.” “A piece” is méros, a portion, part of a fish. Optós means cooked or roasted, so the fish was ready to eat. The honeycomb is melíssios kēríon, the comb of bees, honey still in its wax cells. Fish was everyday food, especially around the Sea of Galilee, and honey was eaten straight from the comb, so this was an ordinary supper in an extraordinary hour.

“And he took it, and did eat before them.” Lambánō is the ordinary verb to take or receive, phágō means to eat, and enṓpion means in the face of, in the sight of. He ate openly while they watched, so that their own eyes were witnesses.

Why did the risen Jesus eat?

Jesus ate to show them that he was alive in the body. His glorified body was free of the needs of mortal flesh, yet it could still take food, and a ghost could do none of this. Peter later preached that God showed the risen Jesus to chosen witnesses, who ate and drank with him after he rose (Acts 10:40–41), and Luke writes in Acts that Jesus showed himself alive after his passion by many proofs (Acts 1:3). That bodily resurrection stands at the heart of the gospel Paul received, that Christ died, was buried and rose again the third day according to the Scriptures (1 Corinthians 15:3–4), and if Christ has not been raised, the preaching of it is empty (1 Corinthians 15:14). Paul gives a whole chapter to the resurrection of the dead (1 Corinthians 15), and its hope rests on what these men saw.

Jesus had raised Lazarus (John 11), who was brought back to this mortal life. Jesus himself was raised in a glorified body that still belongs to our humanity. His eating shows that he remains truly man in his glory, our high priest who is touched with the feeling of our infirmities (Hebrews 4:15), who now sits at the right hand of God and intercedes for us (Romans 8:34). By his death and rising he has freed those who all their lives were held in fear of death (Hebrews 2:14–15). The meal also looks ahead to the marriage supper of the Lamb, where the redeemed will feast with their risen Lord (Revelation 19:9).

Everything written about him must be fulfilled

“These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you”. Jesus points them back to what he told them before the cross (Luke 9:22). What had happened was what he had foretold, and what he had foretold was what the Scriptures said: “all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me.”

“All things” is pâs, all or every. “Must” is deî, it is necessary, one must. “Fulfilled” is plēróō, to fill up, to make full, and so to carry out completely what was promised. “Written” is gráphō, to write. “Concerning me” is perí emoû, with perí marking the subject: these writings are about him. His suffering and his rising were the carrying out of what God had set down long before.

What are “the law of Moses, and the prophets, and the psalms”?

These name the three divisions of the Hebrew Scriptures, our Old Testament, as Jews arranged them in Jesus’ day. The law of Moses is the five books from Genesis to Deuteronomy. The prophets include the histories of Joshua, Judges, Samuel and Kings as well as Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel and the twelve shorter prophets. The third division, the Writings, includes Proverbs, Job, Chronicles and others, and the psalms, its largest and best-known book, stand here for the whole of it. By naming all three, Jesus says that the whole of the Scriptures speaks of him.

He had said the same to his opponents, that the Scriptures testify of him (John 5:39). Peter preached that God had fulfilled what he foretold by the mouth of all his prophets, that Christ should suffer (Acts 3:18), and Paul calls the gospel the message God promised beforehand through his prophets in the holy Scriptures (Romans 1:2). Christ is our Passover, sacrificed for us (1 Corinthians 5:7). He is the prophet like Moses whom God promised to raise up (Deuteronomy 18:15), as Peter declared (Acts 3:22). He is the son of David whose throne God promised to establish for ever (2 Samuel 7:12–16), and the angel told Mary that her son would reign over the house of Jacob without end (Luke 1:32–33). He is the servant who bore our sins in his own body on the tree (1 Peter 2:24). The psalms speak of his suffering and his reign, above all Psalm 22 and Psalm 110, both quoted of Christ in the New Testament. All the promises of God find their yea and their Amen in him (2 Corinthians 1:20).

He opened their understanding

“Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures”. Tóte, “then”, carries the account on to what Jesus did next. “Opened” is dianoígō, to open thoroughly, a word also used for explaining. “Understanding” is noûs, the mind, the faculty that thinks and perceives. “Understand” is syníēmi, to put together, to grasp how the parts fit into a whole. “The scriptures” is graphḗ, which in the plural means the sacred writings as a whole.

These men knew the Scriptures, but their hope had been shaped by the expectation of a Messiah who would free Israel from Rome and reign as king. A Messiah who would suffer, die and rise again had no place in that picture, and earlier that day they had taken the women’s report for “idle tales” (Luke 24:11). On the road Jesus had called the two “slow of heart to believe” (Luke 24:25) and “expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself” (Luke 24:27). Now he does the same for the whole company. He opens their minds, and they see him in the law, the prophets and the psalms.

God gives the Scriptures, and God gives the light to understand them. Paul speaks of a veil that lies over the heart when the old covenant is read (2 Corinthians 3:14), and says that the things of God are revealed and known by the Spirit of God (1 Corinthians 2:10–14). Jesus promised that the Spirit of truth would guide his disciples into all truth (John 16:13), and Paul prays that God would give believers the spirit of wisdom and revelation and enlighten the eyes of their understanding (Ephesians 1:17–19). What Jesus did in that room his Spirit goes on doing in his church, so that it can understand the mystery of Christ (Ephesians 3:4). From the first promise in Eden of the woman’s seed who would crush the serpent’s head (Genesis 3:15), the Scriptures point to the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29). God who spoke in times past by the prophets has spoken to us by his Son (Hebrews 1:1–2), the Alpha and the Omega (Revelation 1:8).

“Thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise”

“Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day”. Here Jesus sums up what the Scriptures say about him. “It is written” is gráphō again, the verb of verse 44, and “it behoved” is deî, the same word as “must” in verse 44: it was necessary. The two phrases stand side by side, and the necessity rests on what God had written. “Christ” is Christós, the anointed one, the Messiah. “To suffer” is páschō, and “to rise” is anístēmi, to stand up or rise, the usual word for rising from the dead. Suffering and rising belong together in God’s plan, and the one leads to the other.

This cut across all they had expected. A crucified Messiah was a scandal, for the law says that one who is hanged on a tree is accursed of God (Deuteronomy 21:23), and few had seen the suffering servant of Isaiah 53 as a picture of the Messiah. Jesus shows them that the cross was God’s way from the first, written in their own Scriptures.

Why did Christ have to suffer and rise?

Christ had to suffer because sin must be paid for, and without shedding of blood is no remission (Hebrews 9:22). In his death God’s justice was satisfied and his love shown, for God commends his love toward us in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us (Romans 5:8). He had to rise because the resurrection is God’s own seal on that work. He was delivered for our offences and raised for our justification (Romans 4:25). David had sung, “Thou wilt not leave my soul in hell” (Psalm 16:10), and the rising of Christ is the answer to that hope. Through it God has begotten us again to a living hope (1 Peter 1:3), we are raised to walk in newness of life (Romans 6:4), and by the cross he triumphed over principalities and powers (Colossians 2:15).

Repentance and remission of sins to all nations

“And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.” These words still belong to “thus it is written”. The preaching of the gospel to the nations is part of what the Scriptures foretold, along with his suffering and his rising.

Metánoia, repentance, is sorrow for guilt joined to a change of life, a turning from sin to God. Áphesis, remission, means release, freedom, pardon, sins sent away. Repentance is our turning, and remission is God’s forgiving, and the two are preached together because they belong together. “Preached” is kērýssō, to herald, to proclaim as a public crier, and in the New Testament chiefly to preach the gospel.

What does “in his name” mean?

To preach “in his name” (ónoma, a name, standing for the person, his authority and his character) is to preach by his commission and on the ground of his finished work. The power to bring sinners to repentance and to forgive them belongs to him alone, for salvation is found in no other name under heaven (Acts 4:12). Matthew records the same commission from the one to whom all power is given in heaven and in earth, with his promise to be with his disciples always (Matthew 28:18–20).

“Among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem”

“All” is pâs, the same word as “all things” in verse 44, and “nations” is éthnos, a nation or people, a word that can also mean the Gentiles. The forgiveness Jesus won is for every people. Isaiah had said that God’s servant would be a light to the Gentiles and his salvation to the end of the earth (Isaiah 49:6), and Jesus said that when he was lifted up he would draw all men to himself (John 12:32).

The preaching begins at Jerusalem (Hierousalḗm), the city of the temple, where Jesus was crucified and rose and where the Spirit would be poured out at Pentecost (Acts 2:1–4). The gospel starts where God’s dealings with Israel were centred and goes out from there to the uttermost part of the earth (Acts 1:8).

“Ye are witnesses of these things”

Hymeîs, “ye”, is the plain plural “you”, the people in that room, and esté, “are”, states what they now are. Mártys means a witness, one who has seen or heard and can testify, and by analogy a martyr, the English word that comes from it. “These things” are all that Jesus has just spoken of: the Scriptures fulfilled, his suffering and his resurrection the third day, and the message of repentance and remission for all nations.

Under the law a matter was established at the mouth of two or three witnesses (Deuteronomy 19:15). These men had walked with Jesus, seen his works and his death, and now had seen him, handled him and watched him eat. John writes of what the apostles heard, saw with their eyes and handled with their hands, and declared to others (1 John 1:1–3). Jesus had told them that the Spirit would testify of him, and that they too would bear witness, because they had been with him from the beginning (John 15:26–27). Their place as eyewitnesses was theirs alone, and the church has heard the gospel through them ever since.

Their witness carries on the witness of Jesus himself, the faithful and true witness (Revelation 3:14), who came into the world to bear witness to the truth (John 18:37). Many of them would suffer and die for their testimony, and the gospel they bore is the power of God unto salvation (Romans 1:16).

The promise of the Father and power from on high

“And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you”. Idoú, “behold”, calls them to attend, and the pronoun “I” is written out for emphasis: it is Jesus who sends. “The promise” is epangelía, an announcement or promise, especially God’s assurance of good. The promise of the Father is the Holy Spirit. Jesus had said he would pray the Father to give them another Comforter (John 14:16), whom the Father would send in his name (John 14:26), and Joel had foretold that God would pour out his Spirit on all flesh (Joel 2:28–29). In Acts, Jesus tells them to wait in Jerusalem for the promise of the Father, because they will soon be baptized with the Holy Ghost (Acts 1:4–5). The promise was kept on the Day of Pentecost (Acts 2). The Spirit is the Spirit of Christ (Romans 8:9), and here Jesus says that he himself sends him.

“But tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem”. “But” is dé, the connective that turns from the promise to the instruction. “Tarry” is kathízō, literally to sit down, and so to settle or stay in a place. The disciples are to stay put in the city where they had been afraid, and wait for God’s gift in God’s time before they set out.

“Until ye be endued with power from on high.” “Endued” is endýō, to put on clothes, to be clothed with something. They will be clothed with power as with a garment. “Power” is dýnamis, force or might, and especially miraculous power. “From on high” is ek, from or out of, with hýpsos, height or the sky: this power comes from heaven. The work of witnessing to all nations is too great for them, and God himself will equip them for it. Luke’s Gospel closes with the ascension (Luke 24:50–53), and Acts opens with these same men waiting in Jerusalem as they were told.

The risen Lord among his people

This evening shows us the risen Lord as he truly is, alive in the body that was nailed to the cross, standing among his people with peace. He met their fear with a greeting, their doubts with patient questions, and their slowness with his wounds and a meal of fish. The hope of every believer rests on that body, for his rising is the firstfruits, and our own bodies will be raised and changed to be like his.

The same Lord opened the Scriptures and showed that they speak of him from the law to the psalms, and by his Spirit he still gives light to those who read them. The message he gave his witnesses, repentance and forgiveness of sins in his name, was meant for all nations, and it has reached us through them. The power for that witness is God’s own gift from on high, the promise of the Father. And his first word to his frightened friends, before any proof or command, was “Peace be unto you.”

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Luke 24:36–49. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 14 verses
Passage under commentLuke 24:36–49
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Five times Christ was seen the same day that he rose: by Mary Magdalene alone in the garden (John 20:14), by the women as they were going to tell the disciples (Matthew 28:9), by Peter alone, by the two disciples going to Emmaus, and now at night by the eleven, of which we have an account in these verses, as also John 20:19. Observe,

1.The great surprise which his appearing gave them. He came in among them very seasonably, as they were comparing notes concerning the proofs of his resurrection: As they thus spoke, and were ready perhaps to put it to the question whether the proofs produced amounted to evidence sufficient of their Master's resurrection or no, and how they should proceed, Jesus himself stood in the midst of them, and put it out of question. Note, Those who make the best use they can of their evidences for their comfort may expect further assurances, and that the Spirit of Christ will witness with their spirits (as Christ here witnessed with the disciples, and confirmed their testimony) that they are the children of God, and risen with Christ. Observe, 1. The comfort Christ spoke to them: Peace be unto you. This intimates in general that it was a kind visit which Christ now paid them, a visit of love and friendship. Though they had very unkindly deserted him in his sufferings, yet he takes the first opportunity of seeing them together; for he deals not with us as we deserve. They did not credit those who had seen him; therefore he comes himself, that they might not continue in their disconsolate incredulity. He had promised that after his resurrection he would see them in Galilee; but so desirous was he to see them, and satisfy them, that he anticipated the appointment and sees them at Jerusalem. Note, Christ is often better than his word, but never worse. Now his first word to them was, Peace be to you; not in a way of compliment, but of consolation. This was a common form of salutation among the Jews, and Christ would thus express his usual familiarity with them, though he had now entered into his state of exaltation. Many, when they are advanced, forget their old friends and take state upon them; but we see Christ as free with them as ever. Thus Christ would at the first word intimate to them that he did not come to quarrel with Peter for denying him and the rest for running away from him; no, he came peaceably, to signify to them that he had forgiven them, and was reconciled to them. 2. The fright which they put themselves into upon it (Luke 24:37): They were terrified, supposing that they had seen a spirit, because he came in among them without any noise, and was in the midst of them ere they were aware. The word used (Matthew 14:26), when they said It is a spirit, is phantasma, it is a spectre, an apparition; but the word here used is pneuma, the word that properly signifies a spirit; they supposed it to be a spirit not clothed with a real body. Though we have an alliance and correspondence with the world of spirits, and are hastening to it, yet while we are here in this world of sense and matter it is a terror to us to have a spirit so far change its own nature as to become visible to us, and conversable with us, for it is something, and bodes something, very extraordinary.

II.The great satisfaction which his discourse gave them, wherein we have,

1.The reproof he gave them for their causeless fears: Why are you troubled, and why do frightful thoughts arise in your hearts? Luke 24:38. Observe here,

(1.)That when at any time we are troubled, thoughts are apt to rise in our hearts that do us hurt. Sometimes the trouble is the effect of the thoughts that arise in our hearts; our griefs and fears take rise from those things that are the creatures of our own fancy. Sometimes the thoughts arising in the heart are the effect of the trouble, without are fightings and then within are fears. Those that are melancholy and troubled in mind have thoughts arising in their hearts which reflect dishonour upon God, and create disquiet to themselves. I am cut off from thy sight. The Lord has forsaken and forgotten me.

(2.)That many of the troublesome thoughts with which our minds are disquieted arise from our mistakes concerning Christ. They here thought that they had seen a spirit, when they saw Christ, and that put them into this fright. We forget that Christ is our elder brother, and look upon him to be at as great a distance from us as the world of spirits is from this world, and therewith terrify ourselves. When Christ is by his Spirit convincing and humbling us, when he is by his providence trying and converting us, we mistake him, as if he designed our hurt, and this troubles us.

(3.)That all the troublesome thoughts which rise in our hearts at any time are known to the Lord Jesus, even at the first rise of them, and they are displeasing to him. He chid his disciples for such thoughts, to teach us to chide ourselves for them. Why art thou cast down, O my soul? Why art thou troubled? Why do thoughts arise that are neither true nor good, that have neither foundation nor fruit, but hinder our joy in God, unfit us for our duty, give advantage to Satan, and deprive us of the comforts laid up for us?

2.The proof he gave them of his resurrection, both for the silencing of their fears by convincing them that he was not a spirit, and for the strengthening of their faith in that doctrine which they were to preach to the world by giving them full satisfaction concerning his resurrection. Two proofs he gives them: -

(1.)He shows them his body, particularly his hands and his feet. They saw that he had the shape, and features, and exact resemblance, of their Master; but is it not his ghost? "No," saith Christ, "behold my hands and my feet; you see I have hands and feet, and therefore have a true body; you see I can move these hands and feet, and therefore have a living body; and you see the marks of the nails in my hands and feet, and therefore it is my own body, the same that you saw crucified, and not a borrowed one." He lays down this principle - that a spirit has not flesh and bones; it is not compounded of gross matter, shaped into various members, and consisting of divers heterogeneous parts, as our bodies are. He does not tell us what a spirit is (it is time enough to know that when we go to the world of spirits), but what it is not: It has not flesh and bones. Now hence he infers, "It is I myself, whom you have been so intimately acquainted with, and have had such familiar conversation with; it is I myself, whom you have reason to rejoice in, and not to be afraid of." Those who know Christ aright, and know him as theirs, will have no reason to be terrified at his appearances, at his approaches.

[1.]He appeals to their sight, shows them his hands and his feet, which were pierced with the nails. Christ retained the marks of them in his glorified body, that they might be proofs that it was he himself; and he was willing that they should be seen. He afterwards showed them to Thomas, for he is not ashamed of his sufferings for us; little reason then have we to be ashamed of them, or of ours for him. As he showed his wounds here to his disciples, for the enforcing of his instructions to them, so he showed them to his Father, for the enforcing of his intercessions with him. He appears in heaven as a Lamb that had been slain (Revelation 5:6); his blood speaks, Hebrews 12:24. He makes intercession in the virtue of his satisfaction; he says to the Father, as here to the disciples, Behold my hands and my feet, Zechariah 13:6, Zechariah 13:7.

[2.]He appeals to their touch: Handle me, and see. He would not let Mary Magdalene touch him at that time, John 20:17. But the disciples here are entrusted to do it, that they who were to preach his resurrection, and to suffer for doing so, might be themselves abundantly satisfied concerning it. He bade them handle him, that they might be convinced that he was not a spirit. If there were really no spirits, or apparitions of spirits (as by this and other instances it is plain that the disciples did believe there were), this had been a proper time for Christ to have undeceived them, by telling them there were no such things; but he seems to take it for granted that there have been and may be apparitions of spirits, else what need was there of so much pains to prove that he was not one? There were many heretics in the primitive times, atheists I rather think they were, who said that Christ had never any substantial body, but that it was a mere phantasm, which was neither really born nor truly suffered. Such wild notions as these, we are told, the Valentinians and Manichees had, and the followers of Simon Magus; they were called Dokētai and Phantusiastai. Blessed be God, these heresies have long since been buried; and we know and are sure that Jesus Christ was no spirit or apparition, but had a true and real body, even after his resurrection.

(2.)He eats with them, to show that he had a real and true body, and that he was willing to converse freely and familiarly with his disciples, as one friend with another. Peter lays a great stress upon this (Acts 10:41): We did eat and drink with him after he rose from the dead.

[1.]When they saw his hands and his feet, yet they knew not what to say, They believed not for joy, and wondered, Luke 24:41. It was their infirmity that they believed not, that yet they believed not, eti apistountōn autōn - they as yet being unbelievers. This very much corroborates the truth of Christ's resurrection that the disciples were so slow to believe it. Instead of stealing away his body, and saying, He is risen, when he is not, as the chief priests suggested they would do, they are ready to say again and again, He is not risen, when he is. Their being incredulous of it at first, and insisting upon the utmost proofs of it, show that when afterwards they did believe it, and venture their all upon it, it was not but upon the fullest demonstration of the thing that could be. But, though it was their infirmity, yet it was an excusable one; for it was not from any contempt of the evidence offered them that they believed not: but, First, They believed not for joy, as Jacob, when he was told that Joseph was alive; they thought it too good news to be true. When the faith and hope are therefore weak because the love and desires are strong, that weak faith shall be helped, and not rejected. Secondly, They wondered; they thought it not only too good, but too great, to be true, forgetting both the scriptures and the power of God.

[2.]For their further conviction and encouragement, he called for some meat. He sat down to meat with the two disciples at Emmaus, but it is not said that he did eat with them; now, lest that should be made an objection, he here did actually eat with them and the rest, to show that his body was really and truly returned to life, though he did not eat and drink, and converse constantly, with them, as he had done (and as Lazarus did after his resurrection, who not only returned to life, but to his former state of life, and to die again), because it was not agreeable to the economy of the state he was risen to. They gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of a honey-comb, Luke 24:42. The honey-comb, perhaps, was used as sauce to the broiled fish, for Canaan was a land flowing with honey. This was mean fare; yet, if it be the fare of the disciples, their Master will fare as they do, because in the kingdom of our Father they shall fare as he does, shall eat and drink with him in his kingdom.

3.The insight he gave them into the word of God, which they had heard and read, by which faith in the resurrection of Christ is wrought in them, and all the difficulties are cleared.

(1.)He refers them to the word which they had heard from him when he was with them, and puts them in mind of that as the angel had done (Luke 24:44): These are the words which I said unto you in private, many a time, while I was yet with you. We should better understand what Christ does, if we did but better remember what he hath said, and had but the art of comparing them together.

(2.)He refers them to the word they had read in the Old Testament, to which the word they had heard from him directed them: All things must be fulfilled which were written. Christ had given them this general hint for the regulating of their expectations - that whatever they found written concerning the Messiah, in the Old Testament, must be fulfilled in him, what was written concerning his sufferings as well as what was written concerning his kingdom; these God had joined together in the prediction, and it could not be thought that they should be put asunder in the event. All things must be fulfilled, even the hardest, even the heaviest, even the vinegar; he could not die till he had that, because he could not till then say, It is finished. The several parts of the Old Testament are here mentioned, as containing each of them things concerning Christ: The law of Moses, that is, the Pentateuch, or the five books written by Moses, - the prophets, containing not only the books that are purely prophetical, but those historical books that were written by prophetical men, - the Psalms, containing the other writings, which they called the Hagiographa. See in what various ways of writing God did of old reveal his will; but all proceeded from one and the self-same Spirit, who by them gave notice of the coming and kingdom of the Messiah; for to him bore all the prophets witness.

(3.)By an immediate present work upon their minds, of which they themselves could not but be sensible, he gave them to apprehend the true intent and meaning of the Old Testament prophecies of Christ, and to see them all fulfilled in him: Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures, Luke 24:45. In his discourse with the two disciples he took the veil from off the text, by opening the scriptures; here he took the veil from off the heart, by opening the mind. Observe here,

[1.]That Jesus Christ by his Spirit operates on the minds of men, on the minds of all that are his. He has access to our spirits, and can immediately influence them. It is observable how he did now after his resurrection give a specimen of those two great operations of his Spirit upon the spirits of men, his enlightening the intellectual faculties with a divine light, when he opened the understandings of his disciples, and his invigorating the active powers with a divine heat, when he made their hearts burn within them.

[2.]Even good men need to have their understandings opened; for though they are not darkness, as they were by nature, yet in many things they are in the dark. David prays, Open mine eyes. Give me understanding. And Paul, who knows so much of Christ, sees his need to learn more.

[3.]Christ's way of working faith in the soul, and gaining the throne there, is by opening the understanding to discern the evidence of those things that are to be believed. Thus he comes into the soul by the door, while Satan, as a thief and a robber, climbs up some other way.

[4.]The design of opening the understanding is that we may understand the scriptures; not that we may be wise above what is written, but that we may be wiser in what is written, and may be made wise to salvation by it. The Spirit in the word and the Spirit in the heart say the same thing. Christ's scholars never learn above their bibles in this world; but they need to be learning still more and more out of their bibles, and to grow more ready and mighty in the scriptures. That we may have right thoughts of Christ, and have our mistakes concerning him rectified, there needs no more than to be made to understand the scriptures.

4.The instructions he gave them as apostles, who were to be employed in setting up his kingdom in the world. They expected, while their Master was with them, that they should be preferred to posts of honour, of which they thought themselves quite disappointed when he was dead. "No," saith, he, "you are now to enter upon them; you are to be witnesses of these things (Luke 24:48), to carry the notice of them to all the world; not only to report them as matter of news, but to assert them as evidence given upon the trial of the great cause that has been so long depending between God and Satan, the issue of which must be the casting down and casting out of the prince of this world. You are fully assured of these things yourselves, you are eye and ear-witnesses of them; go, and assure the world of them; and the same Spirit that has enlightened you shall go along with you for the enlightening of others." Now here they are told,

(1.)What they must preach. They must preach the gospel, must preach the New Testament as the full accomplishment of the Old, as the continuation and conclusion of divine revelation. They must take their bibles along with them (especially when they preached to the Jews; nay, and Peter, in his first sermon to the Gentiles, directed them to consult the prophets, Acts 10:43), and must show people how it was written of old concerning the Messiah, and the glories and graces of his kingdom, and then must tell them how, upon their certain knowledge, all this was fulfilled in the Lord Jesus.

[1.]The great gospel truth concerning the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ must be published to the children of men (Luke 24:46): Thus it was written in the sealed book of the divine counsels from eternity, the volume of that book of the covenant of redemption; and thus it was written in the open book of the Old Testament, among the things revealed; and therefore thus it behoved Christ to suffer, for the divine counsels must be performed, and care taken that no word of God fall to the ground. "Go, and tell the world," First, "That Christ suffered, as it was written of him. Go, preach Christ crucified; be not ashamed of his cross, not ashamed of a suffering Jesus. Tell them what he suffered, and why he suffered, and how all the scriptures of the Old Testament were fulfilled in his sufferings. Tell them that it behoved him to suffer, that it was necessary to the taking away of the sin of the world, and the deliverance of mankind from death and ruin: nay, it became him to be perfected through sufferings," Hebrews 2:10. Secondly, "That he rose from the dead on the third day, by which not only all the offence of the cross was rolled away, but he was declared to be the Son of God with power, and in this also the scriptures were fulfilled (see 1 Corinthians 15:3, 1 Corinthians 15:4); go, tell the world how often you saw him after he rose from the dead, and how intimately you conversed with him. Your eyes see" (as Joseph said to his brethren, when his discovering himself to them was as life from the dead) "that it is my mouth that speaketh unto you, Genesis 45:12. Go, and tell them, then, that he that was dead is alive, and lives for evermore, and has the keys of death and the grave,"

[2.]The great gospel duty of repentance must be pressed upon the children of men. Repentance for sin must be preached in Christ's name, and by his authority, Luke 24:47. All men every where must be called and commanded to repent, Acts 17:30. "Go, and tell all people that the God that made them, and the Lord that bought them, expects and requires that, immediately upon this notice given, they turn from the worship of the gods that they have made to the worship of the God that made them; and not only so, but from serving the interests of the world and the flesh; they must turn to the service of God in Christ, must mortify all sinful habits, and forsake all sinful practices. Their hearts and lives must be changed, and they must be universally renewed and reformed."

[3.]The great gospel privilege of the remission of sins must be proposed to all, and assured to all that repent, and believe the gospel. "Go, tell a guilty world, that stands convicted and condemned at God's bar, that an act of indemnity has passed the royal assent, which all that repent and believe shall have the benefit of, and not only be pardoned, but preferred by. Tell them that there is hope concerning them."

(2.)To whom they must preach. Whither must they carry these proposals, and how far does their commission extend? They are here told,

[1.]That they must preach this among all nations. They must disperse themselves, like the sons of Noah after the flood, some one way and some another, and carry this light along with them wherever they go. The prophets had preached repentance and remission to the Jews, but the apostles must preach them to all the world. None are exempted from the obligations the gospel lays upon men to repent, nor are any excluded from those inestimable benefits which are included in the remission of sins, but those that by their unbelief and impenitency put a bar in their own door.

[2.]That they must begin at Jerusalem There they must preach their first gospel sermon; there the gospel church must be first formed; there the gospel day must dawn, and thence that light shall go forth which must take hold on the ends of the earth. And why must they begin there? First, Because thus it was written, and therefore it behoved them to take this method. The word of the Lord must go forth from Jerusalem, Isaiah 2:3. And see Joel 2:32; Joel 3:16; Obadiah 1:21; Zechariah 14:8. Secondly, Because there the matters of fact on which the gospel was founded were transacted; and therefore there they were first attested, where, if there had been any just cause for it, they might be best contested and disproved. So strong, so bright, is the first shining forth of the glory of the risen Redeemer that it dares face those daring enemies of his that had put him to an ignominious death, and sets them at defiance. "Begin at Jerusalem, that the chief priests may try their strength to crush the gospel, and may rage to see themselves disappointed." Thirdly, Because he would give us a further example of forgiving enemies. Jerusalem had put the greatest affronts imaginable upon him (both the rulers and the multitude), for which that city might justly have been excepted by name out of the act of indemnity; but no, so far from that, the first offer of gospel grace is made to Jerusalem, and thousands there are in a little time brought to partake of that grace.

(3.)What assistance they should have in preaching. It is a vast undertaking that they are here called to, a very large and difficult province, especially considering the opposition this service would meet with, and the sufferings it would be attended with. If therefore they ask, Who is sufficient for these things? here is an answer ready: Behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you, and you shall be endued with power from on high, Luke 24:49. He here assures them that in a little time the Spirit should be poured out upon them in greater measures than ever, and they should thereby be furnished with all those gifts and graces which were necessary to their discharge of this great trust; and therefore they must tarry at Jerusalem, and not enter upon it till this be done. Note,

[1.]Those who receive the Holy Ghost are thereby endued with a power from on high, a supernatural power, a power above any of their own; it is from on high, and therefore draws the soul upward, and makes it to aim high.

[2.]Christ's apostles could never have planted his gospel, and set up his kingdom in the world, as they did, if they had not been endued with such a power; and their admirable achievements prove that there was an excellency of power going along with them.

[3.]This power from on high was the promise of the Father, the great promise of the New Testament, as the promise of the coming of Christ was of the Old Testament. And, if it be the promise of the Father, we may be sure that the promise is inviolable and the thing promised invaluable.

[4.]Christ would not leave his disciples till the time was just at hand for the performing of this promise. It was but ten days after the ascension of Christ that there came the descent of the Spirit.

[5.]Christ's ambassadors must stay till they have their powers, and not venture upon their embassy till they have received full instructions and credentials. Though, one would think, never was such haste as now for the preaching of the gospel, yet the preachers must tarry till they be endued with power from on high, and tarry at Jerusalem, though a place of danger, because there this promise of the Father was to find them, Joel 2:28.

Historical interpretation

Nineteen Centuries of Reception

19 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

19 quotes · AD 108–1963
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
010020030040050060070080090010001100120013001400150016001700180019002000

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

Ancient Greek Expositoras quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274SourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
But some one will say, If we allow that our Lord ate after His resurrection, let us also grant that all men will after the resurrection take the nourishment of food. But these things which for a certain purpose are done by our Saviour, are not the rule and measure of nature, since in other things He has purposed differently. For He will raise our bodies, not defective but perfect and incorrupt, who yet left on His own body the prints which the nails had made, and the wound in His side, in order to show that the nature of His body remained the same after the resurrection, and that He was not changed into another substance.
I myself am convinced and believe that he was in the flesh even after the resurrection. When he came to Peter and his friends, he said to them, “Take hold of me. Touch me, and see that I am not a bodiless ghost.” They immediately touched him. They were convinced, clutching his body and his very breath. For this reason, they despised death itself and proved its victors. After the resurrection, he also ate and drank with them as a real human being, although in spirit he was united with the Father.
For is there not within a temperate simplicity a wholesome variety of eatables? Bulbs, olives, certain herbs, milk, cheese, fruits, all kinds of cooked food without sauces; and if flesh is wanted, let roast rather than boiled be set down. "Have you anything to eat here?" said the Lord to the disciples after the resurrection; and they, as taught by Him to practise frugality, "gave Him a piece of broiled fish;" and having eaten before them, says Luke, He spoke to them what He spoke.
d. AD 220TertullianAnte-NiceneSourceAgainst Marcion Book IV
But what need of so tortuous a construction, when He might have simply said, "A spirit hath not bones, even as you observe that I have not? "Why, moreover, does He offer His hands and His feet for their examination-limbs which consist of bones-if He had no bones? Why, too, does He add, "Know that it is I myself," when they had before known Him to be corporeal? Else, if He were altogether a phantom, why did He upbraid them for supposing Him to be a phantom? But whilst they still believed not, He asked them for some meat, for the express purpose of showing them that He had teeth.
d. AD 395Gregory of Nyssaas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Orat. 1. de Res.) By the command of the law indeed the Passover was eaten with bitter herbs, because the bitterness of bondage still remained, but after the resurrection the food is sweetened with a honeycomb; as it follows, And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and a honeycomb.
Therefore, we believe that Peter could not have doubted, having been convinced by so many examples of virtue. It is also clear that John believed when he saw the Savior, who believed at that moment, after he saw the empty tomb. So why does Luke mention that several were troubled? First of all, because the opinion of a few includes the sentiment of the majority; secondly, even though Peter believed in the resurrection, he could still be troubled when he saw the Lord suddenly appear with his body in a place that was locked and enclosed by walls. So Luke, in his historical account, pursued each particular event: he considered the end, while here he focused on the sequence. For, by saying: "Then he opened their minds to understand the Scriptures," he confesses that the disciples themselves came to believe what was written.
Finally, the disturbed disciples believed that they were seeing a spirit; and therefore the Lord, in order to show us the appearance of the resurrection: Touch, he said, and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones, as you see that I have. Therefore, he penetrated not through an incorporeal nature, but through the quality of a resurrected body, impermeable to use and closed. For what is touched is a body: what is felt is a body: but we will rise in a body: For there is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body; but the former is more refined, the latter more dense, since it is still concreted by the quality of earthly corruption.

For how could He not offer to touch the body in which the marks of wounds remained, the traces of scars which the Lord displayed? In this body He not only strengthens faith, but also sharpens devotion; He chose to bear the wounds inflicted for us, He did not choose to abolish them; so that He could show to God the Father the price of our freedom. The Father places such a one at His right hand, embracing the trophies of our salvation: there He will show us such martyrs with their scars as a crown.
d. AD 430Augustine of HippoPost-NiceneSourceSERMON 229J.3
While they were still flustered for joy, they were rejoicing and doubting at the same time. They were seeing and touching, and scarcely believing. What a tremendous favor grace has done us! We have neither seen nor touched, and we have believed. While they were still flustered for joy, he said, "Have you got here anything to eat? Certainly you can believe that I am alive and well if I join you in a meal." They offered him what they had: a portion of grilled fish. Grilled fish means martyrdom, faith proved by fire. Why is it only a portion? Paul says, "If I deliver my body to be burned, but have not love, I gain nothing." Imagine a complete body of martyrs. Some suffer because of love, while others suffer out of pride. Remove the pride portion, offer the love portion. That is the food for Christ. Give Christ his portion. Christ loves the martyrs who suffered out of love.
d. AD 444Cyril of AlexandriaPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON LUKE, CHAPTER 24
To produce in them a more firmly settled faith in his resurrection, he asked for something to eat. They brought a piece of broiled fish, which he took and ate in the presence of them all. He did this only to show them that the one risen from the dead was the same one who ate and drank with them during the whole previous period of time when he talked with them as a man, according to the prophet's voice. He intended them to perceive that the human body certainly does need sustenance of this kind but a spirit does not.… The power of Christ surpasses human inquiry. It is not on the level of the understanding of ordinary events. He ate a piece of fish because of the resurrection. The natural consequences of eating by no means followed in the case of Christ, as the unbeliever might object, knowing that whatsoever enters the mouth must necessarily come out into the drain. The believer will not admit these quibbles into his mind but leaves the matter to the power of God.
d. AD 444Cyril of Alexandriaas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
The Lord had shown His disciples His hands and His feet, that He might certify to them that the same body which had suffered rose again. But to confirm them still more, He asked for something to eat.
d. AD 461Leo the GreatPost-NiceneSourceTOME 5
The resurrection of the Lord was truly the resurrection of a real body, because no other person was raised than he who had been crucified and died. What else was accomplished during that interval of forty days than to make our faith entire and clear of all darkness? For a while, he spoke with his disciples and remained with them, ate with them and allowed himself to be felt with careful and inquisitive touch by those who were under the influence of doubt. This was his purpose in going in to them when the doors were shut. He gave them the Holy Ghost by his breath. After giving them the light of intelligence, he opened the secrets of holy Scripture. In his same person, he showed them the wound in the side, the prints of the nails and all the fresh tokens of the passion. He said, “See my hands and feet. It is I myself. Handle me and see. A spirit does not have flesh and bones, as you see that I have.” He did all this so that we might acknowledge that the properties of the divine and the human nature remain in him without causing a division. We now may know that the Word is not what the flesh is. We may now confess that the one Son of God is Word and flesh.
d. AD 604Gregory the Dialogistas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Mor. 14. c. 55.) For in that glory of the resurrection our body will not be incapable of handling, and more subtle than the winds and the air, (as Eutychius said,) but while it is subtle indeed through the effect of spiritual power, it will be also capable of handling through the power of nature. It follows, And when he had thus spoken, he showed them his hands and his feet, on which indeed were clearly marked the prints of the nails. But according to John, He also showed them His side which had been pierced with the spear, that by manifesting the scar of His wounds He might heal the wound of their doubtfulness. But from this place the Gentiles are fond of raising up a calumny, as if He was not able to cure the wound inflicted on Him. To whom we must answer, that it is not probable that He who is proved to have done the greater should be unable to do the less. But for the sake of His sure purpose, He who destroyed death would not blot out the signs of death. First indeed, that He might thereby build up His disciples in the faith of His resurrection. Secondly, that supplicating the Father for us, He might always show forth what kind of death He endured for many. Thirdly, that He might point out to those redeemed by His death, by setting before them the signs of that death, how mercifully they have been succoured. Lastly, that He might declare in the judgment how justly the wicked are condemned.
d. AD 735BedeEarly MedievalSourceOn the Gospel of Luke
But while they still did not believe for joy and marvelled, he said: “Have you anything here to eat?” To show forth the truth of his resurrection, he not only allowed himself to be touched by the disciples but also deigned to eat with them. Not indeed because he needed food after the resurrection, nor signifying that in the resurrection which we await we will need food, but so that he might confirm the nature of the resurrected body in such a manner that they would not think it a mere spirit, nor believe he appeared to them in semblance alone. He ate by power, not necessity. For the thirsty earth absorbs water differently from how the burning rays of the sun draw it; the former out of need, the latter by power.
d. AD 735BedeEarly MedievalSourceHomilies on the Gospels 11.9
First, we must note and diligently remember that the Lord condescended to stand in the middle of his disciples who were speaking around him and to reveal his presence in a vision of himself. This is what he promised elsewhere to all the faithful, saying, “Where there are two or three gathered together in my name, there am I in their midst.” In order to strengthen the steadfastness of our faith, which the presence of the divine benevolence always brings, he wished sometimes to show this by the presence of a physical vision of himself. Although we are lying far below the apostles’ feet, in our case we must trust that this same thing happens to us by his mercy. He is in our midst as often as we come together and gather in his name. His name is Jesus, that is, “Savior.” When we come together to speak about receiving our eternal salvation, it is undoubtedly true that we are gathered in the name of Jesus. It is not permissible to doubt that he is present among us as we are talking about the things that he himself loves. The more truly he is present, the better we retain in a more perfect heart what we profess with our mouth.
d. AD 735Bedeas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
To convey therefore the truth of His resurrection, He condescends not only to be touched by His disciples, but to eat with them, that they might not suspect that His appearance was not actual, but only imaginary. Hence it follows, And when he had eaten before them, he took the remnant, and gave to them. He ate indeed by His power, not from necessity. The thirsty earth absorbs water in one way, the burning sun in another way, the one from want, the other from power.

He ate therefore after the resurrection, not as needing food, nor as signifying that the resurrection which we are expecting will need food; but that He might thereby build up the nature of a rising body. But mystically, the broiled fish of which Christ ate signifies the sufferings of Christ. For He having condescended to lie in the waters of the human race, was willing to be taken by the hook of our death, and was as it were burnt up by anguish at the time of His Passion. But the honeycomb was present to us at the resurrection. By the honeycomb He wished to represent to us the two natures of His person. For the honeycomb is of wax, but the honey in the wax is the Divine nature in the human.

But after that He was seen, touched, and had eaten, lest He should seem to have mocked the human senses in any one respect, He had recourse to the Scriptures. And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, when I was yet with you, that is, when I was yet in the mortal flesh, in which ye also are. He indeed was then raised again in the same flesh, but was not in the same mortality with them. And He adds, That all things must be fulfilled which were written in the Law of Moses, and in the Prophets, and in the Psalms, concerning me.
d. AD 735BedeEarly MedievalSourceHomilies on the Gospels 2.9
We must also see that when the Savior appeared to his disciples, he immediately imposed on them the joys of peace. He repeated that same thing that is a part of the celebrated glory of immortality that he gave as a special pledge of salvation and life when he was about to go to his passion and death. “Peace I leave to you. My peace I give you.” The angels seen soon after he was born also proclaimed the grace of this favor to the shepherds, praising God and saying, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace to men of good will.” Certainly the entire divinely arranged plan of our Redeemer’s coming in the flesh is the reconciliation of the world. For this purpose, he became incarnate, suffered and was raised from the dead. He did this to lead us, who had incurred God’s anger by sinning, back to God’s peace by his act of reconciliation. The prophet correctly gave him the names “Father of the world to come” and “Prince of Peace.” The apostle also wrote about him to those from among the nations who had believed. He said, “Coming, he brought the good news of peace to you who were from far off and peace to those who were near, since through him we both have access in one Spirit to the Father.”
d. AD 749John DamasceneEarly MedievalSourceORTHODOX FAITH 4.1
After his resurrection from the dead, he put aside all his passions: ruin, hunger and thirst, sleep and fatigue, and the like. Although he did taste food after his resurrection, it was not in obedience to any law of nature. He did not feel hunger, but at the appointed time, he confirmed the truth of the resurrection by showing that the flesh which had suffered and that which had risen were the same.
d. AD 1107Theophylact of Ohridas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
The things eaten seem also to contain another mystery. For in that He ate part of a broiled fish, He signifies that having burnt by the fire of His own divinity our nature swimming in the sea of this life, and dried up the moisture which it had contracted from the waves, He made it divine food; and that which was before abominable He prepared to be a sweet offering to God, which the honeycomb signifies. Or by the broiled fish He signifies the active life, drying up the moisture with the coals of labour, but by the honeycomb, the contemplative life on account of the sweetness of the oracles of God.
If anything is clear from the records of Our Lord’s appearances after His resurrection, it is that the risen body was very different from the body that died and that it lives under conditions quite unlike those of natural life. It is frequently not recognized by those who see it: and it is not related to space in the same way as our bodies. The sudden appearances and disappearances suggest the ghost of popular tradition: yet he emphatically insists that He is not merely a spirit and takes steps to demonstrate that the risen body can still perform animal operations, such as eating. What makes all this baffling to us is our assumption that to pass beyond what we call Nature – beyond the three dimensions and the five highly specialized and limited senses – is immediately to be in a world of pure negative spirituality, a world where space of any sort and sense of any sort has no function. I know no grounds for believing this. To explain even an atom Schrodinger wants seven dimensions: and give us new senses and we should find a new Nature. There may be Natures piled upon Natures, each supernatural to the one beneath it, before we come to the abyss of pure spirit; and to be in that abyss, at the right hand of the Father, may not mean being absent from any of these Natures – may mean a yet more dynamic presence on all levels. That is why I think it very rash to assume that the story of the Ascension is mere allegory. I know it sounds like the work of people who imagined an absolute up and down and a local heaven in the sky. But to say this is after all to say “Assuming that the story is fake, we could thus explain how it arose.” Without that assumption we find ourselves “moving about in worlds unrealized” with no probability – or improbability – to guide us. For if the story is true then a being still in some mode, though not our mode, corporeal, withdrew at His own will from the Nature presented by our three dimensions and five senses, not necessarily into the non-sensuous and undimensioned but possibly into, or through, a world or worlds of super-sense and super-space. And He might choose to do it gradually. Who on earth knows what the spectators might see? If they say they saw a momentary movement along the vertical plane – then an indistinct mass – then nothing – who is to pronounce this improbable?
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Luke 24:41 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8