Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And he said unto them the third time, Why, what evil hath he done? I have found no cause of death in him: I will therefore chastise him, and let him go.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And G1161 he said G2036 unto G4314 them G846 the third time G5154, Why G1063, what G5101 evil G2556 hath G4160 he G3778 done G4160? I have found G2147 no G3762 cause G158 of death G2288 in G1722 him G846: I will G3811 therefore G3767 chastise G3811 him G846, and let him go G630.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
A third time he asked them, “But what has this man done wrong? I haven’t found any reason to put him to death. So I’m going to have him flogged and set free.”
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
A third time he said to them, “What evil has this man done? I have found in Him no offense worthy of death. So after I punish Him, I will release Him.”
Ask
American Standard Version
And he said unto them the third time, Why, what evil hath this man done? I have found no cause of death in him: I will therefore chastise him and release him.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
He said to them the third time, “Why? What evil has this man done? I have found no capital crime in him. I will therefore chastise him and release him.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And he sayd vnto them the third time, But what euill hath he done? I finde no cause of death in him: I will therefore chastise him, and let him loose.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And he a third time said unto them, `Why, what evil did he? no cause of death did I find in him; having chastised him, then, I will release him .'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem)
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Levant)
All Luke Sites (Levant) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 25,958 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Luke 23:22 records Pontius Pilate's third public declaration of Jesus' innocence, a desperate attempt to release Him despite the escalating demands of the Jewish crowd for His crucifixion. This pivotal moment reveals Pilate's internal conflict between upholding justice and succumbing to political pressure, as he proposes a compromise of scourging Jesus before releasing Him, hoping to appease the volatile mob.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within the dramatic narrative of Jesus' trial before Pontius Pilate, immediately following the crowd's vehement shouts for Jesus' crucifixion (Luke 23:21). It marks the climax of Pilate's repeated attempts to exonerate Jesus, having previously declared, "I find no fault in this man" (Luke 23:4), and reiterating his finding of "no cause of death in him" after sending Jesus to Herod and receiving Him back (Luke 23:14). Pilate's offer to "chastise him, and let him go" is a desperate political maneuver, an attempt to find a middle ground between justice and mob rule, highlighting the immense pressure he faced from the chief priests and the people. The subsequent verses will show the crowd's unwavering insistence, ultimately leading to Pilate's capitulation and the release of Barabbas instead.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Pontius Pilate, as the Roman prefect of Judea, held ultimate judicial and executive authority, responsible for maintaining Roman order and collecting taxes. His primary concern was civil unrest, especially during the Passover festival, which drew large, fervent crowds to Jerusalem and was a known flashpoint for nationalist sentiment. The Jewish leaders, particularly the chief priests and scribes, sought Jesus' death, but lacked the authority to execute capital punishment under Roman rule, hence their bringing Jesus to Pilate. Scourging (Latin: flagellum) was a brutal Roman punishment, often a prelude to crucifixion, designed to inflict extreme pain and public humiliation. Pilate's proposal to scourge Jesus, despite declaring Him innocent, was a common Roman tactic to placate an angry crowd or extract confessions, demonstrating his willingness to compromise justice for political expediency and fear of a riot or report to Rome.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in Luke's Gospel and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it underscores Jesus' Undeniable Innocence, a theme consistently highlighted by Pilate's multiple declarations, emphasizing that Jesus' condemnation was entirely unjust and without legal basis. This judicial verdict is crucial for understanding Jesus as the spotless Lamb of God, a perfect sacrifice. Secondly, it exposes Pilate's Moral Weakness and Political Expediency, as he prioritizes maintaining Roman order and his own position over upholding truth and justice. His compromise to "chastise him, and let him go" (Luke 23:22) reveals a tragic failure of leadership. Finally, the scene vividly portrays the Spiritual Blindness and Hostility of the Crowd and Jewish Leaders, who, despite clear evidence of Jesus' innocence, are manipulated by their leaders and persist in demanding His death, choosing a murderer (Barabbas) over the Messiah, as recounted in Luke 23:18-19. This rejection of the light is a recurring motif throughout Jesus' ministry, culminating in this climactic moment.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • evil (Greek, kakós', G2556): This term denotes something intrinsically worthless, depraved, or objectively injurious. In this context, Pilate is asserting that Jesus has done nothing inherently bad or harmful that would warrant a capital charge. His actions or teachings, from a Roman legal perspective, did not constitute a crime deserving of death.
  • cause (Greek, aítion', G158): Referring to a reason or a crime, this word emphasizes the legal basis for a charge. Pilate explicitly states he has found no aítion (cause or fault) for death in Jesus, meaning there is no legal ground or criminal act committed by Jesus that would justify the death penalty under Roman law. This reinforces Jesus' judicial innocence.
  • chastise (Greek, paideúō', G3811): While this word can broadly mean to train, educate, or discipline a child, in this specific context of a Roman trial, it refers to corporal punishment, specifically a severe flogging or scourging. Pilate's intent was to inflict a painful, humiliating physical beating upon Jesus, hoping this lesser punishment would satisfy the crowd's bloodlust and allow him to release Jesus, thus avoiding further unrest.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And he said unto them the third time,": This opening clause highlights Pilate's persistent and repeated attempts to persuade the crowd. The "third time" emphasizes his reluctance to condemn Jesus and the increasing pressure he was under, underscoring his conviction of Jesus' innocence.
  • "Why, what evil hath he done?": This rhetorical question is a desperate appeal from Pilate, challenging the crowd to provide any legitimate reason for their demand. It underscores the absence of any real wrongdoing on Jesus' part, further emphasizing the injustice of the situation.
  • "I have found no cause of death in him:": This is Pilate's explicit legal verdict. He, as the presiding Roman authority, has thoroughly investigated the charges and found no capital offense that would warrant the death penalty according to Roman law. This declaration serves as a powerful testament to Jesus' judicial innocence.
  • "I will therefore chastise him, and let [him] go.": This final clause reveals Pilate's compromise. Despite finding no cause for death, he proposes a severe physical punishment (scourging) as a concession to the mob, hoping that this lesser act of cruelty will appease them and allow him to release Jesus, thereby avoiding a full-blown riot or political repercussions from Rome.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several significant literary devices. Repetition is evident in Pilate's multiple declarations of Jesus' innocence (this being the "third time"), which serves to underscore the profound injustice of the situation and the clear absence of any legitimate charge against Jesus. This repetition also highlights Pilate's internal struggle and his desperate attempts to avoid condemning an innocent man. Irony is powerfully present, as the Roman governor, representing the law, declares Jesus innocent, while the religious leaders and the very people who should have recognized their Messiah demand His execution. The truly innocent is condemned by those who claim righteousness. Furthermore, Pilate's proposal to "chastise him" functions as a form of Foreshadowing, hinting at the physical suffering Jesus will endure, a prelude to the ultimate act of crucifixion, even as Pilate intends it as a means of release.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Luke 23:22 is a profound theological statement on the nature of divine justice and human sin. Pilate's repeated declarations of Jesus' innocence underscore the absolute blamelessness of the Son of God, a critical theological truth that validates His perfect sacrifice. The fact that the highest earthly authority finds no fault in Him highlights that His death was not a consequence of His own sin, but a deliberate act of atonement for the sins of humanity. This scene vividly portrays the depths of human depravity and spiritual blindness, where truth is rejected, justice is perverted, and an innocent life is sacrificed for political expediency and mob rule. It foreshadows the ultimate triumph of God's sovereign plan, where even human injustice serves to fulfill divine prophecy and bring about salvation.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

This verse serves as a powerful reminder that truth and justice are not always upheld in human systems, and that societal pressure can often override moral conviction. Pilate's tragic compromise, despite knowing Jesus' innocence, challenges us to examine our own willingness to stand for what is right, even when it is unpopular or costly. In a world where truth is often relative and convictions are easily swayed by public opinion or personal convenience, the unwavering innocence of Jesus stands as a beacon. For believers, this passage reinforces the foundational truth of Jesus' sinless nature, which was absolutely essential for Him to be the perfect, unblemished sacrifice for our sins. It calls us to resist the temptation to compromise our faith or values under pressure, and to instead courageously uphold biblical truth, even when it means standing against the tide of popular opinion.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does Pilate's repeated declaration of Jesus' innocence challenge my understanding of Jesus' sacrifice?
  • In what areas of my life might I be tempted to compromise truth or justice for the sake of convenience, popularity, or fear of conflict?
  • What does this passage reveal about the nature of human depravity and the importance of spiritual discernment?

FAQ

Why did Pilate offer to chastise Jesus if he found no fault in Him?

Answer: Pilate's offer to "chastise him, and let him go" was a desperate political maneuver. As the Roman governor, his primary concern was maintaining order and avoiding civil unrest, especially during the volatile Passover festival. He had repeatedly declared Jesus innocent of any capital crime (e.g., Luke 23:4 and Luke 23:14). However, faced with an increasingly agitated crowd instigated by the Jewish leaders, who were demanding Jesus' crucifixion, Pilate sought a compromise. Scourging was a severe flogging, a common Roman punishment often inflicted before crucifixion, intended to inflict extreme pain and humiliation. Pilate hoped that this lesser, but still brutal, punishment would appease the crowd's bloodlust and allow him to release Jesus, thereby avoiding a riot and protecting his own political standing with Rome. It was a tragic act of injustice, prioritizing political expediency over righteous judgment.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Pilate's repeated declaration of Jesus' innocence in Luke 23:22, despite his subsequent compromise, profoundly underscores the Christ-centered fulfillment of God's redemptive plan. The Roman governor's judicial verdict serves as an authoritative, secular confirmation that Jesus was truly "without sin" (Hebrews 4:15), the unblemished Lamb of God required for the perfect sacrifice. His death was not a consequence of His own wrongdoing, but a voluntary act of substitutionary atonement for humanity's sin. Pilate's attempt to "chastise him, and let him go" inadvertently foreshadows the physical suffering Jesus would endure as part of His atoning work, yet it also highlights the divine irony that the truly innocent One would bear the punishment for the guilty. Jesus' blamelessness, affirmed by Pilate, is foundational to His role as the righteous Savior, whose blood cleanses us from all sin (1 John 1:7). His unjust condemnation and subsequent suffering, though orchestrated by human hands, were part of God's sovereign plan to reconcile humanity to Himself, fulfilling ancient prophecies of a suffering servant who would bear the iniquity of us all (Isaiah 53:5-6). Thus, Pilate's declaration, even in its failure to secure Jesus' release, serves to magnify the perfect righteousness of Christ, essential for our salvation and His ultimate triumph over sin and death (Romans 5:8).

Copy as

Commentary on Luke 23 verses 13–25

We have here the blessed Jesus run down by the mob, and hurried to the cross in the storm of a popular noise and tumult, raised by the malice and artifice of the chief priests, as agents for the prince of the power of the air.

I. Pilate solemnly protests that he believes he has done nothing worthy of death or of bonds. And, if he did believe so, he ought immediately to have discharged him, and not only so, but to have protected him from the fury of the priests and rabble, and to have bound his prosecutors to their good behaviour for their insolent conduct. But, being himself a bad man, he had no kindness for Christ, and, having made himself otherwise obnoxious, was afraid of displeasing either the emperor or the people; and therefore, for want of integrity, he called together the chief priests, and rulers, and people (whom he should have dispersed, as a riotous and seditious assembly, and forbid them to come near him), and will hear what they have to say, to whom he should have turned a deaf ear, for he plainly saw what spirit actuated them (Luk 23:14): "You have brought," saith he, "this man to me, and, because I have a respect for you, I have examined him before you, and have heard all you have to allege against him, and I can make nothing of it: I find no fault in him; you cannot prove the things whereof you accuse him."

II. He appeals to Herod concerning him (Luk 23:15): "I sent you to him, who is supposed to have known more of him than I have done, and he has sent him back, not convicted of any thing, nor under any mark of his displeasure; in his opinion, his crimes are not capital. He has laughed at him as a weak man, but has not stigmatized him as a dangerous man." He thought Bedlam a fitter place for him than Tyburn.

III. He proposes to release him, if they will but consent to it. He ought to have done it without asking leave of them, Fiat justitia, ruat coelum - Let justice have its course, though the heavens should be desolated. But the fear of man brings many into this snare, that, whereas justice should take place, though heaven and earth come together, they will do an unjust thing, against their consciences, rather than pull an old house about their ears. Pilate declares him innocent, and therefore has a mind to release him; yet, to please the people, 1. He will release him under the notion of a malefactor, because of necessity he must release one (Luk 23:17); so that whereas he ought to have been released by an act of justice, and thanks to nobody, he would have him released by an act of grace, and not be beholden to the people for it. 2. He will chastise him, and release him. If no fault be to be found in him, why should he be chastised? There is as much injustice in scourging as in crucifying an innocent man; nor would it be justified by pretending that this would satisfy the clamours of the people, and make him the object of their pity who was not to be the object of their envy. We must not do evil that good may come.

IV. The people choose rather to have Barabbas released, a wretched fellow, that had nothing to recommend him to their favour but the daringness of his crimes. He was imprisoned for a sedition made in the city, and for murder (of all crimes among men the least pardonable), yet this was the criminal that was preferred before Christ: Away with this man, and release unto us Barabbas, Luk 23:18, Luk 23:19. And no wonder that such a man is the favourite and darling of such a mob, he that was really seditious, rather than he that was really loyal and falsely accused of sedition.

V. When Pilate urged the second time that Christ should be released, they cried out, Crucify him, crucify him, Luk 23:20, Luk 23:21. They not only will have him die, but will have him die so great a death; nothing less will serve but he must be crucified: Crucify him, crucify him.

VI. When Pilate the third time reasoned with them, to show them the unreasonableness and injustice of it, they were the more peremptory and outrageous (Luk 23:22): "Why? What evil hath he done? Name his crime. I have found no cause of death, and you cannot say what cause of death you have found in him; and therefore, if you will but speak the word, I will chastise him and let him go." But popular fury, the more it is complimented, the more furious it grows; they were instant with loud voices, with great noises or outcries, not requesting, but requiring, that he might be crucified; as if they had as much right, at the feast, to demand the crucifying of one that was innocent as the release of one that was guilty.

VII. Pilate's yielding, at length, to their importunity. The voice of the people and of the chief priests prevailed, and were too hard for Pilate, and overruled him to go contrary to his convictions and inclinations. He had not courage to go against so strong a stream, but gave sentence that it should be as they required, Luk 23:24. Here is judgment turned away backward, and justice standing afar off, for fear of popular fury. Truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter, Isa 59:14. Judgment was looked for, but behold oppression; righteousness, but behold a cry, Isa 5:7. This is repeated in Luk 23:25, with the aggravating circumstance of the release of Barabbas: He released unto them him that for sedition and murder was cast into prison, who hereby would be hardened in his wickedness, and do the more mischief, because him they had desired, being altogether such a one as themselves; but he delivered Jesus to their will, and he could not deal more barbarously with him than to deliver him to their will, who hated him with a perfect hatred, and whose tender mercies were cruelty.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 13–25. Public domain.
Copy as
Origen of AlexandriaAD 253
HOMILIES ON LEVITICUS 10.2.2
The word of the Lord is rich, and according to the opinion of Solomon, "it must be written on the heart" not once but also twice and "three times." Let us to the best of our ability also now attempt to add something to what was said long ago. Let us show how "as a type of things to come" this one male goat was sacrificed to the Lord as an offering and the other one was sent away "living." Hear in the Gospels what Pilate said to the priests and the Jewish people: "Which of these two do you want me to send out to you: Jesus, who is called the Christ, or Barabbas?" Then all the people cried out to release Barabbas and to hand Jesus over to be killed. Look, you have a male goat who was sent "living into the wilderness." He carried with him the sins of the people who cried out and said, "Crucify, crucify!" The first is a male goat sent "living into the wilderness." The second is the male goat that was offered to God as an offering to atone for sins. Christ made a true atonement for those who believe in him.
Origen of AlexandriaAD 253
AGAINST CELSUS 8.42
Celsus goes on to say that "those who killed Jesus suffered nothing for a long a time afterwards." We must inform him and all who are prone to learn the truth. The Jewish people called for the crucifixion of Jesus with shouts of "Crucify him, crucify him!" They preferred to set free the robber who had been thrown into prison for sedition and murder. They wanted Jesus, who had been delivered through envy, to be crucified. The city where all these things happened was attacked shortly after this. After a long siege, it was totally overthrown and destroyed. God judged the inhabitants of that place unworthy of living the life of citizens together. Although it may seem incredible to say, God spared this people in delivering them to their enemies. He saw that they were incurably against any improvement and were daily sinking deeper and deeper into evil. All this happened to them because the blood of Jesus was shed at their instigation and on their land. The land was no longer able to bear those who were guilty of so fearful a crime against Jesus.
Cyril of JerusalemAD 386
Catechetical Lecture 13:3
Many have been crucified throughout the world, but the demons are not afraid of any of these. These people died because of their own sins, but Christ died for the sin of others. He “did not sin, neither was deceit found in his mouth.” It was not Peter, who could be suspected of partiality, who said this, but Isaiah, who, although not present in the flesh, in spirit foresaw the Lord’s coming in the flesh. Why do I bring only the prophet as a witness? Take the witness of Pilate himself. He passed judgment on him, by saying, “I find no guilt in this man.” When he delivered him over and washed his hands, he said, “I am innocent of the blood of this just man.” The robber is another witness to Jesus’ innocence. He is the first man to enter paradise. He rebuked his friend and said, “We are receiving what our deeds deserved, but this man has done nothing wrong, because you and I were present at his judgment.”
Ambrose of Milan (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 397
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Here Pilate, who as a judge acquits Christ, is made the minister of His crucifixion. He is sent to Herod, sent back to Pilate, as it follows, Nor yet Herod, for I sent you to him, and behold nothing worthy of death is done unto him. They both refuse to pronounce Him guilty, yet for fear's sake, Pilate gratifies the cruel desires of the Jews.

Not unreasonably do they seek the pardon of a murderer, who were themselves demanding the death of the innocent. Such are the laws of iniquity, that what innocence hates, guilt loves. And here the interpretation of the name affords a figurative resemblance, for Barabbas is in Latin, the son of a father. Those then to whom it is said, Ye are of your father the Devil, are represented as about to prefer to the true Son of God the son of their father, that is, Antichrist.
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
EXPOSITION OF THE GOSPEL OF LUKE 10.101-2
Similarly, I think that this is a prototype of all judgments that they would condemn those whom they believed to be innocent. However, it is evident that the Gentiles are more tolerant than the Jews, as Pilate's association with them demonstrates, and they are more persuaded by divine works. But what about those who crucified the Lord of majesty? It is not without reason that murderers seek absolution, as they sought the destruction of the innocent. Such unjust laws have the quality of hating innocence and loving crime. However, in the interpretation of the name, it gives the appearance of a figure; for Barabbas is translated to mean 'son of the father' in Latin: therefore, those to whom it is said, 'You are of your father the devil,' are shown to prefer the son of their father, Antichrist, over the true Son of God.
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
EXPOSITION OF THE GOSPEL OF LUKE 10.100
He is sent to Herod, sent back to Pilate. And although neither of them pronounce him guilty, they still comply with the desires of someone else's cruelty. Indeed, Pilate washed his hands, but he did not wash away his deeds; for a judge ought not to yield to envy or fear, so as to deliver the blood of an innocent person. His wife warned him: grace shone in the darkness; divinity was evident; yet she did not temper the sacrilegious sentence in this way.
John Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 407
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
For they thought they could add this, namely, that Jesus was worse than a robber, and so wicked, that neither for mercy's sake, or by the privilege of the feast, ought He to be let free.
Cyril of AlexandriaAD 444
COMMENTARY ON LUKE, HOMILY 152
They brought the holy and just One to Pilate. They spoke violent and unrestrained words against him and poured out falsely invented accusations. They persisted in the ferocity with which they accused him. Pilate then ruled that it should be as they desired, although he had publicly said, “I find no wickedness in this man.” It says, “They cried out, ‘Away with him, crucify him!’ ” The Lord had rebuked this unmerciful and unlawful cry by the voice of the prophet Isaiah. It is written, “The vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah are his pleasant planting; and he looked for justice, but behold, bloodshed; for righteousness, but behold, a cry!” In another place, he said of them, “Woe to them, for they have strayed from me! Destruction to them, for they have rebelled against me! I would redeem them, but they speak lies against me.” It is written again, “Their princes shall fall by the sword, because of the rudeness of their tongue.”
BedeAD 735
On the Gospel of Luke
But he said to them the third time: "What evil has this man done? I find no cause of death in him. I will chastise him, therefore, and release him." He earnestly sought to satisfy the people with this chastisement, to prevent them from raging to the extent of crucifying the Savior, not only having offered him by pleading but even mocking and scourging, showing it to the desires of the wicked, and the words of the evangelist John, and even the column to which he is bound bears witness. He who used to free the shackled submitted his members, full of God, to lashes. The aforementioned column, placed in the Church of Mount Zion, shows clear traces to those who behold it up to this day. But although Pilate did these things, observe what the insatiable fury of the sacrilegious desires.
Bede (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 735
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Perish then those writings, which, composed so long a time after Christ, convict not the accused of magical arts against Pilate, but the writers themselves of treachery and lying against Christ.

As if he said, I will subject Him to all the scourgings and mockings you desire, but do not thirst after the innocent blood. It follows, For of necessity he must release one unto them, &c. an obligation not imposed by a decree of the imperial law, but binding by the annual custom of the nation, whom in such things he was glad to please.

Even to this day their request still clings to the Jews. For since when they had the choice given to them, they chose a robber for Jesus, a murderer for a Saviour; rightly lost they both life and salvation, and became subject to such robberies and seditions among themselves as to forfeit both their country and kingdom.

With the worst kind of death, that is, crucifixion, they long to murder the innocent. For they who hung on the cross, with their hands and feet fixed by nails to the wood, suffered a prolonged death, that their agony might not quickly cease; but the death of the cross was chosen by our Lord, as that which having overcome the Devil, He was about to place as a trophy on the brows of the faithful.

This chastisement wherewith Pilate sought to satisfy the people, lest their rage should go even so far as to crucify Jesus, John's words bear testimony that he not only threatened but performed together with mockings and scourgings. But when they saw all their charges which they brought against the Lord baffled by Pilate's diligent questioning, they resort at last to prayers only; entreating that He might be crucified.
Theophylact of Ohrid (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1107
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Wherefore by the testimony of two men, Jesus is declared innocent, but the Jews His accusers brought forward no witness whom they could believe. See then how truth triumphs. Jesus is silent, and His enemies witness for Him; the Jews make loud cries, and not one of them corroborates their clamour.

Pilate therefore lenient and easy, yet wanting in firmness for the truth, because afraid of being accused, adds, I will therefore chastise him and release him.

For the Romans permitted the Jews to live according to their own laws and customs. And it was a natural custom of the Jews to seek pardon of the prince for those who were condemned, as they asked Jonathan of Saul. And hence it is now added, with respect to their petition, And they cried all at once, Away with this man, and release unto us Barabbas, &c. (1 Sam. 14:45.)

Thus it came to pass, the once holy nation rages to slay, the Gentile Pilate forbids slaughter; as it follows, Pilate therefore spoke again unto them, but they cried out, Crucify, &c.

Three times did Pilate acquit Christ, for it follows, And he said unto them the third time, Why, what evil hath he done? I will chastise him, and let him go.

They cry out the third time against Christ, that by this third voice, they may approve the murder to be their own, which by their entreaties they extorted; for it follows, And Pilate gave sentence that it should be as they required. And he released him that for sedition and murder was cast into prison, but delivered Jesus to their will.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Luke 23:22 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.